Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 85 views

    RCD - Two-Way Solid Slabs (Part 2) - Simply Supported - Worked Example

    Uploaded by

    Al Jameel
    RCD - Two-Way Solid Slabs (Part 2) - Simply Supported - Worked Example

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    RCD - Two-Way Solid Slabs (Part 2) - Simply Supported - Worked Example

    Uploaded by

    Al Jameel
    85 views14 pages
    RCD - Two-Way Solid Slabs (Part 2) - Simply Supported - Worked Example

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    RCD - Two-Way Solid Slabs (Part 2) - Simply Supported - Worked Example

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    85 views14 pages

    RCD - Two-Way Solid Slabs (Part 2) - Simply Supported - Worked Example

    Uploaded by

    Al Jameel
    RCD - Two-Way Solid Slabs (Part 2) - Simply Supported - Worked Example

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 14
    Lectures on Reinforced Concrete Design Two-Way Solid Slabs (Part 2) Ex. 1 - Simply Supported Dr. Sherif El-Gamal Example1 (Design Of Two-Way Slab) Design the reinforcement for a rectangular simply supported having effective dimensions of 4.5mx6.3m + UE ——— and supports a live load of 10 kN/m?. f,,=30 N/mm? and f,=460 N/mm?, beam width = 230 mm. = : SOLUTION: Ly/Lx =6.3/4.5 =1.4 Two-way = Table 3.9: Basic Span/d ratio=20 Assume modification factor m =1.3 ‘ = Span minimum effective depth= Basic Ratiox mod ification factor 4500 20x13 =173 mm (take as 180 mm) Table 3.3: For mild exposure, with C30: Nominal cover = 25mm Cover=35mm Table 3.4: For 2 hr fire resistance: Nominal cover = 35mm & 3.4.6.3 Span/effective depth ratio for a rectangular or flanged beam ‘The basic spanveffective depth ratios for beams aze given in table 39. These are based on limiting the total deflection to sparv250 and this should normally ensure ‘that the part of the deflection oceurring after construction of finishes and partitions will be limited to sparv500 or 20 mum, whichever is the lesser, for spans up to 10m. For values of by/b greater than 0.3, linear interpolation between the values given in table 39 for rectangular sections and for flanged beams with by/b of 0.3 may be used. ‘Table 3.9 Basic span/effective depth ratio for rectangular or flanged beams Support conditions Rectangular [Flanged beams sections | with esos Cantilever 7, «5S Simply supported 20 160 Continuous 26 208 ‘Table 3.3 Nominal cover to all reinforcement Including links) to meet durability requirements (see NOTE 1) ‘Conditions of exposure Nominal cover (see 8.) Dimensions in miinetres Mild 25 20 20) 200, 200 Moderate = 35 30 5 20 Severe = — 40 30 B ‘Very severe — — 50) 409) 30 Most severe = = = = 50 = = = = See NOTES | See NOTES Maximum free water/cement ratio 065 060) 055 050) 045, Miniaum cement content Ckg/i®) 25 300 35 350 400 Lowest grade of concrete 30 5 cao cas, C50 These covers may be reduced to 15 ran provided that the nominal maximum sie of aggreguie dows not exceed 15 run. 2 Where concrete is subject to freezing whilst wet, airentrainment should be used (see 5.8.3 of BS&328; Part 1: 1997) and the strength grade may be reduced by 6. NOTE 1. This table relates to normal-weight aggregate of 20 mm nominal size. Adjustments to minimura cement contents (or aggregaies other than 20 mim nominal maximum size are detailed in table 8 of BS 5828 : Part 1: 1997. NOTE 2. Use of sulfate resisting cement conforming to BS 4027. These cements have lower resistance to chloride ion migration. If they ‘wet in eiforced corte very severe of mos Severe exponre condos te covers in ble3 shoud Ye iered by 0mm. NOTE 3. Cover should be not less than the nominal vale corresponding tothe relevant environmental category plus any allowance for Joss of cover due to abrasion. 37 ‘Table 3.4 Nominal cover to alll reinforcement (including links) to meet specified periods of fire resistance (see NOTES 1 and 2) Fire resistance | Nominal cover a Beans? Floors Ribs ‘Columns? Simply Contimnoas | Simply Continuous | Simply Continmous | ™ ‘supported [mm supported | ram supported | mm mam mm mm 05 207) 20) 202) 20°) 207) 2) 207) 1 202) 202) 20 20 20 2) 20) 15 20 202) 25 20 35 20 20 2 k [40 30 35 25 5 3 25 3 Cy) 40 45 35 55 5 25 4 2... 50 55 ry 65 55 25 Por the purposes of assessing a nominal cover for beams and colurmns, the cover to main bars which would have been obiained from tables 4.2 and 4. of BS 10: Part2: 1986 has been reduced by notional aowanee for serps of 10mm to cover the range 8mm to 12mm (see also 3.3.6). ©) These covers may be reduced to 15 mm provided that the nominal maximum size of aggregate does not exceed 15 mm (see 3.3.1.3). NOTE 1. The nominal covers given relate specifically to the minimum member dimensions given in figure 32. Guidance on increased ‘covers necessary if smaller members are used is given in section 4 of BS 8110: Part 2 1986. NOTE 2. Cases that lie below the bold line require attention to the additional measures necessary to reduce the risks of spalling (see ‘section 4 of BS8110: Part2: 1985). 28 Assume 10mm diameter bars, then: Overall depth, h = d+cover+ ¢/2 = 180+35+5 = 220 mm Loads: Self weight = 0.22 x 24 5.28 kN/m? Live load 10__kN/m? Ultimate load, on = 1,4x5.28 + 1.6x10 = 23.4 kKN/m? Reinforcement: Ly/Lx=1.4 Two-way simply supported. Lx=4.5m Table 3, a= 0.099 , a,=0.051 (a) Short span Steel: m, = a, nl,? = 0.099x23.4x4.5? = 46.9 kNm/m 46.9x10° —————___. = 0.048 < 0.156 z/d=0.5+\0.25-0.034/0.9 =0.94 30x 1000x180" M__ 469x100" 0.95f,= 0.95x460%0.94%180 (634mm? 7m] “Use T12 @ 150 c/c (Asp = 754 mm2/m). 8.5.3.3 Simply-supported slabs When simply-supported stabs do not have adequate provision to resist torsion at the comers, and to prevent the comers from lifting, the maximum moments per unit width are given by the following equations: Msg, = By equation 10 May = Og? ‘equation 11 NOTE. Values for asy and asy are given in table 3.13. “Tabie 3.19 Bending moment coefficients for slabs spanning in two directions at right angles, simply-supported on four sides oe io i i ey i is 1 20 een ‘00s oor [aost [oo [oom [oior [ous (0.8 02 oor fooss _[ocss [oo fooss —[o.os7 [oma ‘The values in table 3.13 are derived from the following ‘equations: 29* EH equation 13 Table 1: Areas of groups of reinforcement bars (mm?) Bar ‘Number of bars Size |(mm)| 4 2/3 /4/5|/6/7/ 8/9 | 0 |_8 | 50 | 401 | 151 | 201 | 251 | 302 | 352 | 402 | 452 | 503 10 | 79 | 157 | 236 | 314 | 393 | 471 | 550 | 628 | 707 | 785 12 | 13 | 226 | 330 | 452 | 565 | 679 | 792 | 905 | 1018 | 1134 16 | 201 | 402 | 603 | 804 | 1005] 1206 | 1407 | 1608 | 1810 | 2011 20 | 314 | 628 | 942 | 1257| 1571 | 1885/2199 2513 | 2827 | 3142 25 | 491 | 982 | 1473 | 1963/2454 2045/3436 3927 | 4418 | 4909 32 | 804 | 1608 | 2413 |3217| 4021 | 4825/5630 6434 | 7238 | 8042 40 | 4257 | 2513 | 3770 |5027 | 6283 7540/8796 10053 | 11310 | 12566! Table 2: Reinforcement bar areas (mm?) per meter width for various bar spacings Bar . 7 __ Bar Spacing (mm) Size (mm)|_75 | 100 | 125 | 150 | 175 | 200 | 225 | 250 | 275 | 300 e_| 671 | 503 | 403 | 336 | 288 | 252 | 224 | 201 | 183 | 168, 10 | 1047 | 785 | 628 | 524 | 449 | 393 | 349 | 314 | 286 | 262 12_| 1508 }.1131 | 905 | 754 | 646 | 566 | 503 | 452 | 411 | 377 46 | 2681 "2011 | 1609 |1341| 1149| 1005) 804 | 04 | 731 | 670 20 | ate9 | 3142 | 2513 | 2095] 1795 | 1571 | 1396 | 1257 | 1142 | 4047 25 | 6545 | 4909 | 3927 | 3273| 2805 | 2454 | 2182 | 1964 | 1785 | 1636 32_| 10724 | 8043 | 6434 | 5362| 4596 | 4022] 3575 | 3217 | 2925 | 2681 40_| 16756 | 12567 | 10050 | 8375 | 7179 | 6281 | 5583 5025 | 4568 | 4188 (b) Long span steel: m, = a,, nl,? = 0.051x23.4x4.5? = 24.2 kNm/m M © fybd? — 30x1000x 180° 24.2x10° 0.95 460%0.95%180 From Table 3.10: f Then the modification factor : From Table 3.9 BS8110: =[324mm? /m jae EEN 24.2%10" _ _ 997529156 2/4 =0.5+\0.25-0.025/0.9 =0.97>0.95 Use T10 @ 225 ¢/c (Axy,oy = 349 mm?/m ) M/bd? = ee. =145 xte «460%5 934 1 250N/mm? “D3 754° 1 m=0.55+ ATF) f) 0.55+ eR 1.32 M 120(0.9 + 1.45) 12 0.94555 Basic Span/effective depth ratio #20 Limiting Span/effective depth ratio = 20xm = 20x1.32 =26.4 Actual Span/depth ratio = 4500/180 = 25< 26.4 Deflection is OK. [Table 3.15 Shear force coefficient for uniformly loaded rectangular panels supported on Tour sides [with provision for torsion at corners Prype of panel and location] Ag for vals of os 10 [ut [oes as [Four edges [continuous [y [Continuous edge 033 [os [oso jos [oss jos [oss oso oso ‘One short edge discontinuous Continuous edge 036 jos oaz joss joss oar 050 Jose joss iscontinvous edge | J— |_| | |— | |— fos ‘One long edge discontinuous . Continuous edge 035 jos Joss oar oso fost Joss om Jose Discontinnous edge ozs oar _[o29 Jost fox fos: |oss joss |— "Two adjacent edges discontinnons, ‘Continuous edge jogo joss oar joso |os2 joss josr joo oso Discontinuous edge [026 [029 |as1 [oss jas [oa {oss [oso _fazs "Two short edges discontinuous, Continuous edge Four edges aiscontinnous Discontimous edge _|033 [03s |as0 [asi [oss _|oas Joss {oso [oso Check Shear LJL= 1.4 Table 3.15 By = 043 — Vee= Byxttley (Eq. 19) V= 0.43 23.4 x 4,5 = 45.3 KN/m Vr _453%1000 — 9 952N/mm? bd 1000x180 Shear stress near the support: v, = Lesser(0.8V30,5)=4.38N/mm? - Sincev Acmin oK Long Direction = T10 @ 225 ¢/¢ (Asproy= 349 mm?) > Asin oK Spacing of bars (3.12.11.2.7) Maximum spacing permitted = lesser (3d or 750mm) =540mm Spacing of short span bars = 150mm OK Spacing of long span bars = 225mm OK. End Anchorage Since v

    You might also like