Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JHLT Abstract 2016-1
JHLT Abstract 2016-1
JHLT Abstract 2016-1
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Vol 35, No 4S, April 2016
2( 12)
Too Much Information: Interaction of Donor Sequence and Acceptance
in the UNOS Database
D.A. Baran , K. Liaquat, J. Pieretti, C. Gidea, M. Munagala, M. Camacho,
C. Patel, M. Divita, M.J. Zucker. Transplant Center, Newark Beth Israel
Med Ctr, Newark, NJ.
Conclusion: High DSN grafts (> 300) can be safely transplanted into select Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA.
patients. In this cohort, High DSN recipients had lower priority UNOS status
and decreased mean PVR. Despite increased recipient-donor distance and Purpose: The Organ Care System, an ex-vivo heart perfusion platform, rep-
cold ischemia time, patient and graft outcomes in the High DSN group were resents an alternative to the current standard of cold organ storage that sus-
no different than Standard DSN. tains the donor heart in a near-physiologic state. Whether using the Organ
Care System has any effects on two-year outcomes after heart transplant
is unknown. We reviewed our institutional experience to assess two-year
outcomes on patients randomized to the Organ Care System versus standard
cold storage.
Methods: Between 2011 and 2013, 38 heart transplant patients from a single
tertiary-care medical center enrolled within the PROCEED II trial were rand-
omized to either standardard cold storage or Organ Care System. Outcomes
assessed included two-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vascu-
lopathy (CAV), any-treated rejection (ATR), biopsy-proven cellular rejection
(CMR), biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and non-fatal
major cardiac events (NF-MACE),
Results: A total of 38 patients were randomly assigned to the Organ Care
System group (n= 19) or the standard of care cold storage group (n= 19).
Recipient demographic characteristics in each group were similar. There
was no significant difference in the 2-year patient survival rate between the
Abstracts S87
two groups (Organ Care System 72.2% vs. cold storage 81.6%, p= 0.38).
Similarly, there was no difference in freedom from CAV, ATR, CMR, AMR
and NF-MACE. The Organ Care System group had significant longer total
ischemic time (361 +/- 96 vc 207 +/- 50 min) and significantly shorter cold
ischemic time compared to cold storage group (134 +/- 45 vs 207 +/- 50
mins).
Conclusion: The Organ Care System represents a promising platform for
donor heart transportation with similar intermediate results to conventional
cold strategies while providing potential benefits of physiologic preservation,
resuscitation, and improved organ utilization.
Patient survival and freedom from adverse events at two years after heart
transplantation
2( 14)
Plasma RIP3 Is Decreased in PGD after Lung Transplantation
C. D’Errico ,1 M. Hotz,1 E. Cantu,1 M. Porteous,1 M. Oyster,1 R. Shah,2
S. Arcasoy,3 L. Snyder,4 K.M. Wille,5 M. Hartwig,4 L.B. Ware,6 P. Shah,7
M. Crespo,8 C. Hage,9 A. Weinacker,10 V. Lama,11 Y. Suzuki,1 J. Orens,7
S. Kawut,1 S. Palmer,4 D.J. Lederer,3 J.D. Christie,1 N. Mangalmurti,1
J.M. Diamond.1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;
2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; 3Columbia