Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 Final
Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 Final
1 2020 NUMBER 1
INSIDE
Legal Aid in Non-litigation
Dispute Settlement Mechanisms
in Tanzania: An Assessment of the Legal
Framework and Practice
Dr. Clement Julius Mashamba
Tanganyika
Law Society
THE TANZANIA
LEGAL AID JOURNAL
VOL1 2020 NUMBER 1
Tanganyika
Law Society
Copyright:
Tanganyika Law Society, November 2020
ISSN: 1821-5564
Editorial Board
Chairperson
Prof. Dr. Alex B. Makulilo
Chief Editor
Dr. John Ubena.
Secretary
Miss. Beatrice Cherdiel
Welcome to the Tanzania Legal Aid Journal, 2020. This is the second
issue published by the Tanganyika Law Society. This Journal steps up
the intersection between research and practice within the legal aid sub
sector. NGO’s that provide legal aid services are in serious shortage
of legal aid scholarly work. Leading practitioners in the country lack
the necessary scholarly work to help them plan and programme
legal aid intervention or to measure success/achievements over time.
Development of Legal Aid Journal and dissemination of the same will
address the aforementioned weaknesses.
The journal provides the guidance to the legal aid providers in Tanzania
and every legal aid stake holders in the country, with cutting edge
scholarly articles, it will be a regular annual publication with the widest
distribution to all legal aid providers and all the legal aid stakeholders
in the country.
It is the strong belief at TLS that having publishing the Legal Aid
Journal is one of the means of ensuring continued improvement of legal
aid services to the indigent and respect for human rights. To be the
leading Legal Aid Journal in Tanzania that will bring aboard to address
continuous issues on legal aid matters within and outside the legal
profession.
Chairperson
Research and Publication Committee
The TLS has been among the pioneers of legal aid development in
Tanzania, as old as University of Dar es Salaam Legal Aid Committee.
TLS has been represented thousands of clients through its Constitution
and Legal Affairs Committee. With such a long standing and consistent
background on legal aid provision, TLS has throughout been observed
as leader through which many legal aid providers have gathered
inspiration and established operational framework. In order to improve
Legal Aid services, the Access to Justice Programme of the Tanganyika
Law Society intends to introduce the Tanganyika Law Society Legal Aid
Journal which is funded by the Legal Services Facility. Through this
initiative, TLS steps and addresses the comprehensive scholarly gap
among legal aid providers and other legal aid subsectors.
Abstract
The Tanzania civil procedural law has recognized court-annexed non-
litigation dispute settlement mechanisms, meaning that it is now
mandatory that every civil case should first be referred to any of the
non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms (arbitration,
conciliation, mediation or negotiation). This “formalization” and
infusion aims at reducing costs and delays in dispute resolution, and
facilitating an early and fair resolution of disputes with a view to
reaching mutually acceptable resolution. At the centre of such non-
litigation dispute settlement processes are the parties’ entitlement to
obtain legal aid services (i.e. legal advice and court representation.
This strives to ensure that the rights and interests of an aided person
are safeguarded and protected throughout any process in which his or
rights are being determined by a body or the person presiding over any
of the non-litigation dispute settlement resolutions. Such legal aid
services should be granted in light of the Legal Aid Act.
∗
LLB (Hons, UDSM), LL.M. (Economic & Social Rights, OUT), Ph.D. (Juvenile
Justice, OUT); member of the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and
Welfare of the Child (ACERWC: 2010-2021); and former Solicitor General of
the United Republic of Tanzania ( HYPERLINK
"mailto:mashamba.jc@gmail.com" mashamba.jc@gmail.com). However, the
views expressed in this article are solely the author’s; and they do not
represent the views of any of these institutions
1
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 1
Despite these positive developments in the country’s civil justice
system, there are some challenges that may hamper access to legal
services by the indigent in the non-litigation dispute settlement
processes: e.g. lack of a trained and accredited conciliators and
mediators, lack of training on the part of legal aid providers on the
provision of legal aid in non-litigation dispute settlement mechanisms,
and lack of awareness on the existence of such mechanisms amongst
many legal aid providers. However, the article urges the concerned
institutions to establish the pre-requisite institutional infrastructure
and regulatory framework for conciliation, mediation and negotiation
in order to kick start the functioning of the non-litigation dispute
settlement mechanisms in the country’s civil justice system. The
article also urges those concerned with the provision of legal aid to
train legal aid providers in the areas of non-litigation dispute
resolution in order to help in building a cadre of competent lawyers
and paralegals who can provide legal assistance in the non-litigation
dispute resolution mechanisms.
2
2 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
1.0 Introduction
Dispute settlement or resolution is at the centre of any
justice system. It is a process of settling a conflict, dispute
or claim involving two or more parties who have different
positions and demand varying needs to be fulfilled by
their opponent(s).1 In order to settle disputes, society has
adopted various ways of dealing with disputes in
organized, orderly, certain, transparent and consistent
manners. The most common dispute resolution
mechanisms are arbitration, conciliation, litigation,
mediation, and negotiation. While litigation is
administered formally through conventional courts, the
other mechanisms are undertaken out of the judicial
system. Hence, arbitration, conciliation, mediation and
negotiation are called alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
processes because they are alternatives to traditional
judicial resolution of disputes, which is said to be
complicated in terms of procedures, takes long to be
finalized and involves huge amounts of costs in terms of
running cases in courts. As considered in this article, the
Civil Procedure Code (‘the CPC’)2 has recognized court-
annexed non-litigation dispute settlement mechanisms,
which means that it is now mandatory that every civil case
should first, be referred to any of the non-litigation
dispute resolution mechanisms (arbitration, conciliation,
mediation or negotiation).3
1Faris, J.A., “An Analysis of the Theory and Principles of Alternative Dispute
Resolution,” LL.D. Thesis, University of South Africa, 1995, p. 45.
2 Cap. 33 R.E. 2002.
3 Order VIIIC Rule 24 of the CPC, which provides expressly that:
3
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 3
Whereas arbitration is said to be more or less regulated by
rules of procedure and formality akin to civil litigation;
conciliation, mediation and negotiation are non-litigation
dispute settlement mechanisms that are conducted in
simplified ways, depending on the party’s agreement on
any procedural issue.4 In these non-litigation dispute
resolution mechanisms, the parties take the control of the
manner through which the dispute is resolved, they
volunteer to resort to the dispute resolution process as
well as they voluntarily agree whether to settle the matter
amicably or not. The parties also choose the conciliator or
mediator to facilitate the dispute resolution process and
the venue and time at which they can convene and engage
in the amicable settlement process.
Because they strive to assert their interests and protect
their rights in the non-litigation dispute settlement
process, the parties are entitled to representation by
qualified lawyers in such process just like in the
arbitration and litigation processes. For the parties who
are cannot afford to hire counsel of their choice, they are
entitled to obtain legal aid granted under the Legal Aid
Act (2017).5 For that matter, the aim of provision of legal
aid to a party in non-litigation dispute settlement
mechanisms is to protect the interests of such a party
throughout the process.6
‘24. Subject to the provisions of any written law, the court shall refer every
civil action for negotiation, conciliation, mediation or arbitration or similar
alternative procedure, before proceeding for trial.’ [Emphasis supplied].
4 Ibid, Order VIIIC Rules 25(1) and 36(1).
5 Act No. 1 of 2017.
6 Ibid, Section 26(1) (a).
4
4 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
This article therefore, considers the provision of legal aid
to an indigent party in any non-litigation dispute
settlement process (i.e. conciliation, mediation and
negotiation) in light of the Legal Aid Act. It begins with a
conceptual analysis of the non-litigation dispute
mechanisms, and then proceeds to consider the legal
framework of non-litigation dispute settlement
mechanisms in Tanzania. The article also discusses the
scope and nature of court-annexed non-litigation dispute
settlement mechanisms, and the principles governing
court-annexed non-litigation dispute settlement processes.
Furthermore, the article examines the rationale for the
provision of legal aid to the indigent and any person in
need of such service in non-litigation dispute settlement
mechanisms. It also considers the provision of legal aid
services in procedural steps of non-litigation dispute
settlement in Tanzania. In addition, the article examines
some challenges facing legal representation and legal aid
in non-litigation dispute settlement (e.g. lack of trained
and accredited conciliators and mediators, lack of training
of legal aid providers on the provision of legal aid in non-
litigation dispute settlement mechanisms, and lack of
awareness on the existence of such mechanisms amongst
many legal aid providers).
Nonetheless, the article concludes by urging the
concerned institutions to establish the pre-requisite
institutional infrastructure and regulatory framework for
conciliation, mediation and negotiation in order to kick
start the functioning of the non-litigation dispute
settlement mechanisms in the country’s civil justice
5
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 5
system. The article also urges those concerned with the
provision of legal aid to train legal aid providers in the
areas of non-litigation dispute resolution in order help in
building a cadre of competent lawyers and paralegals who
can provide legal assistance in the non-litigation dispute
resolution mechanisms.
2.0 Conceptual Analysis of Non-Litigation Dispute
Mechanisms and Processes
Dispute settlement is a process of resolving a conflict,
dispute or claim that has reached a non-reconcilable level
pitting two or more parties that assert different positions
and demand varying needs to be fulfilled by their
opponent(s).7 It involves a tussle over competing interests
that each party wants to win against their opponent(s). To
resolve such disputes, society has for a long time devised
several formal and non-formal ways of dealing with
disputes in organized, orderly, certain, transparent and
consistent manners. This means that there are two main
ways to settle a dispute: a dispute may be resolved either
consensually or by coercion.8
Consensually, the parties find a mutually agreed solution
through alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
mechanisms, particularly through bilateral consultations
9
7 Faris, op. cit, p. 45.
8Ibid.
9Shamir, Y., Alternative Dispute Resolution Approaches and the Application (New
York: UNESCO, 2003), p. 2. See also Kimei, M.C., “Alternative Schemes for
Resolving Banking and Financial Disputes,” The Tanzania Lawyer. Vol. 1 No. 2,
2012, pp. 46-71; and Street, L., “The Language of Alternative Dispute
Resolution,” Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 66, 1992.
6
6 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
and discussions in negotiation, conciliation, mediation and
arbitration processes. The parties may resort to resolving
their dispute through coercive adjudication/litigation
process10 that includes the subsequent implementation of,
and appeal against, the court’s decision or ruling, which
includes the possibility of counter-measures in the event
of failure by the losing party to implement the decision or
ruling of the adjudication body. In the litigation process, a
dispute is referred to the court of law for its determination
in accordance with the predetermined substantive and
procedural law relating to the subject matter of the
litigation.
10The adjudication process is said to be coercive because once the parties have
referred their dispute to a court of law, they will not have control of the
process in that they do not have the right to choose the law applicable, rules of
procedure, the adjudicator, or forum for the settlement of their dispute.
However, in ADR, the parties have control of the processes in all these
respects.
7
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 7
some give and take, which means that the end result will
be a win-win situation for all parties.11
11 Faris, op. cit.
12 Ibid.
13 Mashamba, C.J., Alternative Dispute Resolution in Tanzania: Law and Practice
the CMA for arbitration. See also Kwila Peter Nkwama v. General Manager,
Marine Services Company Ltd., High Court of Tanzania (Commercial Division)
at Mwanza, Labour Revision No. 229 of 2008 (Unreported).
20 Mandatorily, labour disputes commence with mediation. Where mediation
fails, the matter should be referred to the CMA for arbitration and later to the
Labour Court for adjudication.
21 In A.G. v. Maria Mselemu High Court of Tanzania (Labour Division) at Dar
2019 (‘the 2019 Amendments to the CPC”), GN. No. 381 published on
10
10 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
court to refer “every civil action” to ADR mechanisms23 (i.e.
negotiation,24 conciliation,25 mediation26 or arbitration27),
or “similar alternative procedure”, before proceeding to
trial. One of the major legal consequences of these
amendments to the CPC is the mandatory requirement that
all civil cases (with the exception of some few types of
cases28) should first be referred to negotiation, conciliation,
mediation, arbitration or “similar alternative procedure”
before full trial is conducted.29 For that matter, these
amendments have introduced new stages concerning ADR
between the completion of pleadings and the beginning of
a full trial in all civil cases.30 These new ADR stages are
10/5/2019 (‘GN No. 381/2019’). This GN amended certain parts of the First
Schedule to the Civil Procedure Code.
23 Order VIIIC Rule 24 of the CPC.
24 Order VIIIC Rules 36-39 of the CPC.
25 Ibid.
26 Order VIIIC Rules 25-34 of the CPC.
27 Order VIIIC Rule 35 of the CPC, and he Second Schedule to the CPC. As a
by their very nature, are unsuitable for such processes. They include: (i) cases
in which a constitutional relief is sought; (ii) cases in which a definitive
interpretation of the law is necessary; (iii) cases in which injunctive reliefs or
declaratory judgments are sought; and (iv) in applications for prerogative
orders. However, these types of cases constitute only a small fraction of all
cases filed in the courts. So, the majority of the cases are amenable to ADR
and so have to go through such processes as of a mandatory requirement of
the law.
29 Order VIIIC Rule 24 of the CPC.
30 In Tanzania’s civil justice administration, a case is said to be ready for
negotiation, conciliation or mediation when all the pleadings have been duly
filed and there are no pending applications or any other preliminary matter to
be disposed of. In effect, it is when the case would ordinarily be said to be
ready for trial. See generally Chipeta, B.D., Civil Procedure in Tanzania: A
Student’s Manual (Dar es Salaam: Dar es Salaam University Press, 2002).
11
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 11
now mandatory and should be undertaken by the court in
“every civil action” before it proceeds to full trial.31
In addition, Section 101 of the Law of Marriage Act
(1971)32, as a general rule, obliges disputants in a marriage
dispute to first refer the matter to the Marriage
Conciliation Board, which should reconcile parties. Where
reconciliation fails, the Board is required to certify such
failure to the court, which shall then proceed to determine
a matrimonial petition in the adjudication process. In
terms of Section 106(2) of this law, every petition for
divorce to be filed in court must be accompanied by a
certificate issued by the Board within six months.
However, when civil disputes are referred to ADR
mechanisms, the parties are at liberty to conduct the
proceedings under the chosen method in accordance with
the principles governing, and procedure, as well as
practice, obtaining in, such ADR mechanism. As shall be
considered below, when the court refers any matter in
dispute before it to any of the ADR mechanisms in terms
of Order VIIIC rule 24 of the CPC, such matter ‘shall be
dealt with in accordance with the applicable law and the
agreement of the parties to the negotiate or conciliate and
arrive at a settlement.’33
In sum, the mandatory requirement that “every civil case”
must first be referred to negotiation, conciliation,
31 Order VIIIC Rule 24 of the CPC.
32 Cap. 29 R.E. 2002. This law is discussed at length in Mashamba, C.J.,
Introduction to Family Law in Tanzania (2nd revised edition) (Nairobi: LawAfrica
Publishers, 2017).
33 Ibid.
12
12 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
mediation, arbitration or “similar alternative procedure”
before full trial is conducted, presupposes that the parties
to such non-litigation processes are represented by
counsel. Such counsel, indeed, must be well-versed in
ADR mechanisms – procedures and processes – as well as
they should possess the requisite skills required in
administering ADR. For that matter, such legal
representation enables the parties to effectively participate
in the non-litigation dispute process and results in the
positive outcome of such process. Therefore, it is
important that, in all ADR processes (whether court-
annexed or otherwise) parties have the right to legal
representation; and, where they cannot afford to hire
counsel for that matter, legal aid should be provided to
such party in need of free legal assistance.
4.0 The Scope and Nature of Court-Annexed Non-
Litigation Dispute Settlement Mechanisms
The scope and nature of the court-annexed non-litigation
dispute settlement mechanisms in Tanzania is to
determine disputes out of court expeditiously and in a
cost-efficient manner. It should be noted from the outset
that, although many laws now make it mandatory for the
court or tribunals to first refer “every dispute” before them
to non-litigation dispute settlement processes;34 the parties
are at liberty to participate (or not to participate) in such
ADR processes. This means that the parties have the
autonomy to consent, or not to consent, to settling their
dispute through any of such mechanisms.
34 See section 86 of the Employment and Labour Relations Act (2004); and
35 https://www.dispute-resolution-hamburg.com/conciliation/what-is-
conciliation/ (accessed 7 November 2020).
36 Ibid.
37 Chattopadhyay, A., “Meaning and Scope of Conciliation,”13 September
39Order VIIIC Rule 39 of the CPC.
40 International Capital Market Association, “Conciliation and Arbitration
Proceedings.” Available at https://www.icmagroup.org/News/ (accessed 7
November 2020).
41 Honeyman, C. and N. Yawanarajah, “Beyond Intractability: A Free
15
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 15
mediation process.43 The mediator(s) should have no
direct interest in the dispute and its outcome, and no
power to render a decision. In practice, mediators have
control over the process, but not over its outcome;44
instead, power to make the decision is vested in the
parties, who have control over the outcome: they are the
architects of the solution.45 The parties agree to the
process, the content is presented through the mediation,
and the parties control the resolution of the dispute.
4.3 The Scope and Nature of Negotiation
As an essential form of ADR, negotiation is a process in
which parties to a dispute communicate, dialogue and
discuss possible outcomes directly with each other; and
exchange proposals and demands, make arguments, and
continue the discussion until a solution is reached, or an
impasse declared.46 It involves the parties themselves or
with their advisers in which the parties negotiate and try
to settle their dispute without the involvement of a third
party.47
4.4 The Scope and Nature of Arbitration
Arbitration, as one of the forms of non-litigation dispute
settlement mechanisms, has been practiced by around the
43 Mashamba, op. cit, p. 64.
44 Ibid.
45 Shamir, Y., Alternative Dispute Resolution Approaches and the Application (New
16
16 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
world for centuries.48 Under the common law, the object of
arbitration is ‘to obtain the fair resolution of disputes by
an impartial tribunal without unnecessary delay or
expense.’49 In this context, this object entails three
contexts: first, unnecessary delays and expenses in
arbitration should be avoided without compromising the
fair resolution of disputes; second, in arbitral proceedings,
the need for an impartial tribunal is paramount; and, last,
autonomy of the parties to arbitral proceedings is equally
important.50
Unlike other forms of ADR, in arbitration the scope and
requirement for resorting to an arbitration process is
premised in the mandatory prerequisite for an agreement
expressly contained in a contract requiring the parties to
refer a dispute arising in the execution of such contract to
arbitration. Again, the arbitral proceedings are strictly
private and the decision therefrom is final. Notably, the
practice of arbitration borders between informality and
formality; in that, in the arbitration process, rules of
procedure requires adherence to certain forms and
contents of Request for Arbitration51 and Pleadings,52
48 In the earlier common law, arbitration used to be known as arbitrament and
appeared in the Year Books. See, for instance, Anon (1468) Y.B., 8 Edw. IV, fo.
1, p1.
49Sutton, et al., op. cit, p. 4.
50Ibid.
17
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 17
written statements and submissions,53 discovery and
production of documents, filing of expert reports and
witness statements, holding of Evidentiary Hearing,
making of opening and closing remarks, as well as
delivery of an arbitral award that is more or less in the
shape of a court judgment.
The formalistic and complex nature of arbitration is seen
in the way arbitrators and courts are allowed to grant such
grant interim measures as injunctive orders and the
maintenance or restoration of status quo54 pending
determination of an arbitral dispute. For that matter, the
Arbitration Act provides for the court’s authority to
provide some elements of provisional measures such as
preservation of evidence or assets55 and the grant of
injunction56 or the appointment of a receiver57 pending the
determination of arbitral proceedings. Case law in
Tanzania has also allowed courts to issue interim or
conservatory orders pending the determination of arbitral
proceedings58 on the basis of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the
53 Ibid.
54 In Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Permanent Secretary,
Ministry of Water and Irrigation & A.G., High Court of Tanzania at Mtwara,
Misc. Civil Application No. 2 of 2019 (Unreported) (at pp. 12-3 of the typed
judgment), Dyansobera, J., defined the term “status quo” to mean ‘the existing
state of affairs; specifically the last, actual and uncontested state of affairs that
preceded a controversy and which is to be preserved by an order of the court.
Maintenance of status quo […] is geared at preventing irreparable damage or
change [to the subject matter] before the legal questions are determined.’
55 Section 46(2)(b) and (3) of the Arbitration Act.
56 Ibid, Section 46(2)(c).
57 Ibid.
58 See, for example, Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Permanent
Secretary, Ministry of Water and Irrigation & A.G., op. cit; Monaban Trading &
Farming Co. Ltd. v. The Cereals and Other Produce Board of Tanzania, High Court
18
18 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
CPC and Section 2(3) of Judicature and Application of
Laws Act.59 These kinds of interim measures are not
available in other non-litigation dispute settlement
mechanisms such as conciliation, mediation and
negotiation.
4.5 Principles of Court-Annexed Non-Litigation Dispute
Settlement Processes
Non-litigation dispute settlement mechanisms, processes
and procedures are guided by several underlying
principles,60 chief among them being:
(i) Parties’ voluntary resort to non-litigation dispute
settlement mechanisms;61
of Tanzania at Arusha, Misc. Civil Application No. 61 of 2019 (Unreported);
Regional Manager, TANROADS v. DB Shapriya & Co. Ltd., High Court of
Tanzania (Commercial Division) Misc. Commercial Case No. 6 of 2010
(Unreported); Tanganyika Game Fishing & Photographing Ltd. v. The Director of
Wildlife & A.G., High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam, Misc. Civil Cause
No. 42 of 1998 (Unreported); and Tanzania Sugar Producers Association v.
Minister of Finance, High Court of Tanzania (Commercial Division) Misc. Civil
Cause No. 25 of 2003 (Unreported).
59 Indeed, in Monaban Trading & Farming Co. Ltd. v. The Cereals and Other
Produce Board of Tanzania, ibid, the High Court held that Section 2(3) of
Judicature and Application of Laws Act is the proper provision to move the
court to order interim (injunctive) reliefs after the arbitral proceedings have
been commenced by a Notice of Arbitration. In granting the provisional
measures in Monaban the court also sought fortification in the doctrine of the
application of the common law and equity applicable in England on 22 July
1922 (as canvassed in Section 25(8) the English Judicature Act, 1873);
Tanganyika Game Fishing & Photographing Ltd. v. The Director of Wildlife & A.G.,
High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam, Misc. Civil Cause No. 42 of 1998
(Unreported); and Tanzania Sugar Producers Association v. Minister of Finance,
High Court of Tanzania (Commercial Division) Misc. Civil Cause No. 25 of
2003 (Unreported). See also Mareva Naviera S.A. v. International Bull Carriers
S.A. (1980) 2 All E.R. 213.
60 See generally Faris, op. cit.
19
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 19
(ii) Parties’ autonomy in participating and making
informed decisions, including the parties’ choice of
an arbitrator, mediator or conciliator of their choice;62
(iii) Efficiency in terms of time and costs;63
(iv) Confidentiality of proceedings in non-litigation
dispute settlement mechanisms;64
(v) Flexibility in terms of the procedures adopted in the
proceedings and in reaching the outcome; and
(vi) Neutrality and impartiality of third-parties who
facilitate the process.65
5.0 The Rationale for Legal Aid in Non-Litigation
Dispute Settlement Mechanisms
At the centre of any dispute settlement mechanism,
whether litigation or non-litigation, is the parties’
entitlement to representation by legal counsel or a person
61 For example, Order VIIIC Rule 36(1) of the CPC requires the consent of the
conducting any mediation session under the CPC, to ‘strive to reduce costs and
delays in dispute resolution, and facilitate an early and fair resolution of
disputes.’ (Emphasis supplied).
64 Under Order VIIIC Rule 31 of the CPC, all communications, records, and
66 See generally Danish Institute for Human Rights, Access to Justice and Legal
Aid in East Africa: A Comparison of the Legal Aid Schemes Used in the Region and
the Level of Cooperation and Coordination Between the Various Actors
(Copenhagen: The Danish Institute for Human Rights, 2011); and United
Nations Office On Drugs and Crime, Access to Legal Aid in Criminal Justice
Systems in Africa: A Survey Report (Vienna: United Nations Office On Drugs
and Crime/UN, April 2011).
67 See, for instance, Article 8 of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human
and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, 2003 (‘the Maputo
Protocol’).
68 Ibid.
21
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 21
As noted above, access to justice to indigent persons69 is
mainly actualised through the provision of free legal aid
and advice by the State or any other institution recognised
by the State.70 The relevant provisions in international
human rights treaties guaranteeing the right to legal aid
are Article 7(1)(c) of the African Charter on Human and
Peoples’ Rights (‘the Charter’ or ‘the ACHPR’); Article 8 of
the Maputo Protocol; and Article 14(3)(d) of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (‘the
ICCPR’).71
69 Section 3 of the Legal Aid Act (No.1 of 2017) defines an “indigent person” as
a person ‘whose means are insufficient to enable him to engage a private legal
practitioner and includes other categories of persons where the interests of
justice so require.’
70 Section 24(1) and (2) of the Legal Aid Act requires legal aid to be provided
(CRC); Article 17(1) of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the
Child (ACRWC); and Article 11(1) of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, adopted by the UN General Assembly
Resolution 217 A (III) dated 10 December
1948.
72 Section 27(b) of the Legal Aid Act.
22
22 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
interests of justice so demand,73 free legal assistance
should be granted to such individual.
In the context of the Legal Aid Act (2017), legal aid and
legal advice are available any person needing such
services in respect of all civil matters,75 and without any
discrimination;76 like it is the case with criminal cases.77
According to Section 27 of this law,
73Ibid, Sections 3 and 27(a).
74 See Goal 16 of Global Sustainable Development Goals, which sets out the
global aspiration of promoting the rule of law at the national and
international levels and ‘ensure equal access to justice for all.’
75 Sections 27-32 of the Legal Aid Act.
Ibid, Section 44(1) (providing that: ‘no a legal aid provider, advocate,
76
23
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 23
78 Ibid, Section 26(1) (a). Under Section 3 of this law, an “aided person” means
a person who has been gran ted legal aid under this Act.
79 Ibid, Section 26(1) (a).
24
24 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
amicable settlement process. This is intended to safeguard
the rights and interests of parties in such mechanisms.
696, at p. 100 (holding that: ‘A preliminary [matter in civil suits] raises a pure
point of law which is argued on the assumption that all the facts pleaded by
the other side are correct.’).
26
26 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
to be ably represented by counsel. At this stage, an
indigent party needs legal aid from a lawyer who will
assist that party to argue the legal issues in his or her
interests.
6.2 Provision of Legal Aid during the First Pre-Trial
Conference
Within a period of twenty-one days after conclusion of the
pleadings, a judge or a magistrate to whom a case has
been assigned is obliged to hold and preside over a first
pre-trial settlement and scheduling conference.85 This
conference is attended by the parties or their recognised
agents or advocates.86 The conference is held for the
purposes of, inter alia, resolving the case ‘through the use
of procedures for alternative dispute resolution such as
negotiation, conciliation, mediation, arbitration or such
other procedures not involving a trial.’87 At this
procedural step an indigent party is required to have legal
counsel because all the issues determined thereat are
technically legal, which needs a legal mind to assist the
indigent party.
6.3 Provision of Legal Aid at the Commencement of
Non-Litigation Dispute Resolution Process
Although conciliation and negotiations are said to be the
simplest processes of all the non-litigation dispute
settlement mechanisms in terms of procedure and
presentation of the parties’ case, they need a legal counsel
85 Order VIIIB Rule 22(1) of the CPC.
86 Ibid.
87 Ibid.
27
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 27
to guide a party to present its case in an orderly and
reasoned manner. This is so particular at the
commencement stage, where legal aid to an indigent
person, or where the interests of the matter so demand, is
of great significance.
6.3.1 The Need for Legal Aid at the Commencement of
Court-Annexed Conciliation and Negotiation Processes
As noted above, the procedural steps of conciliation and
negotiation have just been introduced into the civil justice
system of Tanzania through the 2019 Amendments to the
CPC.88 In terms of Order VIIIC Rule 36(1) of the CPC, the
court may refer “any matter in dispute” to conciliation
upon two instances: (i) at the request of any party wishing
to conciliate or negotiate; and (ii) with the consent of the
other party.89
Under Order VIIIC Rule 36(1) of the CPC, when the court
refers any matter in dispute before it to conciliation or
negotiation, such matter ‘shall be dealt with in accordance
with the applicable law and the agreement of the parties
to negotiate or conciliate and arrive at a settlement.’
However, there is currently no specific law setting out the
manner through which the conciliation and negotiation
processes will commence. In the absence of such law, the
conventional universal procedural steps relating to the
commencement of the conciliation and negotiation
processes have to be applied.
88 GN No. 381/2019.
89 Order VIIIC Rule 36(1) of the CPC.
28
28 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
Universally, conciliation and negotiation (as voluntary
processes of resolving dispute) are conducted in
accordance with the parties’ agreement to conciliate and
reach an amicable settlement. Reflected in Order VIIIC
Rule 36(1) of the CPC, this principle entails that, in the
absence of any procedural law regulating conciliation
proceedings, parties will agree on the manner through
which the conciliation proceedings will be conducted. This
agreement will include the manner through which
conciliation proceedings should commence and proceed.
90 See, for example, Section 1(1) of the Japan Shipping Exchange, Inc.’s
Conciliation Rules, available at
http://www.jseinc.org/en/tomac/conciliation/part_1.html (accessed 23
September 2020). See also Section 62(1) of the India Arbitration and
Conciliation Act (1996), which provides that: ‘The party initiating conciliation
shall send to the other party a written invitation to conciliate under this Part,
briefly identifying the subject of the dispute.’
91 See, for instance, Section 62(2) of the India Arbitration and Conciliation Act
(1996).
29
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 29
commencement of court-annexed conciliation proceedings
in Tanzania.
30
30 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
a mediator or mediators, which is the first step towards
the commencement of such proceedings is the
appointment of a mediator.
In particular, under Order VIIIC Rule 25(1) of the CPC, the
court shall require the parties to appoint and submit the
name of a “qualified”94 mediator of their choice within
fourteen days after pleadings are complete. Where the
parties fail to appoint a mediator, the court ‘shall,
manually or electronically, appoint a mediator and notify
the parties accordingly.’95 Within Seven days subsequent
to the appointment of the mediator, the court shall notify
the parties of the commencement of the mediation
session.96
Notably, with the current amendments to the CPC, it is
expected that there will be a Register of, inter alia,
Mediators. Being professionally qualified persons, the
appointment of mediators will need a great deal of
participation of lawyers to assist the parties to appoint
suitable mediators. For the indigents, this will be a very
crucial assistance in that most of the indigent persons who
have civil suits in courts in this country are not
particularly well-versed in this aspect.
94Under Order VIIIC Rule 25(6)(a)-(f) of the CPC, the following persons shall
qualify to be nominated under Order VIIIC Rule 25 (1) to act as mediators: (i)
a Judge; (ii) a registrar or deputy registrar; (iii) a magistrate in case of a
magistrates’ court; (iv) a person with the relevant qualifications and
experience in mediation appointed by the Chief Justice; (v) a retired judge or
magistrate; or (vi) a person with the relevant qualifications and experience in
mediation and chosen by the parties.’
95 Ibid, Order VIIIC Rule 25(2).
96 Ibid, Order VIIIC Rule 25(3).
31
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 31
After appointing a mediator, the parties are required to
submit to the mediator a Statement of issues together with
Pleadings and any documents of importance which
identify the issues in dispute and the parties’ positions
and interests thereon.97 Such documents, which shall also
be served on the other parties to the suit, must be
provided at least seven days before the mediation sessions
commence.98 The preparation of these documents and the
drawing of the Statement of Issues are more or less legal
aspects of civil practice, needing a lawyer to assist the
parties in the process. At this stage of the mediation
process, it is important that a person in need of legal aid is
provided with legal counsel to enable him fully comply
with this procedural requirement.
6.4 Appearance of Parties in Hearing Sessions
Legal aid to a person in need is very critical at the stage
where the non-litigation dispute resolution processes are
set for hearing. This is so principally because appearance
of parties in such proceedings is necessary in achieving
the very goal of the selected non-litigation dispute
resolution mechanism – i.e. to resolve a dispute out of
court through amicable and mutual discussions, debate,
and dialogue. It is only through being present99 at such
session that a party can manage to communicate its
97Ibid, Order VIIIC Rule 25(4).
98Ibid.
99 With the contemporary advancement in technology, it has become
32
32 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
position, present its offer, evaluate the other party’s offer,
and make an informed consent.
Whereas the CPC does not provide any procedure for
party appearance in conciliation and negotiation, it does
provide express procedure governing the appearance of
parties in mediation sessions. Under Order VIIIC Rule
27(1) of the CPC, appearance at mediation session is by
the party or his advocate or both. Prior to entering
appearance, the party and his advocate, where the parties
are represented, must be notified of the date of mediation.
Notably, where a third party may be held liable to satisfy
all or part of a judgment in the suit or to indemnify or
reimburse a party for money paid in satisfaction of all or
part of a judgment in the suit, unless the court orders
otherwise, that third party or his advocate may also attend
the mediation session.100
As it is the case with party appearance, the CPC does not
have any provisions governing non-appearance of parties
in conciliation and negotiation proceedings. Nonetheless,
the CPC has express provisions regulating a party’s failure
to appear in mediation sessions.101 In particular, where it
is not practicable to conduct a scheduled mediation
session because a party fails, without good cause, to
attend within the time appointed for the commencement
of the session, the mediator shall remit the file to the trial
judge or magistrate. Upon receipt of the case file, the trial
judge or magistrate may: (i) dismiss the suit, if the
defaulting party is a plaintiff, or strike out the defence, if
100 Order VIIIC Rule27(2) of the CPC.
101 Ibid, VIIIC Rule 29.
33
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 33
the defaulting party is a defendant;102 (ii) order a party to
pay costs;103 or (iii) make any other order he deems just.104
The implication of remitting the file to the trial judge or
magistrate for the orders set out above is that mediation
will be marked failed105 due to non-appearance of a party
or parties at the mediation session.106 Looking at the
consequences of non-appearance at mediation session, one
can only point out that an indigent party should be
adequately represented by a legal aid lawyer, who will
assist that party to avoid suffering unnecessary harm in
the conduct of its case due to non-appearance. This may
include assisting the party whose matter has been
dismissed for want of appearance to restore it.107
102 Ibid, VIIIC Rule 29(a).
103 Ibid, VIIIC Rule 29(b).
104 Ibid, VIIIC Rule 29(c).
105 Tanzania Harbours Authority v. Mathew Mtakula & 8 Others, Court of Appeal
mediation, the court may make an order for the restoration of such suit (Order
VIIIC Rule 30 of the CPC). For that matter, any party aggrieved by an order
made under Order VIIIC Rule 29 of the CPC should file in court an
application for restoration of a suit or a written statement of defence within
seven days from the date of the order (Order VIIIC Rule 30(1)). Upon the applicant
showing good cause (In terms of Order VIIIC Rule 30(2), the court is obliged
to hear and determine such application ‘within fourteen (14) days from the date of
lodging the application), the court ‘shall set aside orders made under rule 29 of
this Order and restore the suit or the defence and remit the case to the
mediator who shall issue a notice for mediation.’ (Order VIIIC Rule 30(3)).
34
34 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
6.5 The Role of Legal Aid in Hearing Sessions in Non-
Litigation Dispute Settlement Processes
The role of a legal aid providing counsel in assisting an
aided person during the entire process undertaken in any
non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism cannot be
overstated. In the conciliation and negotiation processes, a
legal aid lawyer can assist a party in the preparation and
planning for the session, definition of ground rules to
applied during the session, clarification and justification of
critical issues that may emerge at the session,108 and in
bargaining109 and problem solving as the session
progresses towards the end. In addition, a legal aid lawyer
can assist a party in drawing a conciliation or negotiation
agreement as well as its implementation.110 A legal aid
108 IEDU Note, “5 Steps of Negotiation Process,” available at
https://www.iedunote.com/negotiation-process-five-steps (accessed 23
September 2020.
109 Shamir, op. cit, p. 8 (noting that the essence of the negotiation process is
‘the actual give and take in trying to hash out an agreement, a proper
bargain.’ It is here where concessions will undoubtedly need to be made by
both parties. It is at this stage where parties exchange their bargain and
alternatives. It should be noted that, in the negotiation process, alternatives
are those actions that one can take outside the negotiations, alone or possibly
with a third partner, but without the party with whom one negotiates. The
alternative that yields the best outcome in the negotiation process is called the
Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA). Notably, the BATNA
‘is the “best alternative to a negotiated agreement.” If any of your alternatives
without negotiation is better than the deal on the negotiating table, you will
obviously go to the best alternative. If however the deal on the table is better
than any of your alternatives, it will be your BATNA. It is important to make
sure that the alternatives are indeed realistic, and try to improve your
BATNA, because the BATNA influences the way in which you conduct the
negotiations.’).
110 Mashamba, op. cit, p. 58 (observing that: ‘In the negotiation process, an
sessions. This is a meeting between the mediator and one of the parties in the
absence of the other, whereby a mediator may: calm frayed tempers, probe
36
36 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
joint sessions); and in the preparation an of a mediation
agreement, if the parties reach an amicable settlement.116
In addition, a legal aid lawyer may assist a party in the
implementation or execution of a settlement agreement
where mediation succeeds.
In addition, where the mediator seeks to makes a
declaration to the effect that further mediation is not
worthwhile, he is required to do consultation with the
parties,117 in which case a lawyer’s advice is very crucial to
a party under legal aid representation. The lawyer’s role in
this regard will be to ensure that his client’s interests are
best served and protected as required by the Legal Aid
Act.118
more into the facts of the case and hidden motives behind a party’s
negotiating strategy more closely, or discover the real needs of the party. It is
in separate sessions that mediators often make headway: timid parties talk
more freely, secrets are more easily revealed, and definite or tentative offers
made. In addition, it is in separate sessions that the mediator tries to persuade
the parties to judiciously brainstorm and share information which will assist
them to, as we say, “expand the pie” so that each party may get as much as
possible of what he would like. Furthermore, it is in separate sessions that the
mediator translates and transmits offers, clears wrong impressions and
suggests options. The mediator also uses this session to again reassure the
parties that a settlement will be reached if they tackle the process in a positive
manner. A mediator can, thus, hold as many separate sessions as he or she
wishes, so long as he or she believes he is making progress towards reaching a
resolution of the dispute. For the same reason, there is no limit to the number
of joint sessions which the mediator may hold.
116 Ibid, Order VIIIC Rule 33(a).
117 Ibid, Rule 33(b) of the CPC.
118 Section 26(1) (a) of the Legal Aid Act obliges a legal aid provider to provide
legal aid ‘with a view to protecting the interests of the aided person.’
37
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 37
reach an amicable settlement that is mutually acceptable
by both parties, in some cases an impasse may be
reached.119 This is a situation where the parties fail to
agree on a mutually acceptable amicable settlement of all
issues referred to such mechanism. In such a situation, the
entire matter will be referred back to the court for
determination of the issues in terms of Order VIIID Rule
40 of the CPC.120 At this stage, a party will need the
assistance of a lawyer to help in going back to the court to
proceed with the full trial. A lawyer is critically needed
here in order to assist a party in managing the transition
from a non-litigation setting to litigation.
mediator and parries shall strive to reach “an early resolution of the dispute”
that is “mutually acceptable”. In addition, under: Order VIIIC 36(1) of the
CPC, when a matter is referred to conciliation or negotiation, it shall be dealt
with in accordance with the applicable law and the agreement of the parties to
the negotiate or conciliate and “arrive at a settlement”.
120 In particular, Order VIIID Rule 40(1) of the CPC provides that:
121 These are: (i) persons with the relevant qualifications and experience in
mediation appointed by the Chief Justice (Order VIIIC Rule 25(6)(d) of the
CPC) and; and (ii) retired judges or magistrates (Order VIIIC Rule 25(6)(e) of
the CPC).
122 Ibid, Order VIIIC Rule 25(7).
123 Paralegals are allowed to provide legal aid pursuant to Sections 19 and
127 Under Section 24(1) and (2) of the Legal Aid Act, legal aid ‘shall be
128 Order VIIIC Rule 24 of the CPC.
129 According to Order VIIIC Rule 35 of the CPC, any matter in dispute
referred to arbitration under a court order ‘shall be dealt with as provided for
under the Second Schedule to this Code.’ In principle, the Second Schedule to
the CPC sets out rules of procedure for arbitration to conducted in respect of a
suit that has been filed in court. For the arbitration proceedings initiated
without a civil suit in court, the applicable law is the Arbitration Act and the
Rules mandate thereunder. In practice, many arbitrators conduct arbitral
proceedings in a manner that akin to the civil procedures, although with few
procedural complexities and less adherence to rules of evidence and formality
seen in the latter.
130 Order VIIIC Rule 36(21) of the CPC, when the court refers any matter in
42
42 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
mutually acceptable resolution: i.e. arriving at a
settlement.132
At the centre of such non-litigation dispute settlement
processes is the parties’ entitlement to obtain legal aid
services, which entail legal advice and court
representation.133 Deriving from both international and
our constitutional law, the right to legal aid strives to
ensure that the rights and interests of an aided person are
safeguarded and protected134 throughout any process in
which his rights are being determined by a court or any
other quasi-judicial body or person acting such capacity,
which include conciliators and mediators. Therefore, it is
now trite law that parties to non-litigation dispute
mechanisms who are unable to afford hiring advocates
should be granted legal aid in the context of the Legal Aid
Act.
Despite these positive developments in the country’s civil
justice system, there are some challenges that may hamper
access to legal services by the indigent in the non-litigation
dispute settlement processes in the near future, if left
unaddressed. Such challenges include lack of a trained
and accredited conciliators and mediators, lack of training
on the part of legal aid providers on the provision of legal
aid in non-litigation dispute settlement mechanisms, and
lack of awareness on the existence of such mechanisms
amongst many legal aid providers.
132 Ibid, Order VIIIC Rule 26(1) (b) and Rule 36(1).
133 Section 3 of the Legal Aid Act describes “legal aid services” to encompass
‘the provision of legal education and information, legal advice, assistance or
legal representation to indigent persons.’
134 Ibid, Section 26(1) (a).
43
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 43
Nevertheless, this article calls upon those concerned with
the adoption of the establishment of the institutional
infrastructure and regulatory framework for conciliation,
mediation and negotiation to act promptly in order to kick
start the functioning of the non-litigation dispute
settlement mechanisms in the country’s civil justice
system. In addition, the article urges legal aid providing
institutions, training institutions and those charged with
the function to supervise the provision of legal aid in the
country to embark on programmatic training of legal aid
providers in the areas of non-litigation dispute resolution.
This will help in building a large number of lawyers and
paralegals who can provide legal assistance in the non-
litigation dispute resolution mechanisms.
44
44 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
PROVISION OF LEGAL AID SERVICES TO JUVENILE
OFFENDERS IN TANZANIA: AN APPRAISAL OF THE
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
Mary Richard and Tike Mwambipile
∗ ∗
Abstract
The article seeks to highlight the legal framework governing provision
of legal aid service to juvenile offenders in Tanzania which are in line
with the corresponding international and regional instruments. Along
with that, it appraises the prevailing practical initiatives are taken so
far by the country. At the same time, it shades lights on possible areas
of improvement coupled with viable recommendations. In democratic
societies where the rule of law is observed, ensuring access to legal aid
services to indigent persons including special groups as children are
one of the measures to ensure no person is deprived of his or her basic
rights, even when such person conflicts with the law. Several legal
initiatives at international, regional and domestic levels have been
developed placing obligations to Tanzania to ensure that, juvenile
offenders eligible for legal aid are afforded such service not only as an
essential requirement to access justice but also as their fundamental
right. This is because legal aid specifically via legal representation
ensures protection and realization of a right to be heard especially in
criminal proceedings whose sentences arise from court’s decisions may
lead to deprivation of one’s constitutional rights.
* Head of Programs, Tanzania Women Lawyers Association (TAWLA), Advocate
of the High Court of Tanzania, LLB, LLM, E mail: mary.richard@tawla.or.tz
* Executive Director, Tanzania Women Lawyers Association (TAWLA),
Advocate of the High Court of Tanzania, LLB, MBA, Email: tike@yawla.or.tz
1
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 45
1.0 Introduction
Engagement of children in criminal activities is not only
an experience in Tanzania, but also in Africa as a continent
and elsewhere globally. Several factors contribute to this
situation including poor school conditions and
educational standards that catalyse school drop outs,
violence at home and in neighbourhood communities,
peer pressure, substance abuse (drugs or alcohol), poor
moral guidance and poverty.1 Offences such as theft and
similar crimes may however be committed by children out
of necessity. As crimes are punishable under the law
through criminal justice system, statutorily minors may
find themselves criminally liable as a result of their
engagement in the aforementioned activities. This has
therefore brought in the concept of juvenile delinquency
or juvenile offending; which is the act of participating in
unlawful behaviour as a minor or individual younger than
the statutory age of majority.2
Prevention of juvenile delinquency is an essential part of a
stable society where children are expected to engage in
lawful, socially useful activities and adopting a humanistic
orientation towards society and outlook on life. At times,
juveniles find themselves in conflict with the law;
however, being a juvenile does not exempt one from being
subjected to the due process law to avoid inter alia,
recidivism. Provision of legal aid services to children
1 Omboto John Onyango et al, “Factors Influencing Youth and Juvenile
3Cap 16, R.E 2019.
4 Section 15 of the Penal Code.
3
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 47
3.0 Legal Aid Service as an Essential Right
The right of access to justice, which is realized through the
provision of legal aid to the needy, is premised in the
fundamental principle of equal protection before the law
for all persons in any given state. It requires states to
ensure effective access to among other things, legal and
judicial services to everyone. The right of access to justice
encompasses a person’s right to be represented and or
defended by a counsel of their choice. In the
administration of criminal justice arena, access to justice is
a fundamental element of the right to a fair trial which is
an ultimate goal sought to be achieved by legal aid
providers. Access to justice by juvenile offenders
encompasses a wider scope than just a “child friendly
justice.” It encompasses procedures that are simple to
children’s comprehension and separate from adult court
processes.5 Given its significance in enhancing a well-
functioning criminal justice system, the right to fair trial is
well entrenched in all universal, regional and municipal
laws.
4.0 Recognition of a right to Legal Aid Services to
Juvenile Offenders in International, Regional and
Domestic Arena
International and regional fora on children rights
continued to set minimum standards through different
instruments for adoption and guidance of state parties in
the course of enforcing laws related to juvenile offenders.
5See Skelton Ann, “Child Justice in South Africa: Application of International
7
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 51
incidents of arrest, the right to counsel10, the right to the
presence of a parent or guardian during interrogation, the
right to confront and cross-examine witnesses and the
right to appeal.11
4.1.4 The UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles
Deprived of their Liberty, 1990 (Havana Rules)
These Rules are envisioned to prevent the detrimental
effects of deprivation of young delinquents; liberty by
ensuring respect for children’s rights.12Havana Rules
requires juvenile justice system to uphold the rights and
safety as well as promoting physical and mental well-
being of juveniles while in custody. Under these rules
Juveniles under arrest or awaiting trial have the right of
legal counsel and be enabled to apply for free legal aid
and regularly communicate to their legal advisors.13
4.1.5 UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of
Prisoners, 1955 (Mandela Rules)
The rules encourage member states to promote the
implementation of the United Nations Rules for the
Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty and the
United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women
Prisoners and Non-Custodial Measures for Women
Offenders (the Bangkok Rules). It requires prisoners to be
10
Legal aid services include legal representation by a Counsel.
11 Rule 7 of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the
Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules), 1985.
12
These Guidelines were developed by an Open-Ended Working Group of
Non-Governmental Organizations established by Defence for Children
International in cooperation with the UNODC (A/CONF.144/IPM.3, paras 3
and 65-67).
13
Rule 18 (a) of the UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their
Liberty, 1990 (Havana Rules).
8
52 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
provided with adequate opportunity, time and facilities to
be visited by and to communicate and consult with a legal
adviser of their own choice or a legal aid provider,
without delay, interception or censorship and in full
confidentiality, in conformity with applicable domestic
law. In cases in which prisoners do not speak the local
language, the prison administration ought to facilitate
access to the services of an independent competent
interpreter. The rules also insist that, prisoners should
have access to effective legal aid.14
4.1.6 UN Rules for the Treatment of Female Prisoners
and Non-Custodial Measures for Women
Offenders, 2010 (Bangkok Rules)
These rules provide for standards and norms to be
adopted by states in treatment of female prisoners and
encourage non-custodial measures for women offenders.
It should be noted that, female prisoners include female
juvenile offenders. The Rules recognize female offenders in
incarceration may fall victims of different forms of abuse
including sexual abuse by prison staff or other prisoners.
Under such circumstances they require the juvenile female
offenders to be fully informed of their right to complain
about any offences committed against them while in
custody and adequate assistance available.
4.2 Regional Level
As a member state to the African Union (AU), Tanzania
has signed the African Charter on Human and Peoples
Rights, 1981 (famously known as the Banjul Charter) on
14
Rule 67 (1), (2), (3) of the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of
Prisoners, 1955 (Mandela Rules).
9
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 53
31st May 1983 and ratified the same on 18th February 1984
respectively. She is also a party to the African Charter on
the Rights and Welfare of the Child, 1990 whereby she
signed the same on 1st of June 1990 and ratified it on 10th
June 1991. Both Charters covers the aspects related to
children in conflict with the law and their human rights
guarantees.
4.2.1 The African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights
(ACHPR)
Article 18 (3) of the Charter makes it an obligation to the
state parties to ensure the protection of the rights the child
as stipulated in international declarations and conventions
as discussed above also the principle provided for under
Article 14 (1) of the International Convention on Civil and
Political Rights, 1966 which concerns respecting the
privacy of juvenile offenders particularly in criminal cases.
4.2.2 The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of
the Child (ACRWC)
The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the
Child of 1990 agrees with the provision of CRC with
respect to access to legal aid service or assistance to
juvenile offenders. It calls for state parties to such Charter
in the administration of juvenile justice to ensure that
every child accused of infringing the penal law is afforded
legal and other appropriate assistance in the preparation
and presentation of his or her defence.15
15
Article 17 (2)(c)(iii) of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the
Child, 1990.
10
54 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
Unlike what it is for the international contentions, for
example the CRC, that, there is a special body established
to oversee the partner states’ implementation of the rights
enshrined in the Convention i.e. the Committee on the
Rights of the Child or the Committee of Experts on the
Rights and Welfare of the Child in Africa; there is no
formal mechanisms for reviewing implementation of the
above discussed UN standards and norms in individual
member states. It therefore takes a country’s individual
initiatives to absorb the standards set at the international
level to the domestic juvenile justice system.
4.3 Domestic Level
It is important to assess the application of international
standards on legal aid and administration of juvenile
offenders at the municipal level in Tanzania. This is due to
the country’s commitment to fulfilling the obligations she
vowed to undertake under the treaties signed and ratified.
The set standards and norms are commonly referred to as
“soft law” instruments, in the sense that they provide
guidance but are not legally binding to Tanzania given the
dualist nature of the country.
16Cap 13 R.E 2002 (repealed).
11
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 55
Marriage Act17, the Penal Code18, the Education Act19, the
Employment and Labour Relations Act20 and the
Criminal Procedure Act .
21
Foster Care Placement Regulations Government Notice Number 153 of 2012,
The Child Protection Regulations, 2015 Government Notice Number 11 of
2015, The Law of the Child (Apprenticeship) Regulations Government Notice
154 of 2012.
31
Rule 3 of the Law of the Child (Juvenile Court Procedure) Rules,2016,
Government Notice No.182 Published on 20th May 2016 define Guardian Ad
litem as a person who takes responsibility or is appointed to represent and
protect the interests of a child in a Juvenile Court proceeding. Similar
definition exists in the United States whereby Guardian Ad litem is defined as
adult person appointed by the court to represent a child's interests in judicial
proceeding. (The phrase means "Guardian at Law"), in some jurisdictions
called the "Next Friend. “
15
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 59
for the procedure and eligibility for being appointed as
Guardian Ad litem.32
It should be noted Guardian Ad litem is not a replacement
to professional advocates, but a cadre opted in the event it
has been impracticable to offer free legal representation to
the child and the child cannot afford to hire a private legal
practitioner. This makes it a point for the authors of this
article to call upon and remind practicing advocates of
their moral duty to give back to the community by making
themselves available for service in the existing Pro bono
Schemes33 whereby they will get an opportunity to
provide legal aid to the needy including juvenile
offenders. This call is made from the perspective that, the
number of children found in conflict with the law is
increasing and some are accused of capital offenses whose
proceedings involve technical legal matters requiring
qualified advocate to handle.
4.3.4 Judicature and Application of Laws (Practice and
Procedure in Cases involving Vulnerable Groups),
Rules, 2019 Government Notice No. 110 Published
on 1st February 2019
As a result of the ongoing initiatives in transforming the
Tanzanian Judiciary to become more citizens centric
promulgation of these Rules through mandate conferred
to the Chief Justice to make Rules for swift administration
of justice was made possible. The Rules are made to cater
32
Jones J., An analysis of the Situation of Children in the Juvenile Justice
System in Tanzania, Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Women Lawyers Association,
2019, at p. 54.
33
Tanzania Women Lawyers Association (TAWLA) and Tanganyika Law
Society have existing and operational Pro Bono Schemes.
16
60 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
for the needs of vulnerable groups which under Rule 3 are
stated to include children. The Rules require provision of
legal aid in proceedings involving vulnerable groups
whereby under Rule 10, it is stated that:
...in any civil or criminal matter, when it appears
to the presiding judge or magistrate that in the
interest of justice, a person with vulnerability
should have legal aid, that judge or magistrate
shall cause such person to obtain legal aid in
accordance with the Legal Aid Act.
34
Act No.1 of 2017.
35Legal Aid Regulations, 2018 Government Notice No.44 Published on 9th
February, 2018 The Legal Aid (Remuneration of Advocates) Rules, 2019
Government Notice No 109 of 2019.
36Act No. 21 of 1969.
17
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 61
legislations were aiding provision of legal services to
indigents in matters of criminal nature.
Since then initiatives to make sure comprehensive legal
aid service coordinated and available to those in need
have been gradually put in place. For instance the
National Legal Aid Forum in Tanzania held in November
2010 resolved and proposed to the government that: (a) a
national legal aid scheme should be established as a
hybrid model that includes both the public and private
sector; (b) an autonomous, independent legal aid
regulatory body should be established; (c) the position
and roles of legal aid providers including paralegals
should be clarified; and (d) the day-to-day running of the
independent legal aid regulatory body should be
independent of the government but the latter should
provide any support required. The government then
resolved to enact a comprehensive law on the Mainland
Tanzania on legal aid service provision within the
country, which also recognizes paralegals in the country.37
This resulted to enactment of the Legal Aid Act and its
Regulations in 2017, 2018 and 2019 respectively. That
being the case enactment of this law in 2017 was not a bolt
out of the blue.
Preceding sections of this article have articulated in details
international and regional norms and standard as well as
principal and subsidiary domestic legislations establishing
provision of legal aid as a necessary right to juvenile
offenders. Before making review on how the Legal Aid
37
Ngaiza C., et al, “Towards Coordinated Legal Aid Service in Tanzania,” The
Tanzania Legal Aid Journal, Vol.1, No.1, pp.85-118, at p. 89.
18
62 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
Act safeguard provision of legal aid services to juvenile
offenders, it is also important to take note of provisions of
Section 310 of the Criminal Procedure Act, procedural law
governing criminal proceedings which recognize a right to
defence through an Advocate.
Section 35 of the Legal Aid Act establishes an obligation to
a person charged with a duty to supervise welfare of the
child or in execution of his duties deals with a child who
has come into a conflict with the law to cause such child to
obtain legal aid immediately. Further, the Act under
Section 36 require Police Force or Prisons Services to
designate mechanism to ensure provision of legal aid
services to people accused or convicts in custody. It
however a fact that, the Law of the Child Act38 does not
allow custodial sentences to children but still, there are
children brought under the care of prisons facilities39.
With this understanding, Tanzania Prisons services issued
a child protection policy and procedures for children who
are under the custody of its facilities. The policy precisely
indicates that, every child shall have access to legal advice
and assistance.
5 Observation
Reading the preceding sections of this article one may note
that, in Tanzania an advocate, lawyer or paralegal provide
legal assistance to the needy in line with the laid down
rules and procedures. In making sure legal assistance is
made available to juvenile offenders through use of
38
Section 120 of the Law of the Child Act. (R.E 2019)
39
Ibid Section 119 (1).
19
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 63
traditional legal aiders40, another cadre Guardian Ad litem
is also recognized to represent a juvenile offender in
circumstance where a juvenile cannot afford to hire an
advocate or use the service of a legal aid provider. This is
one of the milestones to be celebrated. The department of
social welfare in each district within the country has been
tasked to recruit persons fit to act as Guardians Ad litem
under the Guardian Ad litem scheme. A special guide has
been adopted to regulate these services.
In the course of reviewing domestic principal and
subsidiary legalisations it can be observed that, the
Tanzanian legal framework extensively provides for a
right to legal representation to juvenile offenders and put
in place necessary procedures and coordination. It has also
considered the laid down international and regional
standards and norms on rights to children specifically
juvenile offenders. However, there are still in place some
flaws in the legal framework and deficiencies in
coordination of key stakeholders involved in juvenile
justice which hinder effective realization of access to
justice to juvenile offenders. Thus, there is a room for
improvement.
Standard and norms established in international and
regional instruments on children rights which has inspired
Tanzania domestic legislation on children rights require
children accused of criminal offences to be availed legal or
other appropriate assistance.41 Also, such instruments
emphasise that, whenever appropriate and desirable,
40
Advocates, Lawyer or Paralegal as circumstance allows.
41
Article 40 (2) (iii) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
20
64 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
measures for dealing with such children without resorting
to judicial proceedings should be promoted42 as an
alternative of diversionary programs. Hitherto, Tanzania
Law of the Child Act is lacking this important aspect
though it prohibits custodial sentences.
6. Conclusion
The foregoing discussions indicate a right to legal aid
services to juvenile offenders in Tanzania has been stirred
by various international and regional standards and
norms. Established by the Constitution and for smooth
implementation of that right, several principal and
subsidiary legislations have been enacted. These are
commendable efforts although an assessment on access to
this service by this group and the quality thereof should
remain a priority.
7. Recommendations.
(a) To the community
Prevention of juvenile delinquency is an essential part of
crime prevention in society. By engaging young persons in
social useful activities and monitoring their behaviour at
home, at school and in the streets, can develop non-
criminogenic attitudes in them. This includes monitoring
their engagement in harmful social media platforms. Thus,
community members should put in place preventive
measures to avoid children involvement in criminal
activities by upholding positive moral guidance.
Successful prevention of juvenile delinquency requires
efforts on the part of the entire society to ensure the
42
Ibid, Article 40 (3)(b).
21
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 65
harmonious development of adolescents, with respect for
and promotion of their personality from early childhood.
It is a universal fact that, provision of quality services is
determined by demand. When demand is high there is a
possibility of compromising quality. Legal aid service to
juvenile offenders might not be an exception in this;
therefore, preventing juvenile delinquency at the
community level is more appropriate.
22
66 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
situation indicates the presence of possible limitations and
challenges on the part of social welfare department in
executing its duties as required by the law in the chain of
justice delivery. For instance, in the case of Furaha Johnson
v. Republic 43 the Appellant a minor charged with rape
before the District Court of Moshi had unsatisfactory trial
whereas he was convicted and sentenced to life
imprisonment. Aggrieved with the decision he
unsuccessfully appealed to the High Court, hence, the
appealed to the Court of Appeal. During hearing of the
Appeal, it was indicated that, despite the fact that the
Appellant was a child under the provisions of the Law of
the Child Act, his trial before the trial court was conducted
in the absence of the Social Welfare Officer contrary to the
requirements of provisions of Section 99 (1) (d) of the Act.
The Court nullified the Appellant’s trial, conviction and
sentence, and proceeded to quash and set them aside.
Moreover, the Court ordered the immediate release from
prison of the Appellant, who had been under custody for
almost six (6) years, unless he is otherwise lawfully held. It
was held further presence of a Social Welfare Officer is
one of the conditions precedents for conducting valid
criminal proceedings against an accused child whereas the
requirement is mandatory and if not observed incurable.
Possible causes of limitations resulting to this kind of
miscarriage of justice might require a thorough study to
address the same. However more importantly, adequate
resources allocation might be a quick remedy to the
situation. Measures should be put in place to coordinate
43
Criminal Appeal No. 452 of 2015, the Court of Appeal of Tanzania at
Arusha, (Unreported)
23
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 67
key stakeholders relevant to the criminal justice system to
ensure all appropriate assistance including legal aid is
availed to juveniles not only in urban, but also in rural or
remote areas.
(e) To Government
Further amendment to some laws is still a necessity that
goes along with ensuring their implementation. The Law
of the Child Act needs to be amended to incorporate
diversion programs to children accused of criminal
offences whenever appropriate without resorting to
judicial proceedings. This is not only for proper
rehabilitation of the child and deterrent of criminogenic
attitude on part of young person, but also, it will relieve
24
68 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
the judicial system with backlog of cases involving
juvenile offenders with petty offenses. Also, to cover the
gap on availability of social welfare officers, the law
should be amended to recognize the cadre of para-social
welfare officers at least at the stage of crime investigation
involving juveniles. This should go hand in hand with the
guide to identify necessary skills required and procedures
on their recruitment.
25
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 69
A LEGAL AIDER VIS-À-VIS QUALITY LEGAL AID
SERVICES: A PEEK OF EXPERIENCE
Cecilia Ngaiza*
Abstract
This article fits the legal aid platform as it targets legal aid providers
in mainland Tanzania and beyond. The provision of legal aid is
perpetual so long as the quest to attain effective access to justice for all
is up and running in the country. The author addresses the rather less
addressed issue of legal aiders’ encounters with an objective to
captivating their exceptional role in the legal aid field. This is an
experience-based article by a former legal aid officer discussing a
representative rudimentary state of legal aiders while highlight issues
with the potentiality to enhance the quality of legal aid provision in
the country. The article thrives to strike a balance between the existing
conducive legal aid policy and legislative environment on one hand
and the practical aspects of legal aid provision on the other hand. It
goes without saying that, one of the vital elements to accessing justice
via legal aid is having efficient individuals providing such services.
The article touches the legal aiders’ wellbeing to redirect the
stakeholders’ focus on this crucial aspect of legal aid provision.
Key words: legal aid services, legal aid provider, legal aid
officer/aider, legal aid client
*Assistant Lecturer, University of Dar es Salaam School of Law, LL.B (2014) &
1 Section 3 of the Legal Aid Act, 2017 defines an advocate as referred to by the
Advocates Act, Cap 341 of the Laws of Tanzania, as a person whose name has
been dully entered upon the Roll of advocates, a lawyer as a holder of
bachelor of laws degree or its equivalent, and a paralegal as a person
accredited and certified to provide legal aid after receiving a specialized
training or has qualified to be a paralegal by two years experience or holding
other qualifications provided for under section 19 of the same Act (bachelor
degree in any other discipline than law, diploma or certificate from a
accredited institution or any certificate of secondary education) and
subsequently undergone a qualification training prior to the commencement
of the Act.
2 Section 24 of the Legal Aid Act, id, stresses on the point that advocates,
4The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) through its Legal Assistance Committee
and Human Rights Centre, Women Legal Aid Centre (WLAC), Women in
Law and Development in Africa (WiLDAF);the Disabled Organization for
Legal Affairs and Social Economic Development (DOLASED); Lawyers
Environmental Action Tanzania (LEAT) and Legal and Human Rights Centre
(LHRC).
3
72 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
services in the country.7 The foregoing legal expertise
challenge has however to a great extent been addressed by
the Act which has brought into place more coordination in
the legal aid field in Tanzania. Financial challenges are
still tackled via external donor funds and internal
donations by among others, charitable organisations,
though the assistance offered is not sufficient. One of the
crucial setbacks to delivering quality legal aid services
which has often been given less attention, associates with
the legal aid officers’ internal and external prevailing
circumstances affecting their service delivery. Before
embarking into such circumstances, it is important to first
discuss the benefits that an advocate, lawyer or paralegal
gains by offering to be of service to the legal indigent
persons.
Not only do the clients admitted for legal aid in legal aid
clinics have varying legal problems, for example,
matrimonial, probate, civil, land, civil, tort and labour
cases; but also, the same category of cases contains
varying facts. This is undeniably an enormous practical
exposure for legal aiders to a vast area of ground
experience.
page 15. It is however important to note that, the number of clients attending
these offices is not evenly distributed due to varying circumstances in each
region, for instance, cultural practices, stereo types and infrastructural
conditions.
10 See Van Zyl CH. IV and Visser J., “Legal Ethics, Rules of Conduct and the
6
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 75
skills to determine the client’s eligibility for such aid
without having the client feeling interrogated or
discriminated from the service.11 This requires an
additional skill than directly posing a question as to what
amount the client earns or whether he or she is at all
engaged in any financial activity. Furthermore, it is upon a
legal aid officer’s ability to act with care, for example,
meandering his or her way to determining whether the
potential client is physically disabled or mentally stable,
perhaps by a kind gesture of a brief fictitious story or
statement connecting to the question intended. This is
rather gentle than strictly asking the client “are you
physically disabled?” or “do you have any children?”
without knowing whether such client is or is not with an
ability to bear children at all. Clients’ examination is the
best ground to practice “watch your tongue principle”.
This skill is essential to place both the legal aider and the
client in a sustained and harmonious interaction
throughout the case.
Past the eligibility test, the legal aid officer thrives with
tactics to ensure the client that, the services he or she is
exposed to do not attract any financial or other materials’
obligations and, the same equals in quality with the one he
or she could have received from a private paid legal
practitioner. This is a very important stage of attending a
client. It clears doubts from the indigent person of the
nature of service he or she is about to receive. The step
11 Each legal aid provider has its style of determining the potential aided
person’s eligibility. Section 21 (3) of the Act provides that legal aid by a
potential legal aided person should be assessed according to each legal aid
provider’s procedures. This is often done through a client admission form
which a client fills, sometimes with a legal aid provider’s assistance.
7
76 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
invites to the client’s mind readiness to cooperate with the
legal aid officer in the next stages of the case, something
which also makes the legal aid officer’s work easier. As
much as the foregoing stage attracts distinguished skills to
set the client for the case, the expertise to extract and
analyse relevant facts from the client as well as responding
to his or her needs is to be effectively exercised so as to
balance time intervals between one client and another.
Some legal aid clients may have suffered severe injustices
and went through prolonged procedures before landing
on the hands of legal aid providers. This is often due to
ignorance of the law or legal procedures to follow. The
narration of one client’s story may consume quite a long
time to only realize at the end that, the cause of action
narrated has been overtaken by events and is incurable.
This is an invitation to a legal aid officer to demonstrate a
high level of tactics to balance the client’s and legal aid
provider’s interests, i.e. advising an alternative path
versus avoiding misuse of legal aid provider’s services to
prolong legal procedures particularly, litigation.
8
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 77
coming into terms with the legal aid clients. The legal
aider may also warn him or herself from falling into
financial temptations on the way. This paves a way to
securing legal aid clients’ interests in negotiations or
reconciliations, at the same time, earning the legal aid
officer’s skills in such area of dispute settlement.
3.1 Compassion
11
80 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
3.2 Commitment
3.3 Time
14 For example, when the author was working with TAWLA, Tuesdays and
Thursdays were special slotted days for receiving client’s feedbacks from the
Court, land tribunals, marriage conciliatory boards, banks, social welfare
offices et cetera.
12
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 81
law may require additional time to re-train them on what
they have been previously trained as a matter of
refreshing their memories. This is because, having a
layman able to present his or her case in a focused manner
in court requires mastery of his or her anxiety, fear and
discomforts; such mastery calls for repeated actions of
coaching, encouragement and progress review. Moreover,
before filing documents in court, a legal aid officer holds a
duty to translate and explain to the legal aid client the
content of what is presented in such documents before
dispatching them. This exercise is time-consuming;
however, very important to enable the client to follow
closely the procedures of his or her case. Generally,
sufficient time is needed to meet the needs of the
blossoming number of indigent persons seeking to access
justice via legal aid. The said blossom is necessitated by
the number of successful cases handled by legal aid
providers15 and the increased active interaction of
paralegals with the community and other legal aid
providers. Paralegals play a great role in referring cases
that they cannot handle to other legal aid providers for
example cases calling for legal representation or involving
drafting of legal documents.16
3.4 Perseverance
15 Legal aided persons have the tendency of bringing or directing to legal aid
providers more indigent persons in need of legal aid specifically when they
matters have successfully been handled by the relevant legal aid providers.
16 Section 20 (5) of the Legal Aid Act prohibits paralegals to engage in
17It should be noted that, not all legal aided persons get an opportunity to be
legally represented in judicial bodies due to scarcity of number of advocates
volunteering to offer such service. Hence, most of them are trained to
represent themselves in Courts of law.
14
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 83
4.0 Noticing the Red Flags
18A quote by a famous late global philanthropist Mother Theresa (20.08. 1910-
05.09.1997)
15
84 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
some of the incidents narrated by the client. For example,
a family breakup, loss of property, unfair termination
from employment, child violence or physical assault. The
fact that such experience may be resurfacing in the legal
aid officer’s mind as he or she keeps receiving clients with
a similar story to tell, may lead him or her to emotional
instability. This may result in the legal aider’s failure to
sustain his service with stability or approach client’s cases
with pre-existing inclinations. This jeopardizes the client’s
case as the legal aid officer’s ability to rationally extract
facts from the client, provide immediate guidance or
decide on the step forward becomes clouded with how
things transpired on his or her historical part. If this
continues to be the legal aid officer’s prevailing
circumstances in the provision of legal aid, the officer may
be emotionally wounded culminating to a gradual severe
compromised service
4.3 Prejudicing
4.4 Overwhelming
17
86 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
others, the aforementioned existing unbalanced ratio
between the available legal aid providers and the demand
for legal aid services in the country. With the ratio of one
legal aid officer attending six to eight clients a day, a
backlog of work may automatically be positioned on a
single person. This is especially when the same person is
to prepare legal documents, represent clients in courts,
train clients for self-representation, reconcile adverse
parties and keeps admitting new clients. The picture
version of this may sound like pumping gas into the
balloon without expecting the same to burst at its elastic
limit. Such overwhelm of work may result in
mismanagement of clients’ attendance routine, delay in
filing of cases in the respective forums or frequent
postponement of appointments with clients. With these
circumstances at hand, skipping of meals and burning of
midnight oil becomes “a new normal” to legal aiders
while darkening the red to the flag of their compromised
ability to offer legal aid
5.1 Retreats
18
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 87
clients. The officer may opt to give him or herself some
time off; rests, reflects and regroups, when it becomes
evident that he or she is experiencing mental drainage or
emotional instability, having absorbed so much than his or
her ability to bear from the working environment. A legal
aid provider should not feel guilty for embarking on this
damage control mechanism. Such self-help move will
enable him or her to return back to work mentally and
physically strong with vigour to proceed with offering
quality services to legal aid clients. This bold move is
however difficult to some officers especially when they
had formed a particular bond with their clients; whereby,
it sounds difficult to break from meeting them and
chasing the progress of their cases. This is actually a good
practice, but should not cost the legal aid provider’s
wellbeing to take some time off.
21
90 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
consumed by the fact that his desperation after stepping
into the client’s shoes has actually suffocated the justice
sought. Justice hurried, justice buried.
5.5 Organise
25
94 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
be, “the swapping positions test” between the potential
legal aider and the indigent persons. This teaches the
potential or the incumbent legal aider of how important
and humane it is when one extends a hand in times of
utmost need without having to expect anything in return.
26
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 95
persons, periodic, well organized and affordable retreats
like office weekends getaways, hiking, physical exercises
may be preferred to freshen up legal aiders’ minds and get
to share challenges and ways forward in the course of
delivering services to the clients. This strategy may also
play a role of reducing “the in between working hours
story tellings” amongst themselves also repairs any
broken good relationships or communication amongst
themselves. Likewise, one on one or group mentorship
sessions may be organized whereby, the experienced legal
aid officers get to mentor the incoming ones at the office
level. This may again act as unofficial orientation seminars
that not all the legal aid providers may afford. For
example, the legal aid providers like the Tanganyika Law
Society or the Tanzania Women Lawyers Association who
are membership based, may volunteer some of their
experienced members to mentor and train the young
volunteers in the field within and outside their clinics.
6.4 Stakeholders
27
96 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
provider is overloaded by clients or inability to solve a
particular problem, the other legal aid provider may
assist. This applies mostly with the paralegals who may
face several cases calling for legal drafting of documents
or court’s representation. When there is a necessity to
transfer clients to the nearest legal aid provider from
where the client lives or can easily access the court, such
transfer should be advised and supported to save the
clients’ costs and time to travel a long distance seeking for
legal aid in an away stationed legal aid provider.
7.0 Conclusion
29
98 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS IN ACTION: APPROACHES,
AND PRACTICES ON WOMEN’S LEGAL
EMPOWERMENT IN TANZANIA
Dr Francis M. Magare ∗
Abstract
While the law is an essential tool for advancing women's and girls’
rights and equality, a robust and effective “legal system” based on the
rule of law is central in assisting women to become equal partners in
decision-making and development. The notion of judicial systems in
action with regarded approaches, and best practices in this context, is
responding onto to the roles of the judicial machinery in the process.
The role of the judicial system in advancing the rule of law and access
to justice is immensely vast. This paper revisits various approaches to
women empowerment in Tanzania. Taking various cases in Tanzania
with a comparison with some other countries in Africa it is direct that
the judiciary has established a robust precedent with approaches to
legal empowerment generally and specifically women’s legal
empowerment. These manifest in judicial activism and utilization of
various legal empowerment bearings. The vastness of the plight of
women with marginalization born in the legal framework, the absence
of specialized family courts within the judiciary and bearing of law
embracing customary rules are among practical gaps against which
much more engagement is wanting.
1 See, for example, various cases cited in TWJA, “Divergent Paths: Family
Social, Relations, Gender and Law” in the Gender Bench Book on Management of
Gender-Based Violence and Violence Against Women and Children, (2019) (Draft
Copy in the custody of the Author) pg 105- 114
2 Example in Bernado s/o Ephraim vs. Holaria d/o Pastory [1990] TLR 106;
3 See, IDLO, Access to Justice: Models Practices and Best Practices on Women’s
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29498 License: CC BY
3.0 IGO.
5 See, WILDAF, Inception Report on Wanawake Sasa Project to (in the custody
Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171,
article 26; See also McDougal, Myres S., and Gerhard Bebr. “Human Rights in
the United Nations” American Journal of International Law 58, no. 3 (1964): 603–
41
7 IDLO, supra (n) 3; also WiLDAF Tanzania, Rule of Law and Access to
Justice, infra
4
102 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
Report 20198 attest to the progress towards gender equality
over the past decades. The Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) Social Institutions
and Gender Index found out that of the 112 countries
scored in 2012, 86 had discriminatory laws or practices
concerning property and inheritance.9
8 WBG, Women, Business and Law Report; A decade of Reforms, New York
12 Klugman, J., Background paper for World Development Report 2017 Gender based
Violence, Fair Trial Rights and the Rights of Victims Challenges in Using Law and
Justice Systems Faced by Women Human Rights Defenders, Geneva: ICJ (2015) pg
33
14 C A Odinkalu, ‘Poor Justice or Justice for the Poor? A Policy Framework for
Tanzania RE 2002, a similar view reflected in various case laws, Maagi Kimito
V. Gibeno Werema, (1996) TLR 145 CAT being a worthy note.
18 HC Miscellaneous Civil Cause No. 82 of 2005 (unreported)
7
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 105
matrimonial home according to the rules of the customary
law of one Haya tribe. The High Court of Tanzania
dismissed the case and advised the parties to seek other
administrative alternatives in what it said, “The fear to
open Pandora box”. The Committee on Elimination of
Racial Discrimination against Women, (CEDAW) in 2015
on a communication arising from this case did find
Tanzania in violation of her treaty obligation.19
19 In the Communication No. 48/2013, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/60/D/48/2013
criminal cases
9
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 107
Tanzania’s Judiciary has responded to the needs of the
vulnerable groups of the society, inclusive of women and
children victims of GBV and all sorts of prejudices by the
Chief Justice promulgating the Judicature and Application
of Laws (Practice and Procedure of Cases Involving
Vulnerable Groups Rules, 2019. 23
23 G.N. No. 110 dated 1st February 2019
24 Ibid, Rule 3
25 See, ibid, Rule 2
10
108 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
within which the suits need to be finalized i.e. not more
than six months from commencement. Hearing of the
cases is subject to high priority. The rules direct and legal
aid to vulnerable groups is assured.26
The High Court of Tanzania has for the first time in the
case of Alliance One Tobacco Tanzania Ltd and
another v. Mwajuma Hamisi and another30 noted that “it is
26 see, Ibid, Rules 4,5, and 10
27 The principle is established vides the Written Law Miscellaneous
Amendments Act Act No. 3 of 2018, section 6
28 ibid
29See, Article 107A(2)(e)
30 MSc. Civil Application No. 803 of 2018 (unreported)
11
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 109
currently the law of the land that courts should uphold the
overriding objective of the law, avoid and disregard minor
irregularities and unnecessary technicalities to achieve
substantive justice”.31
31 Ibid, pg 3; Similar position was reiterated in Gaspar Peter v. Mtwara Urban
12
110 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
objections. It stated that the principle was ‘not meant to
enable parties to circumvent the mandatory rules of the
Court or to turn blind to the mandatory provisions of the
procedural law which go to the foundation of the case.’36
36 Ibid at pg 23; similar position was reiterated in in Mondorosi Village
Council and 2 Others v. TBL and 4 Others in Civil Appeal No. 66 of 2017 (at
Arusha) (Unreported) and Martin Kumalija & 117 Others v. Iron and Steel Ltd
(Civil Application No. 70/18 of 2018) (at Dar) (Unreported)
37 Payel R. C, (2011) Judicial Activism and Human Rights in India: a critical
13
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 111
It is true, the judiciary of various states have shed its pro-
status-quo approach and has taken upon itself the duty to
enforce the basic rights of women as vulnerable sections of
society by progressive interpretation and positive action.
Several cases exist to this effect in most states, in the usual
contextual chestnut, Tanzania inclusive.39
against the Tanzania Constitutional setup and human rights provisions of the
same.
40 Chapter 29 of the Laws of Tanzania Revised Edition of 2002, see section
Vander Goes, (Civil Appeal No. 127 of 2011) Court of Appeal of Kenya (see
the cited authorities therein)
42 See, the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, Article 45(3) This provides that parties
to a marriage are entitled to equal rights at the time of the marriage during the
marriage and at the dissolution of the marriage” and other laws promulgated
14
112 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
Very appreciative of jurisprudence, the Court of Appeal of
Tanzania in Bi Hawa Mohamed vs. Ally Sefu43 one of the
landmark decisions, did consider unpaid housework to
constitute a contribution to matrimonial assets in
Tanzania. Despite not providing clear guidelines on the
value of the contribution made by doing domestic work or
efforts in regards. It is in the record, following this
decision; the court has progressed to protect women’s
rights in the division of matrimonial assets, a
demonstration of empowerment in multiple ways, though
not consistently.
Salaam(Unreported)
15
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 113
In addition to her domestic work, the appellant engaged
herself in the sale of buns and vegetables.46
46 ibid
47 (1988) TLR 197 (HC)
48 Matrimonial Appeal No. 1 of 2010, High Court Iringa Registry (unreported)
49 ibid
50 See various cases at TAWJA, supra
16
114 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
In all of the favourable decision for empowerment, the
court has been consistent in invoking the human rights
standard of equality and reflection of the same in the
constitutional setup. How that took place aligns with the
very fact that the court in its judicial accord, valve the
superiority of the constitution and contiguous human
rights obligations of the state.
51 See, Bernado s/o Ephraim vs. Holaria d/o Pastory, supra note 1
17
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 115
“derogation law extremely strictly”.52 Accepting a similar
line of reasoning, the Court has rejected both the
customary rules and Islamic rules that are gender-biased,
discriminatory and that maintain patriarchy.
52 See, Justice Augustino Ramadhani in the case of Transport Equipment Ltd and
(Unreported)
18
116 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
The court in the case of Naftal Joseph Kalalu v Angela
Mashirima54 did reflect the position in Elizabeth Mtawa.55 The
father of the deceased husband objected to the
appointment of his son’s wife as an administratrix of the
will. It was a contention that since both the deceased and
the respondent were the origin of one tribe called Chagga,
as applicable, the law, which was to the effect that on
succession and inheritance, women are not allowed to
administer wills.56 The High Court sternly, cited Articles
12 and 13 of the Constitution and Article 1 of CEDAW to
emphasize Tanzania’s commitment to ending gender-
based discrimination. It held that the mentioned Chagga
customary law would be discriminatory and that the
deceased’s wife would remain as an administratrix of the
will as a matter of right.57
54 P.C. Civil Appeal No. 145 of 2001, High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam
(Unreported)
55 Elizabeth Mtawa, supra note 53
56 Citing Para 20 of the Laws of Inheritance GN 436 of 1963
57 Ibid, at Pg 29
58 See, section 13(1) read together with section 17, of chapter 29 of the Laws of
Tanzania, supra
59
Civil Appeal No.204/2017 CAT at Dar es Salaam
19
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 117
The details of the case are that the respondent, one Rebeca
Z. Gyumi challenged the constitutionality of provisions of
the Law of Marriage Act. The said sections of the law
require the consent of parents or court for girls below 18
years before marriage and at the same time, allow a female
person to get married at the age of 15 years and a male
person to get married only upon attaining the age of 18
years. Thus, the respondent argued that the said
provisions offend the provisions of Articles 12, 13 and 18
of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania.60
article 13 Equality before the law and article 18 relevant for the freedom of
expression.
61 Ibid, pg 42
20
118 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
to marry. Besides, it cited article 1 of the Convention on
the Rights of the Child and Article 2 of the African Charter
on the Rights and Welfare of the Child both of which
define a child to mean every human being below the age
of 18. In Article 6 of Protocol to the African Charter on
Human and Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Women in
Africa, the court stressed the obligation that Tanzania has
to ensure that women and men enjoy equal rights and
regards as equal partners in marriage. They are also
required to enact appropriate national legislation to
guarantee that the minimum age of marriage for women
shall be 18 years.
21
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 119
4.1. Technical Dilemma born in Judicial Hierarchy
This is with a focus on the principle of binding precedent
manifesting on discriminatory statutory laws, notably the
customary rules do persist, and the case handling process
full of confusions especially in the subordinate
courts.62 More so, the non-predictability of the application
of the overriding objective principle as noted. There are
rampart conflicting decisions over similar rights in the
High Court and Court of appeal. Both of these higher
Courts in the judicial hierarchy in Tanzania have not been
consistent in the declaration of unconstitutionality of some
provisions of the Local Customary Declaration Order on
the questions of inheritance.
(unreported)
22
120 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 2020 1TLAJ1
law, which applied to the parties, makes no provision for a
widow to remain in the matrimonial home after her
husband dies. Rather, that the widow had the choice of
residing with and under the support by her children or a
selected male relative of her husband to "inherit" her and
whom thereby assumes the responsibility for supporting
her. The Court ordered the widow to leave the house and
advised her to live with her daughter.65
65 A similar trend is in the reflection in Rubuka Nteme v Bi. Jalia Hassan &
Experiences and Lessons Learned, New York: Justice and Development Working
Group, 2013, pg 34
23
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 121
broader development constraints, such as the need for
more effective access to justice. Studies from various
jurisdictions, the United States, Australia, and other
countries have shown that specialization can help improve
the processing of court cases that are more complex or
require “special expertise” beyond the law, such as in
cases whose handling is quite different and which reflect
the needs of a particular court user group, such as family
matters.
5. Exit: Conclusion
67 ISSAT,Developing Specialized Court Services: International Experiences
25
1TLAJ1 2020 The Tanzania Legal Aid Journal 123
TANZANIA LEGAL AID JOURNAL
AUTHOR’S GUIDELINES
1)
General
a. All title headings for the articles, case comments and book
reviews should be in capital letters and bolded.
b. Subtitles should be in Arabic numbers e.g. 1. Introduction
if the article does not have subtitles within the titles and if
there are sub titles then it should be e.g.:
3.0 An Overview on Criminal Law
3.1 Tanzania Penal Code
2.2 Criminal Procedure Code
c. Name of the author should be capitalized in each first letter
of the name with a* after the name.
d. There should be an abstract on each paper and should not
exceed 250 words. This does not apply to case notes and
book reviews.
e. The heading of the abstract should be in italic form and
bolded and indented on the left side below the name of the
author.
f. The abstract should be in Book Antiqua with 11 font size.
g. There should be four Key Words for every article manuscript
below the abstract.
h. The manuscript shall be typed in Book Antiqua, (Font
size 12 and for footnotes it should be font size 10), 1.5 line
spacing.
2) Originality
The submission must be an original work of the contributor
and must not have been submitted for publication elsewhere,
unless an approval is obtained from both the author and the
publisher of the original work.
4) Paper Range
i. Comment articles
Manuscripts for comment articles analyzing and commenting
on recent cases, legislation and other topical matters must
range between 1500 and 3000 words. No footnote shall
be allowed in comment articles. References, case citation,
legislation and relevant literature should appear in brackets in
the main text. All comment articles should be accompanied by
a short abstract not exceeding 50 words. The comment must
bear the following headings:-
• Title (descriptive)
• Name/Citation of relevant case/legislation/material
• Legal context
• Facts
• Analysis
• Practical significance
5) Mode of Sending
Manuscripts should preferably be sent by email. If the
manuscript is not sent by e-mail it shall be submitted in both
hard copy and electronic format in a flash-disk, or other similar
storage device and shall be in MS Word.:
Secretary, Research and Publications Committee,
Tanganyika Law Society,
Plot No. 391, Chato Street, Regent Estate,
P.O. Box 2148, DAR ES SALAAM
E-mail: publication@tls.or.tz