TAURY GROUP

TG0001 - Retaining Wall Analysis

Being Limitless

Jl. Rungkut Harapan Blok G No.7, Rungkut, Surabaya, Indonesia.

TAURY GROUP
TG - 0001 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................................................2

A. ENVIRONTMENT INFORMATION.......................................................................................3
A.1 SOIL CONDITION........................................................................................................................3

B. RETAINING WALL INFORMATION.....................................................................................3

B.1 DIMENSION................................................................................................................................3
B.2 MATERIAL..................................................................................................................................3

C. WORK FORCE CONFIGURATION.......................................................................................4

C.1 RESISTANCE FORCE...................................................................................................................4
C.2 EXTERNAL ACTIVE FORCE.........................................................................................................4

D. RETAINING WALL STABILITY ANALYSIS.......................................................................5

D.1 OVERTURNING...........................................................................................................................5
D.2 SLIDING.....................................................................................................................................5

E. SOIL PRESSURE ANALYSIS...................................................................................................6

F. RETAINING WALL STRENGTH ANALYSIS.......................................................................6

F.1 MATERIAL PROPERTIES..............................................................................................................6
F.2 WORK FORCES CONFIGURATION...............................................................................................6
F.3 BENDING STRESS........................................................................................................................7
F.4 CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................7
F.5 AFTER UPGRADING RADIUS.......................................................................................................8

TAURY GROUP 2
TAURY GROUP
TG - 0001 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

A. Environtment Information

A.1 Soil Condition

Properties Value Units

Soil Location : Manado
Soil Type : Lempung (Clay) - Normal Consolidated (NC)
Specific Gravity : 1.865 Ton/m^3
Kohesi : 1.223 Ton/m^3
Sudut Geser Dalam : 24.2 Degrees

B. Retaining Wall Information

B.1 Dimension

Properties Value Units

Total Height : 8 meters
Total Diameter : 0.2286 m
Volume : 0.33 m^3

B.2 Material

Properties Value Units

Agregat Kasar : Batu Ape
Agregat Halus : Pasir Bunne
Umur Beton : 28 Days
Specific Gravity : 2.061 Ton/m^3
Pressure Maximum : 12.7 MPa (Ton/m^2)
Elastic Modulus : 18527 MPa (Ton/m^2)

TAURY GROUP 3
TAURY GROUP
TG - 0001 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

C. Work Force Configuration

C.1 Resistance Force

Value XOG ZOG

Properties
(Ton/m) (m) (m)
Retaining Wall : 3.677 0.112 4.000
Passive Soil : 44.246 0.000 1.198
Total : 47.923 0.009 1.106

C.2 External Active Force

Value XOG ZOG

Properties
(Ton/m) (m) (m)
Active Soil : 14.690 0.000 1.412

TAURY GROUP 4
TAURY GROUP
TG - 0001 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

D. Retaining Wall Stability Analysis

D.1 Overturning

Resistance Moments (RM)

Retaining Wall : 0.412 Ton
Passive Soil : 53.007 Ton
Total : 53.419 Ton

External Active Moments (EAM)

Active Soil : 20.742 Ton

Result
Formula : RM / EAM
Attained Value : 2.575
Requirement Value : 2
Status : Compliance

D.2 Sliding

Resistance Force (RF)

Retaining Wall : 3.677 Ton / m
Friction Coefficient : 0.214
Passive Soil Force : 44.246 Ton / m
Result : 45.033 Ton

External Active Force (EAF)

Active Soil : 14.690 Ton / m

Result
Formula : RF / EAF
Attained Value : 3.066

TAURY GROUP 5
TAURY GROUP
TG - 0001 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Requirement Value : 2
Status : Compliance

E. Soil Pressure Analysis

Max. Pressure Soil Received : 30.121 Ton /m^2

Retaining Wall Given Pressure : 16.489 Ton/m^2
Max. Retaining Wall Pressure
: 20.319 Ton/m^2
(Possibility)
Min. Retaining Wall Pressure
: 16.045 Ton/m^2
(Possibility)
Result : Compliance

F. Retaining Wall Strength Analysis

F.1 Material Properties

Properties Value Units

Agregat Kasar : Batu Ape
Agregat Halus : Pasir Bunne
Umur Beton : 28 Days
Specific Gravity : 2.061 Ton/m^3
Pressure Maximum : 12.7 MPa (Ton/m^2)
Elastic Modulus : 18527 MPa (Ton/m^2)

F.2 Work Forces Configuration

ZOG
Work Force List Value (Ton/m) XOG (m)
(m)
Active Force 14.690 0.000 1.412
Passive Force 44.246 0.000 1.198
Weight of the Retaining Wall 3.677 0.000 4
TAURY GROUP 6
TAURY GROUP
TG - 0001 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

F.3 Bending Stress

The analysis uses Nastran Patran software, which afterward also be validated using manual
calculation. According to the given forces (active and passive forces, the pile will be obtained
pressure about 78 MPa.

F.4 Conclusion

According to the bending stress maximum that may occur at the pile, I am confident to say
that the material concrete that is used would not sufficient to received the possibility
maximum forces. Hence, I strongly recommend to upgrade the radius to at least 213 mm
(Diameter = 426 mm = 16,8 Inch)

TAURY GROUP 7
TAURY GROUP
TG - 0001 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

F.5 After Upgrading Radius

According to the calculation and simulation software, after the diamater is changed to
be 426 mm ( about 16,8 Inch), the material would have bending stress at around 1,21 x
10^4 kPa (12,1 MPa), which is locating at 1,2 meters above the ground. This bending
stress would be sufficient enough for the using material which has maximum bending
stress capacity in 12,7 MPa.

TAURY GROUP 8