Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plagiarism - Report-2
Plagiarism - Report-2
oor Maintenance fig 3,18 A structure needs to be maintained after lapse of certain
period from its construction completion, Some structures may need very early look into
their deterioration problems, while others can sustain themselves very well for many
years depending on quality of design and construction, Regular external painting of
building to some extent helps in protecting building against moisture and other
chemical attacks, Water-proofing and protective coating on reinforcement steel or
concrete are all second line of defense and success of their protection will greatly
depend on quality of concrete, Leakages should be attended to at earliest possible
before corrosion of steel inside concrete starts and sapling of concrete takes place,
Spalled concrete will lose its strength and stiffness, besides; it will increase rate of
corrosion as rusted steel bars are now fully exposed to aggressive environment, It is not
only essential to repair deteriorated concrete but it is equally important to prevent
moisture and aggressive chemicals to enter concrete and prevent further deterioration,
M, Indiscriminate addition and alternations There have been some building collapses in
our country due to indiscriminate additions and alterations done by interior decorators
at instance of their clients, Generally, first target of modifications is balcony, Due to
requirement to occupy more floor area, balconies are generally enclosed and modified
for different usages, Balconies and canopies are generally cantilever RCC slabs, Due to
additional loading they deflect and develop cracks, As steel reinforcement in these slabs
have less concrete cover and balcony and canopy slab is exposed to more aggressive
external environment, corrosion of steel reinforcement takes place and repairs become
necessary, The loft tanks are generally installed in toilets or kitchens, which are humid
areas of buildings, structure in addition to being overloaded is also more prone to
corrosion of reinforcement steel in these areas and therefore deteriorates and if not
repaired, part of building can even collapse, N, Creep Concrete when subjected to
sustained loading exhibits gradual and slow time dependant deformation known as
creep, Creep increases with increase in water and cement content, water cement ratio
and temperature, It decreases with increase in humidity of surrounding atmosphere and
age of material at time of loading, Use of admixtures and puzzlonas in concrete
increases creep, Amount of creep in steel increases with rise in temperature, fig 3,19
TECHNIQUES TO CURE CRACKS Epoxy injection Epoxy injection is an economical
method of repairing non-moving cracks in concrete walls, slabs, columns and piers as it
is capable of restoring concrete to its precracked strength, technique generally consists
of establishing entry and venting ports at close intervals along cracks, sealing crack on
exposed surfaces, and injecting epoxy under pressure, Routing and Sealing In this
method, crack is made wider at surface with saw or grinder, and then groove is filled
with flexible sealant, This is common technique for crack treatment and it is relatively
simple in comparison to procedures and training required for epoxy injection, It can be
done on vertical surfaces and curved surface, Stitching This method is done to provide
permanent structural repairs solution for masonry repairs and cracked wall
reinforcement, It is done by drilling holes on both sides of crack, cleaning holes and
anchoring legs of staples in holes with non-shrink grout, D, Drilling and Plugging This
method is done to provide permanent structural repairs solution for masonry repairs
and cracked wall reinforcement, It is done by drilling holes on both sides of crack,
cleaning holes and anchoring legs of staples in holes with non-shrink grout, E, Gravity
Filling Low viscosity monomers and resins can be used to seal cracks with surface widths
of 0,001 to 0,08 in, by gravity filling, High molecular weight methacrylates, urethanes,
and some low viscosity epoxies have been used successfully, Dry Packing It is hand
placement of low water content mortar followed by tamping or ramming of mortar into
place and also helps in producing intimate contact between mortar and existing
concrete, Polymer Impregnation Monomer systems can be used for effective repair of
some cracks, monomer system is liquid consisting of monomers which will polymerize
into solid, The most common monomer used for this purpose is methyl methacrylate,
METHODOLOGY A, Repair of Cracks The repair of cracks can be achieved with following
techniques; 1) By epoxy-injection grouting 2) By routing and sealing 3) By flexible
sealing 4) By stitching 5) By providing additional reinforcement 6) By drilling and
plugging 7) By prestressing steel 8) By grouting 9) Dry packing 10) Overlays 11)
Autogeneous healing 12) Surface coatings Here we will discuss about most popular
repair technique of cracks such as epoxy-injection method and grouting, 1) Crack Repair
By Epoxy-injection Method Epoxy compounds are having very well compressive, tensile
and bond strength, They can be used for preparing repair mortars but if used as
bonding/binding materials for concrete i,e, epoxy concrete, cost is prohibitic, Cracks as
narrow as 0,05 mm can be bonded by injections of epoxy, It is excellent material for
repairing cracks because they have very good properties such as resistant against water
penetration, resistant to crack formation and their very good adhesive properties, This
method has been successfully used in repair of cracks in building, bridges, and other
types of concrete structures, repair process by this method is as follow; a) Clean cracks
The very first step is to clean cracks that have Contaminants such as oil, grease, dirt or
fine particles, Because such contaminants prevent epoxy penetration in cracks to be
repaired, For this reason cleaning is required, b) Sealing of surfaces Surface cracks
should be sealed, It is used to keep epoxy from leaking out before it has gelled, This can
be done by applying an epoxy, polyester or other appropriate sealing material to
surface of crack and allowing it to harden, c) Install entry and venting ports When cracks
are v-grooved, drill holes are made in groove of about 20mm diameter below apex of v-
grooved section, Fittings such as pipe nipples are inserted in to holes, But when cracks
are not v-grooved, an entry port is to be bond fitting flush with concrete face over crack,
d) Mixing of epoxy It is done either by batch or continuous methods, In batch mixing,
adhesive components are premixed according to manufacturer’s instructions, usually
with use of mechanical stirrer, like paint mixing paddle, In continuous method, two
liquid adhesive components pass through metering and driving pumps prior to passing
through an automatic mixing head, e) Inject epoxy The equipment’s used for injecting
epoxy are hydraulic pumps, air actuated caulking guns or paint pressure pots, pressure
used for injection must be selected carefully, use of excessive pressure can cause
additional damage, If crack is vertical or inclined injection process should begin by
pumping epoxy in to entry port at lowest level until epoxy level reaches entry port
above, For horizontal cracks, injection should start from one end of crack to other in
same manner, f) Remove surface seal Once injected epoxy has cured, surface seal should
be removed by draining or other means as appropriate, B, Crack Repair by Grouting
Based on grouting material used, there are three methods; 1) Portland cement Grouting
Wide cracks in gravity dams and thick concrete walls can be repaired by filling Portland
cement grout in cracks, This method is proved effective in preventing water leakage, but
will not structurally bond cracked sections, In this method very first step is cleaning
concrete along crack by using air jetting or water jetting, then grout nipples at suitable
intervals is installed, then sealing is done between seats with sealant, then crack should
be flushed to clean it and test seal and then grouting whole area, To improve properties
of grout, water reducers or admixtures may be used, 2) Chemical Grouting Chemicals
used for grouting are silicates, urethanes and acrylomides, Two or more chemicals are
combined to form gel, solid precipitate or foam as opposed to cement grouts that
consists of suspensions of solid particles in fluid, Chemical grouts can be used in moist
environments and in very fine fractures, But with some limits of control of gel time
PREVENTION OF CRACKS 1.
By creating slip joints under support of RCC slab on walls, cracks by elastic deformation
can be prevented, 2. Construct various joints such as expansion joints, construction
joints, slip joints and control joints to prevent cracks from thermal movement, 3. Slab
should be provided with thermal insulation, 4. Concrete should be of good quality, Use
richer mix of cement concrete 1;1,5;3 to prevent cracks, 5.
In mixing of cement concrete or cement mortar, Use minimum quantity of water, as per
water cement ratio, 6. Do not use excessive cement in mortar mix, Because as general
rule, richer mix is, greater shrinkage will be, And shrinkage is one of major causes of
occurrence of cracks, 7. Use largest possible aggregate and materials should be of good
grading and quality, 8.
As soon as initial setting has taken place, curing should be started and be continued for
at least seven to ten days, 9. Fine materials which contain silt, clay and dust should not
be used, coarse sand/fine aggregate used in cement concrete and cement mortar mix
should has silt and clay less than 4%, 10. Use coarse and fine aggregates after washing
to reduce silt contents, 11.
Strong bond between concrete and plaster prevents shrinkage cracks, if rendering is
done as early as possible after removal of shuttering, 12. Due to growth of roots under
foundation, cracks can occur in vicinity of wall, To prevent such cracks, do not let trees
grow too close to buildings, compound walls etc, Remove any saplings of trees as soon
as possible if they start growing in or near of walls etc, 13.
The best control measure against corrosion is use of concrete with low permeability, 14.
The structural design of foundation should be carried out in such manner as to achieve
uniform distribution of pressure on ground to avoid differential settlement, 15. Use
good quality of building materials according to specification, 16.
Epoxy injection- Cracks as narrow as 0,002 in, (0,05 mm) can be bonded by injection of
epoxy, technique generally consists of establishing entry and venting ports at close
intervals along cracks, sealing crack on exposed surfaces, and injecting epoxy under
pressure, This technique is not applicable if cracks are actively leaking and cannot be
dried out, Wet cracks can be injected using moisture tolerant materials, but
contaminants in cracks (including silt and water) can reduce effectiveness of epoxy to
structurally repair cracks, 2.
Routing and Sealing- Routing and sealing is used to treat both fine pattern cracks and
larger, isolated cracks, common and effective use is for waterproofing by sealing cracks
on concrete surface where water stands, or where hydrostatic pressure is applied, This
treatment reduces ability of moisture to reach reinforcing steel or pass through
concrete, causing surface stains or other problems, This method involves enlarging crack
along its exposed face and filling and sealing it with suitable joint sealant, sealants may
be any of several materials, including epoxies, urethanes, silicones, polysulfides,
asphaltic materials, or polymer mortars, The procedure consists of preparing groove at
surface ranging in depth, typically, from 1/4 to 1 in, (6 to 25 mm), concrete saw, hand
tools or pneumatic tools may be used, groove is then cleaned by air blasting,
sandblasting, or water blasting, and dried, sealant is placed into dry groove and allowed
to cure, bond breaker may be provided at bottom of groove to allow sealant to change
shape, without concentration of stress on bottom, 3.
Stitching- Stitching involves drilling holes on both sides of crack and grouting in U-
shaped metal units with short legs (staples or stitching dogs) that span crack, Stitching
may be used when tensile strength must be reestablished across major cracks, stitching
procedure consists of drilling holes on both sides of crack, cleaning holes, and
anchoring legs of staples in holes, with either non shrink grout or an epoxy resin-based
bonding system, 4.
Additional Reinforcement- This technique consists of sealing crack, drilling holes that
intersect crack plane at approximately 90 deg, filling hole and crack with injected epoxy
and placing reinforcing bar into drilled hole, Typically, No, 4 or 5 (10 M or 15 M) bars are
used, extending at least 18 in, (0,5 m) each side of crack, reinforcing bars can be spaced
to suit needs of repair, They can be placed in any desired pattern, depending on design
criteria and location of in-place reinforcement, 5.
Pre-stressing steel-Post-tensioning is often desirable solution when major portion of
member must be strengthened or when cracks that have formed must be closed This
technique uses pre stressing strands or bars to apply compressive force, Adequate
anchorage must be provided for pre stressing steel, and care is needed so that problem
will not merely migrate to another part of structure, 6.
Drilling and Pumping-Drilling and plugging crack consists of drilling down length of
crack and grouting it to form key, This technique is only applicable when cracks run in
reasonable straight lines and are accessible at one end, This method is most often used
to repair vertical cracks in retaining walls, hole [typically 2 to 3 in, (50 to 75 mm) in
diameter] should be drilled, centered on and following crack, 7.
Gravity Filling- Low viscosity monomers and resins can be used to seal cracks with
surface widths of 0,001 to 0,08 in, (0,03 to 2 mm) by gravity filling, High-molecular-
weight methacrylates, urethanes, and some low viscosity epoxies have been used
successfully, lower viscosity, finer cracks that can be filled, typical procedure is to clean
surface by air blasting and/or water blasting, Wet surfaces should be permitted to dry
several days to obtain best crack filling, RESULTS A, Cracks Repair in Building by
Grouting Method We used Portland cement grouting method to repair cracks in our
selected site, Injection of slurry or liquid solution into soil or rock formation is termed as
grouting, injected material is referred to as grout, Ordinary Portland Cement used in
grouting should be as per IS; 269 and sand and water should be as per IRS Concrete
Bridge Code, With approval of Divisional Engineer, admixtures can be added to impart
non-shrinkable properties and to improve flow ability of grout, water- cement ratio (by
weight) for grout should be 0,4 to 0,5, when crack width exceeds 0,5mm, lower ratio
should be used, Pressure grouting equipment is used to inject grout in cracks, We used
Air Compressor with capacity of 3 to 4 cum/per minute, grouting pressure should be 2
to 4 kg/cm2, After grouting, curing should be done for 14 days, Once grouting work is
done all grouting equipment including slurry and mixing drums, nozzles, pipes etc,
should be thoroughly washed to prevent damage of equipment, After work has been
completed, it should be inspected thoroughly by Engineer In charge and should be kept
under observation for period of 6 months or more for its behaviour after grouting,
Although it is time consuming method yet it is more used because it gives better result,
result of grouting method restores and increases strength of cracked component, A,
Rebound Hammer Test Result Average rebound number for horizontal hammer position
and corresponding compressive strength is presented in table 3, The table shows that
compressive strength of concrete increases with increasing rebound number except for
sample no, 4, For this particular sample rebound number was found to be high
comparative to its low compressive strength, This was considered an experimental error
and this sample was excluded in further calculations, In this concrete grade M-25 was
used and surface condition was dry, direction of Rebound was horizontal, Rebound
hammer is handy and portable device, operation of Rebound Hammer is simple,
Therefore it can be convenient method for field identification of concrete, This method
is widely used in estimating compressive strength of concrete, average Rebound
number and related quality of concrete is given in table below, Table 1; Average
Rebound number and compressive strength Sr,No, Average corrected Rebound value
Compressive Strength (N/mm2) Direction of Rebound Grade of concrete Quality of
concrete 1 42 44 Horizontal M-25 very good hard layer 2 40 41 Good layer 3 39 39
Good layer 4 29 22 Fair 5 38 37 Good layer 6 37 35 Good layer 7 35 32 Good layer 8 33
29 Good layer 9 32 27 Good layer 10 31 25 Good layer A, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test
Result The ultrasonic pulse velocity readings are given in table 4, At time of testing
average temperature of atmosphere was 32°, As per 13311 (part-1) ; 1992 RA 2008
clause No, 6,1, pulse velocity of saturated concrete may be up to 2% higher than that of
similar dry concrete, In general, drying concrete may result in somewhat lower pulse
velocity, At temp, Between 30-60 °C, there can be reduction of in pulse velocity up to
5%, Table 2; Readings of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test Sr,No, Grade of concrete
Distance (m) Transit Time (microsecond) Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (km/sec) Probing
Method Surface condition Quality of concrete 1 M-25 0,600 155,9 3,85 Cross Probing
Dry Good 2 0,600 104,4 5,75 Excellent 3 0,600 147,9 4,06 Good 4 0,600 144,9 4,14 Good
5 0,600 180,9 3,32 Medium 6 0,600 160,6 3,74 Good 7 0,600 141,7 4,23 Good 8 0,600
162,6 3,69 Good 9 0,600 154,9 3,87 Good 10 0,600 150,1 4,00 Good Table 3Response
Rate of Questionnaire No Respondents Questionnaire Distributed Returned
Questionnaire Unfinished Questionnaire Analyzed Questionnaire No, No, percent No,
percent No, percent 1 Client 16 13 81,25 1 6,25 12 75,00 2 Consultant 23 19 82,60 1 4,35
18 78,26 3 Contractor 42 30 71,43 5 11,90 25 59,52 4 Residents 56 41 73,21 0 0,00 41
73,21 Total 137 103 77,12 7 5,10 96 71,50 A total of 81 questionnaires were sent to
selected sample of respondents in 20/80 condominium construction which comprise
following; 16 client, 23 consultants and 42 contractors, Form those questioners 12
clients’, 18 consultants’ and 25 contractors’ questioners were analyzed, Besides, in order
to differentiate different common types of defects seen after construction 56
questionnaires were distributed to residents of 20/80 condominium who are living on
different sites under Yeka sub city, The numbers were determined on basis of available
engineers employed by contractors and consultants on sites when time available for
conducting research works, Questionnaire has been designed considering result would
be analyzed quantitatively, Consequently, responses of questionnaire survey were coded
in SPSS- 20 and Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, descriptive statistics function such as;
mean, frequency distribution, which shows frequency of observation of each response to
each variable under investigation is used to analyze result of some questions,
Computation of mean score and relative importance index is also used to analyze results
of ‘rating scale’ type of questions, Consequently spearman correlation is employed to
analyze correlation between ranking of respondents’ response, such as clients,
contractors and consultants, following findings are obtained and discussed below,
Figure,1 Classifications of Consultants Table 4 Classification of Contractors Classification
Number Percentage Cumulative Grade 3 GC 1 5 4,0 20 20 BC 4 16,0 Grade 4 GC 3 7 12,0
28 48 BC 4 16,0 Grade 5 GC 5 10 20,0 40 88 BC 5 20,0 Grade 6 GC 1 3 4,0 12 100 BC 2
8,0 Total 25 25 100,0 100 Respondent's Position in Site Table 4 illustrates that from
clients 8,33percent are office managers, 66,67percent senior officers and 25percent are
junior officers, Whereas from consultants 16,6 percent are project coordinator,
27,78percent resident engineers and 55,56percent are site engineers, Further, from
contracting companies, 52percent are site engineers and 36percent are project
managers, Most of respondents were site supervisors and site engineers, Therefore
reliability of questionnaire responses were accepted since their scope of work is in site;
and has certain experience and expertise, Table 5 Respondent’s Position in Site Client
Consultant Contractor Position No, Percent Position No, Percent Position No, Percent
Office manager 1 8,33 Project coordinator 3 16,67 Project manager 9 36 Senior officer 8
66,67 Resident engineer 5 27,78 Assistant project manager 1 4 Junior officer 3 25,00 Site
supervisor 10 55,56 Site engineer 13 52 Total 12 100 Total 18 100 Forman 2 8 Total 25
100 The respondent’s Educational level is shown in Figure 4,2 below, 25,45 percent of
respondents have M,Sc and 60 percent have B,Sc, Generally, 85,45 percent of them have
B,Sc and M,Sc, This indicates great confidence in their answers, Figure 2 Educational
Levels of Respondents Years of Experience in Construction Industry and Condominium
Construction Out of 55 respondents, data depicted below shows that 40percent of
respondents had 5 or less years of working experience in construction industry,
Whereas, in condominium construction 27,27percent and 25,45 percent of them had
from one up to three years and from three to five years of experience, This implies that
respondents have quite reasonable working experience, Table 6 Respondents Work
Experience Experience in construction industry Condominium housing construction Year
No, percent Year No, percent <1 3 5,45 <1 8 14,55 1 – 3 10 18,18 1 – 3 15 27,27 3 – 5 8
14,55 3 – 5 14 25,45 5 – 10 22 40,00 5-8 10 18,18 10-15 8 14,55 8-10 6 10,91 15 - 20 2
3,64 >10 2 3,636 > 20 2 3,64 Total 55 100 Total 55 100 Table 7 Age and House
Ownership of Respondents Age (years) Number Percentage Cumulative Number
Percentage >60 2 4,88 2 4,87 50-59 6 14,63 8 19,51 40-49 11 26,83 19 46,34 30-39 15
36,59 34 82,92 <30 7 17,07 41 100 Total 41 100 As shown Figure 4,3, regarding to
owning of housing, 63,44percent of residents are living in their own house and 36,56
percent are tenanted, This indicates answer from respondents comes from reliable
source, Table 8Length of Duration of Respondents of Residents Years Number
Percentage Cumulative Number Percentage >6 10 24,39 10 24,39 4-6 8 19,51 18 43,90
1-3 13 31,71 31 75,60 <1 10 24,39 41 100 Total 41 100 Figur Residents Educational
Levels Table 9 Response For Causes Of Uneven Wall Causes Client Consultant Contractor
Number Percentage Poor workmanship 9 14 13 36 65,5 Poor quality Material 0 0 1 1 1,8
Poor workmanship & Poor quality material 3 4 11 18 32,7 Total 12 18 25 55 100 I)
Causes for faulty door/window defects Further, faulty door/window defect is select as
third defect, As shown in Table 4,13 below, Poor workmanship and Poor quality material
together were ranked1st having 49,1 percent, Poor workmanship, Poor quality material
alone takes 2nd and 3rd ranks each 32,7 percent and 18,2 percent respectively, As
argued above implementing training and education of labors, pursue strict supervision,
generating Proper communication between parties involved, and also using of suitable
construction management can minimize workmanship problems as well as poor quality
material, Table 10 Response for Cause of Faulty Door/Window Defects Causes Client
Consultant Contractor Number Percentage(percent) Poor workmanship 2 9 7 18 32,7
Poor quality material 2 2 6 10 18,2 Poor workmanship/Poor material 8 7 12 27 49,1 Total
12 18 25 55 100 The overall causes of defect from client, consultant and contractor point
of view as shown Figure 4,17 below that client agrees that 51,33 percent of construction
defect were caused by poor workmanship, 27,75 percent because of defective material
and remaining 10,65 percent and 10,27 percent of construction defect were caused by
design problem and subsurface deficiencies respectively, And consultants agree that
53,47 percent of construction defects were caused by poor workmanship, 25,96 percent
because of defective material, whereas 11,83 percent and 8,74 percent of construction
defect were caused by design problem and subsurface deficiencies respectively, On
other hand contractors also thought that 51,27 percent of construction defects were
caused by poor workmanship, 29,71 percent because of poor quality of material and
10,51 percent and 8,51 percent of construction defect were caused by design problem
and subsurface deficiencies respectively, overall analyses show that 52,02 percent of
construction defects were caused by poor workmanship, 27,80 percent were because of
defective material and remaining 10,99 percent and 9,71 percent of construction defects
were caused by design problem and subsurface deficiencies respectively, Figure Overall
Causes of Defect from Client, Consultant & Contractor Point of View CONCLUSION This
examine offers perception to kinds of cracks, reasons of cracks and prevention of cracks,
Various strategies for remedy of cracks are mentioned on this examine, We can
summarize that aleven though it isn't possible to guarantee towards cracking but tries
may be made to decrease improvement of crack, And also, now no longer all kind of
crack calls for identical degree of attention, likely reasons of crack may be managed if
right attention is given to creation cloth and method to be used, In case of present
cracks, after element examine and evaluation of crack parameters, maximum suitable
technique of correction need to be followed for powerful and green restore of crack,
This examine offers perception to kinds of cracks, reasons of cracks and prevention of
cracks, Various strategies for remedy of cracks are mentioned on this examine, We can
summarize that aleven though it isn't possible to guarantee towards cracking but tries
may be made to decrease improvement of crack, And also, now no longer all kind of
crack calls for identical degree of attention, The likely reasons of crack may be managed
if right attention is given to creation cloth and method to be used, In case of present
cracks, after element examine and evaluation of crack parameters, maximum suitable
technique of correction need to be followed for powerful and green restore of crack,
This studies paintings concludes that aleven though it's miles not possible to assure
towards cracking but tries may be made to decrease improvement of crack, Some
prevention might be sorted for duration of development procedure itself, Any loss of
attentiveness can cause purpose for harm withinside constructing in its future, which
also can cause failure of structure, And also, now no longer all kind of crack calls for
identical degree of attention, Cracks can also additionally arise because of numerous
reasons, as mentioned earlier, incidence of cracks can't be stopped however unique
measures may be taken to limition them to lessen extent and diploma of consequences,
capability reasons of crack may be managed if right attention is given to creation cloth
and method to be used, Generally speaking, for reasons and prevention of cracks
especially case it's miles essential to make cautious observations, In case of present
cracks, after element examine and evaluation of crack parameters, maximum suitable
technique of correction need to be followed for powerful and green restore of crack,
REFERENCES 1) Rajveer Singh Narwaria, Archana Tiwari, “Development of cracks in
concrete, preventive measures and treatment methods; review”, 2) International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Vloume; 03 Issue;09,
pp,671,677,677, sep ,2016 3) Rishabh Pathak, Deepak Rastogi, “Case Study on Cracks in
public Buildings and their Remedies”, International Journal of Science and Research
(USR), Volume 6 Issue 5, pp,325-329, May 2017 4) Prasad S, Barve, Dr, Lalit S, Thakur,
Ruchi P, Barve,Jaimin K, Shah, Neha P,Patel,”DETECTION AND SIZING STUDY OF CRACKS
; CASE STUDY” ,International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering, Science &
Technology (1JAREST), Volume 2, Issue 8,pp,84-91,August-2015 5) GRISHMA THAGUNA,
“Bulding cracks-causes and remedies” , International Journal of Advanced Stuctures and
Geotechnical Engineering ISSN 2319-5347, Vol,04,No,01,pp,16-20 January 2015 6) SP
25-1984; “Handbook on Ceuses and Prevention of Cracks in Building’, 7) IS 456-2000;
“Indian Standard PLAN AND REINFORCED CONC RETE-CODE OF PRACTICE”,
INTERNET SOURCES:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0% - Empty
0% - https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/lu
0% - https://easychair.org/publications/prepr
0% - https://www.academia.edu/74196170/Percep
0% - https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/e
0% - https://cpwd.gov.in/Publication/GCC_Main
0% - http://www.adityatekkali.edu.in/blog/wp-
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/DanishAnwar25
0% - http://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/29992/3/3_da
0% - https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/files/
0% - https://aircconline.com/vlsics/V10N4/104
0% - https://lastmomenttuitions.com/mcqs/extc
0% - https://www.academia.edu/es/17778843/Des
0% - http://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCECS20
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/AravindSamala
0% - https://www.academia.edu/33239789/PLASTI
0% - https://subtitlestotranscript.wordpress.
0% - https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/1
0% - https://www.academia.edu/42021671/NMIMS_
0% - https://www.ispatguru.com/metallurgical-
0% - https://docu.tips/documents/internationa
0% - https://www.academia.edu/9710175/INDEX_A
0% - https://www.academia.edu/74191183/Causes
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/Saqibsona/bui
0% - https://civilpanel.com/types-and-causes-
0% - https://www.academia.edu/36313646/Aircra
0% - https://www.academia.edu/34085719/Identi
0% - https://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/201210
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.academia.edu/5456530/Steel_s
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.coursehero.com/file/pfj1vpc/
0% - https://archive.org/stream/Dictionary_of
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.thestructuralworld.com/2018/
0% - https://cimflok.com/how-to-properly-comp
0% - https://extension.psu.edu/agricultural-a
0% - https://www.academia.edu/74865464/Procee
0% - https://www.academia.edu/34894173/Reinfo
0% - https://www.scribd.com/presentation/4089
0% - https://rccwaterproofing.com/service/wat
0% - https://1library.net/document/qo71j1mz-c
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/MOHAMMEDSABBA
0% - https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/11/378
0% - https://docer.tips/blacksmith-chemical-m
0% - https://nezamsanat.blogspot.com/2009/08/
0% - https://issuu.com/easywebtool/docs/preci
0% - https://www.academia.edu/13821574/Soil_e
0% - https://silo.pub/understanding-housing-d
0% - https://www.academia.edu/34085719/Identi
0% - https://1library.net/document/qo71j1mz-c
0% - https://www.scribd.com/document/41076565
0% - https://epdf.pub/creativity-theories-and
0% - https://simplyeducate.me/2015/01/05/conc
0% - https://theconstructor.org/concrete/conc
0% - https://www.forconstructionpros.com/conc
0% - https://issuu.com/derekwillstar/docs/vik
0% - https://www.academia.edu/4837077/BBSS_Ma
0% - https://www.healthpages.org/health-a-z/p
0% - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permacultu
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://periwinklewellness.wordpress.com
0% - https://ebin.pub/geotechnical-engineerin
0% - https://brainly.com/
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.teachmint.com/tfile/studymat
0% - https://drrajivdesaimd.com/2020/02/18/cy
0% - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article
0% - https://www.academia.edu/39955059/CONCRE
0% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - https://www.nakshewala.com/
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.mayoclinic.org/first-aid/fir
0% - https://www.academia.edu/33638791/DESIGN
0% - https://www.academia.edu/39634080/1_Chap
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.academia.edu/37422646/Testos
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://drrajivdesaimd.com/2014/08/31/ge
0% - https://inspectapedia.com/structure/Bric
0% - https://amtrichunuan.wordpress.com/2016/
0% - https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/
0% - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.
0% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - http://www.iosrjen.org/Papers/vol3_issue
0% - http://docshare.tips/construction-dictio
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://lodha-palavas.com/author/admin/
0% - https://archive.org/stream/NEW_1/NEW.txt
0% - https://silo.pub/understanding-housing-d
0% - https://www.healthline.com/health/mold-i
0% - https://silo.pub/1987-margaret-atwood-th
0% - https://www.scribd.com/document/33667372
0% - https://www.scribd.com/document/13990022
0% - https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~mitra/csSprin
0% - https://www.scribd.com/document/46300211
0% - http://mobiletomado.com/
0% - https://www.myassignmenthelp.net/sample-
0% - https://www.academia.edu/5919054/Getting
0% - https://docshare.tips/civil-engineering-
0% - https://iloencyclopaedia.org/part-viii?s
0% - https://www.oklaunch.com/virtual-assista
0% - https://www.findcareerpath.com/contribut
0% - https://www.tendringdc.gov.uk/sites/defa
0% - https://docshare.tips/repair-and-rehabil
0% - https://dokumen.pub/deterioration-mainte
0% - https://constructionworksblog.wordpress.
0% - https://www.forbes.com/sites/vickyvalet/
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.academia.edu/39204642/INSTIT
0% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - https://www.academia.edu/78765937/224R_0
0% - https://constructionworksblog.wordpress.
0% - http://aspirebridge.com/magazine/2012Win
0% - http://aspirebridge.com/magazine/2012Win
0% - https://www.academia.edu/es/12093141/Adv
0% - https://www.irjet.net/archives/V3/i9/IRJ
0% - https://docshare.tips/mechanical-enginee
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/SoumyaKhandel
0% - https://www.pumpsandsystems.com/basics-p
0% - https://www.thermal-engineering.org/what
0% - https://quizlet.com/379151067/boilers-cg
0% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - https://www.academia.edu/28092267/EGYPTI
0% - https://aggf.unibl.org/uploads/attachmen
0% - https://www.academia.edu/22238636/Causes
0% - https://www.creativemechanisms.com/blog/
0% - https://theconstructor.org/concrete/conc
0% - https://www.academia.edu/28671051/Repair
0% - https://www.cement.org/cement-concrete/c
0% - https://kennybeal.wordpress.com/2012/01/
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.academia.edu/2228408/Agricul
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.phivolcs.dost.gov.ph/index.p
0% - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.100
0% - https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/10/17/i
1% - https://www.academia.edu/16427673/CAUSES
0% - https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/build
0% - https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v6i5/ART201
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://mukmahas.blogspot.com/
0% - https://www.coursehero.com/file/62558671
1% - https://www.academia.edu/16427673/CAUSES
1% - https://www.academia.edu/16427673/CAUSES
0% - https://www.academia.edu/6755124/REPAIR_
0% - https://docshare.tips/chemistry_588935db
0% - https://www.coursehero.com/file/62558671
0% - https://www.cmu.edu/cee/projects/PMbook/
0% - https://theconstructor.org/practical-gui
0% - https://theconstructor.org/concrete/type
1% - https://www.academia.edu/16427673/CAUSES
0% - https://www.quora.com/Why-do-we-see-crac
0% - https://www.coursehero.com/file/62558671
0% - https://www.academia.edu/38589908/Types_
0% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
1% - https://www.academia.edu/16427673/CAUSES
0% - https://www.nairaland.com/2114041/segzy1
1% - https://www.academia.edu/16427673/CAUSES
0% - https://www.nairaland.com/2114041/segzy1
0% - https://www.cement.org/learn/concrete-te
1% - https://www.academia.edu/16427673/CAUSES
0% - https://www.cement.org/docs/default-sour
0% - https://www.nairaland.com/2114041/segzy1
0% - https://www.nairaland.com/2114041/segzy1
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/AravindSamala
0% - https://www.concreteconstruction.net/how
0% - https://qaqcconstruction.com/2018/05/08/
0% - https://issuu.com/www.ijera.com/docs/s50
0% - https://issuu.com/www.ijera.com/docs/s50
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://issuu.com/www.ijera.com/docs/s50
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
1% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - https://www.constrofacilitator.com/reaso
0% - https://www.coursehero.com/file/p1s1lkp/
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/NayanaD123/cr
1% - https://grdjournals.com/uploads/article/
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.bulwarkconchem.com/concrete-
1% - https://www.slideshare.net/GRDJournals1/
0% - https://www.speedo.de/7qSt_method-statem
1% - https://grdjournals.com/uploads/article/
0% - https://mccoymart.com/post/methods-to-re
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/ankit_1610/ch
1% - https://grdjournals.com/uploads/article/
0% - https://www.academia.edu/31705645/Method
1% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
1% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - https://theconstructor.org/concrete/meth
0% - https://www.academia.edu/4145226/8th_sem
0% - http://www.drywallceilingrepairs.com/Ima
1% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - https://www.academia.edu/22238636/Causes
1% - https://grdjournals.com/uploads/article/
1% - https://grdjournals.com/uploads/article/
0% - https://karesto24.de/de/nici-qid---21342
0% - https://www.coursehero.com/file/p1s1lkp/
1% - https://www.slideshare.net/GRDJournals1/
0% - https://www.irjet.net/archives/V3/i9/IRJ
0% - https://www.pavingexpert.com/concjnt1
1% - https://grdjournals.com/uploads/article/
0% - https://engineeringcivil.org/articles/bu
1% - https://www.academia.edu/16427673/CAUSES
1% - https://www.slideshare.net/GRDJournals1/
1% - https://www.academia.edu/36143555/Method
0% - https://civiljungle.com/difference-betwe
0% - https://civilblog.org/2019/02/15/how-agg
0% - https://www.academia.edu/15980572/PLASTE
0% - https://www.gharexpert.com/home/how_to_p
1% - https://www.academia.edu/16427673/CAUSES
0% - https://theconstructor.org/concrete/corr
0% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/eng
0% - https://theconstructor.org/building/type
0% - https://www.dgfscdhg.gov.in/national-bui
0% - https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Doc
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
1% - https://www.academia.edu/36143555/Method
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/rajeshgoswami
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.fprimec.com/on-site-evaluati
0% - https://www.sefindia.org/forum/files/non
1% - https://www.academia.edu/36143555/Method
0% - https://civilengineeringt.blogspot.com/
1% - https://www.academia.edu/36143555/Method
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/orpnet/tr
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://researchgate.net/figure/Ultrason
0% - https://instrumentationtools.com/flow-tr
0% - https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hr
1% - https://www.slideshare.net/GRDJournals1/
0% - https://patents.google.com/patent/US2439
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/ankit_1610/ch
1% - https://www.academia.edu/36143555/Method
0% - https://kashanu.ac.ir/Files/The%20Ultras
1% - https://www.academia.edu/36143555/Method
0% - https://www.academia.edu/40162215/Advanc
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/gauravhtandon
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/ankit_1610/ch
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/SoumyaKhandel
0% - https://www.academia.edu/31705645/Method
0% - https://premiumtechnical.com/using-epoxy
0% - https://anyflip.com/mshuq/azbu/basic/251
0% - https://www.civilengineeringforum.me/met
0% - https://seismic40.blogspot.com/2013/08/m
1% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - https://www.academia.edu/31705645/Method
0% - https://dailycivil.com/methods-of-repair
1% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=stit
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/AravindSamala
0% - https://www.academia.edu/74191183/Causes
1% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - https://seismic40.blogspot.com/2013/08/m
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/Arvchiru/litt
0% - https://www.academia.edu/25252607/A_REPO
0% - https://www.academia.edu/34646887/Buildi
0% - https://theconstructor.org/concrete/meth
0% - https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/manufa
0% - https://www.academia.edu/12308756/Study_
0% - https://theconstructor.org/concrete/meth
0% - http://www.rdso.indianrailways.gov.in/up
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.academia.edu/15092867/CAUSES
0% - https://theconstructor.org/concrete/meth
1% - https://www.academia.edu/36143555/Method
0% - https://www.cmu.edu/cee/projects/PMbook/
0% - https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/3201/
1% - https://www.academia.edu/36143555/Method
0% - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar
0% - https://www.ijert.org/experimental-study
0% - https://www.slideshare.net/anshulshakya1
0% - https://civiljungle.com/non-destructive-
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/topic/Ultra
0% - https://www.hindawi.com/journals/amse/20
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Resu
1% - https://www.slideshare.net/GRDJournals1/
1% - https://www.slideshare.net/GRDJournals1/
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat500/less
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dav
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://issuu.com/masoncj/docs/ge_2
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.academia.edu/23432875/Bridge
0% - https://www.academia.edu/3382693/Constru
0% - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK52
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://vdoc.pub/documents/exploring-wri
0% - https://www.termpaperwarehouse.com/essay
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - https://www.elsabagh7.com/2021/08/motorc
0% - https://www.coursehero.com/file/14878336
0% - https://www.scribd.com/document/43638000
0% - https://www.researchgate.net/publication
0% - http://ijasret.com/
0% - https://www.scribd.com/document/36912949
0% - https://www.scribd.com/document/43638000