Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 30

DO ORTHOTICS

WORK
{ THEORY AND RESEARCH EVIDENCE FOR
THEIR BIOMECHAICAL EFFECTS
BIOMECHANICS:

- The science that examines the forces acting


upon and within a biological structure and
effects produced by such a force
- Niggs BM 1994
MECHANICS:

- A branch of phyics that concerned


with motion and defomities of bodies
that are acted on by mechanical
disturbances call forces
WHAT IS A FOOT ORTHOTIC??
-a foot orthosis is an in-shoe medical device which is
designed to alter the magnitudes and temporal
patterns of reaction forces acting on the plantar
aspect of the foot in order to allow more normal foot
and lower extremity function and to decrease
pathologic loading forces on the structural
components of the foot and lower extremity during
weightbearing activities

K. Kirby 2002
GOALS OF FOOT ORTHOSIS THERAPY

-the goal of foot orthosis therapy should be


to reduce the patholgic loading forces on
the injured structural components of the
body in order to allow healing of the
injured structures to prevent new injuries
from occurring and to promote more
efficient dynamics of the body during
weight bearing activities

K. Kirby 2002
PODIATRIC BIOMECHAICS HAD ASSUMED
THAT STRUCTURE CAN PREDICT
FUNCTION
Eight biophysical criteria for “normalcy”
proposed by Root, et al in 1971 Root ML, Orien WP,
Weed JH, Hughes RJ: Biomechanical Examination of the
Foot, Volume 1. Clinical Biomechanics Corporation, Los
Angeles, 1971.

Root, et al proposed that all feet and lower


extremities which did not meet the criteria for
“normal” were considered to possess structural
defects and were, therefore, considered to be
“abnormal”
ROOT’S DEFOMITIES BASED ON STJ
NEUTRAL

Root classified “foot types” using frontal


plane positions of rearfoot to tibia, forefoot to
rearfoot, and first ray position relative to 1st -
5th metatarsal heads
No scientific studies have shown any
correlation between Root et al measurements
and foot and lower extremity function and/or
injuries
TISSUE STRESS MODEL
Tissue stress model first proposed as a model for
mechanical foot therapy in 1995
by McPoil and Hunt McPoil TG, Hunt GC: Evaluation
and management of foot and ankle disorders: Present
problems and future directions. JOSPT, 21:381-388, 1995.

Tissue stress model is not a novel idea since it is


based on same ideas are already in current use in
treatment of
parts of body other than foot and lower extremity

Tissue stress model doesn’t rely on “unreliable


measurement techniques”
TISSUE STRESS APPROACH TO THERAPY

Orthosis goals are best achieved by specifically


designing custom foot orthosis to reduce magnitude
of stress on injured structural components and to
also optimize function of foot and lower extremity
for specific weightbearing activity

It is very important that while designing foot


orthosis to reduce tissue stress and to optimize
function, that no other injuries or pathologies result
from orthosis therapy
USING TISSUE STRESS APPROACH TO TREAT
LOWER EXTREMITY PATHOOGY
1. Specifically identify anatomical structures which
are source of patient’s complaints

2. Determine structural and/or functional variables


which may be source of pathological forces on
injured structure

3. Design orthosis/shoe treatment plan which will


most effectively reduce pathological forces on
injured structural components, will optimize gait
function and will not cause other pathology or
symptoms
STEPS IN TISSUE STRESS APPROACH
57 y/o white female with right medial
foot/ankle pain and swelling, R > L flatfoot
deformity and difficulty walking due to
right foot and ankle pain:

Identify injured structures


Determine structural & functional
variables
Design Tx Plan to reduce stress on injury
HOW DO FOOT ORTHOSES WORK?
Are the actions of orthoses on foot and
lower extremity purely mechanical in
nature?

Do orthoses work by modifying


proprioceptive response of foot to ground
reaction force?
What is best current theory that explains
how foot orthoses work from a mechanical
aspect?
HOW DOES AN ORTHOSIS CONTROL STJ
PRONATIONA ND SUPINATION

If orthosis is designed to “control STJ


pronation”, ORF will be shifted more
medially so STJ supination moment is
increased

If orthosis is designed to “control STJ


supination”, then ORF will be shifted
more laterally so STJ pronation moment is
increased
ORF= Orthosis reaction force
MECHANICAL EFFECT OF ORTHOSES
ON STJ

Standard foot orthosis shifts more laterally located GRF


to more medially located ORF, especially in midfoot
Redmond A, Lumb PS, Landorf K:, 2000.

Standard foot orthoses decrease external STJ pronation


moment and increase external STJ supination moment
due to orthosis contact with MLA of foot

Orthosis acts to alter location, magnitude and temporal


patterns of GRF which, in turn, alters rotational effects
of GRF on STJ and MTJ/midfoot joints during gait
Kirby, Green 1992
As STJ axis becomes more medially
deviated, orthosis has decreased surface
area medial to STJ axis to generate STJ
supination moments

STJ axis medial deviation decreases


mechanical efficiency of orthosis at causing
supination
MECHANICAL EFFECTS OF MEDIAL
HEEL SKIVE
Medial heel skive increases STJ
supination moment by shifting ORF
to more medial location on rearfoot

Kirby KA: The medial heel skive


technique: improving pronation control
in foot orthoses. JAPMA, 82: 177-188,
1992
THERAPEUTIC ACTIONS OF FOOT
ORTHOSES
Reduce plantar pressures in symptomatic areas
of plantar foot
Reduce pathologic moments acting across joint
axes of foot and lower extremity
Reduce pathologic internal loading forces on
specific structural components of foot and lower
extremity
Improve balance and stability of body over foot
during weightbearing activities
Optimize function during weightbearing
activities
Foot orthoses may be designed to
specifically reduce force at areas of plantar
foot where excessive plantar pressure is
causing pathology and/or symptoms so that
disability is lessened and gait function is
improved
THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF FOOT
ORTHOSES
In study of 81 patients, 91% were “satisfied with orthoses” and
52% “wouldn’t leave home without them”
Donnatelli R, Hurlbert C, et al: Biomechanical foot orthotics: A retrospective study. J
Ortho Sp Phys Ther, 10:205-212, 1988.

76% of 500 distance runners reported complete resolution or


great improvement of symptoms
Gross ML, Davlin LB, Evanski PM: Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the long
distance runner. Am. J. Sports Med., 19:409-412, 1991.

102 athletic patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome,


76.5% of patients improved and 2% were asymptomatic after 2-
4 weeks of orthosis therapy
Saxena A, Haddad J: The effect of foot orthoses on patellofemoral pain
70% of 180 patients “definitely helped” by orthoses
Blake RL, Denton JA: Functional foot orthoses for athletic injuries: A retrospective study. J. Am.
Pod. Med. Assoc., 75:359-362, 1985.

83% of 520 patients were satisfied and 95% reported their


problem had partially or completely resolved with orthoses
Moraros J, Hodge W: Orthotic survey: Preliminary results. JAPMA, 83:139-148, 1993.

75% reduction in disability rating and 66% reduction in pain


rating with foot orthoses occurred in 15 patients with plantar
fasciitis
Gross MT et al: The impact of custom semi-rigid foot orthotics on pain and disability for
individuals with plantar fasciitis. J Ortho Sp Phys Ther, 32:149-157, 2002.

In study of 275 patients that wore orthoses for over a year, the
majority of subjects obtained between 60-100% relief of
symptoms, only 9% reporting no relief
of symptoms
Walter JH, Ng G, Stoitz JJ: A patient satisfaction survey on prescription custom-molded foot
orthoses. JAPMA, 94:363-367, 2004.
CUSTOM FOOT ORTHOSES ARE EFFECTIVE AT
TREATING ATHLETIC INJURIES

Success rate with custom foot orthoses in


treatment of running injuries is 50 - 90%

Eggold JF: Orthotics in the prevention of runner’s overuse injuries. Phys. Sports Med.,
9:181-185, 1981.
D’Ambrosia RD: Orthotic devices in running injuries. Clin. Sports Med., 4:611-618,
1985.
Dugan RC, D’Ambrosia RD: The effect of orthotics on the treatment of selected running
injuries. Foot Ankle, 6:313,
1986.
Kilmartin TE, Wallace WA: The scientific basis for the use of biomechanical foot
orthoses in the treatment of lower limb
sports injuries-a review of the literature. Br. J. Sports Med.,
28:180-184, 199
POSTIVE PHYSICAL AND MENTAL THERAPEUTIC
EFFECTS

In prospective study of 79 women over age of 65, subjects that received


custom foot orthoses and guidance on shoe fitting had significant
improvements in mental health, bodily pain and general health
compared to non-orthosis control group

Researchers determined that foot orthosis intervention was “markedly


effective not only in physical but also in mental aspect”
Kusumoto A, Suzuki T, Yoshida H, Kwon J: Intervention study to
improve quality of life and health problems of community-living elderly
women in Japan by shoe fitting and custom-made insoles. Gerontology,
53:348-356, 200
RESEARCH EVIDENCE ORTHOSES ARE EFECTIVE
IN TREATING CERTAIN PATHOLOGIES

Reduce pain and disability in RA and JRA


Reduce pain and disability in knee OA
Reduces pain and disability from ankle bleeds in
hemophilia A
Patellofemoral pain syndrome
Plantar fasciitis
Reduce plantar pressures in neuropathic diabetic feet
Relieve plantar pressure and pain from metatarsalgia
Prevents stress fractures in metatarsals and femur
REDUCTION OF PLANTAR PRESSURE IN PES CAVUS
REDUCES PAIN

42 subjects with metatarsalgia, orthoses decreased


metatarsal head pain, force impulse and peak pressure
at met heads
Postema K, Burm PE, Zande ME, Limbeek J: Primary metatarsalgia:
the influence of a custom moulded insole and a rockerbar on plantar
pressure. Pros Orth Int, 22:35-44, 1998.
Prospective study of 151 subjects with cavus, wore
custom orthoses, after 3 months showed significant
decreases in foot pain, increases in quality of life and 3
times more
forefoot plantar pressure reduction when compared to
sham insoles
Burns J, Crosbie J, Ouvrier R, Hunt A: Effective orthotic therapy for
the painful cavus foot. JAPMA, 96:205-211, 2006
ORTHOSES REDUCE PLANTAR PRESSURE

Custom orthoses most effective at reducing pain and all orthoses


significantly reduced pressure under 1st and 2nd metatarsal heads
in 12 RA subjects
Hodge MC, Bach TM, Carter GM: Orthotic management of plantar
pressure ad pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biom, 14:567-575, 1999.
Both normal and RA subjects showed significant reductions in
plantar pressures and loading forces during stance phase of gait
Li CY, et al: Biomechanical evaluation of foot pressure and
loading force during gait in RA patients with and without foot
orthoses. Kurume Med J, 47:211-217, 2000.
Reduce sub-hallux pressure during gait
Scherer PR, Sanders J, Eldredge DE, Duffy SJ, Lee RY: Effect of
functional foot orthoses on first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion in
stance and gait. JAPMA, 96:474-281, 2006.
ORTHOSES REDUCE PRESSURE AND HEAL DIABETIC
ULCERS
Orthoses caused 30% reduction in maximum peak pressure in 81
Type II diabetic patients
Lobmann R, et al: Effects of preventative footwear on foot pressure as determined by
pedobarography in diabetic patients: a prospective study. Diabet Med, 18:314-319,
2001.

Peak pressure and pressure-time integral reduced in 34


adolescent Type I diabetic patients
Duffin AC, Kidd R, Chan A, Donaghue KC: High plantar pressure and callus in
diabetic adolescents. Incidence and treatment. JAPMA, 93:214-220, 2003.

In 8 patients with plantar neuropathic ulcers that healed with


custom orthoses, orthoses significantly reduced peak vertical
pressure, reduced pressure/time integral and increased contact
area versus the no-insole condition
Raspovic A, et al: Effect of customized insoles on vertical plantar pressures in sites of
previous neuropathic ulceration in the diabetic foot. Foot, 10:133-138, 2000.
ORTHOSES IMPROVE BALANCE
Orthoses significantly reduced postural sway in medial/lateral
and inv/ev platform movements
Guskiewicz KM, Perrin DH: Effects of orthotics on postural sway following
inversion ankle sprain. J Orthop Sp Phys Ther, 23:326-331, 1996.

Decreased frontal plane CoP length and velocity with medially


posted orthoses when subjects stood on orthoses in single leg
stance
Hertel J, Denegar CR, et al: Effect of rearfoot orthotics on postural control in healthy
subjects. J Sport Rehabil, 10:36-47, 2001.

Orthoses improve balance in pronated feet via reductions in


medial-lateral sway during bipedal standing
Rome K, Brown CL: Randomized clinical trial into the impact of orthoses on balance
parameters in excessively pronated feet. Clin Rehab, 18:624-630, 2004.
Orthoses alter location, magnitudes, and temporal
patterns of GRF on plantar foot:

Alter both kinematics and kinetics foot and lower


extremity joints
Alter external and internal loading forces on structural
components of foot and lower extremity
Improve balance, allow improved gait function and
reduce pathologic loading forces
Allow more rapid healing of injured structures of foot
and lower extremity and assist in prevention of new
injuries
Foot orthoses have been used for well over a century by clinicians
as a means to reduce pain, improve gait mechanics, and heal
injury to the foot, lower extremity, and lower back.

There is considerable research evidence that supports the


therapeutic efficacy and significant mechanical effects of foot
orthoses on standing, walking, and running activities.

Theoretical explanations as to how foot orthoses actually produce


their therapeutic and mechanical effects have been previously
proposed and are being continually refined as exciting new
research evidence is brought to light and discussed in academic
forums.
There is great promise for increased understanding and further
development of foot orthoses as a valuable therapeutic tool in the
treatment of mechanically based musculoskeletal injuries for the
athletic and non-athletic population of today and for future
generations
Thank you

You might also like