GAC Project No.

0602110

Geotechnical Site Assessment

Proposed
Transfer Station Building
3000 S West Highway 100
Washington, IN

Prepared for:

Universal Waste Services

P.O. Box 2000
Pittsburg, PZ 47000

Prepared by:
Grade A Consultants
87 Garden Street
Port Albany, MI 23000

1/13/2006
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Scope of Services ...................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Authorization ............................................................................................................................. 1
1.4 Standard of Care ........................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 2
2.1 Proposed Development.............................................................................................................. 2
2.2 Site Description ......................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 INVESTIGATION AND TESTING ................................................................................................ 3
3.1 Subsurface Investigation ........................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Laboratory Testing .................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... 5
4.1 Stratigraphy ............................................................................................................................... 5
4.2 Groundwater .............................................................................................................................. 5
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................. 5
5.1 Site Preparation ......................................................................................................................... 6
5.2 Excavations................................................................................................................................ 6
5.3 Structural Fill............................................................................................................................. 7
5.4 Foundation Design..................................................................................................................... 8
5.5 Floor Slab Subgrade Preparation............................................................................................... 9
5.6 Floor Slab Design .................................................................................................................... 10
5.7 Pavement Subgrade Preparation..............................................................................................10
5.8 Pavement Design ..................................................................................................................... 11
5.9 Drainage and Groundwater Considerations.............................................................................13
6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ........................................................................................................... 13
7.0 CLOSURE ...................................................................................................................................... 14

APPENDICES
Appendix A Limitations
Appendix B Drawings
Appendix C Borehole Logs
Appendix D Laboratory Results
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

This report presents the results of a Geotechnical Site Assessment prepared by Grade A Consultants (GAC) for
the proposed Transfer Station Building, 3000 S West Highway 100, Washington, IN. The purpose of the
assessment was to provide recommendations for the design of foundations and other geotechnical aspects of the
proposed construction.

1.2 Scope of Services

The scope of work included the following:

• Review of available data pertinent to the site.
• Conduct a subsurface investigation.
• Conduct basic laboratory testing of select soils.
• Perform a geotechnical engineering analysis regarding the proposed construction, using the information
obtained from the subsurface investigation and laboratory testing.
• Prepare this report of our findings, conclusions, and tentative recommendations for the geotechnical
engineering aspects of the proposed construction.

1.3 Authorization

This assessment was performed and the report prepared in general accordance with our proposal. GAC received
authorization from Universal Waste Services to proceed with the work.

1.4 Standard of Care

The services performed by GAC were conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily
exercised by members of the geotechnical profession practicing contemporaneously under similar conditions in
the locality of the project. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

Limitations of this report are discussed in Appendix A. These limitations further explain the realities of
geotechnical engineering and the limitations that exist in evaluating geotechnical issues.

1
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Universal Waste Services, with specific application to the
proposed project.

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Proposed Development

It is understood that the proposed development will consist of a transfer station of approximately 11,000 square
feet and a maintenance building of approximately 6,500 square feet as shown on the Site Plan in Appendix B.

If the locations of the assumed loadings, proposed structures, floor elevations, or any other site features change
from what is shown on the site plan included in this report, GAC should be notified so that the changes can be
reviewed to determine if the recommendations presented in this report are still applicable.

2.2 Site Description

The site is located at north side of highway 100, east of junction 53. A site plan is enclosed in Appendix B. The
site is located in a industrial zoned area and is currently developed as parking lot.

The subject parcel is approximately 5.2 ± acre industrial property.

The general topography of the site is relatively flat.

Drainage across the site is directed to the highway at a slight to moderate fall as sheet flow.

2
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

3.0 INVESTIGATION AND TESTING

3.1 Subsurface Investigation

The field investigation to determine the engineering characteristics of the subsurface materials included a
reconnaissance of the project site, drilling of borings, performing standard penetration tests and obtaining disturbed
split-barrel samples, and auger samples

The drilling consisted of 9 test borings at the locations depicted on the Site Plan (Appendix B). The drilling was
carried out on 2/16/2006 using a drilling rig equipped with a rotary head contracted from Plan B Drilling.

Borings B1, B2, B3 and B4 were drilled within the proposed transfer building footprint. Borings B5, B6, B8, and
B9 were drilled within the footprint of the proposed maintenance building. And boring B7 was drilled at the
location of the future truck loading pit.

Soil samples were obtained at selected intervals in the soil test borings. Undisturbed soil samples were obtained
in general accordance with ASTM D-1587 (Thin-Walled Tube Sampling of Soils) using a standard split-spoon
sampler. A split-spoon sampler is a 2-inch O.D. tube that is driven into the soil to be sampled that can be split
open lengthwise for easy removal and visual inspection of the soil obtained. Disturbed soil samples were
obtained in general accordance with ASTM D-1586 (Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils). All
samples were identified according to project number, boring number and depth, encased in polyethylene plastic
wrapping to protect against moisture loss, and transported to our laboratory in special containers.

During the sampling procedures, standard penetration tests were performed in the borings in conjunction with the
split-barrel sampling. The standard penetration value (N) is defined as the number of blows of a 140-pound
hammer, falling thirty inches, required to advance the split-spoon sampler one-foot into the soil (ASTM D-1585).
The sampler is lowered to the bottom of the drill hole and the number of blows recorded for each of the three
successive increments of six inches penetration. The "N" value is obtained by adding the second and third
incremental numbers. The results of the standard penetration test indicate the relative density and comparative
consistency of the soils, and thereby provide a basis for estimating the relative strength and compressibility of the
soil profile components.

3
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building
Water level observations were made during the boring operations and the results are noted on the boring logs. In
relatively pervious soils, such as sandy soils, the indicated elevations are considered reliable ground water levels.
In relatively impervious soils, the accurate determination of the ground water elevation may not be possible even
after several days of observation. Seasonal variations, temperature and recent rainfall conditions may influence
the levels of the ground water table and volumes of water will depend on the permeability of the soils.

A field log was prepared for each boring. Each log-contained information concerning the boring method,
samples attempted and recovered, indications of the presence of various materials such as silt, clay, gravel or
sand and observations of ground water. It also contained an interpretation of subsurface conditions between
samples. Therefore, these logs included both factual and interpretive information. The boring logs are included
in Appendix C.

On completion of each borehole, the hole was filled in with sand and gravel and finally they were all sealed with
cement and asphalt material to restore the pavement into its previous condition.

3.2 Laboratory Testing

Laboratory tests were carried out in a number of selected soil samples in order to acquire necessary information
with regards to the physical and mechanical properties of the soil layers and further on to evaluate and determine
the parameters required for the calculations. All phases of the laboratory-testing program were performed in general
accordance with the applicable ASTM Specifications.

The following test were conducted on the selected soil samples:

• 3 Moisture Tests
• 4 Density Tests

A summary of the laboratory test results is presented in Appendix D. The samples collected will be stored for 30
days from the date of issue of this report, and then disposed of unless otherwise instructed in writing by the
client.

4
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

4.1 Stratigraphy

The following soil types were encountered in the soil test borings performed at the site:

The northeastern portion of the site was covered by 5 to 6 inches of pavement underlain by 2 to 3 feet of granular
base.

A 6 to 10 foot thick deposit of moist hard silty clay with sand was present at the surface, underlain by 10 to 12
feet of glacial till. The glacial till was mainly moist hard to very hard silty clay with some sand and gravel.

Detailed description of the type of soil layers encountered during drilling is given in the borehole logs (Appendix
B). The lines designating the interface between soil strata on the boring logs represent approximate boundaries,
transition between materials may be gradual.

4.2 Groundwater

Groundwater was encountered in boring B5 at approximately 12 feet below ground surface.

Groundwater levels may fluctuate with seasonal climatic variations and changes in the land use. Low permeability
soils will require several days or longer for groundwater to enter and stabilize in the test borings.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations presented in the following sections of this report are based on the information available
regarding the proposed construction, the results obtained from our soil test borings and laboratory tests, and our
experience with similar projects. Because the test borings represent a very small statistical sampling of
subsurface conditions, it is possible that conditions may be encountered during construction that are substantially
different from those indicated by the soil test borings. In these instances adjustments to design and construction
may be necessary.

5
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

This geotechnical report is based on the Site Plan and project information developed by GAC and the
assumptions stated in this report. Changes in the proposed location or design of the structures can have
significant effects on the conclusions and recommendations of the geotechnical report. GAC should be
contacted in the event of such changes.

5.1 Site Preparation

Concrete pavement, building rubble, concrete foundations and any other debris noted at or below the existing
ground surface should be removed as part of the site preparation for the proposed construction area. In all new
fill and excavation areas, vegetation, topsoil, roots and other deleterious materials (typically 4 to 6 inches),
deemed unsuitable shall be removed from the proposed construction areas, and replaced with controlled fill. Site
clearing, grubbing and stripping will need to be performed only during dry weather conditions. Operation of
heavy equipment on the site during wet conditions could result in excessive rutting and mixing of organic debris
with the underlying soils.

5.2 Excavations

Temporary construction slopes should be designed and excavated in strict compliance with the rules and
regulations of the Federal Register, Volume 54, No. 209 (October 1989), the United States Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 29 CFR, Part 1926. This document was prepared to
better insure the safety of workers entering trenches or excavations, and requires that all excavations conform to
the new OSHA guidelines.

The contractor is solely responsible for protecting excavations by shoring, sloping, benching or other means as
required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. GAC does not assume any responsibility
for construction site safety or the activities of the contractor.

6
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

5.3 Structural Fill

It is recommended that structural fills be constructed as controlled, well-compacted engineered fills. Structural
engineered fill should be inorganic, low plastic clay, sand, or gravel. Any existing soils with a high organic
content (browns) are suitable for reuse as fill in landscaping areas only. It is recommended that only granular fill
be used within the building footprint and within 5 feet of the building footprint. The intent of these
recommendations is to reduce the potential for consolidation and settlement of new fills.

Laboratory testing should be performed on the fill materials to determine the appropriate moisture-density
relationship of the fill being placed. Adjustments to the soil moisture by wetting or drying should be made as
needed during fill placement.

During grading operations, representative samples of the proposed imported structural fill materials should be
periodically checked via laboratory testing. A full-time representative from the testing agency should be on site
to monitor excavation and grading operation as well as the suitability of fill materials.

Suitable fill material should be placed in thin lifts (lift thickness depends on type of compaction equipment, but
in general, lifts of 8 inches loose measurement are recommended). The soil should be compacted by the
necessary compaction equipment to meet the specified compaction recommendations.

Self-propelled compactors similar to Caterpillar Model 815 with tamping feet or sheepsfoot rollers may be
required to adequately compact fine-grained fill material (silts and clay). If the fill material is granular (sands and
gravels) with less than 10% clays and silts, smooth-drum vibratory compactors should be used. In addition, a
smooth-drum roller should be provided to “seal” the fill at the end of each workday to reduce the impact of
precipitation. In areas undergoing removal of seepage water, the engineered fill should be limited to well-graded
sand and gravel or crushed stone.

Within small excavations, such as in utility trenches (less than 24 inches in width), around manholes or behind
retaining walls, we recommend the use of "wacker packers", "Rammax" compactors or vibrating plate
compactors to achieve the specified compaction. Loose lift thickness of 4 inches are recommended in small area
fills.

7
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building
We recommend that structural fill and backfill be compacted in accordance with the criteria stated in Table 1. A
qualified field representative should periodically observe fill placement operations and perform field density tests
at various locations throughout each lift, including trench backfill, to indicate if the specified compaction is being
achieved.

TABLE 1
STRUCTURAL FILL PLACEMENT GUIDELINES

Compaction Recommendation Moisture Content

Areas of Fill Placement (ASTM D698-Standard
Proctor) (Percent of Optimum)
Granular cushion beneath Floor Slab and
95% 0 to minus 5%
over Footings
Structural fill supporting Footings
98% 0 to minus 5%
Structural fill placed within 5 feet beyond the
95% 0 to minus 5%
perimeter of the building pad
Grade-raise fill placed within 1 foot of the
92% 0 to minus 5%
base of the pavement
Structural fill placed below the base of the
95% 0 to minus 5%
Pavement Soil Subgrade
Utility Trenches - Within building and
98% 0 to minus 5%
pavement areas
Beneath Landscaped/Grass Areas 98% 0 to minus 5%

Compaction of any fill by flooding is not considered acceptable. This method will generally not achieve the
desired compaction and the large quantities of water will tend to soften the foundation soils.

5.4 Foundation Design

Based on the results of the soil test borings, laboratory testing and our engineering evaluation, it is our opinion
that the subsurface conditions are suitable for supporting the proposed structure on a conventional shallow
foundation. We recommend that footings be designed for a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of
2000 psf on the soil. The net allowable bearing pressures refer to the bearing pressure at foundation level in
excess of the surrounding overburden pressure and does not include footing weight, backfill weight, or slab
weight.

Footings should have minimum dimensions in accordance with local buildings codes.
8
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building
All footings should be located so that the smallest lateral clear distance between footings will be at least equal to
the difference in their bearing elevations. If this distance cannot be maintained, the lower footing should be
designed to account for the load imparted by the upper footing.

The recommended soil bearing capacity includes a factor of safety of at least 4 against shear failure.

It is possible that some soils at the site will have an allowable soil bearing pressure less than the recommended
design value. Therefore, foundation bearing surface evaluations should be performed by an GAC representative
during footing construction to aid in the identification of such soils. After the evaluations and any required
remedial measures are performed, concrete should be placed as quickly as possible to avoid exposure of the
foundation sub-soils to wetting, drying or freezing. If soils in the areas of foundation support are subjected to
such conditions, the footings should be re-evaluated.

5.5 Floor Slab Subgrade Preparation

The soil subgrade in the areas of concrete slab-on-grade support is often disturbed during foundation and
superstructure construction. Additionally, floor slab areas are often disturbed by construction equipment traffic
between the time of initial grading and final pavement construction. The subgrade should be excavated to the
design depth of the bottom of slab gravels. To prepare the subgrade, the top eight inches of the subgrade should
be compacted to a minimum of 98% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D698-91, Standard
Proctor Moisture-Density Relationship. The moisture content should also be controlled to 0 to minus 6% of the
optimum.

The final subgrade should be proof-rolled and evaluated by a representative of GAC immediately prior to
placement of the engineered fill to detect any localized areas of instability or soft areas. If unstable soils are
encountered which cannot be adequately densified in place, such soils should be removed and replaced with
well-compacted fill material placed in accordance with the Structural Fill section of this report. The subgrade
should be graded to a shallower slope than five horizontal to one vertical (5H:1V) prior to receiving general
engineered fill material to reduce the effects of differential fill thicknesses. The prepared subgrade should be
protected from drying, excessive moisture, and freezing.

9
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

5.6 Floor Slab Design

The recommended bearing capacity of the floor slab is 2000 psf. Should a greater bearing capacity be required,
GAC should review the recommendations presented in this report.

The granular cushion beneath the floor slab, should be free-draining, well-graded and compacted by vibration
prior to pouring the floor slab. A minimum of 4 inches of granular fill should be provided below the slab. he
granular fill should be compacted according to the recommendations given in Structural Fills section of this
report. The recommended minimum gravel thicknesses are required to promote uniform distribution of floor
loads to the subgrade, and to bridge over newly constructed fill areas such as utility trenches. Thicker gravel
courses may be required for structural considerations.
The slab-on-grade unit should be allowed to float independently of all load-bearing walls and columns. Floating
the floor slab independent from the wall and column loads with movable and/or expansion joints will be critical
in minimizing the potential cracking which can occur along and around the proposed foundation system. In
regards to the wall/floor structural detail, expansion joints and gap spacing are recommended at the wall/floor
connection. A half-inch gap for movement between the floor slab and insulation board is recommended along
with a bond break that allows independent movement between the floor slab and masonry block wall. A 4-inch-
thick granular cushion is also recommended between the floor slab and top of column pad and wall footings.
Resting the floor slab on top of column pads and wall footings is not recommended.

Assuming the previously mentioned recommendations are performed, the risk associated with floor slab cracking
will be reduced.

5.7 Pavement Subgrade Preparation

The subgrade should be proofrolled with a fully-loaded dump truck, scraper, or similar rubber-tired equipment
weighing at least 25 tons or a 10-ton vibratory steel drum roller. Do not use vibratory rollers to proofroll
materials containing significant amounts (>10%) of fines if the subgrade materials are wet or near groundwater
levels, since vibratory rollers tend to wick water to the surface.

10
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building
Proofrolling operations should be observed by a representative of GAC. Unstable and unsuitable soils, which
are revealed by proof-rolling and which cannot be adequately densified in-place, should be removed under the
direction of the GAC representative. It may be necessary to perform selective removal of soft, wet soils and/or
stabilize existing soft soils in-place. If required, the methods of stabilization will typically include incorporating
fly ash, a lift of crushed stone materials, or a geosynthetic over the soft soils. The identification of areas that may
require undercutting and/or stabilization should be based on the actual conditions at the time of construction, and
will depend on the location of the soft area.

The subgrade should be compacted to a minimum of 98% of the maximum proctor density of ASTM D-698-91,
Standard Proctor Moisture-Density Relationship. The moisture content should also be controlled to 0 to minus
5% of the optimum. The subgrade should be tested by a representative of GAC and approved for placement of
select fill.

5.8 Pavement Design

The final subgrade should be proofrolled immediately prior to placement of the concrete or asphalt to detect any
localized areas of instability. Unstable areas should be reworked to provide a uniform subgrade. For a subgrade
prepared in this manner, we estimate a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value of 2.5 125 psi

Our recommended pavement thickness designs are based on a subgrade prepared as recommended in the
Pavement Subgrade Preparation section above. A pavement design life of 20 years is used. AASHTO pavement
design procedures were used to estimate the required pavement thicknesses. The following parameters were
adopted for the thickness design:
• CBR value: 2.5
• Working stress (PCC) 600 psi
The Standard-Duty and Heavy-Duty pavement recommendations are based on a design life of 20 years, terminal
serviceability = 2.0, reliability = 85%, initial serviceability = 4.2, and standard deviation = 0.45 for flexible
pavements and 0.35 for rigid pavements.

11
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building
Based on the above design parameters, we recommend the following minimum pavement design thickness.

TABLE 2
ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT THICKNESS RECOMMENDATIONS

Traffic Area Granular Subbase Recommended Pavement Section

Thickness (inches)

Standard Duty Pavement 12 6.0

Heavy Duty Pavement 12 7.5

Alternatively, the following minimum pavement design thickness is recommended for Portland Cement Concrete
pavement.
TABLE 3
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT THICKNESS RECOMMENDATIONS

Traffic Area Granular Subbase Recommended Pavement Section

Thickness (inches)

Standard Duty Pavement 12 5.5

Heavy Duty Pavement 12 7.0

It is recommended that Portland cement concrete pavement with a minimum thickness of seven inches be used in
areas that will experience heavier stationary loads, such as trash dumpster pads and loading areas, and truck
loading and unloading areas.

Surface drainage around the pavement and proper maintenance are also important to long-term performance.
Curbs should be backfilled as soon as possible after construction of the pavement. Backfill should be compacted
and should be sloped to prevent water from ponding and infiltration under the pavement. All pavement joints
should be caulked and any cracks should be quickly patched or sealed to prevent moisture from reaching and
softening the subgrade.

12
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

5.9 Drainage and Groundwater Considerations

The site should be graded to provide positive drainage to reduce storm water infiltration. A minimum gradient of
one percent for asphalt areas should be maintained. A three percent gradient should be maintained for
landscaped areas immediately adjacent (within 10 feet) to the building. In general, water should not be allowed
to collect near the surface of the foundation or floor slab areas of the structures during or after construction. If
water were allowed to accumulate next to the foundation, it would provide an available source of free water to
the expansive soil underlying the foundation. Similarly, surface water drainage patterns or swales must not be
altered so that runoff is allowed to collect next to the foundation.

Temporary drainage provisions should be established, as necessary, to minimize water runoff into the
construction areas. Since soils generally tend to soften when exposed to free water, provisions should be made to
remove seepage water from excavations, should it occur. Also, undercut or excavated areas should be sloped
toward one corner to facilitate the collection and removal of rainwater or surface runoff. Adequate protection
against sloughing of soils should be provided for workers and inspectors entering the excavations. This
protection should meet O.S.H.A. and other applicable building codes.

Ground water seepage was not encountered in our borings during drilling. However, minor ground water seepage
may be encountered within the proposed building foundation, utility trenches and grading excavations at the time
of construction, especially after periods of heavy precipitaion. Small quantities of seepage may be handled by
conventional sump and pump methods of dewatering.

6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES

The recommendations presented in this report are contingent on GAC observing and/or monitoring:

• Proofrolling and fill Subgrade conditions;

• Backfilling and compaction of excavations;
• Suitability of borrow materials;
• Fill placement and compaction;
• Foundation subgrades; and
• Compliance with the geotechnical recommendations.

13
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

7.0 CLOSURE

We trust that this report will assist you in the design and construction of the proposed project. GAC appreciates
the opportunity to provide our services on this project and looks forward to working with you during
construction and on future projects. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

This report was prepared by Jim Doe, CET and was reviewed by Jane Smith, PE

Respectfully submitted,

Grade A Consultants

Jim Doe, CET Jane Smith, PE

Technologist Senior Engineer

14
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

APPENDIX A
LIMITATIONS
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Dave Brown for the design of the proposed development
described in Section 2. The report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written
permission of Universal Waste Services and Grade A Consultants. This report was prepared in accordance with
current, generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No other warrantee is provided.

GAC should be allowed the opportunity to review the geotechnical aspects of plans and specifications prior to
construction, to allow confirmation of the correct interpretation of the recommendations provided in this report.

Foundation, earthworks, underground construction, and pavement construction should be undertaken only with
full time monitoring by qualified personnel. GAC can provide these services on request.

The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from a limited
number of widely spaced subsurface explorations. The nature and extent of variations between these
explorations may not become evident until construction or further investigation. If variations or other latent
conditions do become evident, it will be necessary to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report.

The recommendations contained herein are not intended to dictate construction methods or sequences. Instead,
they are furnished solely to help designers identify potential construction problems related to foundation and
earth plans and specifications, based upon findings derived from sampling. Depending upon the final design
chosen for the project, the recommendations may also be useful to personnel who observe construction activity.
Potential contractors for the project must evaluate potential construction problems on the basis of their review of
the contract documents, their own knowledge of and experience in the local area, and on the basis of similar
projects in other localities, taking into account their own proposed methods and procedures.

The Scope of Services did not include any environmental assessment for the presence or absence of wetlands or
hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater, or air, on or below or around this site. Any
statements in this report or on the boring logs regarding odors, colors or unusual or suspicious items or
conditions are strictly for the information of the client.
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

APPENDIX B
DRAWINGS
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

APPENDIX C
BOREHOLE LOGS
Geotechnical Site Assessment
Transfer Station Building

APPENDIX D
LABORATORY RESULTS