Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Law On Sales Summary Chapter 4
Law On Sales Summary Chapter 4
Law On Sales Summary Chapter 4
ART. 1495. The vendor is bound to transfer the ownership of and deliver,
as well as warrant the thing which is the object of the sale.
In all the different modes of delivery, the critical factor which gives legal effect to the
act is the actual intention of the vendor to deliver, and its acceptance by the vendee.
The act, without the intention, is insufficient. There is no tradition.
Although transfer of ownership is the primary purpose of sale, delivery remains an
indispensable requisite as our law does not admit the doctrine of transfer of
ownership of property by mere consent.
The delivery must be made to the vendee or his authorized representative. Where the
vendee did not name any person to whom the delivery shall be made in his behalf,
the vendor is bound to deliver exclusively to him.
(2) Liability in case of loss. — When the thing subject of the sale is placed in the control
and possession of the vendee or his agent, the delivery is complete and the vendee cannot
avoid liability in case the thing is subsequently lost without the fault of the vendor.
(3) Right of vendor to claim payment. — Delivery produces its natural effects in law, the
principal and most important of which being the transfer of ownership without prejudice
to the right of the vendor to claim payment of the price. Where the buyer has not become
the owner for lack of delivery, his action is not accion reinvidicatoria (action for
reconveyance) but one against the vendor for specific performance or rescission, with
damages in either case.
(4) Consummation of contract. — Delivery of the thing together with the payment of the
price, marks the consummation of the contract of sale.
ART. 1498. When the sale is made through a public instrument, the execution
thereof shall be equivalent to the delivery of the thing which is the object of the
contract, if from the deed the contrary does not appear or cannot clearly be
inferred. With regard to movable property, its delivery may also be made by the
delivery of the keys of the place or depository where it is stored or kept.
(a) If it appears from the document or it can be inferred therefrom that it was not the
intention of the parties to make delivery, no tradition can be deemed to have taken place.
Such would be the case, for instance, where a certain date is fixed when the purchaser
should take possession of the thing, or where the vendor reserves the right to use and
enjoy the property until a certain period, or where it is stipulated that until payment of
the last installment is made, the title to the property should not be deemed to have been
transmitted, or where the vendor has no control over the thing sold at the moment of the
sale, and, therefore, its material delivery could not have been made.
(b) Presumptive delivery by execution of public instrument can also be negated by failure
of the vendee to take material possession of the land subject of the sale in the concept of
purchaser-owner. The continued possession by the vendor of the property sold may make
dubious (doubting) the contract of sale between the parties.