Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topic: Contract Consideration With Reference To Indemnity Law and Guarantee
Topic: Contract Consideration With Reference To Indemnity Law and Guarantee
Topic: Contract Consideration With Reference To Indemnity Law and Guarantee
Submitted by:
A053
Submitted To:
INTRODUCTION:
Consideration: “Something which is given and taken. “Section 2 (d) of Contract Act 1872
defines contract as “When at the desire of the promissory, the promise or any other person
has done or abstained from doing or does or abstains from doing or promise to do or abstain
from doing. Something such act or abstinence or promise is called consideration for the
promise.”
Consideration is a benefit which must be bargained for between the parties, and is the
essential reason for a party entering into a contract. Consideration must be of value and is
exchanged for the performance or promise of performance by the other party (such
exchanged for another consideration. Acts which are illegal or so immoral that they are
against established public policy cannot serve as consideration for enforceable contracts.
Contracts may become unenforceable or rescindable for failure of consideration when the
performance is not made properly. Acts which are illegal or so immoral that they are against
Importance of Consideration:
Consideration is the foundation of every contract. The law insists on the existence of
Types of Consideration:
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 3
1) Executory
2) Executed
3) Past consideration
1) Executed consideration is an act in return for a promise. If, for example A offers a reward
of lost property, his promise becomes binding when B performs the act of returning A’s
property to him, A is not bound to pay anything to anyone until the prescribed act is done.
2) Executory consideration is a promise given for a promise. If, for example, customer orders
goods which shopkeeper undertakes to obtain from the manufacturer, the shopkeeper
promises to supply the goods and the customer promises to accept and pay for them. Neither
has yet done anything but each has given a promise to obtain the promise of the other. It
would be breach of contract if either withdrew without the consent of the other.
3) Past consideration which as general rule is not sufficient to make the promise binding. In
such a case the promisor may by his promise recognize a moral obligation (which is not
consideration), but he is not obtaining anything in exchange for his promise (as he already
If there is no consideration present in a contract, the contract becomes invalid, and the courts
may refuse to enforce the contract. Sometimes, a contract may lack consideration though it
may seem at the surface that the parties are exchanging something of value.
CONTRACT OF INDEMNITY:
An indemnity contract is a legal arrangement between two parties in which one party agrees
to pay another party for a loss or harm that meets certain requirements and conditions unless
Agreement of indemnity is represented by Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872,
which falls under Chapter VIII of the act. Under this section, the meaning of an agreement of
“By which one party vows to save the other from misfortune caused to him by the agreement
of the promisor himself, or by the lead of some other individual, is known as a “contract of
indemnity.”
The Indemnifier:
The promisor, who agrees to make up the damage caused to the other group, is called the
indemnifier.
The Indemnified:
The person who is assured of compensation for the damage incurred (if any) is referred to as
Section 125, defines the rights of an indemnity holder. These are as follows - The Promisee
(Indemnity holder) in a contract of indemnity, acting within the scope of his authority, is
Rights of Indemnifier:
After compensating the indemnity holder, indemnifier is entitled to all the ways and means
by which the indemnifier might have protected himself from the loss. Relevant Case Laws.
Our Indian law on contract, as given under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, makes a fruitful
endeavor to give the “sense” of the articulation “consideration form promise “. Section 2(d)
of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states the “sense” of the word consideration as: “When, at
the longing of the promisor, the Promisee or some other individual has done or went without
doing, or does or swears off doing, or vows to do or to avoid doing, something, such
The sense of “consideration” as given in Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872,
neither “defines” the expression “consideration” nor is it “substantive” in nature. The very
nature of the “sense” of the term “consideration for promise” as provided under the said
section is “procedural”.
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 6
According to Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, there can’t be any arrangement
without thought; it makes it abundantly clear that any arrangement without thought is void. In
this way, one can’t fathom or imagine an agreement (even exceptional agreements) without
thought.
CONTRACT OF GUARANTEE:
A Contract to perform the promise, or discharge the liability, of a third person in case of his
The person on whose default the guarantee is given is called the Principal Debtor.
Section 126: "A contract of guarantee is a contract to perform the promise, or to discharge
the liabilities of a third person in case of his default. The person who gives the guarantee is
called Surety, the person in respect of whose default the guarantee is given is called Principal
Debtor, and the person to whom the guarantee is given is called Creditor. A Guarantee may
promise for the execution, completion, or existence of something. A guarantee can also be a
English law defines a ‘guarantee’ as a ‘promise to answer for the debt, default or miscarriage
of another’.
the creditor.
Second, if the principal debtor makes a default, the surety undertakes to be liable to
the creditor.
Thirdly, the principal debtor's implicit promise in support of the assurance that, in the
event that the protection is obliged to discharge the responsibility of the principal
debtor's default, the principal debtor shall indemnify the protection for it.
1. The contract can be either oral or in writing. Nevertheless, the assurance contract can
2. The guarantee contract presumes a principal liability or a discharge duty on the part of
the principal debtor. Even if there is no such principal liability, one party agrees to
pay another under such situations, and the enforcement of this obligation is not
clear consideration between the creditor and the assurance that it is appropriate that
the creditor has done anything for the good of the principal debtor.
According to section 127 of the act, anything is done or any promise made for the benefit of
the principal debtor is sufficient consideration to the surety for giving the guarantee. The
consideration must be a fresh consideration given by the creditor and not a past consideration.
It is not necessary that the guarantor must receive any consideration and sometimes even
tolerance on the part of the creditor in case of default is also enough consideration.
Illustrations:
B requests A to sell and deliver to him goods on credit. A agrees to do so provided C will
guarantee the payment of the price of the goods. C promises to guarantee the payment in
consideration of A’s promise to deliver the goods. This is sufficient consideration for C’s
promise.
In State Bank of India v Premco Saw Mill (1983), the State Bank gave notice to the debtor-
defendant and also threatened legal action against her, but her husband agreed to become
surety and undertook to pay the liability and also executed a promissory note in favor of the
State Bank and the Bank refrained from threatened action. It was held that such patience and
acceptance on the bank’s part constituted good consideration for the surety.
For this situation, the offended party’s organization was in the process of liquidation and was
being addressed by the authority’s outlet. The offended party’s organization was going about
as the commission specialist for the litigant firm for the purchase offer of a specific
merchandise. Further the respondent firm was to repay the offended party organization
against all misfortune and loss in regard to such transaction. The respondent firm neglected to
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 9
get the conveyance due to which the products were exchanged by the seller at not exactly the
agreement cost. The offended party, therefore, sued for the recuperation of the whole. The
The offended party offered a burdened land to the Respondent, who vowed to make required
which the offended party brought about misfortune as 3/4th of their property being sold. The
The plaintiff executed two mortgages in favor of Mohandas at the command of the defendant.
Defendant promised to indemnify the plaintiff against any suits by the mortgagee, along with
executing a third mortgage in place of the previous two (by the means of a letter). Plaintiff
requested to release of liability. The issues raised were whether the indemnified could ask for
performance of the contract of indemnity without suffering any actual loss and whether the
obligation of the plaintiff was absolute. It was held that the sections 124 and 125 do not
Conclusion:
All things considered, we have found in this current venture simply put, Indemnity
necessitates that one party indemnify the other if certain costs talked about in the contract of
indemnity are caused by him. For instance, vehicle rental organizations specify that the
individual employing will be answerable for harm to the rental vehicle brought about by his
The contract of guarantee is a specific contract for which the Indian Contract Acy has laid
some rules. As we have discussed, the basic function of a contract of guarantee is to protect
the creditor from loss and to give him confidence that the contract will be enforced with the
References:
https://blog.ipleaders.in/indemnity-contracts-guarantee-and-consideration/
https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-4039-contract-of-indemnity-and-
guarantee.html#:~:text=There%20are%20two%20parties%20in,of%20guarantee%20has
%20three%20parties.&text=The%20liability%20of%20the%20indemnifier%20in%20the
%20contract%20of%20indemnity,liability%20is%20of%20the%20debtor.
The Indian Contract Act 1872 (Act No. 9 of 1872), ssss. 124, 125, 126, 127
Osman Jamal and Sons Ltd. Vs Gopal Purshottam, AIR 1929 Cal 208
Lala Shanti Swarup vs Munshi Singh and Others, 1967 AIR 1315
State Bank of India v Premco Saw Mill (1983), AIR 1984 Guj 93
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 11