DKT 56 Re Emergency Application

Case 1:22-cv-03409-ER Document 56 Filed 06/13/22 Page 1 of 18
Emergency Application
Filed on 6/13/2022 9:55:22 AM
Docket 22cv3409 (SDNY) (30)
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
Ware v. United States, et al.
Submitted by:
The Office of Ulysses T. Ware
123 Linden Blvd.
Ste 9-L
Brooklyn, NY 11226
(718) 844-1260
utware007@gmail.com
/s/ Ulysses T. Ware
Monday, June 13, 2022
_____________________
Emergency request to the Office of the Chief District Judge, the Hon. Laura Taylor-Swain (SDNY)
to immediately sua sponte invoke Local Rule District Court (SDNY) 1.5(b)(5), (“L.R. 1.5(b)(5)”),
establish the required Disciplinary Committee, open a docket, and enter an emergency show
cause order directed to Damian Williams, Daniel Gitner, Margaret M. Garnett, Jun Xiang, Melissa
Childs, John M. McEnany, Alexander H. Southwell, Steven D. Feldman, Marlon G. Kirton, Edward
T.M. Garland, Manibur S. Arora, Michael F. Bachner, Gary G. Becker, David Mulcahy, Michael
Fitzpatrick Patrick, Thomas J. McCarthy, Katherine Polk-Failla, Sarah E. Paul, Maria E. Douvas,
Nicholas S. Goldin, David N. Kelly, Michael J. Garcia, Preet Bharara, Joon Kim, Audrey Strauss,
Merrick B. Garland, Jeffrey R. Ragsdale, Lisa Monaco, and Vernita Gupta, jointly, (the “Officers of
the Court”), to show cause why each shall not be disciplined by the Committee for Conspiracy to
Obstruct Justice and Fraud on the Court for (1) willful resistance and (2) willful disobedience to
the Final Judgments’ written and inherent commands, 18 USC 401(2) and 401(3), criminal
contempt of lawful court orders and judgments.
Page 1 of 18
(30) re: In re Damian Williams, Jun Xiang, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office (SDNY), L.R. District
Court (SDNY) 1.5(b)(5) request for emergency relief and the opening of a docket for
disciplinary proceedings.
Certificate of Service
The government was served with this pleading on 06.13.22 via Damian Williams at
damian.williams@usdoj.gov, Jun Xiang was served at jun.xiang@usdoj.gov, and
Merrick B. Garland, via Jeffrey R. Ragsdale, at Jeffrey.ragsdale@usdoj.gov.
Page 2 of 18
The Office of Ulysses T. Ware

123 Linden Blvd., Ste 9-L
Brooklyn, NY 11226
(718) 844-1260
utware007@gmail.com

Via email and regular mail
Office of the Chief District Judge
U.S. District Court (SDNY)
500 Pearl St.
New York, NY 10007
The Hon. Laura Taylor-Swain
Re: In re Damian Williams and Merrick B. Garland, et al., 22 misc. ____ (SDNY).
L.R. 1.5(b)(5) District Court (SDNY) disciplinary supervisory authority
Request for emergency disciplinary action for 18 USC 401(2), 401(3), criminal contempt
of the Brady Court Orders, and Final Judgments by the Officers of the Court.
Chief Judge Taylor-Swain:

I.
A. Introduction and statement of fact.
Mr. Ware, the petitioner in Ware v. USA, et al., 22cv3409 (SDNY), and the defendant in
United States v. Ware, 04cr1224 (SDNY), and United States v. Ware, 05cr1115 (SDNY), jointly,
(the “DOJ’s Jim Crow Hate Crime Conspiracy”), is filing this emergency application for the District
Court (SDNY) pursuant to its inherent supervisory authority to insure the fidelity and full and
complete compliance with all lawful court orders, to wit, (1) the Brady Court Orders, (2) the Rule
41(a)(2) final judgment, and (3) the August 18, 2009, final judgment entered in United States v.
Page 3 of 18
Ware, 07-5670cr (XAP) (2d Cir.), Gov.-I, jointly, (the “Final Judgments”), to enter an emergency
order directed to the Officers of the Court named in the caption to immediately within the next
two (2) days, not later than Wednesday, June 15, 2022, to show cause in writing why each shall
not be disciplined by the District Court’s inherent supervisory authority ordered to show cause
why each shall not be held in civil and willful criminal contempt of the Final Judgments.1
In support of this emergency application, Mr. Ware incorporates by reference, in heac
verba, Dkts. 1-55 in Ware v. USA, et al., 22cv3409 (SDNY), and makes the same a part hereof, in
addition to (1) the deliberate and intentionally unfiled and undocketed pleading 53A-9,
01.17.2022, submitted in 04cr1224 and 05cr1115, Ex. 1, infra; however, Ex. 1 was refused to be
docketed by District Judge Edgardo Ramos as a fraud on the court and an overt act in furtherance
of the conspiracy to aid and abet the civil and criminal contempt of the Final Judgments.
Judge Taylor-Swain, Mr. Ware reminds you that you have been named in 22cv3409(SDNY)
in your personal and individual capacity as an adverse party, a material fact witness, and as an
unindicted co-conspirator regarding your own personal and official criminal judicial misconduct
concerning your adamant illegal refusal in 2021 to exercise the District Court’s supervisory
authority and ensure the full and complete compliance with the Final Judgments by the USAO’s
prosecutors and others that have appeared before the District Court (SDNY) in the DOJ’s Jim
Crow Hate Crime Conspiracy Cases.
1
Mr. Ware is the petitioner in the Ware v. USA, et al., 28 USC 2241(a) actual innocent habeas corpus
petition. Mr. Ware filed the petition on March 21, 2022, and no actions whatsoever have been taken by
the District Court, see 28 USC 2243 entry of the required show cause order. Mr. Ware has, is, and will
continue to suffer irreparable harm to his personal and business each day until the 22cv3409 (SDNY)
actual innocence claims are adjudicated on the merits and proceedings are held to address the civil and
criminal contempt of the Officers of the Court and other matters concerning government trial exhibits GX
1-4 and GX-5 (04cr1224), the Illegal Contracts.
United States Attorney (SDNY) Andre Damian Williams, Jr., is the current legal representative for the
government in the DOJ’s Jim Crow Hate Crime Conspiracy cases and is in current malicious civil and willful
criminal contempt, 18 USC 401(2) and 401(3), of the Final Judgments.
Page 4 of 18
Judge Taylor-Swain, the DOJ’s Jim Crow Hate Crime cases have reached a gangrenous
posture due to the unmitigated criminal influence of yourself, Damian Williams,2 other DOJ
executives, and officers of the court that arranged, planned and orchestrated the nefarious and
malicious Jim Crow racially-motivated hate crime conspiracy willfully and knowingly perpetrated
against Mr. Ware for his refusal to criminally violate the federal securities laws, RICO law, 18 USC
1961(6)(A), and N.Y. Penal Law, §190.40, the criminal usury law,3 a class E felony, and issue
bogus and illegal Rule 144(k) legal opinions to the 02cv2219 (SDNY) “Civil Plaintiffs,” unregistered
broker-dealers and 15 USC 77b(a)(11) statutory underwriters legally illegible for Rule 144 per
SEC Release 33-7190 n. 17 (1995).
Thus, as a matter of law, ipso facto, you are per se disqualified from any and all judicial
involvement in the resolution of this emergency application; and according to the processes and
procedures of the District Court (SDNY) and the Rules of Conduct for Federal Judges you are
required to (1) immediately notify the Office of the Chief Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit and
the Executive Director of the Administrative Office of the U. S. Courts and (2) request that any
action on this emergency application be conducted by independent members of the Disciplinary
Committee selected not by you but selected by the Chief Circuit Judge given your actual and
apparent conflict of interest in the outcome of this emergency application.
II.
A. Conclusion and requested relief.
2
3
See the March 15, 2022, decision in Adar Bays, LLC v. GeneSys ID, Inc., 18-3023 (2d Cir.) which ruled the
government’s trial exhibits in U.S. v. Ware, 04cr1224 (SDNY), GX 1-4 (the illegal Notes) and GX-5 (the
illegal subscription agreement), jointly, (the “Illegal Contracts”), were (1) illegal contracts, (2),
unenforceable, (3) null and void ab initio, and (4) constituted the criminal violation of N.Y. Penal Law,
§190.40, the criminal usury law, a class E felony; and by necessary implication also violated 18 USC
1961(6)(A), the racketeering offense for the creation and collection of a criminal usury unlawful debt.
Page 5 of 18
Mr. Ware is respectfully requesting that the Office of the Chief District Judge (SDNY)
undertake the following actions:
1. to immediately under the District Court’s emergency procedures sua sponte invoke Local
Rule District Court (SDNY) 1.5(b)(5), (“L.R. 1.5(b)(5)”),
2. establish the required independent Disciplinary Committee,
3. open a public docket in the District Court (SDNY), In re Damian Williams and Merrick B.
Garland, et al., 22 misc. _____ (SDNY), and
4. enter an emergency show cause order directed to Damian Williams, Daniel Gitner,
Margaret M. Garnett, Jun Xiang, Melissa Childs, John M. McEnany, Alexander H.
Southwell, Steven D. Feldman, Marlon G. Kirton, Edward T.M. Garland, Manibur S. Arora,
Wendy L. Hagenau, M. Regina Thomas, Patricia Sinback, Joyce Bihary, C. Ray Mullins,
Michael F. Bachner, Gary G. Becker, David Mulcahy, Michael Fitzpatrick Patrick, Thomas
J. McCarthy, Katherine Polk-Failla, Sarah E. Paul, Maria E. Douvas, Nicholas S. Goldin,
David N. Kelly, Michael J. Garcia, Preet Bharara, Joon Kim, Audrey Strauss, Merrick B.
Garland, Jeffrey R. Ragsdale, Lisa Monaco, and Vernita Gupta, jointly, (the “Officers of the
Court”),
5. to show cause why each Officer of the Court shall not be disciplined by the Committee for
Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice and Fraud on the Court for (1) willful resistance and (2)
willful disobedience to the Final Judgments’ written and inherent commands, 18 USC
401(2) and 401(3), criminal contempt of lawful court orders and judgments.
Judge Taylor-Swain, given the gravity and the public interest in this emergency
application, Mr. Ware will contact the District Court again on June 15, 2022, at 12:00 noon
and inquiry what, if any, official actions have been taken regarding this emergency
application’s request. For whatever reason, if the District Court (SDNY) refuses to respect Mr.
Ware’s right to due process of law, and address Mr. Ware’s concerns expressed in this
Page 6 of 18
emergency application, Mr. Ware will exercise his legal rights and seek emergency relief in
the appropriate venue and forum.
Sincerely,
Ulysses T. Ware
__________________________
/s/ Ulysses T. Ware
Enclosure: Exhibit 1: Unfiled and undocketed item 53A-9 (01.17.22) submitted in 04cr1224
and 05cr1115 (SDNY) (Ramos, J.).
Page 7 of 18
Exhibit 1
Item 53A-9
01.17.22
Page 8 of 18
Offices of Ulysses T. Ware

123 Linden Blvd.
Suite 9-L
Brooklyn, NY 11226
(718) 844-1260
Utware007@gmail.com
January 17, 2022
Via regular mail and via email to Asst. Attorney General Jeffrey R. Ragsdale c/o:
Office of the Attorney General of the United States
The Hon. Merrick B. Garland
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, D.C. 20530
Request to open a racketeering investigation, 18 USC 1968(a), et seqs.
RE: United States v. Ware, 04cr1224 (SDNY), (“1224”) and United States v. Ware, 05cr1115
(SDNY), (“1115”), (the “Ware Cases”). Official notice of material fact witness and
unindicted co-conspirator status.
Attorney General Garland:
1. Please be advised that the undersigned, the defendant in the Ware Cases, hereby this 17th
day of January 2022, pursuant to 18 USC 1961 et seqs. has officially designated the individuals
and entities listed in Exhibit 15, infra, as material fact witnesses and unindicted co-conspirators.
The Unindicted Co-Conspirators have since on or before 2002, continuously without interruption
to the present, January 2022, in the Southern District of New York, Atlanta, GA, Las Vegas, NV,
and elsewhere, have been knowing, willing, deliberate, intentional, and eager participants,
directly and/or indirectly, in an illegal association-in-fact, a continuing criminal enterprise, as
Page 9 of 18
defined in 18 USC 1961(4);4 and each person or entity has knowing and deliberately with criminal
intent, and with an evil and criminal Jim Crow racially-motivated motive and objective,
implemented, carried out and executed in interstate commerce, by the use of the means and
instrumentalities of interstate commerce, two or more racketeering activities as defined in 18
USC 1961(a), et seqs.;5 and directly and/or indirectly caused massive and extraordinary damages,
injuries, and harms to Ulysses T. Ware, Group Management, Silver Screen Studios, IVG Corp.,
and Global One Investment Group, jointly (the “Victims” or “Racketeering Victims”).
Mr. Garland, the Racketeering Victims are respectfully requesting that the Department of
Justice’s criminal division and Division on Public Integrity open immediately an 18 USC 1968(a)
racketeering investigation concerning the individuals and entities named in Exhibit 15, attached
hereto, and made a part hereof, regarding the racketeering activities committed before, during,
and after the Ware Cases were allegedly adjudicated in the federal courts. Albeit, in the “clear
absence of all jurisdiction” in the personal and individual capacities of the federal judges, court
employees, Securities and Exchange Commission employees and officials, U.S. Probation Office
employees and officers, FBI employees, and DOJ employees and officials involved in the illegal
prosecutions of the Ware Cases.
Mr. Garland, in Mr. Ware’s January 11, 2022, communication and inquiry to you in your
official capacity as the USAG. Mr. Ware requested a response date of January 21, 2022, at 12:00
noon if you or the DOJ had any official objection, disagreement, challenge, or opposition to the
facts and allegations contained in the inquiry.
418 USC 1961(4): “enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or
other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal
entity.
5 Kidnapping, conspiracy, securities fraud, bankruptcy conspiracy, mail and wire fraud,
racketeering, obstruction of justice, perjury, grand jury conspiracy, money laundering, hate
crimes, etc.
Page 10 of 18
Accordingly, Mr. Ware hereby this 17th day of January 2022, notifies you and the DOJ that
if there is no official response in opposition, disagreement, objection, or challenge filed in the
federal courts on the record to the January 11, 2022, inquiry’s allegations and facts by January
21, 2022, then Mr. Ware will file a sworn copy of the January 11, 2022, inquiry into the courts as
the stipulated facts of the parties, (the “Stipulated Facts”), and request emergency judicial relief
based on the Stipulated Facts for the courts to order and conduct evidentiary and sanctioning
proceedings in regard to the flagrant and criminal judicial and prosecutorial misconduct
committed in the Ware Cases.
Furthermore, it will be agreed, accepted, and deemed as the undisputed stipulated
material fact, estoppel by acquiesce, that the Stipulated Facts provides sufficient factual basis
on all necessary factual elements for racketeering claims, Federal Tort Claim Act claims, New York
State, Georgia State, and Bivens civil rights claims relief in favor of the Racketeering Victims in
the sum certain amount of $2.225 billion dollars, liquidated and stipulated damages, plus costs,
expenses, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages for racketeering civil claims.
Mr. Garland, even a cursory and incomplete review of the records6 in the Ware Cases will
confirm there is an immoral, rotten, insidious, pernicious, and illegal criminality involved in the
due administration of justice in the federal courts. One needs to look no further than the crimes
6
Dkt 32, August 10, 2007, (04cr1224) (Sweet, J.) and Dkt. 17, May 19, 2006, (05cr1115)(Pauley, J.), (the “Brady Court
Orders”) existence cannot be rationally debated or opposed, given the USAO consented to the entry of the Brady
Court Orders.
Page 11 of 18
committed by Unindicted Co-Conspirators District Judges Laura Taylor-Swain7, Edgardo Ramos8,

Williams H. Pauley, III, Robert W. Sweet, Thomas W. Thrash, Jr.,9 Timothy C. Batten, Sr.,10 Wendy
L. Hagenau,11 et al. regarding the respective proceedings before their courts. Chronic criminality
and illegality orchestrated and coordinated by the illegal association-in-fact, the continuing
7
The Chief District Judge (SDNY) has knowingly, deliberately, intentionally, in bad faith, and with an evil and criminal
motive has obstructed, delayed, impeded, frustrated, and prevented the due administration of justice with respect
to Marlon G. Kirton, and the DOJ prosecutors being held accountable for obvious violations of Local Rule District
Court (SDNY) 1.5(b)(5); and moreover, Judge Taylor-Swain has impeded and obstructed all of Mr. Ware’s application
for entry of a supervisory writ directed to the USAO (SDNY) to address the issues regarding its compliance with the
Brady Court Orders entered in the Ware Case viz-a-viz, 18 USC 401(3) criminal and civil contempt of court orders by
the DOJ prosecutors, while aided and abetted by District Judge Edgardo Ramos. Without any doubt Chief Judge
Taylor-Swain and Judge Edgardo Ramos have knowingly and willfully committed high crimes and misdemeanors,
impeachable offenses; and must be impeached and prosecuted for their crimes.
8
Edgardo Ramos, since July 2021, has knowingly, willfully, deliberately, intentionally, in bad faith, acted with an evil
and racially-motivated depravity and criminal intent, and has viciously and with hate and malice denied Mr. Ware
his constitutional rights under due process of law to have his claims adjudicated on the merits regarding the
enforcement of the Brady Court Orders’ commands, and on other issues and claims. Ramos has conspired and
colluded with the USAO and other politicians, which have criminally influenced Ramos to conceal and cover-up the
crimes committed by international Hobbs Act money laundering criminal enterprise, Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt), see
SEC v. Honig, 18cv08175 (SDNY) (Ramos, J.).
9
See Exhibit B, infra. Judge Thrash directly participated in Mr. Ware’s September 1, 2004, Atlanta, GA kidnapping by
the U.S. Marshals Service in an attempted armed robbery of Mr. Ware, while acting under the color of law, for and
on behalf of the 02cv2219 (SDNY) “Civil Plaintiffs,” admitted and confessed unregistered broker-dealers and Section
2(a)(11) statutory underwriters legally ineligible for Rule 144(k) exemption from Section 5 of the 1933 Securities Act
strict-liability registration requirements. See SEC Release 33-7190 n. 17 (1995).
10
Chief District Judge (NDGA) Batten has deliberately, intentionally, and in bad faith refused Mr. Ware all First and
Fifth Amendment right of access with respect to viewing, inspecting, and copying all judicial records and documents
in the alleged, purported, and unconfirmed 2008 In re Ulysses T. Ware (Evans, J.) disbarment proceedings. Judge
Batten, Judge Orinda D. Evans, former district clerk (NDGA) James N. Hatten, and former Chief Judge Julie E. Carnes
have knowingly and deliberately obstructed justice, and committed a fraud on the federal courts by manufacturing
or fabricating an illegal disbarment proceeding conducted and orchestrated in criminal violation of due process of
law while colluding and conspiring with the State Bar of Georgia’s lawyers and agents, to wit: Paula Fredrick, Bill
NeSmith (“Big Bill”), Jenny Mittlemen, Jonathan Hewitt, William A. Myers, Adrienne Nash, Dan O’Sullivan, William P.
Smith, III, Carmen Rojas-Rafter, and others.
11
See AOC Federal Tort Claims Act filings in the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts filed on June 6, 2021, for the
crimes and obstruction of justice committed by Chief Bankruptcy Judge (NDGA) Wendy L. Hagenau in her risible and
criminal attempted cover-up and concealment regarding matter in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case, In re Group
Management Corp., 03-93031-mhm (BC NDGA), while knowingly colluding and conspiring with the Atlanta, GA law
firm Kilpatrick, Townsend, & Stockton, LLP and their partners and former partners.
Page 12 of 18
criminal enterprise, which is currently a conspiratorial malignant cancer in the federal courts and
prosecutors’ offices.
Mr. Garland, given the gravity and the seriousness of this matter, it would be a severe
negligent and dereliction of official duty if the DOJ refused to address the issues and allegations
in the federal courts and remained silent regarding the official flagrant prosecutorial conduct of
DOJ prosecutors and the Unindicted Co-conspirators during all phases of the Ware Cases.
Sincerely,
/s/ Ulysses T. Ware

______________________________________
Ulysses T. Ware
January 17, 2022
cc: Edward T.M. Garland

Manny Arora
Wendy L. Hagenau (for service on the District Clerk (NDGA) and the Chief Judge NDGA)
State Bar of Georgia, Office of the General Counsel
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts c/o The Judicial Conference of the United States
Judicial Conference of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Marlon G. Kirton, Esq.
Damian Williams
District Judge Edgardo Ramos
District Judge Laura Taylor-Swain
Page 13 of 18
Exhibit 15
1. Jeffrey R. Ragsdale;
2. David N. Kelley, Michael J. Garcia, Joon Kim, Preet Bharara, Jeffrey Berman, Audrey
Strauss, Damian Williams;
3. Alexander H. Southwell, Steven D. Feldman, Nicholas S. Goldin, Maria E. Douvas, Sarah E.
Paul, Katherine Polk-Failla, Margaret M. Garnett, Daniel Gitner, Alexander J. Wilson,
Steven R. Peikin, David Makol, Maria E. Font, Andrew L. Fish, Melissa Childs, John M.
McEnany, the U.S. Marshals Service (NDGA) and (SDNY);
4. Edgardo Ramos, Laura Taylor-Swain, William H. Pauley, III, Robert W. Sweet, Michael H.
Dolinger, Andrew J. Peck, Ruby Krajick;
5. Timothy C. Batten, Sr., Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., Orinda D. Evans, Marvin H. Shoob, James
N. Hatten, Julie E. Carnes;
6. the State Bar of Georgia, Paula Fredrick, Bill NeSmith, Jenny Mittlemen, Adrienne Nash,
William A. Myers, Jonathan Hewitt, Dan O’Sullivan;
7. Edward T.M. Garland, Manibur S. Arora, Donald F. Samuel, David Levitt, Michael F.
Bachner, Gary G. Becker, Lisa Scolari, James H. Roth, Marlon G. Kirton;
8. Michael Fitzpatrick, Thomas J. McCarthy, David Mulcahy, Cathleen Tyler;
9. Jeffrey B. Norris, Spencer C. Barasch, Kent J. Dawson, Steven Korotash, Steven Webster,
John C. Martin, Robert C. Hannan, Joan E. McKown, Michael McAuliffe, Lucy Kish;
10. Amalya L. Kearse, Robert D. Sack, Peter W. Hall, Robert A. Katzmann, Barbara S. Jones;
Page 14 of 18
11. Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt)12, Ari Rabinowitz, Edward M. Grushko13, Barbara R. Mittman,
LH Financial Services, Kenneth A. Zitter, Kilpatrick, Townsend, & Stockton, LLP, Dennis S.
Meir, John W. Mills, III, J. Henry Walker, IV;
12. Margaret H. Murphy, Joyce Bihary, C. Ray Mullins, Wendy L. Hagenau, Patricia Sinback,
M. Regina Thomas, (the “Bankruptcy Court Employees”), see the Administrative Office of
the U.S. Courts Federal Tort Claim Act filings submitted by Mr. Ware on June 6, 2021, via
certified mail receipt 70191120000222690451, regarding the crimes and negligence
committed by the Bankruptcy Court Employees, Edgardo Ramos, and others;
13. Jeremy Jones, Myron Williams, Carlton Epps, Elrico Sadler;
14. Kent J. Dawson;
15. James Olas, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #314, U.S. Marshals Service (NDGA)
12The international money laundering criminal enterprise located in New York and managed by
LH Financial Services and unregistered investment advisor government 04cr1224 (SDNY) trial
witness Ari Rabinowitz. See Exhibits 3-1, 3-3, and 5, supra.
13
Alpha Capital, AG’s lawyer and convicted felon for conspiracy to commit securities fraud in (D.
NV).
14 James Olas, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, and John Doe #3, employees of the U.S. Marshals Service
(NDGA) on September 1, 2004, without a lawful and valid search warrant, arrest, or court order,
at approximately 2:00 pm, illegally entered the law office of Ulysses T. Ware, located at 101
Marietta St., Suite 1070, Atlanta, GA, 30303, with guns drawn, and threatened to murder Ulysses
T. Ware, terroristic threats of bodily harm, unless Mr. Ware, right then, issued bogus and
fraudulent Rule 144(k) legal opinions to the “Civil Plaintiffs,” unregistered broker-dealers and 15
USC 77b(a)(11) statutory underwriters of the securities of IVG Corp., a/k/a GPMT, named in
paragraph 8 of the United States v. Ware, 04cr1224 (SDNY) bogus, fraudulent, fabricated, and
moot indictment. See Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Page 15 of 18
Exhibit A
Report of the USPO re: September 1, 2004, kidnapping of Ulysses T. Ware by U.S. Marshals
(NDGA), cf. Exhibit B, Official DOJ email of AUSA Alexander H. Southwell.
Page 16 of 18
Exhibit B
Page 17 of 18
End of
document
Page 18 of 18

DKT 56 Re Emergency Application

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DKT 56 Re Emergency Application

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 1:22-cv-03409-ER Document 56 Filed 06/13/22 Page 1 of 18

The Office of Ulysses T. Ware

Monday, June 13, 2022

Chief Judge Taylor-Swain:

Offices of Ulysses T. Ware

January 17, 2022

Request to open a racketeering investigation, 18 USC 1968(a), et seqs.

Attorney General Garland:

committed by Unindicted Co-Conspirators District Judges Laura Taylor-Swain7, Edgardo Ramos8,

/s/ Ulysses T. Ware

cc: Edward T.M. Garland

You might also like