Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2115 House Stander - STAGE 1 Report
2115 House Stander - STAGE 1 Report
2115 House Stander - STAGE 1 Report
For
ERF 24
Prepared by
KLG Architects
Rev 1 – 2021-08-04
Page 1 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. THE BRIEF
1.1 General Project Information p. 03
1.2 Accommodation Schedule p. 04
3. BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS p. 12
5. PROJECT PROGRAMME
5.1 Development Programme p. 14
5.2 Construction Programme
6. METHODS OF CONTRACTING p. 15
7. NEXT STEPS p. 16
Page 2 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
1 THE BRIEF
1.1 GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
Description
Project Name House Stander
Project Description New House, Rooi Els
Page 3 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
1 THE BRIEF
1.2 Schedule of Accommodation
A good building is more than the sum of its parts, however, at this stage of the project it is useful to list the
requirements and elements which the building should ultimately contain. The list will serve as a general guide
for the concept design, and act as a measure to test the design against the brief, but it will also be
interrogated and expanded on through the design process.
Materials
Off shutter concrete
stone
natural materials
Large glazed elements
Other
Swimming pool Long and thin
Parking Can be pergola type structure only
Decks To extend living areas
Gas braai
Fire pit
Water catchment from roof Gutters not visible
Sensible solar/ PV
Page 4 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
Fig 2 – Zoning indicated as SR1 (yellow) on Overberg Integrated Zoning Scheme Map for Rooi Els
Erf 24 – 1840m²
Coverage – <50%
Maximum Floor Space – n/a
Max. height above base level –– 8m from base level
Permitted Encroachments
Uncovered stoeps
Swimming pools (less than 1m above natural ground level)
Page 5 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
Fig 3 – Correspondence confirming lane lateral building line by Overstrand Municipal Town Planner
Page 6 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
Fig 4 – survey drawing with municipal and title deed building lines shown – on each boundary, the most
restrictive building line will be applicable
Page 7 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
The site is in a heritage protection overlay zone (HPOZ), and as such it would have to be submitted to the
Overstrand Heritage and Aesthetics Committee for comment.
Page 8 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
Fig 7a – Rooi Els Environmental Management Overlay Zone map (EMOZ areas in yellow)
Fig 7b - Extract from the EMOZ map, showing the bottom boundary of the site falling within the EMOZ.
Page 9 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
Page 10 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
Page 11 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
3 BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS
Building Cost
As discussed at the initial project briefing meetings, building cost vary depending on the project size, site
conditions, material choices etc.
As an initial guideline, based on our experience of building in the Overstrand, a building budget of between
R23 000 and R28 000/m² would be required for the project.
As per the briefing meeting – the area of the house is to be between 90m² - 120m² and provision should also
be made for car parking and a swimming pool.
The building budget is exclusive of professional fees, escalation, contingency and other exclusions as set out
in the generic fee proposal sent out previously.
This preliminary budget is not a confirmed project cost, but a basis to develop the project and scope
of works further. Project cost will vary and will be confirmed through preliminary budget and/or tender
costings by a contractor/contractors. If required, the design and specification will be altered to suit
the available budget.
For example:
Page 12 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
Structural engineer
The services of a structural engineer will be required in the next stage of the design development process to
ensure the existing structure and foundations are able to support the proposed additions, together with
technical input on structural elements. The structural engineer’s information also has to be submitted with the
municipal building plan application. A fee proposal from a structural engineer will be obtained for client’s
approval.
Heritage Consultant
At this stage it is not envisaged that a Heritage Consultant will be required to deal with the heritage
processes associated with this project.
The services of a heritage consultant will be beneficial should the council query any of the proposed
interventions.
Town Planner
At this stage it is not envisaged that a Town Planner will be required to deal with any LUMS processes, and
the Architects will design the building to avoid any of the land use processes as far as possible.
Should it become evident during the design process that a departure is required in the interest of the project,
the services of a Town Planner may be beneficial.
Quantity Surveyor
At this stage it is not envisaged that a Quantity Surveyor will be required for the project.
The square meter rates allowed for the project should be sufficient to work within up to tender stage, where a
builder can price the project accurately.
Page 13 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
5 PROJECT PROGRAMME
Project Timeline:
Below is a rough possible timeline for the project for planning purposes and will be adjusted to suit once the
parameters of the project become more clear through the design process.
At this stage the allowance is 7 months for development (including municipal approvals) and 9 months for the
total construction period (6 months construction and 3 months defects liability period)
Page 14 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
6 METHODS OF CONTRACTING
For Construction:
The contract between Client and building Contractor is likely to be a choice between the JBCC
building contract or the simpler Masterbuilders building contract.
The JBCC contract is more complicated to administer but is the ‘industry standard’ and makes
provision for more complex projects.
The Masterbuilders Contract is a lot simpler and more straightforward but would only be
recommended if the project is straightforward and the Contractor on board is someone we have
worked with before.
Page 15 of 16
A r c h i t e c t s
7 NEXT STEPS
END
Page 16 of 16