Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education

POSITION : SCHOOL HEAD


MOVs/ OUTPUTS
KRA OBJECTIVES QET INDICATORS
2021-2022

Outstanding (5) Applied effective strategies in communicating the Deped vision, mission and core values to the wider school
community that ensures shared understanding and alignment od school policies and PPA's
Very Satsifactory (4) Applied effective strategies in communicating the Deped Mission and core values to the internal stakeholders
that ensures shared understanding and alignment od school policies and PPA's Main MOV:
Approved
1. Communicated the DepEd QUALITY
Satisfactory (3)
Communications Plan
vision, mission and core Applied an effective strategy in communicating the Deped vision, mission and core values to the wider school
values to the wider school community that ensures shared understanding and alignment od school policies and PPA's Supporting MOVs:
community to ensure shared ● IEC Materials
understanding and Unsatisfactory (2) Applied effective strategy/ies in communicating the Deped Mission and core values to the internal ● Communication Letter
stakeholders and is partially aligned with the school policies and PPA's
alignment of school policies, ● Narrative/ Activity Completion Report with
programs, projects and Poor (1) No acceptable evidence was shown Pictures
activities. Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented ● others, please specify and provide annotations
Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) Developed and implemented 100% aligned with institutional goals and policies
Very Satsifactory (4) Developed and implemented 85-99% aligned with institutional goals and policies
QUALITY Satisfactory (3) Developed and implemented 75-84% aligned with institutional goals and policies Main MOV:
Approved E-SIP/ AIP
Unsatisfactory (2) Developed and implemented 50-74% aligned with institutional goals and policies
2. Developed and
implemented with the Poor (1) Developed and implemented 49% and below aligned with institutional goals and policies Supporting Documents:
planning team school plans ● Completion and Monitoring report
Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented
aligned with institutional ● Accomplished Project Workplan and Budget
goals and policies Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented Matrix
● Project design
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
LEADING ● other: please specify and provide annotations
STRATEGICALLY Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) Utilized research findings that address 100 % solution of an identified school concern Main MOV: Copy of the Research Study highlighting
Very Satsifactory (4) Utilized research findings that address 80-99 % solution of the identified school concern the findings
QUALITY Satisfactory (3) Utilized research findings that address 50-79 % solution of the identified school concern Supporting documents:
3. Utilized relevant research
findings from reliable
sources in facilitating data-
driven and evidence-based
innovations improve school
performance
STRATEGICALLY

QUALITY
3. Utilized relevant research Unsatisfactory (2) Utilized research findings that address 25- 49 % solution of the identified school concern List of CIGPs/ PIAs
findings from reliable
sources in facilitating data- Poor (1) No utilization of research findings Project Design
driven and evidence-based Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented Accomplishment Report
innovations improve school
performance Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented Replicability of the program
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) Implemented 100% functional PAPs that support learner development
Very Satsifactory (4) Implemented 85-99% functional PAPs that support learner development
QUALITY Satisfactory (3) Implemented 75-84% functional PAPs that support learner development Main MOV: SIP/Annual Implementation Plan
(Highlighting the specific program)
Unsatisfactory (2) Implemented 50-74% functional PAPs that support learner development Supporting MOVs:
4. Implemented programs in Poor (1) Implemented 49% and below functional PAPs that support learner development - Program design (Project design in the SIP)
the school that support the -Project Workplan and Budget Matrix
Outstanding (5)
development of learners. 100% of the MOVs are presented - Narrative Report with the impact of
Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented implementation with attached pictures
- SBFP Implementation (Elementary Only)
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented - others, please specify and provide annotations
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved with 100% accuracy
100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but with minor areas and points of improvement
Very Satsifactory (4)

100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but major adjustment is necessary to achieve the
QUALITY Satisfactory (3) standard of performance for the objective Main MOV: School Accountability Management
Staff (Organizational Chart)
5. Managed school data and Only 75% of the required task, duties or responsibilities necessary for the fulfillment of this objective were Supporting MOVs:
information using Unsatisfactory (2)
carried out. Some of the necessary elements are missed out -Designation Orders with specific duties and
technology, including ICT, to responsibilities
ensure efficient and effective Poor (1) This objective was not performed at all -Validated NSBI
school operations. Outstanding (5) - LIS/ EBEIS
100% of the MOVs are presented
-Inventory of School Records
Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented - others (please specify and provide annotations
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) 100% of the procurement is with integrity and accuracy aligned to the approved/adjusted
SIP/AIP/SLCP/SOB/APP/WFP and liquidated as shown in the submitted MOVs
Very Satsifactory (4) 85%-99% of the procurement is with integrity and accuracy aligned to the approved/adjusted
SIP/AIP/SLCP/SOB/APP/WFP and liquidated as shown in the submitted MOVs
QUALITY Satisfactory (3) 75%-84% of the procurement is with integrity and accuracy aligned to the approved/adjusted
SIP/AIP/SLCP/SOB/APP/WFP and liquidated as shown in the submitted MOVs
Unsatisfactory (2) 50%-74% of the procurement is with integrity and accuracy aligned to the approved/adjusted
SIP/AIP/SLCP/SOB/APP/WFP and liquidated as shown in the submitted MOVs Main MOV: Approved APP, SOB, PPMP, WFP, SLCP
6. Managed finances Poor (1) 49% and below of the procurement is with integrity and accuracy aligned to the approved/adjusted Supporting MOV:
adhering to policies, SIP/AIP/SLCP/SOB/APP/WFP and liquidated as shown in the submitted MOVs -Status Report on Liquidation from the Div.
guidelines and issuances in Outstanding (5) Presented all the required MOVs
Accountant
allocation, procurement, -Minutes of Bids and Awards meeting
disbursement and Very Satsifactory (4) Presented 85-99% of the required MOVs -Transparency Board
liquidation aligned with the EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) Presented 75-84% of the required MOVs
-Liquidation Documents (MOOE/SCHOOL/ PTA/IGPs/
school plan. OTHER FUNDS
Unsatisfactory (2) Presented 50-74% of the required MOVs - others (please specify and provide annotations

MANAGING SCHOOL
OPERATIONS AND
RESOURCES
adhering to policies, -Status Report on Liquidation from the Div.
guidelines and issuances in Accountant
allocation, procurement, -Minutes of Bids and Awards meeting
disbursement and -Transparency Board
liquidation aligned with the EFFICIENCY -Liquidation Documents (MOOE/SCHOOL/ PTA/IGPs/
school plan. OTHER FUNDS
- others (please specify and provide annotations
Poor (1) Presented 49% and below of the required MOVs
Outstanding (5) Management of finances is consistently done on time
MANAGING SCHOOL
OPERATIONS AND Very Satsifactory (4) Management of finances is frequently done on time
RESOURCES
TIMELINESS Satisfactory (3) Management of finances is occasionally done on time
Unsatisfactory (2) Management of finances is seldom done on time
Poor (1) Management of finances is never done on time
100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved with 100% accuracy
Outstanding (5)

100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but with minor areas and points of improvement
Very Satsifactory (4)

QUALITY 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but major adjustment is necessary to achieve the ● Adopt a School Report
Satisfactory (3)
7. Managed school facilities standard of performance for the objective ● NSBI
and equipment in adherence Only 75% of the required task, duties or responsibilities necessary for the fulfillment of this objective were ● Records of Repair and Maintenance/ Storage
Unsatisfactory (2)
to policies, guidelines and carried out. Some of the necessary elements are missed out of Disposal
issuances on acquisition, ● utilization report
recording, utilization, repair Poor (1) ● compilation of ICS
and maintenance, storage No activities performed ● others (please specify and provide
and disposal. Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented annotations
Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved with 100% accuracy
Very Satsifactory (4) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but with minor areas and points of improvement
QUALITY Satisfactory (3) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but major adjustment is necessary to achieve the
standard of performance for the objective Main MOV
8. Managed staffing such as Only 75% of the required task, duties or responsibilities necessary for the fulfillment of this objective were
Unsatisfactory (2) SF7
teaching load distribution and carried out. Some of the necessary elements are missed out
grade level and subject area Poor (1) No acceptable evidence was shown Supporting Documents
assignment in adherence to
Outstanding (5) ● Designation Order
laws, policies, guidelines and 100% of the MOVs are presented ● Organizational Structure
issuances based on the needs Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented ● Class Program (Signed by PSDS)
of the school.
● others (please specify and provide annotations
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented

Outstanding (5) Designed and implemented data- based interventions with complete documentations to achieve higher
learning outcomes
Very Satsifactory (4) Designed and implemented data- based interventions with incomplete documentations to achieve higher Main MOV:
learning outcomes Intervention Design / Project Design
QUALITY
Satisfactory (3)
Designed data- based interventions with complete documentations to achieve higher learning outcomes Supporting Docs:
9. Utilized learning outcomes in
● QRA (Quarterly)
developing data-based Unsatisfactory (2) ● SMEA (Quarterly)
interventions to maintain Designed data- based interventions with incomplete documentations to achieve higher learning outcomes ● EMIS (Student MIS)
learner achievement and attain Poor (1) No acceptable evidence was shown ● Reports on Reading Inventories
other performance indicators.
● Performance Indicators for the last 3 school years
Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented ● accomplishment report with impact of the
Very Satsifactory (4) intervention
85-99% of the MOVs are presented others (please specify and provide annotations
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented

FOCUSING ON
● Reports on Reading Inventories
other performance indicators.
● Performance Indicators for the last 3 school years
● accomplishment report with impact of the
intervention
others (please specify and provide annotations
EFFICIENCY

Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented


Outstanding (5) Provided technical assistance to teachers to ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes that
reflects adjustments and modification in the teaching practice
Very Satsifactory (4) Provided technical assistance to teachers to ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes that
reflect integration of well connected teaching practices
QUALITY
FOCUSING ON 10. Provided technical Satisfactory (3) Provided technical assistance to teachers to ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes that
TEACHING AND assistance to teachers in using reflect consistent application of relevant teaching practices ● COT with observation notes
LEARNING learning assessment tools, ● Others (please specify and provide annotations
strategies and results Unsatisfactory (2) Provided technical assistance to teachers to ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes that ● PMCF
consistent with curriculum reflect application of relevant teaching practice ● SLAC / Team Building Reports
requirements to ensure Poor (1) No acceptable evidence was shown ● School Head’s Customized Monitoring Tool
accountability in achieving ● others (please specify and provide annotations
Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented
higher learning outcomes.
Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved with 100% accuracy ● Proof/ Documents Limited F2f classes
Very Satsifactory (4) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but with minor areas and points of improvement SSAT, School Safety Seal
QUALITY Satisfactory (3) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but major adjustment is necessary to achieve the ● Accomplished CFSS Tool
standard of performance for the objective
Unsatisfactory (2) Only 75% of the required task, duties or responsibilities necessary for the fulfillment of this objective were ● CPP
carried out. Some of the necessary elements are missed out
11. Managed a learner-friendly, Poor (1) No acceptable evidence was shown ● WINs
inclusive and healthy learning
environment. Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented ●NGP/GPP
Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented ●DRR Reports
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented ●SBFP Reports (Elementary only)
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented ●Others (please specify and provide annotations)
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) Attained 100% of the targetted activities in the development plan
Very Satsifactory (4) Attained 85-99% of the targetted activities in the development plan
QUALITY Satisfactory (3) Attained 75-84% of the targetted activities in the development plan
Main MOVs
12. Set personal and Unsatisfactory (2) Attained 50-74% of the targetted activities in the development plan School Head Development Plan
professional development
Poor (1) No acceptable evidence was shown
goals based on self-assessment
Supporting Docs
aligned with the Philippine Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented ● RMPS- Assessment Tool
Professional Standards for
● OPCR of the previous year
School Heads. Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented ● others (please specify and provide annotations
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) Implemented 100% of the professional development initiatives that enhance strengths and address
DEVELOPING SELF performance gaps among school personnel
AND OTHERS
Very Satsifactory (4) Implemented 85-99% of the professional development initiatives that enhance strengths and address Main MOV: Summary of Individual
performance gaps among school personnel ● Performance and
QUALITY Implemented 75-84% of the professional development initiatives that enhance strengths and address Commitment Review Form-
Satisfactory (3) Development Plan (IPCRFDP)
performance gaps among school personnel
of school personnel and SPPD
13. Implemented professional Implemented 50-74% of the professional development initiatives that enhance strengths and address
Unsatisfactory (2)
development initiatives to performance gaps among school personnel Supporting MOV:
enhance strengths and address ● Any document aligned
performance gaps among with the IPCRF-DP
school personnel. summary such as
● Professional development planned activities conducted ●
(Coaching/Mentoring, LAC)
● Implementation Report
● PMCF
● OTHERS (Please specify and provide annotations)
AND OTHERS
Main MOV: Summary of Individual
● Performance and
QUALITY
Commitment Review Form-
Development Plan (IPCRFDP)
of school personnel and SPPD
13. Implemented professional
development initiatives to Supporting MOV:
enhance strengths and address ● Any document aligned
performance gaps among Poor (1) Implemented 49% and below of the professional development initiatives that enhance strengths and address with the IPCRF-DP
school personnel. performance gaps among school personnel summary such as
● Professional development planned activities conducted ●
Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented (Coaching/Mentoring, LAC)
Very Satsifactory (4)
● Implementation Report
85-99% of the MOVs are presented ● PMCF
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) ● OTHERS (Please specify and provide annotations)
75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
Outstanding (5) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved with 100% accuracy
Very Satsifactory (4) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but with minor areas and points of improvement
QUALITY Satisfactory (3) 100% of the task, duties and responsibilities were achieved but major adjustment is necessary to achieve the
14. Managed school standard of performance for the objective Main MOV
organizations, such as learner Unsatisfactory (2) Only 75% of the required task, duties or responsibilities necessary for the fulfillment of this objective were List of School Recognized Organization
organizations, faculty clubs and carried out. Some of the necessary elements are missed out
Poor (1) No acceptable evidence was shown
parent- teacher associations, Supporting Docs
by applying relevant policies Outstanding (5) ● Organizational chart
and guidelines to support the 100% of the MOVs are presented ● Accomplishment report
attainment of institutional Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented ● others (please specify and provide annotations
goals.
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented
BUILDING Outstanding (5)
CONNECTIONS Sustained school community partnerships to address concerns on the development of the learners
Very Satsifactory (4) Discussed with the learners, parents, guardians and other stakeholders plans for the development of the
learners
QUALITY Communicated with the learners, parents, guardians plans for the development of the learners through a
15. Initiated partnerships with Satisfactory (3) Agenda and minutes of meetings
the community, such as communication letter o Documentation of the activities like SOSA, General
parents, alumni, authorities, Unsatisfactory (2) Implemented activities for the development of the learners without communicating and consulting the Assembly, BADAC meetings, Barangay Sessions, BCPC
industries and other learners, parents, guardians and other stakeholders meetings, Stakeholders Summit, etc. undertaken for the
stakeholders, to strengthen Poor (1)
purpose (activity design, narrative report, pictorials,
support for learner No acceptable evidence was shown evaluation sheet, MOU, MOA, Resolution, Deed of
development, as well as school Outstanding (5) 100% of the MOVs are presented Donation, etc.)
and community improvement. o others (please specify and provide annotations
Very Satsifactory (4) 85-99% of the MOVs are presented
EFFICIENCY Satisfactory (3) 75-84% of the MOVs are presented
Unsatisfactory (2) 50-74% of the MOVs are presented
Poor (1) 49% and below of the MOVs are presented

You might also like