Lampiran 11

OUTPUT SPSS

A. OUTPUT SPSS UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS

1. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER PENGETAHUAN ANEMIA

Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Tot
an B1 an B2 an B3 an B4 an B5 an B6 an B7 an B8 an B9 an B10 an B11 an B12 an B13 an B14 an B15 al
Sko
rB
Pearson 1 .246 .227 .158 .644** .128 .091 -.058 .034 -.102 .288 .142 .142 .205 .193 .516
Pertanya Correlation **

an B1 Sig. (2-tailed) .183 .219 .397 .000 .491 .627 .756 .855 .584 .116 .445 .445 .267 .298 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .246 1 .132 .395* .246 .169 .377* .161 .010 .246 .398* .161 .338 -.114 .278 .634
Pertanya Correlation **

an B2 Sig. (2-tailed) .183 .479 .028 .183 .364 .036 .388 .957 .183 .026 .388 .063 .540 .130 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .227 .132 1 .007 -.055 .398* .231 -.093 .208 -.055 .108 -.093 -.093 .349 .525** .413
Pertanya Correlation *

an B3 Sig. (2-tailed) .219 .479 .970 .769 .027 .212 .619 .262 .769 .562 .619 .619 .054 .002 .021
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .158 .395* .007 1 .084 -.019 .239 .343 .210 .084 .288 .142 .343 .205 .193 .569
Pertanya Correlation **

an B4 Sig. (2-tailed) .397 .028 .970 .652 .919 .195 .059 .256 .652 .116 .445 .059 .267 .298 .001
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .644** .246 -.055 .084 1 .148 -.048 .229 -.069 .173 .114 .451* .451* -.116 .160 .495
Pertanya Correlation **

an B5 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .183 .769 .652 .428 .799 .215 .711 .351 .543 .011 .011 .533 .389 .005
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .128 .169 .398* -.019 .148 1 .289 .249 .214 -.016 .107 -.102 .074 .100 .338 .483
Pertanya Correlation **

an B6 Sig. (2-tailed) .491 .364 .027 .919 .428 .115 .177 .247 .933 .567 .585 .694 .591 .063 .006
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .091 .377* .231 .239 -.048 .289 1 .045 .180 .281 .455* .045 .045 -.088 .141 .538
Pertanya Correlation **

an B7 Sig. (2-tailed) .627 .036 .212 .195 .799 .115 .808 .332 .126 .010 .808 .808 .637 .448 .002
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
 Pearson -.058 .161 -.093 .343 .229 .249 .045 1 .392* .007 .012 .046 .285 -.398* .144 .332
Pertanya Correlation
an B8 Sig. (2-tailed) .756 .388 .619 .059 .215 .177 .808 .029 .970 .951 .805 .121 .027 .441 .068
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .034 .010 .208 .210 -.069 .214 .180 .392* 1 -.069 -.112 -.237 .183 .130 .177 .336
Pertanya Correlation
an B9 Sig. (2-tailed) .855 .957 .262 .256 .711 .247 .332 .029 .711 .547 .200 .325 .486 .341 .064
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson -.102 .246 -.055 .084 .173 -.016 .281 .007 -.069 1 -.222 .451* .229 -.116 -.116 .258
Pertanya Correlation
an B10 Sig. (2-tailed) .584 .183 .769 .652 .351 .933 .126 .970 .711 .231 .011 .215 .533 .535 .160
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .288 .398* .108 .288 .114 .107 .455* .012 -.112 -.222 1 -.168 .192 -.056 .260 .443
Pertanya Correlation *

an B11 Sig. (2-tailed) .116 .026 .562 .116 .543 .567 .010 .951 .547 .231 .365 .302 .766 .158 .012
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .142 .161 -.093 .142 .451* -.102 .045 .046 -.237 .451* -.168 1 .285 -.222 -.153 .237
Pertanya Correlation
an B12 Sig. (2-tailed) .445 .388 .619 .445 .011 .585 .808 .805 .200 .011 .365 .121 .231 .411 .200
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .142 .338 -.093 .343 .451* .074 .045 .285 .183 .229 .192 .285 1 .131 .144 .554
Pertanya Correlation **

an B13 Sig. (2-tailed) .445 .063 .619 .059 .011 .694 .808 .121 .325 .215 .302 .121 .483 .441 .001
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .205 -.114 .349 .205 -.116 .100 -.088 -.398* .130 -.116 -.056 -.222 .131 1 .297 .213
Pertanya Correlation
an B14 Sig. (2-tailed) .267 .540 .054 .267 .533 .591 .637 .027 .486 .533 .766 .231 .483 .105 .250
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .193 .278 .525** .193 .160 .338 .141 .144 .177 -.116 .260 -.153 .144 .297 1 .519
Pertanya Correlation **

an B15 Sig. (2-tailed) .298 .130 .002 .298 .389 .063 .448 .441 .341 .535 .158 .411 .441 .105 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .516** .634** .413* .569** .495** .483** .538** .332 .336 .258 .443* .237 .554** .213 .519** 1
Total Correlation
Skor B Sig. (2-tailed) .003 .000 .021 .001 .005 .006 .002 .068 .064 .160 .012 .200 .001 .250 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
Based on
Standardized
Items

.726 .730 10
 Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean Scale Corrected Squared Multiple Cronbach's Alpha

if Item Variance if Item-Total Correlation if Item Deleted
Deleted Item Deleted Correlation
Pertanyaan B1 4.74 4.531 .420 .580 .699
Pertanyaan B2 4.90 4.157 .546 .352 .675
Pertanyaan B3 5.35 4.970 .289 .464 .718
Pertanyaan B4 4.74 4.665 .345 .285 .711
Pertanyaan B5 4.68 4.759 .345 .632 .711
Pertanyaan B6 5.00 4.600 .306 .268 .720
Pertanyaan B7 5.03 4.432 .393 .359 .704
Pertanyaan B11 4.87 4.316 .468 .364 .690
Pertanyaan B13 4.65 4.837 .333 .385 .712
Pertanyaan B15 5.39 4.845 .445 .406 .702

2. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER DUKUNGAN

TEMAN SEBAYA

Correlations
Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Total
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Skor C
Pearson 1 .303 .544** .639** -.078 .635**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C1 Sig. (2-tailed) .098 .002 .000 .677 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .303 1 .501** .175 .003 .555**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C2 Sig. (2-tailed) .098 .004 .346 .987 .001
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .544** .501** 1 .629** .273 .890**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C3 Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .004 .000 .138 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .639** .175 .629** 1 .263 .773**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C4 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .346 .000 .153 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson -.078 .003 .273 .263 1 .512**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C5 Sig. (2-tailed) .677 .987 .138 .153 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .635** .555** .890** .773** .512** 1
Total Skor Correlation
C Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .001 .000 .000 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
Based on
Standardized
Items
.686 .707 5
 Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Item- Squared Cronbach's
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Correlation Correlation Deleted
Pertanyaan C1 6.00 3.200 .482 .529 .635
Pertanyaan C2 5.65 3.237 .347 .306 .672
Pertanyaan C3 5.45 1.856 .735 .589 .465
Pertanyaan C4 5.97 2.766 .634 .584 .566
Pertanyaan C5 5.84 3.140 .182 .226 .763

3. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER DUKUNGAN

GURU

Correlations
Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Total
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Skor D
Pearson 1 .222 .604** .395* -.029 .665**
Pertanyaan Correlation
D1 Sig. (2-tailed) .230 .000 .028 .877 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .222 1 .448* .306 .187 .627**
Pertanyaan Correlation
D2 Sig. (2-tailed) .230 .012 .094 .314 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .604** .448* 1 .700** .142 .860**
Pertanyaan Correlation
D3 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .012 .000 .445 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .395* .306 .700** 1 .148 .775**
Pertanyaan Correlation
D4 Sig. (2-tailed) .028 .094 .000 .426 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson -.029 .187 .142 .148 1 .425*
Pertanyaan Correlation
D5 Sig. (2-tailed) .877 .314 .445 .426 .017
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .665** .627** .860** .775** .425* 1
Total Skor Correlation
D Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .017
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

Based on
Standardized
Items

.690 .694 5
 Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Item- Squared Cronbach's
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Correlation Correlation Deleted
Pertanyaan D1 9.19 3.228 .422 .381 .651
Pertanyaan D2 9.26 3.465 .407 .218 .655
Pertanyaan D3 9.19 2.895 .757 .661 .511
Pertanyaan D4 9.35 2.837 .574 .494 .577
Pertanyaan D5 10.61 3.978 .143 .062 .757

4. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER DUKUNGAN

ORANG TUA
Correlations
Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Tota
an E1 an E2 an E3 an E4 an E5 an E6 an E7 l
Skor
E
Pearson 1 .458** .270 .151 -.004 .409* .513** .637*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E1 Sig. (2- .010 .142 .418 .984 .022 .003 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .458** 1 .343 .373* .338 .210 .256 .520*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E2 Sig. (2- .010 .059 .039 .063 .257 .164 .003
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .270 .343 1 .737** .323 .659** .638** .808*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E3 Sig. (2- .142 .059 .000 .076 .000 .000 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .151 .373* .737** 1 .712** .424* .392* .721*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E4 Sig. (2- .418 .039 .000 .000 .017 .029 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson -.004 .338 .323 .712** 1 .228 .059 .465*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E5 Sig. (2- .984 .063 .076 .000 .217 .754 .008
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .409* .210 .659** .424* .228 1 .769** .821*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E6 Sig. (2- .022 .257 .000 .017 .217 .000 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pertanya Pearson .513** .256 .638** .392* .059 .769** 1 .811*
an E7 Correlati *

on
Sig. (2- .003 .164 .000 .029 .754 .000 .000
tailed)
 N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .637** .520** .808** .721** .465** .821** .811** 1
Correlati
Total on
Skor E Sig. (2- .000 .003 .000 .000 .008 .000 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

Based on
Standardized
Items

.796 .819 7

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Item- Squared Cronbach's
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Correlation Correlation Deleted
Pertanyaan E1 7.16 3.873 .405 .426 .812
Pertanyaan E2 7.42 5.052 .461 .369 .796
Pertanyaan E3 7.29 3.946 .722 .763 .736
Pertanyaan E4 7.26 4.265 .621 .808 .758
Pertanyaan E5 7.23 4.714 .304 .665 .805
Pertanyaan E6 7.13 3.516 .703 .686 .731
Pertanyaan E7 7.23 3.647 .698 .695 .733

5. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER DUKUNGAN

TENAGA KESEHATAN
Correlations
Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Total
an F1 an F2 an F3 an F4 an F5 an F6 an F7 Skor
F
Pearson 1 .582** .398* .358* .182 .101 .317 .651*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F1 Sig. (2- .001 .027 .048 .326 .590 .082 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .582** 1 .637** .506** .193 .177 .095 .728*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F2 Sig. (2- .001 .000 .004 .298 .340 .613 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .398* .637** 1 .598** .268 .142 .308 .746*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F3 Sig. (2- .027 .000 .000 .145 .447 .092 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
 Pearson .358* .506** .598** 1 .211 .237 .051 .677*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F4 Sig. (2- .048 .004 .000 .254 .199 .785 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .182 .193 .268 .211 1 .470** .314 .632*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F5 Sig. (2- .326 .298 .145 .254 .008 .085 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .101 .177 .142 .237 .470** 1 .054 .527*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F6 Sig. (2- .590 .340 .447 .199 .008 .773 .002
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .317 .095 .308 .051 .314 .054 1 .433*
Correlati
Pertanya on
an F7 Sig. (2- .082 .613 .092 .785 .085 .773 .015
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .651** .728** .746** .677** .632** .527** .433* 1
Correlati
Total on
Skor F Sig. (2- .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .002 .015
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

Based on
Standardized
Items

.744 .746 7

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Item- Squared Cronbach's
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Correlation Correlation Deleted
Pertanyaan F1 13.03 7.766 .494 .424 .706
Pertanyaan F2 12.90 7.224 .581 .579 .683
Pertanyaan F3 12.68 7.426 .625 .580 .677
Pertanyaan F4 12.61 7.578 .521 .430 .699
Pertanyaan F5 13.26 7.398 .416 .319 .728
Pertanyaan F6 13.00 8.200 .320 .257 .745
Pertanyaan F7 13.29 9.013 .286 .291 .745
6. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER KEPATUHAN
KONSUMSI TTD
Correlations
Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Total Skor
G1 G2 G3 G4 G
Pearson 1 .805** .360* .563** .834**
Pertanyaan Correlation
G1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .047 .001 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .805** 1 .561** .377* .838**
Pertanyaan Correlation
G2 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .001 .036 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .360* .561** 1 .678** .796**
Pertanyaan Correlation
G3 Sig. (2-tailed) .047 .001 .000 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .563** .377* .678** 1 .802**
Pertanyaan Correlation
G4 Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .036 .000 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .834** .838** .796** .802** 1
Correlation
Total Skor G .000 .000 .000 .000
Sig. (2-tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Cronbach's N of Items

Alpha Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items

.834 .834 4
B. OUTPUT SPSS 374 SAMPLE (WILAYAH KABUPATEN PELALAWAN)
1. ANALISIS UNIVARIAT
kelas responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
10 156 41.7 41.7 41.7
11 180 48.1 48.1 89.8
Valid 12 38 10.2 10.2 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

umur responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
15 40 10.7 10.7 10.7
16 145 38.8 38.8 49.5
17 129 34.5 34.5 84.0
Valid 18 50 13.4 13.4 97.3
19 10 2.7 2.7 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

tempat tinggal responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
ORANG TUA 310 82.9 82.9 82.9
SELAIN ORTU 15 4.0 4.0 86.9
Valid PONPES 49 13.1 13.1 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan anemia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG (SKOR <60) 203 54.3 54.3 54.3
CUKUP (SKOR 60-80) 164 43.9 43.9 98.1
Valid BAIK (SKOR > 80) 7 1.9 1.9 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

dukungan guru
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 282 75.4 75.4 75.4
Valid BAIK 92 24.6 24.6 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

dukungan orang tua

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 300 80.2 80.2 80.2
Valid BAIK 74 19.8 19.8 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0
 kepatuhan konsumsi TTD
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
TIDAK PATUH 329 88.0 88.0 88.0
Valid PATUH 45 12.0 12.0 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

2. ANALISIS BIVARIAT

pengetahuan anemia * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 196 7 203
KURANG (SKOR Expected Count 178.6 24.4 203.0
<60) % within pengetahuan 96.6% 3.4% 100.0%
anemia
Count 131 33 164
pengetahuan CUKUP (SKOR Expected Count 144.3 19.7 164.0
anemia 60-80) % within pengetahuan 79.9% 20.1% 100.0%
anemia
Count 2 5 7
BAIK (SKOR > Expected Count 6.2 .8 7.0
80) % within pengetahuan 28.6% 71.4% 100.0%
anemia
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within pengetahuan 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
anemia

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 47.604a 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 40.979 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 40.913 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .84.
DUMMY VARIABEL PENGETAHUAN ANEMIA CARA REGRESI
LOGISTIK SEDERHANA
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 30.465 2 .000
Step pengetahuan(1) 1.954 .431 20.529 1 .000 7.053 3.030 16.421
1a pengetahuan(2) 4.248 .921 21.286 1 .000 70.000 11.515 425.524
Constant -3.332 .385 75.045 1 .000 .036
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan.
 dukungan teman sebaya * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 296 8 304
KURANG Expected Count 267.4 36.6 304.0
BAIK % within dukungan teman 97.4% 2.6% 100.0%
dukungan teman sebaya
sebaya Count 33 37 70
Expected Count 61.6 8.4 70.0
BAIK
% within dukungan teman 47.1% 52.9% 100.0%
sebaya
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan teman 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
sebaya

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 135.608a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 130.904 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 104.137 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 135.245 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.42.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan teman sebaya (KURANG 41.485 17.827 96.540
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 2.065 1.611 2.649
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .050 .024 .102
N of Valid Cases 374
 Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for .014 .002 .087

baiikdankurang (0 / 1)
For cohort kepatuhan .296 .092 .955
konsumsi TTD = TIDAK
PATUH
For cohort kepatuhan 20.714 8.716 49.229
konsumsi TTD = PATUH
N of Valid Cases 210

dukungan guru * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 275 7 282
KURANG Expected Count 248.1 33.9 282.0
BAIK % within dukungan 97.5% 2.5% 100.0%
guru
dukungan guru
Count 54 38 92
Expected Count 80.9 11.1 92.0
BAIK
% within dukungan 58.7% 41.3% 100.0%
guru
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
guru

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 98.777a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 95.144 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 84.627 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 98.513 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan guru (KURANG BAIK / BAIK) 27.646 11.730 65.155
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.661 1.398 1.974
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .060 .028 .130
N of Valid Cases 374

dukungan guru * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 275 7 282
KURANG Expected Count 248.1 33.9 282.0
BAIK % within dukungan 97.5% 2.5% 100.0%
guru
dukungan guru
Count 54 38 92
Expected Count 80.9 11.1 92.0
BAIK
% within dukungan 58.7% 41.3% 100.0%
guru
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
guru

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 98.777a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 95.144 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 84.627 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 98.513 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for dukungan guru (KURANG BAIK / BAIK) 27.646 11.730 65.155
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.661 1.398 1.974
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .060 .028 .130
N of Valid Cases 374
 dukungan orang tua * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 285 15 300
KURANG Expected Count 263.9 36.1 300.0
BAIK % within dukungan orang 95.0% 5.0% 100.0%
dukungan orang tua
tua Count 44 30 74
Expected Count 65.1 8.9 74.0
BAIK
% within dukungan orang 59.5% 40.5% 100.0%
tua
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan orang 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
tua

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 70.838a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 67.520 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 55.907 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 70.648 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.90.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan orang tua (KURANG BAIK / 12.955 6.456 25.993
BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK 1.598 1.321 1.932
PATUH
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .123 .070 .217
N of Valid Cases 374
 dukungan tenaga kesehatan * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 232 5 237
KURANG Expected Count 208.5 28.5 237.0
BAIK % within dukungan tenaga 97.9% 2.1% 100.0%
dukungan tenaga kesehatan
kesehatan Count 97 40 137
Expected Count 120.5 16.5 137.0
BAIK
% within dukungan tenaga 70.8% 29.2% 100.0%
kesehatan
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan tenaga 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
kesehatan

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 60.182a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 57.650 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 60.987 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 60.021 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.48.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan tenaga kesehatan (KURANG 19.134 7.331 49.943
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.383 1.240 1.542
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .072 .029 .179
N of Valid Cases 374

3. ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT
a. Seleksi Bivariat
pengetahuan anemia

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 40.979 2 .000

Step 1 Block 40.979 2 .000

Model 40.979 2 .000

dukungan teman sebaya

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 104.137 1 .000

Step 1 Block 104.137 1 .000

Model 104.137 1 .000

dukungan guru

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 84.627 1 .000

Step 1 Block 84.627 1 .000

Model 84.627 1 .000

dukungan orang tua

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 55.907 1 .000

Step 1 Block 55.907 1 .000

Model 55.907 1 .000

dukungan tenaga kesehatan
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 60.987 1 .000

Step 1 Block 60.987 1 .000

Model 60.987 1 .000

 Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 152.717 6 .000

Step 1 Block 152.717 6 .000

Model 152.717 6 .000

tahap pertama
Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C

Lower

pengetahuan 9.663 2 .008

pengetahuan(1) 1.282 .546 5.508 1 .019 3.603 1.2

pengetahuan(2) 2.967 1.085 7.484 1 .006 19.441 2.3

D.Teman 2.418 .535 20.390 1 .000 11.219 3.9

Step 1a
D.Guru 1.131 .577 3.841 1 .050 3.100 1.0

D.Ortu 1.367 .489 7.808 1 .005 3.922 1.5

D.Nakes 1.355 .589 5.291 1 .021 3.878 1.2

Constant -12.176 1.498 66.082 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Guru, D.Ortu, D.Nakes.

C. OUTPUT SPSS 187 SAMPLE (WILAYAH PUSKESMAS CAKUPAN
TERTINGGI/SEKIJANG)
1. ANALISIS UNIVARIAT
kelas responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
10 72 38.5 38.5 38.5
11 113 60.4 60.4 98.9
Valid 12 2 1.1 1.1 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

umur responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent
17 9.1 9.1 9.1
15

75 40.1 40.1 49.2

16

80 42.8 42.8 92.0

17
Valid
12 6.4 6.4 98.4
18

3 1.6 1.6 100.0

19

187 100.0 100.0

Total

tempat tinggal responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
ORANG TUA 138 73.8 73.8 73.8
SELAIN ORTU 9 4.8 4.8 78.6
Valid PONPES 40 21.4 21.4 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0
pengetahuan anemia

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent
KURANG (SKOR 100 53.5 53.5 53.5
<60)
CUKUP (SKOR 60- 84 44.9 44.9 98.4
80)
Valid
3 1.6 1.6 100.0
BAIK (SKOR > 80)

187 100.0 100.0

Total

dukungan teman sebaya

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 142 75.9 75.9 75.9
Valid BAIK 45 24.1 24.1 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan guru
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 130 69.5 69.5 69.5
Valid BAIK 57 30.5 30.5 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan orang tua

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 145 77.5 77.5 77.5
Valid BAIK 42 22.5 22.5 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan tenaga kesehatan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 108 57.8 57.8 57.8
Valid BAIK 79 42.2 42.2 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
TIDAK PATUH 152 81.3 81.3 81.3
Valid PATUH 35 18.7 18.7 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

2. ANALISIS BIVARIAT
pengetahuan anemia * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 95 5 100
KURANG (SKOR Expected Count 81.3 18.7 100.0
<60) % within pengetahuan 95.0% 5.0% 100.0%
anemia
Count 56 28 84
pengetahuan CUKUP (SKOR Expected Count 68.3 15.7 84.0
anemia 60-80) % within pengetahuan 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
anemia
Count 1 2 3
BAIK (SKOR > Expected Count 2.4 .6 3.0
80) % within pengetahuan 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
anemia
 Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within pengetahuan 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
anemia

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 28.697a 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 29.844 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 28.502 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .56.
NILAI POR PENGETAHUAN ANEMIA >< KEPATUHAN KONSUMSI
TTD (DUMMY VARIABEL MENGGUNAKAN CARA REGRESI
LOGISTIK SEDERHANA)

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 21.393 2 .000
Step pengetahuan(1) 2.251 .514 19.191 1 .000 9.500 3.470 26.011
1a pengetahuan(2) 3.638 1.308 7.736 1 .005 38.000 2.928 493.225
Constant -2.944 .459 41.181 1 .000 .053
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan.

dukungan teman sebaya * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 138 4 142
KURANG Expected Count 115.4 26.6 142.0
BAIK % within dukungan teman 97.2% 2.8% 100.0%
dukungan teman sebaya
sebaya Count 14 31 45
Expected Count 36.6 8.4 45.0
BAIK
% within dukungan teman 31.1% 68.9% 100.0%
sebaya
Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan teman 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
sebaya

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 98.054a 1 .000
Continuity Correction b 93.759 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 88.059 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 97.530 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.42.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan teman sebaya (KURANG 76.393 23.533 247.991
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 3.124 2.021 4.829
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .041 .015 .110
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan guru * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 128 2 130
KURANG Expected Count 105.7 24.3 130.0
BAIK % within dukungan 98.5% 1.5% 100.0%
guru
dukungan guru
Count 24 33 57
Expected Count 46.3 10.7 57.0
BAIK
% within dukungan 42.1% 57.9% 100.0%
guru
Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
guru

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 82.724a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 79.061 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 82.042 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 82.282 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
 Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan guru (KURANG BAIK / BAIK) 88.000 19.786 391.396
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 2.338 1.723 3.173
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .027 .007 .107
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan orang tua * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 136 9 145
KURANG Expected Count 117.9 27.1 145.0
BAIK % within dukungan orang 93.8% 6.2% 100.0%
dukungan orang tua
tua Count 16 26 42
Expected Count 34.1 7.9 42.0
BAIK
% within dukungan orang 38.1% 61.9% 100.0%
tua
Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan orang 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
tua

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 66.409a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 62.798 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 57.020 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 66.053 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.86.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan orang tua (KURANG BAIK / 24.556 9.804 61.500
BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK 2.462 1.671 3.628
PATUH
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .100 .051 .197
N of Valid Cases 187
 dukungan tenaga kesehatan * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 107 1 108
KURANG Expected Count 87.8 20.2 108.0
BAIK % within dukungan tenaga 99.1% 0.9% 100.0%
dukungan tenaga kesehatan
kesehatan Count 45 34 79
Expected Count 64.2 14.8 79.0
BAIK
% within dukungan tenaga 57.0% 43.0% 100.0%
kesehatan
Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan tenaga 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
kesehatan

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 53.186a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 50.453 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 60.965 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 52.901 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan tenaga kesehatan (KURANG 80.844 10.737 608.724
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.739 1.435 2.109
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .022 .003 .154
N of Valid Cases 187
D. OUTPUT SPSS 187 SAMPLE (WILAYAH PUSKESMAS CAKUPAN
TERENDAH/LANGGAM)
kelas responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
10 84 44.9 44.9 44.9
11 67 35.8 35.8 80.7
Valid 12 36 19.3 19.3 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

umur responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
15 23 12.3 12.3 12.3
16 70 37.4 37.4 49.7
17 49 26.2 26.2 75.9
Valid 18 38 20.3 20.3 96.3
19 7 3.7 3.7 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

tempat tinggal responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
ORANG TUA 172 92.0 92.0 92.0
SELAIN ORTU 6 3.2 3.2 95.2
Valid PONPES 9 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan anemia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid KURANG (SKOR <60) 103 55.1 55.1 55.1
 CUKUP (SKOR 60-80) 80 42.8 42.8 97.9
BAIK (SKOR > 80) 4 2.1 2.1 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan teman sebaya

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 162 86.6 86.6 86.6
Valid BAIK 25 13.4 13.4 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan guru
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 152 81.3 81.3 81.3
Valid BAIK 35 18.7 18.7 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan orang tua

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 155 82.9 82.9 82.9
Valid BAIK 32 17.1 17.1 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan tenaga kesehatan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 108 57.8 57.8 57.8
Valid BAIK 79 42.2 42.2 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
TIDAK PATUH 177 94.7 94.7 94.7
Valid PATUH 10 5.3 5.3 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

2. ANALISIS BIVARIAT
pengetahuan anemia * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
pengetahuan Count 101 2 103
anemia KURANG (SKOR Expected Count 97.5 5.5 103.0
<60) % within pengetahuan 98.1% 1.9% 100.0%
anemia
CUKUP (SKOR Count 75 5 80
60-80) Expected Count 75.7 4.3 80.0
 % within pengetahuan 93.8% 6.3% 100.0%
anemia
Count 1 3 4
BAIK (SKOR > Expected Count 3.8 .2 4.0
80) % within pengetahuan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%
anemia
Count 177 10 187
Expected Count 177.0 10.0 187.0
Total
% within pengetahuan 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
anemia

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 40.828a 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 16.393 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 14.261 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .21.
NILAI OR PENGETAHUAN ANEMIA >< KEPATUHAN KONSUMSI
TTD (DUMMY VARIABEL MENGGUNAKAN CARA REGRESI
LOGISTIK SEDERHANA)
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 13.728 2 .001
Step pengetahuan(1) 1.214 .850 2.038 1 .153 3.367 .636 17.827
1a pengetahuan(2) 5.021 1.358 13.675 1 .000 151.500 10.587 2167.968
Constant -3.922 .714 30.166 1 .000 .020
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan.

dukungan teman sebaya * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
dukungan teman 158 4 162
sebaya Count

KURANG 153.3 8.7 162.0

Expected Count
BAIK
% within dukungan teman 97.5% 2.5% 100.0%
sebaya
BAIK 19 6 25
Count

Expected Count 23.7 1.3 25.0

 % within dukungan teman 76.0% 24.0% 100.0%
sebaya
177 10 187
Count

177.0 10.0 187.0

Total Expected Count

% within dukungan teman 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%

sebaya

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 19.836a 1 .000

Continuity Correction b
15.810 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 12.961 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 19.730 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 187

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan teman sebaya (KURANG 12.474 3.228 48.198
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.283 1.028 1.602
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .103 .031 .339
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan guru * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
dukungan guru Count 147 5 152
KURANG Expected Count 143.9 8.1 152.0
BAIK % within dukungan 96.7% 3.3% 100.0%
guru
BAIK Count 30 5 35
 Expected Count 33.1 1.9 35.0
% within dukungan 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%
guru
Count 177 10 187
Expected Count 177.0 10.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
guru

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.796a 1 .009
Continuity Correctionb 4.797 1 .029
Likelihood Ratio 5.340 1 .021
Fisher's Exact Test .022 .022
Linear-by-Linear 6.760 1 .009
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.87.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan guru (KURANG BAIK / BAIK) 4.900 1.335 17.985
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.128 .982 1.296
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .230 .070 .752
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan orang tua * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 149 6 155
KURANG Expected Count 146.7 8.3 155.0
BAIK % within dukungan orang 96.1% 3.9% 100.0%
dukungan orang tua
tua Count 28 4 32
Expected Count 30.3 1.7 32.0
BAIK
% within dukungan orang 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
tua
Count 177 10 187
Expected Count 177.0 10.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan orang 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
tua

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.902a 1 .048
Continuity Correction b 2.383 1 .123
Likelihood Ratio 3.128 1 .077
Fisher's Exact Test .070 .070
Linear-by-Linear 3.881 1 .049
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan orang tua (KURANG 3.548 .940 13.387
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK 1.099 .960 1.257
PATUH
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .310 .093 1.035
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan tenaga kesehatan * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 125 4 129
KURANG Expected Count 122.1 6.9 129.0
BAIK % within dukungan tenaga 96.9% 3.1% 100.0%
dukungan tenaga kesehatan
kesehatan Count 52 6 58
Expected Count 54.9 3.1 58.0
BAIK
% within dukungan tenaga 89.7% 10.3% 100.0%
kesehatan
Count 177 10 187
Expected Count 177.0 10.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan tenaga 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
kesehatan

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.148a 1 .042
Continuity Correctionb 2.840 1 .092
Likelihood Ratio 3.782 1 .052
Fisher's Exact Test .072 .050
Linear-by-Linear 4.126 1 .042
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.10.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan tenaga kesehatan (KURANG 3.606 .977 13.308
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.081 .985 1.186
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .300 .088 1.022
N of Valid Cases 187

umur responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Valid 15 40 10.7 10.7 10.7

16 145 38.8 38.8 49.5

17 129 34.5 34.5 84.0

18 50 13.4 13.4 97.3

19 10 2.7 2.7 100.0

 Total 374 100.0 100.0

tempat tinggal responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

ORANG TUA 310 82.9 82.9 82.9

SELAIN ORTU 15 4.0 4.0 86.9

Valid
PONPES 49 13.1 13.1 100.0

Total 374 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan anemia

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

KURANG (SKOR <60) 185 49.5 49.5 49.5

CUKUP (SKOR 60-80) 167 44.7 44.7 94.1

Valid
BAIK (SKOR > 80) 22 5.9 5.9 100.0

Total 374 100.0 100.0

dukungan teman sebaya

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Valid KURANG BAIK 291 77.8 77.8 77.8

 BAIK 83 22.2 22.2 100.0

Total 374 100.0 100.0

dukungan guru

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

KURANG BAIK 182 48.7 48.7 48.7

Valid BAIK 192 51.3 51.3 100.0

Total 374 100.0 100.0

dukungan orang tua

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

KURANG BAIK 296 79.1 79.1 79.1

Valid BAIK 78 20.9 20.9 100.0

Total 374 100.0 100.0

dukungan tenaga kesehatan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Valid KURANG BAIK 164 43.9 43.9 43.9

BAIK 210 56.1 56.1 100.0

 Total 374 100.0 100.0

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

TIDAK PATUH 332 88.8 88.8 88.8

Valid PATUH 42 11.2 11.2 100.0

Total 374 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan anemia * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

pengetahuan anemia Count 179 6

Expected Count 164.2 20.8

% within pengetahuan anemia 96.8% 3.2%

KURANG (SKOR <60)

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 53.9% 14.3%

TTD

% of Total 47.9% 1.6%

CUKUP (SKOR 60-80) Count 134 33

Expected Count 148.2 18.8

% within pengetahuan anemia 80.2% 19.8%

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 40.4% 78.6%

TTD
 % of Total 35.8% 8.8%

Count 19 3

Expected Count 19.5 2.5

% within pengetahuan anemia 86.4% 13.6%

BAIK (SKOR > 80)

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 5.7% 7.1%

TTD

% of Total 5.1% 0.8%

Count 332 42

Expected Count 332.0 42.0

% within pengetahuan anemia 88.8% 11.2%

Total

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 100.0% 100.0%

TTD

% of Total 88.8% 11.2%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 24.156a 2 .000

Likelihood Ratio 26.278 2 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 17.236 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 374

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.47.

DUMMY TABLE UNTUK PENGETAHUAN

 Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value

TIDAK PATUH 0

PATUH 1

Categorical Variables Codings

Frequency Parameter coding

(1) (2)

KURANG (SKOR <60) 185 1.000 .000

pengetahuan anemia CUKUP (SKOR 60-80) 167 .000 1.000

BAIK (SKOR > 80) 22 .000 .000

Classification Tablea,b

Observed Predicted

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Percentage Correct

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

TIDAK PATUH 332 0 100.0

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD
Step 0 PATUH 42 0 .0

Overall Percentage 88.8

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is .500

 Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -2.067 .164 159.365 1 .000 .127

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

pengetahuan 24.156 2 .000

Variables pengetahuan(1) 23.425 1 .000

Step 0
pengetahuan(2) 22.026 1 .000

Overall Statistics 24.156 2 .000

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 26.278 2 .000

Step 1 Block 26.278 2 .000

Model 26.278 2 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R

Square Square
1 236.491a .068 .134

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter

estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Observed Predicted

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Percentage Correct

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

TIDAK PATUH 332 0 100.0

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD
Step 1 PATUH 42 0 .0

Overall Percentage 88.8

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C

Lower

pengetahuan 18.955 2 .000

pengetahuan(1) -1.550 .747 4.303 1 .038 .212 .0

Step 1a
pengetahuan(2) .444 .651 .466 1 .495 1.560 .4

Constant -1.846 .621 8.827 1 .003 .158

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan.

DUMMY TABLE BY RECODE

 Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for .212 .049 .918

pengetahuan(baik_kurang)
(.00 / 1.00)

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi .893 .754 1.056

TTD = TIDAK PATUH

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi 4.205 1.130 15.638

TTD = PATUH

N of Valid Cases 207

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for 1.560 .435 5.586

pengetahuan(baik_cukup) (0 /
1)

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi 1.076 .897 1.292

TTD = TIDAK PATUH

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi .690 .231 2.063

TTD = PATUH

N of Valid Cases 189

 dukungan teman sebaya * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD To

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

Count 283 8

Expected Count 258.3 32.7

% within dukungan teman 97.3% 2.7% 1

KURANG BAIK sebaya

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 85.2% 19.0%

TTD

% of Total 75.7% 2.1%

dukungan teman sebaya
Count 49 34

Expected Count 73.7 9.3

% within dukungan teman 59.0% 41.0% 1

BAIK sebaya

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 14.8% 81.0%

TTD

% of Total 13.1% 9.1%

Count 332 42

Expected Count 332.0 42.0

% within dukungan teman 88.8% 11.2% 1

Total sebaya

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 100.0% 100.0% 1

TTD

% of Total 88.8% 11.2% 1

Chi-Square Tests
 Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 94.606a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 90.811 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 77.153 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 94.353 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 374

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.32.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

dukungan teman sebaya * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD To

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

dukungan teman sebaya Count 283 8

Expected Count 258.3 32.7

% within dukungan teman 97.3% 2.7% 1

KURANG BAIK sebaya

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 85.2% 19.0%

TTD

% of Total 75.7% 2.1%

BAIK Count 49 34

Expected Count 73.7 9.3

% within dukungan teman 59.0% 41.0% 1

sebaya
 % within kepatuhan konsumsi 14.8% 81.0%
TTD

% of Total 13.1% 9.1%

Count 332 42

Expected Count 332.0 42.0

% within dukungan teman 88.8% 11.2% 1

Total sebaya

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 100.0% 100.0% 1

TTD

% of Total 88.8% 11.2% 1

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 94.606a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 90.811 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 77.153 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 94.353 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 374

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.32.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
 Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for dukungan teman 24.546 10.728 56.164

sebaya (KURANG BAIK /
BAIK)

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi 1.647 1.376 1.973

TTD = TIDAK PATUH

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi .067 .032 .139

TTD = PATUH

N of Valid Cases 374

dukungan guru * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

Count 177 5 182

Expected Count 161.6 20.4 182.0

% within dukungan guru 97.3% 2.7% 100.0%

KURANG BAIK

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 53.3% 11.9% 48.7%

TTD

% of Total 47.3% 1.3% 48.7%

dukungan guru
Count 155 37 192

Expected Count 170.4 21.6 192.0

% within dukungan guru 80.7% 19.3% 100.0%

BAIK

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 46.7% 88.1% 51.3%

TTD

% of Total 41.4% 9.9% 51.3%

 Count 332 42 374

Expected Count 332.0 42.0 374.0

% within dukungan guru 88.8% 11.2% 100.0%

Total

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

TTD

% of Total 88.8% 11.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 25.590a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 23.959 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 28.754 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 25.521 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 374

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.44.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for dukungan guru 8.450 3.241 22.035

(KURANG BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi 1.205 1.120 1.296
TTD = TIDAK PATUH

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi .143 .057 .355

TTD = PATUH

N of Valid Cases 374

dukungan orang tua * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

Count 285 11 296

Expected Count 262.8 33.2 296.0

% within dukungan orang tua 96.3% 3.7% 100.0%

KURANG BAIK

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 85.8% 26.2% 79.1%

TTD

% of Total 76.2% 2.9% 79.1%

dukungan orang tua
Count 47 31 78

Expected Count 69.2 8.8 78.0

% within dukungan orang tua 60.3% 39.7% 100.0%

BAIK

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 14.2% 73.8% 20.9%

TTD

% of Total 12.6% 8.3% 20.9%

Total Count 332 42 374

Expected Count 332.0 42.0 374.0

% within dukungan orang tua 88.8% 11.2% 100.0%

 % within kepatuhan konsumsi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
TTD

% of Total 88.8% 11.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 80.378a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 76.804 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 63.924 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 80.163 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 374

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.76.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for dukungan orang 17.089 8.041 36.318

tua (KURANG BAIK / BAIK)

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi 1.598 1.333 1.916

TTD = TIDAK PATUH

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi .094 .049 .178

TTD = PATUH
N of Valid Cases 374

dukungan tenaga kesehatan * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD T

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

Count 161 3

Expected Count 145.6 18.4

% within dukungan tenaga 98.2% 1.8%

KURANG BAIK kesehatan

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 48.5% 7.1%

TTD

% of Total 43.0% 0.8%

dukungan tenaga kesehatan
Count 171 39

Expected Count 186.4 23.6

% within dukungan tenaga 81.4% 18.6%

BAIK kesehatan

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 51.5% 92.9%

TTD

% of Total 45.7% 10.4%

Count 332 42

Expected Count 332.0 42.0

% within dukungan tenaga 88.8% 11.2%

Total kesehatan

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 100.0% 100.0%

TTD

% of Total 88.8% 11.2%

 Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 25.892a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 24.240 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 31.239 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 25.823 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 374

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18.42.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for dukungan tenaga 12.240 3.709 40.389

kesehatan (KURANG BAIK /
BAIK)

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi 1.206 1.126 1.290

TTD = TIDAK PATUH

For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi .098 .031 .313

TTD = PATUH

N of Valid Cases 374

MULTIVARIAT MODEL PREDIKSI/DETERMINAN METODE ENTER
1. Seleksi bivariat

variabel pvalue Kandidat multivariat

pengetahuan 0.000 Ya

Dukungan teman sebaya 0.000 Ya

Dukungan guru 0.000 Ya

Dukungan orang tua 0.000 Ya

Dukungan tenaga kesehatan 0.000 Ya

pengetahuan

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 26.278 2 .000

Step 1 Block 26.278 2 .000

Model 26.278 2 .000

D.teman sebaya

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 77.153 1 .000

Step 1 Block 77.153 1 .000

Model 77.153 1 .000

D.guru

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 28.754 1 .000

 Block 28.754 1 .000

Model 28.754 1 .000

D.orang tua

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 63.924 1 .000

Step 1 Block 63.924 1 .000

Model 63.924 1 .000

D.nakes

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 31.239 1 .000

Step 1 Block 31.239 1 .000

Model 31.239 1 .000

Pemodelan 1

Masukkan semua variabel independen kandidat multivariat

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for

EXP(B)

Lower Upper

Step 1a pengetahuan 5.516 2 .063

pengetahuan(1) -.848 .951 .795 1 .373 .428 .066 2.763

pengetahuan(2) .420 .861 .238 1 .625 1.523 .282 8.230

D.Teman 2.220 .515 18.545 1 .000 9.205 3.352 25.280

D.Guru -.189 .674 .079 1 .779 .828 .221 3.101

 D.Ortu 2.076 .447 21.574 1 .000 7.972 3.320 19.141

D.Nakes 1.538 .755 4.152 1 .042 4.654 1.060 20.426

Constant -10.638 1.771 36.082 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Guru, D.Ortu, D.Nakes.

D.Guru dikeluarkan dari pemodelan (pemodelan ke2)

yang paling besar dikeluarkan dari pemodelan multivariat yaitu variabel D.guru
(0.779>0.05)

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C

Lower

pengetahuan 5.440 2 .066

pengetahuan(1) -.798 .928 .739 1 .390 .450 .0

pengetahuan(2) .457 .844 .293 1 .588 1.580 .3

Step 1 a
D.Teman 2.169 .480 20.420 1 .000 8.751 3.4

D.Ortu 2.063 .444 21.565 1 .000 7.871 3.2

D.Nakes 1.452 .688 4.458 1 .035 4.270 1.1

Constant -10.750 1.722 38.951 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes.

Hitung perubahan OR (odds ratio) dengan menggunakan excel

OR tdk
OR ada Perubahan
variabel D.Guru ada
OR
D.Guru

pengetahuan      
-
pengetahuan(1) 0.428 0.45
5.140186916
-
pengetahuan(2) 1.523 1.58
3.742613263
D.Teman 9.205 8.751 4.932102118
D.Guru 0.828    
D.Ortu 7.972 7.871 1.26693427
D.Nakes 4.654 4.27 8.25096691
Tidak terdapat perubahan OR >10% pada semua variabel sehingga D.Guru bukan
merupakan variabel counfounding
pemodelan ke-3

keluarkan variabel yang >0.05 selanjutnya yaitu pengetahuan

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for EXP

Lower Up

D.Teman 2.384 .468 25.931 1 .000 10.849 4.334

D.Ortu 2.205 .433 25.900 1 .000 9.074 3.881

Step 1a
D.Nakes 1.359 .675 4.047 1 .044 3.891 1.036

Constant -11.074 1.474 56.444 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes.

Cek perubahan OR nya

OR ada OR tdk ada Perubahan

variabel Pengetahuan pengetahuan OR

pengetahuan      
pengetahuan(1) 0.45    
pengetahuan(2) 1.58    
-
D.Teman 8.751 10.849
23.97440293
D.Guru      
-
D.Ortu 7.871 9.074
15.28395375
D.Nakes 4.27 3.891 8.87587822
terdapat perubahan OR >10% pada variabel D.teman dan D.ortu sehingga
pengetahuan merupakan variabel counfounding sehingga variabel pengetahuan
dimasukkan kembali ke pemodelan multivariate.

Pemeriksaan Interaksi

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for

EXP(B)

Lower Upper
 D.Teman 2.169 .480 20.420 1 .000 8.751 3.415 22.420

D.Ortu 2.063 .444 21.565 1 .000 7.871 3.295 18.802

D.Nakes 1.452 .688 4.458 1 .035 4.270 1.110 16.429

Step 1 a
pengetahuan 5.440 2 .066

pengetahuan(1) -.798 .928 .739 1 .390 .450 .073 2.776

pengetahuan(2) .457 .844 .293 1 .588 1.580 .302 8.262

Constant -10.750 1.722 38.951 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes, pengetahuan.

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95

Lo

D.Teman 1.332 1.489 .800 1 .371 3.790

D.Ortu 1.161 1.596 .529 1 .467 3.193

D.Nakes 1.454 .690 4.444 1 .035 4.281

pengetahuan 5.505 2 .064

Step 1a
pengetahuan(1) -.815 .939 .753 1 .385 .443

pengetahuan(2) .460 .856 .288 1 .591 1.583

D.Ortu by D.Teman .547 .932 .344 1 .558 1.727

Constant -9.382 2.846 10.863 1 .001 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes, pengetahuan, D.Ortu * D.Teman .

tidak terdapat interaksi antara d.ortu dan d.teman sehingga dikeluarkan lagi dari
pemodelan
Pemodelan Akhir
Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for

EXP(B)

Lower Upper

Step 1 a
D.Teman 2.169 .480 20.420 1 .000 8.751 3.415 22.420

D.Ortu 2.063 .444 21.565 1 .000 7.871 3.295 18.802

D.Nakes 1.452 .688 4.458 1 .035 4.270 1.110 16.429

 pengetahuan 5.440 2 .066

pengetahuan(1) -.798 .928 .739 1 .390 .450 .073 2.776

pengetahuan(2) .457 .844 .293 1 .588 1.580 .302 8.262

Constant -10.750 1.722 38.951 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes, pengetahuan.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 119.705 5 .000

Step 1 Block 119.705 5 .000

Model 119.705 5 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R

Square Square

1 143.065 a
.274 .543

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter

estimates changed by less than .001.

Pada pemodelan akhir diperoleh variabel yang berhubungan signifikan dengan

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD adalah d.teman, d.ortu dan d.nakes yang dikontrol oleh
variabel confounding yaitu pengetahuan. Model yang terbentuk dinyatakan layak,
karena memenuhi kemaknaan model yang dilihat dari nilai omnibus test
9p=0.000). berdasarkan negerker R Square diperoleh nilai=0.543 artinya variabel
independen yang terdapat dalam model dapat menjelaskan kepatuhan konsumsi
TTD sebesar 54.3%. Variabel yang paling dominan berhubungan dengan
kepatuhan TTD adalah d.teman sebaya dengan OR=8.751 (995% CI OR : 3.415-
22.420) artinya remaja putri yang tidak mendapatkan dukungan darri teman
sebaya lebih beresiko untuk tidak patuh menngkonsumsi TTD 8.7 kali
dibandingkan dengan remaja putri yang mendapatkan dukungan dari teman
sebaya.
OUTPUT SAMPEL 187 (PUSKESMAS CAKUPAN
TERTINGGI/SEKIJANG)

UNIVARIAT

kelas responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

10 72 38.5 38.5 38.5

11 113 60.4 60.4 98.9

Valid
12 2 1.1 1.1 100.0

Total 187 100.0 100.0

umur responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

15 17 9.1 9.1 9.1

16 75 40.1 40.1 49.2

17 80 42.8 42.8 92.0

Valid
18 12 6.4 6.4 98.4

19 3 1.6 1.6 100.0

Total 187 100.0 100.0

tempat tinggal responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

ORANG TUA 138 73.8 73.8 73.8

SELAIN ORTU 9 4.8 4.8 78.6

Valid
PONPES 40 21.4 21.4 100.0

Total 187 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan anemia
 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent

KURANG (SKOR <60) 100 53.5 53.5 53.5

CUKUP (SKOR 60-80) 84 44.9 44.9 98.4

Valid
BAIK (SKOR > 80) 3 1.6 1.6 100.0

Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan teman sebaya

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

KURANG BAIK 142 75.9 75.9 75.9

Valid BAIK 45 24.1 24.1 100.0

Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan guru

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

KURANG BAIK 108 57.8 57.8 57.8

Valid BAIK 79 42.2 42.2 100.0

Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan orang tua

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

KURANG BAIK 145 77.5 77.5 77.5

Valid BAIK 42 22.5 22.5 100.0

Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan tenaga kesehatan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent
 KURANG BAIK 98 52.4 52.4 52.4

Valid BAIK 89 47.6 47.6 100.0

Total 187 100.0 100.0

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

TIDAK PATUH 150 80.2 80.2 80.2

Valid PATUH 37 19.8 19.8 100.0

Total 187 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan anemia * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

Count 95 5

Expected Count 80.2 19.8

% within pengetahuan anemia 95.0% 5.0%

KURANG (SKOR <60)
% within kepatuhan konsumsi 63.3% 13.5%
TTD

% of Total 50.8% 2.7%

Count 54 30

Expected Count 67.4 16.6

% within pengetahuan anemia 64.3% 35.7%

pengetahuan anemia CUKUP (SKOR 60-80)
% within kepatuhan konsumsi 36.0% 81.1%
TTD

% of Total 28.9% 16.0%

Count 1 2

Expected Count 2.4 .6

% within pengetahuan anemia 33.3% 66.7%

BAIK (SKOR > 80)
% within kepatuhan konsumsi 0.7% 5.4%
TTD

% of Total 0.5% 1.1%

Total Count 150 37

Expected Count 150.0 37.0

 % within pengetahuan anemia 80.2% 19.8%

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 100.0% 100.0%

TTD

% of Total 80.2% 19.8%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 31.357 a

2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 33.019 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 31.189 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 187

a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .59.

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C

Lower

pengetahuan 23.146 2 .000

pengetahuan(1) -3.638 1.308 7.736 1 .005 .026 .0

Step 1a
pengetahuan(2) -1.281 1.246 1.057 1 .304 .278 .0

Constant .693 1.225 .320 1 .571 2.000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan.

dukungan teman sebaya * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD To

TIDAK PATUH PATUH

dukungan teman sebaya KURANG BAIK Count 136 6

Expected Count 113.9 28.1

% within dukungan teman 95.8% 4.2% 1

sebaya

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 90.7% 16.2%

TTD
 % of Total 72.7% 3.2%

Count 14 31

Expected Count 36.1 8.9

% within dukungan teman 31.1% 68.9% 1

BAIK sebaya

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 9.3% 83.8%

TTD

% of Total 7.5% 16.6%

Count 150 37

Expected Count 150.0 37.0

% within dukungan teman 80.2% 19.8% 1

Total sebaya

% within kepatuhan konsumsi 100.0% 100.0% 1

TTD

% of Total 80.2% 19.8% 1

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 90.026a 1 .000

Continuity Correction b
85.998 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 80.526 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 89.545 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 187

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.90.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for dukungan teman 50.190 17.867 140.989

sebaya (KURANG BAIK /
BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi 3.078 1.990 4.762
TTD = TIDAK PATUH
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi .061 .027 .138
TTD = PATUH
N of Valid Cases 187