Lampiran 11

OUTPUT SPSS

A. OUTPUT SPSS UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS

1. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER PENGETAHUAN ANEMIA

Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Tot
an B1 an B2 an B3 an B4 an B5 an B6 an B7 an B8 an B9 an B10 an B11 an B12 an B13 an B14 an B15 al
Sko
rB
Pearson 1 .246 .227 .158 .644** .128 .091 -.058 .034 -.102 .288 .142 .142 .205 .193 .516
Pertanya Correlation **

an B1 Sig. (2-tailed) .183 .219 .397 .000 .491 .627 .756 .855 .584 .116 .445 .445 .267 .298 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .246 1 .132 .395* .246 .169 .377* .161 .010 .246 .398* .161 .338 -.114 .278 .634
Pertanya Correlation **

an B2 Sig. (2-tailed) .183 .479 .028 .183 .364 .036 .388 .957 .183 .026 .388 .063 .540 .130 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .227 .132 1 .007 -.055 .398* .231 -.093 .208 -.055 .108 -.093 -.093 .349 .525** .413
Pertanya Correlation *

an B3 Sig. (2-tailed) .219 .479 .970 .769 .027 .212 .619 .262 .769 .562 .619 .619 .054 .002 .021
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .158 .395* .007 1 .084 -.019 .239 .343 .210 .084 .288 .142 .343 .205 .193 .569
Pertanya Correlation **

an B4 Sig. (2-tailed) .397 .028 .970 .652 .919 .195 .059 .256 .652 .116 .445 .059 .267 .298 .001
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .644** .246 -.055 .084 1 .148 -.048 .229 -.069 .173 .114 .451* .451* -.116 .160 .495
Pertanya Correlation **

an B5 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .183 .769 .652 .428 .799 .215 .711 .351 .543 .011 .011 .533 .389 .005
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .128 .169 .398* -.019 .148 1 .289 .249 .214 -.016 .107 -.102 .074 .100 .338 .483
Pertanya Correlation **

an B6 Sig. (2-tailed) .491 .364 .027 .919 .428 .115 .177 .247 .933 .567 .585 .694 .591 .063 .006
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .091 .377* .231 .239 -.048 .289 1 .045 .180 .281 .455* .045 .045 -.088 .141 .538
Pertanya Correlation **

an B7 Sig. (2-tailed) .627 .036 .212 .195 .799 .115 .808 .332 .126 .010 .808 .808 .637 .448 .002
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
 Pearson -.058 .161 -.093 .343 .229 .249 .045 1 .392* .007 .012 .046 .285 -.398* .144 .332
Pertanya Correlation
an B8 Sig. (2-tailed) .756 .388 .619 .059 .215 .177 .808 .029 .970 .951 .805 .121 .027 .441 .068
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .034 .010 .208 .210 -.069 .214 .180 .392* 1 -.069 -.112 -.237 .183 .130 .177 .336
Pertanya Correlation
an B9 Sig. (2-tailed) .855 .957 .262 .256 .711 .247 .332 .029 .711 .547 .200 .325 .486 .341 .064
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson -.102 .246 -.055 .084 .173 -.016 .281 .007 -.069 1 -.222 .451* .229 -.116 -.116 .258
Pertanya Correlation
an B10 Sig. (2-tailed) .584 .183 .769 .652 .351 .933 .126 .970 .711 .231 .011 .215 .533 .535 .160
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .288 .398* .108 .288 .114 .107 .455* .012 -.112 -.222 1 -.168 .192 -.056 .260 .443
Pertanya Correlation *

an B11 Sig. (2-tailed) .116 .026 .562 .116 .543 .567 .010 .951 .547 .231 .365 .302 .766 .158 .012
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .142 .161 -.093 .142 .451* -.102 .045 .046 -.237 .451* -.168 1 .285 -.222 -.153 .237
Pertanya Correlation
an B12 Sig. (2-tailed) .445 .388 .619 .445 .011 .585 .808 .805 .200 .011 .365 .121 .231 .411 .200
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .142 .338 -.093 .343 .451* .074 .045 .285 .183 .229 .192 .285 1 .131 .144 .554
Pertanya Correlation **

an B13 Sig. (2-tailed) .445 .063 .619 .059 .011 .694 .808 .121 .325 .215 .302 .121 .483 .441 .001
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .205 -.114 .349 .205 -.116 .100 -.088 -.398* .130 -.116 -.056 -.222 .131 1 .297 .213
Pertanya Correlation
an B14 Sig. (2-tailed) .267 .540 .054 .267 .533 .591 .637 .027 .486 .533 .766 .231 .483 .105 .250
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .193 .278 .525** .193 .160 .338 .141 .144 .177 -.116 .260 -.153 .144 .297 1 .519
Pertanya Correlation **

an B15 Sig. (2-tailed) .298 .130 .002 .298 .389 .063 .448 .441 .341 .535 .158 .411 .441 .105 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .516** .634** .413* .569** .495** .483** .538** .332 .336 .258 .443* .237 .554** .213 .519** 1
Total Correlation
Skor B Sig. (2-tailed) .003 .000 .021 .001 .005 .006 .002 .068 .064 .160 .012 .200 .001 .250 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
Based on
Standardized
Items

.726 .730 10
 Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean Scale Corrected Squared Multiple Cronbach's Alpha

if Item Variance if Item-Total Correlation if Item Deleted
Deleted Item Deleted Correlation
Pertanyaan B1 4.74 4.531 .420 .580 .699
Pertanyaan B2 4.90 4.157 .546 .352 .675
Pertanyaan B3 5.35 4.970 .289 .464 .718
Pertanyaan B4 4.74 4.665 .345 .285 .711
Pertanyaan B5 4.68 4.759 .345 .632 .711
Pertanyaan B6 5.00 4.600 .306 .268 .720
Pertanyaan B7 5.03 4.432 .393 .359 .704
Pertanyaan B11 4.87 4.316 .468 .364 .690
Pertanyaan B13 4.65 4.837 .333 .385 .712
Pertanyaan B15 5.39 4.845 .445 .406 .702

2. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER DUKUNGAN

TEMAN SEBAYA

Correlations
Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Total
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Skor C
Pearson 1 .303 .544** .639** -.078 .635**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C1 Sig. (2-tailed) .098 .002 .000 .677 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .303 1 .501** .175 .003 .555**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C2 Sig. (2-tailed) .098 .004 .346 .987 .001
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .544** .501** 1 .629** .273 .890**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C3 Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .004 .000 .138 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .639** .175 .629** 1 .263 .773**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C4 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .346 .000 .153 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson -.078 .003 .273 .263 1 .512**
Pertanyaan Correlation
C5 Sig. (2-tailed) .677 .987 .138 .153 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .635** .555** .890** .773** .512** 1
Total Skor Correlation
C Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .001 .000 .000 .003
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
Based on
Standardized
Items
.686 .707 5
 Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Item- Squared Cronbach's
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Correlation Correlation Deleted
Pertanyaan C1 6.00 3.200 .482 .529 .635
Pertanyaan C2 5.65 3.237 .347 .306 .672
Pertanyaan C3 5.45 1.856 .735 .589 .465
Pertanyaan C4 5.97 2.766 .634 .584 .566
Pertanyaan C5 5.84 3.140 .182 .226 .763

3. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER DUKUNGAN

GURU

Correlations
Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Total
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Skor D
Pearson 1 .222 .604** .395* -.029 .665**
Pertanyaan Correlation
D1 Sig. (2-tailed) .230 .000 .028 .877 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .222 1 .448* .306 .187 .627**
Pertanyaan Correlation
D2 Sig. (2-tailed) .230 .012 .094 .314 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .604** .448* 1 .700** .142 .860**
Pertanyaan Correlation
D3 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .012 .000 .445 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .395* .306 .700** 1 .148 .775**
Pertanyaan Correlation
D4 Sig. (2-tailed) .028 .094 .000 .426 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson -.029 .187 .142 .148 1 .425*
Pertanyaan Correlation
D5 Sig. (2-tailed) .877 .314 .445 .426 .017
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .665** .627** .860** .775** .425* 1
Total Skor Correlation
D Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .017
N 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

Based on
Standardized
Items

.690 .694 5
 Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Item- Squared Cronbach's
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Correlation Correlation Deleted
Pertanyaan D1 9.19 3.228 .422 .381 .651
Pertanyaan D2 9.26 3.465 .407 .218 .655
Pertanyaan D3 9.19 2.895 .757 .661 .511
Pertanyaan D4 9.35 2.837 .574 .494 .577
Pertanyaan D5 10.61 3.978 .143 .062 .757

4. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER DUKUNGAN

ORANG TUA
Correlations
Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Tota
an E1 an E2 an E3 an E4 an E5 an E6 an E7 l
Skor
E
Pearson 1 .458** .270 .151 -.004 .409* .513** .637*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E1 Sig. (2- .010 .142 .418 .984 .022 .003 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .458** 1 .343 .373* .338 .210 .256 .520*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E2 Sig. (2- .010 .059 .039 .063 .257 .164 .003
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .270 .343 1 .737** .323 .659** .638** .808*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E3 Sig. (2- .142 .059 .000 .076 .000 .000 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .151 .373* .737** 1 .712** .424* .392* .721*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E4 Sig. (2- .418 .039 .000 .000 .017 .029 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson -.004 .338 .323 .712** 1 .228 .059 .465*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E5 Sig. (2- .984 .063 .076 .000 .217 .754 .008
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .409* .210 .659** .424* .228 1 .769** .821*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an E6 Sig. (2- .022 .257 .000 .017 .217 .000 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pertanya Pearson .513** .256 .638** .392* .059 .769** 1 .811*
an E7 Correlati *

on
Sig. (2- .003 .164 .000 .029 .754 .000 .000
tailed)
 N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .637** .520** .808** .721** .465** .821** .811** 1
Correlati
Total on
Skor E Sig. (2- .000 .003 .000 .000 .008 .000 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

Based on
Standardized
Items

.796 .819 7

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Item- Squared Cronbach's
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Correlation Correlation Deleted
Pertanyaan E1 7.16 3.873 .405 .426 .812
Pertanyaan E2 7.42 5.052 .461 .369 .796
Pertanyaan E3 7.29 3.946 .722 .763 .736
Pertanyaan E4 7.26 4.265 .621 .808 .758
Pertanyaan E5 7.23 4.714 .304 .665 .805
Pertanyaan E6 7.13 3.516 .703 .686 .731
Pertanyaan E7 7.23 3.647 .698 .695 .733

5. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER DUKUNGAN

TENAGA KESEHATAN
Correlations
Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Pertanya Total
an F1 an F2 an F3 an F4 an F5 an F6 an F7 Skor
F
Pearson 1 .582** .398* .358* .182 .101 .317 .651*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F1 Sig. (2- .001 .027 .048 .326 .590 .082 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .582** 1 .637** .506** .193 .177 .095 .728*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F2 Sig. (2- .001 .000 .004 .298 .340 .613 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .398* .637** 1 .598** .268 .142 .308 .746*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F3 Sig. (2- .027 .000 .000 .145 .447 .092 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
 Pearson .358* .506** .598** 1 .211 .237 .051 .677*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F4 Sig. (2- .048 .004 .000 .254 .199 .785 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .182 .193 .268 .211 1 .470** .314 .632*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F5 Sig. (2- .326 .298 .145 .254 .008 .085 .000
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .101 .177 .142 .237 .470** 1 .054 .527*
Correlati *

Pertanya on
an F6 Sig. (2- .590 .340 .447 .199 .008 .773 .002
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .317 .095 .308 .051 .314 .054 1 .433*
Correlati
Pertanya on
an F7 Sig. (2- .082 .613 .092 .785 .085 .773 .015
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .651** .728** .746** .677** .632** .527** .433* 1
Correlati
Total on
Skor F Sig. (2- .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .002 .015
tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

Based on
Standardized
Items

.744 .746 7

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Item- Squared Cronbach's
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Correlation Correlation Deleted
Pertanyaan F1 13.03 7.766 .494 .424 .706
Pertanyaan F2 12.90 7.224 .581 .579 .683
Pertanyaan F3 12.68 7.426 .625 .580 .677
Pertanyaan F4 12.61 7.578 .521 .430 .699
Pertanyaan F5 13.26 7.398 .416 .319 .728
Pertanyaan F6 13.00 8.200 .320 .257 .745
Pertanyaan F7 13.29 9.013 .286 .291 .745
6. UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS KUESIONER KEPATUHAN
KONSUMSI TTD
Correlations
Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Pertanyaan Total Skor
G1 G2 G3 G4 G
Pearson 1 .805** .360* .563** .834**
Pertanyaan Correlation
G1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .047 .001 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .805** 1 .561** .377* .838**
Pertanyaan Correlation
G2 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .001 .036 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .360* .561** 1 .678** .796**
Pertanyaan Correlation
G3 Sig. (2-tailed) .047 .001 .000 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .563** .377* .678** 1 .802**
Pertanyaan Correlation
G4 Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .036 .000 .000
N 31 31 31 31 31
Pearson .834** .838** .796** .802** 1
Correlation
Total Skor G .000 .000 .000 .000
Sig. (2-tailed)
N 31 31 31 31 31
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Cronbach's N of Items

Alpha Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items

.834 .834 4
B. OUTPUT SPSS 374 SAMPLE (WILAYAH KABUPATEN PELALAWAN)
1. ANALISIS UNIVARIAT
kelas responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
10 156 41.7 41.7 41.7
11 180 48.1 48.1 89.8
Valid 12 38 10.2 10.2 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

umur responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
15 40 10.7 10.7 10.7
16 145 38.8 38.8 49.5
17 129 34.5 34.5 84.0
Valid 18 50 13.4 13.4 97.3
19 10 2.7 2.7 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

tempat tinggal responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
ORANG TUA 310 82.9 82.9 82.9
SELAIN ORTU 15 4.0 4.0 86.9
Valid PONPES 49 13.1 13.1 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan anemia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG (SKOR <60) 203 54.3 54.3 54.3
CUKUP (SKOR 60-80) 164 43.9 43.9 98.1
Valid BAIK (SKOR > 80) 7 1.9 1.9 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

dukungan guru
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 282 75.4 75.4 75.4
Valid BAIK 92 24.6 24.6 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

dukungan orang tua

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 300 80.2 80.2 80.2
Valid BAIK 74 19.8 19.8 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0
 kepatuhan konsumsi TTD
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
TIDAK PATUH 329 88.0 88.0 88.0
Valid PATUH 45 12.0 12.0 100.0
Total 374 100.0 100.0

2. ANALISIS BIVARIAT

pengetahuan anemia * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 196 7 203
KURANG (SKOR Expected Count 178.6 24.4 203.0
<60) % within pengetahuan 96.6% 3.4% 100.0%
anemia
Count 131 33 164
pengetahuan CUKUP (SKOR Expected Count 144.3 19.7 164.0
anemia 60-80) % within pengetahuan 79.9% 20.1% 100.0%
anemia
Count 2 5 7
BAIK (SKOR > Expected Count 6.2 .8 7.0
80) % within pengetahuan 28.6% 71.4% 100.0%
anemia
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within pengetahuan 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
anemia

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 47.604a 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 40.979 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 40.913 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .84.
DUMMY VARIABEL PENGETAHUAN ANEMIA CARA REGRESI
LOGISTIK SEDERHANA
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 30.465 2 .000
Step pengetahuan(1) -4.248 .921 21.286 1 .000 .014 .002 .087
1a pengetahuan(2) -2.295 .859 7.137 1 .008 .101 .019 .543
Constant .916 .837 1.199 1 .273 2.500
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan.
 dukungan teman sebaya * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 296 8 304
KURANG Expected Count 267.4 36.6 304.0
BAIK % within dukungan teman 97.4% 2.6% 100.0%
dukungan teman sebaya
sebaya Count 33 37 70
Expected Count 61.6 8.4 70.0
BAIK
% within dukungan teman 47.1% 52.9% 100.0%
sebaya
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan teman 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
sebaya

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 135.608a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 130.904 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 104.137 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 135.245 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.42.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan teman sebaya (KURANG 41.485 17.827 96.540
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 2.065 1.611 2.649
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .050 .024 .102
N of Valid Cases 374

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for .014 .002 .087
baiikdankurang (0 / 1)
For cohort kepatuhan .296 .092 .955
konsumsi TTD = TIDAK
PATUH
For cohort kepatuhan 20.714 8.716 49.229
konsumsi TTD = PATUH
 N of Valid Cases 210

dukungan guru * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 275 7 282
KURANG Expected Count 248.1 33.9 282.0
BAIK % within dukungan 97.5% 2.5% 100.0%
guru
dukungan guru
Count 54 38 92
Expected Count 80.9 11.1 92.0
BAIK
% within dukungan 58.7% 41.3% 100.0%
guru
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
guru

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 98.777a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 95.144 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 84.627 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 98.513 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan guru (KURANG BAIK / BAIK) 27.646 11.730 65.155
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.661 1.398 1.974
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .060 .028 .130
N of Valid Cases 374

dukungan guru * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
dukungan guru KURANG Count 275 7 282
BAIK Expected Count 248.1 33.9 282.0
 % within dukungan 97.5% 2.5% 100.0%
guru
Count 54 38 92
Expected Count 80.9 11.1 92.0
BAIK
% within dukungan 58.7% 41.3% 100.0%
guru
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
guru

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 98.777a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 95.144 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 84.627 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 98.513 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for dukungan guru (KURANG BAIK / BAIK) 27.646 11.730 65.155
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.661 1.398 1.974
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .060 .028 .130
N of Valid Cases 374

dukungan orang tua * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
dukungan orang KURANG Count 285 15 300
tua BAIK Expected Count 263.9 36.1 300.0
 % within dukungan orang 95.0% 5.0% 100.0%
tua
Count 44 30 74
Expected Count 65.1 8.9 74.0
BAIK
% within dukungan orang 59.5% 40.5% 100.0%
tua
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan orang 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
tua

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 70.838a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 67.520 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 55.907 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 70.648 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.90.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan orang tua (KURANG BAIK / 12.955 6.456 25.993
BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK 1.598 1.321 1.932
PATUH
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .123 .070 .217
N of Valid Cases 374

dukungan tenaga kesehatan * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
dukungan tenaga KURANG Count 232 5 237
kesehatan BAIK Expected Count 208.5 28.5 237.0
% within dukungan tenaga 97.9% 2.1% 100.0%
kesehatan
 Count 97 40 137
Expected Count 120.5 16.5 137.0
BAIK
% within dukungan tenaga 70.8% 29.2% 100.0%
kesehatan
Count 329 45 374
Expected Count 329.0 45.0 374.0
Total
% within dukungan tenaga 88.0% 12.0% 100.0%
kesehatan

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 60.182a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 57.650 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 60.987 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 60.021 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 374
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.48.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan tenaga kesehatan (KURANG 19.134 7.331 49.943
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.383 1.240 1.542
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .072 .029 .179
N of Valid Cases 374

3. ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT
a. Seleksi Bivariat
pengetahuan anemia

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 40.979 2 .000

Step 1 Block 40.979 2 .000

Model 40.979 2 .000

dukungan teman sebaya

 Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 104.137 1 .000

Step 1 Block 104.137 1 .000

Model 104.137 1 .000

dukungan guru

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 84.627 1 .000

Step 1 Block 84.627 1 .000

Model 84.627 1 .000

dukungan orang tua

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 55.907 1 .000

Step 1 Block 55.907 1 .000

Model 55.907 1 .000

dukungan tenaga kesehatan
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 60.987 1 .000

Step 1 Block 60.987 1 .000

Model 60.987 1 .000

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 152.717 6 .000

Step 1 Block 152.717 6 .000

Model 152.717 6 .000

tahap pertama

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 9.663 2 .008
pengetahuan(1) -2.967 1.085 7.484 1 .006 .051 .006 .431
pengetahuan(2) -1.686 1.028 2.689 1 .101 .185 .025 1.390
Step D.Teman 2.418 .535 20.390 1 .000 11.219 3.928 32.040
1a D.Guru 1.131 .577 3.841 1 .050 3.100 1.000 9.608
D.Ortu 1.367 .489 7.808 1 .005 3.922 1.504 10.229
D.Nakes 1.355 .589 5.291 1 .021 3.878 1.222 12.304
Constant -9.209 1.696 29.499 1 .000 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Guru, D.Ortu, D.Nakes.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 152.717 6 .000
Step 1 Block 152.717 6 .000
Model 152.717 6 .000

Model Summary
Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Square Square
1 122.221a .335 .644
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because
parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
C. OUTPUT SPSS 187 SAMPLE (WILAYAH PUSKESMAS CAKUPAN
TERTINGGI/SEKIJANG)
1. ANALISIS UNIVARIAT
kelas responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
10 72 38.5 38.5 38.5
11 113 60.4 60.4 98.9
Valid 12 2 1.1 1.1 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

umur responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent
17 9.1 9.1 9.1
15

75 40.1 40.1 49.2

16

80 42.8 42.8 92.0

17
Valid
12 6.4 6.4 98.4
18

3 1.6 1.6 100.0

19

187 100.0 100.0

Total

tempat tinggal responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
ORANG TUA 138 73.8 73.8 73.8
SELAIN ORTU 9 4.8 4.8 78.6
Valid PONPES 40 21.4 21.4 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0
pengetahuan anemia

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent
KURANG (SKOR 100 53.5 53.5 53.5
<60)
CUKUP (SKOR 60- 84 44.9 44.9 98.4
80)
Valid
3 1.6 1.6 100.0
BAIK (SKOR > 80)

187 100.0 100.0

Total
 dukungan teman sebaya
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 142 75.9 75.9 75.9
Valid BAIK 45 24.1 24.1 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan guru
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 130 69.5 69.5 69.5
Valid BAIK 57 30.5 30.5 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan orang tua

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 145 77.5 77.5 77.5
Valid BAIK 42 22.5 22.5 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan tenaga kesehatan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 108 57.8 57.8 57.8
Valid BAIK 79 42.2 42.2 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
TIDAK PATUH 152 81.3 81.3 81.3
Valid PATUH 35 18.7 18.7 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

2. ANALISIS BIVARIAT
pengetahuan anemia * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
pengetahuan Count 95 5 100
anemia KURANG (SKOR Expected Count 81.3 18.7 100.0
<60) % within pengetahuan 95.0% 5.0% 100.0%
anemia
Count 56 28 84
CUKUP (SKOR Expected Count 68.3 15.7 84.0
60-80) % within pengetahuan 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
anemia
BAIK (SKOR > Count 1 2 3
80) Expected Count 2.4 .6 3.0
 % within pengetahuan 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
anemia
Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within pengetahuan 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
anemia

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 28.697a 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 29.844 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 28.502 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .56.
NILAI POR PENGETAHUAN ANEMIA >< KEPATUHAN KONSUMSI
TTD (DUMMY VARIABEL MENGGUNAKAN CARA REGRESI
LOGISTIK SEDERHANA)
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C
Lower
pengetahuan 21.393 2 .000
pengetahuan(1) -3.638 1.308 7.736 1 .005 .026 .0
Step 1a
pengetahuan(2) -1.386 1.246 1.237 1 .266 .250 .0
Constant .693 1.225 .320 1 .571 2.000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan.

dukungan teman sebaya * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 138 4 142
KURANG Expected Count 115.4 26.6 142.0
BAIK % within dukungan teman 97.2% 2.8% 100.0%
dukungan teman sebaya
sebaya Count 14 31 45
Expected Count 36.6 8.4 45.0
BAIK
% within dukungan teman 31.1% 68.9% 100.0%
sebaya
Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan teman 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
sebaya

Chi-Square Tests
 Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 98.054a 1 .000
Continuity Correction b 93.759 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 88.059 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 97.530 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.42.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan teman sebaya (KURANG 76.393 23.533 247.991
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 3.124 2.021 4.829
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .041 .015 .110
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan guru * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 128 2 130
KURANG Expected Count 105.7 24.3 130.0
BAIK % within dukungan 98.5% 1.5% 100.0%
guru
dukungan guru
Count 24 33 57
Expected Count 46.3 10.7 57.0
BAIK
% within dukungan 42.1% 57.9% 100.0%
guru
Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
guru

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 82.724a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 79.061 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 82.042 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 82.282 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan guru (KURANG BAIK / BAIK) 88.000 19.786 391.396
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 2.338 1.723 3.173
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .027 .007 .107
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan orang tua * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 136 9 145
KURANG Expected Count 117.9 27.1 145.0
BAIK % within dukungan orang 93.8% 6.2% 100.0%
dukungan orang tua
tua Count 16 26 42
Expected Count 34.1 7.9 42.0
BAIK
% within dukungan orang 38.1% 61.9% 100.0%
tua
Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan orang 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
tua

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 66.409a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 62.798 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 57.020 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 66.053 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.86.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan orang tua (KURANG BAIK / 24.556 9.804 61.500
BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK 2.462 1.671 3.628
PATUH
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .100 .051 .197
N of Valid Cases 187
 dukungan tenaga kesehatan * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 107 1 108
KURANG Expected Count 87.8 20.2 108.0
BAIK % within dukungan tenaga 99.1% 0.9% 100.0%
dukungan tenaga kesehatan
kesehatan Count 45 34 79
Expected Count 64.2 14.8 79.0
BAIK
% within dukungan tenaga 57.0% 43.0% 100.0%
kesehatan
Count 152 35 187
Expected Count 152.0 35.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan tenaga 81.3% 18.7% 100.0%
kesehatan

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 53.186a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 50.453 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 60.965 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear 52.901 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan tenaga kesehatan (KURANG 80.844 10.737 608.724
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.739 1.435 2.109
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .022 .003 .154
N of Valid Cases 187

3. ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT
 Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square df Sig.
Step 29.844 2 .000
Step 1 Block 29.844 2 .000
Model 29.844 2 .000

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 88.059 1 .000
Step 1 Block 88.059 1 .000
Model 88.059 1 .000

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 82.042 1 .000
Step 1 Block 82.042 1 .000
Model 82.042 1 .000

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 57.020 1 .000
Step 1 Block 57.020 1 .000
Model 57.020 1 .000

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 60.965 1 .000
Step 1 Block 60.965 1 .000
Model 60.965 1 .000

pemodelan tahap pertama

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan .321 2 .852
pengetahuan(1) .668 1.588 .177 1 .674 1.950 .087 43.780
pengetahuan(2) .799 1.437 .309 1 .578 2.224 .133 37.203
Step D.Teman 2.218 .836 7.048 1 .008 9.192 1.787 47.281
1a D.Guru 1.660 .997 2.770 1 .096 5.257 .745 37.111
D.Ortu 1.969 .691 8.114 1 .004 7.163 1.848 27.765
D.Nakes 2.967 1.153 6.624 1 .010 19.430 2.029 186.073
- 3.509 21.225 1 .000 .000
Constant
16.165
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Guru, D.Ortu, D.Nakes.

Pemodelan tahap kedua variabel pengetahuan dikeluarkan dari model multivariat

Variables in the Equation
 B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
D.Teman 2.208 .792 7.763 1 .005 9.099 1.925 43.008
D.Guru 1.656 .989 2.807 1 .094 5.240 .755 36.386
Step 1a D.Ortu 1.984 .672 8.703 1 .003 7.270 1.946 27.162
D.Nakes 2.907 1.139 6.510 1 .011 18.303 1.962 170.746
Constant -15.329 2.904 27.869 1 .000 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Guru, D.Ortu, D.Nakes.

Cek Nilai Perubahan OR

OR ada OR tdk ada

variabel Perubahan OR
pengetahuan pengetahuan

pengetahuan    
 
pengetahuan(1) 1.95  
 
pengetahuan(2) 2.224  
 
D.Teman 9.192 9.099 1.011749347
D.Guru 5.257 5.24 0.323378353
D.Ortu 7.163 7.27 -1.493787519
D.Nakes 19.43 18.303 5.800308801

tidak terdapat perubahan OR >10% pada variabel lainnya sehingga variabel

pengetahuan bukan merupakan variabel confounding
Pemodelan Tahap Ketiga Variabel Dukungan Guru dikeluarkan dari pemodelan
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
D.Teman 2.977 .689 18.664 1 .000 19.634 5.086 75.791
D.Ortu 2.251 .660 11.639 1 .001 9.500 2.606 34.629
Step 1a D.Nakes 2.944 1.132 6.763 1 .009 19.000 2.065 174.783
Constant -14.104 2.579 29.918 1 .000 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes.

Cek Nilai Perubahan OR

OR ada OR tdk ada Perubahan
variabel d.guru d.guru OR
DukunganTeman -
9.099 19.634
Sebaya 115.7819541
Dukungan Guru 5.24    
Dukungan -
7.27 9.5
Orang Tua 30.67400275
Dukungan 18.303 19 -
 Tenaga
Kesehatan 3.808118888
terdapat perubahan OR >10% pada variabel dukungan teman sebaya dan
dukungan orang tua sehingga variabel dukungan guru adalah merupakan variabel
confounding sehingga dimasukkan kembali kedalam pemodelan.

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
D.Teman 2.208 .792 7.763 1 .005 9.099 1.925 43.008
D.Ortu 1.984 .672 8.703 1 .003 7.270 1.946 27.162
Step 1a D.Nakes 2.907 1.139 6.510 1 .011 18.303 1.962 170.746
D.Guru 1.656 .989 2.807 1 .094 5.240 .755 36.386
Constant -15.329 2.904 27.869 1 .000 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes, D.Guru.

Pemeriksaan Interaksi
Dukungan Teman dan Dukungan tenaga kesehatan
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
D.Teman 35.141 7296.689 .000 1 .996 1826561478124378.000 .000 .
D.Ortu 2.024 .664 9.301 1 .002 7.566 2.061 27.776
D.Nakes 35.236 7296.689 .000 1 .996 2007987731462083.000 .000 .
Step D.Guru 1.619 1.003 2.603 1 .107 5.048 .706 36.078
1a D.Nakes - 3648.344 .000 1 .996 .000 .000 .
by 16.577
D.Teman
- 14593.377 .000 1 .996 .000
Constant
79.600
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes, D.Guru, D.Nakes * D.Teman .

Tidak ada interaksi antara dukungan teman dan dukungan tenaga kesehatan
karena nilai p.value=0.996 (p>0.05).
Pemeriksaan Interaksi Dukungan Teman dan Dukungan Orang Tua
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
Step D.Teman .190 2.396 .006 1 .937 1.210 .011 132.511
1a D.Ortu -.242 2.637 .008 1 .927 .785 .004 137.914
D.Nakes 2.867 1.163 6.077 1 .014 17.592 1.800 171.964
D.Guru 1.961 1.046 3.513 1 .061 7.106 .914 55.227
D.Ortu by 1.317 1.519 .751 1 .386 3.730 .190 73.196
D.Teman
 Constant -12.383 4.308 8.264 1 .004 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes, D.Guru, D.Ortu * D.Teman .

Tidak ada interaksi antara dukungan teman dan dukungan orang tua karena nilai
p.value=0.386 (p>0.05).

Pemodelan Akhir

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
D.Teman 2.208 .792 7.763 1 .005 9.099 1.925 43.008
D.Ortu 1.984 .672 8.703 1 .003 7.270 1.946 27.162
Step 1a D.Nakes 2.907 1.139 6.510 1 .011 18.303 1.962 170.746
D.Guru 1.656 .989 2.807 1 .094 5.240 .755 36.386
Constant -15.329 2.904 27.869 1 .000 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Nakes, D.Guru.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 118.696 4 .000
Step 1 Block 118.696 4 .000
Model 118.696 4 .000

Model Summary
Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Square Square
1 61.605a .470 .760
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because
parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
D. OUTPUT SPSS 187 SAMPLE (WILAYAH PUSKESMAS CAKUPAN
TERENDAH/LANGGAM)
kelas responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
10 84 44.9 44.9 44.9
11 67 35.8 35.8 80.7
Valid 12 36 19.3 19.3 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

umur responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
15 23 12.3 12.3 12.3
16 70 37.4 37.4 49.7
17 49 26.2 26.2 75.9
Valid 18 38 20.3 20.3 96.3
19 7 3.7 3.7 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

tempat tinggal responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
ORANG TUA 172 92.0 92.0 92.0
SELAIN ORTU 6 3.2 3.2 95.2
Valid PONPES 9 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan anemia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG (SKOR <60) 103 55.1 55.1 55.1
CUKUP (SKOR 60-80) 80 42.8 42.8 97.9
Valid BAIK (SKOR > 80) 4 2.1 2.1 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0
 dukungan teman sebaya
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 162 86.6 86.6 86.6
Valid BAIK 25 13.4 13.4 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan guru
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 152 81.3 81.3 81.3
Valid BAIK 35 18.7 18.7 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan orang tua

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 155 82.9 82.9 82.9
Valid BAIK 32 17.1 17.1 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

dukungan tenaga kesehatan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
KURANG BAIK 108 57.8 57.8 57.8
Valid BAIK 79 42.2 42.2 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
TIDAK PATUH 177 94.7 94.7 94.7
Valid PATUH 10 5.3 5.3 100.0
Total 187 100.0 100.0

2. ANALISIS BIVARIAT
pengetahuan anemia * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation
kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 101 2 103
KURANG (SKOR Expected Count 97.5 5.5 103.0
<60) % within pengetahuan 98.1% 1.9% 100.0%
anemia
pengetahuan Count 75 5 80
anemia CUKUP (SKOR Expected Count 75.7 4.3 80.0
60-80) % within pengetahuan 93.8% 6.3% 100.0%
anemia
BAIK (SKOR > Count 1 3 4
80) Expected Count 3.8 .2 4.0
 % within pengetahuan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%
anemia
Count 177 10 187
Expected Count 177.0 10.0 187.0
Total
% within pengetahuan 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
anemia

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 40.828a 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 16.393 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 14.261 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .21.
NILAI OR PENGETAHUAN ANEMIA >< KEPATUHAN KONSUMSI
TTD (DUMMY VARIABEL MENGGUNAKAN CARA REGRESI
LOGISTIK SEDERHANA)
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 13.728 2 .001
Step pengetahuan(1) -5.021 1.358 13.675 1 .000 .007 .000 .094
1a pengetahuan(2) -3.807 1.244 9.369 1 .002 .022 .002 .254
Constant 1.099 1.155 .905 1 .341 3.000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan.

dukungan teman sebaya * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
158 4 162
Count

KURANG 153.3 8.7 162.0

Expected Count
BAIK
% within dukungan teman 97.5% 2.5% 100.0%
dukungan teman sebaya
sebaya 19 6 25
Count

23.7 1.3 25.0

BAIK Expected Count

% within dukungan teman 76.0% 24.0% 100.0%

sebaya
177 10 187
Count

177.0 10.0 187.0

Total Expected Count

% within dukungan teman 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%

sebaya
 Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 19.836a 1 .000

Continuity Correction b
15.810 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 12.961 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 19.730 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 187

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan teman sebaya (KURANG 12.474 3.228 48.198
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.283 1.028 1.602
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .103 .031 .339
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan guru * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Total
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 147 5 152
KURANG Expected Count 143.9 8.1 152.0
BAIK % within dukungan 96.7% 3.3% 100.0%
guru
dukungan guru
Count 30 5 35
Expected Count 33.1 1.9 35.0
BAIK
% within dukungan 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%
guru
Count 177 10 187
Expected Count 177.0 10.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
guru
 Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.796a 1 .009
Continuity Correctionb 4.797 1 .029
Likelihood Ratio 5.340 1 .021
Fisher's Exact Test .022 .022
Linear-by-Linear 6.760 1 .009
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.87.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan guru (KURANG BAIK / BAIK) 4.900 1.335 17.985
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.128 .982 1.296
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .230 .070 .752
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan orang tua * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 149 6 155
KURANG Expected Count 146.7 8.3 155.0
BAIK % within dukungan orang 96.1% 3.9% 100.0%
dukungan orang tua
tua Count 28 4 32
Expected Count 30.3 1.7 32.0
BAIK
% within dukungan orang 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
tua
Count 177 10 187
Expected Count 177.0 10.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan orang 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
tua

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.902a 1 .048
Continuity Correctionb 2.383 1 .123
Likelihood Ratio 3.128 1 .077
Fisher's Exact Test .070 .070
Linear-by-Linear 3.881 1 .049
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan orang tua (KURANG 3.548 .940 13.387
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK 1.099 .960 1.257
PATUH
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .310 .093 1.035
N of Valid Cases 187

dukungan tenaga kesehatan * kepatuhan konsumsi TTD Crosstabulation

kepatuhan konsumsi Total
TTD
TIDAK PATUH
PATUH
Count 125 4 129
KURANG Expected Count 122.1 6.9 129.0
BAIK % within dukungan tenaga 96.9% 3.1% 100.0%
dukungan tenaga kesehatan
kesehatan Count 52 6 58
Expected Count 54.9 3.1 58.0
BAIK
% within dukungan tenaga 89.7% 10.3% 100.0%
kesehatan
Count 177 10 187
Expected Count 177.0 10.0 187.0
Total
% within dukungan tenaga 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
kesehatan

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
(2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.148a
1 .042
Continuity Correctionb 2.840 1 .092
Likelihood Ratio 3.782 1 .052
Fisher's Exact Test .072 .050
Linear-by-Linear 4.126 1 .042
Association
N of Valid Cases 187
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.10.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for dukungan tenaga kesehatan (KURANG 3.606 .977 13.308
BAIK / BAIK)
For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = TIDAK PATUH 1.081 .985 1.186
 For cohort kepatuhan konsumsi TTD = PATUH .300 .088 1.022
N of Valid Cases 187

3. ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 16.393 2 .000

Step 1 Block 16.393 2 .000

Model 16.393 2 .000

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 12.961 1 .000

Step 1 Block 12.961 1 .000

Model 12.961 1 .000

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 5.340 1 .021

Step 1 Block 5.340 1 .021

Model 5.340 1 .021

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 3.128 1 .077

Step 1 Block 3.128 1 .077

Model 3.128 1 .077

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 3.782 1 .052

Step 1 Block 3.782 1 .052

Model 3.782 1 .052

Pemodelan Tahap Pertama

Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
 pengetahuan 12.667 2 .002
pengetahuan(1) -5.660 1.604 12.454 1 .000 .003 .000 .081
pengetahuan(2) -3.207 1.502 4.559 1 .033 .040 .002 .769
Step D.Teman 3.311 .967 11.727 1 .001 27.400 4.120 182.236
1a D.Guru 1.382 1.138 1.475 1 .225 3.982 .428 37.036
D.Ortu .816 .902 .818 1 .366 2.262 .386 13.263
D.Nakes -.203 .926 .048 1 .827 .816 .133 5.009
Constant -6.213 2.899 4.592 1 .032 .002
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Guru, D.Ortu, D.Nakes.

Pemodelan tahap Kedua mengeluarkan variabel dukungan tenaga kesehatan dari

model multivariat.

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 12.711 2 .002
pengetahuan(1) -5.618 1.591 12.470 1 .000 .004 .000 .082
pengetahuan(2) -3.195 1.507 4.498 1 .034 .041 .002 .785
Step
D.Teman 3.271 .949 11.887 1 .001 26.327 4.101 168.985
1a
D.Guru 1.298 1.072 1.467 1 .226 3.661 .448 29.905
D.Ortu .782 .886 .779 1 .377 2.185 .385 12.403
Constant -6.312 2.874 4.824 1 .028 .002
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Guru, D.Ortu.

Cek Perubahan Nilai OR

OR ada OR tdk ada Perubahan

variabel D.NAKES D. NAKES OR

pengetahuan      
pengetahuan(1) 0.003 0.004
-33.33333333
pengetahuan(2) 0.04 0.041
-2.5
D.Teman 27.4 26.327 3.916058394
D.Guru 3.982 3.661 8.061275741
D.Ortu 2.262 2.185 3.404067197
D.Nakes 0.816    
Dukungan tenaga kesehatan tidak merubah nilai OR > 10% sehingga bukan
variabel confounding.
Pemodelan Tahap ketiga mengeluarkan variabel dukungan orang tua
Variables in the Equation
 B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 13.309 2 .001
pengetahuan(1) -5.747 1.591 13.048 1 .000 .003 .000 .072
Step pengetahuan(2) -3.336 1.522 4.803 1 .028 .036 .002 .703
1a D.Teman 3.275 .947 11.947 1 .001 26.432 4.128 169.251
D.Guru 1.464 1.056 1.921 1 .166 4.321 .546 34.227
Constant -5.404 2.691 4.033 1 .045 .004
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Guru.

Cek Nilai Perubahan OR

OR ada d.orang OR tdk ada Perubahan

variabel tua d.orang tua OR

pengetahuan      
pengetahuan(1) 0.004 0.003
25
pengetahuan(2) 0.041 0.036
12.19512195
D.Teman 26.327 26.432 -0.398830098
D.Guru 3.661 4.321  
D.Orang Tua 2.185    
       

Terdapat perubahan OR >10% pada variabel pengetahuan sehingga variabel

dukungan orang tua adalah merupakan variabel confounding dan variiabel
dukungan orang tua dimasukkan kembali ke model multivariat.

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 12.711 2 .002
pengetahuan(1) -5.618 1.591 12.470 1 .000 .004 .000 .082
pengetahuan(2) -3.195 1.507 4.498 1 .034 .041 .002 .785
Step
D.Teman 3.271 .949 11.887 1 .001 26.327 4.101 168.985
1a
D.Guru 1.298 1.072 1.467 1 .226 3.661 .448 29.905
D.Ortu .782 .886 .779 1 .377 2.185 .385 12.403
Constant -6.312 2.874 4.824 1 .028 .002
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Guru, D.Ortu.

Pemodelan Tahap Keempat mengeluarkan variabel dukungan guru

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
 pengetahuan 13.245 2 .001
pengetahuan(1) -5.818 1.601 13.206 1 .000 .003 .000 .069
Step pengetahuan(2) -4.098 1.448 8.013 1 .005 .017 .001 .283
1a D.Teman 3.251 .912 12.700 1 .000 25.826 4.320 154.401
D.Ortu .998 .881 1.284 1 .257 2.712 .483 15.239
Constant -4.135 2.105 3.858 1 .050 .016
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Ortu.

Cek Perubahan Nilai OR

OR tdk ada Perubahan
variabel OR ada d.guru d.guru OR

pengetahuan      
pengetahuan(1) 0.004 0.003 25
0.017
pengetahuan(2) 0.041 58.53658537
25.826
D.Teman 26.327 1.902989327
D.Guru 3.661    

D.Ortu 2.185 2.712 -24.11899314

Terdapat perubahan OR >10% pada variabel pengetahuan dan d.ortu sehingga
variabel dukungan guru adalah merupakan variabel confounding dan dimasukkan
kembali ke model multivariat
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 12.711 2 .002
pengetahuan(1) -5.618 1.591 12.470 1 .000 .004 .000 .082
pengetahuan(2) -3.195 1.507 4.498 1 .034 .041 .002 .785
Step
D.Teman 3.271 .949 11.887 1 .001 26.327 4.101 168.985
1a
D.Ortu .782 .886 .779 1 .377 2.185 .385 12.403
D.Guru 1.298 1.072 1.467 1 .226 3.661 .448 29.905
Constant -6.312 2.874 4.824 1 .028 .002
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Guru.

Pemeriksaan Interaksi
Pengetahuan dan Dukungan Teman Sebaya
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
Step pengetahuan 4.751 2 .093
1a
pengetahuan(1) -.587 3.694 .025 1 .874 .556 .000 774.652
pengetahuan(2) -9.013 4.280 4.434 1 .035 .000 .000 .536
 D.Teman 2.177 1.902 1.309 1 .253 8.816 .212 366.782
D.Ortu 1.029 1.031 .995 1 .319 2.797 .371 21.116
D.Guru 2.645 1.394 3.600 1 .058 14.085 .916 216.492
D.Teman * 5.978 2 .050
norespon *
pengetahuan
D.Teman by -.012 .011 1.134 1 .287 .988 .967 1.010
norespon by
pengetahuan(1)
D.Teman by .013 .007 3.019 1 .082 1.013 .998 1.028
norespon by
pengetahuan(2)
Constant -7.689 4.193 3.363 1 .067 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Guru, D.Teman * norespon *
pengetahuan .

Tidak terdapat interaksi pengetahuan dan dukungan teman sebaya karena nilai
p.value > 0.05.
Pemodelan tahap Akhir

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower Upper
pengetahuan 12.711 2 .002
pengetahuan(1) -5.618 1.591 12.470 1 .000 .004 .000 .082
pengetahuan(2) -3.195 1.507 4.498 1 .034 .041 .002 .785
Step
D.Teman 3.271 .949 11.887 1 .001 26.327 4.101 168.985
1a
D.Ortu .782 .886 .779 1 .377 2.185 .385 12.403
D.Guru 1.298 1.072 1.467 1 .226 3.661 .448 29.905
Constant -6.312 2.874 4.824 1 .028 .002
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuan, D.Teman, D.Ortu, D.Guru.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 34.321 5 .000
Step 1 Block 34.321 5 .000
Model 34.321 5 .000

Model Summary
Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Square Square
1 43.705a .168 .492
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because
parameter estimates changed by less than .001.