Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S11201818 Lovely Dorothy Rachel Tukuafu Tonga Campus
S11201818 Lovely Dorothy Rachel Tukuafu Tonga Campus
Sustainable Cities
>>>>
- 105,319 - 16,300,000
This information resource covers most of the Topic’s features. The topic refers to the possible Bad
Limit Coverage examples and best practices of and for sustainable cities. However, it only has limit coverage
of the topic. This information resource does not fully cover the entire topic and information
Covers features of the Topic given, yet only short details to the topic. This affects the usefulness and quality of the
information resource for researchers to use since it only gives a few insight of the topic
searched for.
This information resource is highly supported with a bibliography listed with references of Neutral
Information not verified. different authors and related information to the topic researched. This gives good insights of
the topic and the abililty to know that there is other related information to support the topic.
Supported by bibliography However, the information is clearly not verified yet and to clarify yet to be verified. This can
information affect the quality of the information but it is still very useful.
This information resource only depicts the names of the author’s. However, the author’s Neutral
Author’s credentials not credentials or background is not mentioned. This decreases the quality of the information
mentioned resource because it is needed for researchers to know whether the author or editor’s
expertise is related to the field of the topic.However, it is just slightly decreases the
Authors names are mentioned. information resource’s usefulness as well.
This information resource is relevant to the topic searched. It also has an abstract to have an Good
Click or tap here to enter text. insight of what the topic addresses as well. This increases the topic’s quality and usefulness as
well for researchers to know that the information that they are searching for matches the
Topic is addressed. results and is related to the topic searched for.
This information resource shows the publilcation date yet only the year yet no updated date Neutral
No updated date mentioned. This gives doubt to whether the information can be used or not. The resource was
created in 2017 but still remains the fact that there is no updated dates. This slightly
Published date mentioned decreases the information resource’s quality and usefulness for research use.
The information resource that I would prefer to use would be the information resource number 1. This is
because it is a scholarly journal. First of all it is already both required a peer reviewed and depicts a full
abstract of the information resource which gives good insights of the resource to use. From evaluating
resource 1, it definitely addresses and covers the topic as well. It is also clarified with supported evidence
and references listed along with related information to use. Resource 2 is very suitable to use for research
use because it is reliable, verified and supported with various related information.