Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HistoryoftheBritishOccupationofIndia 10041670
HistoryoftheBritishOccupationofIndia 10041670
A . C S ARK AR
.
at the Pr a b as i P ress ,
Published by
9 1 U pp er C ircul ar R oa d
, , C al cutt a
CO N T E N T S
I ntroduction
Stru ggles o f di ff ere n t Christian
n atio n s f o r Supremacy
MG 4 0 4 2 1
Page
The Last Days o f Wellesley in India 1 39
’
Lord Cornwallis s Secon d A d mi n i s
t r a t i on
Sir George Barlo w
Lord M into
The M arques s o f Hastin gs
The Pindari War an d the Last of
t h e Peshwas 1 57
The War with th e B h o n s l e 1 65
The War with the H o lk a r 170
O ther M easures o f Hastings 172
Lord Amherst 1 74
Lord William B entin ck 1 80
The Ren ewal o f the Charter 1 8 33
, 1 87
Lord Aucklan d 1 91
Lord Ellenb or ough 1 95
Lord Harding e 2 07
Lord Dalhousi e 21 2
Acquisitions by Fr aud 223
The Indian M utiny o f 1 8 5 7 2 32
Transfer o f the Go v ernm ent o f
I ndia from the C ompany to t h e
Crown
Referen ces
IN T R O D U C T I O N
, ,
as a cl a ss n o sympathy
, f or I ndians Sir .
” 1
inhabitants a lo a thsome u n E n lish i ee e of can t
fi
-
.
“ ”
T n d a ll st 19 8 scien t ific i ma nation to discover
°
i
t f e mi s s m g Im ks O f course his t ory should be
.
,
m
,
“
of th ese ch ains of dangerous lies So me import .
u n i n flu e n c e d
by foreign ers deserve m ore attenti on
,
.
—
, ,
i r a t e s an d adventurers o f Brist ol h a d
j ealous o f the commer cial i mportance
an d as early as 1 5 2 7 Robert Thorn e
, ,
re c eived
“
i t s charter from the British Q ueen .
”
The S o c i e t y n L Ad x e n t ur e r s co n stituted into“ the
East I ndia Company resolved o n consultatio n not
W W
“
W
lest a grea num a ven u r e r s m Ig Wi thdraw
o
’
adventurers as a rule do n o t obser v e any code
, ,
“
first broke th e S ell which h eld the Euro c a n
”
in subj ection to the n ati ve po w ers The t w o i m .
by the F rench .
Surat an d f o u n d e d
w
con ciliatory policy o f r a n co i s M artin D r Len oir
an d M Dumas w h o su cceeded him took a world
.
,
by the ( W
“7 9 ,
. .
m
,
a r n a t i c wh o v isited it
, M Dum as went to
. .
8 HI S T ORY on THE -
BRITI SH O CCUP A TI ON OF IN D IA
fi D ifi l
“
“ ;
a o n e x
2
was wrecked His attempt to capture it f a iled ;
.
1
disgraced an d died in poverty Hi s successor M . .
S T RU GGLE S OF D IF F EREN T EU R OPEAN N AT I ON S 9
G od ehu c on c luded
peace by which th e t wo
’
“
,
i
,
” 1
ti n g an d popular mann ers M an y of th em adopted .
“
,
”6 '
m erchant every “
M u r a g e m e n t w a s o ff e r e d i The
”
author of Justi ce f o r In dia writes that t h e
In dian empire I s a creature of m i ght n ot of
It is the obj e c t of this b ook to n arr at e l
,
”
right .
F
Q
— ‘ in their capitals was the cause of their ruin ; f or
one o f the duties o f these o fficers was to foment
“
M S .
The system of subs i di a y
was d e S Ig n e d to wipe ou t the I ndepen dent
r allian ce .
w
.
was because B e n w
ted There was a so n o n avy in the East corres
.
” 12
than the m asti ti s
I
O
.
L
The C o n p a n y S suprem acy in Bengal an d Ii i d i a
’
‘ ” 15
avoided al l comm u nications with him They .
m
.
'
,
t e c t i on
M
.
Obe ye
back an d they
, seem to h a v e sent an Off ensi v e
“
reply th at.
the Ditch will be filled up with the
Zl heads oi M oors At about the same time a
l
,
.
,
6
, / property from c o n fis c a t I on , he sent his s o n Kissen
A, Das with all his m oveab l e we a lth to Fort William
j V'
.
w t
,
P o r t ug ese un n e r s g f th e Nawab
m
had been
'
e xhorte by rIfiéStIy adm oniti ons and c u rses t o
d es ert their master Ano t her mean de cision of .
’
a c companied that inhospitable attack O my Chaud s ,
“ “
A c rimin al e agerness w as m anifested by some
of t he m fi fi va n t s of th e C ompany to
14 HI S T ORY OF THE BRITI SH O CC U PA TI ON OF IN D I A
”17
l p
.
ro v ide for their o wn safety at any S a cr i fice
c
s ol d i e r s began t o draw bayonets on their O w n
“
,
” 3
”.
chronicles o f the time where it must have found
— ,
A
“£ DE Ce? if true Nor i s it mention ed in the
1
.
M
Proceedings B o ok of th e E ’
B h ol a n a t h C h un d en observed in 1 8 9 5 Captain .
' '
”
C alcutt a t h e Bla c k Hole an d F ort William
“
,
‘
by a c orresp o n dence with some of the prin cip al
people o f the an d askin g the Madras }
,
‘
d i rect to the Nawab letters O f an unmistakably
m threateni ng ch a racter M a n i ck C han d w a s soon
.
fi m
.
qf aw
f
p
f ‘
ra
. v'
ages
H e wrote
o f Bri t ish intrigue in his Court an d Camp
“
,
If the English who are settled in these
.
‘
t o their Chris ti an duty o f a c c o mm o d a t i n
x d l sput e .
’
But the in dispen sable c o n d I t i o n s
,
"
But the Treaty did n o t conclude the stru ggle .
m
Th e English disco v ered l o oph oles an d wo v e web s
with con summate hypocrisy Mr Watts th eir ”A . .
,
e n v oy at M urshidabad
«
like all his white ant brood , ,
c e n ce.
2
18 H I S T ORY OF T HE BRI T IS H O CCUP A TI ON OF IN D I A
W
.
Th a efl i m s e lfl So we fin d t h
y e ,
wise a n s w
, u ces It is n ecess a ry .
’
‘
attit ude because he (t he Nawab ) and all t h e
,
s
, ,
[
I bribed by O mi ch a n d for the English .
,
’
\
warrantable in such a case an d w ould do it a gain
”
a h undred tim es Within 3 0 days o f h is de
.
WM
‘
n i g ht M r
’
, . u s e in a dooley ,
"
.
,
wm
early in the d ay His c omman der i h chief M eer
‘
- -
.
’
/V W Jaff ar deserted him in his hour of n eed So as
’
.
,
t hou gh a decisi v e ,
” 32
can n e v er b e con sidered a gr eat loa tt le , Siraj .
m
- .
,
‘ “
him like a bl ast of II I hur ; he rema i ned f or
3 3 ’
”
S how s i gns O f i nsanity Cli v e ad v ised him .
, ,
of Riyaz u s S a l at
- -
n writes that t h e murder was c o m
a g a e . a a r w o , O
’ ”
Clive s Ass must have got the permission of O li v e
f o r the act The Eng lish never con demn ed t h e a c t
. .
wh
“
o amon g his en emi es was a paragon of v irtu e P
W h atever may b e his faults ”
says C ol M alleson
, . ,
his countr y He w a s t h e o n ly o n e o f th e
p rincipal a c tors in that tr a gi c dra ma wh o did n ot
”34
attem pt to de c eive .
Meer Jaff ar an d Hi s R ule
'
M eer J ah ar like all traitors was a miserable
, ,
»
u R a m Narai n t h e Go v,ern or o f Bihar was the ,
,
x M . Jean Law to proceed towards Plassey fro m
Patna but with t h e fall o f Siraj h e proclaimed
, ,
c
"T
M g o t e was sent in pursu i t o f M Law but .
s on , M e er a n as nominal Govern or an d
,
R am
Narai n as his Depu t y a n a rran gem ent by whi ch
—
O g u l s i n g h Govern or of P ur n e a h to ok up arm s IM
’
,
" ,
o
d An other chance f o r fleeci ng the Nawab n ow
r
a large force t o make good his c l ai m M eer .
g f
he ga v e Clive the j a ghire o f t he territory
.
M
,
gi
f t the j a ghir was extorte d from M eer J a ff ar by ’
v e .
T h Is m ethod
pleasi n g his fore i gn
r u 1n o u s of
friends made the Nawab v e ry unp opular with h i s
“
1 ta xpayi n g subj ects They beheld wi th detestation .
“
to r e cognise h i m as Nawab that it r e g ui r e d the
c ontinual good o ffic es o f O li v e to preserve term s
”
b etwixt M oreo v e r in the enquiry befor e
,
p
P
-
, ,
had n o hopes O .
,
w
.
f m fi
Th e English had n ow n o m 'z
4
opp ortunity
“
will soon o ccur h e wanted the C om
pany t o take th e sovereignty Of Beng al upon
”
themselves f o r M eer J a h ar was Old an d his
‘
s on
“ “
”
so cruel and worthless He said that a s mall
.
)
of a rebellion against Meer Ja tf a r s weak r ule led ’
A !
"
J
chiefs I t was feared that C ud d a m Ho os s e i n
.
,
£ k
9
1,
legality of a C ompan y Of m erchan t s fighting against
'
the Emperor s depu t y in 1 7 5 9 the r e c a n “be n o ,
j 7 4 0 h i m w as undis ui s e d rebellion
”
Agai n the young
h
. ,
M eera h ha d on t he e v i d e ng e f fl n si t t an
“
fi
e g un , .
m eo
w The English c ould n ot with
an y s ow o f de c en cy expect any thing m ore fro m
him S O they plan n ed to kick h im off an d hoist ( "
.
l
C a l i a u d was at first a gainst the s o
“
in such a c ase i t is very p ossi b le we may rais e
a man to the dignity just a s u nfit t o govern a s
, ,
‘
1 5 th Sep 1 7 60 the great Obj ect was said t o b e
’
.
“
the s e c uri ng Of a fund of m on ey for the present
an d fut ure exigencies of this settlemen t as well a s ,
”
ed fro m Europe .
mi t t e e
. Accordingly M r V ansittart reported that
.
general Of the
N o w that thei r plan s h a d m a t u r e d t h e Engli sh
'
, ,
“
S O the English conspira
”
his greatest e n e mI e s
t om
.
,
Surely C ortez a n
,
n ot guilty O f
base a treachery wh en th ey arrested M ontezum a
an d the Inc a A t h a hu a lpa f o r t he y Off ered the Inca
,
“ ” “
Torren s in h i s E mpire i n Asia writes : The i h
e q u i t y O f th is transa c tio n fi n ds few ap ol ogist s even
30 HI ST ORY O F T HE BRI T I SH O CCUPA TI ON or IN D I A
.
,
, .
2 000 7 a m ont h
—
Sti ll M aj or Carnac proceeded t o
.
,
m acy h a s n o t
b
been s ufficientl y re c ognised
A re v olution at Delhi
[b etween M uslim
I n dia from being re con v erted into a Hindu
save
.
,
'
Bp y ;
s s they.
f ?
were j oin ed by the troops O Bhur pore the ,
”
c apri cious an d s elf c on ceited-
conduct that
a l ienated t h e sym pathi es Of his a llies I n the .
W i h3
‘
a 0 -
I .
,
two n at i ons w h o were i n the fie l o r wresting
Sydn ey O w writes W I t h e,
a t t l e o f a n i pa t t
,
TO
r etur n to our narrative
‘
c api t al .
m easures of th e tr e a c herous p o l i ey o f Mr ” M
.
3
34 HI S T ORY OF T HE B RITI S H O CC U PA TI ON or IN D I A
(
”
é English ) factory M any yo ng writers a c cord
;
! u ,
- A
“
as a grand sourc e Of disputes misunderstanding
“
s ,
”
and diffic ulties and want ed that a final a n d
”
e fle cti v e end should be put to i t / This order
‘
5 6 ,
“
1 s h ort a s Burke put it the miserable c ount ry
“4 5
p M
4 — , ,
, .
“ "
length O f s ayi n g The E n glish E I C ompany
, . .
M EIE R CA SS IM A ND HIS R UL E
W
,
”
or inlan d tr ade Mr
. V a nsitt art w a s
. 08
“
si n c e a c cordi ng t o M aj or C arn a c
, hi s c es ,
w
.
fé
4 ,
2 4“
C orr es on d e n c e c onta i n s m an y etters b e t we e n
Heer Cassim an d t h e Govern or an d s o reveal m“an y
phases of the str uggle We kn ow from it that t h e.
\
ami c ably He wrote sin c ere letters explaining hi s
.
a supply o f arms in a fl ot il l zf o f
'
boats w a s sent
"
,
Patn a an d
r o u ht M r E 111 8 an d o t h ers c apt i ves t o M onghyr
, ,
,
ME IER CA S S IM AN D HIS R UL E
'
“
Meer Cassim replied : Y o u gentle m e n w e r e w o n d er
W H a v i n g m ade a treaty to whi c h y ou
p l edge d the n ame o f Je sus Christ y ou to ok from
me a country t o pay the ex pe nses of y o ur arm y
‘
ed by Meer C as sim ,
<
g
,
were m a d e of a I r a ble m et al an d wi t h fli n t s ’
“
‘ '
. ,
several
causes for the defeat of th e I ndian army O ne .
” 65
chiefs an d sen d them t o y on O f co ur s e the
.
,
~
o rdered a ll the Christians in hi s servi c e an d
al n d e r c a ptivity to b e exe c uted The tas k of .
a n d c o r ruption .
V1 “
'
'P C a w n
W a h a d ur , to as si st him i n defeating th e
'
I
C
desig ns o f the sai d Cassim All e e C a wn a n d finally
”
establishing himself in the S uba h d ar e e He nc e
'
.
,
'
by restoring M eer Jafia r the English in a way ,
w
.
W
‘
s o that I c ould n ot have the m in case I should
” want them for myself m famil y and dependants ’
y
.
, ,
, r
{
’
w a s still in Al l ahabad un der Shah Sh u j a s pr o t e c U s
t i on
. T he V i z ier took a s olem n o at h on the Koran
th at he would espouse Meer C ass im 8 c a use but ’
, ,
gratitude O f
W C a s s i m pr oc ee d e
-
!
a S te mber 1 5 1 7 64 and the Vizier was defeated wit h
,
‘
En glish demanded from Shah Shuj a the s urrender
o f M eer Cassim but both the b i rds
‘
m ar c h ed on to A llaha b ad ,
F ortunately for them .
,
es ,
e sub mitt e d to Maj or C arn a c a n d
t hr ough the me d i a
°
Of Ra j a Shita b
pea c e was c on clu e y w c uj a w as 4 N
, 2
c ompelled to pay the English 5 0 lakh s of r upees
to a
J / ,
an d to c ed e th e
f air l a st clause w as
n ot of D ire c tors sinc e ,
wi t h the En glish .
Muslim n or a C h i rs t i a n It w a s N a n d kumar t h e .
,
f aithful servan t .
E vents i n B t mg al af ter Meer Jaff ar Death
’
s
during t he term of o fli ce O f Mr S pe n c er th at M e er
'
.
”
m an y resign ed the servi ce a n d , re t urn in g h o me ,
1M
s t art ed an agitation against Cli v e hi ms elf .
W
“ ”
in his o wn w or d s the A , N e 8 0 , s oo n .
“
after his arrival h e wr ote 0 I s employers a b out
,
”
the u n w a r r a n t a b le a c q ui s i t i o n o f ri ch es whi c h had
‘
introd uc ed l
“
in its m ost
” “
pernic ious ex c ess T here
. w as n othing t hat
”
b ore the for m o f government “
The arm y s howed .
fil
W /
,
“
LE l phi n s t on e admits t h at there ar e f e w t ransac ti ons '
46 HI ST O RY OE T HE B RITI SH O CC UP A TI ON OF IN D IA
W
”
8 treaty The author Of the Seir say s
. .
K han —
acting un der him and the Presidency
i n c onj un c t ion though th e revenues will belong
, ,
’
Clive s s cheme was n ot
administr ation O f
the lan d for native Officers were cheaper an d
,
"
Reza Khan strongly an d V e r e l s t mentions a rumour
L current in Calcutta that it w a s the result Of foul
K Nor was Clive a
1 play on the part Of Cli ve 75
.
E nglish ra c e .
7 6 .
“
c ul ated f or pre
s ent applause rather than f o r perman en t a d v a n 77
A fter feathering his own n est an d that O f
h i s c ountrymen Lord Clive left In dia f or good i n
1 7 67 .
,
Of his e v e r a l crim es .
7 2
. .
, ,
"
/
make room in 1 7 7 2 to Warre n Hastings Durin g .
W
double y oke imposed by
i sh tr aders — The om pa n y s factors
.
“
a .
our} ;
48 H I S T O RY O F T HE B RITI S H OC C U PATI ON O F I ND I A
”
w hi c h produ c es li ttle gold a n d n o silver The .
tU n f or t u n a t e l
y at su c h a ju n ct ure a drought also
, ,
a gents ,
who stored u p ri c e in order to m ake an
un holy profit out O f the mise r ies of th e people .
T hus in B e n gal
, , th e c hang e Of m a ste r s w a s n ot
f ortunate f or the land .
T he A d mi ni s tr ati on O f Warren Has ti n g s
\
taken suc h pains to attack him f or he eloquently ,
“
aske d . Has h e enlarged the b oun dary O f our
G o v ern ment ? N o ; there are but t o o strong
proofs Of his lessenin g But Warren
Hastings did the great work Of consoli d ating the
E m fir e which Clive had formed by forgery an d
"
fraud .
! ‘
4
5
” “ u
m a t i c a lly l oya an d wh olly occupie d in thoughts
Of keepin g the in dividuals Of that n ation in good
”81
h um our , Warren Hastin gs a rrested them o n
trumped up charges an d after recei v i n g large
,
w
, .
n ot reinstated while S h i t w , fi a A
broken heart N O successor was a ppO In e O t tIe
“
.
W
.
,
W
,
m any birds d i s s w w —
m of
G overnm ent dam a ged N a n d k um a r s reputati o n got
’
, ,
.
50 HI S T ORY OF T HE B R I TI S H O CCU PA TI ON OF IN D I A
uA g d ten lakh s an ’
d even more Again Hastings .
,
C t t w
r e m o v e d the Ci v il and Cri min al C ourts to Calcutta .
e spoke o n the
“
forlorn Empe r or But th e calls O f
.
” 82
the heavy attra c tion O f gold turne d
t h e bal ance .
is n o
W “ ,
. .
.
,
M
oth er instan ce O f a ci v ilised po w er entering i nto a
Vfl
l war with the avowed Obj ect O f destroying a p e o pl e
with which it had n o 0
Next y e ar Warren Hastings was made Go v ernor
,
, ,
;
Chve !
Hastings c ould n ow breat he freely thanks to —
’
b r ea c h Of faith his deposition o f Z emindars
-
”
q u e r o r s put upon the necks Of c on q uered n ations .
“
in his Empire in Asia h o w we came by i t z—
.
”
B O O k Of Confessions a c he a p r epri n t O f W EI c h
-
is n o w available .
The Ri s e O f t he Marat has an d t he
Fi rs t Marat ha War
‘
united the M arathas f o r a hi g her pu rpose Ab o v e .
’
all ,
e was intensely re i g i o u s being a v ery ,
“ ”
his life in his Ris e Of the M a r Pow r .
, ,
3 C
'
S hi v aj i
, nicknam ed Sa b oo was rendered idioti c ,
,
a
Bal ji J a n a r d a n Bhanu alias N an a Fa d n a v i s
was a high class n oblem an While y et in his .
T HE RI S E O F T HE M ARATH AS
Q , 2 c I“
,
— .
1
c al embra c e Of th e En glish a n d was steadily
’
O f r M o s t y n s representati o n s disputed th e
.
’
,
“
had
written t o B ombay as early as 17 6 8 : We r e c o m
m en d to y o u in the stron gest mann er to use your
, ,
”
a n ce Of R a g h ob a against all his en emies Th e .
o tion
tc Of the Gaekwar compelled Hari Pant to re
1 ’
tt
.
s
A pr o on g e d w ar of s u c c e s s I o n e ween four
brothers w a s ruining the lan d when R a g h ob a fled
113 »
W .
»
,
gan he t o o insisted on W
,
U His .
, ,
‘
most Of the proposals O f the Supreme C ommittee 7 .
w
appealed to the C ourt Of Directors wh o with the l
true b u Si n e s s fi n s t i n ct s u p o t s d t h s mor s pr ofit (f
, ,
fir
-
W t S .M ostyn was on c e
m ore sele c ted for Poona in S pite of th e opposition ,
f
.
“
wfii vis and su c h like What poor p ygmies we are .
"
,
“
though os t ensibly directed against Fren ch
I
“ des
H U ? a r a t ha power 0 he dro v e aw ay S t L u bi n f rom
W
'
”
the es ast were aimed at the ,
.
, . .
’
glorious name in the annals O f his c ountry s
history though Clive an d Hastings whose work
—
'
,
many ways .
Sindhi a .
T HE RI SE O F T HE M ARATHAS
C ol Leslie w as opposed i n hi s m ar c h b y t h e
.
-
"
,
A»
Govern or o f M alwa invaded the D e cc an the
, ,
M udia an d co H ol k a r R a n O I was a !
“
that his illegitimacy caus e d him to con c ei v e a .
41
hi s t erritory an d ravaged it from end to end .
“ 1 u
1 a n d the person o f R a g h o b a were essenti al preliminar
(V
ies to any treaty n egotiation s So Goddard with t h e .
, ,
V‘
the Nizam Hyder , Nawab Of Arcot an d
even the Emperor O f Delh i He told the latter .
,
T HE R I SE O F TH E M ARA T HAS
“
The ways O f the E uropeans are unfair an d wily .
"
,
m KM y s o r e an d died in 1 61 8 , 16 7
lea v ing four sons th e youngest of whom wa s the
,
:"
’
c a pt u R kept hi m in an iron
cage Hen c eforth the R a j a was a o n enti
.
,
in -
master o f t h e kingdom .
m
.
H y d e r s Commander
’
Fazl u lla khan easily recap
,
- -
“
.
a n d a h alf h e co v ered
b .
/
64 HI S T O R Y OP THE BRITI SH O CCUPA TI O N O F IN D I A
, ,
) an d C 0 1
Wite from P ond ig h e r r y t o
I
l
(
V
.
‘
p r o c e e d towards a d r a s With h i s
. l arge force
an d superior tactics and the able genera lship n o t
“
.
,
HY D ER ALI
"
s o it happen ed that Hyder c ommitted a mistake A .
7
.
end t
o the M arath a W a
. r Sir Eyre C oote dre w a
pict ure in e ar ke s t colours n ot only o f the
,
f
an d Krishn a Rao to the h igh l
"
Hin dus like Purn
m
p osts in the administration an ad never any p
:
66 HI S T O R Y OF THE BRITI SH O CCUPA TI ON OF IN D I A
s o v e r e i gn an d h i s co u n try an d h i s rise w a s d u e
to treac h ery i n t r i gu e a n d c u n nin g After t h e
,
.
k i n g m a kers
-
s i n cerely d es i ro u s l i ke Cromwell
, , ,
som e cr i m e C h in K il i c h K h a n w a s depri v ed Of
,
-
hi s Office a n d s o h e co n spired a ga i n st t h e a s ce n
d a n cy Of t h e S a i d s O n a ccount Of t h e p ower of
‘
Govern or o f Mal w a in 1 7 20 , .
“
A t th i s b e resol v ed t o display openly the stan d
” 89
ard of revolt an d in th e w a r that ensued ,
68 HI S T O RY OF T HE BR ITI SH O CC UPA TI O N OE IN D I A
“
S eir says : Raj a G i r i d h a r (V iceroy Of M alwa) would
n ot s uf f e r his country to b e ravaged ; an d bein g
an O f ficer o f ch aracter h e engaged B aj l R a o ,
Niz a m -
ul -
m u lk is als o suspecte d Of h avi n g A LL
hah t o invade H i n d u s t a n ,
t
troops
th e assista n ce Of th e Emperor a n d h i s lo y al n oble s
d
V i
l ke S aad
w an A S soon as Nadir S h a h return ed t o
.
I1 u 6
‘
w a s busy in stre n gtheni n g h i s p o w er in the D eccan
'
W
.
t r a r y it materially
, co n tributed to t h e growth of
t h e British po w er in I ndia not only by m eans of
i ntrigu es but by furnishing assistance in money
a n d m en Sir
. Henry Lawren ce says that it was
“
periodically u sed as a wet nurse to relie v e the -
o f V izier S u f d e r Jung
,
was made Nawab Vizier
and he sustained for som e tim e t h e tottering
a uthority o f the King o f Delhi S u f d e r died in
.
1 7 86 —
1 7 93 .
He w a s an I rish m an a n d ca m e to In di a t o
r e t r i e v e a blasted re putation He h ad surren dered at
.
‘
ted the treaty concluded with Tip u in 1 7 8 4 an d
‘d
/
b l in a treaty with the Niza m went to the length of
omitting Tipu s name S ignificantly in a list of the
’
this treaty
Since by the
was rec ognised as a n ally
C or n w allis was guilty o f bad
faith an d disobedien ce o f Acts o f Parliam ent .
r i t i es
, though they pale into i n s i g n i fic a n c e in
comparison with the cruelties o f Europeans .
«
h e b ooty .
f or war an d Mr Holland
. ex Go v ern or of,
-
“
M adras that he had n o intention to break with
,
M e ad u y an insulting reply
an d com men ced operation s But Tip u s oon A
.
“
w a s captured by assault an d a d e pl o r a bl arna e
of its inmates perpetrated S .
as
e i t e s the feelings O f the English resembled
.
T ipu
, he would never have troubled himself
H I S T O RY
\
76 OF T HE BRITI SH O CC U PA TI ON or IN DIA
M
‘
He treated the Act with
/
.
in a state o f dreary s t a g n a t i o n fiQ fij o r n on e b ut t he ’
any law .
” ‘
tu de or of high pri n ci ples or of pacific i n t e n ’
’
t io ns i s on e o f those falsehoods whi c h unfortun ately
a b ound i n the pages of In dian history written b y
t h e Englis h .
S i r John S hor e
In 1 7 9 3
’
the Company s charter was renewe d
,
o re s
—
, ,
m
, ,
m ore probably s el i M a d h oj i s
’
grace or by a o an ge in th e Peshwaship O n th e .
Rao c o mm i u
i i d e by throwin g him self down
f
from th e terrace 0 his p al ace fr acturing t w o of ,
"
,
M d ho d i aL i n F e b ru ary
- 1 7 94 an d was ,
~
S u cce e ed by Daulat Rao w h o was v ery ambitious ,
:
.
a gift fro m }
“ ”
dependency on t he English x
7 ,
.
,
t h e C ompany
”
whate v er its relation s under 5
,
”
t reaties may be ! T h e subsidy O f fifty lakhs was
p aid by t h e Vizier pun ctually an d without c om
plaint but Sir Joh n Shore c ompelled him b y
,
96 1 M
m i nister M ahar a j ah M all and
guiltless o f an y crime kept him as a state pri
a l t h ou g h
g ,
S on e r
. Asaf u d daula took these s o mu c h to heart
- -
9
“ ”
There is n “o cure for a broken heart l eaving the ,
f or fi f
mv f
Allaha bad and Fut t y G ur h wit h eleven
lak s O rupees or e cost of repairing the m t o
51 W ,
if “
in crease the annual subsidy fro m fif t y six to
se v enty six lakhs to pay a ll expenses of m o v i n g
-
,
-
7 '
frien d Of Gr a tt a n I n 1 7 8 4 he cam e o v er t o
. .
O n c e be e n ,
O ff e r e r e d t h e G o v ern orshi p o f M adras
an d w h o w a s o n e O f his few intimate frien ds
“
.
i n lo v e made the hi m
v ictim of mor bid
He broug h t out his brother Henry
Fr a n k o ph o b i a .
O ff to I n dia as a t e nM a d e t at 1 2 S in ce h e was ,
.
, ,
S ion . C o u ntries
were n o t ostensibly con quered ;
t h e so v ereig n w a s allo w ed to remai n o n his thro n e ,
W
“
a letter dated ,
8 m a r ked Secre t , ,
o fii ce r e d by t h e F r enc h w it h t h e C o m pa n y s t r oo ps
’
T ip u i n the e v e n t m e w a r w it h M ysore
M /
T his .
W L4 ,
L f C om an ‘
Arthur Wellesley wrote to M aj or
,
S
p f y .
“
S ha w e i n 1 8 03 Y ou will h a v e Obser v ed from my
w
,
l etters to C 0 1 C lOs e t . w ,
”
s er v i ng His Hi ghn es s .
“
u
from the commen cem ent of his ru le After an .
“
all his a cti v ity to repair the r a :a g e s o f war He
‘
”
restored to its former p r o s pe r i t fi z
He h a d n o
.
to him .
“
an amica ble S ettlement of the question on account .
w
Nelson in t h e B a t t l e o f t h e N i le and so there was n o »
chan ce o f th eir helping Tipu in any way Wit h .
‘
,
q 1
his r r l v al h fou nd a letter from Tip
u
On a e ,
“
{
” 1 23
tion of w a r (1 measures of self d e f e n
M
-
He swore that
the B ritish But the British Go v ern or General
.
-
"
d f o r peace o n t h e 1 3 th
M “ F ebruary and san ctioned M a j or Do v e t o n s mission ’
.
m
.
, ,
-
.
T HE W AR WIT H TI P U
A Pn r n 1 y a resembling
-
,
l le ran d in m any respects) ,
the D iwan .
,
.
d
.
‘
a
-
conspiracy wit h Fran ce was pr e po s t e r ou s 1
‘
n onsense .
”
" began what h e called his r ef orm which —
me a nt
M
t h e disban dment o f a large p ortion Of the Nawab s
’
ca v a lry Th e Ob e t was t o e x t i n g ui s hJ he fl a wa b s
.
’
51
'
“
a g u ilt w hich h a r d ly an y p u n i s h m e n t can e x p i a te .
as i mp e a c hi n g th e h o n our a n d j u st i ce o f h i s
th i s li n e t h e Go v ern or G e n eral pe r e mp
,
-
“
obj ect was the s ole administration o f the ci
a n d military govern ment o f all th e territories a
depen dencies o f the state o f O ude together
the f ull and entire right an d title to the reve
t hereof ; but for s ome reason or other he left ,
rem o v ed .
pace with
a ct c r u “
3
of C n o r m
i a
U ni v e r s i t y a
94 HI S T OR Y OF T HE B R ITI SH OCC UPA TI ON OF I N D IA
to a n on Christia n pri n ce f e ll fla t u p o n t h e e a rs
-
.
”
Heath a Trea ty ! The M arquess s greatest s u p por
,
’
wh o were in Parliament an d th e ex C h i ef ,
-
”
o f the Lord Lieuten ant of I reland and e v en
ded t h e authority of the C ourt o f Direc t ors f or
the acts Of Wellesley But as Sir Thomas Turton .
“
said : How then Sir must th e H ouse hav e b e en , ,
4
appointed
”
Y et
. i n N o v ember 1 8 01 W ellesley
, , ,
.
Wellesley an d t he Carn at i c
»
The Go v ern or General so o n di sco v ered th at the
-
/
if
i f u l O mrah intrigued with the t w o v a k eels G holam
f
-
l
f 11 and Ali Reza wh o had gon e to M adras w i th the
N w sons f Tipu to be d liver d up as h ostages
” o o e e
U
.
:
W ELL E SLE Y A ND T HE
'‘
C A R N A I IC
” “
thir t y years-
with their d i s c o mfit e d foe against
,
, ,
“
ed them the most authentic an d indi sputable
e viden ce .
.
July 1 8 01 and a series o f disgraceful tran sactions 18 ”
, ,
.
,
on a char e o f treachery ”
preferred
e“ 1
r ,
’
S ome partisan of Wellesley quoted D oma t s Com
”
pe n d i u m o f Ci v i l an d Public Law to prove that
a prince was boun d not only by the engagement s
o f his predecessor but to repair the damage c reated
98 HI S T ORY O F T HE B R ITI SH OCC UPA TI ON or INDI A
’
by predecessor s crimes
111 8
“
M r Sheridan retorted . .
PM .
R
W
.
mn g
(” h a that d disgrace
w on em w W
c on demned the p ol l c y of the Com pany
hen i t y
n et
5 W P M b V e n k oj i
, ,
t o k
,
his cuttin g O ff this settlem ent from i t s p r oper plac e
“
in the uni t ed M arath a ki n gdom Tanj ore suff ered
w
,
h g r i e v o u s l yg fi? I n 1 7 4 2 Pratap Si n
, gh beca m e th e
R a j a of Tanj ore and he was ackn owl e d ged by the
6
,
(
E n glish East I ndia Company f or m ore than seve n ;
”
ed the off er They determine d however
. as , ,
M alcol m sa y s
'
that t h e c a pture o f De v i kot t a h
, ,
"
army un der M a n k oj i pl ayed an importan t part on
?
the side o f t h e E n glish a gain st the i
f ” ) I
,
becam e th e ruler In 1 7 9 3 a n e w
.
,
‘4
treaty was co n clu ded w ith him by whi ch a large 7, .
5
gues wi th S a r b oj i thro u gh hi sM D Re v M r ” , “ . .
S wft s Am ar Si n gh o f cruelly 0
m e r eIy a puppet
’
th at h e was resolved n
deen in the Sta tion O f sh all have
agre e d to transfer the w hole c ivil an d military
adm inistrati on an d revenues O f the city into the
han ds of th e Com pany reservin g t o himself an ,
1 02 HI S T ORY OF T HE B RITI SH OCC UPA T ION OF I ND I A
As a writer
“
in the C a lcu t t a R e v i ew for June 1 8 48 , ,
t he Peshwas w a s ,
r u ling i n Po o n a wit h the help 0 7
a n d s u pport of D o wlat R ao Si n d h ia Nana Fa d n a v i s IN .
L IL . ,
s
Pesh w a that t h e S i y
P
”
er a n d that he was a a n e r o us gally s in ce he
ke pt French O f ficers wh o were sure to attract
E n glis h rese n t me n t F ort unately these plans were
.
,
as A i /
a
1“
in l i it elf an d C olonel C oll s was despat c hed
‘
r
a o r s n “
authority i n H i n d u s t a n w
Lord M ornington
'
j I ntri gues
. were also carr
” o n W i t h t he
Ed a O f B erar by Colebrooke t h e ,
J great O r i e n t a h s t
,
Hin dustan .
p a n y s
’
t r o o p s in the c a mpaign a gainst Tipu but alm ost ,
.
.
,
m
dream o f the M arath as to regain their supremacy q
in In dia .
"
,
m
,
A rt hur W e ll e s l e
M
“
[
.
disord e r W i th oj e e B o lk a r brother of Y e s w a n t
.
, ,
”
crisis o f aff airs w rote Lord Wellesley t o the
,
“
C ourt of Directors appeared t o m e t o a ff ord the
,
“ ”
I mminent an d certain destr u ction n ow stared
the Peshwa in the face He rememb ered a pro mise
.
“
himself
-
had
written but five years back O f the imbecility of hi s
C oun cils the instability an d treachery of his
,
Lake a W um
“ ”
,
an £ 4 accordi n g to W T . ..
- -
.
w
the South to encourage t h er n J i r d a r s to
declare in favour of the Peshwa s cause an d t
“ ’
“
e stablish in Poon a an order of things favourable
to t h e return o f th e Amrut Rao the 9 ,
” ” V 1 J
a ggressors t hemselves .
M
wa Justice an d p olicy deman d
.
w l
i l“ D aulat Rao Sindhi a was thoro u ghly alarme d at
t urn of events Hi s tro ops h a d been defeat
.
S i n d h i a s court
’
p o v ok e d hi m into an ger by a n
,
t
a e
so v ereign s from m e eti n g an d discu ssi n g m eas u res
A c a lculated t o secure their o wn welfare C olonel
T HE T REA T Y OF BASSEI N
an d W A d am .
146
b e d elegated to his brother th e
p ower to d eclare w a r or co n clude p e a ce as cir
c u m s t a n c e s an d his m ilit a ry position w ould dictate .
”
m ade friendly profession s to him during an
i nterview the bl ood thirsty Resident interpreted
,
-
"
.
out t o
“
h i m to continue in peace with the C om 1 Al a L fl t
-
-
, ,
a ,
f
his de tion n u er th e k) e 1i e f that the Britis h
w o uld dfi ,
W
’
H ol k a r s c hi e f was shaken as ,
8
1 14 HI S T ORY or T HE B RITI SH O CCU PA TI ON or IN D I A
v -
W e ha v e seen h ow
"
acting under Warren
fl
,
éf
é
'
w ,
fig 5
.
h e succe e d ed e v e n be y on d his o w n e x p e c a
f or
A gain
th e s e tr a itors co n sidered Old as t h eir G o d
on e B a mboo K han half Been d epri v e d o f
w ,
.
,
L
t h e Sah a ranpur D i stri ct by t h e Sin d hia an d h e
,
B r oach.
t .
“
to C olonel Close resident at Poona O f a pro
, ,
”
portion of the re v en ue t o b e gi v en to the Peshwa “
,
‘
but on the 1 4t h he hastened
, to write that it
would b e b etter n ot to hold out any “
promise or
”
1 prospect . O n t h e 1 7 th he wrote I f the Pesh w a
,
”
gi v en up the tradition a l but formi d able m etho d s A
o f M a rath a war fare an d
He had als 3
‘
A ssaye
“
. m ention
sixteen Of their European Officers an d sergeants
”
comi n g over and Gen eral Wellesley felt satisfied
on findin g at all events their European o f ficers
,
’ L
h ave left them
‘
”
Ea c h of these m ust have g ot j
.
4
the pay m ention ed in His Ex cellen cy s proclam a
’ ’
B e g u m Su e
’
tion o f t h e 29 1h A u g ust 1 803 , .
O s
/
I ,
was anxious f or war did n ot len d any ear t o his
,
0
ers General .
‘
1 18 HI S TO R Y OF THE B RITI SH OCC UPATI ON or IND IA
M .
[ to fike ad v anta ge o f t hl s c hance by sen ding Steven
and w r in sistiu upon pea Th e British tried
“
himself said ,
The Raj a O f B e r a r s troops are n ot ’
;
.
;f Mt
5
p ga n z e r a .
expelling certain
C hieftains wh o though tributary to the Peshwa
, , ,
m
.
the Sindhi a in t h e
k
ag ai n s t
n orth were under Gen eral Lake
, U n der the .
”
O n th e 2 9 th August 1 803 Lake occupied C Qe l ,
o n t 9 12 9
'
I
m any a dastardly t rai t or in th e S i n d h i a s Ca m p
’
.
Gen
“
eral Lake w rote to Wellesley o n the M t
Six O ffi cers Of Perron s secon d brigade are j ust
’
“
proposed to capture A li g h u r ; m y Obj ect is to get z fl
5
’
,
“
,
‘M “
als o left th e service Of Sin dhia f or t h e t r e a c h e r y a n d ,
W e d hi m
a result O Shah A lum s steps to corrupt the troops
O f his en emies Lake
’
probably as
n o w entere d Del h i a n d we n t
,
3
?
.
"
,
“
b e c ause as he wrote We ha v e g ot such a hold in his
, ,
,
”
is n ot secure ! The Sindhia was also once m ore
induced to employ foreigners in his army like
Jean
“
Baptiste N O wonder therefore that
, ,
\
Rao B ol har did n ot j oin the c o n f e d e
Je s w a n t
r ates against the British b e c ause General , '
E
the ICt h lu ly 1 803 held out hopes of an a mple
, ,
,
.
‘ ’
j ustice an d disco v ered a flaw in the claim of the
1
“
H olk a r to the thron e He tal ked O f adopting ),
.
f
mi s e ‘ V n
x
. The Go v ern or G eneral s oun ded a distin ct -
’
“
ing attitude f o r he wrote t o the M arquess I ne v er
,
.
W
ll 11 April l 6 t h 4 the Go v ern or General
it ,
-
a ,
f or v a ious reasons
r
He was in dignant a t h i s
.
,
”
t w o h owitzers an d o n e 6 pounder inflicting hea v y
,
-
”
which this unfortun ate bus i n ess inflicted on t he
English were to be wiped o u t at any cost T h e .
”
and the predatory chiefs c onnected with him .
“
Three ar mies took the fie ld Ge n eral Lake in —
"
t hese fraud and intrigues
, .
”
-
O f a peer an d was therefore a fa v oured child
, ,
W W t
. .
i “
o f n epotism O n the 1 s t of July M onson e n t e r e d V
f f
‘
-
.
,
H o l k a r s dominions through th e M u c u n d r a p a s s
’
i
w as imp risoned A mir Khan i n his me moi r s
.
,
“ '
was m ost criti cal Lake called the retreat t h i s c
.
’
,
“
T h e Governor Gen eral wro t e to Lake : I fear m y
-
su c cess , M onson
discovered a secre t corres
p o n d e n c e bet w ee n the H o l k a r and t h e Jat
Raj a R u n j e e t Sing h of B h ur t p or e a n ally ,
'
fli g a t e an d in digent contrivers of t he o r ig i n al
”
plot an d three months later he asked Lake t o
, ,
The Ho l k a r at t he worst wa s me r el y
'
, ,
‘
th at h e h a d ren oun ced all claims to Gwalior a n d ’
.
w h en t h e H ol ka r c a ptured M u n d a s o or an d Amir
’
Kh a n in v ested Bhilsa He explain ed M onson s
.
u
,
d ifficulties h e sa i d
, i n d u ced B a pu j e e to seek
,
h i s troops an d m o v i n g from B u r h a n po r e as a ,
”
result of t h e d elay an d evasi on s in every point
an d m an y violation s o f treaty stipulation s The .
was
“
a past m aster i n th a t art an d so he replied ,
“
Bapt i ste Lake wrote Jean Baptiste would
o
.
,
Le bi
) 1 t h e n u n de r t h e co m m a n d of O c h t e r lo n y
L
_ , ,
/ '
t
’
b ought v ictory a t Deeg an d secured H o l ka r s
i f “
?
“
o rd n ance . The g r e a t a n d gloriou s v i ctory gai ned w ”
” “
a t D eeg ap peared to L a ke to sur pa ss any t hing
” “
that has hith erto bee n done i n In d i a The ra pidi t y
/
.
” “
o f my march (2 3 miles a day ! ) ha s a s t o n i s n e d J
all the nati v es beyond i magin atio n and made the m
”
thin k th ere i s n ot h ing we a r e n ot e q ual to The .
“
pleasing se n ti me n ts No g r e ti tfia i fll el hfis hfl e nj
g y
.
— —
, .
Ge n e r al L a ke
”
.
p
,
)
wh o had been empo w e r ed to decide for the co n cl u
s io n of peace or t h e co n tinuation of w a r under ,
f ’ ,
“
depress ed a n d con cern ed He wrote I fear that
A
.
,
w e h ave despised t h e p l a ce a n d en e my SO mu ch
”
a s to re n der both fo r mi d able Therefore i ntri gu e s
.
,
p o werless by t h e defe c ti on o f Je a n B a pt i s t e
t
a
Filos e .
’
1 38 HI S T O RY OF T HE B R ITI SH O CC U PA TI ON OF IN D IA
Parliament o f Engla n d .
T he L as t Days of Welles ley i n In d i a
s oon
.
. The Directors were alarmed at the huge
d ebt created by his wars Dividen ds began t o
.
”
m ent . C orn w allis p ointed out an other caus e for
dissatisfaction in the fact that he di d n ot secure
the concurre n ce o f hi s C ouncil b efore th e c o m
m e n c e m e n t o f h ostilit i es T h e C ourt Of Directors
.
, .
,
“ ’
p r g a ni sed
. The Treasury w a s empty Lake s army .
,
“
tion s an d to tra nsmit a plan o f operation s f or
” “
th e even t ual prosec u tion of h ostilitie s at th e
”
earliest practi c able peri od of tim e But five d“ay s . .
“
f a st letter w a s o n e of regret a n d co n cern at t he
” “
a tt i tude taken by th a t truculen t r u f fia n especi a lly ,
'
“
A c c ording to M a l c ol mflél his policy w a s a ,
Commander in
Chief an d both these rode rough sho rt
’
- - -
“
n o t to mark hi s face t o denote his caste or wear ,
w h o w a s re c alled.
L or d Mi nto
t w o fa c tions
—
the M aratha and the Pathan and ,
z
’
.
l .
W
'
”
forei gn poli c y it deserves greater attenti on thoug h Z
,
? ,
-
, ,
, ,
1 50 HI S T ORY OF T HE BRITI SH O CC UPA TI O N OF IN D IA
t
w “ a
place to R u s s o ph o bI a The Peace o f T i l s It upset
fi .
1
p olicy of s t rict n eu t rality and even off ered to
hand o v er t e 18 ut l ej chieftainships to the
“
British o n condition of mutual defen ce against
Am
,
0
,
0 J
prev nt future encroach m ent s N o wonder Ranj it
e‘ ”
had S erious oug s o f appealing to the sword
f ,
c
/
w r
L O RD M IN T O
b ut
‘
S t ate .
“
English was t o go home as fast as they could ,
“
that the Government had the weakne s s n ot to
” 17 1
shoot a single office r The most distinguished
.
'
’
The ren ew al Of the C ompany s charter w a s
eff e c ted during his voyage to In dia in 1 8 1 3 The .
“ ”
shop keeper rule o f the British dates f rom this
-
”
ed s o far that the N a wab Vizir o u t of gratitud e
advanced him a loan o f crores o f r u p e e s l
fl t
.
ill arm ed an d-
i l l disciplined men -
But .
i y et according to S
t
, se the
English fou n d in Nepa w at the Hin dus were
like in early days n ot demoralised by defeat an d
,
”
d isorder . General Gillespie died in the her oic ,
T HE MA R QUE SS OF HAS T IN GS
‘
“
.
,
We
,
’
Europeans in serv i c e Shades of Tipu s fat e
.
tim e colonise .
»
us in all the intrigues an d wars and incalculable ,
o r Dalhousie !
The Pi n d ari War an d t he L as t of t he
Pes hwas
T hus N u s r o o an d his s o w
leaders were m ostly A f Hind military adventure
-I
under Sivaji an d G h a z i u d d i n the son o f the latter 1
ii
,
an d R a j pu t n a presented to Hastings in 1 8 1 5
, ,
“
was o f vas t utility to the Government being mad e ,
war .
THE PI N DAR I WAR AND T HE LAS T OF T HE PE S H WAS 1 5 th
w m m
,
b fl w s
’
a enfl lfl n s e an d
“
eman c ipated rom t i s i n j ur i ou s shackle
i
t he
Govern or Gen eral received all the Raj puts as feu
-
M
WW
e B ritish taking
, con solation i n t h e
“
h ope that their reciprocal estrangem ents wil l
”
pre v ent the i r ever formin an union T he .
“
army con soled it f o r the d iminished prospe c t of 1
,
f -
”
pri son er in the hands o f the English in the words ,
M
with the appointment o f M M
as Resident at Poona troubles egan , p h i n s t o n
. e
was in the diplomatic ser v ice during those event
ful years when the Peshwa was persuaded to
place the yoke of subsidiary al liance o n his ne c k .
4 ,
s ton e after much delay approved of the
, , appoint
ment by the Gaekwar of a most undesirable an d
irritatin g Brahmin named G a n g a d h a r a S a stri who - “
h i s sneak
ing servi ces to the British an d who in the words ,
“
o f Elphinstone himself called the Peshwa and ,
“
I f Baj i Rao h a d been mu ch exasperated b y
”
the recent tran sactions the people were disgusted ,
”
at the grasping police of the British an d they
clam oured f or war Elphin ston e at Poon a was
.
B a l a j e e Pant N a t o o and Y a s v an t r a o G h or pa d e .
very soon .
’
E l phi n s t on e s diplomacy had secured for the
Christian s a v aluable trump c a rd the Raj a of —
“
who saw it in 1 8 01 as displaying sy mptoms of
comfort an d happiness o f busin e ss an d indu stry
,
“ ”
Some w hat Se v ere th e w h ole charge o f t h e subsidy
,
cr i t i s i s e d f o r m aintaini n g hi s contingent at a
lower standard D espite all this h arshn ess Appa
.
,
“ ”
a crowd of crows pecking a v ul t ure to death ,
plan s most .
Jenkins looked “
upon any public mention of these
grie v a n ces as a full admission o f an hostile pur
”
pose 1 9 4 in spite o f continued professions a n d pro
testation s of goodwill an d frien dship “on the part
of the Raj a U n doubtedly th e Raj a
. h ad some ,
“
e time to get ex
”
p e c t e d reinforcem ents an d to relie v e the harass
”
e d con dition O i t h e troops S o he asked Appa
.
,
”
His father howe v er had a determin “
ation to
” ”
remove him from power and his brother was
only too glad to please the Go v ern or General by -
“
that there is n o t a single prin ce o r state w h o
ever put any trust i n t h e Company w h o is n o t
utterly ruin ed came true in his case also .
T he War wi t h t he Holkar
”
gigantic hunts has been described in several
words o n I ndian history . Those P i n dari leaders
wh o sub mitted or betrayed their comrades w e re
rewarded with costly j a gi r s . C h e t o o alon e h e ld
o u t an d at last met a trag i c f a te being d e v oured
,
by a Tiger .
” 1 99
t r i fle s .
M r Ludlow says
. The man ufactures of I ndia were
,
“ ”
to abase the people o f that Presidency
,
2 01
Of.
was also n otori ous for his dish on est deal i ngs a s
«
can be foun d for example from a study o f his
, ,
ch a r a c t e r i s t i c s .
’
”
been praised as s i m ple a n d easily m an a geable
by Sir Jasper Nicoll s Comman der i n Chief as - -
,
“
patient obedient and efficien t by {M aj or General
,
” L
L ORD A M H ER S T 177
.
h ad to pay f or their transport w h en ever
2 03
they were ordered to m ove But at that .
,
“
t im e n o bullocks could be provided n on e could
, ,
c apture B h a r a t por e
of by Lord C ombermere ,
the Comma n der i n Chief -
General Lake s failure
-
’
.
“ ”
Kumbhir meaning al ligator ! After a month
Of siege operations the fort was
, mined
an d the British committed many atr o citi e s an d
cruelties upo n the people .
2 07
authorities
. A fter degrading the Emperor ,
Rs .
Bentinck visited “
O udh in 1 8 3 1 an d threatene d
the king with the direct assumpti on of the
man ag ement of O udh territories by the British
”
Government if a decided reform in administra
tion was n ot eff ected This threat alarmed the
.
“
to the astonishing M aj or h e said If the Gwalior ,
.
a s a pre c edent in 1 8 5 3 .
it 2 1 3
b ut Sir John M al c olm adopted it as his o w n
1 84 HI S TO RY OF T HE B RITI SH OCC UPA TI ON OF IND I A
, ,
Govern or of Bombay .
2 18
“
i n M adras h e h a d on ce said , It is n ecessary in .
“
t hat t h e administration of India is determined
”
b y the c urrent Opini on s o f Englan d an d that
English history a n d In dian history have run in
arallel stream s Avarice said Sir Joh n M alcolm
p .
,
”
n ever desired Besides his p ost as Law Com mis
.
,
Parliam
“
entary C ommittee Of 1 8 5 8 that the C ode
establishes an irrespo n sibility upon the p art of
”
all persons ha v ing powers o f any kind by law .
,
-
.
ies 225
an d his disapproval of th e p oli c y then i n v og u e
to ann ex In di an States on every possible occasion .
S h o oj a
. An annual tribute Of ru pees an d
a ready payment o f two million on e hundred
t housan d rupees f or the immedi ate expense of
the army was collected 2 28
. Th e British officers
c ommitted great excesses o n the lin e o f m arch .
o ffi c ers ,
a c cording to Kaye did n ot kn ow h ow to
,
“ ”
The scan dal was Open undisguised n otorious
, , .
M a c n a g h t e n the Resident
,
desired to re t reat
,
“
on the retreat from Kabul th u s In the pages —
”
Lord G o d of re c ompenses shall surely requite .
L or d E llenbor ough (1842 1844) -
"
“
the M uslim ra ce as f un damentally h os t ile to
us , probably because his wife h ad deserted him
for an Arab Chief of Damas cus The Christian .
“
the religion o f hi s o w n c ountry an d the religion
O f millions o f the Queen s Asiati c subj ects in order
’
”
to pay h on or to an idol But Ellenb orough .
“
The w olf in the fab le did n ot S h ow greater
1 98 H I S T O RY O F T HE BR ITI SH O CC UP ATI ON OF I ND IA
” “
fire high the T alp o or Traitor wh o c ommanded
,
F errier 2 38
,the author of a “History of the Afghans ,
of
’
o ut blood wiped and put int o the murderers
,
army .
E l le n b or o u g h s wrath ’
He assembled armies o n .
y ears of exile at
, Ben ares .
,
“
f or there is still n o app earan c e Of a settlement
without authoritativ e intervention of the British
“
Govern ment . He wanted the disban dment an d
disarmin g of a disaff ected porti on o f the Gw al ior
”
army for (here the cat is at last let out of the
,
“
b a g ) the existen c e O f an army Of su ch stren gth
i n that position must very seriously embarrass the
d isp ositi on o f tro ops we might b e desirous of
”
m aking to m eet a c omin g dan ger from the Sutlej .
with D owlat“
Rao Sin dhi a th ere was a c lause by
which if at any tim e S ci n d i a should b e un able
to c ope with his enemies the British Government ,
”
m ar ch my a rmy t o Gwalior Al l t h e arguments
.
“
and pr otestati on s of Ram a Rao failed as would ,
Committee “
o f the House o f C omm ons had rep orted
in 1 8 32 Within the Penin sula S c i n d i a is the only
, ,
“
agent was repulsed with som e loss an d c ompelled
“
to retire to K u r n a ul but the place wa s soon ,
”
approa che d by a preponderating force and so the ,
”
India published in Lo n don wrote in D e c ember
, ,
” “
must say we smell a rat A mercenary Company
.
ll b e
“
”
obliged wrote the Governor General to keep that
,
-
“
be c ome a traitor f or Ventura anti c ipates a long
,
”
"
inour (British) prote cti o n ! A division w as c reat
f
o f thirty fiv e -
ton s each were lai d o n th e Sutlej
to serve b oth as p onto ons an d f o r transport
purpose An attack was also organ ised o n Lahore
.
’
The Govern or General s corresp onden c e also
-
Edwar ds says 2 4 3 U p to 1 84 2
, the Govern ors ,
Vizier f or he writes
,
“
to t h e D uke of We llington in
September 1 842 , ,I have g ot the king of O ude to
len d 1 0 lacs m ore .
,
”
H ar d i n g e s ambition
’
the anticipatio
“
n of war .
”
on th e f rontier wrote Hardin ge , The M a j or .
“
has s c athingly exposed som e o f these in h i s
”
History o f the Sikhs F or ex am ple he de clared
.
,
“
that the in sidious exertion s of such m ercenary
m en as L al Singh an d Tej Singh coin cided with ’
a n d they
”
the b eliefs of the impulsive soldi ery ,
“
c rossed t h e frontier to g i ve battle to the r e mote
s trangers of Europe who were disturbin g their
lan d . Captain Nicolson from the F erozpur
suspected collusion though Broa d foot denied the
,
”
a llegatio n .
“
proclam ation en couraging desertion from t he
”
S ikh ran ks .The Sikh leaders instead O f m a r c hi n g ,
,
who ,
“
wou l d d o a d m i r a bly at t h e head of a n a d v an ced
” 2 45
g u a rd T h i s w a s o n e o f th e reason s w h y he
w a s a nxi ous n o t to be called su d denly into the
field Ellenb oro u gh h a d s u ggested f o r the Sikh War
.
,
‘
w a s c a lled a r a b ble i n sob er off i ci al d espatches
’
.
o f hi s steady a d here n ce to
'
British interests M r . .
” 2 47
b e i n g a b a ttl e o f t h e o fficial d e sp a tch sin ce the
a ctu a l o n e was a v ery i n s i g n i fic a n t s k i rm i s h were ,
” 250
n ame is insep a rably c on n ected .
zealous Christi an 25 1
a n d prohibite d Sun d ay labour .
.t
U nder the arran gements inaugurated by
Hardinge Dh ul e e p Singh was the n ominal r uler of
,
e x pe c t e d t o do everything .
th e reven “
u e v iz seventeen,
an d a.h alf lakhs of
rupees He dug can als an d in d uced the people
.
“
country . A c cordin g to M arshman Lord Harding e ,
M eanwhile ,
Shere Sing h felt that duty required
him to be near hi s perse cuted father an d he trac e d
L O RD D A E H O U S IE 21 ?
”
troops at a time wh en an y hesitation
on his part might h ave produ c ed seriou s
” 2 60
results . It is n o t n ecessary to enter into
details regarding the battl es of Ramnagar ,
o f paper m on ey an d i s n ow a s v alueless as a
n o t e when the ban k has broken Against the .
“ ’
E van s Bell obser v es Lord Da l h o u s i e s pr o cedure
,
’
We shall n o w turn to Da l h ou s i e s war with
Burma which were also eq u ally unm oral In
,
.
“
dem an d reparation though h e kn ew t h at
, th ese
C omm odores are t o o combustible {for n egotiations ”
.
22 0 H I S T O RY OF T HE BRITI SH O CC U PA TI O N or 1 1111 1 1 .
sin cere and that his Go v ern ment will fully act u p
”
t o what he has promised The n ew Govern or r e
.
“
But the Commo dore w a s too combustible
he wanted to pick a q uarrel som ehow an d s o h e
“ ”
exagger“a ted the disrespect sho w n by the Go v ern or
”
to the“ d eputation carrying to him h i s letter by
their h aving been kept wai t ing for a full quarter
of an h our i n the sun an d o f recei v ing it without
’’
“
C f B urma This w a s t h e firs t act Of th e war
. As .
”
i n very d e r i s o n an d m ockery o f h i s superi or s
’
if
orders h e proclaim ed th e s a m e d a y in virtue o f
,
B assein an d th e S a l w e i n ab o v e M o u l mein to b e
”
in a state o f blockade . I t is a m os t perplexing
fact that there does n o t appear o n e w ord o r syllable
oi
~
rem onstran ce from th e Govern or Ge n era l to -
p u
I n v ain di d the Burmese offi ci als entreat Lambert
t o release th e ki n g s shi p The Go v ern or o f
’
.
returned
“
with shot an d shell Lambert
. chuckled ,
c l a r e d had n o
, tim e to explain m atters f or from ,
’
fact D a lhousie received the king s reply seven
,
’
annexed to the Company s possession s mainly
b ecause it was reputed t o contain many
gold mines and its ancient name was S w a r n a
Bhumi ! The Engl ish wanted to enri c h themselves
’
a n d cripple Burm a s finan cial re s our c es .
”
t er i s e d i t as real rapacity .
fic an c e in his eyes i s
.
class th e Co mp a n y ha d no r
'
.
2 24 HI S T O RY OF
" 1 HE
‘
BRITI SH O CC U PA TI ON IN IN DIA
“
w rote to his n ephew : The reigning Raj a is I hear , ,
I n 1 848 ,
the b r ot h er also died lea v ing an ,
a dopted s on .
The ‘
sons adopted ac cording
to Hin du Law and Religion were s et
a si de a n d
,
tho u gh the Satara R a j was paying n o
,
” ‘
D alhousie laid down th at th e Ran ees n atur al
‘
j eal ousies their feelin gs an d interes ts m us t make
,
’ ’
,
“
2 5 t h Jan 1 8 5 4 that Nagpore had lapsed into the
.
1
The reasons for th e
an exation of N a pore did
n g
“
a g reat cotton prod uc ing provin ce and n ot mu c h ,
upon her w as ,
so s t ung b y a sense o f t he
indignity Off ered t o h er t hat s he threatened t o
fir e the pala c e if t h e f urni t ure w ere removed
, .
’ “
the Sub edar s b ody N 0 other law was intended
.
O n e c an not fa il to be s t ru c k wi t h the f r e q u en
c y of d eath with out heirs among In di a n S o vereign s
fr om t h e m om ent when the p oli c y of an n exat ion
”
i s pro c laim ed by a Govern or Ge n eral says -
,
Ludlow 2 69
. The l a st Raj a of J h ansi di ed i n
Nov 1 8 5 3 ; the k i nsman whom he had adop t e d
.
a s his s o n was
“
n ot re c ogni s ed D alhousie . de
e l a r e d t hat the ado p t ion w a s go o d for t h e c on
v e y a n c e of private righ t s though n ot for t h e ,
“
B ut in the c as e of J hansi
, there w a s n o gi ft ,
‘ ’ ‘ ’
J hansi w a s n o j agheerdar but a her e ditary ruler ,
granted “
that title by the Compa ny though it w as ,
“
as the m ost prep osterous example of our n ati on al
”
n ep otism . D alhousie al so o cc upied Berar
temp orarily for th e de b ts of th e Nizam an d 5 0
years later another British Lord the s on o f a
, ,
u e
.
“ ”
on all h a n ds as Dacoity in Ex c elsis & c .
” “
lines , said the Reveren d Chri stian two lines in ,
,
’
the V izier gett ing an gry at the i n no c ent Nawab s
,
s t rong se t ti n g
The In di an Muti ny O f 1857
med
,
\
threatening the fate of that land He ass u .
‘
Burke des cribed as birds of prey and passage
in I ndia showed themselves only a S hade les s
’
”
insti t uti on s a n d t h e immemorial usages O f the lan d .
“
won der M r Fraser sa i d : There I s d i s a fie Ct i on e n o u gh
’
, .
”
for h alf a dozen reb ellion s for V e n g en c e sleeps
,
”
lo n g but n ever dies .
T HE IN D I AN MUT IN Y OF 1 8 57 2 35
“
T h e Sikh Chiefs were stripped o f all rank deprived ,
”
dishonour an d barbarous mutilatio n of women .
“
als o note that it i s o n the re c ords O f our British
Parliament in papers sent ho m e by the Gover n or .
‘
General in Coun cil that the aged women an d
c hildren are sa c rifi c ed as well a s those guilty of
’
re b ellion Th ey were n ot deliberately hanged but
.
“
Charles Di l ke says An O f fi c er in h igh c ommand ‘
during the march up on C awnpore rep orte d good
“
bag today polish ed O ff rebel s
, It is certain
’
” 2 7 9"
unable to speak any word o f any n ative lan guage ‘
“
to colonise ,
India .
”
Met c alfe had pointed out that the C omp any s h old ’
’
was n ot likely to b e s o p erm an ent as the King s
a nd that the European s set t led in In dia would
n ever b e sat isfied with C ompany Govern ment Th e .
“ ”
This enlighten ed selfish n ess seized the Sep oy
Muti n y as a c onvenient pretext an d agitated for
‘
“
at their o w n expense an d the agen c y o f their
o w n c ivil an d military s ervants a cq uired th e
m agnifi c ent Empire i n th e E ast at a tim e when a
s u cc ession of administration s under the c ontrol of
P arliamen t were losin g t o th e Crown of Great
B ri tain another great E m pire on the opposi t e side
”
o f the Atlanti c ! Th ey p ointed o ut with great
emph asis that their gov ern m ent an d defen c e of
of In di a had b een d on e f or a c entury without the
sm allest cost to the British E x ch e q uer a n uni q ue
—
.
,
“
thet i c s t rain. That y our peti t ion ers ca nn o t .
T h is pe titi o n w as O f n o av a il T h e Gov e rn m en t .
M r Fr eeman writes
. whe n w e c om e to man i f e s
,
.
,
“
t h e House of C o m m ons was appointed in 1 8 5 8 t o
i n q uire in t o t h e progress an d prospe c ts an d the b e s t
means t o b e adop t ed for the prom oti on of Eu ropean
c olonisat ion a n d se tt lemen t in India esp e c ially in ,
“
-
C ompany .
Ref eren ces
Th e vol um e and e nu mbers r efe r to M” aj or B D
ri s t i a n P o we r i n I n d ia
. .
B a su s R i s e o f t h e 5 Vols
’ ‘ .
, .
3 . Ka y e A t i sta n II
, q uo t ed in Vol I X IVI , . . .
’
4 B r uc s s of t h e E as t I n d ia C o mpa n y I 1 2 8
fé
. nn , , .
g O] I
5 . M i ll H i s to ry of In dia IV ch i Vol I 2 3 , . . . . . .
6 . B ishop H eber s Jo ur na l Vo l I 34
’
. . .
7 P oh t i ca l H s t o r y of In d i a Intr oducti on 2
i
—
.
p r . .
v O l I z37
8 C o lo l M alles on Dec i s i v e B a ttles in Indi a Vol I
ii e
—
. . .
A c ui s mon W i l liam Ho w i t V ol I 43
q
. . .
10 T he C ut t a R e v i ew v ol V II 1 84 7 p 2 2 6 V ol
zc
. . . . . .
,
II 4
G r a n t u H Hi s t or y o f the M ahrat tas 1 8 7 3 p 340
DZ
11 . , . .
vO I Z
W estern In di a R e v P hilip
.
12 . T h e E n g lish in , .
An de rson p 22 Vol I 5 4 , . . .
13 . S C H i ll B eng al In 1 7 5 6 7 v ol III 1 6 1 1 62
. .
— -
, . .
-
.
Vo l I 6 6 .
14 . I bid II p 1 6 Vol I 6 4
. . . . . .
16 . S C Hi ll v ol III p 3 84 Vol I 6 9
. .
, . , . , .
17 .
—
,
v ol I p 1 9 0 Vol I 89
. , . . . .
18 . . . . . . . . .
1 7 5 6 Vol I 9 3 . , .
20 .
—
,
p 16 2 V o l I 9 5
. . . .
21 . . , . . .
22 . C alcu t ta U ni v er s i ty M ag a z m e 1 8 95 V p l I 98 , . . .
p 59 Vo l I 9 8
.
, . .
24 . B e n g al i n 1 7 56 1 7 5 7 Vol I p X C IV , Vol I 1 06 -
, .
, .
, .
25 . M aj or K i r k a t r i ck t o t h e C ourt of Di rectors , 2 5 t h
Jan 1 75 7 , Vol I 1 09
. . ,
R E F EREN C E S 2 43
S .C Hill v ol I p C XV V o l:I 1 1 1
. , .
, .
,
.
S C H i ll Vol i i p p 7 4 7 6 Vo l I 1 1 6
. . . , .
-
. . .
Iv e s Voy a g e s p 1 09 V o l I 1 2 7
’
, .
, . .
S craf t on R e fle c t i on s p 6 6 Vo l I 1 33
—
, . . . , .
Iv e’s v oy ag es p 1 19 1 2 0 Vo l I 1 4 4 45
’
, . . .
,
-
.
Iv e s Vo y ag es p 1 45 V ol I 1 85 , . . .
, .
De cisi v e B a t t l es 7 3 Vo l I . 1 8 9 , . .
O rm e His t ory of
—
d us t a n v o l II p 8 2 Vol I , .
, . . .
,
De cisive B at tl es p 7 1 Vo l I 2 06 —
M il l v ol III p 1 35 Vol I 2 9 0
.
,
—
. . .
,
M i ll v ol II I p 2 03 Vo l I 22 8
—
.
, . , . .
.
O rme v o l II p 1 95 Vo l I 2 2 4
—
.
, .
,
.
,
\
.
I bid . VO L I1 2 2 3
M alcolm Li f e of O li v e v ol Il p 7 0 7 2 Vol I 2 3 0
.
p
-
, , . . .
, .
I bid Vo l II p p 1 1 9 e t s e q 0 1 I 2 35
.
,
.
, . .
, .
First R e po r t 1 7 7 2 p p 1 5 8 1 5 9 V ol T , , .
, .
First R e lpoort 1 7 7 2 p 1 6 0 V o l I 2 48 , , .
, .
, .
, .
rO i I o
Fi r s t R ep ort l 7 7 2 np 23 0 1 V ol I 2 5 9, ,
-
. .
—
. . .
F i rs t R e por t 1 7 7 2 p 2 32 V o l I 2 70 , , . . , .
Ibi d V o l I 2 7 0
. . , .
I bi d Vol I 2 7 1 .
p
—
,
R e p r i nt) T I
Professor Sy dne O wen India —
on t he E ve of
the B ri tish on q u e s t Vol I . .
, 2 97
W heeler E ar ly R eco r ds —
p 2 75 2 7 6 Vol I 2 99 .
-
.
M ill v ol III
—
2 24 V o l 3 04 .
2 9 23 0 V o l
. .
M ill III 1 3 08 .
V e r els t i e w s o f B e n g a l p p 8 and 46 V ol I , 3 09 .
8 2 1 7 64 Vol I 3 09
- -
. .
, .
Ibid P 2 06 V ol I
.
, .
, .
I bid P 2 07 ’ N O 1 7 80 Vol
.
.
, ,
.
,
39 0 1 Vol I 3 3 1 -
. .
, .
3 25 3 2 6 . V ol I , 3 36 .
244 HI ST OR Y OF T HE BRI TI SH O CC UPATI ON OF I N D IA
63 . Seir ul-
—
M ut a q ue r i n .
T rans . C ol . B rig g s . P an i n i
R e pri nt Vo l
g ge
fii , 1 924, v ol . .
0
4 78 4 7 9 -
. .
zg
64 . B roo me Hi story o f the R ise an d Prog re ss of t h e
,
B e n g al Ar my , p 35 1 V l I 35 1: . . . ,
v ol III, 3 68 3 69 Vo l I 36 2
. -
P o w er
. . .
,
.
.
66 .
Ri se ’ of B r l lZl S
p 3 9 7 V o l I 3 , . . . . .
- -
. . . . .
, ,
69 . L on g pp 55 3 5 5 4
. 3 96
.
-
.
S ta n n Account of B en g al , vol IX p 1 9 1 V ol
f f l
. .
.
,
i )
71 . W heeler E arl y R e cords Vol I, 4 1 4
—
. .
.
.
72 . Sei r III p 9 V o l I 4 2 6
.
, . . ,
.
73 . T h i r d R e po r t 1 7 7 3 3 94 V l I , 427 , , . . .
76 .
—
. , . . . .
78 E ar l y R eco r ds p 3 7 5 Vo l I 45 1 , . . . . .
79 . Sei r , v’ol II I p 3 2 V ol I 45 1
. , .
, . , ,
81 . S ei r , vol I 6 5 Vol I 5 .
,
. . , .
bi h t i e s p 2 5 Vol II 7 . . . . . .
84 . Gr ant Duf f p 32 V ol II 3 9 , . . .
, .
M ill 11 1 p 43 2 V o l II 4 7
. . . .
,
Gr ant D uff p 3 40 Vo l II 40 , . . .
, .
Vol II 86 .
, .
S e i r p 2 05 V o l II 1 44
‘
.
, . . ,
89 . I b id P 2 06’ Vo l II, 1 46
. . . . . . .
90 . S e i r B r i g S T r an s lat ion p 3 5 4 V ol II 1 5 1
, , . . . . .
a c J an V II 9 9
,
91 . C l u t t a e v 1 e w 1 8 45 o l , . . .
, ,
92 . Ibid Vol II 1 00 . . .
93 M em o i r s o f M a d r a s S i r C harles L aws o n p 6 8 . , . .
Vol II 1 6 0 . . .
I d i E m ire L on d o
OE n
n
94 . r a n p ,
l Bz
Vol I 4 1 5 V l II 1 6 4
fia g gg $5 f §g
95 . o n v al 0 s
e i i n tl c e p o . . . . . .
96 i 5 1 l l
L echm Hi s t Or y o f E hg la n d Vol III P 1 9 7
.
97 .
'
Vol . . , . . .
98 . Mi l V ol .
II , 1 75 .
R E F ERE N C E S 245
99 R e vd H u t ton M a r q u cs s W ellesle y R o f P
W H
S e rie s P 32 Vol II 9 9
. . . . . . .
. . . .
, .
1 00 W i l k s
. Historical s ke t c h of t h e So ut h o f I n dia
. .
V o l III 13 38 Vo l II 1 00 .
, . .
, .
1 01 .M ill V o l V VO I II 1 89
. .
, .
, .
1 02 M i ll Vo l V p 2 7 8 Vo l II 1 90
. . .
, . . , .
1 03 T horn t on
. Hi st o r y o f B i i t i s h I n dia.V ol II 1 6 3 . .
, .
1 04 M ill V 3 2 7 t u Vol II 1 96
. . . . . .
, .
pp 4 19 42 1 V o l II 1 9 8 -
M i ll V p 3 5 5 V o l II 2 01
. . . .
1 06 . . o . .
1 07 Fi f t h R e p m t M r Dow d e s w e l l s E vidence
’
1 81 2 , , . ,
V o l II 2 06
108 K ay e I bi d P 2 00 V o l
. , .
. . . . . .
1 09 M ill V 3 32 V ol II 2 08
. . . .
, .
1 1 0 M a c N e i le M e m o r a n d um on t i e R e v en u e A d m i n i s
’
t r a t i on o f t h e L ow e r Pro vin ce o f B e n g al p 9
. .
. . .
V ol II 2 09 . . .
Vol II 2 1 7
Pate r Aube r R is e and Prog r es s o f t h e B r iti s h
, .
1 12
Pow e r i n India L ondon 1 83 7 Vol II p 1 40
. .
. .
, , .
V ol II 2 18 .
G r an t Du f f p 5 2 1 V ol II 23 7
. ,
1 13
6
. .
. .
,
M a cFa r la n e Vo l Il p
,
1 14 . V O L II 2 4 . . ,
M a j o r Bi r d Ass t R e siden t f o r O i i d e
, .
“
1 15 . Dacoi t y i n
, . .
E x c e l s is p p 32 3 4 Vo l II 2 5 4 .
-
. .
,
Vol II 25 7 .
, .
1 17 M a c Fa r Ja n e Vo l II p 3 1 V ol II 255 .
, . .
1 18 R R . . . .
33 0 8 8 8 of W e lle sle y
1 Vol II p 2 89 Vo l
1 26
. . .
, , .
7
1 1 9 A s i a t i c Q uarterl y R evi e w Jan 1 8 87 Vol II 29 3
. . . .
12 0 M a r ia G i a h a m Jo u r n al o f a R es i d e n c e i n India
. .
,
1 8 13 P I p 8 4 8 5 V o l II 3 0 7 . .
-
. .
, .
6 6 9 V ol II 3 1 5 . . , .
1 2 2 I bi d V o l II 3 1 5
. . . . .
1 23 l b id I 3 8 2 V o l II 3 3 0
. . , . .
, .
1 24 I hi d I 4 00 V ol II 3 3 2
M i ll VI , p 1 09 V o l II 342
. . . . . , .
1 25 . . . . , , .
1 26 B i r d Dac oity i n E x c el s is
. V ol II 348. . .
,
12 7 M i l l V I p 1 9 1 Vol II 350
. , .
, . . .
1 28 B i r d I bi d
. V o l II 3 5 9
, , , .
1 08 V ol I 388 . .
, .
246 HI S T O RY OF T HE BRITI SH O CC UPATI ON CF IN DI A
II 3 98
. .
R a n ad e p 2 5 0 1 V ol 1
. 400 -
.
,
M i ll v i p 21 6 V o l II 4 01
. .
, , .
, .
B a r t L o n d on 1 83 2 v o l I p p 1 60 1 6 2 , , .
, .
-
.
V o l II , 4 12 .
in e of B o mbay G az ett e e r p 1 2 7 m V ol
.
S ur a t
qg , . . .
II
I bid P l 2 9n Vol I I 41 6
. . . . .
M i ll vi 207 - 208 Vo l II 4 1 7 .
W e ll e s l e y De s pa t ch e s II p 2 2 2 2 23 Vol II 4 1 9
. .
-
, .
,
M i ll v i p 2 08 2 1 1 V o l II 4 2 2
‘
—
. .
G i a nt Duff p 5 40 V ol II 44 0
. .
, , .
, .
M i l l v i p 1 3 0 Vol II 445
, . . . .
ll v i p 27 1 V o l
, .
Ibi d p 2 8 1 V o l II I
I
. . .
Pe a i c s W e ll e s le y v ol II
’
3 43 e t s e q V O L
fi
p , , . .
l 82
W e l le i De p a t ches v ol II I p 1 8 5 e t s e q V ol
i
- .
, , . . .
II
As i a t i c Journ al Jan 1 845 p p 305 3 1 0 Vol III 1 45 , .
, . . .
, .
C o m p ton p p 1 7 3 1 7 4 V o l II 1 6 0 , .
-
, . , .
Ah m e d n a g ar G a ze t t ee r p 6 95 01 III 1 6 9 . . .
, .
M i ll v i 3 5 8 Vol III 1 95
, . .
1 8 83 V o l . .
i e y De s pa t c h e s v ol I V p 6 4 V ol III 2 64 . . . . , . , .
M i l l v i p 4 00, V o l III 2 99
I
, . ,
G r an t v ol .
M il l vi Vo l IIL 4 01
N o t e s on In d i a n Af f a i r s F J Shore
. .
—
. . V ol III 3 6 0 ,
M e m oi i s o f Am ee r K h an tr a n s by Pr i n s e p , p
2 1 5 Vo l .
A m e e r K h an p 2 8 6 V o l III 4 7 6
Po li t i a l Hi s tory of In d i a V ol, III 4 7 9
.
, . , . ,
K ay ‘ s S e le c ti on s f r o m t h e P a p er s ‘
of L ord
M e t r a lf e p 7 V o l III 4 80 , . . . .
E d i n l u i g h R e v i ew 1 8 07 V o l III 4 84 .
M
“
i ll V 3 8 7 V o l IV 9
‘
”
.
L OI n t o i n In d i a by L a d y M i n t o p 1 8 5 Vol
VMi , . . .
I
RE FE RE N C E S 2 47
Indian
IV lli
167 . R ay L ‘ eS of . .
, . . .
1 68 M in t o i n In d i a p p 9 8 1 01 Vol IV 42 -
,
I bid P 1 5 4 V o l IV 6 6
. . . . .
1 69 . . . .
, .
1 70 . M a c Fa r lan e V o l II p 1 8 1 Vol I V 9 0 . . . , .
, .
, . I .
p p 32 3 324 Vol I V 9 2
. . . , .
. . , .
,
3199 :
1 93
. . . . .
,
5
176 . W ilson on M ill V ol V III Vol IV 1 34 . . . .
, .
177 P r i n s e p I V ol I V 1 3 7
I bid P 1 9 2 V o l Iv 1 5 4
. . .
178 . . . .
1 79 .
-
, . . .
. . . .
,
2 n d E d i ion) Vo l IV 1 6 3
I bi d P
. .
, .
181 . . . 43 3n Vol . . IV .
II p 1 9 3 11 V ol I V 1 88
, . . .
.
1 85 Pr i v n e J o u r n al o f t he M a r uess o f Has t in g s
Pa n i n i O f fii c e R ep r i n t p 2 7 Vol I V 1 9 6
. .
.
,
1 86 C o l e b r O O k e s E lph i ns t on e l 27 6 Vo l I V 2 09
’
. . . .
, .
DD 6 8 Vol I V 224
. . . . , .
B aro d a G a z e t t e e r p V ol I V 2 2 7 . . .
1 89 B arod a G a z e t t e e r p 22 2 Vo l I V 2 40
i r s i n In d i a L ondon 1 82 3 p 4 92 Vol
. . . , .
Fli i Tl
OfV géa
1 90 .
, , , . . .
K a y e s Li f e o f M a l c ol m II, 2 5 7 V ol I V 2 7 0
’
191
‘
Di g by P r o s e r ou s Indi a 4 5 0 V ol W 27 2
.
, . . . .
1 92 . . . .
0 V ol I V 2 9 0
.
1 93 P r i n s e p Vo I , pp 42 7 -
1 94 .
p 70 V o l I V 2 9 9
Nolan s His to of t h e B rit ish E mpire Vol II
. .
1 95
’
. . .
,
pp 5 1 0 1 1 .0 1 I V, 3 3 7 -
. . .
2 48 H I S T ORY OF T HE BRITI SH O CC UPA TI O N or IN DI A
E a s t wi c k p p 1 03 1 04 V o l IV 3 3 7 .
-
, .
1 97 . L t L a k e J o u r n a l o f t h e S e 1g e s of t h e M ad ras
.
,
A r m y , p 1 07 V o l IV 3 41
T ou r s i n U p pe r In d ia I p 2 Vol
. . .
1 98 . M a j or A r c h e r .
, , . .
IV 3 45
P r i va t e Jou r n al
.
,
1 99 . V ol I V 34 4 . , .
2 00 . I h1d P p
.
2
4 et 1 IV 3 5 2
. .
, .
L ud B r l t l s h In d Vol II pp 3 7 3 8 V ol I V
lg gg
20 1 . o . .
, .
-
. .
,
2 02 T or r e n I ) 2 90 1 V o l I V 3 6 2
V
.
. , .
, .
T h orn t o n 1 05 V o l IV 4 1 7
W
. . , ’
2 04 K ay e H 1s t o r y of the S e p o y a r pp ; 2 7 9 2 7 1 1101
‘
. . . .
IV 4 2 3
2 05 M ili t a r y R e mini s cen c es W e lsh V ol II p p 2 40 4 1
. . . .
, . .
Vo l IV 4 .
,
2 06 L ud lo w II ) 26 5 Vo l IV 440
I
.
. , .
, . .
2 07 A u b e r V o l I, p 606 N 0 1 IV 4 44
. . . . . .
, .
f a y e C a lc ut t a R e v i e W V o l I , p 3 4 1 Vol
Rfi
2 08 S ir
é
. .
. . . . ,
?
2 09 R e v U 1 M o e g li n
. . Hi s to r y o f C oo r g ; V ol IV 45 5
. . . , .
2 1 0 M aj o r E va n s B e ll T h e M y s or e R e vers i on p p 2 1 2 4
.
—
, .
-
.
Vol IV 4 6 0 .
, .
2 11 . ,
A pri l Va r 1 t as V ol IV 46 3 .
, .
2 12 J oh n Hop e T h e H ou se o f S i n d h i a a Sketch
.
—
,
1 8 63 L on g ma n s V o l IV 4 68 . . .
, .
213 C a pta i n
. C un n i n g ha m Hi s t o ry of the Sikhs .
,
p ’ 2 05 V 0 1 I V, 4 7 2 . . .
2 14 K a y e s Se le ct io n s p p 2 11 2 1 7 V ol I V 4 7 4
. , . . .
, .
. . . . .
. , .
2 17 1 b 1d V o l I p 1 2 V o l I V
P o li t ica l o r Fo r e ig n M i nut es o f E vi dence b e fore
. .
, . . .
2 18
t h e Par liam e n t ar y C om mi tt ee o f 1 832 V ol VI
.
.
V o l IV 4 9 0
M
.
.
,
2 2 0 Li e u t e n a n t White
. C on s i d e r a t i on s On the S t a t e ,
”
o f B r In d Ia p p 6 0 6 1 V ol I V .
,
. . ,
Mil l a n d Wi ls on ix , p 39 4 V ol V , 2 2 . . . .
Dr . G a rn et t A f or g o t t en E p i sode of
H i s tory , 225 V ol V, 3 8
”
. . .
RE FERE N CE S 2 49
Vo1 I .
I p 2 9 8 V ol V 5 5
2 2 8 L ut u f ul la h pp 2 94 2 9 6 V ol V 5 6
. .
, .
,
-
.
, .
2 2 9 M ohan L al
. . , .
206 2 09 Vo l V 5 9
-
. .
, .
2 3 0 K ay e Ibi d p 2 02 V ol V 6 1
. , .
,
. .
, .
I bid p p 1 43 1 44 V ol V 6 2
, .
-
.
, .
2 33 N i n e t e e i t h C en t ur y f or Aug u st 1 899 , p 2 38 V ol
é
.
, . .
‘r g
2 3 4 Hansard v ol xix Third seri es p l 9 1 V o l V 7 1
. , , , . . .
, .
2 36 . Gr e at e r B r it ain Vol V 9 4 . .
, .
L ondon 1 893 p 1 4 1 V ol V 1 05 .
—
. .
b y C 1 J esse M urray L on d on
$
—
.
,
Vo l 2 87
. .
2 3 9 John HC p e pp 46 49 V ol V 1 1 8
. . . .
,
.
2 4 0 I bi d P p 5 3 5 9 V o l V 1 2 5
. . . . .
, .
241 . I bi d P p 66 6 7 Vol V 1 2 8
. . . . .
Vol V, 1 48 .
2 43 . . . of ,
p 5 7 Vol V 1 5 5 .
2 44 L i f e o
. .
,
v 16
C ol ch e s t e r s E ll e n b or oug h p Vol V 1 88
’
. .
, ,
246 R e m i n i s c e n c e s p 92 93 Vo l V 2 00
.
, . . . .
1 86 7 Vol V 201 . .
, .
248 R e m i n i s c e n c es p
. 9 9 1 00 Vo l V 2 02 . .
-
. . . .
2 4 9 R ulers o f In d i a
. eries M onog rap h on Ha rdin g e ,
p 1 1 9 Vo l 2 04
. . . .
25 0 Ludlow H 1 5 4 V ol V 2 1 3
. . , . . , .
25 2 . C a re e r o f M aj or B road f oot p 2 6 8 V ol V 1 7 9 , . . , .
p 2 4 1 V o l V, 2 3 1 . . .
2 5 4 Dr B uist Narrati v e p 6 V ol V 2 3 5 —
255
P un j ab Pap e rs 1 2 7 1 Vol V 2 43
. .
.
, . ,
256
Pros p e cts of Indian P oli cy 5
.
.
, . . .
,
25 7. R e t ros p e c t s an ,
p p 1 2 6 27 Vol V 2 5 I
. . . .
p 1 3 4 Vo l V 2 5 4
. . .
. .
2 60 T he I ab Ch i ef s 1 8 90 Vol I p 1 1 09 Vol
.
u
gé
. . . . .
, , ,
7x g
L ett e r s o f E con o mist R ep ri n t e d b y the S un
’ ‘
26 1
Printi n g Pre s s Lahor e 1 89 7 V ol V 2 6 7
. .
.
26 2 .
, . . . . .
“
2 63 . C o bden How wars are g o t u p i n I n d i a 1 8 67
.
,
.
p 3 0 Vol V 2 83
. . .
, .
2 64 C o bde n 19 5 5 6 0 V ol V 296
£
. -
Ibid ’P 53 Vo l V 3 05
. .
, . .
,
265 . . . .
, .
266 K a e ; Sep oy W a r 1 8 6 9 V ol I p 6 9 V ol V
gi
. . . ,
.
, . .
,
i
267 . L ee w a r n e r s L i f e of L ord Da lhou s ie V ol II
’
. . .
p 1 58
. V o l V, 3 2 1 . . .
. .
.
, ,
VO ] V 3 3 7 . . .
2 69 . B r i ti s h India Vol II p 1 9 0 V ol V 3 4 3 . . , . . .
, .
270 E m p i re i n In di a p 9 7 V o l V 3 42
.
. . . . .
.
,
27 1 .
The S t ate s man J uly 1 1 880 V o l V 3 46; , . . .
,
2 73 .
I bid Jul y 1 8 55 Vol V 3 58
.
, . . , .
p 2 96 V ol V
, .
,
27 5 S O C I3 1 S t ati sti cs V ol , V 3 7 2
.
. .
. ,
27 6 .
B os w o r t h S mi t h Li fe of L ord L a wren c e II . ,
p 3 08 V ol V 3 7 9
. .
,
.
. .
. .
,
pp 2 5 8 2
. 59 V ol V 4 1 4 -
. . . .
2 82 . R e view of R e vie w s A p 1 8 9 7 V ol V 4 1 6 ,
. . . , .
Pa g e
Afgh anistan 1 5 0, 1 5 4, 1 60, 1 8 3, 1 9 1 4 , 1 9 6
—
A h a l y a B h ai 6 0, 7 8
Akb a r Khan 1 93 4, 1 9 6
-
Amh e rs t Lord 1 7 4 1 7 9, 1 80
-
Arcot Na w a b o f
,
6 0 ,
6 3 , 7 2 , 80, 8 1 , 9 6 9-
8, 2 2 8
Aucklan d Lord 1 5 6, 1 9 1 1 94 -
u ran g az e b 5 3, 6 7
Baj i R a o Pes h w a 1 03 7 , 1 59 , 1 6 1 , 1 62, 1 6 3,
-
1 6 4, 1 7 8
B a l a b h a d r a Singh 1 5C
B al a j i V is hwanath 5 3, 5 9
Barrackpore M assa c re 1 7 6, 1 7 7
B A TT LE O F
Aliwal
Deeg
F erozeshah
G o oj r a t
Kir k ee
Kurdla
Laswari
M ahidpur
M e ean e
IIo o d k e e
& Panipat
Plassey
2 52 H IS T OR Y O F T HE BR ITI S H O CC U PATI O N OE I N DI A .
Pa g e
Ramnagar 217
Batuta I bn 52
Bell M aj or Evans
. 1 , 9 7 , 1 8 2, 2 1 8 , 2 2 7
B e n fie l d Paul 81
Ben tin ck Lord William 1 41 , 1 4 5, 1 4 6 1 80 9 0, 2 32,
-
Best Captain
,
6
B h o n s l e The ,
57 , , 1 1 2 1 1 6 , 1 2 4, 1 6 5 9 2 2 4 6
,
- -
B o i g n e de 1 1 5, 1 21
Bro a dfoot M a j or 2 07 2 09 -
Broome 37
B u n d o o la h M ah a M en g 17 6
Burke 34 49 7 8 1 6 9 , , ,
Burma 1 7 4 7 2 19 22 - -
2 26, 2 29
Canning Lord , 2 3 2, 2 4 1
Carnatic 7 8, 6 3, 64, 9 6 9 8 1 8 7 , 2 2 8
- -
Casi R aj a Pun d it 52
Charter Renewal o f, 1 5 3, 1 8 7 9 0, 2 3 3 2 3 7
-
C h u t t ur Singh Raj a 2 14 2 1 6 -
Cli v e Lord 5 1 4 20 22 ,
-
, , 2 3 5 , 3 3 44 4 6 , 4 7 ,
-
,
-
4 9 , 1 2 0 1 9 3, 2 4 1
,
Cobden 22 2
Colebrooke
C oorg -
81
Coote M aj or
.
~
Cornwallis Lord , ,
Cunningham M aj or ,
Cutch 1 56
Dalhousie Lord 1 38, 1 5 6 , 2 1 2 2 3 1 , 2 33 -
de Souza A lfonso 5
Dh u l e e p Singh 2 07 8 , 2 11 1 2 , 214, 2 1 6
- -
I N D EX 2 53
4 8 , 6 4 , 7 4, 87 , 93, 94 1 39 , 1 4 0, 1 4 1 1 7 3, 1 8 5 , , ,
1 95 ,
Diwani The , 3 5, 4 5 , 4 6 , 1 2 0 2 4 1 ,
D octrin e o f Lapse 1 8 2 2 2 3, 2 2 4 ,
D ost M uhammad 1 9 1 , 1 92 , 1 9 3 1 9 4 , 1 9 6 , 2 1 4 ,
Duff Grant
, 1 3 1 , 1 5 7 2 3 0 7 2 , 1 29 , ,
Dupleix 7 , 8 45 ,
Dutch The , 5 , 2 5 , 4 6 1 5 1 ,
Dutt R C
. . .
,
1 8 7 , 2 30
h
E d i n ou r g h Revie w 1 46
Ellenborough Lord 1 5 6 1 9 1 , 1 9 5 2 06 2 07 2 2 0 ,
-
, ,
Elphin ston e 3 6, 4 0, 4 5 1 5 1 , 1 6 0 1 6 2 , 1 6 3 1 6 5 , , , ,
1 66 1 91 ,
Emperor Moghul 2 4, 2 6 32 3 3 3 5 4 1 4 5, 46 , , .
, ,
5 9 , 6 0 7 3 , 1 1 3 1 1 4 , 1 2 1 , 1 7 8 1 8 2 2 05
, , , ,
1 9 8 2 39 ,
Fren c h , The 7 9 1 2 17 8 , 1 9 , 2 4, 46 , 5 7 8 5 9,
-
, ,
- -
,
6 2 , 6 5 , 6 6 , 7 5 , 8 8, 8 9, 9 0 9 1 , 1 03, 1 1 3 , 1 2 1 1 2 2 , 1 4 9 -
G aekwar The ,
5 5, 5 6 , 1 1 3 1 1 9 , 1 6 0, 1 6 2
,
Gangadhar Sastri , 1 6 0, 1 6 1
G a tes o f Somn ath 1 9 6 2 02 , 2 06 ,
Gulab Singh R a j a , 2 05 2 07 -
G w ali or 2 00 4, 2 06 -
Hardinge Lord ,
2 06 , 2 07 2 1 1 -
.
216
Hastings M ar q uess of 1 53 1 7 3 -
Hastin gs , Warren 34 3 6 37 4 7 4 9 5 1 , , , ,
-
. 7 2, 7 3 , 7 8 ,
1 1 3, 2 3 9
Heb er Bish op 9
Hi u e n Tsan g 52
2 54 H I S T O RY OR T HE BRITI SH O CCU PATI ON C F IN D I A
Pa g e
H ol k a r The 4 3 5 8 5 9 7 8 1 06 9 1 1 3 1 2 5 1 3 8
, , , , ,
-
, ,
-
1 3 9 , 1 4 2 , 1 4 4 , 1 4 5, 1 4 8 1 57 , 1 7 0 7 1 ,
-
Holwell 1 4 1 5 , 2 6, 2 7 28, 2 9 .
,
Hunter, Sir W W . . 43
Hyder Ali 60, 6 1 , 6 2 , 6 3 6 5 , 6 6, 9 1 -
Im pe y Sir El ij a h
, 5 0, 5 1
I n am Commission , 22 4
I ndus , Na v iga t ion o f the , 1 83, 2 1 6
J e nkin s 1 3 3, 1 6 5, 1 6 6 , 1 6 7 ,
Jeypore 1 82
Jhansi 6 0, 1 8 3, 2 2 6, 2 2 8
Jodhpur 1 82
Kaye , S i r Joh n 1 0 1 59, 1 92 1 9 3, 1 9 4 , 1 9 7 1 9 8 ,
, ,
2 3 , 2 2 6 2 33, 2 3 5
" ,
,
Keene , H G . . 60
Lake , General 1 08 1 1 1 , 1 1 3 1 1 5 , 1 2 1 , 1 2 2, 1 2 5
,
-
3 8 1 4 1 , 1 4 2 1 4 4 , 1 4 5 , 1 7 0, 1 7 8 , 2 02
, , .
Lally Count 65
L awr e nce , Sir Henry 7 0, 8 2 , 2 1 2 , 2 1 6 , 2 2 9 .
M acaulay 1 97
M a c P h e r s o n , Sir John 72
M a d h a v a Rao Sin d hia 5 4, 59 , 6 0, 6 1 7 3, 7 9 , ,
1 1 9 , 1 2 0 2 00 , .
M ahomed Ali 8, 81 99 ,
1 4 5 , 1 4 9 , 1 5 0, 1 52 , 1 5 7 , 1 6 2 , 1 6 3, 1 6 4 , 1 6 5,
1 69 1 7 0, 1 8 3, 1 8 5 , 1 8 7 ,
,
M alet 7 8 , 7 9 1 03 1 4 1 , ,
M alleson Col . 2 0 2 1 , 3 6 6 2 , 6 3, 1 2 3 2 3 5 , , ,
M or a t h a s 3 2 , 5 2 6 1 6 5 , 9 0, 1 02 1 42 , 1 4 8 , 1 4 9 , 1 5 8
- -
2 35
M ars h man 2 1 6, 2 1 7
'
M eer Jafie r 5 , 1 4 1 5, 1 9, ,
2 5, 2 7 , 2 s ,
29 , 3 1 , 4 2 44 , 1 9 3 , .
M eer Kas im 1 4 , 2 8 , 2 9, 31 , 4 2 ,
IN DE x 255
2 2 7 , 2 37
M ill J a m es
, 2 2 4, 33 5 0, 7 5 9 1 , 1 1 1 , 1 1 7 , 1 3 7
, , ,
M on s o n C o l . 1 28 9 , 1 3 0, 1 3 1 1 32 1 33 1 3 5
-
, , ,
M ostyn 5 4 5 6 , 5 7 5 8, 7 9 -
, .
M ysore 6 2 6 7 4 7 5 88 9 0, 9 1 , 1 1 4 , 1 5 2 1 8 1
-
, . ,
-
N a dir Sh a h 6 9 , 7 0, 7 1
N a j i mu d d a ul a h
-
44 4 6 7 ,
-
Nana Fa d n a v i s 5 4, 5 7 5 8 6 0 6 1 , 6 5 6 6 7 5 , , , , , ,
7 9, 8 0 1 03 4 ,
-
N a n d ku m a r 18 3 1 , 42 ,
N epal 1 5 4 5 6 1 9 5 1 9 6 , 2 05 2 3 5 -
, , ,
Nizam , The 5 4 6 2 6 5 6 7 9 , 7 4 8 0, 8 4 8 5 8
, , ,
-
, ,
-
8 9 , 9 0 1 08 9 1 1 6 2 05 , 2 28 2 2 9
,
-
, , ,
O my ch a n d 1 1 , 1 3, 1 8, 1 9, 2 0
O o d w a n ulla h 38
O ude 3 1 , 3 9 7 0 7 3 8 1 , 9 2 9 5 1 04 1 5 4
, , , , , , ,
1 7 0, 1 7 8 , 1 8 2 , 2 06 , 2 2 8 , 3 1 2 3 5 -
O wen Sydney 32
P a get , Sir Edw a rd ,
1 7 5, 1 7 7
Palm er CO . 173
Peel 1 9 1 , 2 06 , 2 09
Penal C ode , 1 90
Perman ent Revenue Settlement 77
Perron 1 1 4, 1 2 1 ,
Persia 1 4 9 , 1 50 1 5 1 , 1 9 8 , ,
1 59 1 6 1 , 1 6 5 , 1 6 6 ,
Pindaris , The 1 57 17 0
Pitt 8 3, 1 08, 1 3 9
Port u guese , The 4, 5, 6 , 1 3
P ou s t a 5 3,
2 56 H I S T O RY OE T HE BRITI S H .
OU
R a g h o ba 5 3 5 4, 5 6 , 5 7 , 5 8 , 6 0, 6 1 , 8 6 , 1 07 ,
1 9 3, 2 04 , 2 1 0, 2 1 3, 2 1 6 , 2 1 7
Resident s B riti sh ,
1 09 , 1 1 0 1 1 3 1 1 4 , 1 1 5 1 1 6 , 1 2 4
, , , 1 26 1 29 1 31
, , , ,
1 3 2, 1 3 9 , 1 4 2, 1 4 4, 1 4 5 1 4 9 . 1 57 1 5 9 , 1 7 8
-
.
1 9 9 2 04 -
Seir u l M u t a g ue r i n
- -
4 1 , 4 2 , 4 6 , 4 8 , 6 8, 7 0
Shah Alam 36 , 4 1, 4 5 , 1 1 5 1 2 2 , 24 1
-
Shah Shuj a 1 4 9 , 1 5 1 , 1 84 , 1 9 1 9 2 1 9 3 -
Sheridan
Shitab Rai 49
S hi v aj i 52 , 5 3, 5 7 , 6 1 , 6 5, 6 6, 9 8 , 1 07 1 5 7 1 7 0 , ,
Shuj a u d d a u l a h
- -
36 ,
Sikhs 2 00 2 04 05 , 2 07 2 1 1 , 2 1 2 2 1 9 , ,
- - -
Sikkim 1 55
Sin dh , Ameers of 1 49, 1 5 0, 1 5 6 , 1 6 0 1 8 3 1 8 4 , , ,
1 9 3, 1 9 7 1 99 ,
Sleeman Col .
Somro
Spe n cer Herbert 2 32 .
Subsi d i a r y Allian ce 1 0, 5 3 8 5 , 1 4 5
. .
Surat 1 01 , 1 02 .
Tipu . 74 , 88 1 04 1 46 , 1 5 6
.
Tod C ol James
, . 1 58 .
Torrens ,
I N DEX 2 57
Travan core ,
7 4 , 7 5 , 1 09 .
T REA T Y O F
Alinagar
Bassein 1 08 1 1 2 ,
-
IIa d r a s
M an g a lore
M onghyr
M un d i s o o r
Puran dhar
S a lb y e 6 1 , 6 5,
Seri n gapatam
Surat
S u r j i A r j a n g a on 1 44
Tre v ely an S i r George
, 1
T r i m b u c kj e e D a n g li a 1 6 1 1 62 ,
Trotter Captain
, 21 6
V ellore M utiny at
, 1 4 5 1 4 6 , 1 80, 2 2 1 .
1 1 3, 1 1 6 1 1 7 , 1 2 3 1 2 5 , 1 6 0
, ,
Wellesley Henry , 84 , 9 3 9 4, 9 5 ,
Wheeler T a l bo y s
, 47 , 5 1
Wi lks 7 4, 7 5
W i lson 1 1 , 1 1 4, 1 3 7 , 1 8 9
Z e b n u Nissa Be g um
- -
, 1 14
E RR ATA
error correction
28 l as t line a m r ch e d marched
40 4 l i nes fro m botto m ser v eral se ve r al
80 1 9 lin es Ni z an Ni z am
fr ench French
92 13 d e spa r a t e des p erate
1 53 1 s t ar a las t th ree l i nes o mi t
4 t h us fro m botto m B ur ke s
o
1 69 B e n ke
’ ’
s
171 last l i ne f utu r e fortune
2 n d l i n e f r o m bottom f r om f or m
1 78 6th T h one T h r one
2 0th line fro m t op aft er p eo pl e reference
‘
178 ’ ~
N o 2 05
. .
17 9 l s t line o f p a g e
. B en t i n k B enti n ck
1 8 1 2 n d l i n e fro m bo t t o m after manag em ent referen ce
‘ ’
No 2 1 0
. .
1 88
1 92 9th B ur us B ur n e s
1 93 1 4t h T h oug h T hroug h
1 94 4th an ou r
1 97 9t h Sy n d S ind
1 98 la st l i n e charg e d ch arg e
2 01 1 0t h l i n e fro m botto m as on
2 06 last line t h re a t r e th eatre
211 1 4 t h l ine fro m b o t t o m Wi th W it h
4 t h li n e office o ffice r
2 17 p ga e t itle D ac h a n s 1 e D a l h g u s i e
2 23 T i t le A q u1 3 1 t i on s A cq ui s i t i ons
23 1 l i ne 4 Armo d A rnold