Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reducing Tire Induce
Reducing Tire Induce
Kikuchi1
REFERENCE: Yilmaz, C., Hulbert, G. M., and Kikuchi, N., ‘‘Reducing Tire-Induced Noise
and Vibration,’’ Tire Science and Technology, TSTCA, Vol. 34, No. 2, April – June 2006, pp.
135-147.
ABSTRACT: Tire-induced noise and vibration spans a wide range of frequencies, depending
on, among other attributes, tread design, road surface, and vehicle speed. Vehicle designers are
faced with the daunting task of minimizing this broad frequency of energy. The design of
suspension systems must take into account the need to have a well-tuned frequency response.
In this paper, a new approach toward minimizing tire-induced noise and vibration is
presented. The methodology is based upon a new perspective of employing antiresonance, as
opposed to damping phenomena, to effectively tune systems for practical performance. The
mechanical structure of the system is amenable to cost-effective manufacture and can be
packaged in different configurations. We present the fundamental approach toward the design
and give several example configurations.
KEY WORDS: noise and vibration isolation, passive suspension design, antiresonance
Introduction
Tire-induced noise and vibration is one of the major sources of noise and
vibration in automobiles at highway driving speeds. There are various causes
for the noise and vibration generated by the tire/road interaction, e.g., road
surface roughness, tread impacts. Moreover, these vibrations can be amplified
due to both tire and suspension component resonances. As a result of these
various sources at different frequencies, tire-induced noise and vibration spans a
wide range of frequencies.
There are two main paths that transmit tire-induced noise and vibration into
the vehicle cabin. The first path is the structure-borne path in which the noise
and vibration are transmitted via the suspension system. The second path is the
air-borne path in which the noise is radiated to the atmosphere, which then
excites the exterior body panels, and consequently engenders noise in the ve-
hicle cabin. However, the structure-borne path usually is the dominant source of
noise and vibration in the vehicle cabin 关1兴. Consequently, this path is the focus
of this paper.
In automotive suspension systems, vibration isolation generally is achieved
by passive means. There are active suspension systems, but these systems prin-
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2250 G. G. Brown, Ann Arbor,
Michigan 48109-2125.
2
Presented at the twenty fourth annual meeting of the Tire Society, Akron, Ohio, September 20–21,
2005.
135
136 TIRE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
FIG. 1 — 2-DOF quarter-car model. ms is the sprung mass, mus is the unsprung mass, ks is the
suspension spring stiffness, cs is the damping coefficient of the damper, ktr is the tire stiffness (tire
damping is neglected), x2 is the displacement of ms, x1 is the displacement of mus, and y is the
displacement due to road surface roughness.
cipally are used for controlling low-frequency body modes 关2兴. Essentially,
passive suspension design is a pole 共resonance frequency兲 placement problem in
which the mass, stiffness, and damping of suspension components are adjusted
to obtain the desired frequency response 关3–5兴.
In this paper, a new approach is introduced to minimize tire-induced noise
and vibration. The methodology is based upon using an antiresonance phenom-
enon. Antiresonance has been utilized in automotive hydraulic engine mounts
共HEMs兲 for improved vibration isolation and damping characteristics which
cannot be attained by rubber mounts 关6–9兴. It has also been used in the aero-
space industry for isolating helicopter rotor systems 关10–13兴. The aim of the
present work is to utilize antiresonance in passive suspension systems to reduce
high-frequency tire-induced noise and vibration.
FIG. 2 — Transmissibility plot of the 2-DOF quarter-car model for ms = 454 kg, mus = 45.4 kg,
ktr = 176 kN/ m, ks = 22 kN/ m, cs = 2.2 kN s / m.
is not the case for actual suspension systems 关1,5兴. There are various internal
resonances at high frequencies and the 2-DOF model is not capable of capturing
these internal resonances.
FIG. 3 — 4-DOF quarter-car model. ms is the sprung mass, mus is the unsprung mass, ks is the
suspension spring stiffness, cs is the damping coefficient of the damper, ktr is the tire stiffness with
loss factor ␥, x4 is the displacement of ms, and y is the displacement due to road surface roughness.
FIG. 4 — Transmissibility plot of the 4-DOF quarter-car model for ms = 454 kg, mus = 45.4 kg,
ktr = 176(1 + 0.1i)kN/ m, ks = 22 kN/ m, cs = 2.2 kN s / m.
type rotor isolation systems. For simplicity, a mechanical lever will be used in
modeling the antiresonant vibration isolator. Figure 5 displays the lumped pa-
rameter model of an undamped antiresonant vibration isolator.
Assume that the lever rod is massless and rigid; the spring is linear, mass-
less, and undamped. Then, the system is SDOF. Moreover, assume that the
oscillations are small. Then, linear theory is applicable, generating the equation
for z in terms of x and y as
z = ␣x − 共␣ − 1兲y, where ␣ = l1/12 ⬎ 1, 共4兲
resulting in the equation of motion
FIG. 5 — Base excited lever-type antiresonant vibration isolator. y is the displacement of the base,
x is the displacement of the load, z is the displacement of the isolator mass, k is the mount stiffness,
m is the mass of the load, mis is the isolator mass, l1 is the length of the lever, and l2 is the distance
between two pivot points.
YILMAZ ET AL. ON REDUCING TIRE-INDUCED NOISE 141
z =
0
冑␣共␣ − 1兲 = 冑 k
mis␣共␣ − 1兲
. 共6兲
p =
0
冑1 + ␣2 = 冑 k
m + mis␣2
. 共7兲
FIG. 6 — Transmissibility plots of lever-type antiresonant vibration isolator (solid line) and SDOF
mass spring (dashed line) where r = / 0.
FIG. 7 — 5-DOF quarter-car model. ms is the sprung mass, mus is the unsprung mass, mis is the
isolator mass, ks is the suspension spring stiffness, cs is the damping coefficient of the damper, ktr is
the tire stiffness with loss factor ␥, kis is the isolator stiffness, x5 is the displacement of ms, and y is
the displacement due to road surface roughness.
order to make fair comparisons among the various examples, the overall system
stiffness will be held constant. First of all, let us denote the stiffness ratio kis / ks
as . In the 4-DOF quarter-car model, ks was equal to 22 kN/ m. In the 5-DOF
antiresonant quarter-car model, let ks = 共1 + 共1 / 兲兲 ⫻ 22 kN/ m, kis = 共1 + 兲
⫻ 22 kN/ m so that 1 / 共共1 / ks兲 + 共1 / kis兲兲 = 22 kN/ m while kis / ks = . As a result,
both systems have the same overall stiffness. Furthermore, let cs = 关1 + 共1 / 兲兴
⫻ 2.2 kN. s / m so that the increase in ks is commensurately balanced with an
increase in cs.
In the first example, we try to cancel the first internal resonance frequency
of the tire by placing the antiresonance frequency at that frequency. For this
case, ␣ = 3.3, mis = 0.5 kg, and kis / ks = 100. Different sets of mis and ␣ could be
used to place the antiresonance frequency; however, these values are chosen
such that the lever ratio, ␣, and the isolator mass, mis, are not large. In this case,
ks = 1.01⫻ 22 kN/ m, kis = 101⫻ 22 kN/ m, cs = 1.01⫻ 2.2 kN s / m, and the other
parameters 共ms, mus, ktr兲 are the same as before. Figure 8 displays the transmis-
sibility plots of the two systems. It can be seen that the first internal resonance
frequency is canceled. Furthermore, one can see that the resonance peak is not
only removed, but there is also a notch in its place. Hence, a higher resonance
peak could also be canceled with the antiresonance frequency.
144 TIRE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
FIG. 8 — Transmissibility plots of the 4-DOF quarter-car model (solid line) and the 5-DOF anti-
resonant quarter-car model (dashed line) for ␣ = 3.3, mis = 0.5 kg, and kis / ks = 100.
FIG. 9 — Transmissibility plots of the 4-DOF quarter-car model (solid line) and the 5-DOF anti-
resonant quarter-car model (dashed line) for ␣ = 2.17, mis = 0.5 kg, and kis / ks = 100.
YILMAZ ET AL. ON REDUCING TIRE-INDUCED NOISE 145
FIG. 10 — Transmissibility plots of the 4-DOF quarter-car model (solid line) and the 5-DOF anti-
resonant quarter-car model (dashed line) for ␣ = 1.35, mis = 0.5 kg, and kis / ks = 10.
displays the transmissibility plots of the 4-DOF quarter-car model and the
5-DOF antiresonant quarter-car model. It can be seen that the second internal
resonance frequency is canceled.
We can try to decrease the effect of both resonance frequencies by choosing
␣ between 2.17 and 3.3. However, the resonance frequencies will not be can-
celed; only the peaks will be reduced. In order to increase the effect of the
antiresonance frequency in decreasing both peaks, the ratio kis / ks must be de-
creased. The antiresonance frequency is placed in the middle of the two reso-
nance frequencies by choosing ␣ = 1.35, mis = 0.5 kg, and kis / ks = 10. In this case,
ks = 1.1⫻ 22 kN/ m, kis = 11⫻ 22 kN/ m, cs = 1.1⫻ 2.2 kN s / m, and the other pa-
rameters are the same as before. Figure 10 displays the transmissibility plots of
the 4-DOF quarter-car model and the 5-DOF antiresonant quarter-car model. It
can be seen that both resonance peaks are considerably lowered. However, due
to decreasing the kis / ks ratio, the low-frequency response slightly deteriorated
共around 10 Hz兲.
The kis / ks ratio can be decreased even further to achieve better high-
frequency isolation. For example, we let ␣ = 2.3, mis = 0.05 kg, and kis / ks = 4.
Notice that a smaller mis is used in this case. Consequently, the value of ␣ is
increased, but this value is easily realizable. In this case, ks = 1.25⫻ 22 kN/ m,
kis = 5 ⫻ 22 kN/ m, cs = 1.25⫻ 2.2 kN s / m, and the other parameters are the same
as before. Figure 11 displays the transmissibility plots of the 4-DOF quarter-car
model and the 5-DOF antiresonant quarter-car model. It can be seen that both
146 TIRE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
FIG. 11 — Transmissibility plots of the 4-DOF quarter-car model (solid line) and the 5-DOF anti-
resonant quarter-car model (dashed line) for ␣ = 2.3, mis = 0.05 kg, and kis / ks = 4.
resonance peaks are further lowered. However, due to decreasing the kis / ks
ratio, the low-frequency response deteriorated more 共both peaks around 1 and
10 Hz have increased兲.
One can extend the use of antiresonance to higher degree-of-freedom sus-
pension models. In these cases, the antiresonance frequency can be placed in the
frequency range of the most problematic resonances. Moreover, by adjusting the
suspension parameters, optimum designs that achieve high-frequency isolation
with good low-frequency response can be obtained.
Construction of antiresonant suspension systems would be similar to regu-
lar passive suspension systems except for the antiresonant isolator stage and
some dimensional changes to accommodate it. Since small lever ratios and
masses are utilized in the antiresonant stage, it would not occupy a large space.
The antiresonant stage can be realized by systems having hydraulic leverage as
in the case of HEMs or mechanical leverage as in the case of helicopter rotor
isolators. Since these systems are inherently simple compared to active suspen-
sion systems, they promise to be much more cost effective.
Conclusion
small isolator masses and easily realizable lever ratios are utilized. Furthermore,
stiffness is not compromised to achieve isolation.
It has been demonstrated that one can place an antiresonance frequency on
any of the internal resonance frequencies of the tire to cancel it. If the stiffness
of the antiresonant stage is high compared to the rest of the suspension system,
then there is negligible change in the low-frequency response. Furthermore, by
decreasing the relative stiffness of the antiresonant stage, one can improve the
high-frequency isolation characteristics. However, this improvement comes
with a decreasing low-frequency performance. Therefore, one should select the
optimum stiffness ratio that both satisfy low-frequency performance require-
ments and high-frequency isolation requirements.
References
关1兴 Pottinger, M. G., Marshall, K. D., Lawther, J. M., and Thrasher, D. B., “A review of Tire/
Pavement Interaction Induced Noise and Vibration,” The Tire Pavement Interface, ASTM STP
929, M. G. Pottinger and T. J. Yager, Eds. American Society for Testing and Materials, Phila-
delphia, 1986, pp. 183–287.
关2兴 Karnopp, D., “Active and Semi-Active Vibration Isolation,” Transactions of American Society
of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 117, 1995, pp. 177–185.
关3兴 Wong, J. Y., Theory of Ground Vehicles, 2nd ed., Wiley, 1993.
关4兴 Alkhatib, R., Jazar, G. N., and Golnaraghi, M. F., “Optimal Design of Passive Linear Suspen-
sion Using Genetic Algorithm,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 275, 2004, pp. 665–691.
关5兴 Kido, I., Nakamura, A., Hayashi, T., and Asai, M., “Suspension Vibration Analysis for Road
Noise Using Finite Element Model,” SAE Technical Paper Series, No. 1999–01–1788, 1999.
关6兴 Corcoran, P. E. and Ticks, G. E., “Hydraulic Engine Mount Characteristics,” SAE Paper No.
840407, 1984.
关7兴 Flower, W. C., “Understanding Hydraulic Mounts for Improved Vehicle Noise, Vibration and
Ride Qualities,” SAE Paper, No. 850975, 1985.
关8兴 Yu, Y., Naganathan, N. G., and Dukkipati, R. V., “A Literature Review of Automotive Vehicle
Engine Mounting Systems,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2001, pp. 123–
142.
关9兴 Jazar, G. N. and Golnaraghi, M. F., “Engine Mounts for Automotive Applications: A Survey,”
Shock and Vibration Digest, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2002, pp. 363–379.
关10兴 Flannelly, W. G., “Dynamic Antiresonant Vibration Isolator,” U.S. Patent No. 3,322,379, 1967.
关11兴 Desjardins, R. A. and Hooper, W. E., “Antiresonant Rotor Isolation for Vibration Reduction,”
Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1980, pp. 46–55.
关12兴 Braun, D., “Development of Antiresonance Force Isolators for Helicopter Vibration Reduc-
tion,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1982, pp. 37–44.
关13兴 McGuire, D. P., “High Stiffness 共“Rigid”兲 Helicopter Pylon Vibration Isolation Systems,”
American Helicopter Society 59th Annual Forum, Phoenix, Arizona, May 6–8, 2003.