Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pratyaksha,: Indian Perspective-Praman
Pratyaksha,: Indian Perspective-Praman
'aman:
alidation of Knowledge
of Indian
Logic and the philosophy of understanding the laws person crying, etc.
In Indian knowledge. According to Nyaya philosophy, the term anumana
through whichphilosophy,
the word
true and accurate represents.all the means literally means after knowledge, i.e., knowledge
that
càn be knowledge
obtained. Different school of about the world follows other knowledge.It is mediate and indirect
have varied
a
number of means thoughts and
philosophies and are arranged throughthe medium of some mark
the sense of the
world. As per the through which one can make which is called 'hetu' and bears the relation of invariable
Vedas
are six in
number.
Therefore, philosophy,
there is the valid Pramanas concomitance with the observed feature.
The basis of
knowledge
use
available to us and
we should be
means of the inference is invariably concomitance.
The invariable
various faculties of careful enough to is called Vyapti.
mind to arrive between the hetu and the sadya
at the true relation
knowledge. The knowledge of the qualities of the'paksa through the
is
or anumana
hetu' is called pramasra. Hence inference
of Knowled
From Indian Perspective Pramo 85
Validation
said to be knowledge
gained through paramasr
sra, or in moment, we can conclude that there is no student in
other words,
the knowledge ot the presence of. the class.
through
paksa
the linga, which is the sadhya
qualit of Shabda Pramana (Word or Verbal Testimony): This is
in the
relatedby Vyapti. 6. verbal testimony. A lot of knowledge
paksa and is invariably gained through
world is through verbal
pamana Pramana (Comparisor or Analogy): Th
Upar
that we gain about the
3. or words. It is either utered or
is acquired by the percent. testimony, texts, symbol
kind of knowledge of verbal testimony must have a valid source
similarity between two ditterent objects of knowledo. written. A
of knowledge to be true. In ancient times,
tis different from mere perceptionand inference andis for its object
considered to be the most authentic source
based on a comparison.
For example, person wha has
a Vedas were
the Indian philosophers. Some
of
of knowledge by
most
known that a four-legged animal that barks is called a
philosophers totally rejected this idea and
dog in his village. When this person goes to the junele western
context-based knowledge. This also opened
and sees a similar looking animal which barks, he can called for
there can be various sources of knowing
say that "this wild dog is like the dog in my village" the debate that on the
or "the dog in my village is like this wild dog," Such objects and its validity and reliability depends
well as the context. In modern days, we rely
knowledge is possible when there is a prior familiarity source as
books, journals, TV news, etc. to form
with a particular thing which lets the person compare onnewspapers,
or opinion.
both the things based on the known familiarity. our object of knowledge
discussed above, it must
to all the pramanas
4 Arthapatti Pramana (Assumption or Implication): With regard s o m e field can impart
valid
an expert in
Knowledge gained through seeing the relation between be noted that only
about that subject.
cause and effect are Arthapatti knowledge
pramana. It includes
postulation, supposition, and resumption. This form of Educational Implications of
Pramans
knowledge is either gained from what we have seen and analytical approach
a logical
or are
assuming rightly. For example, a healthy person The Nyaya, being mainly aim at sensory and
education should
says that he doesn't sleep at night. From this holds that
proposition to the world school also aims at
Besides this, the
ve can
postulate that this person sleeps during the day. intellectual training. as well
Without this a balanced
life. Both cognitive
assumption, it is not
possible to a good and
why this person is healthy and alive without explain developing
faculties are needed to be developed
according to
as conative
Assumption and implication are very useful sleeping. Nyaya's concept
of education.
to make
logical arguments about the world. concepts of perception is a
fundamental
concern
their
for meaning through
in the The Nyaya's
Because we cannot class, there is no water in the class. 22. doctrine proves that they
loved
epistemological
perceive student in the class at the
From Indian Perspective Praman:
Validation of Knowledge
-
4 Problem-centred method can be used in thought accept the authority of the Vedas while viewing the
teaching, nature of knowledge but the Heterodox Schools of thought
5. Analogy (upamana) is usedin all
knowledge.
comparative do not recognize
knowledge
of the Vedas. The sources of
the authority
according to Indian philosophy are perception,
0. Verbal testimony (Sabda) can include senminar, inference, verbal testimony, analogy, presumption and non-
discussion and lecture method. group
existence.