Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rule 39 Execution, Satisfaction and Effect of Judgement (Rule 39)
Rule 39 Execution, Satisfaction and Effect of Judgement (Rule 39)
The writ of execution must conform to the dispositive portion of the decision
to be executed and the execution is void if it is in excess of and beyond the
original judgment or award for it is a settled general principle that a writ of
execution must conform strictly to every essential particulars of the
judgment promulgated (Ex-Bataan Veterans Security Agency, Inc. vs. N:LRC 250
SCRA 418; Equatorial Realty Development Inc. vs. Mayfair Theatre Inc. 332
SCRA 139; Banquerigo vs. CA GR 164633 August 7, 2006).
Thus, if the judgment does not provide for the payment of interest, the writ
of execution cannot modify the judgment by requiring the judgment obligor
to pay interest. That part of the writ imposing interest is void (Solidbank
Corp. vs. CA 379 SCRA 159).
“While the rule is that a stay of execution of a final judgment may be
authorized if necessary to accomplish the ends of justice, as for instance,
where there has been a change in the situation of the parties which makes
such execution inequitable, nevertheless the said rule cannot be invoked
when the supposed change in the circumstances of the parties took place
while the case was pending, for the reason that there was then no excuse
for not bringing to the attention of the court the fact or circumstance that
affects the outcome of the case.”
We are of course well aware of the rule authorizing the court to modify or
alter a judgment even after the same has become executory, whenever
circumstances transpire rendering its execution unjust and inequitable.
However, this rule, we must emphasize, applies only to cases where the facts
or circumstances authorizing such modification or alteration transpired after
the judgment has become final executory.”
As to their nature:
1.) COMPULSORY execution (Execution as a Matter of Right (Section 1)
What are the conditions for compulsory execution?
The following are the conditions:
A. FIRST CONDITION: It is a judgment or an order that has disposed
already of the action or proceeding;
B. SECOND CONDITION: The period to appeal has expired and no appeal
has been filed/taken from the judgment. In other words it has already
become final and executor.
Once a judgment becomes final and executory, the prevailing party can have
it executed as a matter of right, and the issuance of a writ of execution
becomes the ministerial duty of the court (Buaya vs. Stronghold
Insurance Co., Inc. 342 SCRA 576). Once a decision becomes final and
executory, it is the ministerial duty of the presiding judge to issue a writ
of execution except in certain cases, as when subsequent events would
render execution of judgment unjust (Mangahas vs. Paredes GR 157866
February 14, 2007).
May the court refuse to execute a judgment on the ground that the judgement was
wrong or erroneous?
NO, because it is a matter of right and the issuance of the corresponding
writ of execution upon a final and executory judgment is a ministerial duty of the
court to execute which is compellable by mandamus. (Ebero vs. Cañizares, 79 Phil.
152)
Sec.2, Rule 39
What are the requirements in order that execution pending appeal can be
made?
Execution of a judgment or final order pending appeal may be ordered by the court
subject to its discretion, even before the expiration of the period to appeal subject to
the following conditions:
1. On motion of the prevailing party;
2. With notice to the adverse party filed in the trial court while it has jurisdiction over
the case; and
3. It is in the possession of either the original record o the record on appeal, as he
case may be, at the time of the filing of such motion, said court may, in its
discretion order execution of a judgment or final order even before the expiration
of the period to appeal.
The motion for execution pending appeal may be filed the appellate court.
Prior to transmittal of records of the case, the trial court does not lose
jurisdiction over the case and in fact, may issue an order for execution pending
appeal [under] Sec. 9, Rule 41 of the Rules of Court.
Despite the filing of a petition with the CA, however, Rule 42 grants the RTC
residual jurisdiction to order execution pending appeal, so long as (1) the CA
has not yet given due course to the petition, and (2) the requirements of Sec.
2, Rule 29 are observed.
Discretionary execution may only issue upon good reasons to be stated in a
special order after due hearing.
The existence of “good reason” for the immediate execution of a judgment is
an indispensable requirement as this is what confers discretionary power on a
court to issue a writ of execution pending appeal.
b) Several, Separate or Partial Judgment
Sec. 3, Rule 39
Discretionary execution issued under the preceding section may be stayed subject
to the following conditions, to wit:
1. Upon approval by the proper court of a sufficient supersedeas bond filed by
the party against whom it is directed;
2. Conditioned upon the performance of the judgment or order allowed to b
executed in case it shall be finally sustained in whole or in part;
3. The bond thus given may be proceeded against on motion with notice to the
surety.
Note
GENERAL RULE:
When a defendant puts up a supersedeas bond, the court shall recall
the execution pending appeal because discretionary execution is the
exception rather than the general rule.
EXCEPTION:
Notwithstanding the filing of the supersedeas bond by the appellant,
execution pending appeal may still be granted by the court IF THERE ARE
SPECIAL AND COMPELLING REASONS justifying the same outweighing the
security offered by the supersedeas bond. (De Leon vs. Soriano, 95
Phil. 806) ( judgment for support)
Judgments in actions for injunction are not stayed by appeals in taken therefrom.
On appeal therefrom, the appellate court in its discretion may take an order
suspensing, modifying, restoring or granting the injunction, receivership,
accounting or award of support.
The stay of execution shall be upon such terms as to bond or otherwise as may be
considered proper for the security or protection of the rights of the adverse party.
The judgment for the Regional Trial Court in an appealed case for forcible entry or
unlawful detainer shall be immediately executory, without prejudice to a further
appeal that may be taken therefrom.
Immediately executory judgment may be appealed but the appeal does not stay
the execution of the judgment or final order whereas judgment or final order which
is immediately final and executory may not be appealed.
The following are judgments/ final orders whch are immediately final and
executory:
1. Judgmnets in summary judicial proceedings in the Family Code;
2. Judgments for Direct contempt;
3. Compromise judgments;
4. Judgments in cases covered by Rules on Small Claims Cases
Read
Inutan vs Napar Contracting and Allied Services, November 25, 2015
Sec. 5, Rule 39
Where the executed judgment is reversed totally or partially, or annulled, on
appeal or otherwise, the trial court may, on motion, issue such orders of
restitution o reparation of damages as equality and justice may warrant under
the circumstances.
if the writ of execution was manifestly void is it without any legal effect, and it
is as if no writ was issued at all, and consequently, all actions taken pursuant to
Note
You can file your motion for execution pending appeal before:
1.) TRIAL COURT - while it has jurisdiction over the case and the court is still in
possession of the records of the case; (2.) the court still is in possession of the
records of the case( original record or record on appeal).
2.) APPELLATE COURT – after the trial court has already lost jurisdiction, the motion
for execution pending appeal may already be filed in the appellate court.
When does court lose jurisdiction?
In appeals by notice of appeal, the trial court loses juridction over the case
of: Upon perfection of the appeal filed in due time and upon expiration of
the time to appeal of the other parties;
In appeals by record on appeal, the trial court loses jurisdiction over the
subject matter of the record on appeal: upon approval of the record on
appeal filed in due time and upon expiration of the time to appeal of the
other parties.
Sec. 6, Rule 39
The purpose of the law in prescribing time limitations for enforcing judgment or
actions is to prevent obligors from sleeping on their rights.
How can execution be made within five (5) years?
Once a judgment becomes final and executor, the prevailing party can have it
executed as a matter of right by mere motion within five (5) years from the date of
entry of judgment.
What are the acts to be accomplished by the judgment creditor in order
that execution by motion be valid?
The judgment creditor must ensure the accomplishment of two acts within the five-
year prescriptive period which are the filing of the motion for the issuance of the
writ of execution, and the court’s actual issuance of the writ.
What are the excluded periods in computing the time for enforcing the
judgment?
Any interruption or delay occasioned by the debtor will extend the time within
which the writ may be issued without scire facias, such as by agreement of the
parties for a definite time, by injunction, by the taking of an appeal or writ of error
so as to operate as a supersedeas, by the death of a party or otherwise.
The five (5) year period may be extended when there is a delay caused by the
actions of the judgment obligor for his benefit or advantage.
What is the remedy in case the judgment is not enforce within five (5)
years from finality?
As mandated by Sec. 6, Rule 39, if the prevailing party fails to have the decision by
a motion after the lapse of five years, the said judgment is reduced to a right of
action which must be enforced by the institution of a complaint in a regular court
within 10 years from the time the judgment becomes final.
What is the revival judgment?
A remedy to enforce judgment by means of the institution of a complaint in the
regular form, not for the purpose of reexamining and retrying issues already
decided upon, but for the purpose of reviving and enforcing the judgment originally
The purpose of the new action is not to reexamine and retry issues already
decided and the cause of action of this new action is the judgment to be revived
and no identity of causes of action can be said to exist between the first and the
second actions (Caina vs. CA GR 114393 Dec. 14 1994). The consideration of any issue
affecting matters that could have been raised in the previous case must be deemed
as definitely foreclosed (Phil. Reconstruction Corp. Inc. Vs. Aparente 45 SCRA 217).
Dormant judgment is one that has not been enforced/ executed by motion within 5
While this ruling was abandoned in PNB vs. Deloso 23 SCRA 266 and Luzon
Surety Co. Inc. vs. IAC GR 72645 June 30, 1987, which held that the ten-year
period should run from the finality of the original judgment and not from the
finality of the revived judgment, the ruling in Bondoc was resurrected in the
present provision of Section 6 which declares in its last sentence that “The
revived judgment may also be enforced by motion within five (5) years from
the date of its entry and thereafter by action before it is barred by the
statute of limitations.”
The SC had long ago ruled that after the lapse of five (5) years, the
judgment “is reduced to a mere right of action in favor of the person whom
it favors which must be enforced, as are all ordinary actions, by the
institution of a complaint in the regular form” (Compana General de Tobacos
vs. Martinez and Nolan 29 Phil. 515; Aldeguer vs. Gemelo 68 Phil. 421).
Sec. 7, Rule 39
How will the execution be made in case of death of a party?
In case of the death or party, execution may issue or be enforced in the following
manner, to wit.
1. In case of the death of judgments obligee, upon the application of his
executor or administrator, or successor in interest;
2. In case of the death of the judgment obligor, against his executor or
administrator or successor in interest, if the judgment be for the recovery of
real or personal property, or the enforcement of the lien thereon;
3. In case of the death of judgment obligor, after execution is actually levied
upon any of his property, the same may be sold for the satisfaction of the
Where will the monetary claim against the person administering the estate be
made?
A monetary claim against the person administering an estate, in relation to his or
her acts of administration, in its ordinary course, can be filed at the court where a special
proceeding for the settlement of the estate is pending.
Sec. 8, Rule 39
How will the writ of execution be enforced?
The sheriff enforce the writ in the following manner:
1. If the execution be against the property of the judgment obligor, to satisfy the
judgment, with interest, out of the real or personal propertyof such judgment
obligor;
2. If it be against real or personal property in the hands of personal representatives,
heirs, devisees, legatees, tenants, or trustees of the judgment obligor, to satisfy
the judgment,with interest, out of such properties;
3. If it be for the sale of real or personal property, to sell such property, describing it,
and apply the proceeds in conformity with the judgment, the material parts of
which shall be recited in the writ of execution;
4. If it be for the delivery of the possession of real or personal property, to deliver the
possession of the same, describing it, to the party entitled thereto, and to satisfy
any costs, damages, rents or profits covered by the ugment out of the personal
property of the person against whom it was rendered, and if sufficient personal
property cannot be found, then out of the real property; and
5. In all cases, the writ of execution shall specifically state the amount of the interest,
costs, damages, rents, or profits due as of th date of the issuance of the writ, aside
from the principal obligation under the judgment. For this purpose, the motion for
execution shall specify the amounts of the foregoing reliefs sought by the movant.
The grounds for the quashal of the writ of execution shall be as follows, to wit:
What is the nature of the duty of the sheriff to implement the writ of
execution?
Well settled that the sheriff’s duty in the execution of a writ is purely ministreal; he is to
execute the order of the court strictly to the letter. He has no discretion whether to
execute the judgment or not.
Sec. 9, Rule 39
The officer shall enforce an execution of a judgment for money by demanding from the
judgment obligor the immediate payment of the full amount stated in the writ of
execution and all lawful fees.
What are the duties of the judgment obligor upon receipt of the demand from
the sheriff?
1. Pay in cash, certified bank check payable to the judgment oblige or his
authorized representative if present at the time of payment.
2. The lawful fees shall be hand under proper receipt to the executing sheriff
who shall turn over the said amount within the same day to the clerk of court
of the court that issued the writ.
The first crucial step in the execution of money judgments is a valid demand on
the judgment obligor, usually via a valid service of the writ of execution.
What is the rule in case the judgment oblige or his representative is not
present to receive payment?
What are the duties of the clerk of court upon deposit of the payment by the
sheriff?
The clerk of court upon deposit of the payment by the sheriff, shall perform the
following:
1. The clerk of court shall thereafter arrange for the remittance of the deposit to
the account of the court that issued a writ;
2. The clerk of court shall then deliver said payment to the judgment oblige in
satisfaction of the judgement;
3. The excess, if any, shall be delivered to the judgement obligor;
4. The lawful fees shall be retained by the clerk of court for disposition as
provided by law. In no case, shall the executing sheriff demand that any
payment by check be made payable to him.
What is Levy?
levy is the essential act by which a property is set apart for the satisfaction of
judgment and taken into the custody of the law, and that fter it has been taken
from defendant his interest is limited to its application to the judgment
irrespective of the time when it may be sold. (Balaquig vs. Southern Motors Inc.,
5049-R, May 19, 1976)
Levy on execution is a lien in favor of the judgment creditor over the right, title
and interest of the judgment debtor t the time of the levy. (Pacific Banking Corp.
vs. Policarpio, 64832-R, August 31, 1981)
A valid levy is essential to the validity of execution sale, any levy is invalid if the
notice of the levy of real property is not filed with the office of the register of
deeds.
What is the rule in case the judgment obligor cannot pay in full the monetary
judgement?
The judgment obligor is given the option to immediately choose which of his
property or part thereof, not otherwise exempt from execution, may be levied
upon sufficient to satisfy the judgment. Failure to avail the option, the sheriff can
In case the judgment debtor fails to choose which of his properties should be
levied upon, the sheriff must first levy on the judgment debtor’s personal
properties, if any and should such properties be insufficient, then the sheriff may
levy on the judgment debtor’s real properties.
What are the remedies of the sheriff if the obligor cannot pay the judgment in
full?
if the judgment obligor cannot pay all or part of the obligation in cash, certified
bank check or other mode of payment acceptable oblige, the officer shall:
1. Levy upon the properties of the judgment obligor of every kind and nature
whatsoever which may be disposed of for value and not otherwise exempt
from execution giving the latter the opinion to immediately choose which
property or part thereof may be levied upon, sufficient to satisfy the
judgment;
2. If the judgment obligor does not exercise the option, the officer shall first levy
on the personal properties, if any,and then on he real properties if the
personal properties are insufficient to answer for the judgment;
3. The sheriff shall sell only a sufficient portion of the personal or real property
of the judgment obligor which has been levied upon;
4. When there is more property of the judgment obligor than is sufficient to
satisfy the judgment and lawful fees, he must sell only so much of personal or
real property as is sufficient to satisfy the judgment and lawful fees.
Who has the option to choose which property may be levied upon?
The sheriff cannot and should not be the one to determine which property to
levy if the judgment obligor cannot immediately pay because it is the judgment
obligor who is given the option to choose which property or part thereof may be
levied upon to satisfy the judgment.
Real property, stocks, shares, debts, credits, and other personal property, or any
interest in either real or personal property, may be levied upon in like manner
and with like effect as under a writ of attachment.
Yes, a mortgaged property may still be levied upon by the sheriff to satisfy the judgment
debtor’s obligations.
To have a valid levy upon a real property, the sheriff should file with the register of
deeds, a copy of the order and description of the attached property and notice of
attachment; and leave with the occupant of the property a copy of the same order,
description and notice.
What is garnishment?
Garnishment is a warning to a person in whose hands the effect of another are attached,
not to pay the money or deliver the property of the defendants in his hands to him, but to
appear and answer the plaintiff;s suit. (Reliance Procoma Inc. vs. Phil-Asia Tobacco
Corporation, G.R. No. L-37656, May 31, 1974, 57 SCRA 374)
How can levy be made if the properties not capable of manual delivery is in
the hands of a third (3rd ) person?
The officer may levy on debts due the judgment obligor and other credits, including bank
deposits, financial interest, royalties, commission and other personal property not capable
of manual delivery in th possession or control or third parties. Levy shall be made by
serving notice upon the person owing such debts or having in his possession or control
such credits to which the judgment obligor is entitled.
The garnishment shall cover only such mount as will satisfy the judgment and all lawful
fees.
What are the duties of the garnishee after service of notice of garnishment?
1. Make a written report to the court within five (5) days from service of the
notice of garnishment stating whether or not the judgment obligor has
sufficient funds or credits to satisfy the amount of the judgment.
2. If not, the report shall state how much funds or credits the garnishee holds
for the judgment obligor.
3. The garnished amount in cash or certified bank check issued in the name of
the judgment oblige, shall be delivered directly to the judgment oblige within
10 working days from service of notice on said garnishing requiring such
delivery, except the lawful fees which shall be paid direct it to the court.
In the event there are two or more garnishees holding deposits or credits
sufficient to satisfy the judgment, the judgment obligor, if available, shall have
the right to indicate the garnishee or garnishees who shall be required to deliver
the amount due; otherwise, the choice shall be made by the judgment obligee.
A: The executing sheriff shall observe the same procedure under par. (a) with
respect to delivery of payment to the judgment obligee.
Note
1. Direct the act to be done at the cost of the disobedient party by some other
person appointed by the court and the act when so done shall have like effect
as if done by the party.
2. If real or personal property is situated within the Phillippines, the court in lieu
of directing a conveyance thereof may be n order to divest the title of any
party and vest it in others, which shall have the force and effect of a
conveyance executed in due form of law.
What is the meaning of “some other persons appointed by the court” under
Sec. 10 (a), Rule 39?
A: The “some other person appointed by the court” can be the Branch Clerk of
Court, the Sheriff, or even the Register of Deeds, and their acts when done under
such authority shall have the effect of having been done by himself.
He can obtain a court order requiring the registered owner to surrender the same and
directing the entry of a new certificate of title in petitioners’ favor.
If the judgment be for the sale of real or personal property, to sell such property,
describing it, and apply the proceeds in conformity with the judgment.
The officer executing a judgment in case of restitution of real property shall comply with
the following:
1. Demand for the person against whom the judgment for the delivery or
restitution of real property I rendered and all person claiming rights under him
to peaceably vacant the property within three (3) working days;
2. Restore possession thereof to the judgment oblige;
3. Otherwise, the officer shall oust and such persons therefrom with the
assistance, if necessary, of appropriate peace officers, and employing such
means as may be reasonably necessary to retake possession, and place the
judgment oblige in possession of such property; and
4. Any costs, damages, rents or profits awarded by the judgment shall be
satisfied in te same manner as a judgment for money.
What are the effects in case the sheriff fails to observe the requirement under
Sec. 10 (c) of Rule 39?
It is hornbook law that “a sheriff who enforces the writ without the required
notice or before the expiration of the three-day period runs afoul with Section 10
(c) of Rule 39”. And will lead to his administrative liability.
Special “ break-open” door is a special order provided in Section 10(d), Rule 39.
When a judgment requires the performance of any act other than those delivery
or conveyance of real, personal properties or conveyance, a certified copy of the
judgment shall be attached to the writ of execution and shall be:
1. Served by the officer upon the prty against whom the same is rendered; or
2. Upon any other person required thereby, or by law, to obey the same; and
3. Such party or person may be punished for contempt if he disobeys such
judgment.
Special judgment is one which requires the performance of any act other than
the payment of money or the sale or delivery of real or personal property which a
party must personally do because his personal qualifications and circumstances
have been taken into consideration.
ORDINARY JUDGMENT - if the judgment orders the defendant to pay money, like a
collection case (Section 9) or to deliver real or personal property (Section 10). If
debtor rfuses to pay his debt, follow Section 9. And if the
The levy on execution shall create a lien favor of the judgment oblige over the
right, title and interest of the judgment obligor in such property at the time of the
levy, subject to liens and encumbrances then existing.
What are the exceptions to the rule on exempted properties from execution?
What is the nature of a family home? What are the duties of the court with
respect to family home?
The family home is a real right which is gratuitous, inalienable and free from
attachment, constituted over the dwelling place and the alnd on which it is
situated, which confers upon a particular family the right to enjoy uch properties,
and cannot be seized by creditor.
The writ of execution shall be returnable to the court issuing it immediately after
the judgment has been satisfied in part or in full.
What is the duty of the officer if the writ was not satisfied in full?
If the judgment cannot be satisfied in full within 30 days after his receipt of the writ, the
officer shall report to the court and state the reason therefor.
What is the nature of the thirty (30) day period for the officer to report in case
on non-satisfaction of the judgment?
the 30-day period imposed for the execution of the writ after the judgment has been
received by the sheriff, as well as the periodic report every 30 days, is mandatory under
the rule.
The reason behind this requirement is to update the court on the status of the execution
and to take the necessary steps to ensure the speedy exection of decisions.
Can the sheriff receive voluntary payments from the parties in implementing
the writ of execution?
No. Sheriffs are not allowed to receive any voluntary payments form the parties in the
course of the performance of their duties, and he cannot just unilaterally demand sums of
money from a party-litigant without observing the proper procedural steps.
Such writ shall continue in effect during the period within which the judgment may be
enforced by motion.
Before the sale of property on execution notice of sale pf perishable property may be
given by:
1. Posting written notice of the time and place of the sale in three public
places, preferably in conspicuous areas of the municipal or city hall, post
office and public market in the municipality or city where the sale is to
take place; and
2. For such time as may be reasonable, considering the character and
condition of the property.
How will the notice of sale be made in case of real property not exceeding
P50,000.00?
In case of real property, by posting for 20 days in three (3) public places
abovementioned a similar notice particularly describing the property and
stating where the property is to be sold?
How will the notice of sale be made in case of real property exceeding
P50,000.00?
In all cases, written notice of the sale shall be given to the judgment obligor,
at least three days before the sale, except as provided in par.(a) hereof where
notice shall be given at any time before the sale, in the same manner as
personal service of pleadings and other papers as provided by Sec.6 of Rule
13.
Sec.16, Rule 39
If the property levied on its claimed by any person other than the judgment
obligor or his agent, such person shall:
The special ancillary remedy proceeding of a third party claim. (Mata vs.
Macaraig, 7145-R, March 5, 1951)
The remedy of terceria is available only to a third person other than the judgment
obligor or the latter’s agent who claims a property levied on.
A “stranger” or a third person is any person other than the judgment debtor or
his agent.
If the property belonging to any third person is mistakenly levied upon to answer
for another man’s indebtedness, suh person has all the right to challenge the levy
through any of the remedies provided for under the Rules of Court.
Will the mere filing of affidavit of third-party claim sufficient to stay execution?
No. The mere filing o a terceria, or an affidavit stating complainant alleged title,
under Sec. 16, Rule 39, or a motion to quash the writ of execution does not stay
the auction sale scheduled by the sheriff.
No. The remedy of terceria is available only to a third person other than the judgment
obligor or his agent who claims a property levid on to be put in auction which is not in
case of Special Order of Demolition which would result in the destruction of party’s
property.
The officer shall not be bound to keep the property, unless such judgment oblige,
on demand of the officer, files a bond approved by the court to indemnify the
third-party claimant in a sum not less than the value of the property levied on. In
case of disagreement as to such value, the same shall be determined by the
court issuing the writ of execution.
No claim for damages for the taking or keeping of the property may be enforced
against the bond unless the action therefor is filed within 120 days from the date
of the filing of the bond.
What is the liability of the officer for the taking or keeping of the property?
The officer shall not be liable for damages for the taking or keeping the property
to any third-party claimant if such bond is filed.
Nothing herein contained shall prevent such claimant or any third person from:
What is the rule if the writ is issued in favor of the Republic of the Philippines?
When the writ of execution is issued in favor of the Republic of the Philippines or
any officer duly representing it, the following rules shall apply:
b) It can be b) It can be
availed of availed of
by filing an by filing an
affidavit initiatory
pleading of
third-party
complaint.
c) The remedy c) It is
of tarceia is available to
available the original
only to a defending
e) No need of e) Being an
payment of initiatory
docket fees. pleading
payment of
docket fees
is required.
An officer selling without the notice prescribed by Sec. 15 of this Rule shall be
liable to pay:
A person willfully removing or defacing the notice posted, if done before the sale,
or before the satisfaction of the judgment if it be satisfied before the sale, shall
be liable to pay:
An officer selling without the notice notice prescribed by Sec. 15 of this Rule shall
be liable to pay:
A person willfully removing or defacing the notice posted, if done before the sale,
or before the satisfaction of the judgment if it be satisfied before the sale, shall
be liable to pay:
What is the effect in case the obligor pays the amount and cost?
At any time before the sale of property on execution, the judgment obligor may
prevent the sale by paying the amount required by the execution and the costs
that have been incurred therein.
All sales of property under execution must be made subject to the following
rules:
When the sale is of real property, consisting of several known lots, they must be:
1) Sold separately; or
2) When a portion of such real property is claimed by a third person, he may
require it to be sold separately.
When the sale is of personal property capable of manual delivery, it must be sold
within view of those attending the same and in such parcels as are likely to bring
the highest price.
What is the duty of the obligor when present during the sale?
Neither the officer conducting the execution sale, nor his deputies, can become a
purchaser, nor be interested directly or indirectly in any purchase at such sale.
What are the effects if the purchaser failed to pay the amount of bid?
If a purchaser refuses to pay the amount bid by him for property struck off to
him at a sale under execution:
1) The officer may again sell the property to the highest bidder;
2) He shall not be responsible for any loss occasioned thereby;
3) The court may order the refusing purchaser to pay into the court the amount
os such loss, with costs; and
4) May punish him for contempt if he disobeys the order.
What is the remedy of the officer against the person who failed to pay the bid?
The officer may thereafter reject any subsequent bid of such purchaser who
refuses to pay.
Should the oblige pay the bid price if he is the purchaser in the execution sale?
When the purchaser is the judgment oblige, and no third-party claim has been filed, he
need not pay the amount of the bid if it does not not exceed the amount of his judgment.
If it does, he shall pay only the excess.
When the purchaser of any personal property, capable of manual delivery, pays the
purchase price, the officer making the sale must:
The sale conveys to the purchaser all the rights which the judgment obligor had in such
property as of the date of the levy on preliminary attachment.
Such certificate must be registered in the Registry of Deeds of the place where the
property is situated.
When a property sold by virtue of a writ of execution has been claimed by a third-person,
the certificate of sale to be issued by the sheriff pursuant to Secs. 23,25 and 25, Rule 39
shall make express mention of the existence of such third-party claim.
Real property sold as provided in the last preceding section, or any part theeof sold
separately, may be redeemed in the manner hereinafter provided, by the following
persons:
1) The judgment obligor or his successor in interest in the whole or any part of
the property ;
2) A creditor having a lien by virtue of an attachment, judgment or mortgage on
the property sold, or on some part thereof, subsequent to the lien under
which the property was sold. Such redeeming creditor is termed as a
redemptioner.
1) The amount of this purchase, with 1% per month interest thereon in addition,
up to the time of redemption;
2) The amount of any assessments or taxes which the purchaser may have paid
thereon after purchase;
3) Interest on such last-named amount at the same rate; and
4) If he be also a creditor having a prior lien to that redemptioner, other than
the judgment under which such purchase was made, the amount of such
other lien, with interest.
Yes, as expressly provided by the above rule that, property so redeemed may
again be redeemed within 60 days after the last redemption upon compliance
with the following, to wit:
1) Paying the sum paid on the last previous redemption, with 2% thereon in
addition;and
2) The amounts of any assessment or taxes which the last previous
redemptioner paid after the redemption thereon, with interest thereon;and
3) The amount of any liens held by the last redemptioner prior to his own,
with interest.
Sec.29, Rule 39
If the judgment obligor redeems, he must make the same payments as are
required to effect a redemption by a redemptioner, whereupon, no further redemption
shall be allowed and he is restored to his etate.
What are the duties of the person to whom payment was made?
The person to whom the redemption payment is made must perform the following,
to wit:
The payments mentioned in this and the last preceding sections may be
made to the purchaser or redemptioner, or for him to the officer who made the
sale.
Note
Read
Padilla vs Philippine Producers Coop Marketing Association, July 15, 2005
Reyes vs Tang December 14, 2011
Sec.30, Rule 39
1) Receive the rents, earnings and income of the property sold on execution,
or the value of the use and occupation thereof when such property is in
the possession of a tenant;
2) All rents, earnings and income derived from the property pending
redemption shall belong to the judgment obligor until the expiration of his
period of redemption.
What is the right of the purchaser if no redemption was made within the time
allowed?
If no redemption be made within one year from the date of the registration of the
certificate of sale, the purchaser is entitled to a conveyance and possession of the
property.
In all cases, the judgment obligor shall have the entire period of one year from the date
of the registration of the sale to redeem the property.
The deed shall be executed by the officer making the sale or by his successor in office,
and in the latter case shall have the same validity as though the officer making the sale
had continued in office and executed it.
What are the rights of the purchaser or redemptioner after the expiration of
period of redemption?
Upon the expiration of the right of redemption, the purchaser or redemptioner shall be:
1) Substituted to and acquire all the rights, title, interest and claim of the
judgment obligor to the property as of the time of the levy;
2) The possession of the property shall be given to the purchaser or last
redemptioner by the same officer unless a third party is actually
holding the property adversely to the judgment obligor.
What is the right of the purchaser after the expiration of period redemption?
Upon the expiration of the period to redeem and no redemption was made, the
purchaser, as confirmed owner, has the absolute right to possess the land and issuance of
the writ of possession becomes a ministerial duty of the court upon proper application and
proof of title.
A writ of possession, which commands the sheriff to place a person in possession or real
property, may be issued in:
Writ of possession may be issued upon ex parte petition with bond before the
expiration of the period of redemption, or without bond after the expiration of the period.
What is the nature of the proceedings for the issuance of writ of possession?
Orders for the issuance of a writ of possession are issued as a matter of course
upon the filing of the proper motion and approval of the corresponding bond since no
discretion is left to the court to deny it.
No. The court can neither halt nor hesitate to issue the writ of possession, since it is
merely ministerial to issue the writ.
No. A certificate against forum shopping is not a requirement in an ex parte petition for
the issuance of a writ of possession since it is not a complaint or other initiatory pleading
as contemplated in Sec. 5, Rule 7 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, but it is rather a
motion.
The exception provided under Sec. 33, Rule 39 of the Rules of Court contemplates a
situation in which a third party holds the property by adverse title or right.
What are the other exceptions to the rule the that issuance of writ of
possession is a ministerial duty?
The exceptions to the rule that issuance of a writ of possession is a ministreal function,
are as follows, to wit.
What is the duty of the court if there is a third person holding adverse title or
interest to the property?
When a parcel or land levied upon on execution is occupied by a party other than a
judgment debtor, the court shall order a hearing to determine the nature of said adverse
possession.
Will the filing of an action for nullity of foreclosure and auction sale enjoins the
issuance of writ of possession?
No. It is settled that a pending action for annulment of mortgage or foreclosure sale does
not stay the issuance of the writ of possession, without prejudice to the outcome of he
annulment case.
No. Should the sheriff levy upon the assets of a third person in which the judgment
debtor has not even the remotest, then he is acting beyond the limits of his authority.
Note
In extrajudicial foreclosure of real estate mortgages under Act No, 3135, the
issuance of a writ of possession is ministerial upon the court after the foreclosure
sale and during the redemption period so long as the party filed an ex parte motion
and the court approved the corresponding bond.
Exception: Section 33, Rule 39
What are the remedies of the purchaser if he fails to recover the property?
1) Recover from the judgment oblige the price paid, with interest, or so
much thereof as has not been delivered to the judgment obligor;
2) He may, on motion, have the original judgment revived in his name for
the whole price with interest, or so much thereof as has been delivered
to the judgment obligors;
3) The judgment so revived shall have the same force and effect as an
original judgment would have as of the date of the revival and no
more.
When property liable to an execution against several persons is sold thereon, and more
than a due proportion of the judgment is satisfied out of the proceeds of the sale of the
property of one of them, or one of them pays, without a sale, more than this proportion,
he may, subject to the following rules:
Note
What are the remedies available to the judgment oblige in aid of execution?
When the return of a writ of execution issued against property of a judgment obligor, or
any one of several obligors in the same judgment, shows that the judgment remains
unsatisfied, in whole or in part, the judgment oblige, at any time after such return is
made, may avail a remedy subject to the following conditions:
When the return of a writ of execution against the property of a judgment obligor shows
that the judgment remains unsatisfied, in whole or in part, and upon proof to the
satisfaction of the court which issued the writ, that a person, corporation, or other
juridical entity has property of such judgment obligor or is indebted to him, the court
may, by an order:
A party or other person may be compelled, by an other or subpoena issued by the court,
to:
1) Attend before the court or commissioner, and to testify as provided in the two
preceding sections;
2) Upon failure to obey such order or subpoena or to be sworn, or to answer as a
witness or to subscribe his deposition, may be punished for contempt as in other
cases.
Sec.39, Rule 39
What duty of the person indebted to the judgment obligor who I served with
the writ by the sheriff?
After a writ of execution against property has been issued, a person indebted to the
judgment obligor may:
1) Pay to the sheriff holding the writ of execution the amount of his debt or so much
thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the judgment, in the manner prescribed in
Secc. 9 of this Rule; and
2) The sheriff’s receipt shall be a sufficient discharge for the amount so paid or
directed to be credited by the judgment obligee on the execution.
Sec.40, Rule 39
What are the action of the court on the property of the judgment obligor?
1) Any property of the judgment obligor, or money due him, not exempt from
execution, in the hands of either himself pr another person, or of a corporation or
other juridical entity , to be applied to the satisfaction of th judgment, subject to
any prior rights over such property;
2) If, upon investigation of his current income and expenses, it appears that tahe
earnings of the judgment ovligor for his personal services are more than necessary
for the support of hi family, the court may order that he pays the judgment in fixed
monthly installments, and upon his failure to pay any such installment when due
without good excuse, may punish him for indirect concept.
Sec.41, Rule 39
What are the orders that the court may issue during execution stage?
If it appears that the judgment obligor has an interest in real estte in the place in
which proceedings are had, as mortgagor or mortgage or otherwise, and his interest
therein cann be ascertained without controversy, the receiver subject to the following
conditions may be:
1) Ordered to sell and convey such real estate or the interest of the obligor therein;
2) Such sale shall be conducted in all respects in the same manner as is provided for
the sale of real estate upon execution;and
3) The proceedings thereon shall be approved by the court before the execution of
the deed.
Sec.43, Rule 39
Q: What are the orders that the court may issue if the person served with
the wit denies the indebtedness?
Sec.45, Rule 39
What is the duty of the obligor or his counsel after satisfaction of judgment?
Sec.46, Rule 39
When a judgment is rendered against a party who stands as surety for another, the
latter is also bound from the time that he has notice of the action or proceeding, and
an opportunity at the surety’s request to join in the defense.
The effect of a judgment or final order rendered by a court of the Philippines, having
jurisdiction to pronounce the judgment or final order may be as follows:
As stated in the above-mentioned provision that “Subject to the right of appeal, such
allowance of the will shall be conclusive as to its due execution.”
What is the effect of a judgment or final order on probate of the will, letters
administration of the fact of death of the testator or decedent?
The probate of a will or granting of letters of administration shall only be prima facie
evidence of the death of the testator or intestate.
Res judicata means that once a matter has been decided withfinality by a court, the
matter is conclusive as between the parties to the case and can no longer be
relitigated.
A The doctrine of res judicata is founded upon two grounds, namely: (1) public policy
and necessity, which dictates that it would be in the interest of the State that there
should be an end to litigation and (2) the hardship on the individual that he should be
vexed twice for the same cause
What are the two (2) aspects of the doctorine of “res judicata”?
The two (2) aspcts of res judicata are, bar by former judgment, and conclusiveness of
judgment ( collateral estoppel or auter action pendant).
1. bar by former judgment, there is identity of causes of action between the prior and
the subsequent case while conclusiveness of judgment the causes of action are
different;
2. in the former, the prior case is conclusive not only as to the matters directly
adjudged but also to any other matter that could have raised in relation thereto, in
the latter the prior case is conclusive only in respect of the matters actually raised
and adjudged in the prior case;
3. in the former, it bars relitigation of a case, in the latter bars only the relitigation of
an issue;
4. in the former, it is a ground for a motion to dismiss, in the latter, it is not.
Conclusiveness of judgment estops the parties from raising in a later case the issues
or points that were raised and controverted, and were determinative of the ruling in
the earlier case.
What is the effect of a judgment or final order on matters which have been
adjudged in a former judgment or final order which appears upon its face
to have been so adjudged or any matter raised in relation thereto?
In any other litigation between the same parties or their successors-in-interest, that
only is deemed to have been adjudged in a former judgment or final order which
appears upon its face to have been so adjudged, or which was actually and necessarily
included therein or necessary thereto.
Bar by prior judgment” arises when, as between the first case where the judgment
was rendered, and the second case that is sought to be barred, there is identity or
parties, subject matter, and causes of action.
The requisites are: that there must be judgment rendered by a court of competent
jurisdiction which is based on the merits, and identity of parties and cause of action
between the two (2) cases.
What is the effect if the defense of barred by prior judgment is not pleaded?
Defense and objection on the ground of barred by prior judgment is not deemed
waived if not pleaded either in a motion to dismiss or in the answer.
What are the ground for the motu propio dismissal of the claim under Sec.
1, Rule 9?
Yes, barred by prior judgment is an exception to omnibus motion rule. (sec.9, Rule 15)
Yes, barred by prior judgment is a ground for a motion to desmiss under Sec. 12 (a3)
of Rule 15.
The dismissal of the action based on, barred by prior judgment iswih prejudice to
refilling of the action.
Read
Igot vs Valenzuela, December 5, 2018
Malion vs Alcantara GR No 141528 October 31, 2006
Ligtas v People August 17, 2015
Central Visayas Finance Corp vs Adlawan March 25, 2019
1) In case of a judgment or final order upon a specific thing, the judgment or final order
is conclusive upon the title to the thing; and
2) In case of a judgment or final order against a person, the judgment or final order is
presumptive evidence of a right as between the parties and their successors-in-
interest by a subsequent title.
An action for the enforcement of a foreign judgment or final order in this jurisdiction is
governed by Sec. 48, Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.
What are the actionable issues in case of a foreign judgment which can be
reviewed under the “Lord Coke’s Doctrine”?
As stated in Sec. 48, Rule 39, the actionable issues are generally restricted to a review of
jurisdiction of the foreign, court, the service of personal notice, collusion, fraud, or
mistake of fact or law.
What is the duty of the petitioner in order that foreign judgment may be
recognized by Philippine Courts?
For Philippine courts to recognize a foreign judgment relating to the status of a marriage
where one of the parties is a citizen of a foreign country, the petitioner only needs to
prove the foreign judgment as a fact under the Rules of Court.
To extend the effect if a foreign judgment in the Philippines, Philippine courts must
determine if the foreign judgment is consistent with domestic public policy and other
mandatory laws.
A: The record of public documents referred to an in paragraph (a) of Sec. 19, when
admissible for any purpose, may be evidenced by:
What is an Appostille?
The Apostille Convention only applies if both the country where the public
document was issued and the county where the public document is to be used are
parties to the Convention.
The Apostille streamlines the whole authentication procedure of documents for use
abroad resulting to more convenience, less cost and processing time for the applicants.
With the Apostille, documents will no longer require legalization by the Foreign
Embassy if the country or territory of destination is already a member of the
Apostille Convention. Once Apostillized by the DFA, the document can be validly
used in any and all Apostille Counties.
In pleading an official document or official act, it is sufficient to aver that the document
was issued or the act was done in compliance with laws.
Note