Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Political Communication
Political Communication
Scholar Commons
Communication College of Arts & Sciences
2014
Political communication
Paul A. Soukup
Santa Clara University, psoukup@scu.edu
Recommended Citation
Soukup, Paul A. (2014). Political communication. Communication Research Trends, 33(2), 3-43.
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Communication by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact rscroggin@scu.edu.
Political Communication
Paul A. Soukup, S.J.
psoukup@scu.edu
1. Introduction
The general area of political communication cuts propaganda studies (1927). Also writing in Kaid’s
across almost all of communication study. The very handbook, Sanders (2004) looks at academic starting
name of the subject area gives a sense of what it points: “the creation in 1973 of the Political
encompasses, but with something so broad, definition Communication Division within the International
poses a challenge. In her introduction to an important Communication Association”; “the teaching of cours-
handbook on the subject Kaid (2004a) acknowledges es, beginning in about 1968, and the development of
many definitions but concludes “Perhaps the best is the graduate programs”; and “the publication of the first
simplest: Chaffee’s (1975) suggestion that political Handbook of Political Communication (Nimmo &
communication is the ‘role of communication in the Sanders, 1981), one of the earliest efforts to provide
political process’ (p. 15)” (Kaid, 2004b, p. xiii). Graber some synthesis and give some structure to this ‘plural-
and Smith (2005) offer an expanded sense of the area: istic’ undertaking” (p. xi). Sanders highlights one key
The field of political communication . . . encom-
aspect of any attempt to study political communication:
passes the construction, sending, receiving, and determining just what its study entails.
processing of messages that potentially have a Political communication forms an enormously
significant direct or indirect impact on politics. complex field. Interdisciplinary from its start in politi-
The message senders or message receivers may cal science and in communication, it has grown more
be politicians, journalists, members of interest so in the decades since Nimmo and Sanders described
groups, or private, unorganized citizens. “The its outlines. Some key theoretical areas, such as media
key element is that the message has a significant effects or agenda setting, could well deserve separate
political effect on the thinking, beliefs, and reviews given the amount of research devoted to them.
behaviors of individuals, groups, institutions, However, seeing the kinds of things studied in political
and whole societies and the environments in communication does allow a person to get a better
which they exist” (Graber, 1993, p. 305). There
sense of its definition and its place within communica-
are many other definitions, of course, but all
encompass the same essential elements. (p. 479).
tion study. Kaid (2004a) organizes her handbook into
six broad areas: theories and approaches (marketing,
These definitions come from two examinations of research, key words); political messages (rhetoric,
political communication. The contributors to the hand- advertising, debates); news coverage of politics (cam-
book edited by Kaid (2004a) look back, reporting on paign coverage, agenda setting, gatekeeping, presiden-
the state of political communication in the early 21st tial coverage); political communication and public
century while Graber and Smith (2005) look forward, opinion (the spiral of silence, information processing,
to where political communication study might go. democratic engagement, gender differences); political
Both views acknowledge history. Graber and communication from an international perspective
Smith call attention to Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Politics, (Europe, Asia); and new trends (pp. xiv–xviii). Graber
dating from the fourth century BCE as a starting point and Smith (2005) begin with a content analysis of four
(2005, p. 479); for Aristotle, the purposes of the art of years of political communication publications and
rhetoric included deliberative and persuasive discourse organize their view of the field into four categories.
to guide decision making in the body politic. “Well-covered topics” include election campaigns,
According to Rogers (2004), in his essay in Kaid new media, civic engagement, international relations,
(2004a), the history of political communication study information processing, public opinion, campaign
begins more recently, after World War I with advertising, framing, agenda setting, and similar things
Lippmann’s Public Opinion (1922) and Lasswell’s (p. 482). “Political communication theories” count the-
3. Theory
With such a long history within communication these areas, continually refining their understanding of
study, political communication has developed a rela- the processes involved.
tionship with other communication or media studies
areas and theoretical approaches. These include per- A. Agenda setting
suasion, political and product advertising, framing, Agenda setting research has formed an important
agenda-setting, media effects, influence, and so on. part of political communication study since McCombs
Many political communication scholars still work with and Shaw (1972) proposed the theoretical model for it,
A. Public opinion influenced each of the thematic areas, making them even
Public opinion broadly describes how and what cit- more important to the political process.
izens and voters think about issues and candidates. How effective are the efforts of media elites to
Political communication study includes it, both as a influence public and political opinion? Habel (2012)
measure of how citizens influence political ideas and as investigates the success of some media elites in trying
a target for parties and politicians who seek to shape pub- to convince voters and politicians to accept their poli-
lic opinion to support their thinking. Mutz and Young cy preferences. Examining the editorial positions of
(2011) provide an overview of public opinion research, two major U.S. newspapers and tracking their influ-
noting the centrality of three themes over the years: “(1) ence through public opinion measures, he found “that
ongoing concerns surrounding the political diversity of the announced positions of the media have minimal
the communication environment; (2) selective exposure influence. Rather, I find evidence of a movable media,
to political communication; and (3) the interrelationship where media opinion shifts in response to changes in
between mass and interpersonal political communica- the policy positions of politicians” (p. 257). Such find-
tion” (p. 1018). They argue that new technologies have ings pose a challenge not only for media outlets but for
Political communication scholars have long rec- complex set of interrelationship with both mass commu-
ognized that some of the most influential communica- nication and interpersonal communication affecting
tion takes place among groups of people, with each other as well as political participation. The inter-
Lazarsfeld, Berelson, and Gaudet (1948) first describ- personal model postulates that voters will minimize
ing what they termed “opinion leaders” whose inter- their costs of obtaining information by, for example,
personal communication shaped the political ideas of conferring with those who have already obtained infor-
their groups. The study of such networks of individu- mation. Ahn, Huckfeldt, Mayer, and Ryan (2013) try to
als continues to hold an important place in political explain what happens when local experts are not avail-
communication. From the time of Lazarsfeld and his able. Having to seek political information from beyond
colleagues, many have wrestled not only with the rela- their own interpersonal networks imposes added costs.
tionship between media and interpersonal influences They note that “the availability of ideal informants
but also with how best to theoretically explain it. varies across groups and settings, with the potential to
Eveland, Morey, and Hutchens (2011) acknowledge produce (1) context-dependent patterns of informant
recent work in “political conversation,” but “argue that centrality, which in turn generate (2) varying levels of
the emphasis of the literature on political conversation polarization among groups and (3) biases in favor of
as a weak form of deliberation or as an afterthought some groups at the expense of others.” To better under-
from the media effects perspective has led to neglect of stand the process, they studied small group communica-
important aspects of the interpersonal communication tion “with aggregate implications addressed using a sim-
process that require careful consideration” (p. 1082). ple agent-based model” (p. 357).
They review the relevant literature and through a cri- The interpersonal-mass communication interac-
tique of the limitations reveals there suggest other tion sometimes appears as a mediation model. Lee
directions for research that addresses how individuals (2012) applies that model to late-night comedy pro-
act as communicators. grams to look at the relationship of such satire, inter-
Tian (2011) tests an “advanced social cognitive personal discussion of the comedy, and political partic-
approach” as a theoretical model of how mass commu- ipation. He tested the model with different research
nication and interpersonal communication influence the designs and concludes that the studies “provide con-
“interrelations among political orientations, communi- siderable support for the model, demonstrating that
cation behaviors, and political participation.” The model various structural features of interpersonal talk (e.g.,
tested is “the theoretical framework of the Orientation discussion frequency, online interaction, and network
1–Stimulus–Orientation 2–Response model.” Tian size) positively mediate the association between late-
found that “both political interest and need for cognition night comedy viewing and political participation” (p.
had direct effects on political media use, whereas politi- 647). In addition the findings show “that late-night
cal interest and need to evaluate had direct effects on comedy can draw a higher level of political involve-
interpersonal political discussion. These results suggest ment from those who are highly educated.”
that need for cognition and need to evaluate—two As in any speech setting, listening matters as
important personality constructs—affect political com- much as speaking. However, Dobson (2012) argues
munication on two different levels” (p. 380). Other vari- that “good listening has been almost completely
ables (political interest, political extremity, need to eval- ignored in that form of political conversation we know
uate) also play a role. The model suggests an extremely as democracy.” In other words, scholars attend to
The Internet and all of its offshoots—collectively paign tools for parties and candidates to reach voters,
“new media,” and specifically, streaming media, and as government resources for offices, ministers, and
YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, blogging, podcasts, web- elected representatives to interact with citizens. The
sites, and so on—have significantly changed the com- second part groups chapters in which researchers
munication landscape for politics and for citizen examine how people use the Internet in politics: for
engagement in just about every country around the direct democracy, for information seeking, for engage-
world. Political communication researchers have cer- ment, for online news (both creation and consump-
tainly paid attention, but these media are so new that tion), and for journalism. In addition one chapter rais-
scholars still attempt to describe their use and their es the question of inequality of access to these new
impact and have only begun to assess them and to offer media. The third section of the handbook (on identity)
theories and predictions about them. offers more theoretical material with chapters on the
In the last five years Routledge has published a virtual public sphere, social networks, gender online,
number of books introducing and analyzing the the immigrant experience, and political identities under
Internet and politics, many as part of their “Critical repressive regimes. Finally, the last part offers several
Concepts in Political Science” series. Their Handbook essays on key legal or policy issues: censorship. sur-
of Internet Politics (Chadwick & Howard, 2009) offers veillance, property and intellectual rights, ownership,
an overview, dividing its 31 chapters among four broad access, and the technical protocols that both enable the
topics: institutions, behaviors, identities, and law and Internet and limit its content. Another Routledge pub-
policy. The first section contains descriptions of the lication, Dutton’s (2014) four-volume set, also pro-
Internet in U.S. and European politics, both as cam- vides a comprehensive introduction to the Internet’s
Much of the early study of political communica- • What are the challenges and the opportunities for
tion took place in the context of U.S. politics and U.S. transnational cooperation and international
media, though with several important theoretical con- research in the field? (p. 256).
tributions coming from Europe. The 21st century has Individual papers introduced in her summary
seen a growing body of work examining political com- begin to develop theoretical models for studying these
munication outside the United States, paying attention questions.
to parliamentary democracy and other forms of politi- In another theoretical piece, Vural (2010) discuss-
cal participation. While many of the variables carry es how political parties themselves should function
over from one country to another, the studies them- within a democratic society and argues that the parties
selves add to a deeper understanding of the role of must be democratic, with internal structures fostering
communication in politics. Increased global connec- the democracy that the parties propose to the larger
tions have also offered greater scope for political com- civic society. Vural criticizes, for example, a “straight
munication research around the world. One big change ticket” voting policy as one that builds too much upon
in political communication study in the last 10 years the person of the party leader and ultimately deprives
appears in the volume of publication. Typically, the members of a voice.
handbooks and overviews of political communication
published up to the early 21st century devoted a chap- A. European Union and Western Europe
ter to international study or to political communication The greatest number of recent works on political
(both practices and studies) in countries outside of the communication outside of the U.S. addresses practices
U.S. Some of this, of course, reflects the country of in or studies about countries in the European Union and
publication of the handbooks and some, the location of Western Europe. Some, like O’Connor (2014) provide
the graduate programs in political communication. historical studies, in this case of the European suffrage
However, the last few years have seen more and publi- movement between 1948 and 1990. The political com-
cation of studies addressing political communication munication about European elections reflected a deep-
outside the U.S. This section will briefly introduce er discussion about democracy and the form of democ-
some of those studies, grouped generally by region. racy that a union might follow. Bruch and Pfister
Some of the more general work looks to commu- (2014) look back at how Europeans saw themselves in
nication or communication study in a transnational set- 1950’s newsreels, which they suggest functioned as a
ting. Wojcieszak (2012) introduces papers from a sym- kind of propaganda for the proposed union. Other stud-
posium that aimed to promote such research looking ies focus on contemporary practices: In a pair of stud-
beyond the Western hemisphere. Noting that “we know ies Auel and Raunio (2014a, 2014b) examine the com-
relatively little about how contextual factors such as munication functions of national parliaments in form-
electoral structures, political culture, media systems, ing or maintaining links with the EU, gathering empir-
and information flows affect citizen participation in the ical data of parliamentary debates on EU issues in the
democratic and especially, in the nondemocratic politi- UK, Finland, Germany and France. Pollak and
cal process,” (p. 255), she calls for more research, par- Slominski (2014) offer a similar study focused on the
ticularly on under-represented areas. She identifies Austrian parliament’s information function in the face
three questions: of EU politics. They look at “the communication strate-
• What can be learned from thinking about media gies of three different sets of actors: the parliament as
and political communication as transnational phe- an institution; parliamentary party groups; and individ-
nomena? ual MPs, and shows how these strategies have changed
• What are the similarities and the differences in aca- over time, notably in the context of the EU Treaty rati-
demic and professional approaches to political fication debates” (p. 109). Lilleker and Koc-Michalska
communication in various contexts? (2013) use the communication of the members of the
A. Computer-assisted methods analysis, but they must also be able to critically assess
Political communication study has refined its the positive aspects as well as the drawbacks of these
research methods over the years. Moving from public new approaches.” The ethical requires researchers “to
opinion polls to sophisticated tracking of voter atten- renegotiate and reflect upon the borders between the
tion in refinements of the agenda-setting hypothesis, to private and the public” (p. 118).
working with large data sets, researchers have attempt- Several research groups propose specific method-
ed to explain voter behavior as well as the effective- ologies for use with digital information. Young and
ness of advertising, campaign debates, emotional Soroka (2012) argue that computer power allows a
appeals, and other factors that might account for citi- greater focus on “the ‘sentiment’ or ‘tone’ of news con-
zen choices. tent, political speeches, or advertisements.” They
One of the most significant recent additions to the describe and validate a method which “uses a diction-
research tools for political communication comes from ary-based approach consisting of a simple word count
computer-assisted methods. Moe and Larsson (2012) of the frequency of keywords in a text from a prede-
recognize the benefits of such large-scale data collec- fined dictionary.” They describe the “Lexicoder
tion and analysis, but also see practical and ethical Sentiment Dictionary” (LSD) and test it “against a
challenges (p. 117). The practical include “the scale of body of human-coded news content” in order to estab-
the data available for collection and analysis challenge lish its validity. Results “suggest that the LSD pro-
our methodological frames as we collect, sort, and duces results that are more systematically related to
study large-scale quantitative data sets—often with the human coding than are results based on the other avail-
use of computer software. Researchers not only need to able dictionaries” (p. 205). Quinn, Monroe, Colaresi,
learn the practices of new tools for data gathering and Crespin, and Radev (2010) look to computer models
The changing communication context affects The second change that affects political commu-
political communication, just as it has an impact on nication has to do with role and understanding of citi-
everything else. Blumler and Coleman (2013) argue zenship. Many experience disillusion and disengage-
that two key historical changes provide the context for ment with politics or feel displaced by corporate power
a re-evaluation of political communication study: the and the rise of inequality (p. 177). For some the very
mode of communication and the object of civic com- idea of democratic paradigm has disappeared, along
munication (p. 174). The former refers to the means with trust in governments dominated by political elites
which linked politicians, citizens, and journalists and (p. 178). For others extreme political partisanship had
to the relative influence each had through those means. led to “negative majoritarianism” and small minded-
They explain: ness. Others conclude “that ‘rational choice’ decision
And since the 1990s, much of the generative
making all too often defies the will of the majority, giv-
ground from which political communication ing them at best the ‘least worst’ rather than the most
emanates does seem to have changed apprecia- desired outcome” (p. 179).
bly. Whereas the “old” system pivoted on a rel- In response to this new world of political com-
atively small number of outlets (particularly, in munication realities, Blumler and Coleman urge a new
limited-channel television) at which the big set of research priorities. These include
political and journalistic battalions could regu- • examining “the implications and consequences of
larly direct their fire, now the channels through communication abundance” (p. 180);
which political communications can flow are far • understanding the effects of the rise of diversity of
more numerous and multifarious. This means opinion (or, conversely) the fall of convergence of
that the targets for communicators to aim at are ideas typical of the mass media (p. 181);
less concentratedly massed and that their audi-
• exploring the changing balance in political report-
ences are more fragmented. Similarly, “both
sides of the traditional communicating equation
ing or understanding between the “game” (cam-
are becoming problematic, fragmented into mul- paigns or issues as competitions between winners
tiple and contending alternative forms and rap- and losers) and the “substance” (policies, values,
idly spawning innovations of structure and func- issues), applied not only to campaigns but to gov-
tion” (to quote Swanson, 1999, once again). And ernance (p. 181);
with the arrival, diffusion, and elaborated • looking at the boundaries or nature of the political,
expansion of the Internet, there has appeared a where culture and even private behaviors become
transformed role for what was once merely “the political; to look “into how traditional political
audience” for political communications. From language is managing to explain these new
constituting chiefly a body of receivers, it has dynamics of social power” (p. 182);
become a communicating force—rather a set of • reconsidering questions of government “regulato-
forces in its own right—with numerous channels
ry policy and audience literacy (p. 182); and
for fast, convenient, interactive, and geographi-
cally extensive expression to which those who
• expanding the research disciplines of political
used to rule the communications roost more or communication to include not only communica-
less unchallenged must now closely attend. (pp. tion or media studies and political science, but
175–176). also “political theory, psychology, history, and
cultural studies” (p. 182).
This look through the last several years of media. The new relationships of social media, for
research in political communication gives an idea of example, work differently and few, if any, know how to
the vibrancy of this kind of communication research; it explain or predict that.
also highlights a number of developments in the field. Political communication study and practice opens
Perhaps the most obvious lies in the sheer number of now onto a challenging future.
publications in political communication: These address
both the practices of political communication—that is, References
what politicians and voters and media resources actual-
Ahn, T. K., Huckfeldt, R., Mayer, A. K., & Ryan, J. B. (2013).
ly do—and the study of political communication—that
Expertise and bias in political communication net-
is, how scholars and researchers try to understand and works. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2),
theorize about the former. A second development, also 357-373. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00625.x
obvious from the first, is the growing internationaliza- Albæk, E., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Forskning i politisk
tion of both aspects of political communication. Not kommunikation: Et overblik. (Danish). Research in
only do scholars pay attention to what occurs outside Political Communication: An Overview, 42(3), 279-293.
the U.S., but they also resist the “westernization” of the Aragón, P., Kappler, K. E., Kaltenbrunner, A., Laniado, D.,
analysis and understanding of political activity. & Volkovich, Y. (2013). Communication dynamics in
Third, and less obviously, the study of political Twitter during political campaigns: The case of the
communication depends more and more on computer- 2011 Spanish national election. Policy & Internet,
assisted research. Researchers have access to digital 5(2), 183-206. doi:10.1002/1944-2866.POI327
archives of political materials, ranging from texts of Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Murphy, C. (2012).
Polarized political communication, oppositional media
speeches to collections of video materials. And
hostility, and selective exposure. Journal of Politics,
researchers more and more need computing power to 74(1), 174-186. doi:10.1017/S002238161100123X
analyze large data sets of information, whether of those Åström, J., & Karlsson, M. (2013). Blogging in the shadow
same archives or of voter polls of or experimental of parties: Exploring ideological differences in online
results. More sophisticated statistics reveal more subtle campaigning. Political Communication, 30(3), 434-
connections but also require more computing. 455. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737430
Fourth, though recognized in reviews of political Atkins, J., & Finlayson, A. (2013). “... A 40-year-old Black
communication 10 or more years ago, the impact of man made the point to me”: Everyday knowledge and
new communication technologies has still surprised the performance of leadership in contemporary British
most researchers. The rapidly developing ICTs, their politics. Political Studies, 61(1), 161-177.
ubiquity, their availability, and their relatively low- doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00953.x
costs have transformed the political realm. The ICTs Auel, K., & Raunio, T. (2014a). Debating the state of the
union? Comparing parliamentary debates on EU issues
have spread out political voice but also launched a new
in Finland, France, Germany and the United Kingdom.
battle among political elites, challengers, and those dis- Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(1), 13-28.
possessed in the political process. doi:10.1080/13572334.2013.871482
Finally, and largely a result of the ICTS, political Auel, K., & Raunio, T. (2014b). Introduction: Connecting
communication scholars have recognized the need for with the electorate? Parliamentary communication in
new theory. Much of how people understand political EU affairs. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(1), 1-12.
communication grew out of studies of persuasion, of doi:10.1080/13572334.2013.871481
interpersonal relationships, and of the effects of the Avşar, B. Z., & Duman, B. (2011). Erzurum Kongresi Açiş
mass media. In that relatively closed world, researchers Konuşmasi Işiginda Milli Mücadele Süreci Ve
could try to work out—and their models reflected an Atatürk’ün Siyasal İletişim anlayişi. (Turkish). The
extraordinary complexity—how journalists or media process of national struggle and Ataturk’s concept of
industries or politicians influences voters, for example. political communication in the light of opening speech
of the Erzurum Kongress. Journal of Communication
But most of these theories presumed effects of “big”