Professional Documents
Culture Documents
General Studies Comment Sheet: Date
General Studies Comment Sheet: Date
1812
Test Code
Q. No. Marks
Overall Macro comments / Feedback / Suggestions on Answer Booklet :
1 3 Dear student,
2 Contextual competence is adequate like you have the understanding, you have understood the context
4 in which the Questionasked.You have understood the demand/context of most of the Que .However In
4 Ques 1, 11, 13, 17 your answer was not inAlignment to the demand of the question, try to write what
3 has been asked in the question and not what you know.
4 4 Language competence is fine you have written in easy to read and understandable language.
5 3 Content competence is ok You have the understanding about the subject matter which is good.
However in the question 16, 18 and 20 you have to put more emphasis on what has been asked in the
4 question and not what you know. Also you have to identify the implicit part of the question and answer
6 accordingly.
7 4 Structure and presentation is again satisfactory though i would suggest you to write briefly in points.
see micro comments to identify the errors.
8 3.5
Introduction you have written well in almost all the question however you have to keep it short. You
missed the intro part in question no 3, 6 and 12 which you must keep in mind while attempting next
9 3.5 test. Do not skip intro part as it is the prelude to your whole answer. (see micro-comments for further
explanation).
10 4.5
Conclusion should be balanced, optimistic and suggestion based which you have nicely done, but
11 1 there are room for improvement. See micro-comments for further explanation.
12 4 Rest you have the competence to excel, read more and work on your shortfalls, to score even better.
13 1
14 4.5
15 4.5
16 2
17 2
18 2
19 4
20 2.5
4
4
4
3
4
4
3.5
3.5
4.5
1
4
1
4.5
4.5
2
2
2
4
2.5
64.5
introduction is okay
please try
to
incorporate
points as
per the
demand of
the
question.
conclusion is okay
3
introduction is okay, but try to
keep it short as there is paucity
of words and time.
points that you have shared
are okay
4
in the introduction part write few lines on
both the systems providing examples of
both the countries
good points
4
introduction that you
have provided is okay,
but try to keep it a bit
short.
good points that you
have shared.
the question also demanded it
to write its difference from a
political party, you have to
write that part as well, rest is
okay
conclusion is okay
3
in the introduction part write two lines
on UPSC, dream of many youths etc,
then write its contribution to India so
far
4
introduction is okay
conclusion is okay
4
introduction is okay
points that you have
shared are okay
good points
3.5 good points that you have
shared. The conclusion part is
missing, you were to provide
the importance of the genesis
of both the features and end it
up with a positive note.
introduction is okay
3.5
introduction is okay
points that you have
shared are okay
good points
good conclusion that you
have provided
4.5
introduction is okay, but try
to keep it a bit short
conclusion is okay
4
introduction is okay
1
introduction is okay
conclusion is okay
4.5
you can improve your introduction by
writing about the disqualification,
anti-defection etc
conclusion is good
4.5
introduction is good
nice point
good point
2
introduction is okay but
you can improve the
intro. by citing article 50
of the Indian constitution
good point
points that you have
shared are okay
conclusion is okay
4
introduction is a bit
long try to keep it
short and concise
point that you have shared is
okay, but it is a bit long.
Instead of putting emphasis
on this part you should have
written more points on how
PM has pre-eminence.
you have to more points like: how the Position of PM is
pre-eminent as compared to the council of ministers,
She/he recommends people to be appointed as ministers
to the president, She/He supervises activities of all
ministers, she/he heads the national development council,
national integration council, interstate council, Niti Aayog
etc
conclusion is okay
2.5