Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHapter Eight - Authority and Power in Politics
CHapter Eight - Authority and Power in Politics
4. Competence Theory
According to this, authority has its source in the technical competence of the superior. The
manager, according to this theory, has no authority but his words are heard and orders are
obeyed only because of his intelligence, knowledge, skill competence and experience. If he has
no skill or knowledge, he can exercise no authority on others.
When a doctor advises rest to a patient, he accepts his advice because of doctor’s knowledge and
not because of his formal authority or legal right. The patient will get relief only if he obeys the
doctor. Similarly, we accept the diagnosis of a car mechanic without questioning it because of
his competence for this work. So the knowledge or competence of a person gives him a status
where his authority is accepted by others.
5. Charismatic Authority Theory
The charismatic authority rests on the personal charisma of a leader who commands respect of
his followers. The personal traits such as good looks, intelligence, integrity, etc., influence others
and people follow the dictates of their leaders because of such traits. The people follow the
leader because they feel that he will help them in achieving their goals. The charismatic
leaders are generally good orators and have hypnotic effect on the followers. Aand actresses
have been successful in raising huge funds for calamities etc. because of their charismatic
personalities. Even political parties associate actors and actresses with them to collect crowds
for their rallies. People follow some leaders/persons because of their charismatic personalities
and not because of any other factor.
6. The Acceptance Theory
This theory was popularized by Chester Barnard. Management theorist Chester Barnard
believed organizations need to be both effective and efficient. Effective means meeting
organizational goals in a timely way. Efficient, in his opinion, means the degree to which the
organization can satisfy the motives of its employees. In other words, the organizational goals
will be accomplished and authority will be accepted when workers feel satisfied that their
individual needs are being met. This is known as the acceptance theory of authority. It is also
known as bottom-up authority. It is based on the premise that authority does not flow from top to
bottom but flows from bottom to top. It implies that superiors can exercise authority only if it is
accepted by the subordinates. Acceptance view of authority finds the basis of authority is the
influenced rather than the influencer. The acceptance of authority by subordinates, thus, vests
management with authority. The flow of authority takes the form of request by top managers. If
this request is accepted by subordinates, managers exercise the authority, and if subordinates do
not accept it, no authority is exercised by managers. This view says authority of management is
only to the extent of which subordinates are willing to accept.
Acceptance theory of authority states that a manager's authority rests on workers' acceptance of
his right to give orders and to expect compliance. Workers have to believe that the manager can
legitimately give orders and there is legitimate expectation that the orders will be carried out.
Bernard observes that a subordinate will accept an order if:
He understands it well
He believes it to be consistent with the organisational goals
He feels it to be compatible with his personal interest.
He is fit (mentally and physically) to comply with it.
The subordinates may accept order if they gain out of its acceptance or lose out of its non-
acceptance. It can be said that acceptance of on order is the function of advantages from it. The
acceptance theory, though supporting the behavioural approach to management, brings many
problems in organisation. It undermines the authority and the role of a manager in the
organisation. He may not be sure whether his orders will be accepted or not. He will know if
only when his orders are actually implemented. It means that orders flow from bottom to
upward. If the subordinates do not accept the orders of a superior there will be no use of
exercising authority
Types of Authority
1. Line Authority: defines the relationship between superior and subordinate. It is direct
supervisory relationship. Line authority is represented by the standard chain of command
or it flows downward in an organization directly from superior to subordinates.
2. Staff Authority:-is advisory in nature. Managers whose role is to provide advice or
technical assistance are granted advisory authority. Staff authority is not providing any
basis for direct control over the subordinates or activities of other departments with whom
they consult. (Within the staff managers own department he or she exercises line authority
over the department’s subordinates.”
3. Functional Authority:-The right to control activities of other departments as they relate to
specific staff responsibilities is known as functional authority. It is authority delegated to
an individual or department over specific activities undertaken by personnel in other
departments. Staff departments may be given functional authority to control their systems
procedures in other departments. For example, Audit department has legitimate authority
to control and regulate the activities of other departments such as finance, inventory etc,
(Here it can be considered as both expert and legitimate power), and Personnel
department has legitimate power to control recruitment, selection performance appraisal
system with in other departments.
Staff - Line relationships
General Manager
President
Power Vs Authority
Many scholars argue that terms power and authority are synonymous, but the words are only
related to each other. Power comes from the Latin word potere, which means "to be able." But
things with power are much more than able — they're able to exert a lot of force. "The powers
that be" are those who hold authority, and "the power behind the throne" refers to the people
who exert influence without being formally in charge. Power is the ability to exert influence on
other people; power can be present in any relationship. Still, managers are not the only people
who can exert influence at organizations. Employees say and do things to influence managers.
Authority on the other side only holds functional with relationship within organizations.
promotion, extra time off from work, etc. For example, the supervisor who provides
employees comp time when they meet an objective she sets for a project.
Coercive power: - based on the influencer ability to punish another individual for not
meeting requirements. It is virtually the opposite of reward power. Coercive power is
conveyed through fear of losing one’s job, being demoted, receiving a poor performance
review, having prime projects taken away, etc. This power is obtained through
threatening others. This type of power can be used to set high expectations for employee
performance. Leaders can use coercive power to establish innovation as part of their
employee’s responsibilities if people aren’t able to come up with new and inventive ways
of doing things, then they might get replaced with someone who can provide that value.
Legitimate power: - (formal authority) exists when employee or influence acknowledges
that the influencer is entitled to exert influence within certain bounds. The right of a
manager to establish reasonable work schedules is an example of "downward" legitimate
power. A plant guard may have the 'upward' authority to require even the company
president to present an identification card before being allowed onto the premises.
Simply, legitimate power is the power which is derived from a person’s official position
in an organization.
Expert Power: - is based on the perception or belief that the influencer has some relevant
expertise or special knowledge that the person being influenced doesn't. As we gain
experience in particular areas, and become thought leaders in those areas, we begin to
gather expert power that can be utilized to get others to help us meet our goals. For
example, the Project Manager who is an expert at solving particularly challenging
problems to ensure a project stays on track. When we do what our doctors tell us we are
acknowledging their expert power.
Referent Power:- is based on the identification of an individual with who is held in high
esteem, admired, and often imitated by the subordinates. Referent power comes from
being trusted and respected. We can gain referent power when others trust what we do
and respect us for how we handle situations. Charismatic managers usually have this
power.
To use moral power in your career, establish a personal mission statement and philosophy to
live by. When you make this statement known to others and consistently live by your principles,
they come to trust your example.
4. Connection power
Leaders have connection power when their alliance with influential people is admired and
desired by others. The connection gives people the sense that the leader possesses or has access
to the same power that the influential person has. This is beneficial in cases where the leader has
connections to possible business investors.
Building relationships establish a framework for connection power. Take advantage of
networking opportunities to make lasting friendships throughout your career.
5. Founder power
Founder power exists when a leader is the founder of an organization, ideal or movement.
Others defer to this person's power because there is a perception of having a deeper knowledge
than the others through experience. Becoming an entrepreneur of a successful business gives you
founder power even after you have stepped down from running day-to-day activities.
that manifests externally. In this sense, a person’s personal power grows as they develop.
True power is a combination of both internal and external power. This means that anyone
can access a certain amount of power, regardless of their position in the hierarchy.