DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT OF

DYE SHED OF SQUARE APPARELS LTD.

Project type: Single Storied Steel Shed with Mezzanine

Location: Zamirdia, Habirbari, Bhaluka, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.

Client: SQUARE APPARELS LTD.

Assessed by-
Engr. Md. Mehedi Hasan
Lead Structural Engineer,
Sthapona Consultants
M.Sc. (Structural Engineering, BUET) B.Sc. (BUET),
MIEB -24748, Rajuk Reg. DMINB-CE0233.

Submitted by

Y OUR S AFETY IS OUR C ONCERN

st
1 Floor, House#18, Road#20, Nikunjo-2, Dhaka-1229.
Office: +880-1762-777666.
sthaponaconsultants@gmail.com
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................... 1
1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 GENERAL OBJECTIVE ..................................................................................................... 3
2 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS ........................................................................................................... 4
2.1 EVALUATION OF CONCRETE STRENGTH FROM CORE TEST ............................. 4
3 ANALYSIS FOR STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY .................................................................... 5
3.1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 5
3.2 CODES AND PRACTICES ................................................................................................ 6
3.3 MATERIAL PROPERTY .................................................................................................... 6
3.4 LOADS ...................................................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Dead Load ......................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Live Load........................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.4.3 Wind Load (W) ................................................................................................................................................ 7
3.4.4 Earthquake Load ............................................................................................................................................. 9

3.5 METHOD OF ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 9

3.6 LOADING AND LOAD COMBINATION ................................................................ 10
3.7 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 12
3.8 APPLICATION OF LOAD AND ANALYSIS .......................................................... 13
4 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR BNBC GUIDELINES
(RECOMMENDED LOADINGS & LOAD COMBINATIONS) ......................................... 14
4.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION ....................................................... 14
4.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN .......................................................................... 24
4.2.1 Checking Adequacy of RCC Column ................................................................................................... 24
4.2.1.1 Checking Adequacy of Steel Column ..............................................................................28

4.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF BEAMS ...................................................................... 29

4.3.1.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam ...............................................................................................29
4.3.1.2 Evaluation of Steel Beams ...............................................................................................30
4.3.1.1 Evaluation of Steel Rafters and Bracings ........................................................................32

5 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 36
6 RECOMMENDATION .................................................................................................................. 36
7 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AFTER RETROFITTING ............. 37

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

7.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION ....................................................... 37

7.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF RCC COLUMN ................................................................. 47
7.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF BEAMS ...................................................................... 51
7.3.1.1 Evaluation of Grade Beams .............................................................................................51
7.3.1.1 Evaluation of Steel Beams: ..............................................................................................52

8 DISCLAIMER ................................................................................................................................... 57

List of Figures
Figure 1.1.1: Location of Project ........................................................................................ 2

Figure 3.1.1: Steel Beam-Column Frame System of the Building ..................................... 5

Figure 3.1.2: 3D View of Analytical Model ....................................................................... 5

Figure 3.4.1: Wind Load for steel Building ........................................................................ 8

Figure 3.8.1: Deflected Shape of the building .................................................................. 13

Figure 4.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan ............................................................................... 14

Figure 4.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model ..................................................................... 15

Figure 4.2.1: Column Layout Plan .................................................................................... 24

Figure 4.2.2: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-A ...................................................... 25

Figure 4.2.3: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-B ...................................................... 25

Figure 4.2.4: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-C ...................................................... 25

Figure 4.2.5: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-D ...................................................... 25

Figure 4.2.6: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-E....................................................... 26

Figure 4.2.7: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-F ....................................................... 26

Figure 4.2.8: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-G ...................................................... 26

Figure 4.2.9: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-H ...................................................... 26

Figure 4.2.10: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-I ...................................................... 27

Figure 4.2.11: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-J ..................................................... 27

Figure 4.2.12: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-K .................................................... 27

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 4.2.13: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-L .................................................... 27

Figure 4.2.14: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-M ................................................... 28

Figure 4.2.15: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-N .................................................... 28

Figure 4.2.16: Conditions of Steel column ....................................................................... 28

Figure 4.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams. ......................................................................... 29

Figure 4.3.2: Conditions of steel beam of Ridge 1 ........................................................... 30

Figure 4.3.3: Conditions of steel beams at mezzanine level. ............................................ 30

Figure 4.3.4: Conditions of steel beam Ridge 2 ................................................................ 31

Figure 4.3.5: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 3 .............................................................. 32

Figure 4.3.6: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 5 .............................................................. 32

Figure 4.3.7: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 7 .............................................................. 32

Figure 4.3.8: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 9 .............................................................. 32

Figure 4.3.9: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 11 ........................................................... 33

Figure 4.3.10: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 13 ......................................................... 33

Figure 4.3.11: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 15 ......................................................... 33

Figure 4.3.12: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 17 ......................................................... 33

Figure 4.3.13: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 21 ......................................................... 34

Figure 4.3.14: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 24 ......................................................... 34

Figure 4.3.15: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 24 ......................................................... 34

Figure 4.3.16: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 30 ......................................................... 34

Figure 4.3.17: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 32 ......................................................... 35

Figure 4.3.18: Conditions of steel Roof Bracing .............................................................. 35

Figure 7.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan ............................................................................... 37

Figure 7.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model ..................................................................... 38

Figure 7.2.1: RCC Column Layout Plan ........................................................................... 47

Figure 7.2.2: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-A ..................................................... 47

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.2.3: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-B ...................................................... 48

Figure 7.2.4: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-C ...................................................... 48

Figure 7.2.5: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-D ..................................................... 48

Figure 7.2.6: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-E ...................................................... 48

Figure 7.2.7: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-F ...................................................... 49

Figure 7.2.8: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-G ..................................................... 49

Figure 7.2.9: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-H ..................................................... 49

Figure 7.2.10: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-I ..................................................... 49

Figure 7.2.11: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-J ..................................................... 50

Figure 7.2.12: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-K ................................................... 50

Figure 7.2.13: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-L .................................................... 50

Figure 7.2.14: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-M ................................................... 50

Figure 7.3.1: Conditions of Grade Beam ......................................................................... 51

Figure 7.3.2: Conditions of steel beam of Ridge 1 ........................................................... 52

Figure 7.3.3: Conditions of steel beam Ridge 2 ................................................................ 53

Figure 7.3.4: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 3 .............................................................. 54

Figure 7.3.5: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 5 .............................................................. 54

Figure 7.3.6: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 7 .............................................................. 54

Figure 7.3.7: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 9 .............................................................. 54

Figure 7.3.8: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 11 ............................................................ 55

Figure 7.3.9: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 13 ............................................................ 55

Figure 7.3.10: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 15.......................................................... 55

Figure 7.3.11: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 17.......................................................... 55

Figure 7.3.12: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 21.......................................................... 55

Figure 7.3.13: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 24.......................................................... 56

Figure 7.3.14: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 27.......................................................... 56

Figure 7.3.15: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 30.......................................................... 56

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.3.16: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 32.......................................................... 56

Figure 7.3.17: Conditions of horizontal steel rafter .......................................................... 57

Figure 7.3.18: Conditions of horizontal steel rafter .......................................................... 57

Figure 7.3.19: Conditions of horizontal steel rafter .......................................................... 57

List of Tables
Table 1.1.1: Basic information ............................................................................................ 2

Table 4.1.1: Foundation Size Check for Spread Footing .................................................. 16

Table 4.1.2: Punching Shear Check for Spread Footing ................................................... 20

Table 7.1.1: Foundation Check For Bearing Capacity...................................................... 39

Table 7.1.2: Punching Shear Check for Spread Footing ................................................... 43

ANNEX-I: NDT & DT REPORT

ANNEX-II: SOIL TEST REPORT

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The existing Factory building of SQUARE APPARELS LTD. is currently in operation as a single
storied shed with mezzanine floor composed of Steel Frame.

For improving structural condition SQUARE APPARELS LTD. has engaged Sthapona
Consultants for performing Detailed Engineering Assessment along with checking architectural
and structural drawing of the building.

The structural and architectural drawings were verified by Ferro-scanning, dimensions

measurement, foundation explorations etc. There are few changes in as-built condition with
architectural drawings which has been incorporated during Detailed Engineering Assessment.

For Detailed Engineering Assessment one of the key inputs is the concrete strength. Six cores
from different locations of columns have been collected to test the concrete strength. These
cores have been sent and tested in BUET lab by UTM (universal testing machine) to find its
compressive strength. It has been found that stone chips were used as coarse aggregate.
Equivalent concrete strength (As per ACI-562) for column is 4168 psi. The yield strength of
structural rebar is 72.5 Ksi which is confirmed by BUET test. Strength of BUET test result is
presented in Annex-I. The strength of structural steel is considered to be 50 ksi as these
materials were brought in the same challan as washing shed and the strength of structural steel
was confirmed to be 50 ksi from BUET test report.

Considering BNBC referred loading combinations, we analysed the structure & found that all the
spread footings are adequate in bearing capacity as well as in punching shear capacity. Most of
the RCC columns are inadequate. But all of the grade beams are adequate. Some steel beam,
rafters and roof bracings are inadequate.

There are some non-structural members (lintels) which is not incorporated in this report.

We recommend to rectify the overstressed members (RCC columns, Steel Beams and Rafters)
shown in this remedial drawing to meet loadings and load combinations as per BNBC. Until
rectification the factory can continue its operation under allowable load plan.

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 1

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND
The Dye Shed of SQUARE APPARELS LTD. is currently in operation as a single storied shed located
at Zamirdia, Habirbari, Bhaluka, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Having Latitude: 24.293900°N and
Longitude: 90.383890°E.

*Source: Google Earth

Figure 1.1.1: Location of Project

Table 1.1.1: Basic information

Information Description

Structural System The structural system of this building is moment resisting frame
system.
Floor Area 94627.16 sft.

Number of Stories Single storied Shed with mezzanine floor.

Foundation Type Spared Footing.

Construction materials Concrete with stone chips and structural steel.

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 2

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

1.2 GENERAL OBJECTIVE

Sthapona Consultants was assigned to conduct detailed engineering assessment of the factory
building of SQUARE APPARELS LTD. The scope of work of the project has been shown below,
which includes recommendation made by the Alliance team,

(i). Ferro-Scanning in Column, Beam and Slab for Rebar Detection

(ii). Validate available structural design drawings
(iii). Verify architectural drawings and
(iv). The Structural Integrity Assessment of the building, which includes the following
items:
• Highlight any variations between as-built and structure design drawings (if
applicable).
• Result of testing of materials.
• Details of assumptions, loading, inputs and results of computer modelling.
• Detail assessment of the performance of all structural members under the seismic
load, earthquake load and gravity load.
• Commentary on adequacy/inadequacy of elements of the structure and further plan
of action.

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 3

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

2 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS

2.1 EVALUATION OF CONCRETE STRENGTH FROM CORE TEST

For Detailed Engineering Assessment one of the key inputs is the concrete strength. Six cores
from different locations of columns have been collected to test the concrete strength. These
cores have been sent and tested in BUET lab by UTM (universal testing machine) to find its
compressive strength. It has been found that stone chips were used as coarse aggregate.
Equivalent concrete strength (As per ACI-562) for column is 4168 psi. The yield strength of
structural rebar is 72.5 Ksi which is confirmed by BUET test. Strength of BUET test result is
presented in Annex-I. The strength of structural steel is considered to be 50 ksi as these
materials were brought in the same challan as washing shed and the strength of structural steel
was confirmed to be 50 ksi from BUET test report.

Calculation of Equivalent Concrete Strength as per ACI 562 for Column

n kc
Core Test Core Modified
Core Diameter
Result Diameter Strength 2 2.4
ID Effect
(psi) (inch) (psi)
1 6300 2.680 1.0396 6549.5 3 1.47
2 4190 2.680 1.0396 4355.9 4 1.28
3 5340 2.680 1.0396 5551.5 5 1.2
4 5190 2.680 1.0396 5395.5 f c (avg)= 5204.9 psi 6 1.15
Standard Deviation of
5 4070 2.680 1.0396 4231.2 852.84 psi 8 1.1
Core strength=
6 4950 2.680 1.0396 5146.0 Coefficient of variation, V= 0.16 10 1.08

Number Of Sample, n= 12 1.06

6
Coefficient of variation
1.15 16 1.05
modification factor, kc =
f c (eq)= 4168.0 psi 20 1.03
>25 1.02

So, Concrete Strength for Column is 4168 psi.

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 4

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

3 ANALYSIS FOR STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY

3.1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

The structural system of the factory building is a single-story moment resisting frame system.
RCC columns, steel beams & rafters are the main structural member. General 3D view of the
building has been presented in Figure 3.1.2.

Figure 3.1.1: Steel Beam-Column Frame System of the Building

Figure 3.1.2: 3D View of Analytical Model

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 5

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

3.2 CODES AND PRACTICES

For the present project, relevant sections of Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC, 2006)
have been used for analyses. For the reinforced concrete design, American Concrete Institute
(ACI 318-08) & for steel design, AISC360-05 (American Institute of Steel Construction, LRFD)
code has been consulted as and when became necessary to complement the BNBC.

3.3 MATERIAL PROPERTY

The principal material of construction is reinforced concrete & structural steel. As per
investigation and design drawings, the following material properties has been used:

❖ Yield strength of structural steel, fy = 50,000 lb/in2

❖ Yield strength of structural rebar, fy = 72,500 lb/in2
❖ Compressive strength of concrete for column, fc' = 4168 lb/in2
❖ Young's modulus of concrete, Ec = 57,000fc'

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 6

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

3.4 LOADS

Prior to structural analysis it is essential that the loads that may act upon the building during its
lifetime be duly considered and incorporated in the analysis. The loads that may act upon the
structure are as follows:

3.4.1 Dead Load

Dead loads (D) are those gravity load which remain acting on the structure permanently without
any change during the structures normal service life. These are basically the loads coming from
the weight of the different components of the structure. For the sake of convenience in the
analysis, sometimes this kind of loads are divided into two types, namely a) self-weight of the
structure (SW) and b) the weight coming from the non-structural permanent components of the
building (SDEAD).

❖ Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 150 pcf

❖ Unit weight of brickwork = 120 pcf
❖ Unit weight of steel = 490 pcf

3.4.2 Live Load

Live load is the gravity load due to non-permanent objects like machines, furniture, and human.
Analysis has been carried out base on load recommended by BNBC (2006). For checking if
needed reduced live load are also used to find the allowable live load for the structure.

3.4.3 Wind Load (W)

Bangladesh is typically a storm prone area where due consideration to the thrust due to storm
must be given in the analysis and design of building and structures. Wind load due to storm is
typically modelled as lateral thrust force causing sway or overturning of the building. Detailed
specifications on wind loading on buildings are outlined in BNBC (2006). The present project is
located in Mymensing, for which the following basic parameters are used in wind load calculation,

❖ Basic wind speed, Vb= 217 km/h

❖ Exposure category = A
❖ Structure Importance coefficient CI =1.00

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 7

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

The following figure illustrates the procedure of calculating wind load for this structure-

Perpendicular to Ridge
Windward Wall Side Wall Leeward Wall
qh= 1.295109 qh= 1.295109 qh= 1.295109
Ph= 0.935911 KN/sq.m Ph= -1.31028 KN/sq.m Ph= -0.37436 KN/sq.m
Vb= 217 Vb= 217 Vb= 217
Cg= 1.4453 Cg= 1.4453 Cg= 1.4453
Cz= 0.5827 Cz= 0.5827 Cz= 0.5827
Cpe= 0.5 Cpe= -0.7 Cpe= -0.2
Spacing= 4.456 m Spacing= 3.127 m Spacing= 4.456 m
UDL= 4.17 KN/m UDL= -4.10 KN/m UDL= -1.67 KN/m
Windward Roof Leeward Roof
qh= 1.295109 qh= 1.295109
Ph= 1.685 KN/sq.m Ph= -0.936 KN/sq.m
Vb= 217 Vb= 217
Cg= 1.4453 Cg= 1.4453
Cz= 0.5827 Cz= 0.5827
Cpe= 0.9 Cpe= -0.5
Spacing= 4.456 m Spacing= 4.456 m
UDL= 7.51 KN/m UDL= -4.17 KN/m

Parallel to Ridge
Windward Wall Leeward Wall
qh= 1.295109 qh= 1.295109
Ph= 1.497457 KN/sq.m Ph= -0.71129 KN/sq.m
Vb= 217 Vb= 217
Cg= 1.4453 Cg= 1.4453
Cz= 0.5827 Cz= 0.5827
Cpe= 0.8 Cpe= -0.38
Spacing= 3.127 m Spacing= 3.127 m
UDL= 4.68 KN/m UDL= -2.22 KN/m
Side Wall Roof (Windward+Leeward)
qh= 1.295109 qh= 1.295109
Ph= -1.31028 KN/sq.m Ph= -1.310 KN/sq.m
Vb= 217 Vb= 217
Cg= 1.4453 Cg= 1.4453
Cz= 0.5827 Cz= 0.5827
Cpe= -0.7 Cpe= -0.7
Spacing= 2.389 m Spacing= 4.456 m
UDL= -3.13 KN/m UDL= -5.84 KN/m

Figure 3.4.1: Wind Load for steel Building

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 8

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

3.4.4 Earthquake Load

Proper structural design of any building structure must include loads due to earthquake shaking.
Although there has been no major incident of earthquake hazard in the recent past of Bangladesh,
earthquakes are not uncommon in this area. Scientific geological study of the earth crust below
Bangladesh shows that Bangladesh does fall in moderate to high seismic risk zone. Statistical
evidence from past major and minor earthquake incidents shows that a major earthquake is
overdue in the recent times of geological scale. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare against any
possible earthquake hazard. It should be kept in mind that the objective of earthquake resistance
building design is not to make a strong building which can resist any damage due to earthquake.
Instead, earthquake resistant design basically aims at minimizing the possible damage and
casualty to an acceptable level.

Regarding the earthquake resistant structural design, it essential that the specific design code is
followed. For the analysis and design checking of this building, Equivalent Static Force Method
of BNBC (2006) is followed. The main considerations for calculation of earthquake load are given
below.

❖ Zone co-efficient, Z = 0.25 (zone 3, As Per BNBC 2006)

❖ Structure importance co-efficient, I = 1.00 (Standard Occupancy, Table 6.2.23, BNBC
2006)
❖ Response modification co-efficient for RCC, R =8.0 (IMRF, Table 6.2.24, BNBC)
❖ Response modification co-efficient for steel, R =6.0 (OMRF, Table 6.2.24, BNBC)
❖ Site co-efficient, S = 1.2 (type 2 soil as suggested in Table 6.2.25, BNBC)

3.5 METHOD OF ANALYSIS

Depending on the type of project, there are several well-established methods among which Finite
Element Method (FEM) is perhaps the most sophisticated and all-encompassing one. For analysis
and design checking of the building, powerful finite element based structural design software
package ETABS 2016 V 16.2.1 has been employed for analysis. Some aspects of the analysis
process are discussed in the following paragraphs.

A full three dimensional modelling of the structure has been developed using frame and plate/shell
elements. The frame elements are typical two-nodded frame elements in space having six degrees
of freedom per node – three translations and three rotations in three mutually perpendicular axes
system. The plate/shell elements are of rectangular (or quadrilateral) and triangular shape. The
quadrilateral element has four nodes at its four corners. Each node has six degrees of freedom –
three translations and three rotations in a 3D space configuration. The frame elements are used to
model the columns while the plate/shell elements are used to model the ribs and the roof shell etc.
At base level, the columns are assumed to be hinged.

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 9

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

3.6 LOADING AND LOAD COMBINATION

The basic sources of loads are described in earlier section. These loads are applied on the model
in seven basic categories. These are as follows:

Load Case 1: Self-weight of structure (DL).

Load Case 2: Floor finish and partition wall (SDEAD).
Load Case 3: Live Load on the Structure (LL).
Load Case 4: Earthquake load on East-West Direction. (Ex)
Load Case 5: Earthquake load on North-South Direction. (Ey)
Load Case 6: Wind load on East-West Direction. (Wx)
Load Case 7: Wind load on North-South Direction. (Wy)

These seven basic load cases are analysed in ETABS 2016 V 16.2.1 the results are then combined
in accordance with the specifications set forth by BNBC.

BNBC specifies a number of combination options. These are as follows:

For Concrete Structure:

❖ 1.4 D
❖ 1.4 D + 1.7 L
❖ 0.9 D + 1.3 (W or 1.1 E)
❖ 0.75 (1.4 D + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E))
❖ 0.75 (1.4 D + 1.7 L + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E))
❖ 1.4 (D + L + E)
Where D stands for total dead load i.e. D = DL + SDEAD, L stands for live load i.e. L=LL, W
stands for wind load and E stands for earthquake load. When these seven basic load cases are
combined accordingly considering the direction of lateral loads, then according to BNBC 2006,
we obtain, after simplification, the following thirty combination cases:

❖ Combination Case 1: 1.4 D

❖ Combination Case 2:
❖ Combination Case 3:
❖ Combination Case 4:
❖ Combination Case 5:
❖ Combination Case 6:
❖ Combination Case 7:
❖ Combination Case 8:
❖ Combination Case 9:
❖ Combination Case 10:
1.4 D + 1.7 L
1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.275 Wx
1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.275 Wx
1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.275 Wy
1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.275 Wy
1.05 D + 1.275 Wx
1.05 D - 1.275 Wx
1.05 D + 1.275 Wy
1.05 D - 1.275 Wy

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 10

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

❖ Combination Case 11: 0.9 D + 1.3 Wx

❖ Combination Case 12:
❖ Combination Case 13:
❖ Combination Case 14:
❖ Combination Case 15:
❖ Combination Case 16:
❖ Combination Case 17:
❖ Combination Case 18:
❖ Combination Case 19:
❖ Combination Case 20:
❖ Combination Case 21:
❖ Combination Case 22:
❖ Combination Case 23:
❖ Combination Case 24:
❖ Combination Case 25:
❖ Combination Case 26:
❖ Combination Case 27:
❖ Combination Case 28:
❖ Combination Case 29:
❖ Combination Case 30:
0.9 D - 1.3 Wx
0.9 D + 1.3 Wy
0.9 D - 1.3 Wy
1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.4025 Ex
1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.4025 Ex
1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.4025 Ey
1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.4025 Ey
1.05 D + 1.4025 Ex
1.05 D - 1.4025 Ex
1.05 D + 1.4025 Ey
1.05 D - 1.4025 Ey
0.9 D + 1.43 Ex
0.9 D - 1.43 Ex
0.9 D + 1.43 Ey
0.9 D - 1.43 Ey
1.4 D + 1.4 L + 1.4 Ex
1.4 D + 1.4 L - 1.4 Ex
1.4 D + 1.4 L + 1.4 Ey
1.4 D + 1.4 L - 1.4 Ey

But in analysis, we do not calculate combination cases 27, 28, 29 & 30.

For Steel Structure:

❖ Combination Case1: 1.4 DL
❖ Combination Case2: 1.2 DL + 1.6 Lf + 0.5 Lr
❖ Combination Case3: 1.2 DL + 1.6 Lr + 0.5 Lf
❖ Combination Case4: 1.2 DL + 1.6 Lr + 0.8 Wx(+)
❖ Combination Case5: 1.2 DL + 1.6 Lr + 0.8 Wx(-)
❖ Combination Case6: 1.2 DL + 1.6 Lr + 0.8 Wy(+)
❖ Combination Case7: 1.2 DL + 1.6 Lr + 0.8 Wy(-)
❖ Combination Case8: 1.2 DL + 0.5 Lf + 0.5 Lr + 1.3 Wx(+)
❖ Combination Case9: 1.2 DL + 0.5 Lf + 0.5 Lr + 1.3 Wx(-)
❖ Combination Case10: 1.2 DL + 0.5 Lf + 0.5 Lr + 1.3 Wy(+)
❖ Combination Case11: 1.2 DL + 0.5 Lf + 0.5 Lr + 1.3 Wy(-)
❖ Combination Case12: 1.2 DL + 0.5 Lf + 1.5 Ex
❖ Combination Case13: 1.2 DL + 0.5 Lf - 1.5 Ex
❖ Combination Case14: 1.2 DL + 0.5 Lf + 1.5 Ey
❖ Combination Case15: 1.2 DL + 0.5 Lf - 1.5 Ey
❖ Combination Case16: 0.9 DL + 1.3 Wx(+)
❖ Combination Case17: 0.9 DL + 1.3 Wx(-)

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 11

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

❖ Combination Case18: 0.9 DL + 1.3 Wy(+)

❖ Combination Case19: 0.9 DL + 1.3 Wy(-)
❖ Combination Case20: 0.9 DL + 1.5 Ex
❖ Combination Case21: 0.9 DL - 1.5 Ex
❖ Combination Case22: 0.9 DL + 1.5 Ey
❖ Combination Case23: 0.9 DL - 1.5 Ey

3.7 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

In any finite element analysis, applying appropriate boundary conditions are important. Without
appropriate boundary conditions the model of building structure may not be stable. On the other
hand, application of excessive restraints may render the structure too stiff resulting in
development of unreasonable stresses. For a structure like this building having single footing, it
is reasonable to assume that the bases of columns are considered to be hinged due to isolated
foundation.

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 12

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

3.8 APPLICATION OF LOAD AND ANALYSIS

A static analysis is performed using the loadings and combinations of loads (mentioned earlier)
for the factory building. Some pictorial representation of the analysis results is shown in figures
below.

Figure 3.8.1: Deflected Shape of the building

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 13

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

4 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR BNBC

GUIDELINES (RECOMMENDED LOADINGS & LOAD
COMBINATIONS)

4.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION

Provided structural drawings of the project shows that spread footing had been used for this
project (Figure 4.1.1). We have checked adequacy of footing capacity & thickness of footing for
BNBC loadings & load combinations. Soil test report prepared by “Basic Soil and Construction”.

Figure 4.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 14

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 4.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 15

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Table 4.1.1: Foundation Size Check for Spread Footing

Provided
Bearing FoS (From Ultimate Load Reaction Available FoS Remarks
Joint Foundation Foundation
Capacity Soil Test Bearing Capacity (DL + LL) (For Existing (Minimum
Label Type Size
Report) Foundation) FoS=2.0)
sft ksf kip kip
46 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 41.96 4.90 OK
45 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 42.31 4.86 OK
44 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 41.07 5.01 OK
48 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 43.31 4.75 OK
42 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 57.66 3.57 OK
47 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 64.38 3.19 OK
173 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 64.45 3.19 OK
43 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 58.46 3.52 OK
3 F4 45.2 2.83 3 383.82 130.96 2.93 OK
30 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 109.81 3.00 OK
31 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 108.31 3.04 OK
41 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 167.09 2.95 OK
32 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 95.09 3.46 OK
33 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 94.10 3.50 OK
40 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 167.35 2.95 OK
34 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 76.38 4.31 OK
35 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 76.08 4.32 OK
39 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 132.96 3.71 OK
37 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 72.05 4.57 OK
36 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 73.58 4.47 OK
38 F4 45.2 2.83 3 383.82 119.96 3.20 OK
4 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 91.90 3.58 OK
89 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 63.06 3.26 OK
49 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 69.37 4.74 OK
5 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 134.98 4.55 OK
88 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 85.60 2.40 OK
105 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 58.77 3.85 OK
133 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 93.17 4.94 OK
145 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 92.94 4.96 OK
157 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 93.59 4.92 OK
50 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 106.00 5.79 OK
6 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 72.15 4.56 OK
90 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 67.07 40.59 OK
106 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 30.28 7.47 OK
51 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 56.80 5.79 OK
7 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 145.57 4.22 OK
91 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 61.33 44.39 OK
107 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 35.32 6.40 OK
134 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.23 5.05 OK
146 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.73 5.08 OK
158 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.26 5.05 OK
52 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 109.80 5.59 OK
8 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 82.77 3.97 OK
92 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 65.16 41.78 OK
108 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 35.24 6.42 OK
53 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 55.01 5.98 OK
19 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 142.14 4.32 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 16

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Provided
Bearing FoS (From Ultimate Load Reaction Available FoS Remarks
Joint Foundation Foundation
Capacity Soil Test Bearing Capacity (DL + LL) (For Existing (Minimum
Label Type Size
Report) Foundation) FoS=2.0)
sft ksf kip kip
93 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 63.65 42.77 OK
109 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 35.30 6.41 OK
135 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.91 5.07 OK
147 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.37 5.10 OK
159 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.89 5.07 OK
64 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 112.31 5.47 OK
9 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 80.83 4.07 OK
94 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 65.00 41.88 OK
110 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 35.04 6.45 OK
54 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 57.30 5.74 OK
20 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 142.59 4.31 OK
95 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 63.61 42.80 OK
111 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 35.26 6.42 OK
136 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.91 5.07 OK
148 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.37 5.10 OK
160 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.89 5.07 OK
65 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 112.55 5.46 OK
10 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 80.89 4.07 OK
96 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 64.99 41.89 OK
112 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 34.98 6.47 OK
55 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 55.32 5.95 OK
21 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 140.02 4.39 OK
97 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 63.63 42.79 OK
113 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 35.19 6.43 OK
137 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 87.92 5.24 OK
149 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.40 5.10 OK
161 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.91 5.07 OK
66 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 110.23 5.57 OK
11 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 82.90 3.97 OK
98 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 64.98 41.89 OK
114 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 34.93 6.48 OK
56 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 57.27 5.75 OK
22 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 138.61 4.43 OK
99 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 63.38 42.96 OK
115 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 35.14 6.44 OK
138 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 88.12 5.23 OK
150 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.66 5.08 OK
162 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.17 5.05 OK
67 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 110.59 5.55 OK
12 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 77.10 7.97 OK
100 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 65.22 41.74 OK
116 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 35.09 6.45 OK
57 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 53.45 6.16 OK
23 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 136.18 4.51 OK
101 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 61.43 44.32 OK
117 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 33.88 6.68 OK
139 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 88.10 5.23 OK
151 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.49 5.09 OK
163 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.98 5.06 OK
68 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 110.52 5.56 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 17

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

13 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 75.10 4.38 OK

102 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 76.50 35.59 OK
118 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 36.67 6.17 OK
58 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 57.27 5.74 OK
24 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 122.85 5.00 OK
103 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 49.16 55.38 OK
104 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 19.87 11.38 OK
140 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 87.92 5.24 OK
152 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.37 5.10 OK
164 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.86 5.07 OK
69 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 110.23 5.57 OK
14 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 57.32 5.74 OK
59 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 55.33 5.95 OK
25 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 108.35 5.67 OK
141 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 87.94 5.24 OK
153 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.40 5.10 OK
165 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.90 5.07 OK
70 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 112.64 5.45 OK
15 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 55.87 5.89 OK
60 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 61.16 5.38 OK
26 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 112.02 5.48 OK
176 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 9.01 22.83 OK
175 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 9.09 22.62 OK
142 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 93.19 4.94 OK
174 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 8.97 22.93 OK
172 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 8.56 24.02 OK
154 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 95.76 4.81 OK
171 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 9.50 21.64 OK
170 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 8.38 24.54 OK
166 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 96.14 4.79 OK
169 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 10.90 18.87 OK
71 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 116.47 5.27 OK
16 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 55.49 5.93 OK
131 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 7.29 28.21 OK
61 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 55.34 5.94 OK
130 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 4.76 43.21 OK
27 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 107.69 5.70 OK
143 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 88.35 5.21 OK
155 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.86 5.07 OK
167 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.33 5.04 OK
72 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 110.44 5.56 OK
129 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 5.56 36.95 OK
17 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 55.42 5.94 OK
128 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 6.80 30.25 OK
62 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 57.21 5.75 OK
28 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 105.71 5.81 OK
144 F1A 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.33 5.04 OK
156 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 95.22 4.84 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 18

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

168 F1A 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 93.12 4.95 OK

127 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 12.09 17.01 OK
73 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 106.92 5.74 OK
119 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 23.04 118.15 OK
120 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 42.06 64.73 OK
121 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 42.69 63.77 OK
122 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 37.17 73.25 OK
123 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 42.63 63.86 OK
124 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 41.59 65.45 OK
125 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 18.51 147.12 OK
18 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 58.43 5.63 OK
126 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 8.93 23.02 OK
63 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 57.71 5.70 OK
29 F4 45.2 2.83 3 383.82 125.92 3.05 OK
77 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 77.84 4.23 OK
78 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 75.77 4.34 OK
87 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 138.52 3.56 OK
79 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 106.48 3.09 OK
80 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 106.08 3.10 OK
86 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 150.72 3.27 OK
81 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 95.96 3.43 OK
82 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 95.46 3.45 OK
85 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 133.22 3.70 OK
84 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 88.91 3.70 OK
83 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 90.03 3.65 OK
74 F4 45.2 2.83 3 383.82 126.78 3.03 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 19

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Table 4.1.2: Punching Shear Check for Spread Footing

f'C= 4168 psi

Factored Reaction Column Column Punching

Foundation
Joint Foundation Column (At Column Length, Width, Shear DCR for
Thickness Remark
Label Type Type Center) L B Capacity Punching

(1.4*DL+1.7*LL) in in in kip
46 F8 C8 59 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.24 OK
45 F8 C8 61 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.25 OK
44 F8 C8 59 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.24 OK
48 F8 C8 61 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.25 OK
42 F8 C9 82 14 17.000 17.000 270 0.30 OK
47 F8 C10 94 14 14.000 12.000 232 0.40 OK
173 F8 C11 94 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.44 OK
43 F8 C12 84 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.34 OK
3 F4 C4 189 18 34.000 32.000 632 0.30 OK
30 F6 C6 157 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.50 OK
31 F6 C6 155 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.49 OK
41 F3 C3 241 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.35 OK
32 F6 C6 135 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.43 OK
33 F6 C6 134 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.43 OK
40 F3 C3 242 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.35 OK
34 F6 C6 107 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.34 OK
35 F6 C6 106 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.34 OK
39 F3 C3 192 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.28 OK
37 F6 C6 101 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.32 OK
36 F6 C6 103 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.33 OK
38 F4 C4 173 18 34.000 32.000 632 0.27 OK
4 F5 C5 132 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.53 OK
89 F7 C7b 93 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.38 OK
49 F5 C5 97 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.39 OK
5 F2 C2 199 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.21 OK
88 F7 C7b 127 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.52 OK
105 F10 C11 87 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.41 OK
133 F1a C1 143 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.21 OK
145 F1 C1 143 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.21 OK
157 F1a C1 144 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.21 OK
50 F2 C2 153 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.16 OK
6 F5 C5 104 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.42 OK
90 F9 C10 98 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.33 OK
106 F10 C11 45 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.21 OK
51 F5 C5 80 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.32 OK
7 F2 C2 214 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.23 OK
91 F9 C10 91 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.31 OK
107 F10 C11 52 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK
134 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
146 F1 C1 139 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
158 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
52 F2 C2 160 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.17 OK
8 F5 C5 119 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.48 OK
92 F9 C10 97 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.33 OK
108 F10 C11 52 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 20

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Factored Reaction Column Column Punching

Foundation
Joint Foundation Column (At Column Length, Width, Shear DCR for
Thickness Remark
Label Type Type Center) L B Capacity Punching
(1.4*DL+1.7*LL) in in in kip
53 F5 C5 77 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.31 OK
19 F2 C2 209 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.22 OK
93 F9 C10 94 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.32 OK
109 F10 C11 52 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK
135 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
147 F1 C1 139 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
159 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
64 F2 C2 163 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.18 OK
9 F5 C5 116 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.47 OK
94 F9 C10 96 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.32 OK
110 F10 C11 52 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK
54 F5 C5 80 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.33 OK
20 F2 C2 209 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.22 OK
95 F9 C10 94 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.32 OK
111 F10 C11 52 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK
136 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
148 F1 C1 139 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
160 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
65 F2 C2 164 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.18 OK
10 F5 C5 116 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.47 OK
96 F9 C10 96 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.32 OK
112 F10 C11 51 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK
55 F5 C5 77 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.31 OK
21 F2 C2 205 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.22 OK
97 F9 C10 94 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.32 OK
113 F10 C11 52 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK
137 F1a C1 135 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.19 OK
149 F1 C1 139 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
161 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
66 F2 C2 161 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.17 OK
11 F5 C5 119 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.48 OK
98 F9 C10 96 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.32 OK
114 F10 C11 51 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK
56 F5 C5 80 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.33 OK
22 F2 C2 203 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.22 OK
99 F9 C10 94 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.32 OK
115 F10 C11 52 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK
138 F1a C1 135 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.19 OK
150 F1 C1 139 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
162 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
67 F2 C2 161 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.17 OK
12 F2 C5 111 24 17.000 12.000 655 0.17 OK
100 F9 C10 97 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.33 OK
116 F10 C11 52 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.24 OK
57 F5 C5 75 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.30 OK
23 F2 C2 199 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.21 OK
101 F9 C10 91 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.31 OK
117 F10 C11 50 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.23 OK
139 F1a C1 135 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.19 OK
151 F1 C1 139 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 21

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

163 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK

68 F2 C2 161 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.17 OK
13 F5 C5 108 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.44 OK
102 F9 C10 113 16 14.000 12.000 297 0.38 OK
118 F10 C11 54 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.25 OK
58 F5 C5 80 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.33 OK
24 F2 C2 180 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.19 OK
103 F9 C11 72 16 12.000 10.000 274 0.26 OK
104 F10 C11 29 14 12.000 10.000 212 0.14 OK
140 F1a C1 135 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.19 OK
152 F1 C1 139 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
164 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
69 F2 C2 161 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.17 OK
14 F5 C5 80 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.33 OK
59 F5 C5 78 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.31 OK
25 F2 C2 157 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.17 OK
141 F1a C1 135 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.19 OK
153 F1 C1 139 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
165 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
70 F2 C2 164 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.18 OK
15 F5 C5 79 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.32 OK
60 F5 C5 86 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.35 OK
26 F2 C2 163 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.18 OK
176 F7 C7 12 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.05 OK
175 F7 C7 13 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.05 OK
142 F1a C1 142 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
174 F7 C7 12 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.05 OK
172 F7 C7 12 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.05 OK
154 F1 C1 146 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.21 OK
171 F7 C7 13 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.05 OK
170 F7 C7 12 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.05 OK
166 F1a C1 147 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.21 OK
169 F7 C7 16 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.06 OK
71 F2 C2 170 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.18 OK
16 F5 C5 78 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.32 OK
131 F7 C7 10 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.04 OK
61 F5 C5 78 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.31 OK
130 F7 C7 7 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.03 OK
27 F2 C2 156 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.17 OK
143 F1a C1 135 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
155 F1 C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
167 F1a C1 140 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
72 F2 C2 161 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.17 OK
129 F7 C7 8 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.03 OK
17 F5 C5 78 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.32 OK
128 F7 C7 9 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.04 OK
62 F5 C5 80 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.33 OK
28 F2 C2 153 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.16 OK
144 F1A C1 141 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.20 OK
156 F1 C1 147 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.21 OK
168 F1A C1 143 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.21 OK
127 F7 C7 18 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.07 OK
73 F2 C2 155 24 32.000 27.000 931 0.17 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 22

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

119 F9 C12 34 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.11 OK

120 F9 C12 63 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.20 OK
121 F9 C12 64 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.20 OK
122 F9 C12 55 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.17 OK
123 F9 C12 64 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.20 OK
124 F9 C12 62 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.20 OK
125 F9 C12 26 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.08 OK
18 F5 C5 82 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.33 OK
126 F7 C7 13 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.05 OK
63 F5 C5 81 14 17.000 12.000 246 0.33 OK
29 F4 C4 181 18 34.000 32.000 632 0.29 OK
77 F6 C6 109 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.35 OK
78 F6 C6 106 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.34 OK
87 F3 C3 201 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.29 OK
79 F6 C6 152 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.49 OK
80 F6 C6 152 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.48 OK
86 F3 C3 220 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.32 OK
81 F6 C6 138 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.44 OK
82 F6 C6 137 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.44 OK
85 F3 C3 193 20 32.000 27.000 694 0.28 OK
84 F6 C6 125 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.40 OK
83 F6 C6 127 16 17.000 12.000 314 0.40 OK
74 F4 C4 182 18 34.000 32.000 632 0.29 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 23

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

4.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN

4.2.1 Checking Adequacy of RCC Column

Results has been shown based on model grid. Assessment of columns (P-M-M Interaction Ratio)
according to BNBC guidelines. According to standard practice, column with P-M-M value greater
than 1.0 is considered as inadequate. The analysis results show that most of the Columns are
overstressed as per BNBC guideline (recommended loadings & load combinations).

Figure 4.2.1: Column Layout Plan

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 24

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 3.2.2 to Figure 3.2.15 shows the condition of columns Red coloured members having
DCR>1, inadequate.

Figure 4.2.2: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-A

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.3: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-B

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.4: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-C

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.5: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-D

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 25

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 4.2.6: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-E

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.7: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-F

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.8: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-G

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.9: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-H

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 26

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 4.2.10: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-I

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.11: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-J

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.12: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-K

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.13: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-L

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 27

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 4.2.14: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-M

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.2.15: Conditions of RCC Columns in Grid-N

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

4.2.1.1 Checking Adequacy of Steel Column

Results has been shown based on model grid. Assessment of columns (P-M-M Interaction Ratio)
according to BNBC guidelines. According to standard practice, column with P-M-M value greater
than 1.0 is considered as inadequate. The analysis results show that most of the Columns are
adequate as per BNBC guideline (recommended loadings & load combinations).

Figure 4.2.16: Conditions of Steel column

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 28

 [SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

4.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF BEAMS

4.3.1.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam

Figure 3.3.1 shows the condition of RCC grade beam under lateral loading. Most of the grade
beams are inadequate under loading (according to BNBC Loadings & load combinations).

Figure 4.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams.

Beam Id. Provided Reif. At

Provided Reinf. Required Required
In Middle-Bottom
At Top-Edge (in2) Reinf. (in2) Reinf. (in2)
Drawing (in2)
GB-1 3.05 As Shown 2.22 As Shown
GB-2 1.87 As Shown 1.56 As Shown
GB-3 2.56 As Shown 1.908 As Shown
GB-4 1.87 As Shown 1.56 As Shown
GB-5 1.56 As Shown 1.734 As Shown
GB-6 1.872 As Shown 1.9 As Shown

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 29

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

4.3.1.2 Evaluation of Steel Beams

Figure 3.3.2 & Figure 3.3.4 shows the condition of main beams & sub-beams under lateral
loading. Some of the beams and sub-beams are inadequate under loading according to BNBC
code.

Figure 4.3.2: Conditions of steel beam of Ridge 1

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.3: Conditions of steel beams at mezzanine level.

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 30

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 4.3.4: Conditions of steel beam Ridge 2

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 31

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

4.3.1.1 Evaluation of Steel Rafters and Bracings

Figure 3.3.5 to Figure 3.3.17 shows the condition of Rafters and Bracing under lateral loading.
Most of the rafters are inadequate under BNBC loading.

Figure 4.3.5: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 3

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.6: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 5

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.7: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 7

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.8: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 9

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 32

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 4.3.9: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 11

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.10: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 13

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.11: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 15

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.12: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 17

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 33

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 4.3.13: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 21

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.14: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 24

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.15: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 24

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.16: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 30

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 34

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 4.3.17: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 32

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 4.3.18: Conditions of steel Roof Bracing

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 35

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

5 CONCLUSION

According to BNBC load combinations-

For Steel Members

➢ Some of the steel Beams are overstressed.

➢ Few of the steel Rafters are overstressed.
➢ Most of the roof bracings are inadequate.

For RCC Members

➢ Most of the RCC columns are inadequate.

➢ All the grade beams are adequate.
➢ All the foundations are adequate in bearing capacity and in punching shear capacity.

6 RECOMMENDATION

We recommend to rectify the overstressed RCC Columns shown in this report with proper
rectification design to meet loadings and load combinations as per BNBC. The overstressed steel
rafters and beams are also recommended to rectify. Until rectification the factory can operate its
operation under allowable load.

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 36

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

7 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AFTER

RETROFITTING

7.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION

Provided structural drawings of the project shows that spread footing had been used for this
project (Figure 6.1.1). We have checked adequacy of footing capacity & thickness of footing for
BNBC loadings & load combinations. Soil test report prepared by “Basic Soil and Construction”.

Figure 7.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 37

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 38

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Table 7.1.1: Foundation Check For Bearing Capacity

Provided
Bearing FoS (From Ultimate Load Reaction Available FoS Remarks
Joint Foundation Foundation
Capacity Soil Test Bearing Capacity (DL + LL) (For Existing (Minimum
Label Type Size
Report) Foundation) FoS=2.0)
sft ksf kip kip
46 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 40.23 5.11 OK
45 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 42.49 4.84 OK
44 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 40.85 5.03 OK
48 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 41.47 4.96 OK
42 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 63.95 3.22 OK
47 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 61.96 3.32 OK
173 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 60.95 3.37 OK
43 F8 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 65.53 3.14 OK
3 F4 45.2 2.83 3 383.82 131.61 2.92 OK
30 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 122.37 2.69 OK
31 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 120.58 2.73 OK
41 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 167.15 2.95 OK
32 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 109.06 3.02 OK
33 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 109.22 3.01 OK
40 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 168.60 2.93 OK
34 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 87.48 3.76 OK
35 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 87.47 3.76 OK
39 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 132.98 3.71 OK
37 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 83.43 3.94 OK
36 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 85.23 3.86 OK
38 F4 45.2 2.83 3 383.82 120.96 3.17 OK
4 RF5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 106.59 3.09 OK
89 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 59.75 3.44 OK
49 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 81.79 4.02 OK
5 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 129.33 4.75 OK
88 RF7a 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 99.15 2.07 OK
105 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 65.52 3.45 OK
133 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 95.48 4.82 OK
145 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 95.42 4.83 OK
157 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 95.54 4.82 OK
50 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 105.38 5.83 OK
6 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 87.46 3.76 OK
90 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 75.06 36.27 OK
106 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 30.53 7.41 OK
51 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 69.86 4.71 OK
7 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 142.41 4.31 OK
91 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 70.60 38.56 OK
107 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 43.48 5.20 OK
134 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.71 5.02 OK
146 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.23 5.05 OK
158 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.85 5.01 OK
52 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 108.74 5.65 OK
8 RF5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 97.86 3.36 OK
92 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 72.91 37.34 OK
108 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 43.07 5.25 OK
53 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 68.04 4.84 OK
19 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 162.87 3.77 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 39

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Provided
Bearing FoS (From Ultimate Load Reaction Available FoS Remarks
Joint Foundation Foundation
Capacity Soil Test Bearing Capacity (DL + LL) (For Existing (Minimum
Label Type Size
Report) Foundation) FoS=2.0)
sft ksf kip kip
93 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 72.56 37.52 OK
109 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 43.07 5.25 OK
135 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.26 5.05 OK
147 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.86 5.07 OK
159 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.42 5.04 OK
64 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 111.21 5.52 OK
9 RF5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 95.49 3.45 OK
94 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 73.06 37.26 OK
110 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 42.94 5.27 OK
54 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 70.37 4.67 OK
20 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 163.24 3.76 OK
95 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 72.61 37.49 OK
111 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 42.92 5.27 OK
136 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.26 5.05 OK
148 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.87 5.07 OK
160 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.41 5.04 OK
65 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 111.44 5.51 OK
10 RF5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 95.58 3.44 OK
96 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 73.09 37.25 OK
112 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 42.82 5.28 OK
55 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 68.35 4.81 OK
21 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 160.56 3.82 OK
97 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 72.67 37.46 OK
113 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 42.80 5.28 OK
137 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 88.28 5.22 OK
149 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.90 5.07 OK
161 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.43 5.04 OK
66 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 109.16 5.63 OK
11 RF5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 97.70 3.37 OK
98 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 73.10 37.24 OK
114 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 42.69 5.30 OK
56 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 69.91 4.71 OK
22 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 159.74 3.84 OK
99 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 72.56 37.52 OK
115 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 42.66 5.30 OK
138 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 89.58 5.14 OK
150 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 92.30 4.99 OK
162 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 92.85 4.96 OK
67 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 110.14 5.58 OK
12 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 92.02 6.67 OK
100 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 73.24 37.17 OK
116 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 42.62 5.31 OK
57 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 66.43 4.95 OK
23 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 134.17 4.58 OK
101 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 71.69 37.97 OK
117 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 41.80 5.41 OK
139 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 89.71 5.13 OK
151 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 92.04 5.00 OK
163 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 92.53 4.98 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 40

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

68 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 110.04 5.58 OK

13 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 89.79 3.66 OK
102 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 86.46 31.49 OK
118 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 43.07 5.25 OK
58 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 70.33 4.68 OK
24 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 140.41 4.37 OK
103 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 58.51 46.53 OK
104 F10 26.6 2.83 3 226.18 26.96 8.39 OK
140 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 88.31 5.22 OK
152 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.86 5.07 OK
164 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.38 5.04 OK
69 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 109.19 5.62 OK
14 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 70.14 4.69 OK
59 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 68.34 4.81 OK
25 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 107.11 5.73 OK
141 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 88.45 5.21 OK
153 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 90.90 5.07 OK
165 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.47 5.04 OK
70 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 111.35 5.52 OK
15 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 68.89 4.78 OK
60 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 72.17 4.56 OK
26 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 136.52 4.50 OK
176 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 13.96 14.73 OK
175 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 13.80 14.90 OK
142 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 93.01 4.95 OK
174 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 13.73 14.97 OK
172 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 13.62 15.09 OK
154 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 95.57 4.82 OK
171 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 13.85 14.84 OK
170 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 13.43 15.31 OK
166 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 123.16 3.74 OK
169 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 19.87 10.35 OK
71 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 132.04 4.65 OK
16 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 68.29 4.82 OK
131 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 6.56 31.35 OK
61 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 68.19 4.82 OK
130 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 4.72 43.58 OK
27 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 107.38 5.72 OK
143 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 89.14 5.17 OK
155 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.46 5.04 OK
167 F1a 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 91.93 5.01 OK
72 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 109.40 5.61 OK
129 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 5.80 35.44 OK
17 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 68.41 4.81 OK
128 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 6.67 30.82 OK
62 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 70.26 4.68 OK
28 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 105.31 5.83 OK
144 F1A 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 92.52 4.98 OK
156 F1 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 99.13 4.65 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 41

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

168 F1A 54.3 2.83 3 460.58 96.56 4.77 OK

127 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 11.48 17.92 OK
73 F2 72.3 2.83 3 614.11 105.69 5.81 OK
119 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 22.55 120.72 OK
120 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 42.34 64.30 OK
121 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 43.28 62.90 OK
122 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 37.67 72.27 OK
123 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 43.21 63.00 OK
124 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 42.91 63.45 OK
125 F9 320.7 2.83 3 2722.38 15.17 179.49 OK
18 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 71.44 4.60 OK
126 F7 24.2 2.83 3 205.62 8.67 23.72 OK
63 F5 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 70.61 4.66 OK
29 F4 45.2 2.83 3 383.82 126.49 3.03 OK
77 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 89.01 3.70 OK
78 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 87.21 3.77 OK
87 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 138.43 3.56 OK
79 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 118.07 2.79 OK
80 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 117.09 2.81 OK
86 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 149.04 3.31 OK
81 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 107.29 3.07 OK
82 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 106.36 3.09 OK
85 F3 58.1 2.83 3 493.48 133.52 3.70 OK
84 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 100.03 3.29 OK
83 F6 38.8 2.83 3 328.99 100.98 3.26 OK
74 F4 45.2 2.83 3 383.82 128.10 3.00 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 42

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Table 7.1.2: Punching Shear Check for Spread Footing

f'C= 4168 psi

Factored Reaction Column Column Punching

Foundation
Joint Foundation Column (At Column Length, Width, Shear DCR for
Thickness Remark
Label Type Type Center) L B Capacity Punching

(1.4*DL+1.7*LL) in in in kip

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 43

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

53 F5 RC5 95 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.81 OK

19 F2 RC2 238 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.55 OK
93 F9 RC10 107 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.67 OK
109 F10 RC11 63 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.54 OK
135 F1a C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
147 F1 C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
159 F1a C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
64 F2 C2 162 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.37 OK
9 RF5 RC5 137 17 1.417 1.000 187 0.66 OK
94 F9 RC10 108 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.67 OK
110 F10 RC11 62 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.54 OK
54 F5 RC5 99 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.84 OK
20 F2 RC2 238 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.55 OK
95 F9 RC10 107 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.67 OK
111 F10 RC11 62 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.54 OK
136 F1a C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
148 F1 C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
160 F1a C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
65 F2 C2 162 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.38 OK
10 RF5 RC5 137 17 1.417 1.000 187 0.66 OK
96 F9 RC10 108 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.67 OK
112 F10 RC11 62 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.54 OK
55 F5 RC5 96 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.81 OK
21 F2 RC2 233 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.54 OK
97 F9 RC10 107 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.67 OK
113 F10 RC11 62 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.54 OK
137 F1a C1 135 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.47 OK
149 F1 C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
161 F1a C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
66 F2 C2 159 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.37 OK
11 RF5 RC5 140 17 1.417 1.000 187 0.68 OK
98 F9 RC10 108 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.67 OK
114 F10 RC11 62 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.54 OK
56 F5 RC5 98 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.83 OK
22 F2 RC2 232 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.54 OK
99 F9 RC10 107 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.67 OK
115 F10 RC11 62 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.54 OK
138 F1a C1 137 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.47 OK
150 F1 C1 142 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.49 OK
162 F1a C1 142 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.49 OK
67 F2 C2 160 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.37 OK
12 F2 RC5 132 24 1.417 1.000 409 0.32 OK
100 F9 RC10 108 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.67 OK
116 F10 RC11 62 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.54 OK
57 F5 RC5 93 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.79 OK
23 F2 C2 196 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.45 OK
101 F9 RC10 106 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.66 OK
117 F10 RC11 61 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.53 OK
139 F1a C1 137 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.47 OK
151 F1 C1 141 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.49 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 44

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

163 F1a C1 142 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.49 OK

68 F2 C2 160 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.37 OK
13 F5 RC5 129 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.99 OK
102 F9 RC10 128 16 1.000 1.167 161 0.79 OK
118 F10 RC11 63 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.54 OK
58 F5 RC5 99 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.84 OK
24 F2 RC2 204 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.47 OK
103 F9 RC11 86 16 0.833 1.000 159 0.54 OK
104 F10 RC11 39 14 0.833 1.000 115 0.34 OK
140 F1a C1 135 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.47 OK
152 F1 C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
164 F1a C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
69 F2 C2 159 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.37 OK
14 F5 RC5 98 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.83 OK
59 F5 RC5 96 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.81 OK
25 F2 C2 155 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.36 OK
141 F1a C1 135 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.47 OK
153 F1 C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
165 F1a C1 141 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
70 F2 C2 162 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.37 OK
15 F5 RC5 97 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.82 OK
60 F5 RC5 101 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.86 OK
26 F2 RC2 198 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.46 OK
176 F7 RC7 19 14 1.000 1.417 118 0.16 OK
175 F7 RC7 19 14 1.000 1.417 118 0.16 OK
142 F1a C1 142 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.49 OK
174 F7 RC7 19 14 1.000 1.417 118 0.16 OK
172 F7 RC7 19 14 1.000 1.417 118 0.16 OK
154 F1 C1 146 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.50 OK
171 F7 RC7 19 14 1.000 1.417 118 0.16 OK
170 F7 RC7 19 14 1.000 1.417 118 0.16 OK
166 F1a RC1 185 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.64 OK
169 F7 RC7 29 14 1.000 1.417 118 0.25 OK
71 F2 RC2 191 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.44 OK
16 F5 RC5 96 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.81 OK
131 F7 C7 9 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.08 OK
61 F5 RC5 96 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.81 OK
130 F7 C7a 6 14 1.000 1.000 116 0.06 OK
27 F2 C2 156 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.36 OK
143 F1a C1 137 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.47 OK
155 F1 C1 140 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.48 OK
167 F1a C1 141 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.49 OK
72 F2 C2 159 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.37 OK
129 F7 C7a 8 14 1.000 1.000 116 0.07 OK
17 F5 RC5 96 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.81 OK
128 F7 C7 9 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.08 OK
62 F5 RC5 98 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.83 OK
28 F2 C2 152 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.35 OK
144 F1A C1 142 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.49 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 45

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

156 F1 C1 153 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.53 OK

168 F1A C1 149 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.51 OK
127 F7 C7 16 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.14 OK
73 F2 C2 153 24 2.667 2.250 433 0.35 OK
119 F9 RC12 33 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.21 OK
120 F9 RC12 63 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.39 OK
121 F9 RC12 65 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.40 OK
122 F9 RC12 55 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.34 OK
123 F9 RC12 65 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.40 OK
124 F9 RC12 64 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.39 OK
125 F9 C12 22 16 1.417 1.000 162 0.13 OK
18 F5 RC5 101 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.85 OK
126 F7 C7 12 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.10 OK
63 F5 RC5 99 14 1.417 1.000 118 0.84 OK
29 F4 C4 182 18 2.833 2.667 234 0.78 OK
77 F6 RC6 125 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.77 OK
78 F6 RC6 122 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.75 OK
87 F3 C3 200 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.69 OK
79 F6 RC6 169 16 1.000 1.417 162 1.04 OK
80 F6 RC6 167 16 1.000 1.417 162 1.03 OK
86 F3 C3 217 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.75 OK
81 F6 RC6 153 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.95 OK
82 F6 RC6 152 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.94 OK
85 F3 C3 193 20 2.667 2.250 290 0.67 OK
84 F6 RC6 140 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.87 OK
83 F6 RC6 142 16 1.000 1.417 162 0.88 OK
74 F4 C4 184 18 2.833 2.667 234 0.79 OK

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 46

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

7.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF RCC COLUMN

Results has been shown based on model grid. Assessment of columns (P-M-M Interaction Ratio)
according to BNBC guidelines. According to standard practice, column with P-M-M value greater
than 1.0 is considered as inadequate. The analysis results show that most of the Columns are
overstressed as per BNBC guideline (recommended loadings & load combinations).

Figure 7.2.1: RCC Column Layout Plan

Figure 6.2.2 to Figure 6.2.14 shows the RCC columns up to the particular level.

Figure 7.2.2: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-A

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 47

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.2.3: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-B

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.2.4: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-C

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.2.5: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-D

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.2.6: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-E

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 48

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.2.7: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-F

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.2.8: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-G

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.2.9: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-H

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.2.10: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-I

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 49

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.2.11: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-J

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.2.12: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-K

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.2.13: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-L

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.2.14: Conditions of RCC Members in Grid-M

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 50

 [SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

7.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF BEAMS

7.3.1.1 Evaluation of Grade Beams

Figure 6.3.1 shows the condition of grade beams loading. All of the grade are adequate under
loading according to BNBC code after retrofitting.

Figure 7.3.1: Conditions of Grade Beam

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Beam Id. Provided Reinf. Required Provided Reif. At Required

In At Top-Edge Reinf. Middle-Bottom Reinf.
Drawing (in2) (in2) (in2) (in2)
GB-1 3.05 2.46 2.22 1.36
GB-2 1.87 1.3 1.56 0.65
GB-3 2.56 2.65 1.908 1
GB-4 1.87 3.2 1.56 2.1
GB-5 1.56 1.65 1.734 1.57
GB-6 1.872 1.5 1.9 0.72

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 51

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

7.3.1.1 Evaluation of Steel Beams:

The following figure shows the condition of steel beams & sub-beams, rafters and bracings under
lateral loading. All of the beams & sub-beams, rafters and bracings are adequate under loading
according to BNBC code after retrofitting.

Figure 7.3.2: Conditions of steel beam of Ridge 1

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 52

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.3.3: Conditions of steel beam Ridge 2

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 53

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.3.4: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 3

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.5: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 5

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.6: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 7

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.7: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 9

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 54

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.3.8: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 11

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.9: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 13

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.10: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 15

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.11: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 17

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.12: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 21

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 55

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.3.13: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 24

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.14: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 27

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.15: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 30

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.16: Conditions of steel rafter of Grid 32

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 56

[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Dye Shed)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 7.3.17: Conditions of horizontal steel rafter

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.18: Conditions of horizontal steel rafter

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

Figure 7.3.19: Conditions of horizontal steel rafter

(Red coloured members having DCR>1, inadequate).

8 DISCLAIMER

The assessment engineer made the above observations & recommendations from Core test, DT &
NDT results & mathematical modelling of the building. We applied our best engineering
judgments. We do not bear responsibility for any deviation from the predicted behaviour of the
structure caused by uncertainties of performance or calamities.

STHAPONA CONSULTANTS Page | 57