DEA Report-Smart Jacket 6-Storied Bldg.

DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT OF
SMART JACKET (BD) LIMITED
Project type: 6- Storied RCC Building.

Location: Plot no - 11, 12 & 13, Sector - 1/A, Road - 05,
CEPZ, Chittagong, Bangladesh
Revision-02
Client: SMART JACKET (BD) LIMITED
Assessed by-
Engr. Md. Mehedi Hasan
Lead Structural Engineer,
Sthapona Consultants
M.Sc. (Structural Engineering, BUET) B.Sc. (BUET),
MIEB -24748, Rajuk Reg. DMINB-CE0233.
Submitted by
YOUR SAFETY IS OUR CONCERN

1st Floor (2A), House#01, Road#10, Nikunjo-2, Dhaka-1229.
Office: +880-1762-777666.
sthaponaconsultants@gmail.com
[SMART JACKET (BD) LIMITED]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................1
1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................2
1.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 GENERAL OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................................ 3
2 DESTRUCTIVE & NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING............................................................4
2.1 EVALUATION OF CONCRETE STRENGTH FROM CORE TEST .............................. 4
3 ANALYSIS FOR STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY .......................................................................5
3.1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ......................................................................................................... 5
3.2 CODES AND PRACTICES ....................................................................................................... 6
3.3 MATERIAL PROPERTY.......................................................................................................... 6
3.4 LOADS .......................................................................................................................................... 6
3.4.1 Dead Loads ....................................................................................................................................................7
3.4.2 Live Load ........................................................................................................................................................7
3.4.3 Wind Load (W).............................................................................................................................................7
3.4.4 Earthquake Load (E)..................................................................................................................................7
3.5 METHOD OF ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 8

3.6 LOADING AND LOAD COMBINATION ............................................................................ 8
3.7 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. 10
3.8 APPLICATION OF LOAD AND ANALYSIS.................................................................... 10
4 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR 42 PSF LIVE LOAD .................. 12
4.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION ................................................................. 12
4.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN ........................................................................... 17
4.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF BEAMS ............................................................................... 35
4.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam .................................................................................................................... 35
4.3.2 Evaluation of Roof Beam ....................................................................................................................... 37
4.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB ........................................................................... 42

5 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR 63 PSF LIVE LOAD .................. 44
5.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF BEAMS ............................................................................... 66
5.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam .................................................................................................................... 66
5.3.2 Evaluation of Roof Beam ....................................................................................................................... 68
5.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB ........................................................................... 73

6 CHECK FOR DRIFT ............................................................................................................ 75
7 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................ 76
8 RECOMMENDATION ............................................................................................................. 76
9 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AFTER RETROFITTING .... 77
10 DISCLAIMER .......................................................................................................................... 97
List of Figures and Tables
Figure 1.1.1: Location of Project ................................................................................... 2
Figure 3.1.1: Beam Slab System of the Building .............................................................. 5
Figure 3.1.2: 3D View of Analytical Model ...................................................................... 6
Figure 3.8.1: Applied Floor Finish in Typical Floor (25psf) ........................................... 11
Figure 3.8.2: Applied Live Load in Typical Floor (42 psf), As per NTPA ..................... 11
Figure 3.8.3: Deflected Shape of the building ................................................................. 12
Figure 4.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan ............................................................................. 13
Figure 4.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model .................................................................... 14
Figure 4.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Built Drawing.............................................. 18
Figure 4.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Model Snapshot. .............................................. 18
Figure 4.2.3: Condition of Column in Grid A ................................................................. 19
Figure 4.2.4: Condition of Column in Grid B ................................................................. 20
Figure 4.2.5: Condition of Column in Grid C ................................................................. 21
Figure 4.2.6: Condition of Column in Grid D ................................................................. 22
Figure 4.2.7: Condition of Column in Grid E.................................................................. 23
Figure 4.2.8: Condition of Column in Grid F .................................................................. 24
Figure 4.2.9: Condition of Column in Grid G ................................................................. 25
Figure 4.2.10: Condition of Column in Grid H ............................................................... 26
Figure 4.2.11: Condition of Column in Grid I ................................................................. 27

Figure 4.2.12: Condition of Column in Grid J ................................................................ 28
Figure 4.2.13: Condition of Column in Grid K ............................................................... 29
Figure 4.2.14: Condition of Column in Grid L ........................................................... 30
Figure 4.2.15: Condition of Column in Grid La ......................................................... 31
Figure 4.2.16: Condition of Column in Grid Lb ......................................................... 32
Figure 4.2.17: Condition of Column in Grid Lc ......................................................... 33
Figure 4.2.18: Condition of Column in Grid Ld ......................................................... 34
Figure 4.2.19: Condition of Column in Grid M .......................................................... 35
Figure 4.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams......................................................................... 36
Figure 4.3.2: Condition of 1st Floor Beams. .................................................................... 37
Figure 4.3.3: Condition of 2 nd to 4th Floor Beams. .......................................................... 38
Figure 4.3.4: Condition of 5 th Floor Beams. .................................................................... 39
Figure 4.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams. ................................................................ 40
Figure 4.3.6: Condition of Water tank level Beams. ....................................................... 41
Figure 4-7: 1St Floor Slab Deformed Shape for 42 psf Live Load ................................... 42
Figure 4-8: 1st Floor Slab Bottom Reinforcement Requirement in Longitudinal Direction
for 42 psf Live Load (unit-in2/ft.).................................................................................... 42
Figure 4-30: 1St Floor Slab Top Reinforcement Requirement in Longitudinal Direction for
42 psf Live Load (unit-in2/ft.) ......................................................................................... 43
Figure 4-31: 1St Floor Slab Bottom Reinforcement Requirement in Transverse Direction
Figure 4-11: 1St Floor Slab Top Reinforcement Requirement in Transverse Direction for
Figure 5.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan ............................................................................. 44
Figure 5.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model .................................................................... 45
Figure 5.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Built Drawing.............................................. 49
Figure 5.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Model Snapshot. .............................................. 49
Figure 5.2.3: Condition of Column in Grid A ................................................................. 50

Figure 5.2.4: Condition of Column in Grid B ................................................................. 51
Figure 5.2.5: Condition of Column in Grid C ................................................................. 52
Figure 5.2.6: Condition of Column in Grid D ................................................................. 53
Figure 5.2.7: Condition of Column in Grid E.................................................................. 54
Figure 5.2.8: Condition of Column in Grid F .................................................................. 55
Figure 5.2.9: Condition of Column in Grid G ................................................................. 56
Figure 5.2.10: Condition of Column in Grid H ............................................................... 57
Figure 5.2.11: Condition of Column in Grid I ................................................................. 58
Figure 5.2.12: Condition of Column in Grid J ................................................................ 59
Figure 5.2.13: Condition of Column in Grid K ............................................................... 60
Figure 5.2.14: Condition of Column in Grid L ........................................................... 61
Figure 5.2.15: Condition of Column in Grid La ......................................................... 62
Figure 5.2.16: Condition of Column in Grid Lb ......................................................... 63
Figure 5.2.17: Condition of Column in Grid Lc ......................................................... 64
Figure 5.2.18: Condition of Column in Grid Ld ......................................................... 65
Figure 5.2.19: Condition of Column in Grid M .......................................................... 66
Figure 5.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams......................................................................... 67
Figure 5.3.2: Condition of 1st Floor Beams. .................................................................... 68
Figure 5.3.3: Condition of 2 nd to 4th Floor Beams. .......................................................... 69
Figure 5.3.4: Condition of 5 th Floor Beams. .................................................................... 70
Figure 5.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams. ................................................................ 71
Figure 5.3.6: Condition of Water tank level Beams. ....................................................... 72
Figure 5-7: 1St Floor Slab Deformed Shape for 63 psf Live Load ................................... 73
Figure 10.2.3: Condition of Column in Grid A ............................................................... 81
Figure 10.2.4: Condition of Column in Grid B ............................................................... 82
Figure 10.2.5: Condition of Column in Grid C ............................................................... 83
Figure 10.2.6: Condition of Column in Grid D ............................................................... 84
Figure 10.2.7: Condition of Column in Grid E................................................................ 85
Figure 10.2.8: Condition of Column in Grid F ................................................................ 86
Figure 10.2.9: Condition of Column in Grid G ............................................................... 87
Figure 10.2.10: Condition of Column in Grid H ............................................................. 88
Figure 10.2.11: Condition of Column in Grid I ............................................................... 89
Figure 10.2.12: Condition of Column in Grid J .............................................................. 90
Figure 10.2.13: Condition of Column in Grid K ............................................................. 91
Figure 10.2.14: Condition of Column in Grid L ......................................................... 92
Figure 10.2.15: Condition of Column in Grid La ....................................................... 93
Figure 10.2.16: Condition of Column in Grid Lb ....................................................... 94
Figure 10.2.17: Condition of Column in Grid Lc ....................................................... 95
Figure 10.2.18: Condition of Column in Grid Ld ....................................................... 96
Figure 10.2.19: Condition of Column in Grid M ........................................................ 97
List of Tables
Table 1.1.1: Basic information .......................................................................................... 2
Table 4.1.1: Pile Capacity check for 42 psf Live Load ................................................... 14
Table 4.1.2: Punching Shear Check for pile caps considering 42psf Live Load ............. 16
Table 4.4.1: Adequacy Check for Slab for 42 psf Live Load .......................................... 44
Table 5.1.1: Pile Capacity check for 63 psf Live Load ................................................... 45
Table 5.1.2: Punching Shear Check for pile caps considering 63psf Live Load ............. 47
Table 5.4.1: Adequacy Check for Slab for 63 psf Live Load ......................................... 75
Table 10.1.1: Pile Capacity check for 63 psf Live Load ................................................. 77
Table 10.1.2: Punching Shear Check for pile caps considering 63psf Live Load ........... 79
APPENDIX-I: NDT AND DT REPORT
APPENDIX-II: SOIL TEST REPORT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Factory building of SMART JACKET (BD) LIMITED is a 6-storied RCC building.
A team from ALLIANCE conducted visual assessment of the factory building on 4th November,
2013. They recommended to perform Assessment of the building. On this recommendation
SMART JACKET (BD) LIMITED has engaged Sthapona Consultants for performing Detailed
Engineering Assessment along with checking architectural and structural drawing of the
building.
The structural and architectural drawings were verified by Ferro-scanning, dimensions

measurement, plaster removing, foundation explorations etc. There are few changes in as-built
condition with architectural drawings which has been incorporated during DEA.
For Detailed Engineering Assessment one of the key inputs is the concrete strength. Seven cores
from different locations of columns and four cores from different locations of beams have been
collected to test the concrete strength. These cores have been sent and tested in BUET lab by
UTM (universal testing machine) to find its compressive strength. It has been found that brick
chips were used as coarse aggregate. Equivalent concrete strength (As per ACI-562) for column
is 2923 psi and for beam is 2581 psi respectively. BUET Core test result is presented in Annex-I.
Considering NTPA referred loading (42 pound per square feet live load), we analysed the
structure & found that all the piles are adequate in bearing capacity. All pile caps are adequate
in thickness for punching shear. All the RCC columns are OK, except five columns. All the
provided grade beams are adequate. All floor Beams are also adequate.
As per BNBC we have considered 63 pound per square feet live load for analysing this building.
The analysis results show that all the piles are adequate in bearing capacity. All pile caps are
adequate in thickness for punching shear. All RCC columns are adequate, except twenty-one
columns are slightly overstressed columns. Sixteen columns in ground floor, two columns up to
first floor, three columns up to second floor. All the provided grade beams are adequate. All
floor Beams are also adequate.
We recommend to rectify the overstressed member to comply the building with BNBC 2006 as
per the provided rectification design. The production of the building can run by maintaining the
allowable load plan.
Page | 1
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The factory building of SMART JACKET (BD) LIMITED is a 6‐storied RCC building located at Plot no -
11, 12 & 13, Sector - 1/A, Road - 05, CEPZ, Chittagong, Bangladesh. Having Latitude: 22°17'23.08"N
and Longitude: 91°46'20.27"E.
Source: Google Earth
Figure 1.1.1: Location of Project
Table 1.1.1: Basic information
Information Description
Structural System Frame work of the building is composed of R.C. slab, R.C. column,
beam and R.C. piling.
Floor Area Total building area: 155,000 SF (G.F: 26,420 sft; 1st: 26,420 sft;
2nd: 26,420 sft, 3rd: 26,420 sft, 4th: 26,420 sft, Roof: 22,900 sft).
Number of Stories 6‐storied RCC building
Construction Year 2012
Foundation Type Cast in situ pile.
Page | 2
Information Description
Construction materials Concrete with brick chips and steel.
Floor usage Major use of floors area as below: Total Occupant: 4,850;
 Ground Floor: Fabric store, pump room, generator room,
sub-station, child care, security room;
 1st Floor: Sewing section, Cutting Table, Fabric Rack, QC

table.
 2nd Floor: Sewing section, Cutting Table, Fabric Rack,

Packing area, box store.
 3rd Floor: Idle machine, Sewing section, Office room, QC

table, packing area, box store.
 4th Floor: Box store, QC table, Dining, Canteen office.
 5th Floor: Dining area, box store.
1.2 GENERAL OBJECTIVE

Sthapona Consultants was assigned to Prepare Design Report of the factory building of SMART
JACKET (BD) LIMITED The scope of work of the project has been shown below, which includes
recommendation made by The ALLIANCE team,
(i). Ferro-Scanning in Column, Beam and Slab for Rebar Detection

(ii). Validate available structural design drawings
(iii). Verify architectural drawings and
(iv). The Structural Integrity Assessment of the building, which includes the following
items:
 Highlight any variations between as-built and structure design drawings (if
applicable)
 Result of testing of materials
 Results of geotechnical assessment and testing/investigation
 Details of assumptions, loading, inputs and results of computer modelling
 Detail assessment of the performance of all structural members under the seismic
load, earthquake load and gravity load
Page | 3
 Commentary on adequate/inadequacy of elements of the structure and further

action plan
2 DESTRUCTIVE & NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING
2.1 EVALUATION OF CONCRETE STRENGTH FROM CORE TEST

Seven cores from different locations of columns and four cores from different locations of
beams have been collected to test the concrete strength. These cores have been sent and tested
in BUET lab by UTM (universal testing machine) to find its compressive strength. It has been
found that brick chips were used as coarse aggregate. Equivalent concrete strength (As per ACI-
562) for column 2923.5 psi and for beam is 2581.0 psi respectively. Core test result is presented
in Annex-I.
Calculation of Equivalent Concrete Strength as per ACI 562 for Column
So, Concrete Strength for Column is 2923.5 psi.
Calculation of Equivalent Concrete Strength as per ACI 562 for Beam
Page | 4
So, Concrete Strength for Beam is 2581.0 psi.
3 ANALYSIS FOR STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY
3.1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

The structural system of the factory building is a six storied RC frame structure (
Figure 3.1.1).
Figure 3.1.1: Beam Slab System of the Building
The building is classified as Intermediate moment resisting frame. General 3D view of the
building has been presented in Figure 3.1.2.
Page | 5
Figure 3.1.2: 3D View of Analytical Model
3.2 CODES AND PRACTICES

For the present project relevant sections of Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC, 2006)
have been used for analysis. For the reinforced concrete design check, American Concrete
Institute (ACI 318-08) code has been consulted as and when became necessary to complement
the BNBC.
3.3 MATERIAL PROPERTY
The principal material of construction is reinforced concrete. As per investigation and design
drawings, the following material properties has been used:
 Yield strength of steel (Rebar), fy = 72,500 lb/in2
 Compressive strength of concrete of Column, fc' = 2,923.5 lb/in2
 Compressive strength of concrete of Beam, fc' = 2,581.0 lb/in2
 Compressive strength of concrete of Slab, fc' = 2,581.0 lb/in2
 Young's modulus of concrete, Ec = 45,000fc'
The above concrete strength is Equivalent concrete strength found using Core test result and
the strength of steel is based on the test result from BUET Lab.
3.4 LOADS
The loads that may act upon the structure are as follows:
Page | 6
3.4.1 Dead Loads

Dead loads (D) are those gravity load which remain acting on the structure permanently without
any change during the structures normal service life. These are basically the loads coming from
the weight of the different components of the structure. For the sake of convenience in the
analysis, sometimes this kind of loads are divided into two types, namely a) self-weight of the
structure (SW) and b) the weight coming from the non-structural permanent components of the
building (SDEAD). In concrete building the weight of slabs, beams, and columns etc. which form
the main structural system is considered the self-weight (SW). The weights of floor finish, water
proofing layer, partition walls and other non-structural permanent components generally
constitute the rest of the total dead load, i.e. (SDEAD). For the analysis and design checking of
the building, following are the values of dead loads,
 Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 150 pcf

 Unit weight of brickwork = 120 pcf
 Floor finish = 25 psf
3.4.2 Live Load
Live load is the gravity load due to non-permanent objects like machines, furniture, and human.
Analysis has been carried out base on load recommended by BNBC (2006). For checking if
needed reduced live load (42psf) are also used to find present condition of the structure.
3.4.3 Wind Load (W)

Bangladesh is typically a storm prone area where due consideration to the thrust due to storm
must be given in the analysis and design of building and structures. Wind load due to storm is
typically modelled as lateral thrust force causing sway or overturning of the building. Detailed
specifications on wind loading on buildings are outlined in BNBC (2006). The present project is
located in Chittagong, for which the following basic parameters are used in wind load
calculation,
 Basic wind speed, Vb= 260 km/h

 Exposure category = A
 Structure Importance coefficient CI =1.00
3.4.4 Earthquake Load (E)

Proper structural design of any building structure must include loads due to earthquake shaking.
Although there has been no major incident of earthquake hazard in the recent past of
Bangladesh, earthquakes are not uncommon in this area. Scientific geological study of the earth
crust below Bangladesh shows that Bangladesh does fall in moderate to high seismic risk zone.
Statistical evidence from past major and minor earthquake incidents shows that a major
earthquake is overdue in the recent times of geological scale. Therefore, it is necessary to
prepare against any possible earthquake hazard. It should be kept in mind that the objective of
Page | 7
earthquake resistance building design is not to make a strong building which can resist any
damage due to earthquake. Instead, earthquake resistant design basically aims at minimizing
the possible damage and casualty to an acceptable level.
Regarding the earthquake resistant structural design, it essential that the specific design code is
followed. For the analysis and design checking of this building, Equivalent Static Force Method
of BNBC (2006) is followed. The main considerations for calculation of earthquake load are given
below.
 Zone co-efficient, Z = 0.15 (zone 2, As Per BNBC 2006)

 Structure importance co-efficient, I = 1.00 (Standard Occupancy, Table 6.2.23, BNBC
2006)
 Response modification co-efficient, R = 8.0 (IMRF, Table 6.2.24, BNBC)
 Site co-efficient, S3= 1.5 (type 3 soil as suggested in Table 6.2.25, BNBC)
3.5 METHOD OF ANALYSIS

Depending on the type of project, there are several well-established methods among which
Finite Element Method (FEM) is perhaps the most sophisticated and all-encompassing one. For
analysis and design checking of the building, powerful finite element based structural design
software package ETABS v15.2.0 has been employed for analysis. Some aspects of the analysis
process are discussed in the following paragraphs.
A full three dimensional modelling of the structure has been developed using frame and
plate/shell elements. At base level, the columns are assumed to be fixed due to cast in situ pile.
3.6 LOADING AND LOAD COMBINATION
The basic sources of loads are described in earlier section. These loads are applied on the model
in seven basic categories. These are as follows:
 Self-weight of structure (SW).

 Floor finish and partition wall (SDEAD).
 Live load on roof (LL).
 Earthquake load on North-South Direction (Ex).
 Earthquake load on East-West Direction (Ey).
 Wind load on North-South Direction (Wx).
 Wind load on East-West Direction (Wy).
These seven basic load cases are analysed in ETABS v15.2.0. The results are then combined in
accordance with the specifications set forth by BNBC. BNBC specifies a number of combination
options. These are as follows:
For Concrete Structure:
Page | 8
 1.4 D
 1.4 D + 1.7 L
 0.9 D + 1.3 (W or 1.1 E)
 0.75 (1.4 D + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E))
 0.75 (1.4 D + 1.7 L + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E))
 1.4 (D + L + E)
Where D stands for total dead load i.e. D = DL + SDEAD, L stands for live load i.e. L=LL, W stands
for wind load and E stands for earthquake load. When these seven basic load cases are combined
accordingly considering the direction of lateral loads, then according to BNBC 2006, we obtain,
after simplification, the following thirty combination cases:
 Combination Case 1: 1.4 D

 Combination Case 2: 1.4 D + 1.7 L
 Combination Case 3: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.275 Wx
 Combination Case 4: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.275 Wx
 Combination Case 5: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.275 Wy
 Combination Case 6: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.275 Wy
 Combination Case 7: 1.05 D + 1.275 Wx
 Combination Case 8: 1.05 D - 1.275 Wx
 Combination Case 9: 1.05 D + 1.275 Wy
 Combination Case 10: 1.05 D - 1.275 Wy
 Combination Case 11: 0.9 D + 1.3 Wx
 Combination Case 12: 0.9 D - 1.3 Wx
 Combination Case 13: 0.9 D + 1.3 Wy
 Combination Case 14: 0.9 D - 1.3 Wy
 Combination Case 15: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.4025 Ex
 Combination Case 16: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.4025 Ex
 Combination Case 17: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.4025 Ey
 Combination Case 18: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.4025 Ey
 Combination Case 19: 1.05 D + 1.4025 Ex
 Combination Case 20: 1.05 D - 1.4025 Ex
 Combination Case 21: 1.05 D + 1.4025 Ey
 Combination Case 22: 1.05 D - 1.4025 Ey
 Combination Case 23: 0.9 D + 1.43 Ex
 Combination Case 24: 0.9 D - 1.43 Ex
 Combination Case 25: 0.9 D + 1.43 Ey
 Combination Case 26: 0.9 D - 1.43 Ey
 Combination Case 27: 1.4 D + 1.4 L + 1.4 Ex
 Combination Case 28: 1.4 D + 1.4 L - 1.4 Ex
Page | 9
 Combination Case 29: 1.4 D + 1.4 L + 1.4 Ey

 Combination Case 30: 1.4 D + 1.4 L - 1.4 Ey
But in ETABS analysis, we do not calculate combination cases 27, 28, 29 & 30.
For the assessment of garments building we consider the load combination provided by the
Guideline for RMG (November 08, 2013) by NTPA for RC structures. The following load
combination is used for the assessment:
Combination Case 1: 1.2 DL + 1.6LL

Combination Case 2: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL + 1.0Wx
Combination Case 3: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL - 1.0Wx
Combination Case 4: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL + 1.0Wy
Combination Case 5: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL - 1.0Wy
Combination Case 6: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL + 1.0Ex
Combination Case 7: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL - 1.0Ex
Combination Case 8: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL + 1.0Ey
Combination Case 9: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL - 1.0Ey
3.7 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

In any finite element analysis, applying appropriate boundary conditions are important. Without
appropriate boundary conditions the model of building structure may not be stable. On the
other hand, application of excessive restraints may render the structure too stiff resulting in
development of unreasonable stresses. For a structure like this building, it is reasonable to
assume that the bases of columns are fully restrained in all directions.
3.8 APPLICATION OF LOAD AND ANALYSIS

A static analysis is performed using the loadings and combinations of loads (mentioned earlier)
for the factory building. Some pictorial representation of the analysis results is shown in figures
below.
Page | 10
Figure 3.8.1: Applied Floor Finish in Typical Floor (25psf)
Figure 3.8.2: Applied Live Load in Typical Floor (42 psf), As per NTPA
Page | 11
Figure 3.8.3: Deflected Shape of the building
4 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR 42 PSF LIVE LOAD
4.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION

Provided structural drawings of the project shows that cast-in-situ pile foundation had been
used for this project (Figure 4.1.1). As per ALLIANCE guideline, we have checked adequacy of
pile capacity & thickness of pile cap for 42 psf live load. Soil test report prepared by “MRITTIKA
PROKAUSHALI”. Considering concrete strength (2923.5 psi) we found all piles capacity are OK.
All of pile caps are adequate for punching shear.
Page | 12
Figure 4.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan
 Pile Capacity Calculation:
Page | 13
Figure 4.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model
Table 4.1.1: Pile Capacity check for 42 psf Live Load
ULTIMA
FOO TE LIVE REMAR
PROVI ULTIMATE FACTOR
TIN CAPACI DEAD LOAD KS
POIN -DED PILE REACTIO OF
G TY LOAD (kip) (Min
T PILE CAPACITY N(KIP) SAFETY(F
TYP OF PILE (kip) FOR 42 FOS=1.5
NO. PER PILE (Kip) OS)
E GROUP PSF )
(kip)
1 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 295.347 61.28 356.6 4.02 OK
2 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 415.634 116.739 532.4 2.69 OK
3 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 391.308 107.483 498.8 2.87 OK
4 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 355.354 97.315 452.7 3.16 OK
5 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 336.619 97.153 433.8 3.30 OK
6 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 332.538 97.325 429.9 3.33 OK
7 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 332.232 97.457 429.7 3.33 OK
8 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 332.528 97.59 430.1 2.50 OK
9 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 341.457 97.728 439.2 2.45 OK
10 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 346.341 97.791 444.1 2.42 OK
11 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 349.645 98.869 448.5 2.40 OK
12 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 356.092 95.804 451.9 2.38 OK
13 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 322.251 75.713 398.0 2.70 OK
14 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 308.751 69.334 378.1 3.79 OK
15 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 403.504 120.788 524.3 2.73 OK
16 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 369.621 116.347 486.0 2.95 OK
17 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 328.127 73.616 401.7 3.57 OK
18 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 777.392 225.467 1002.9 1.51 OK
19 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 613.204 117.785 731.0 1.96 OK
20 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 451.308 101.205 552.5 2.59 OK
21 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 451.152 100.289 551.4 2.60 OK
22 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 440.945 100.243 541.2 2.65 OK
Page | 14
23 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 427.114 100.105 527.2 2.72 OK

24 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 426.81 99.971 526.8 2.04 OK
25 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 434.289 99.847 534.1 2.01 OK
26 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 433.346 99.529 532.9 2.02 OK
27 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 430.1 101.716 531.8 2.02 OK
28 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 420.325 113.23 533.6 2.01 OK
29 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 349.045 115.989 465.0 2.31 OK
30 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 422.591 144.091 566.7 1.90 OK
31 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 443.735 110.162 553.9 1.94 OK
32 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 438.19 114.057 552.2 1.95 OK
33 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 657.512 256.998 914.5 2.35 OK
34 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 459.55 140.632 600.2 3.58 OK
35 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 431.213 136.56 567.8 3.78 OK
36 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 468.687 136.394 605.1 3.55 OK
37 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 413.796 126.054 539.9 3.98 OK
38 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 418.698 126.038 544.7 3.94 OK
39 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 364.257 112.57 476.8 4.51 OK
40 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 390.764 112.057 502.8 4.27 OK
41 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 392.011 112.867 504.9 4.26 OK
42 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 363.32 111.907 475.2 4.52 OK
43 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 382.653 111.71 494.4 4.35 OK
44 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 371.143 112.511 483.7 4.44 OK
45 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 351.545 111.984 463.5 4.64 OK
46 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 367.382 111.745 479.1 4.48 OK
47 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 361.27 112.542 473.8 4.53 OK
48 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 349.038 111.99 461.0 4.66 OK
49 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 364.631 111.745 476.4 4.51 OK
50 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 360.985 112.535 473.5 4.54 OK
51 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 349.167 111.996 461.2 3.88 OK
52 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 362.801 111.744 474.5 3.77 OK
53 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 360.995 112.528 473.5 3.78 OK
54 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 349.575 112.013 461.6 3.88 OK
55 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 364.457 111.756 476.2 3.76 OK
56 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 364.382 112.531 476.9 3.75 OK
57 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 349.201 111.811 461.0 3.88 OK
58 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 362.447 111.497 473.9 3.78 OK
59 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 360.681 112.338 473.0 3.79 OK
60 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 356.844 114.922 471.8 3.80 OK
61 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 367.058 114.87 481.9 3.72 OK
62 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 365.129 114.712 479.8 3.73 OK
63 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 427.605 128.702 556.3 3.22 OK
64 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 447.112 169.213 616.3 2.91 OK
65 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 399.444 141.933 541.4 3.31 OK
Page | 15
Table 4.1.2: Punching Shear Check for pile caps considering 42psf Live Load
f'C= 2923.5 psi

Live Load 42 psf
Factored Punch DCR
COLU
FZ Load , 42 FDN COLU ing for
Poi FDN, FZ (Live) MN Rem
(Dead), psf LL THICKN MN Shear Punchi
nt Name Kip DIM, ark
Kip (DL*1.2+LL ESS, IN DIM, L Capaci ng, 42
B
*1.6) ty, Kip psf LL
1 PC3 61.28 295.347 452 37 22 22 1400 0.32 OK
2 PC3 116.739 415.634 686 37 22 22 1400 0.49 OK
3 PC3 107.483 391.308 642 37 22 22 1400 0.46 OK
4 PC3 97.315 355.354 582 37 22 22 1400 0.42 OK
5 PC3 97.153 336.619 559 37 22 22 1400 0.40 OK
6 PC3 97.325 332.538 555 37 22 22 1400 0.40 OK
7 PC3 97.457 332.232 555 37 22 22 1400 0.40 OK
8 PC1 97.59 332.528 555 35 22 22 1271 0.44 OK
9 PC1 97.728 341.457 566 35 22 22 1271 0.45 OK
10 PC1 97.791 346.341 572 35 22 22 1271 0.45 OK
11 PC1 98.869 349.645 578 35 22 22 1271 0.45 OK
12 PC1 95.804 356.092 581 35 22 22 1271 0.46 OK
13 PC1 75.713 322.251 508 35 22 22 1271 0.40 OK
14 PC3 69.334 308.751 481 37 22 22 1400 0.34 OK
15 PC3 120.788 403.504 677 37 22 22 1400 0.48 OK
16 PC3 116.347 369.621 630 37 22 22 1400 0.45 OK
17 PC3 73.616 328.127 512 37 22 22 1400 0.37 OK
18 PC3 225.467 777.392 1294 37 22 22 1400 0.92 OK
19 PC3 117.785 613.204 924 37 22 22 1400 0.66 OK
20 PC3 101.205 451.308 703 37 22 22 1400 0.50 OK
21 PC3 100.289 451.152 702 37 22 22 1400 0.50 OK
22 PC3 100.243 440.945 690 37 22 22 1400 0.49 OK
23 PC3 100.105 427.114 673 37 22 22 1400 0.48 OK
24 PC1 99.971 426.81 672 35 22 22 1271 0.53 OK
25 PC1 99.847 434.289 681 35 22 22 1271 0.54 OK
26 PC1 99.529 433.346 679 35 22 22 1271 0.53 OK
27 PC1 101.716 430.1 679 35 22 22 1271 0.53 OK
28 PC1 113.23 420.325 686 35 22 22 1271 0.54 OK
29 PC1 115.989 349.045 604 35 22 22 1271 0.48 OK
30 PC1 144.091 422.591 738 35 22 22 1271 0.58 OK
31 PC1 110.162 443.735 709 35 22 22 1271 0.56 OK
32 PC1 114.057 438.19 708 35 22 22 1271 0.56 OK
33 PC4 256.998 657.512 1200 45 24 24 2038 0.59 OK
34 PC4 140.632 459.55 776 45 24 24 2038 0.38 OK
35 PC4 136.56 431.213 736 45 24 24 2038 0.36 OK
36 PC4 136.394 468.687 781 45 24 24 2038 0.38 OK
Page | 16
37 PC4 126.054 413.796 698 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK

38 PC4 126.038 418.698 704 45 24 24 2038 0.35 OK
39 PC4 112.57 364.257 617 45 24 24 2038 0.30 OK
40 PC4 112.057 390.764 648 45 24 24 2038 0.32 OK
41 PC4 112.867 392.011 651 45 24 24 2038 0.32 OK
42 PC4 111.907 363.32 615 45 24 24 2038 0.30 OK
43 PC4 111.71 382.653 638 45 24 24 2038 0.31 OK
44 PC4 112.511 371.143 625 45 24 24 2038 0.31 OK
45 PC4 111.984 351.545 601 45 24 24 2038 0.29 OK
46 PC4 111.745 367.382 620 45 24 24 2038 0.30 OK
47 PC4 112.542 361.27 614 45 24 24 2038 0.30 OK
48 PC4 111.99 349.038 598 45 24 24 2038 0.29 OK
49 PC4 111.745 364.631 616 45 24 24 2038 0.30 OK
50 PC4 112.535 360.985 613 45 24 24 2038 0.30 OK
51 PC2 111.996 349.167 598 37 24 24 1450 0.41 OK
52 PC2 111.744 362.801 614 37 24 24 1450 0.42 OK
53 PC2 112.528 360.995 613 37 24 24 1450 0.42 OK
54 PC2 112.013 349.575 599 37 24 24 1450 0.41 OK
55 PC2 111.756 364.457 616 37 24 24 1450 0.42 OK
56 PC2 112.531 364.382 617 37 24 24 1450 0.43 OK
57 PC2 111.811 349.201 598 37 24 24 1450 0.41 OK
58 PC2 111.497 362.447 613 37 24 24 1450 0.42 OK
59 PC2 112.338 360.681 613 37 24 24 1450 0.42 OK
60 PC2 114.922 356.844 612 37 24 24 1450 0.42 OK
61 PC2 114.87 367.058 624 37 24 24 1450 0.43 OK
62 PC2 114.712 365.129 622 37 24 24 1450 0.43 OK
63 PC2 128.702 427.605 719 37 24 24 1450 0.50 OK
64 PC2 169.213 447.112 807 37 24 24 1450 0.56 OK
65 PC2 141.933 399.444 706 37 24 24 1450 0.49 OK
4.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN

Column layout plan from model snap shot is shown in Figure 4.2.2. Results has been shown
based on model grid. Assessment of columns (P-M-M Interaction Ratio) considering 42 psf live
load. According to standard practice, column with P-M-M value greater than 1.0 is considered
as inadequate.
Page | 17
Figure 4.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Built Drawing.
RCC Column layout plan is shown in Figure 4.2.1 from Design Drawing. Figure 4.2.3 to Figure
4.2.8 shows the failure of column up to the particular level.
Figure 4.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Model Snapshot.
Page | 18
Figure 4.2.3: Condition of Column in Grid A

(Sections having P-M-M ratio more than 1 are Inadequate)
Page | 19
Figure 4.2.4: Condition of Column in Grid B

(Sections having P-M-M ratio less than 1 are Adequate)
Page | 20
Figure 4.2.5: Condition of Column in Grid C

Page | 21
Figure 4.2.6: Condition of Column in Grid D

Page | 22
Figure 4.2.7: Condition of Column in Grid E

Page | 23
Figure 4.2.8: Condition of Column in Grid F

Page | 24
Figure 4.2.9: Condition of Column in Grid G

Page | 25
Figure 4.2.10: Condition of Column in Grid H

Page | 26
Figure 4.2.11: Condition of Column in Grid I

Page | 27
Figure 4.2.12: Condition of Column in Grid J

Page | 28
Figure 4.2.13: Condition of Column in Grid K

Page | 29
Figure 4.2.14: Condition of Column in Grid L

Page | 30
Figure 4.2.15: Condition of Column in Grid La

Page | 31
Figure 4.2.16: Condition of Column in Grid Lb

Page | 32
Figure 4.2.17: Condition of Column in Grid Lc

Page | 33
Figure 4.2.18: Condition of Column in Grid Ld

Page | 34
Figure 4.2.19: Condition of Column in Grid M

4.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF BEAMS
4.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam

Figure 4.3.1 shows the condition of grade beam under lateral loading. All grade beams are
inadequate loading according to BNBC code.
Page | 35
Figure 4.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams.

Provided Reinf. At Required
Beam Id. In Provided Reinf. Required Reinf.
Middle-Bottom Reinf.
Drawing At Top-Edge (in2) (in2)
(in2) (in2)
GB 1.55 As Shown 1.24 As Shown
Page | 36
4.3.2 Evaluation of Roof Beam

Following figures represent the condition of beams according to 42 psf live loading. Red coloured
beams are overstressed due to excessive shear & torsion; other beams are adequate in size.
Represented Figures are showing required reinforcements also. Required reinforcement >
Provided Reinforcement denotes inadequacy.
Figure 4.3.2: Condition of 1st Floor Beams.
Page | 37
Provided
Provided Reinf.
Beam Id. In Reinf. At Required Required
At Middle-
Drawing Top-Edge Reinf. (in2) Reinf. (in2)
Bottom(in2)
(in2)
FB-1 4.64 As Shown 1.92 As Shown
Figure 4.3.3: Condition of 2nd to 4th Floor Beams.
Page | 38
Provided
Provided Reinf.
At Middle-
Bottom(in2)
(in2)
Figure 4.3.4: Condition of 5th Floor Beams.
Page | 39
Provided
Provided Reinf.
At Middle-
Bottom(in2)
(in2)
Figure 4.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams.
Page | 40
Provided
Provided Reinf.
At Middle-
Bottom(in2)
(in2)
Figure 4.3.6: Condition of Water tank level Beams.
Page | 41
Provided
Provided Reinf.
At Middle-
Bottom(in2)
(in2)
4.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB

Following figures represent the condition of slabs according to 42 psf live loading. Deformed
view of 1st floor slab for applied loading combinations are shown in to Figure 4-7. Figure 4-8 to
Figure 4-11 shows the reinforcement required by the existing 1 st floor slab for 42 psf live load.
Finally, Table 4.4.1 shows the comparison between provided and the required reinforcement for
slabs.
Figure 4-7: 1St Floor Slab Deformed Shape for 42 psf Live Load
for 42 psf Live Load (unit-in2/ft.)
Page | 42
42 psf Live Load (unit-in2/ft.)
Page | 43
Table 4.4.1: Adequacy Check for Slab for 42 psf Live Load
Provided Top Maximum
Maximum Provided Reinf. At
Slab Reinf. At Required
Required Middle-Bottom
Direction Column Strip Reinf.
Reinf. (in2/ft.) (in2/ft.)
(in2/ft.) (in2/ft.)
Longitudinal 0.630 As Shown 0.42 As Shown
Transverse 0.954 As Shown 0.42 As Shown
5 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR 63 PSF LIVE LOAD

used for this project (Figure 4.1.1). As per BNBC guideline, we have checked adequacy of pile
capacity & thickness of pile cap for 63 psf live load. Soil test report prepared by “MRITTIKA
Figure 5.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan
Page | 44
Figure 5.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model
ULTIMAT ULTIMATE LIVE REMAR

P PROVI FACTOR
FOOTI E PILE CAPACITY DEAD LOAD KS
OI DED REACTION( OF
NG CAPACIT OF PILE LOAD (kip) (Min
N PILE KIP) SAFETY(F
TYPE Y PER GROUP (kip) FOR 63 FOS=1.
T NO. OS)
PILE (Kip) (kip) PSF 5)
1 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 295.347 87.755 383.1 3.74 OK
2 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 415.634 167.062 582.7 2.46 OK
3 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 391.308 153.18 544.5 2.63 OK
4 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 355.354 137.707 493.1 2.91 OK
5 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 336.619 137.645 474.3 3.02 OK
6 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 332.538 137.83 470.4 3.05 OK
7 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 332.232 137.98 470.2 3.05 OK
8 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 332.528 138.13 470.7 2.28 OK
9 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 341.457 138.283 479.7 2.24 OK
10 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 346.341 138.356 484.7 2.22 OK
11 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 349.645 139.675 489.3 2.20 OK
12 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 356.092 135.192 491.3 2.19 OK
13 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 322.251 108.425 430.7 2.49 OK
14 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 308.751 99.44 408.2 3.51 OK
15 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 403.504 138.697 542.2 2.64 OK
16 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 369.621 133.825 503.4 2.85 OK
17 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 328.127 104.203 432.3 3.31 OK
18 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 777.392 262.352 1039.7 1.50 OK
19 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 613.204 164.131 777.3 1.84 OK
20 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 451.308 143.267 594.6 2.41 OK
21 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 451.152 142.235 593.4 2.41 OK
22 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 440.945 142.181 583.1 2.46 OK
23 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 427.114 142.028 569.1 2.52 OK
24 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 426.81 141.877 568.7 1.89 OK
25 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 434.289 141.735 576.0 1.87 OK
Page | 45
26 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 433.346 141.395 574.7 1.87 OK

27 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 430.1 144.031 574.1 1.87 OK
28 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 420.325 138.885 559.2 1.92 OK
29 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 349.045 151.877 500.9 2.14 OK
30 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 422.591 178.329 600.9 1.79 OK
31 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 443.735 138.914 582.6 1.84 OK
32 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 438.19 143.099 581.3 1.85 OK
33 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 657.512 303.679 961.2 2.24 OK
34 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 459.55 199.493 659.0 3.26 OK
35 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 431.213 195.494 626.7 3.43 OK
36 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 468.687 191.251 659.9 3.26 OK
37 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 413.796 178.783 592.6 3.63 OK
38 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 418.698 179.139 597.8 3.59 OK
39 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 364.257 159.371 523.6 4.10 OK
40 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 390.764 158.68 549.4 3.91 OK
41 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 392.011 159.794 551.8 3.89 OK
42 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 363.32 158.681 522.0 4.12 OK
43 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 382.653 158.417 541.1 3.97 OK
44 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 371.143 159.533 530.7 4.05 OK
45 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 351.545 158.766 510.3 4.21 OK
46 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 367.382 158.448 525.8 4.09 OK
47 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 361.27 159.559 520.8 4.13 OK
48 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 349.038 158.774 507.8 4.23 OK
49 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 364.631 158.449 523.1 4.11 OK
50 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 360.985 159.553 520.5 4.13 OK
51 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 349.167 158.781 507.9 3.53 OK
52 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 362.801 158.448 521.2 3.44 OK
53 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 360.995 159.545 520.5 3.44 OK
54 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 349.575 158.798 508.4 3.52 OK
55 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 364.457 158.459 522.9 3.42 OK
56 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 364.382 159.546 523.9 3.42 OK
57 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 349.201 158.588 507.8 3.53 OK
58 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 362.447 158.197 520.6 3.44 OK
59 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 360.681 159.344 520.0 3.44 OK
60 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 356.844 162.267 519.1 3.45 OK
61 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 367.058 161.839 528.9 3.39 OK
62 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 365.129 161.991 527.1 3.40 OK
63 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 427.605 160.2 587.8 3.05 OK
64 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 447.112 211.41 658.5 2.72 OK
65 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 399.444 186.013 585.5 3.06 OK
Page | 46
f'C= 2923.5 psi

Live Load 63 psf
Factored Punch DCR
COLU
B
1 PC3 87.755 295.347 495 37 22 22 1400 0.35 OK
2 PC3 167.062 415.634 766 37 22 22 1400 0.55 OK
3 PC3 153.18 391.308 715 37 22 22 1400 0.51 OK
4 PC3 137.707 355.354 647 37 22 22 1400 0.46 OK
5 PC3 137.645 336.619 624 37 22 22 1400 0.45 OK
6 PC3 137.83 332.538 620 37 22 22 1400 0.44 OK
7 PC3 137.98 332.232 619 37 22 22 1400 0.44 OK
8 PC1 138.13 332.528 620 35 22 22 1271 0.49 OK
9 PC1 138.283 341.457 631 35 22 22 1271 0.50 OK
10 PC1 138.356 346.341 637 35 22 22 1271 0.50 OK
11 PC1 139.675 349.645 643 35 22 22 1271 0.51 OK
12 PC1 135.192 356.092 644 35 22 22 1271 0.51 OK
13 PC1 108.425 322.251 560 35 22 22 1271 0.44 OK
14 PC3 99.44 308.751 530 37 22 22 1400 0.38 OK
15 PC3 138.697 403.504 706 37 22 22 1400 0.50 OK
16 PC3 133.825 369.621 658 37 22 22 1400 0.47 OK
17 PC3 104.203 328.127 560 37 22 22 1400 0.40 OK
18 PC3 262.352 777.392 1353 37 22 22 1400 0.97 OK
19 PC3 164.131 613.204 998 37 22 22 1400 0.71 OK
20 PC3 143.267 451.308 771 37 22 22 1400 0.55 OK
21 PC3 142.235 451.152 769 37 22 22 1400 0.55 OK
22 PC3 142.181 440.945 757 37 22 22 1400 0.54 OK
23 PC3 142.028 427.114 740 37 22 22 1400 0.53 OK
24 PC1 141.877 426.81 739 35 22 22 1271 0.58 OK
25 PC1 141.735 434.289 748 35 22 22 1271 0.59 OK
26 PC1 141.395 433.346 746 35 22 22 1271 0.59 OK
27 PC1 144.031 430.1 747 35 22 22 1271 0.59 OK
28 PC1 138.885 420.325 727 35 22 22 1271 0.57 OK
29 PC1 151.877 349.045 662 35 22 22 1271 0.52 OK
30 PC1 178.329 422.591 792 35 22 22 1271 0.62 OK
31 PC1 138.914 443.735 755 35 22 22 1271 0.59 OK
32 PC1 143.099 438.19 755 35 22 22 1271 0.59 OK
33 PC4 303.679 657.512 1275 45 24 24 2038 0.63 OK
34 PC4 199.493 459.55 871 45 24 24 2038 0.43 OK
35 PC4 195.494 431.213 830 45 24 24 2038 0.41 OK
36 PC4 191.251 468.687 868 45 24 24 2038 0.43 OK
Page | 47
37 PC4 178.783 413.796 783 45 24 24 2038 0.38 OK

38 PC4 179.139 418.698 789 45 24 24 2038 0.39 OK
39 PC4 159.371 364.257 692 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
40 PC4 158.68 390.764 723 45 24 24 2038 0.35 OK
41 PC4 159.794 392.011 726 45 24 24 2038 0.36 OK
42 PC4 158.681 363.32 690 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
43 PC4 158.417 382.653 713 45 24 24 2038 0.35 OK
44 PC4 159.533 371.143 701 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
45 PC4 158.766 351.545 676 45 24 24 2038 0.33 OK
46 PC4 158.448 367.382 694 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
47 PC4 159.559 361.27 689 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
48 PC4 158.774 349.038 673 45 24 24 2038 0.33 OK
49 PC4 158.449 364.631 691 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
50 PC4 159.553 360.985 688 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
51 PC2 158.781 349.167 673 37 24 24 1450 0.46 OK
52 PC2 158.448 362.801 689 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
53 PC2 159.545 360.995 688 37 24 24 1450 0.47 OK
54 PC2 158.798 349.575 674 37 24 24 1450 0.46 OK
55 PC2 158.459 364.457 691 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
56 PC2 159.546 364.382 693 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
57 PC2 158.588 349.201 673 37 24 24 1450 0.46 OK
58 PC2 158.197 362.447 688 37 24 24 1450 0.47 OK
59 PC2 159.344 360.681 688 37 24 24 1450 0.47 OK
60 PC2 162.267 356.844 688 37 24 24 1450 0.47 OK
61 PC2 161.839 367.058 699 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
62 PC2 161.991 365.129 697 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
63 PC2 160.2 427.605 769 37 24 24 1450 0.53 OK
64 PC2 211.41 447.112 875 37 24 24 1450 0.60 OK
65 PC2 186.013 399.444 777 37 24 24 1450 0.54 OK

as inadequate.
Page | 48
Figure 5.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Built Drawing.
Figure 5.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Model Snapshot.
Page | 49

Page | 50

Page | 51

Page | 52

Page | 53

Page | 54

Page | 55

Page | 56

Page | 57

Page | 58

Page | 59

Page | 60

Page | 61

Page | 62

Page | 63

Page | 64

Page | 65

5.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF BEAMS
5.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam

Figure 4.3.1 shows the condition of grade beam under lateral loading. All grade beams are
inadequate loading according to BNBC code.
Page | 66
Figure 5.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams.
Page | 67
Provided Reinf. At Required

Beam Id. In Provided Reinf. Required Reinf.
Middle-Bottom Reinf.
Drawing At Top-Edge (in2) (in2)
(in2) (in2)
GB 1.55 As Shown 1.24 As Shown
5.3.2 Evaluation of Roof Beam

Following figures represent the condition of beams according to 42 psf live loading. Red coloured
beams are overstressed due to excessive shear & torsion; other beams are adequate in size.
Represented Figures are showing required reinforcements also. Required reinforcement >
Provided Reinforcement denotes inadequacy.
Figure 5.3.2: Condition of 1st Floor Beams.
Page | 68
Provided
Provided Reinf.
At Middle-
Bottom(in2)
(in2)
Figure 5.3.3: Condition of 2nd to 4th Floor Beams.
Page | 69
Provided
Provided Reinf.
At Middle-
Bottom(in2)
(in2)
Figure 5.3.4: Condition of 5th Floor Beams.
Page | 70
Provided
Provided Reinf.
At Middle-
Bottom(in2)
(in2)
Figure 5.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams.
Page | 71
Provided
Provided Reinf.
At Middle-
Bottom(in2)
(in2)
Figure 5.3.6: Condition of Water tank level Beams.
Page | 72
5.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB

Following figures represent the condition of slabs according to 63 psf live loading. Deformed
view of 1st floor slab for applied loading combinations are shown in Figure 5-7. Figure 5-8 to
Figure 5-11 shows the reinforcement required by the existing 1 st floor slab for 63 psf live load.
Finally, Table 5.4.1 shows the comparison between provided and the required reinforcement for
slabs.
Figure 5-7: 1St Floor Slab Deformed Shape for 63 psf Live Load
Page | 73
Page | 74
Table 5.4.1: Adequacy Check for Slab for 63 psf Live Load
Provided Top Maximum
Maximum Provided Reinf. At
Slab Reinf. At Required
Required Middle-Bottom
Direction Column Strip Reinf.
Reinf. (in2/ft.) (in2/ft.)
(in2/ft.) (in2/ft.)
Longitudinal 0.630 As Shown 0.42 As Shown
Transverse 0.954 As Shown 0.42 As Shown
6 CHECK FOR DRIFT

Occupancy Category, OC III = 0.015 (I,II=0.025,III=0.020,IV=0.015)
Deflection Amplification Factor, C d = 4.5 (SMRF=5.5, IMRF=4.5, OMRF=2.5)

Response Modification Factor,R = 8 (SMRF=12, IMRF=8, OMRF=5rc/6stl)
Height = 86.17 ft
Drift(Displacement) Check
Min. Allowable
Governing Lateral Load ∆1 ∆2 ∆=∆1~∆2 (0.03hsx/R)<0.004hsx(BNBC) OC*hsx(ASCE)/Cd Remark
Drift
EQx 0 2.83 2.83 3.87765 3.45 3.45 OK
EQy 0 1.63 1.63 3.87765 3.45 3.45 OK
Page | 75
7 CONCLUSION
According to BNBC loading condition (63psf Live Load)-
 All the piles are adequate in capacity. All pile caps are adequate in thickness for punching
shear.
 All the RCC columns are OK, except 21 columns. Sixteen columns up to Ground floor,
two columns up to first floor, three columns up to second floor.
 All the provided grade beams are adequate.
 Floor Beams are also adequate.
According to NTPA loading condition (42 psf Live Load)-

 All the piles and pile caps are adequate.
 All the RCC columns are OK, except 5 columns.
 All the provided grade beams are adequate.
 Floor Beams are also adequate.
8 RECOMMENDATION
 We recommend to rectify the overstressed member to comply the building with BNBC
2006 as per the provided rectification design. Until rectification, factory can continue its
operation.
Page | 76
9 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AFTER

RETROFITTING

used for this project (Figure 4.1.1). As per BNBC guideline, we have checked adequacy of pile
capacity & thickness of pile cap for 63 psf live load. Soil test report prepared by “MRITTIKA
ULTIMAT
ULTIMATE E LIVE REMAR
PROVI FACTOR
FOOTI PILE CAPACIT DEAD LOAD KS
PO DED REACTIO OF
NG CAPACITY Y LOAD (kip) (Min
INT PILE N(KIP) SAFETY(F
TYPE PER PILE OF PILE (kip) FOR 63 FOS=1.5
NO. OS)
(Kip) GROUP PSF )
(kip)
1 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 293.978 87.195 381.2 3.76 OK
2 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 433.816 172.383 606.2 2.36 OK
3 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 389.823 152.566 542.4 2.64 OK
4 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 357.028 138.385 495.4 2.89 OK
5 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 337.856 138.122 476.0 3.01 OK
6 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 333.671 138.262 471.9 3.04 OK
7 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 333.249 138.358 471.6 3.04 OK
8 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 333.428 138.456 471.9 2.28 OK
9 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 342.237 138.556 480.8 2.23 OK
10 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 347.008 138.575 485.6 2.21 OK
11 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 350.195 139.844 490.0 2.19 OK
12 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 356.754 135.346 492.1 2.18 OK
13 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 323.525 109.036 432.6 2.48 OK
14 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 309.328 99.727 409.1 3.50 OK
15 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 430.078 134.066 564.1 2.54 OK
16 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 414.46 138.95 553.4 2.59 OK
17 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 318.455 100.309 418.8 3.42 OK
18 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 828.903 271.787 1100.7 1.50 OK
19 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 626.587 165.118 791.7 1.81 OK
20 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 456.274 143.308 599.6 2.39 OK
21 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 458.793 143.15 601.9 2.38 OK
22 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 448.249 143.053 591.3 2.42 OK
23 PC3 4 358.114 1432.46 434.325 142.954 577.3 2.48 OK
24 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 434.168 142.852 577.0 1.86 OK
25 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 441.89 142.758 584.6 1.84 OK
26 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 441.257 142.495 583.8 1.84 OK
Page | 77
27 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 437.271 144.971 582.2 1.85 OK

28 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 426.512 139.793 566.3 1.90 OK
29 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 345.244 150.144 495.4 2.17 OK
30 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 433.97 181.05 615.0 1.75 OK
31 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 451.753 138.832 590.6 1.82 OK
32 PC1 3 358.114 1074.34 443.337 142.097 585.4 1.84 OK
33 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 668.963 303.736 972.7 2.21 OK
34 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 450.56 195.207 645.8 3.33 OK
35 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 427.327 193.649 621.0 3.46 OK
36 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 455.279 185.93 641.2 3.35 OK
37 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 414.473 178.98 593.5 3.62 OK
38 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 418.667 179.165 597.8 3.59 OK
39 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 361.424 158.068 519.5 4.14 OK
40 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 391.222 158.907 550.1 3.91 OK
41 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 392.001 159.789 551.8 3.89 OK
42 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 360.181 157.263 517.4 4.15 OK
43 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 382.998 158.568 541.6 3.97 OK
44 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 371.077 159.49 530.6 4.05 OK
45 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 348.481 157.34 505.8 4.25 OK
46 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 367.729 158.603 526.3 4.08 OK
47 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 361.218 159.521 520.7 4.13 OK
48 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 346.121 157.351 503.5 4.27 OK
49 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 364.961 158.603 523.6 4.10 OK
50 PC4 6 358.114 2148.68 360.934 159.517 520.5 4.13 OK
51 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 346.249 157.359 503.6 3.56 OK
52 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 363.13 158.603 521.7 3.43 OK
53 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 360.951 159.512 520.5 3.44 OK
54 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 346.567 157.371 503.9 3.55 OK
55 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 364.782 158.608 523.4 3.42 OK
56 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 364.343 159.514 523.9 3.42 OK
57 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 346.443 157.277 503.7 3.55 OK
58 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 363.011 158.468 521.5 3.43 OK
59 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 360.693 159.34 520.0 3.44 OK
60 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 350.965 159.517 510.5 3.51 OK
61 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 364.874 160.676 525.6 3.41 OK
62 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 364.899 161.865 526.8 3.40 OK
63 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 432.3 160.25 592.6 3.02 OK
64 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 457.916 214.611 672.5 2.66 OK
65 PC2 5 358.114 1790.57 395.519 183.853 579.4 3.09 OK
Page | 78
f'C= 2923.5 psi

Live Load 63 psf
Factored Punch DCR
COLU
B
1 PC3 87.195 293.978 492 37 22 22 1400 0.35 OK
2 PC3 172.383 433.816 796 43 32 32 2118 0.38 OK
3 PC3 152.566 389.823 712 37 22 22 1400 0.51 OK
4 PC3 138.385 357.028 650 37 22 22 1400 0.46 OK
5 PC3 138.122 337.856 626 37 22 22 1400 0.45 OK
6 PC3 138.262 333.671 622 37 22 22 1400 0.44 OK
7 PC3 138.358 333.249 621 37 22 22 1400 0.44 OK
8 PC1 138.456 333.428 622 35 22 22 1271 0.49 OK
9 PC1 138.556 342.237 632 35 22 22 1271 0.50 OK
10 PC1 138.575 347.008 638 35 22 22 1271 0.50 OK
11 PC1 139.844 350.195 644 35 22 22 1271 0.51 OK
12 PC1 135.346 356.754 645 35 22 22 1271 0.51 OK
13 PC1 109.036 323.525 563 35 22 22 1271 0.44 OK
14 PC3 99.727 309.328 531 37 22 22 1400 0.38 OK
15 PC3 134.066 430.078 731 43 32 32 2118 0.34 OK
16 PC3 138.95 414.46 720 43 32 32 2118 0.34 OK
17 PC3 100.309 318.455 543 37 22 22 1400 0.39 OK
18 PC3 271.787 828.903 1430 43 32 32 2118 0.68 OK
19 PC3 165.118 626.587 1016 43 32 32 2118 0.48 OK
20 PC3 143.308 456.274 777 43 32 32 2118 0.37 OK
21 PC3 143.15 458.793 780 43 32 32 2118 0.37 OK
22 PC3 143.053 448.249 767 43 32 32 2118 0.36 OK
23 PC3 142.954 434.325 750 43 32 32 2118 0.35 OK
24 PC1 142.852 434.168 750 41 32 32 1956 0.38 OK
25 PC1 142.758 441.89 759 41 32 32 1956 0.39 OK
26 PC1 142.495 441.257 758 41 32 32 1956 0.39 OK
27 PC1 144.971 437.271 757 41 32 32 1956 0.39 OK
28 PC1 139.793 426.512 735 41 32 32 1956 0.38 OK
29 PC1 150.144 345.244 655 35 22 22 1271 0.52 OK
30 PC1 181.05 433.97 810 41 32 32 1956 0.41 OK
31 PC1 138.832 451.753 764 41 32 32 1956 0.39 OK
32 PC1 142.097 443.337 759 41 32 32 1956 0.39 OK
33 PC4 303.736 668.963 1289 51 32 32 2824 0.46 OK
34 PC4 195.207 450.56 853 45 24 24 2038 0.42 OK
35 PC4 193.649 427.327 823 45 24 24 2038 0.40 OK
36 PC4 185.93 455.279 844 45 24 24 2038 0.41 OK
Page | 79
37 PC4 178.98 414.473 784 45 24 24 2038 0.38 OK

38 PC4 179.165 418.667 789 45 24 24 2038 0.39 OK
39 PC4 158.068 361.424 687 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
40 PC4 158.907 391.222 724 45 24 24 2038 0.36 OK
41 PC4 159.789 392.001 726 45 24 24 2038 0.36 OK
42 PC4 157.263 360.181 684 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
43 PC4 158.568 382.998 713 45 24 24 2038 0.35 OK
44 PC4 159.49 371.077 700 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
45 PC4 157.34 348.481 670 45 24 24 2038 0.33 OK
46 PC4 158.603 367.729 695 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
47 PC4 159.521 361.218 689 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
48 PC4 157.351 346.121 667 45 24 24 2038 0.33 OK
49 PC4 158.603 364.961 692 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
50 PC4 159.517 360.934 688 45 24 24 2038 0.34 OK
51 PC2 157.359 346.249 667 37 24 24 1450 0.46 OK
52 PC2 158.603 363.13 690 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
53 PC2 159.512 360.951 688 37 24 24 1450 0.47 OK
54 PC2 157.371 346.567 668 37 24 24 1450 0.46 OK
55 PC2 158.608 364.782 692 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
56 PC2 159.514 364.343 692 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
57 PC2 157.277 346.443 667 37 24 24 1450 0.46 OK
58 PC2 158.468 363.011 689 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
59 PC2 159.34 360.693 688 37 24 24 1450 0.47 OK
60 PC2 159.517 350.965 676 37 24 24 1450 0.47 OK
61 PC2 160.676 364.874 695 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
62 PC2 161.865 364.899 697 37 24 24 1450 0.48 OK
63 PC2 160.25 432.3 775 43 34 34 2177 0.36 OK
64 PC2 214.611 457.916 893 43 34 34 2177 0.41 OK
65 PC2 183.853 395.519 769 37 24 24 1450 0.53 OK

as inadequate.
Page | 80

Page | 81

Page | 82

Page | 83

Page | 84

Page | 85

Page | 86

Page | 87

Page | 88

Page | 89

Page | 90

Page | 91

Page | 92

Page | 93

Page | 94

Page | 95

Page | 96

10 DISCLAIMER
The assessment engineer made the above observations & recommendations from Core test,
NDT results & mathematical modelling of the building. We applied our best engineering
judgments. We do not bear responsibility for any deviation from the predicted behaviour of the
structure caused by uncertainties of performance or calamities.
Page | 97
ANNEX-I
NON DESTRUCTIVE & DESTRUCTIVE TEST RESULTS

Table of Contents
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS (NDT & DT) .............................................1
2 REBAR SCAN USING FERRO-SCANNER .............................................................................2
2.1 FERRO-SCAN LOCATIONS: ...................................................................................................... 3
2.2 SOME PHOTOGRAPHS OF SCANNING IN COLUMNS, BEAM & SLAB: ...................... 3
2.3 FINDINGS BY DETAILED FERRO SCANNING IN COLUMNS, BEAM AND SLAB: ....... 4
3 REBAR CHECK BY REMOVING CONCRETE COVER .......................................................7
3.1 REBAR EXPOSAL LOCATIONS:................................................................................................ 8
3.2 FIELD PHOTOS OF REBAR CHECK: ........................................................................................ 8
4 CONCRETE CORE PULLOUT ..................................................................................................9
4.1 LOCATIONS OF CORE CUTTING: ........................................................................................ 10
4.2 CONCRETE TEST REPORT ............................................................................................... 13
5 REBAR SAMPLE COLLECTION ........................................................................................... 16
5.1 FIELD PHOTOS OF REBAR CUTTING:.......................................................................... 17
5.2 REBAR TEST REPORT: ....................................................................................................... 17
6 FOUNDATION EXPLORATION ........................................................................................... 18
6.1 LOCATION OF FOUNDATION EXPLORATION: ........................................................ 19
6.2 FIELD PHOTOS OF FOUNDATION EXPLORATION: ............................................... 19
SMART JACKET (BD) LTD. DT & NDT TEST
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS (NDT & DT)

 We have inspected the building visually at 26thMarch, 2016 for first time. The building is
a six storied RCC beam-column frame structure. We have performed NDT & DT tests in
columns, beam and slab in several times in March.
 We have performed detailed rebar scanning using Ferro-Scan at Eight (8) locations to
find the reinforcement used in structural members. Among the eight, threescans were
done for first floor column, one scan was done for third floor column, two scan was done
for fourth floor column, one for first floor slab and one for fourth floor slab. Also a lot of
quick scan were performed to verify the reinforcement in columns, beams and slab.
 We have checked rebar no. and diameter of columns by removing concrete cover.
 We have determined concrete strength by cutting Core (Destructive) at Eleven (11)

locations in column, beam and slab. Among these,threecores have been taken from
ground floor column, four from first floor column, and four from first floor beam. After
cutting the Core, we have tested it by Universal Testing Machine at BUET lab. We found
that brick chips were used for concreting of beams and columns. We found the concrete
strength is on a range from 2630psito4560 psi for columnsand 1410 psi to 3300 psi for
beams. Calculated average concrete strength of column is 3637 psi and 2467 psi of
beam. However, considering the Guide line of ACI 562, the Equivalent Concrete
strength is 2923.5 psi for column and 2581 psi for beam.
 We have checked the footing size, thickness and number & diameter of rebar by
foundation exploration in three locations.
STHAPONACONSULTANTS Page | 1
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
2 REBAR SCAN USING FERRO-SCANNER
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
2.1 FERRO-SCAN LOCATIONS:
Figure 2-1: Locations of detailed Ferro-scan
2.2 Some Photographs of Scanning in Columns, Beam & Slab:
Figure 2-2: Scanning Coln for main bar. Figure 2-3:Scanning Coln for Tie bar.
Figure 2-4: Scanning beam. Figure 2-5: Scanning slab.
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
2.3 Findings by Detailed Ferro Scanning in Columns, Beam and Slab:

Sl. Sample Member Reinforcement
Location Remarks
No Id Type Details
Along 20" face:
Main Reinforcement: 06-Ø20mm
Ground Column, C1 Tie Bar: Ø10 mm @ 5" c/c
01 D-1,2
Floor (20" X 20") Along 20" face:
Tie Bar: Ø10 mm @ 6" c/c
Scanning Images from Ferro-Scanner
Along 20" face Along 20" face

Location Remarks
No Id Type Details
Along 22" face:
02 D-3,4
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]

Location Remarks
No Id Type Details
Along 22" face:
Ground
Column, C2 Tie Bar: Ø10 mm @ 7" c/c
03 D-5,6 Floor
(22" X 22") Along 22" face:

Location Remarks
No Id Type Details
Along 20" face:
04 D-7,8
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]

Location Remarks
No Id Type Details
Along X Direction: Ø12 mm @ 5" c/c
6 D-9 First Floor Slab
Along Y Direction: Ø12 mm @ 5" c/c
Slab

Location Remarks
No Id Type Details
6 D-10 First Floor Beam
Shear Reinforcement: Ø10 mm @ 6" c/c
Beam Bottom
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
3 REBAR CHECK BY REMOVING CONCRETE COVER
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
3.1 REBAR EXPOSAL LOCATIONS:
Figure 3-1: Location of Rebar exposal for number & diameter verification
3.2 FIELD PHOTOS OF REBAR CHECK:
Figure 3-2: REBAR EXPOSAL Figure 3-3: REBAR DIA. CHECK.
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
4 CONCRETE CORE PULLOUT
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
4.1 LOCATIONS OF CORE CUTTING:
Figure 4-1: Locations of Core Cutting
3.2 FIELD PHOTOS OF CORE CUTTING:
Figure 4-2: Core-1 cutting location Figure 4-3: Core-2 cutting location
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
Figure 4-12: Core-11 cutting location
Figure 4-13: Core-1Sample Figure 4-14: Core-2Sample
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
Figure 4-17:Core-5 Sample Figure 4-18: Core-6 Sample
Figure 4-19:Core-7Sample Figure 4-20: Core-8Sample
Figure 4-23: Core-11Sample
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
4.2 CONCRETE TEST REPORT
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
5 REBAR SAMPLE COLLECTION
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
5.1 FIELD PHOTOS OF REBAR CUTTING:
Figure 5-1: Rebar Collection Figure 5-2: Rebar Cutting
5.2 REBAR TEST REPORT:
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
6 FOUNDATION EXPLORATION
REPORT
GAZIPUR.]
6.1 LOCATION OF FOUNDATION EXPLORATION:
Figure 6.1: Locations of Foundation Exploration
6.2 FIELD PHOTOS OF FOUNDATION EXPLORATION:
Figure 6.2: Foundation Exploration Figure 6.3: Foundation size measure
Figure 6.4: Footing Thickness Measurement Figure 6.5: Checking Depth of footing
ANNEX -II
SOIL TEST REPORT

Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34

DEA Report-Smart Jacket 6-Storied Bldg.

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

DEA Report-Smart Jacket 6-Storied Bldg.

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DEA Report-Smart Jacket 6-Storied Bldg.

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT OF

SMART JACKET (BD) LIMITED

Project type: 6- Storied RCC Building.

Client: SMART JACKET (BD) LIMITED

YOUR SAFETY IS OUR CONCERN

3.5 METHOD OF ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 8

4.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB ........................................................................... 42

5.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB ........................................................................... 73

Figure 3.1.1: Beam Slab System of the Building .............................................................. 5

Figure 3.1.2: 3D View of Analytical Model ...................................................................... 6

Figure 3.8.1: Applied Floor Finish in Typical Floor (25psf) ........................................... 11

Figure 3.8.3: Deflected Shape of the building ................................................................. 12

Figure 4.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan ............................................................................. 13

Figure 4.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model .................................................................... 14

Figure 4.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Built Drawing.............................................. 18

Figure 4.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Model Snapshot. .............................................. 18

Figure 4.2.3: Condition of Column in Grid A ................................................................. 19

Figure 4.2.4: Condition of Column in Grid B ................................................................. 20

Figure 4.2.5: Condition of Column in Grid C ................................................................. 21

Figure 4.2.6: Condition of Column in Grid D ................................................................. 22

Figure 4.2.7: Condition of Column in Grid E.................................................................. 23

Figure 4.2.8: Condition of Column in Grid F .................................................................. 24

Figure 4.2.9: Condition of Column in Grid G ................................................................. 25

Figure 4.2.10: Condition of Column in Grid H ............................................................... 26

Figure 4.2.11: Condition of Column in Grid I ................................................................. 27

Figure 4.2.12: Condition of Column in Grid J ................................................................ 28

Figure 4.2.13: Condition of Column in Grid K ............................................................... 29

Figure 4.2.14: Condition of Column in Grid L ........................................................... 30

Figure 4.2.15: Condition of Column in Grid La ......................................................... 31

Figure 4.2.16: Condition of Column in Grid Lb ......................................................... 32

Figure 4.2.17: Condition of Column in Grid Lc ......................................................... 33

Figure 4.2.18: Condition of Column in Grid Ld ......................................................... 34

Figure 4.2.19: Condition of Column in Grid M .......................................................... 35

Figure 4.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams......................................................................... 36

Figure 4.3.2: Condition of 1st Floor Beams. .................................................................... 37

Figure 4.3.3: Condition of 2 nd to 4th Floor Beams. .......................................................... 38

Figure 4.3.4: Condition of 5 th Floor Beams. .................................................................... 39

Figure 4.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams. ................................................................ 40

Figure 4.3.6: Condition of Water tank level Beams. ....................................................... 41

Figure 5.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan ............................................................................. 44

Figure 5.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model .................................................................... 45

Figure 5.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Built Drawing.............................................. 49

Figure 5.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Model Snapshot. .............................................. 49

Figure 5.2.3: Condition of Column in Grid A ................................................................. 50

Figure 5.2.4: Condition of Column in Grid B ................................................................. 51

Figure 5.2.5: Condition of Column in Grid C ................................................................. 52

Figure 5.2.6: Condition of Column in Grid D ................................................................. 53

Figure 5.2.7: Condition of Column in Grid E.................................................................. 54

Figure 5.2.8: Condition of Column in Grid F .................................................................. 55

Figure 5.2.9: Condition of Column in Grid G ................................................................. 56

Figure 5.2.10: Condition of Column in Grid H ............................................................... 57

Figure 5.2.11: Condition of Column in Grid I ................................................................. 58

Figure 5.2.12: Condition of Column in Grid J ................................................................ 59

Figure 5.2.13: Condition of Column in Grid K ............................................................... 60

Figure 5.2.14: Condition of Column in Grid L ........................................................... 61

Figure 5.2.15: Condition of Column in Grid La ......................................................... 62

Figure 5.2.16: Condition of Column in Grid Lb ......................................................... 63

Figure 5.2.17: Condition of Column in Grid Lc ......................................................... 64

Figure 5.2.18: Condition of Column in Grid Ld ......................................................... 65