FAc-4/ FOL ce : 4. Fe 4 AeTIUG AgausT fe ea SPREAD FOE oe JPREAD Fay : 8B 5S SDR. TRG Mele" AB BS - Aol 830 = Dy. 2526 holm! $80 | Fo Le | mt | LRG ho a aa pits Ans : Rp = 27, 68ke/— SSS SOL AVIV CAPACITY _vV- Pe ee rp’ Le Feivctias tn = QERytKY eiPA6-2/ 7 CARDDIUS + Toeration Secewelyr: oh Tease © 0/34 » 23K nb 30 + 5G A768 fag /_ aoe = 652% 4,00 x 22 kibr?® = MG KE MR LPs 74 dake & Foicticn once) , Fa uF = 4+ FHA4 Kl | Zareoe | 6 LOjl PASSIVE CAPACITY ; p= Atseug _ t+ Jen 32° PA 2 3.05 Anseud seu ¢ ~Jtn 32¢ ACCOMP. cEOTECKH, REPEnT LHe . f 32° fp- f£ aH - &p- y- a = £328 x AF x4? Dpe QT E2500 ATED pope Z,= 23 «L067PAC—3/ RESOLTAUTS OF Forces ACTING AT THE Bean : Be HORIZONTAL FECES + ¢ Ru ) ‘ OE : ~ DFu = Rus Re-Rp- Fe St Pp vee tz d20ky hmm - 24,63 - 28/4 = FR Rue G31d Kha & 67-06£ uy TeQave oP Tersiouar Horects : (M,) bs Ne eal HTD a ZWese= Mx = 05-Pe FOS Fie +046 og i Cs © Hoses HM, = O15" 420+ 0/5 02GB 440A66* 2763 = OB re, U a T= V8 7A wm Kas A Fn a. TE BEAM Fotces RQ Beedine ALALUSH ; pom Cee Mt) Ve 25 128k 85/33 ~~ Ka Hee Wage habe pm on paaaaenttoe M,. 2! 2 sg ke v166 . (F BRC DESI6N For Tie -BEay Bid. FLEXURAL Desice: At ere ot: d= bs dive “ste: 3.2. Skene = esiGey : Vxgct PV«> 625. 686+ Joes 432 Ve 24 26 2 ’ 3.3. Tee sioe DESiC4 PLEASE CHE CH 6 41 S523 ~ ke OSI Stir Mersin OF 43,7 = 0,4» AK COLE =~ 6x204e.7 REAIE ALLO CHECK ooTPoT ATIACHED: Cwle he = Font = AZ O6en? SE PMene Vemrries. StHeag Deqerorcenec7) $ Vinx 0/25: aa - bade #1 - Ores a 937 " " 289 Ky. —* LLB KW) 2804, VERIFIES. PSETWARE soTPor , Are tse...e Ko 2867 VERIF ig J.PAe-5/ PRONTUARIO INFORMATICO DEL HORMIGON ESTRUCTURAL Ei tore Pronuero 3.4 SEGUN EHE-08 Catedra de Hormigén Estructural ETSICCPM -IECA obra Prueba TR Fecha: 30/06/2016 Hora: sp.43:40 Célculo de secciones rectangulares a torsion 4 1 Datos Materiales Tipo de hormigéa ‘Nipo de acero fck [MPa] fyk MPa] Ye % ~ Seccién Seceién : 1200%520 bO {ml = 0.52 ho [a] = 1.20 Pagina 1 de 2Se FOLEDATION STABIZITY ¢ SINEAD FOOLS C4KY Ie BEExB SOx 4.00 ios >> GA. BELDIEE 4 roeces FOOL DATIO“ eptoc 7 M vENtoRIO C= “ZB/79 XFS we = 4.2. CII LAB TRAGINITTED TO S4Acy = 9 key S%~ Ky SLDIUE cHe CATV PKOADS For SRUcTORE (ZC A-3) PEAD = 536 KY 44296 © BASTCAS) = oe SK4R OVER HALE 4 75x 360%23 KAAS Séceweleur SReap FEOTIO€ = BBP 23 Kiln? 665160 Key 6660 ky 281, 75k~o JPREAD Faotiveg = B522 Ky ® CLADDING OVER THE JPReap Fete = 267, 42K BUA KE MA 350 —~PAC-F/ | DW 4850ky t Code ZR 2 46500 ‘Flepioe G §0 + 236,6) * VERN FTES 4.08 | *% 2266 sHeAn Force) @BUIGE FROM Jorrwane- Zo Acconpacce Wit SAES~ -CoF FOL, | 40 | -3- SVERWAKWIVS CHEKIUE aa OVENTORNGS HOUELT = wf yse-slseta re Nevers ABST ky 4 BICHTIOS feomeny » Was Hee 4850.4,75 = POTTS MS 842-4 CO BEG wot EcT7 Sovene = AIF yt COWL ROH CHE Hoven VERIFIED Srey pag 4.3. PRESSE TRALS HITED To soins HT Aé50KY T Ue dGBa~ke 7 io wrany 2x6 dg. ' BxCxb fy 2 =68b C= 667 Pere Loy» LE5 4B faccnnun ~ WSR - sy saaep ver irres.Esfuerzos en arranques Ox | ay (KN) | (KN) ICargas muertas [Sobrecarga de uso| fiento +X exe.+ fiento +Y exe+ IViento -Y exe.+ Iviento -Y exc. 1.5) 7.5] -0.0} -27.0] 0.0) -9.0] 1.8) 0.1 1.0} 0.4 1.8] 0.1 4.0} -0.1 07] -6. 0 63 0.7] 6.0) 1 -7.9}-206.11 ag 32.4246.) 15.3] -769) ICargas muertas \Sobrecarga de uso| Wviento -Y exc.+ Iviento -Y exc.- 0.6) -77.9| KkN-mPOPM Unauthoris EN 1998-1:2004 (E) 1992-1-1:2004), or of the longitudinal reinforcement of boundary clements in walls, may be calculated from the following expression: Ag =5 (4/50 ya ywa) (5.52) where Ag is the area of one leg of the transverse reinforcement; dy, is thediameter of the spliced bar; 5 isthe spacing of the transverse reinforcement; fra is the design value of the yield strength of the longitudinal reinforcement; fri is the design value of the yield strength of the transverse reinforcement, 5.7 Design and detai 1g of secondary seismic elements (OP Clause 5.7 applies to elements designated as secondary seismic elements, which are subjected to significant deformations in the seismic design situation (e.g. slab ribs are not subject to the requirements of 5.7). Such elements shall be designed and detailed to maintain their capacity to support the gravity loads present in the seismic design situation, when subjected to the maximum deformations under the seismic design situation. (2)P_ Maximum deformations due to the seismic design situation shall be calculated in accordance with 4.3.4 and shall account for P-A effects in accordance with 4.4,2.2(2) and (3). They shall be calculated from an analysis of the structure in the seismic design situation, in which the contribution of secondary seismic elements to lateral stiffness is neglected and primary seismic elements are modelled with their cracked flexural and shear stiffness, (3) Secondary seismic elements are deemed to satisfy the requirements of (I)P of this subclause if bending moments and shear forces calculated for them on the basis of: 2) the deformations of (2)P of this subclause; and ) their cracked flexural and shear stiffness, do not exceed their design flexural and shear resistance Mrs and Vara, respectively, as these are defermined on the basis of EN 1992-1-1:2004, 5.8 Concrete foundation elements 581 Scope (OP The following paragraphs apply for the design of concrete foundation elements, such as footings, tie-beams, foundation beams, foundation slabs, foundation walls, pile caps and piles, as well as for connections between such elements, or between them and vertical concrete elements. The design of these elements shall follow the rules of EN 1998-5:2004, 5.4. (2)P If design action effects for the design of foundation elements of dissipative structures are derived on the basis of capacity design considerations in accordance with 4.4.2.6()P, no energy dissipation is expected in these elements in the seismic design situation. The design of these elements may follow the rules of 5.3.2(1)P. 123EN 1998-1:2004 (E) ()P__ If design action effects for foundation clements of dissipative structures are derived on the basis of the analysis for the seismic design situation without the capacity design considerations of 4.4.2,6(2)P, the design of these elements shall follow the corresponding rules for elements of the superstructure for the selected ductility class. For tie-beams and foundation beams the design shear forces need to be derived on the basis of capacity design considerations, in accordance with 5.4.2.2 in DCM buildings, or to 5.5.2.1(2)P, 5.5.2.1(3) in DCH buildings, (4) If design action effects for foundation elements have been derived using a value of the behaviour factor q that is less than or equal to the upper limit of g for low dissipative behaviour (1,5 in concrete buildings, or between 1,5 and 2,0 in steel or composite steel-conerete buildings, in accordance with Note | of Table 6.1 or Note 1 of ‘Table 7.1, respectively), the design of these elements may follow the rules of $.3.2(1)P (see also 4.4.2.6). (5) In box-type basements of dissipative structures, comprising: a) a concrete slab acting as a rigid diaphragm at basement roof level; b) a foundation slab or a grillage of tie-beams or foundation beams at foundation level, and c) peripheral and/or interior foundation walls, designed in accordance with (2)P of this subclause, the columns and ‘beams (including those at the basement roof) are expected to remain elastic under the seismic design situation and may be designed in accordance with 5.3.2(1)P, Shear walls should be designed for plastic hinge development at the level of the basement roof slab. To this end, in walls which continue with the same cross-section above the basement roof, the critical region should be taken to extend below the basement roof level up to @ depth of her (See 5.4.3.4.2(1) and 5.5.3.4.5(1)). Moreover, the full free height of such walls within the basement should be dimensioned in shear assuming that the wall develops its flexural overstrength 7a.Mea (with yee=1,1 for DCM and yeq=1,2 for DCH) at the basement roof level and zero moment at the foundation level. 5.8.2 Tie-beams and foundation beams (JP Stub columas between the top of a footing or pile cap and the soffit of tie-beams cr foundation slabs shall be avoided. To this end, the soffit of tie-beams or foundation slabs shall be below the top of the footing or the pile cap. (2) __ Axial forces in tie-beams or tie-zones of foundation slabs in accordance with 5.4.1.2(6) and (7) of EN 1998-5, should be taken in the verification to act together with the action effects derived in accordance 4,4.2.6(2)P or 4.4.2.6(3) for the seismic design situation, taking into account second-order effects, (3) Tic-beams and foundation beams should have a cross-sectional width of at least by.rin and a cross-sectional depth of at least hnia - NOTE The values ascribed to bys abd hiynie for use in a country may be found in its Nationel ‘Annex to this document. The recommended values are: bynia = 0,25 m and itsia = Om for ‘buildings with up to three storeys, oF yin = 0,5 m for those with four storeys or mote above the ‘basement, (4) Foundation slabs arranged in accordance with EN 1998-5:2004, $.4.1.2@) for the horizontal coninection of individual footings or pile caps, should have a thickness of af feast fain and a reinforcement raiio of at least p,xin at the top and bottom. 124sop alithdrised Ci Ui EN 1998-1:2004 (E) NOTE The values ascribed fo fis and fyxip for use in a country may be found in its National ‘Annex to this document, The recommended values are: fin 0,2 md Pin ~ 0.2%, (8) Tie-beams and foundation beams should have along their full length a longitudinal reinforcement ratio of at least 24ypia at both the top and the bottom. NOTE The value ascribed (0 Pyne for use in a country may be found in its National Annex to this document. The recommended value of pin i 0.4%, 5.8.3 Connections of vertical elements with foundation beams or walls (JP The common (joint) region of a foundation beam or foundation wall and a vortical clement shall follow the rules of 5.4.3.3 or 5.5.3.3 a3 a beam-column joint region. (2) Ifa foundation beam or foundation wall of a DCH structure is designed for action effects derived on the basis of capacity design considerations in accordance with 4,4,2.6(2)P, the horizontal shear force Vina in the joint region is derived on the basis of analysis results in accordance with 4.4.2.6(2)P, (4), (5), and (6). (3) _ If the foundation beam or foundation wall of a DCH structure is not designed in accordance with the capacity design approach of 4.4.2.6(4), (5), (6) (see 5.8.1(3)P), the horizontal shear force Visa in the joint region is determined in accordance with 5.5.2.3(2), expressions (5.22), (5.23), for beam-colurmn joints, (4) Tn. DCM structures the connection of foundation beams or foundation walls with vertical elements may follow the rules of 5.4.3.3. (8) Bends or hooks at the bottom of longitudinal bars of vertical elements should be oriented so that they induce compression into the connection area 5.8.4 Cast-in-place concrete piles and pie caps (1)P_ The top of the pile up to a distance to the underside of the pile cap of twice the pile cross-sectional dimension, d, as well as the regions up to a distance of 2d on each side of an interface between two soil layers with markedly different shear stiffness (ratio of shear moduli greater than 6), shall be detailed as potential plastic hinge regions. To this end, they shall be provided with transverse and confinement reinforcement following the rules for column critical regions of the corresponding ductility class or of at least DOM. Q)P__ When the requirement specified in $.8.1(3)P is applied for the design of piles of dissipative structures, piles shall be designed and detailed for potential plastic hinging at the head. To this end, the length over which increased transverse and confinement reinforcement is required at the top of the pile in accordance with (IDP of this subclause is increased by 50%. Moreover, the ULS verification of the pile in shear shall use a design shear force at least equal to that computed on the basis of 4.4.2.6(4) to (8). @) Piles required to resist tensile forces or assumed as rotationally fixed at the top, should be provided with anchorage in the pile cap to enable the development of the pile design uplift resistance in the soil, or of the design tensile strength of the pile 425EN 1908-1:2004 (E) 5.10 Provisions for concrete diaphragms (1) A solid reinforced concrete slab may be considered to serve as a diaphragm, if it has a thickness of not less than 70 mm and is reinforced in both horizontal directions with at least the minimum reinforcement specified in EN 1992-1-1:2004 2) — Acast-in-place topping on a precast floor or roof system may be considered as a | diaphragm, if: a) it meets the requirements of (I) of this subclause; b) it is designed to provide alone the required diaphragm stiffhess and resistance; and c) it is cast over a clean, rough substrate, or connected to it through shear connectors. (3)P_ The seismic design shall include the ULS verification of reinforced concrete diaphragms in DCH structures with the following properties: f — irregular geometries or divided shapes in plan, entrances; regular and large openings in the diaphragm; ~ irregular distribution of masses and/or stiffinesses (as e.g. in the case of set-backs or off-sets); — basements with walls located only in part of the perimeter or only in part of the ground floor area; (4) Action-effects in reinforced concrete diaphragms may be estimated by modelling the diaphragm as a deep beam or a plane truss or strut-and-tie model, on clastic supports. (5) __ The design values of the action effects should be derived taking into account (©) The design resistances should be derived in accordance with EN 1992-1-1:2004, (1) __ In cases of core or wall structural systems of DCH, it should be verified that the transfer of the horizontal forces from the diaphragms to the cores or walls has occurred. In this respect the following provisions apply: 4) the design shear stress at the interface of the diaphragm and a core or wall should be limited to 1,5fag, to control cracking; b) an adequate strength to guard against shear sliding failure should be ensured, assuming that the strut inclination is 45°. Additional bars should be provided, contributing to the shear strength of the interface between diaphragms and cores or walls; anchorage of these bars should follow the provisions of 5.6. 5.11 Precast concrete structures 5.11.1 General 5.1.1.1 Scope and structural types horiséd Copy’ (AP Clause 5.11 applies to the seismic design of concrete structures constructed partly or entirely of precast elements. 127 OhtaST DIOULAMOMPOIE 0 STURMETANOTIPOTS :091u9.499]9 024109 WAN-WLYN UP SEIMONIST OP OPE/IOSy JOSAJOd UOIIINUISUOD DOI OP LISS ep ugMeoyIPF ap seinjonasy ep ‘o}dq S2|DUOW Zanb}Jpoy o1buas ‘oseJoud Wdn-Wi v3 “NOTI¥LITIG¥H3e NS A SOIZIIINI $O1 30 SVUNLINYLSA N3 YALSVW SALOTIdOYIIW AD A S¥NNILNOD SVTIVLNYd AG NOIDVLINISNY ANQIINIALA ‘OLIAAONd 13 NF SOITLIVUd SOSWI‘sy 77 lord Onpaireison Ohad 009 97338100 af IS ASIST UIA Sva270S jij OLO If OSA DZ bord “W/Y O90'S05 +4, a sis Cob rs dea 2TEE OOF) FH” (rmmd sum)ui 09°04 = 7° SE-vH wogo Bt YSO7 toyNBCF rues “Yar ve ¥2In oned| vorreLoWd semis | odveros wd ZPAMNL ‘WaR?0S Seaviyos wod SPUIIUSOS 906 SILVIO SOT “OIDIAUSS HF jres20d 26 IGVAS wan-Wivna sbanjonuys3 oppiz0sy wJosajodg ‘ontusg4, a42a4inbay sapuow zanbjspoy o1bas sazojdouonu ap sojoyung ‘A upBiuusoy ap sonuuo> sojjoyuog :NQIONBANOD 30 S31SDG14 SOLNSWIT2 NOTOVATMEYH3Y NS 4 SOTDTITGI 507.30 SvUnuoneis3 NB YaLSYWwan-wivna soun4oni4s3 opviz0sy Josajodg oo1use. ex2auinbay saypuow Zanbyspoy 06405 “sojoydosnu 9p soypsurog ‘ ug6iuutoy 2p sonuuos sojpoyuog :NQTONBINO? 30 S31eIX314 SOANaW3Ta ‘wan-wivea NOIDYAITTEYHaA NS & SOIZTSIGI 501.30 Svunionuis2 Na WBISYW