Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4 Demand Analysis
Chapter 4 Demand Analysis
Demand
1
11-08-2020
Law of Demand
Substitution Effect
Income Effect
2
11-08-2020
QdX/PX < 0+
QdX/I > 0 if a good is normal
QdX/I < 0 if a good is inferior
QdX/PY > 0 if X and Y are substitutes
QdX/PY < 0 if X and Y are complements
Horizontal summation of
demand curves of
individual consumers
• Bandwagon Effect
• Snob Effect
3
11-08-2020
4
11-08-2020
PX Intercept:
a0 + a2N + a3I + a4PY + a5T
Slope:
QX/PX = a1
QX
Eg. Qx =100-5Px
5
11-08-2020
Q / Q Q P
Point Definition EP
P / P P Q
P
Linear Function EP a1
Q
If Qx =100-5Px ; a1 = ?
7
6 A Ep = -∞
Q=600-100P
5
4
B
C
Price
3 F Ep =1
2
1
0
J Ep =0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Q / Q Q P
1. At point B: EP = - (100/1) * (5/100)
P / P P Q
= -1(5/1) = -5
3. At point J = -(100/1)(0/6) = 0
6
11-08-2020
7
11-08-2020
PX
EP 1
EP 1
EP 1
QX
MRX
8
11-08-2020
TR MR>0 MR<0
EP 1 EP 1
QX
EP 1 MR=0
E P 1 MR=0
PX QX
EP 1
EP 1
EP 1
QX
MRX
9
11-08-2020
Determinants of Price
Elasticity of Demand
Demand for a commodity will be less
elastic if:
It has few substitutes
It is broadly defined
Less time is available to adjust to a
price change
10
11-08-2020
Q / Q Q I
Point Definition EI
I / I I Q
I
Linear Function EI a3
Q
Q2 Q1 I2 I1
Arc Definition EI
I 2 I1 Q2 Q1
11
11-08-2020
QX / QX QX PY
Point Definition EXY
PY / PY PY QX
Linear Function PY
E XY a4
QX
QX 2 QX 1 PY 2 PY1
Arc Definition EXY
PY 2 PY 1 QX 2 QX 1
Substitutes Complements
EXY 0 EXY 0
12
11-08-2020
13
11-08-2020
Q ----------- (2)
= - b1aP-b1-1 Ib2
P b
b1 1* Q
= a P-b1 Ib2 = P
-------- (3)
p
Thus, Q
P
= -b1
---------- (4)
P Q
Constant-elasticity demand function is often used by managers and
managerial economists, for several reasons:
First, in contrast to the linear demand function, this mathematical form
recognizes that the effect of price on quantity depends on the level of
income, and that the effect of income on quantity depends on the
level of price. Thus, multiplicative relationship in equation (1) is often
more realistic than additive relationship in linear equations.
Second, like the linear demand function, the constant-elasticity demand
function is relatively easy to estimate. If we take logarithms of both
sides of equation (1),
logQ = log a - b1 log P + b2log I
Since this equation is linear in the logarithms, the parameters- a, b1,
and b2 can readily be estimated by regression analysis.
1. 15 200 3000
12 300 3600 Ep>1
2. 15 200 3000
12 250 3000 Ep=1
3. 15 200 3000
12 210 2520 Ep<1
14
11-08-2020
In equilibrium, MC = MR.
1
Hence, MR = MC = P 1 Pe
1
P = MC
1
1
Pe
1
Now, 1) If MC =10, Pe = -2, then P =10
1
1
= 20.0
2
1
2) If MC =10, Pe = -5, then P =10
1
1
= 12.5
5
15
11-08-2020
16
11-08-2020
New Delhi: The new-age tablet is apparently gobbling up the PC market. Sales of tablets shot up from just 3.6 lakh
units in 2011-12 to over 19 lakh in the last fiscal, a jump of over 400%, even as desktop PC sales grew by just 1%.
The picture can't be display ed.
The picture can't be display ed.
Latest data released by the Manufacturers’ Association for Information Technology (MAIT) on Wednesday showed
the demand for tablets was driven by users’ desire for apps (applications) to track everything from calories burned
to the weather to navigating the city.
Although India was a late entrant to the world of smart phones and tablets, it now seems to be moving in line with
global trends, with users climbing up the ladder. Smartphone sales went past 1.5 crore units in 2012-13, compared
to over 95 lakh in the previous year. Desktop computer sales was at 67.69 lakh units.
BIG BITE
- 19 lakh tablets sold in 2012-13, up from just 3.6 lakh the year before, a growth of 427%
- Just 1% growth in desktop sales in 2012-13; overall PC market up 5%
- 79% of tablet-buyers owned a PC or Smartphone
- 21% were 1st-time buyers of a computing device
PSUs, govt institutions keep PCs alive But unlike the international market, where PC sales have declined for
straight quarters, institutional demand and purchases in smaller towns is keeping companies in business.
The latest International Data Corporation (IDC) numbers show that PC sales fell almost 14% in January-March
2013, while tablets surged 143% 4.9 crore units. In fact, the first quarter global tablet sales was more than what
was sold during January-June 2012, reflecting skyrocketing demand in emerging markets such as India.
With prices going down, consumers have plenty to choose from. Right from the top-notch Apple iPads that cost
around Rs 50,000 to a gamut of devices from Samsung and then percolating down to home-grown brands like
Micromax and Karbonn, tablets come for as low as Rs 5,000.
A bulk of the desktop PC sales is restricted to government, PSUs and educational establishments, which together
account for as much as 65% of the sales. “In terms of household sales, these are happening in what I would call
the ‘rest of India’, or C-class towns. The metros and B-class towns are no longer major buyers of desktops,” said
Ramamurthy, who now wants a special package from the government to “revive” the PC market. TNN
17
11-08-2020
18
11-08-2020
2. A firm has estimated the following demand function for its product:
Q = 100 − 5P + 5I + 15A; where Q is quantity demanded per month in
thousands, P is product price, I is an index of consumer income, and A
is advertising expenditures per month in thousands. Assume that
P = $200, I =150, and A = 30. Use the point formulas to complete the
elasticity calculations indicated below.
19