Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study Guide Robson Chapters 6-7
Study Guide Robson Chapters 6-7
116-25
1) What was the “battle for the lira”? Who benefited and who lost as a result of this policy?
(P. 84, 85)
The battle for the lira took place after 1925 when Mussolini (the Duce) attempted the revaluation of
the Italian currency. By 1926, the industrial boom had come to an end and the expanse rate of lira was
falling against other currencies. The exchange rate fell to 150 lira to the pound. This inflation did not sit
well with Mussolini so he fought to defend the lira by setting the exchange rate to 90 lira per pound. This
restored the value the lira held in October 1922. The Revolution of the lira should have helped the Italian
consumer because imports of foods and other products from abroad should have become cheaper.
However, the Duce prevented this by placing high tariffs on many foreign imports. This furthered the
autarky Mussolini strived for.
Who benefited:
- the Duce achieved the propaganda victory he desired
- Steel, armaments and shipbuilding industries that needed large supplies of cheap tariff-free
imported raw materials —> promoted through the Fascist rule
Who lost:
- foreign bankers saw the policy as a way to restrict government spending
- “The effects in the Italian economy were far from beneficial” (85).
- Foreign buyers found Italian goods nearly twice as expensive… therefore, Italian export
industries (including textiles, Turin, and many others) went into depression.
- Unemployment trebled in the years 1926-8
2) What was the “corporate state” supposed to accomplish in theory? What was the reality?
(P. 85-87)
The reality:
- Unemployment fell and the de Stefani’s policies curbed inflation
- Rivalries within the Fascist Party
- Workers were unable to choose their own union representatives in their corporation, and instead
had Fascist nominees foisted on them. These Fascist officials tended to side with the employers’
representatives over the key issue of wages and working conditions
- Conflict between employer and employee was not solved, only suppressed
- Living standards (see page 89)
4) Why did Mussolini pursue the economic strategy of autarky in the mid-1930s? What were
its effects? (P. 88)
Mussolini believed that Italy needed to be prepared for war as it was inevitable in Europe or to further
his African Empire. Economic sanctions banning trade with Italy in certain goods grain, steel, and
textiles were put into place by the League of Nations which backed up the Duce’s reasons for autarky.
Exports took low priority as Mussolini focused on Italy’s ability to self-sustain. Unfortunately, Italy still
remained far from self-sufficient when the Duce joined the Second World War in 1940. Oil, coal, and
iron ore which are essential to creating steel still had to be imported in very large quantities. The drive for
autarky in fact only succeeded in worsening Italy’s financial difficulties.
5) What was the “battle for grain”? What were the impacts of Fascist policies on Italian
agriculture and agricultural workers? (P. 90-92)
6) What is the historical significance of the quote, “Mussolini made the trains run on time”?
(P. 93)
This phrase was coined by foreign journalists (newspapers such as Britain’s Financial Times) to
suggest that the Fascist regime had somehow improved the efficiency of Italian industries. A number of
modern historians still argue that fascism did much to improve the economy.
1) Why did Mussolini negotiate the Lateran Agreements of 1929? What were the terms of this
agreement? What did each side get? (P. 100-102)
To end conflict between the Church and Italy that had existed for over 60 year. It established Catholicism
as the state religion. The church supported Mussolini. Specific examples of what the church got are on
page 101.
At what point, and for what reasons, did these agreements begin to fall apart?
Mussolini wanted influence over the youth but the church wanted to maintain what they had. Both sides
would not move in their ways or compromise. They each advertised their ideas to different parties and on
separate media.
3) What was the “battle for births” and how did it fit with other Fascist policies towards
women? How successful was it? (P. 104-105)
- Mussolini pushed for an increase of population
- Population increased from 40 million to 60 million by 1950
- Fit with the policy of women being forced to stay home
- The birth rate declined
- Women either stayed working to support their families or because they enjoyed the freedom
4) Oh my goodness. What are your thoughts about schooling in Fascist Italy? Be sure to read
the primary sources and look at the pictures. Please include the term ONB (Opera
Nazionale Balilla) (P. 106-108)
He first obtained the loyalty of the teachers and then by the next 2 years everything would be set in stone.
He dreamed of and strived for millions of aggressive, athletic, disciplined Fascist youth. “The eyes of the
Duce are on every one of you”. Obedience, obedience, obedience. They are worshiping Mussolini and
Fascism like a god (Source C). The ONB was basically mandatory sports and physical activity outside of
school for the fascist youth. A lot of military training as well, the girls actually focused on sewing,
singing, and childcare more so.
5) What was the Dopolavoro? Why was it successful when Mussolini’s other attempts at
promoting Fascist ways among adults were not? What does this tell us about Italian
Fascism? (P. 109-111)
The Dopolavoro was set up in 1925 to provide leisure activities that would influence workers towards a
Fascist view of life and compensate for the now defunct trade-union-sponsored clubs. Memberships
peaked in 1939 at 4 million. Working class Italians did not need much convincing to join, just the
activities and the name was enough to get them to join.
1) Mussolini wanted to make Italy, “great, respected and feared.” To what extent was he able
to do this in the 1920s? (P. 117-119)
“Italy would achieve Great Power status via military build-up, diplomatic intrigue and, if need be, war”.
He was basically so greedy that he kept trying to snatch up land in the 1930s and even lead Italy into a
disastrous world war that resulted in the fall of Fascism and the death of the Duce himself. Italy in 1922
had a secure position in Europe but was unable to except a great deal of influence, either diplomatically or
militarily. Any changes in the European status quo would require the consent of Britain and France, and
smaller powers had few means of extracting concessions. A resurgent Italy would have to move carefully.
Yugoslavia and Albania (1924) (I know you want to name your firstborn Zog).
He was more successful this time so that’s good for him I guess. He’s kind of a bully though so
that’s gross. He gained lots of popularity which made him happy. The Duce’s success over Fiume
persuaded him that Yugoslavia could be pushed around. He didn’t like the French’s influence in
the state and wanted to promote Fascism. Ahmed Zog :)
3) What were the results of the Italian conquest of Ethiopia (also known as Abyssinia) in
1935? (P. 123-125)
Domestic response:
- the public was uncertain
- They weren’t that excited but jumped at the opportunity to show Italy’s power over the Great
Powers
- Overall, it increased Mussolini’s support
International response:
- France and Britain were outraged (as they should be, Mussolini was being a bully)
- Ban of Italian goods within the League of Nations
- Didn’t impact that greatly
- Mussolini increasingly saw the western powers as weak