Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

INTERNAL ASSIGNMENT ON CHILD LAW & JUVENILE JUSTICE

ENROLLMENT NUMBER: - 19043122035

NAME OF THE STUDENT: - MOHAMMAD ISHFAQ NAIK

COURSE: - LL.B. (5th.SEMESTER)
BATCH: - 2019 (Morning Shift)
PAPER: - VI [Code – LB08S]
SUBJECT: - CHILD LAW & JUVENILE JUSTICE

TOPIC FOR THE ASSIGNMENT: - Safeguards to Children under Constitution of India.

TEACHER INCHARGE
Dr. Saba Manzoor
Teacher,School of law

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 1
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

University Of Kashmir

Internal Assignment on Child law & Juvenile Justice

Max. Marks for the Assignments= 20 Marks
Marks Obtained= ________________
CONTENTS
S.No Content Page No.

1 INTRODUCTION 03

2 THE DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE 03

POLICY AND THE CHILD RIGHTS
3 RIGHT TO EDUCATION 04

4 PROMOTION OF EDUCATIONAL INTERESTS 06

IN WEAKER SECTIONS
5 RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATION OF 06
CHILDREN
6 SOME IMPORTANT CASE LAWS 08-10

8 CONCLUSION 11

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 2
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

TOPIC FOR THE ASSIGNMENT: CHILD RIGHTS IN THE CONSTITUTION OF

INDIA

INTRODUCTION:

Justice Bhagawati once quoted, “The child is a soul with a being, a nature and capacities of its
own, who must be helped to find them, to grow into maturity, into fullness on physical and
vital energy and most breadth, depth and height of its emotional, intellectual and spiritual
being.” 

Children are the future of every nation, and the accurate measurement of a nation’s development
lies in its children’s condition. The Indian Constitution is one of the few constitutions globally,
with extensive provisions for protecting children’s rights. The Children’s rights are secured
in PART III (Fundamental Rights) and PART IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) of
the Constitution.
Article 15(4) allows the State to make special provisions for the children’s welfare and
protection. Report 21 encompasses many rights, a couple of which are the right to education and
the freedom against sexual assault and rape. Article 21Aexpressly states that every child
between the age of six and 14 has the fundamental right to free and compulsory
education. Articles 23 and 24 protect children from trafficking, forced labour, and employment
in hazardous works. The Directive Principles of State Policy in Articles 39, 41, 45, and 46 cast
an obligation on the State to work for children’s welfare. The Fundamental Rights read,
children’s, and the Directive Principles form a comprehensive structure of children’s interest
rights.
THE DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY AND THE CHILD RIGHTS
The Directive Principles of State Policy, which are contained in Articles 36 to 51 of the
Constitution, are inspired by the Irish Constitution. The Constitution makers had envisaged that
the fundamental rights alone would not help much in alleviating the socio-economic conditions
prevailing in India and hence added the DPSP in the Constitution to realize the potential of a
welfare State fully. Fundamental Rights and DPSP are meant to supplement each other[1].

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 3
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

The purpose of DPSP is to fix specific socio-economic goals, which can be attained by a non-
violent social revolution[2]. The Indian Constitution is a transformative and revolutionary one,
which has given numerous safeguards to protect the children’s rights and welfare. The
Constitution, through the fundamental rights and the DPSP, guarantees several rights and
protection for children.

RIGHT TO EDUCATION
Initially, the obligation of the State to educate the children as enshrined in Articles
41 and 45. The Constitution makers rightly believed that educating the children would be the
most effective way to eradicate India’s social vices for centuries. Hence they inserted the
obligation of the State to educate the children in the Directive Principles. However, the Directive
Principles aren’t as effective as the Fundamental Rights. The DPSP has been inserted in the
Constitution to give specific directions to the State as to how, in what manner, and what purpose
they are to exercise its powers. 
The downside of DPSP is that they are specifically made non-enforceable by any Court of
Law. Article 37 categorically states that the DPSP is non-enforceable by any Court. Still, it also
says that the principles contained in the DPSP are fundamental in the governance of the country.
Subsequently, many judicial decisions have established that the DPSP is to be construed in
harmonium with the Fundamental Rights and the State shall not violate them.
Article 41 states that the State shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development,
make effective provision for securing the right to work, right to education and public assistance
in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, and in other cases of undeserved
want.
Article 45 states that the State shall endeavour to provide early childhood care and education for
all children until they complete the age of fourteen years. The State is required to provide free
education to all children up to the age of 14 years, within 10 years from the commencement of
the Constitution.
However, Article 45 proved insufficient and the Parliament in 2002[3] substituted Article 45
with Article 21A which made free and compulsory education a fundamental right under Part

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 4
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

III of the Constitution. Apart from Articles 41, 45 and 21A, the Supreme Court has culled out
Right to Education from Right to Life enshrined in Article 21. 
The Supreme Court inferred the Right to Education from Article 21 in the case of MOHINI
JAIN V STATE OF KARNATAKA[4] even before it was made an exclusive fundamental
right under Article 21A.
The question whether Right to Life enshrined in Article 21 includes the Right to Education
arose before the Supreme Court for the first time in the case of Mohini Jain which was
concerned with the collection of capitation fees by educational institutions. The Court held
that,
“Even though the Constitution, as such, does not make Right to Education a fundamental
right, a cumulative reading of Article 21 along with Directive Principles enshrined in Articles
41, 45, 38 and 39(a) makes it clear that the framers of the Constitution made it obligatory for
the State to provide education to its citizens.”
The Court observed that the Right to Live with Dignity would be incomplete without the Right to
Education as education constitutes an indispensable tool to help man live with dignity. The Court
further argued that the rights under Article 19 such as the Right to Speech and Expression cannot
be fully realized without the aid of education. Hence Right to Education is concomitant to
Fundamental Rights and the State is bound by the Constitutional mandate to provide
education to all citizens at all levels.
It is pertinent to note that in the Mohini Jain case, the Supreme Court viewed Right to Education
under an absolutist lens and made a liberal and extremely expansive interpretation of Article 21
and mandated that the Constitution has put the State under an obligation to provide education to
all citizens at all levels.

However, in UNNIKRISHNAN V STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [5] the Supreme Court

reiterated that the Right to Education rightfully flows from Right to Life enshrined in Article 21.
But it denounced the absolutist stance it took in Mohini Jain case. Instead, it held that,
“The State is under a Constitutional mandate to provide free and compulsory education only
under up to the age of fourteen, beyond which the State’s obligation is subject to the limits of
the economic capacity of the State.”

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 5
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

Subsequent to the Unnikrishnan case, in 2002, the Parliament inserted Article 21A which

expressly guaranteed every citizen the Right to Free and Compulsory Education up to the age of
fourteen. Education to children has been made compulsory by making it a fundamental duty of
parents or guardians under Article 51A to provide educational opportunities to their wards.
In 2009, the Parliament enacted the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education
Act, 2009 which guaranteed every child of age six and above the right to enroll in a
neighborhood school and get free education.

PROMOTION OF EDUCATIONAL INTERESTS IN WEAKER SECTIONS:

Article 46 obligates the State to promote with special care the educational and economic
interests of the weaker sections of the people, in particular, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes and to protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation.
Owing to the discrimination and subjugation faced by the lower castes and communities for
centuries, most of these people were either denied the right to education or were disinterested in
educating their children due to extreme poverty and social apathy. The social advancement of
these communities was largely dependent on educating their children. Hence it became one of
the goals of the Constitution makers to educate and uplift such suppressed and weaker section of
the people. It was with this noble intention the Constitution made it an obligation for the State to
take extra efforts to promote educational and economic interests in such weaker sections of
the society.
In the case of SOCIETY FOR UNAIDED PRIVATE SCHOOLS OF RAJASTHAN V
UNION OF INDIA [6], the question before the Court was what encompassed the meaning of
‘weaker sections’ with respect to Article 46. The Court held that the term ‘weaker sections’
doesn’t mean only Backward Class as Article 16(4) doesn’t comprise all the weaker sections of
the society but only those which are socially, economically and educationally backwards. Hence
the term ‘weaker sections’ in Article 46 is wider than ‘Backward Class’ given in Article 16(4).

RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 6
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

Article 23 prohibits human trafficking and forced labour. Clause 1 of Article 23 states that traffic
in human beings and the beggar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any
contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with the law.
Child trafficking is a big menace in India where children trafficked are either sold as bonded
labours or pushed into prostitution. Children, especially those from the lower strata of the society
are at a higher risk of being trafficked. ‘Traffic in human beings’, commonly known as slavery,
means the buying and selling of human beings as if they are chattels[7] The Constitution of India
guarantees every person the right against exploitation and has made it an offence punishable by
law.

Article 24 prohibits the employment of children under the age of fourteen in any factory, mine
or any other work of hazardous nature. This puts a constitutional mandate on the State to protect
children under the age of 14 and prohibit their employment in any factory, mine or hazardous
work, even if there is no legislation prohibiting the same. Hence, people employing under 14
children in hazardous work, thereby endangering their safety and health cannot take the defence
of lack of legislation on the subject matter. The Constitution categorically prohibits any
employment of children under 14 which affects their health or safety. Every child has the
fundamental right not to be exploited or abused.
Article 23 and 24 are read along with the Directive Principles given in clauses (e) and (f) of
Article 39 to give a wholesome view of a child’s fundamental right to not be abused or exploited.
The Directive Principles given in Article 39(e) and (f) further strengthen the rights of children.

ARTICLE 39(e) AND (f):

Article 39 lists out certain principles of policy which are to be followed by the State. Article
39(e) and 39(f) specifically talk about the welfare of children. Both these clauses of Article 39
protect children from exploitation and direct the State to provide a safe and healthy environment
to grow in. This is an important provision given the socio-economic conditions of India which
push lakhs of children into bonded labour and exploitation, thereby curtailing their fundamental
rights and endangering their health and safety.

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 7
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

Article 38(e) provides that the State shall direct its policy towards securing the health and
strength of workers, men and women, and the tender age of children are not abused and that
citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter vocations unsuited to their age or strength.
Article 39(f) provides that the State shall direct its policy towards securing that children are
given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and conditions of freedom and
dignity and that childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and against moral and
material abandonment.
One of the biggest hurdles India faces is child labour and bonded labour. While child labour is
largely due to economic constraints on the family, the menace of bonded labour has medieval
roots where people belonging to vulnerable castes and communities who were illiterate were
exploited for generations, akin to slaves. Poverty and illiteracy are the biggest torchbearers of
child and bonded labour. The condition of girl children is even worse since in most cases they
are not only physically exploited but also sexually abused. In some cases, they are even at the
risk of child trafficking.
Article 39 provides constitutional safeguards against child abuse and exploitation and even
though the DPSP are not on par with the Fundamental Rights they have inspired a number of
PILs and legislations to protect children against exploitation. The Constitutional provisions
reflect the great anxiety of the Constitution makers to protect and safeguard the interests and
welfare of the children of India[8].

ISSUE OF CHILD LABOUR

BANDHUA MUKTI MORCHA V UNION OF INDIA [9]
 is a landmark case in abolishing child and bonded labour.  The Supreme Court was faced with
the issue of bonded labour and kidnapped children who were exploited by Uttar Pradesh’s carpet
industry. The Court appointed committee shed light on the rampant practise of bonded labour in
UP’s carpet industry and also revealed that many children were kidnapped from Bihar and forced
into labour. The Court relied on Articles 21, 23, 41, 42 and 39 (e) and (f) and secured the
release and rehabilitation of such victims. The Court observed that,
“The right to live with human dignity enshrined in Article 21 derives its life breath from the
Directive Principles of State Policy and particularly clauses (e) and (f) of Article 39, Article 41

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 8
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

and 42 and at the least, therefore, it must include protection of the health and strength of
workers, men and women, and of the tender age of children against abuse, opportunities and
facilities for children to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity,
educational facilities, just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief.”

PEOPLE’S UNION FOR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS V UNION OF INDIA [10]

Popularly known as the Asiad case, is a PIL where several human rights and labour law
violations in the construction industry was brought to the notice of the Supreme Court. One such
issue before the Court was the employment of children below the age of 14 in the construction
industry. The Supreme Court held that,

“Although the construction industry was not included in the schedule to the Employment of
Children Act, 1938 and hence the prohibition under section 3(3) of the said Act did not apply
to the construction industry, employment of children under the age of 14 in factories, mines
and other hazardous work is in direct violation of Article 24 and also Convention No. 59 of the
International Labour Organisation. This is a constitutional prohibition and even in the
absence of any proper legislation, should operate propiro vigore.”

MC MEHTA V STATE OF TAMIL NADU  [11]

 popularly known as the Sivakasi Match Factory case, the Supreme Court acknowledged that the
menace of child labour is spread wide across the country and the State is obligated by Articles
24, 41, 47 and 39(e) and (f) to abolish child labour and provide a safe and healthy environment
for the development of children.

WELFARE OF ADOPTED CHILDREN

LAKHMIKANT PANDEY V UNION OF INDIA [12]
which is a PIL to regulate and establish guidelines for intercountry adoption, it was alleged that
the Indian children adopted by foreigners were being abused and exploited as there were no
proper guidelines to regulate the same. The Supreme Court stressed on the dangers of
unregulated adoptions and observed that “It is obvious in a civilised society the importance of

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 9
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

child welfare cannot be overemphasized, because the welfare of the entire community, its
growth and development depend on the health and well being of its children. Children are a
supremely important national asset and the future well being of the nation depends on how its
children grow and develop.” The Supreme Court, in consultation with several child rights
groups, laid down procedural and normative guidelines for intercountry adoptions.

WELFARE OF CHILD PROSTITUTES

VISHAL JEET V UNION OF INDIA [13]
In this case, the plight of children pushed into prostitution and sex trafficking was brought before
the Supreme Court and the petitioner sought certain directions on the issue of sex trafficking of
women and children and the subsequent rehabilitation of child prostitutes by State agencies. The
Court emphasised on the need for a humanistic approach towards the rehabilitation of child
prostitutes rather than a purely legal one. The Court relied on constitutional provisions having a
bearing on the issue such as Articles 21, 23, 35(a) (ii), 39(a), (e) and (f) and issued the following
directions inter alia to the state governments and Union Territories.
1.  Directly concerned law enforcing authorities to take appropriate and speedy action under the
existing laws in eradicating child prostitution.

2.  Take steps in providing adequate and rehabilitative homes.

3. Set up separate Advisory Committee consisting of relevant government officials, sociologists,

criminologists, members of the women/ child welfare/ voluntary social organizations to make
suggestions for eradicating child prostitution and the devdasi and jogin tradition; and measures
for care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of victims.
GAURAV JAIN V UNION OF INDIA [14]
which emphasised on the stigma ridden fates of the children of prostitutes, the Supreme Court
held that the children of prostitutes hold the same rights as any other child in the country; that
they have the right to equality of opportunity, dignity, care, protection and rehabilitation so as to
be part of the mainstream of social life without any pre-stigma attached on them. The Supreme
Court set up a committee to study the issue and come up with a scheme to rehabilitate child
prostitutes and the children of prostitutes and their successful integration into the Indian society.
Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 10
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN V OM PRAKASH [15]

the Supreme Court shed light on the sensitivity of child rape cases and their mishandling by law
enforcement agencies and Courts. The Supreme Court relied on the ‘special safeguard’ provided
in the Constitution under Article 39 for children to caution Courts and law enforcement agencies
to handle such cases with care and sensitivity.

CONCLUSION
India is a country with rich and beautiful culture but is unfortunately polluted with certain social
maladies deep-rooted in the society which still plague us today. The Constitution makers tried
their best to counter these social vices by drafting an exhaustive Constitution which guarantees
an array of rights for the people of India. It also has special and exclusive provisions to uplift and
safeguard the rights of vulnerable sections of the society. As violence against children in India
grows at an abdominal rate, the Constitution comes forward with a well-thought array of rights to
protect the children. However, where the country fails its children is not in the recognition or the
prompt interpretation of their rights but in the proper implementation of such rights, laws and
guidelines. The mere recognition of rights on paper is not sufficient to protect children. Social
awareness, coupled with sensitivity towards children’s rights and proper implementation of the
laws is what that makes the children of India truly safe and their rights fully realised.

ENDNOTES & REFRENCES:

[1] Kesavananda Bharathi V State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461
[2] Pathumma V State of Kerala, AIR 1978 SC 771
[3] Section 3 of the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002
[4] AIR 1992 SC 1858
[5] AIR 1993 SC 2178
[6] AIR 2012 SC 3445(2490)

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 11
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

[7] Jain, M. P., Chelameswar, J., & Naidu, D. S. (2019). Indian constitutional law. Gurgaon,
Haryana, India: LexisNexis.
[8] Lakshmi Kant Pandey V Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 496
[9] AIR 1984 SC 802
[10] (1982) 3 SCC 235
[11] AIR 1997 SC 699
[12] ibid
[13] AIR 1990 SC 1412
[14] AIR 1990 SC 292
[15] (2002) 5 SCC 745

Assignment Child Law & Juvenile

Justice Paper VI (LL.B 5th. Sem.) as
assigned by the concerned revered
teacher is here by submitted for
evaluation with the request for
feedback, criticism and suggestions for
further improvement in future.

Assignment evaluated and checked by

…………………………………..

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 12
 Internal Assignment on Child Law & Juvenile Justice (PaperVI)

Assignment on Child Rights in the Constitution of India (Child & Juvenile Law) ,Presentation
prepared & Compiled by Mohammad Ishfaq Naik, LL.B 5th. Sem. School of Law, University of
Kashmir Page 13