Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CTT-5A-Getting To The So What - Document - To Share
CTT-5A-Getting To The So What - Document - To Share
Academy
Driving Analysis to Insight: Getting to the "So What"
August 2017
Our training today: Getting to the "So What"
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document is for training participants only and is not to
be distributed to others without explicit BCG permission
1 2 3 4 5
Hypothesis-Driven Modeling Structuring your Getting to the Leading effective
Problem Solving Analysis Message "So-What" meetings
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
• Ensures focus: • Ensures analytic • Ensures clarity: • Ensures action: • Ensures impact:
Why
sets the right level of rigor: highlights the "so driving analysis to create and
does it supports what", allowing to actionable insights conduct effective
detail for the right
matter topics hypotheses with decide and take meetings
? logic and data action
The Four Key BCG Success Factors to get to "so what" 60 minutes
Break 15 minutes
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Exercises: Try it yourself! 60 minutes
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Iterate if needed
"80/20 behavior"
Many people have seen … but Isaac Newton took the next step to
these common occurrences … get insight as to why they happened
Law of Universal Gravitation
• "Two particles attract one
another with a force directly
An apple falling from a tree
proportional to their mass"
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Newton's First Law of Motion
• "An object at rest tends to stay
at rest, and an object in motion
tends to stay in motion unless
acted upon by an external force"
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
CTT-5A-Getting to The So What_Document- to share.pptx Draft—for discussion only 6
We are here to help you solve situations you might face
during your project work
Mr. Manager
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
This is just a bunch of
random numbers ...
what are you trying to
tell me??
- CEO
Many people can point out these … but our value comes from getting to
common observations … the "so what"
"Sales are down 20% this year." "Sales are down 20% because of changes in
consumer preferences. Rebranding is required to
improve business."
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
"Customer satisfaction has been "Customer satisfaction has been declining
decreasing the past 18 months." because of poor support staff training, and
production quality issues."
"The market looks appealing." "The market is appealing because companies are
adapting the new technology and are wiling to
pay a premium over current offers."
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
What would you like to be able to do differently/better after this training?
• What specific skills on modeling would you like to improve?
• What would you like to do different next Monday?
• How would your coworkers/ clients/ boss notice the change?
The Four Key BCG Success Factors to get to "so what" 60 minutes
Break 15 minutes
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Exercises: Try it yourself! 60 minutes
1
Understand implications
• Get to the "so what" of the analysis you perform
2
Build an insightful, actionable recommendation
• Create and select your recommendation
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
3
Iterate if needed!
• Meet the burden of proof for what you are recommending
4
Avoid common biases and errors
• Steer clear of common pitfalls as you develop your answer
1
Understand implications
• Get to the "so what" of the analysis you perform
2
Build an insightful, actionable recommendation
• Create and select your recommendation
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
3
Iterate if needed!
• Meet the burden of proof for what you are recommending
4
Avoid common biases and errors
• Steer clear of common pitfalls as you develop your answer
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
the stakeholder No contract
with suppliers
4 Why?
A pragmatic tool to go beyond the
obvious and get to the "so what" is Drivers negotiate
the Five Whys contracts alone
• Use this to drill down further and 5 Why?
gain deeper insights
No central
procurement office
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
• What does this analysis mean?
Module • Why are the results of this analysis important?
• What are the next analyses/right options going forward?
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Delivery
563,184
• The drivers currently are using valuable truck
savings($)
capacity when selling product
If we remove the sales task from delivery … • The company may be able to reduce its truck
Time to fleet and drivers
serve (Min) Large Medium Small
Delivery 15 15 10
time—Merch. What are the next steps?
Delivery 15 10 5 • Look at potential cost of hiring a sales team
time—Picking • See if reducing driver count is an option
Delivery 0 0 0
time— • Investigate potential losses in sales
Client/Sales from change
Total 30 25 15
Delivery
2,206,330
savings($)
We can save about $1.64M in delivery costs by removing sales duties
from the truckers' tasks at a stop
1
Understand implications
• Get to the "so what" of the analysis you perform
2
Build an insightful, actionable recommendation
• Create and select your recommendation
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
3
Iterate if needed!
• Meet the burden of proof for what you are recommending
4
Avoid common biases and errors
• Steer clear of common pitfalls as you develop your answer
Limited insights, first level of implication Takes it to the next level, digs further
Informative but not actionable by itself Show the next steps and spurs stakeholder to
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
action
"Cheese revenue is down since last year.
Name Brand sales have decreased "The Store Brand is cannibalizing our other
significantly. However, our cheaper Store brands.
Brand's sales almost doubled since we By returning the Store Brand to its previous price,
lowered the price by 33%" this business owner will be able to improve
cheese revenue"
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lays out a definite plan • Leverage your team
• Gives the stakeholder precise steps rather • Consider your decisions in stakeholder
than context
• vague concepts • Look ahead to future consequences of
your recommendation
"Dairy Co. should reduce the driver and "Drivers waste 5–10 minutes on sales
truck count by eliminating the sales task when they serve stores."
from their drivers' responsibilities, • Actionable ✗
allowing drivers to serve 20% more • Specific ✓
stores." • Insightful ✗
• Actionable ✓
• Specific ✓
• Insightful ✓
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
"Dairy Co. should replace the driver sales "Dairy Co. could save $1.6MM by taking
task with a dedicated sales team. away the driver sales task and using a
Using specialists will generate delivery sales team instead."
savings and improve sales" • Actionable ✗
• Actionable ✓ • Specific ✓
• Specific ✓ • Insightful ✓
• Insightful ✓
1
Understand implications
• Get to the "so what" of the analysis you perform
2
Build an insightful, actionable recommendation
• Create and select your recommendation
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
3
Iterate if needed!
• Meet the burden of proof for what you are recommending
4
Avoid common biases and errors
• Steer clear of common pitfalls as you develop your answer
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Frame and structure Deliver high
Drive to insight
the problem quality analysis
Iterate if needed
"80/20 behavior"
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
You are not alone: Leverage your team meetings and peers
• Come with high-level analysis/data sample/preliminary answers
• Get colleagues to think with you: push from data, to insight, to recommendation
Example: Iterate!
Iterate!
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Sales team replacing Sales losses and team Driver count reduction
drivers would increase costs are $1M less than could improve profits
profits driver savings by $1M
Iterate!
Final recommendation: By removing the sales task from the drivers and creating a sales team to perform
all sales, business owner can save $700K annually from reduced truck and driver needs
1
Understand implications
• Get to the "so what" of the analysis you perform
2
Build an insightful, actionable recommendation
• Create and select your recommendation
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
3
Iterate if needed!
• Meet the burden of proof for what you are recommending
4
Avoid common biases and errors
• Steer clear of common pitfalls as you develop your answer
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Discussion: Examples of biases you may have encountered
"I spent a week analyzing data Sunk-cost bias "I spent a week looking at
without identifying anything to • Ignore sunk costs data and it looks like they
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
change. I need to spend more • It is okay to admit mistakes have industry-leading
time to find something practices. I should expand my
to suggest." work into other areas now."
"In my last case, the problem Anchoring bias "In my last case the problem
was related to the driver • Ask yourself if you are being was related to the driver
unloading time, I should unduly influenced by unloading time, I should keep
spend a week seeing if that's information that is recent it in mind as I work through
the problem here." or vivid the problem."
The Four Key BCG Success Factors to get to "so what" 60 minutes
Break 15 minutes
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Exercises: Try it yourself! 60 minutes
The Four Key BCG Success Factors to get to "so what" 60 minutes
Break 15 minutes
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Exercises: Try it yourself! 60 minutes
You will now receive slide handouts containing lots of data and analysis
Objective of this exercise: Translate this analysis into clear, actionable insights
• Craft a title that captures the 'so-what' of the slide
Way of working:
• Form pairs
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
• Per pair: choose 2 information sheets and transform them in to slides (20 minutes)
• Every group presents their slide (5 minutes) followed by group feedback (5 minutes)
Exercise 1
Client: PE fund
Write the title Case: Industry landscaping BCG case
context
+4.0%
CAGR C AGR
'0 4-'11 '11-'16
60 57
55
+4.5% 52 9% RoW +3. 9% +4. 5%
51 9%
49 9%
47 9% 8% I ndi a +13.2% +8.9%
42 45 9% 7%
40 43 9% 7% 9% A sia 2 +5.5% +5.4%
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
5% 7%
Lots of data
34 38 5% 9% 7% 9% .
d
36 4% 9% 9% 6% 9% 9% ve
40 4% 5% 6% 9% 10% L. Am erica +7. 8% +5.8%
r
e
4% 9% 9% 10% s
e
8% 9% 10% r
and analysis
9% 9% 10% ts
9% 8% 8% 10% 10% 9% Japan +0.2% +0. 4% h
9% 8% 9% 9% 10% 10% g
ri
8% 8% 9% 10% ll
8% 8% 11% 11% A
8% 12% 12% 12% .
c
14% 13% 17% 17% 18% China +13. 7% +6.9% n
I
14% 16% 16% ,
15% 12% 14% 15% 15% p
u
20 10% 11% o
r
9% 9% G
g
18% 18% 17% 17% 16% US +1.4% +0. 8% in
23% 22% 22% 21% 20% 19% tl
23% 23% su
n
o
C
n
23% 22% 22% 21% 21% 21% 21% 20% 20% 20% W . Europe +2. 3% +2. 8% o
st
25% 24% 24% o
B
0 e
h
T
y
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 b
4
1
0
2
©
1. Mar ke t for foods ervice equipme nt estimated by a pplying ave rage % equipme nt spend/ye ar to total foodse rvice f ood co st (includes bever ages) , which is the a va li a ble d ata f rom t
h
Dat amonitor . % equ ipment spen d/year calculate d b y taking straight line dep reciation of initial capex of vario us QSR food service establishm ents as a % of food cost (estim ated throu gh g
i
ry
annual repor ts and exper t inter views). FSR and cost-foo dservice %sp end appro xim ated at the lowest end of QSR's spend. Depreciat o i n: 7-8 yr s for QSR and F SR, 10-12 years for cost p
o
foodservice . Dema nd for '15 and '16 are extrap olated based on 11-'14 CAG R 2. Asia oth er t han Jap an, China, In dia C
Sour ce: Datam onitor Globa l Foo dservice Analyzer 2011, exper t inter views, BCG analysis
G e ttin g to th e s o wh a t-SL -S IN-1 3 Ap r2 0 14 .pp tx Dra ft—for discuss ion only 38
The Four Key BCG Success Factors to get to "so what" 60 minutes
Break 15 minutes
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Exercises: Try it yourself! 60 minutes
1
Understand implications
• Get to the "so what" of the analysis you perform
2
Build an insightful, actionable recommendation
• Create and select your recommendation
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
3
Iterate if needed!
• Meet the burden of proof for what you are recommending
4
Avoid common biases and errors
• Steer clear of common pitfalls as you develop your answer
What are the most important learnings from this training for me?
What will I do differently on my next data? How will others notice the change?
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
What could prevent me from making this a structural and What am I going to do to make sure this improvement will
lasting improvement? "stick"?
1 2 3 4 5
Hypothesis-Driven Modeling Structuring your Getting to the Leading effective
Problem Solving Analysis Message "So-What" meetings
Copyright © 2014 by The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
• Ensures focus: • Ensures analytic • Ensures clarity: • Ensures action: • Ensures impact:
Why
sets the right level of rigor: highlights the "so driving analysis to create and conduct
does it supports what", allowing to actionable insights effective meetings
detail for the right
matter topics hypotheses with decide and take
? logic and data action