Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United Nations Global Compact: Responsible Management Week 2
United Nations Global Compact: Responsible Management Week 2
United Nations Global Compact: Responsible Management Week 2
It is composed of ambassador’s from member countries 38 and the European commission and is chaired
by the secretary-general.
OECD MEMBERS
India is a partnership
- Redraft in 211
- Open to non- OECD MEMBERS
Expect the companies behave responsibly by identifying avoiding and addressing negative impacts that
they:
- Cause
- Contribute to
- Directly linked to through a business relation
Key tool: is supply chain and due diligence ( analyzing the issues)
2
RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT WEEK 2
Potential harm is different depending on the company( marketing skinny models used as reference).
Track performance- I am doing it right? I need to openly tell what did you do ( actions)
Companies should carry out due diligence to identify, avoid and address adverse impacts that they
cause, contribute to or to which they are directly linked through their business operations.
3
RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT WEEK 2
3- GOVERNMENT DIALOGUE
ILO
ILO- international labour organization: united nations agency dealing with labour issues
4
RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT WEEK 2
1919
Some communities need child labour to survive – we need to look what is forced and what is cultural
5
RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT WEEK 2
BENEFIT CORPORATION-D
Business that is legally taking the responsibility not only to pursue profit but also emission towards
planet, people…
Patagonia is an example.
The idea is to stay responsible in a long run- so they created this term.
First country was US ( Maryland) it is a state law ( only some certain states accepted).
Italy benefit corporation law ( second country) 2016 fist country outside the us
EXAMPLES
Patagonia
Danone
Treat because they say that the SDG’S are not strong enough.
7
RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT WEEK 2
In June 2014, the UNHRC adopted Resolution 26/9, in which it decided ‘to establish an open-ended
intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with
respect to human rights’ (OEIGWG).
Since 2018, the OEIGWG has annually released a draft version of a potential BHR ( Business human
rights. Treaty.
Why a trendy
UNGP’s failure to achieve access to justice
The necessity to adopt legally binding standards governing corporate conduct
toward human rights
The philosophical shift in international legal order vis-a-vis unchecked global
capitalism and corporate power
An international instrument appropriate for addressing Ryan’s national nature
of human rights abuse involving MNEs
Why not a trendy?
May weaken the consensus reached with the UNGPs and undermine the
implementation
Not trumpet effectively in dealing with the web of complex interrelationships
between business and human rights
The process with lack of consensus building
8
RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT WEEK 2
PRO BHR
The most prominent argument in favour of a BHR Treaty is the necessity to adopt legally binding
standards governing corporate conduct towards human rights.4
A BHR Treaty would ‘provide a clear recognition and articulation of the important normative position
that fundamental rights under international law impose legally-binding obligations upon businesses’
BHR Treaty is needed ‘to fill certain governance gaps left by existing regulatory initiatives, including the
[UNGPs]’
AGAINST BHR
The role of businesses in human rights abuse in treaty negotiations may weaken the consensus reached
with the UNGPs and undermine their implementation.6
Should the treaty apply to all types of business enterprises (ie transnational and domestic ones) or
should it be limited to transnational corporations only?
It has been argued that imposing obligations on businesses under international human rights law would
raise complex normative issues and would be difficult to enforce.
Finally, there have been concerns about the lack of political adherence to the BHR Treaty project.
A benefit corporation is a legal tool to create a solid foundation for long term mission alignment and
value creation. It protects company missions through capital raises and leadership changes, creates
more flexibility when evaluating potential sale and liquidity options, and prepares businesses to lead a
mission-driven life post-IPO.
HOW?
The OECD Centre for Responsible Business Conduct uses RBC standards and recommendations to shape
government policies and help businesses minimize the adverse impacts of their operations and supply
chains, while providing a venue for the resolution of alleged corporate, social, environmental, labour or
human rights abuses. Through RBC, businesses can make a positive contribution to economic growth and
development and become a powerful driver for achieving the SDGs
10