Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Welfare Model
Welfare Model
BY MIRIAM JESSON
Contents
1. Defining welfare 2. Welfare model 3. Areas of welfare model
y y y y y y y y y Child Development Youth Development Family Work Community Development Correctional Administration Welfare Administration Medical and Psychiatric: Weaker section Human Resource Management
4. Other welfare models of social work y Residual model y Institutional Model y Structural model
5. Conclusion 6. Bibliography
Welfare Model
Defining welfare:
Welfare refers to the economic well being of an individual, group, or economy. For individuals, it is conceptualized by a utility function. For groups, including countries and the world, it is a complex concept, since individuals fare differently. In trade theory, an improvement in welfare is often inferred from an increase in real national income.
Welfare Model
Welfare model is one of the models of social work. It is connected with the fields of social work like Community Development, Correctional Administration, Family and Child Welfare, Human Resource Management, Medical and Psychiatry and Youth Welfare. Depending on the need and problems of the target group these methods are applied.
youth. The educated youth or the youth who have not gone for formal education have to earn for their living to support their families. The youth population in any country is really significant at the same time unemployment is also high. This has resulted in lots of problems to the youth, to their families and to the society at large. Such a group desperately needs for professional guidance and assistance and also the various life coping skills or the soft skills, which are essential but not provided in the educational institutions. In this area there is enough scope to practice the various methods of social work.
(iv)Welfare model in Community Development: Community is where a group of people lives in a geographical area for a common purpose on a permanent basis. In any community there is always a disparity based on their social, economic, cultural, educational and political status. Due to the variation there is every possibility of dependency, inequality and exploitation within and between the communities. In such a situation there is a need for social work intervention by enabling and encouraging the community to identify its own needs, assess its magnitude, symptoms and causes give priorities and work out the strategy in addressing the problem.
individual. Such individuals may not be able to adjust and at times become social deviant and turned to be an anti-social. The juveniles and the young offenders are in need of assistance at the appropriate stage. The adults who are involved in undesired activities are also in need of professional assistance for which the social work welfare model would be of great use.
(i)Residual model:
The residual model focuses on supportive measures outside the labor market, which makes the means test a pivotal device in ensuring both minimum subsistence levels and the willingness to work. Measured by its income maintenance system the UK conforms to this model 'because the new middle classes were not wooed from the market to the state' (Esping-Andersen 1990: 31). The universalism once envisaged by Beveridge has given way to the dualism of state and market in insurance, housing, education and now also in the privatization of health and community care services. Personal social services, as the 'fifth social service' in the British welfare state, have experienced more than their fair share of the divisiveness characteristic of the residual model. Social workers' attention, in particular, remained focused almost exclusively on poor families and they inherited the last-resort image of the Poor Law as their mandate rarely extended to proactive, inclusive and universal initiatives. These remained the domain of the voluntary sector and of other professional groups such as youth workers. The recent preoccupation with child protection responsibilities has accentuated the social pathology orientation of British social work, which is itself perhaps the most direct result of the residual welfare concept within which it is made to operate, with statutory workers bearing the brunt of the political dilemma (Corby 1991: 102). They are not only made to draw the line between acceptable and unacceptable child rearing practices but also to weigh up the rights to citizenship between parents and children, without being able to command the resources that would secure the social rights of
both. Thus the residual framework is conducive to a more pronounced polarization of care and control. The state comes into evidence through controlling assessments and first-line interceptive functions, while non-statutory services can provide the caring. British social work has born the brunt of public criticism over child protection decisions precisely because it is associated so directly with a state that plays very ambiguously with the boundaries of social rights, relying more on coercion than on endorsing civil and social rights for social cohesion. Residual concept of social welfare sees state assistance as temporary, minimal, requiring evidence of need, and available only after all other avenues of help have been exhausted. The cause of need can play a role in defining a person in need
(ii)Institutional model:
An institutional system is one in which need is accepted as a normal part of social life. Welfare is provided for the population as a whole, in the same way as public services like roads or schools might be. In an institutional system, welfare is not just for the poor: it is for everyone. The institutional concept of welfare see social welfare programs as protecting individuals in society from the social costs of operating an industrialized capitalist market, rather than letting those costs fall on those who experience the risks of industrial society. Need is established based on the fact of need, without consideration of the cause of need.
(iii)Structural model:
Structural social work is part of a critical, progressive tradition that has been concerned with the broad socio-economic and political dimensions of society, especially the effects of capitalism, and the impact of these influences in creating unequal relations amongst individuals. Its primary goals have been to reduce social inequality through the transformation of Western, Euro-Centric civilizations and the emancipation of those who have been oppressed. The lens of this theoretical approach has been focused on the interplay between the agency of individuals and structures, particularly the broad structural barriers which influence and limit the material circumstances of service users. By structures, I am referring to social regularities and objective patterns external to individual action, intentions, and meanings and not reducible to the sum of those meanings or actions , specifically both institutional arrangements and broad social relational patterns such as racism and sexism. Structural theory argues that these arrangements serve those in power, allowing them to maintain their power and privilege at the expense of others. Structural social work theory begins from a conflict, rather than an order perspective. The theory regards society as composed of groups with conflicting interests who compete for resources, power, and the imposition of their own ideological views of the world. In this
perspective, social problems are more the result of defective rules which pathologies those who are marginalized and the consequence of institutional arrangements which maintain social hierarchies, rather than faulty socialization of individuals. In structural theory, the mechanisms of oppression and the internalization of falseconsciousness for marginalized groups were explored. Using the feminist notion of the personal is political, practitioners were expected to identify the processes by which victims were blamed, linking service users to the broader structures that led to their domination as well as connecting them to others with similar problems. Wood and Tully identified four main tactics for structural practitioners: 1) connecting people to needed resources, 2) changing social structures, where feasible, 3) helping service users negotiate problematic situations and 4) deconstructing sociopolitical discourse to reveal the relationship with individual struggles. Providing clients with insider information was an additional strategy suggested by structural theorists. Currently, structural theory has evolved to examine the transformation of capitalism, particularly the effects of globalization, and the shifts governmentally to increasingly neo-liberal agendas with the consequent effects on those most vulnerable in society. The view that structural theory can offer guidelines for animating political alliances and anti-globalization movements is part of that exploration.
1. Entitlement of individual vis--vis Basic minimum 2. The society collective responsibility 3. Mechanism for delivery of services 4. Range of programmes primarily curative minimum
largely voluntary state with voluntary efforts curative with emphasis On prevention
5. Coverage
only handicapped
low
equal with
others _
Conclusion:
Thus it could be stated that from the above details that the welfare model does not pertain to a particular aspect instead it has to have a check on all settings in the society. Basically the residual, institutional and structural models are the base for the welfare model. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------