Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proposing To Explain "How Good
Proposing To Explain "How Good
People
I perceived good and evil as common dichotomy until I watched Philip Zimbardo’s TED Talk.
How could such evil have been unleashed on the world, and how did it affect the people caught
up in it?
Zimbardo demonstrated this in the early 1970s when he carried out his infamous Stanford
Prison Experiment. The mock jail he set up in Stanford’s psychology building, where “guards”
abused “prisoners” with impunity, revealed the speed with which ordinary people can begin to
carry out depraved acts in a toxic environment. His insights into what he calls “situational evil”
have helped a variety of organizations take steps to prevent such abuses in the future.
When people with these types of dark traits signed up for a prison study and became prison
guards, they were surrounded by others who shared their tendencies, and they expressed
them. People “do not automatically assume roles given to them,” conclude the psychologists
Alexander Haslam and Stephen Reicher, after running their own prison experiment
with cooperation from the BBC. Rather, “particular individuals with particular beliefs make
tyranny possible.”
People were more likely to deliver painful shocks if they were authoritarian. The shockers were
also significantly more trusting of others (they assumed the scientist would do the right thing)
and used to following the lead of others (they believed life events were driven by external
forces like luck, chance, or fate, rather than internal forces like effort and willpower).
Bad people are more likely to opt into bad situations. When they band together, all too often,
evil is the result.