Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 47 views

    Vibar, Trexia Mae E. DMD-2A M3 Check-In ACTIVITY 4: With The Above

    Uploaded by

    Charlie Sumagaysay
    Scheler's hierarchy of values classifies values into four categories from lowest to highest: 1) pleasure and displeasure, 2) sense of life and welfare, 3) mental values like perception and beauty, and 4) holiness. The document discusses how Scheler's hierarchy provides a framework for judicial decision making, though different analysts may order values differently. The respondent identifies with Scheler's theory, believing one is morally right if their preferences align with his objective hierarchy and morally wrong if not.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Vibar, Trexia Mae E. DMD-2A M3 Check-In ACTIVITY 4: With The Above

    Uploaded by

    Charlie Sumagaysay
    47 views1 page
    Scheler's hierarchy of values classifies values into four categories from lowest to highest: 1) pleasure and displeasure, 2) sense of life and welfare, 3) mental values like perception and beauty, and 4) holiness. The document discusses how Scheler's hierarchy provides a framework for judicial decision making, though different analysts may order values differently. The respondent identifies with Scheler's theory, believing one is morally right if their preferences align with his objective hierarchy and morally wrong if not.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    M3_Check-In-Activity-4

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Scheler's hierarchy of values classifies values into four categories from lowest to highest: 1) pleasure and displeasure, 2) sense of life and welfare, 3) mental values like perception and beauty, and 4) holiness. The document discusses how Scheler's hierarchy provides a framework for judicial decision making, though different analysts may order values differently. The respondent identifies with Scheler's theory, believing one is morally right if their preferences align with his objective hierarchy and morally wrong if not.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    47 views1 page

    Vibar, Trexia Mae E. DMD-2A M3 Check-In ACTIVITY 4: With The Above

    Uploaded by

    Charlie Sumagaysay
    Scheler's hierarchy of values classifies values into four categories from lowest to highest: 1) pleasure and displeasure, 2) sense of life and welfare, 3) mental values like perception and beauty, and 4) holiness. The document discusses how Scheler's hierarchy provides a framework for judicial decision making, though different analysts may order values differently. The respondent identifies with Scheler's theory, believing one is morally right if their preferences align with his objective hierarchy and morally wrong if not.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    VIBAR, TREXIA MAE E.

    DMD-2A
    M3 Check-In ACTIVITY 4

    1. What is Scheler's hierarchy of values?


    Scheler classified the values into the following four categories (from the
    bottom to the top); (1) the value of pleasure and displeasure (the emotional value),
    (2) the value of the sense of life (and welfare as a subsidiary value to it), (3) the
    mental value (perception, beauty, justice), (4) the value of holiness.
    Scheler’s hierarchy of values refers to a set of social principles that guide
    judicial decision-making. Distinct jurists or legal analysts may place values in
    different hierarchies, causing them to reach different conclusions in different cases.

    Reference: 20th WCP: A Study on the Hierarchy of Values. (n.d.). Www.bu.edu.

    https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Valu/ValuMin.htm#:~:text=In%20accordance%20

    with%20the%20above

    2. Were you able to identify yourself with his theory? Why or why not?

    Yes. He is morally excellent if our preferences or actions accord to his


    objective hierarchy; otherwise, he is morally wrong.

    You might also like