International joint-ventures are an important area of study in strategic strategy and
international industry (IJV). International businesses have been careful in their attempts to enter the African market and have used IJVs to meet and operate on the market. The goal of this paper is to explore and evaluate the variables that affect the choice of post-IJV termination in the African context. The paper is based on the research published by Dhir & Mital & Dhir, 2018b, and White, Kitimbo, & Rees, 2018, in the International Business Review, October 2018, and published by The African Journal of International Business, 18 October 2018. The literature review describes seven essential factors that form the IJV partnership and have an effect on the option of post-IJV relationships that are interdependence, type of IJV, cultural gap, type of market, type of termination, partnering expertise and bargaining power. To assess the severity of the post-IJV interactive variables, TISM is used as a method for hierarchical factors and to classify their effect on the dependent variable—interaction judgment after IJV termination. TISM is a recent extension of interpretive structural modelling. It is used to create a hierarchical structure for a set of variables that affect a dependent factor. TISM is concerned with enhancing the complex structure of the graph between the sets of elements and variables. It allows the articulation of mental structures into a type that can be used to explain the effect of multiple variables on a dependent variable. In this approach, they use the variables found in the literature and are checked by practicing managers who have engaged in the finalized IJV based in Africa. From the TISM model, the type of market, type of closure, partnering expertise, bargaining power and interdependence have a direct effect on post-IJV engagement. Interdependence influences the bargaining power which is functional when the parent firm contribution in the IJV decides the value and ultimately the bargaining power, culture distance affects the form of termination, but it has an indirect effect on the decision to engage after IJV termination, the type of IJV affects the desiccation of interaction by interdependence. This study aims to examine the complexities of post-IJV termination in the Afican context as the number of IJV formations in Africa has risen over the last few years and IJV termination has also increased gradually, suggesting that practitioners can use their IJV skills to assess their future contact with the terminated IJV partner. Open innovation : Innovation has been generally characterized in which diverse resources are pooled. This integration of diverse tools is a multi-stage method leading to the improvement of new goods, services or systems. Traditionally, a heavy emphasis has been put on the economic success of innovation initiatives. Open innovation is the search and incorporation of additional expertise into the advancement of organizational innovation. The potential dangers of open innovation include loss of access, increased managerial and operational sophistication and, consequently, increased costs. We know very little about how companies innovate in external collaborations, make the most of their technologies and work with outside partners. This applies in the context of sustainability innovations leading to the need to re-think and re-design products, processes and services in order to address the demands of sustainable growth. The research explores the relevance of external partners to the achievement of EIP economic innovation success and SIP sustainability innovation performance. The paper explores the relationship between EIP and SIP in order to explain to managers whether all facets of production can be followed simultaneously or whether trade-offs can be induced. It reflects on addressing questions as to whether and how the relationship with external collaborators has affected the EIP and SIP of the company? And it has three theories that are Higher economic innovation output correlated with higher collaboration intensity with external partners, Higher sustainability innovation performance is associated with higher collaboration intensity with external partners, and sustainability innovation performance and economic innovation performance are positively linked. In order to test the suggested findings, a quantitative field sample study was carried out, including sampling of large and medium-sized Austrian companies. The survey comprised 152 references from 85 companies. EIP was calculated using six elements defined by Griffin and Page (1993) and Manion and Cherion (2009) Calculating the influence of the innovation projects carried out during the intervening three years on the economic efficiency of the innovation programme. The SIP has captured the extent to which the actions of the company's transformation initiative have improved its sustainability efficiency. They also tested the multi-item scale for validity and reliability. The internal consistency was tested by analyzing the Cronbach alpha coefficients. The unidimensional nature of the scales has been verified by the results of the main factor analyzes. Four-dimensional scores have been aggregated to assess the total SIP metric. The suggested relationships have been tested using a benchmarking methodology. Benchmarking is a method commonly used to identify success variables. This helps companies to define the practices to be implemented in order to improve their efficiency. To identify the benchmark group, we selected companies that fell to the top 20% of the EIP output measure. Benchmark companies will eventually be referred to as benchmark firms. The same technique was extended to the SIP.The scores of the benchmark firm were aggregated for each element. In addition, in order to check the benchmark findings and to test the relationship between SIP and EIP, we examined the relationship between open innovation activities and performance measures by estimating the Pearson correlations. The benchmark findings referred to in the EIP reveal that the gap between the top and the low-performers is very high on average. The largest disparities in financial results can be established by reducing the discrepancies between the customer loyalty obtained and the image advantage. The EIP benchmark group has worked more intensively with most of the innovation partners than the lower-performance firms, with the exception of rivals and specialists. The data include partial evidence for Hypothesis 1 for user groups, universities and NGOs. Companies with the highest degree of SIP efficiency work more extensively with each partner than their low-performance counterparts. Five out of nine correlations between management strategies and success have been statistically important. The data provide limited evidence for Hypothesis 2 for cooperation classes such as clients, universities, intermediaries, NGOs and, with restrictions, competitors. However, no substantial correlations have been established with respect to the remaining partners (suppliers, consultants, municipalities and public institutions). These findings reinforce the idea that sustainability innovations are challenging and that most businesses have sustainability innovations. Supporting Hypothesis 3, the study showed a positive and important association between EIP and SIP. This includes the promotion of economic and development. Researchers looked at how cooperation with external collaborators had an effect on EIP and SIP. They felt it important to include all collaborators directly connected to the business, such as clients or universities, and other stakeholders in the wider ecosystem. For bosses, this means that goals that seem to be divergent at first glance may be accomplished, they claim. However, this analysis still has drawbacks, and more research is required to validate the results, the authors note. The results outlined in this paper have opened up substantial doors for potential research, and it will be useful to examine how the factors of the company affect internal adoption and incorporate them.