Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The 6 Earliest Qur'Anic Manuscripts: (I) Manuscript Criticism
The 6 Earliest Qur'Anic Manuscripts: (I) Manuscript Criticism
The 6 Earliest Qur'Anic Manuscripts: (I) Manuscript Criticism
Learning objective:
• To better understand the historical problems of the Qur’an
• To investigate the 6 earliest extant manuscripts
• To look at the many corrections
• To come to conclusions concerning when the Qur’an was written
• To assess who then could have written it, and why
Tony [Costa] pointed out that we have a copy of the Qur’an dating from 790 in the British Museum
(MS2165 Ma’il Codice). Folks, that’s 1,300 years ago. And we can compare that with what we’re
reading today and we find them to be exactly identical.”
“But what is important to notice is that throughout the ages of Muslim history, the Muslims have not
quarreled over what is the text of the Qur’an because the text was known through memory work
and through the written materials handed down right from the time of the prophet Muhammad,
peace and blessings of God be upon him. As I said, the two copies that were made 1,400 years ago,
one which is in Tashkent, Russia, for example, has been demonstrated by Ahmad von Denffer in his
book Ulum Al-Qur’an to be an early copy from that time, and we find no difference from that copy to
what we’re reading today”
• “One of the most important questions of Qur'anic history is the whereabouts of the
Mushafs attributed to Caliph 'Uthman and whether any of them reached the present
day. Unfortunately, we do not have a positive answer to this question” (Prof. Dr.
Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, “Al-Mushaf al-Sharif Attributed to ‘Uthman bin ‘Affan”,
2007:35)
• “Judging from its illumination, the Topkapi Museum Muṣḥaf dates neither from the
period when the Muṣḥafs of the Caliph ‘Uthmān were written nor from the time
when copies based on those Muṣḥafs were written” (İhsanoğlu, ‘Al-Mushaf al-Sharif’
2007:10)
• “This, Muṣḥaf, which we proudly present, does not constitute a sample of the early
period of Muṣḥaf writing due to a number of characteristics, namely its illumination,
calligraphy which shows the development of the Arabic script to a certain extent, the
fact that the words appear on straight lines, the proportion between the letters,
diacritic marks of i‘rāb in the form of dots in red ink, and the signs of i‘jam in the form
of thin slant lines differentiating similar letters from one another in black ink, with
which the text is written. Considering its dimensions and style of illumination, this
Muṣḥaf most probably belongs to the [later] Umayyad period.” (İhsanoğlu, ‘Al-
Mushaf al-Sharif’ 2007:13)
Note: Of the 43 Surahs only 1 is complete, 24 are partially complete, and 18 have nothing written!
• Hijazi Script
• Only up to Surah 43
LOWER TEXT = Mid – late 7th century (50 years older than the upper text)
The Claims:
• The Qur’an is eternal
• Sent down from heaven
• Untouched by Human hands
• Thus, no corrections, no corruptions
• So that the Qur’an we have now is exactly like that in heaven, sent to Muhammad,
and compiled by Uthman
For his PhD thesis in 2014, Dr Brubaker looked at the 6 earliest Qur’anic Manuscripts, as well as 4
other Manuscripts which appeared soon after.
• INSERTIONS - A POST PRODUCTION ADDITION TO A TEXT (390)
• TAPINGS – A PATCH APPEARS TO BE SERVING SOME OTHER PURPOSE THAN THE REPAIR
OF THE PAGE ITSELF
I CONCLUDE: Since Muslims CANNOT PROVE that there are ANY COMPLETE MANUSCRIPTS from the
time of Uthman (despite claims about the Topkapi & the Sammarqand)
1) The Qur'an is NOT ETERNAL
2) Was NOT SENT DOWN
3) Was NOT COMPLETE in 650 AD
4) NOT THE SAME, it HAS BEEN CHANGED
Thus, since the above ‘4’ are proven, then… Muhammad had little to do with the Qur’an!
…SO, WHO THEN CREATED THE QUR’AN?!!
[III] BIRMINGHAM QUR’ANIC FOLIOS
The Claims:
• The Qur’an is eternal
• Sent down from heaven
• Completed in 650 - 652 AD
• Thus, nothing was written earlier
• And all which comes later is derived from this first canonized ‘Uthmanic’ Mushaf
Carbon dating:
The deterioration of the Carbon only begins
when the animal was slaughtered, as they stop
taking in carbon 14 at that point, and begin to
decay into a Nitrogen-14 form. The half-life of
Carbon 14 is 5,730 years. When compared to a
fresh sample we can get the approximate date of
the parchment.
Surah 19:98 = Syriac works the Proto-Evangelium of James and the Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew
Surah 20:1-39 = story of Moses
c) OTHER Dating? - C14 FOR DAM 01-27-1 (Sana’a MSS)
Palimpsest of the codex Sana’a DAM 01-27-1 (Sotheby's 1993/Standford 2007) in Arizona
(Accelerator Mass Spectrometry lab)
• C14
68% 614-656AD
95% 578-669AD
(s2:265-286)
SUMMATION
1. Problems concerning the Qur’an’s compilation
2. Further Difficulties: Recitations, Sequences, Collections, and Grammar
3. The Satanic verses problem
4. Historical Anachronisms
5. Source Criticism
6. Manuscript Criticism
7. Corrections
8. Qur’anic Folios
CONCLUSION:
Since Muslims CANNOT PROVE that there are ANY COMPLETE MANUSCRIPTS from the time of
Uthman (despite claims about the Topkapi & the Sammarqand)
BUT, WHAT ABOUT OUR ‘WORD OF GOD’, WHO BECAME FLESH, AND DWELT AMONG US?
THE LOGOS (JOHN 1) = JESUS!
• Is Jesus ETERNAL?
• Was Jesus SENT DOWN?
• Is Jesus COMPLETE?
• Is Jesus UNCHANGED?
WE HAVE WHAT THEY ARE LOOKING FOR… AND HIS NAME IS JESUS!