Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Everbright Greentech Research Report 05.12.21
Everbright Greentech Research Report 05.12.21
May-2017
May-2018
May-2019
May-2020
Sep-2019
Sep-2017
Sep-2018
Sep-2020
Jan-2018
Jan-2019
Jan-2020
Jan-2021
identify opportunities around the market on a highly selective basis. As a result, the
Company has expanded into the end-of-life tyres disposal business to enrich its
business portfolio.
• During the year, the Company secured 17 new projects and entered into 4
supplemental agreements involving total investments of RMB2.56bn and Dividend yield
environmental remediation contracts worth RMB289m.
• As of December 2020, the Company had 119 environmental protection projects with 7.00%
6.00%
total investment of approx. RMB31.47bn and had undertaken 36 environmental
5.00%
remediation projects with a total contract of RMB1.014bn.
4.00%
• In terms of project construction, the Company continued to ensure steady progress as
3.00%
28 projects are currently under construction with 20 projects completed in 2020 alone.
2.00%
Currently, there are 34 projects under construction.
1.00%
• In 2020, construction revenues from operations declined by 9% while operating
0.00%
services from the same segments grew by 22%.
May-2018
May-2017
May-2019
May-2020
Sep-2017
Sep-2018
Sep-2019
Sep-2020
Jan-2018
Jan-2019
Jan-2020
Jan-2021
Operating stiatics under the biomass utilization segment (the main segment):
Operating statistics 2017 2018 2019 2020 CAGR//Avg
On-grid electricity (GW) 1,393 2,557 3,827 5,366 56.7%
Biomass raw mat processing vol
1,685 3,160 4,636 6,708 58.5%
(000 tonnes)
Waste processing vol (000 tonnes) 249 881 1,440 2,272 108.9%
Volume of steam supplied (000
171 363 819 1,344 98.8%
tonnes)
Cash flows shows distributions are funded solely through debt and equity
FCFE (HKD mns) 2017 2018 2019 2020
Cash flows from operations (80) (241) (138) (888)
Cash flows from investing (2,867) (2,370) (4,279) (3,263)
Debt issuance 1,936 3,244 6,309 7,761
FCFE (1,011) 633 1,892 3,610
Distributions - (310) (300) (339)
Excess / (Deficit) (1,011) 324 1,592 3,271
Cumulative balance (1,011) (688) 904 4,175
Segment information:
Revenue breakdown:
HKD in billions 2017 2018 2019 2020
Biomass utilization projects 3,994 5,862 7,270 8,318
Solid waste treatment projects 379 782 1,518 1,158
Environment remediation projects - 118 287 168
Solar energy and wind power projects 209 240 204 191
Total 4,581 7,002 9,280 9,835
Segment EBITDA
HKD in millions 2017 Margin 2018 Margin 2019 Margin 2020 Margin
Biomass utilization projects 1,143 28.6% 1,632 22.4% 2,193 30.2% 2,557 30.7%
Solid waste treatment projects 241 63.8% 370 24.4% 572 37.7% 420 36.2%
Environment remediation projects (3) N/A 25 8.5% 55 19.3% 39 23.4%
Solar energy and wind power projects 196 93.6% 226 110.5% 186 90.9% 181 94.9%
Total 1,578 34.4% 2,252 24.3% 3,006 32.4% 3,198 32.5%
Financial Analysis and Peer Analysis
Income Statement (HKD mns) 2017 2018 2019 2020 CAGR/Avg
Operating revenues 4,581 7,002 9,280 9,835 29.0%
Biomass utilization projects 3,994 5,862 7,270 8,318 27.7%
Solid waste treatment projects 379 782 1,518 1,158 45.2%
Environment remediation projects - 118 287 168 19.4%
Solar energy and wind power projects 209 240 204 191 -3.0%
Operating expenses (3,383) (5,289) (6,967) (7,375) 29.7%
Direct costs (3,146) (4,932) (6,479) (6,824) 29.4%
Administrative expenses (237) (357) (488) (551) 32.5%
Operating income 1,198 1,713 2,313 2,461 27.1%
Other operating income/expenses (11) (44) (203) (535) 270.4%
Other income 115 158 173 9 N/A
Interest expense (126) (202) (377) (544) 63.0%
Operating profit 1,188 1,668 2,109 1,926 17.5%
Taxes (230) (337) (462) (413) 21.5%
Net Income 957 1,331 1,647 1,513 16.5%
Financial Commentary:
• Revenues and EBITDA grew by 6% and 7%, respectively. Excluding the effect of a one-
off impairment in intangible assets, profit attributable to equity owners grew by 3% in Direct cost ratio
2020. 71.0%
• Growth in revenue is in line with ongoing increase in volumes of on-grid electricity 70.5%
through integrated biomass utilization, household waste processed and steam
70.0%
supplied.
• The decline in net income were mainly due to a supplementary circular in which certain 69.5%
projects will not be entitled to the renewable energy tariff subsidy when operation 69.0%
period exceeds prescribed lifetime operation hours. 68.5%
• In light of this, Management conservatively provisioned an impairment assessment on
68.0%
its intangible assets, PPE and ROU assets and recognized a one-off expense of
HKD162.5 (after-tax effect). 67.5%
2017 2018 2019 2020
• Profit under the biomass utilization segment increased by 10% is due to substantial
increase in revenues from operation services in tandem with the continuous growth in
total on-grid electricity from projects in operation.
• Profit under the hazardous and solid waste treatment segment declined by 44% due to
the decrease in revenue from operation services as the processing volume had been
affected by the pandemic.
• Profit under the environmental remediation segment declined by over 50% in 2020
due to the impact of the pandemic on construction work progress and reduction in
government tenders.
Peer Comparison
Peer analysis EV/EBITDA P/E D/E ratio Dividend yield
Canvest Environmental Protection Group Company8.7x
Limited (SEHK:1381)
12.5x 1.2x 2.1%
eREX Co.,Ltd. (TSE:9517) 12.1x 26.1x 1.5x 0.9%
China Datang Corporation Renewable Power Co., Limited
8.2x (SEHK:1798)
10.9x 2.0x 2.1%
CECEP Solar Energy Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:000591) 11.4x 22.3x 1.5x 1.9%
Beijing Enterprises Clean Energy Group Limited (SEHK:1250)
10.9x 15.3x 2.3x -
Xinyi Energy Holdings Limited (SEHK:3868) 15.6x 34.8x 0.2x 4.4%
Average peers 11.2x 20.3x 1.5x 2.3%
Everbright Greentech 6.5x 4.8x 1.3x 4.6%
Recommendation
Given the fundamentals of Everbright, I suggest a HOLD recommendation based on the following
key points:
• When normalizing its earnings for one-off expenses, profit grew by around 3% in 2020,
driven by higher volume and operating revenues from its main segment, biomass
utilization.
• The one-off expense related to an impairment of its intangible assets, following a
circular in which they will not be granted a subsidy on its tariff when operation period
exceeds prescribed lifetime operation hours. This may have further negative
implication on its future outlook.
• Excessive debt and cash flows dependent on debt and equity to fund its normal
operations on a year to year basis is risky in itself. Although not entirely a negative, it’s
definitely a red flag, especially when the time comes when the Company will have to
pay off its debt.
Submitted by: RS