MEANS OF VERIFICATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS
LEADING 1.1. Communicated the Outstanding
STRATEGICALLY DepEd vision, mission and Documentation of six (6) activities conducted within the year with the corresponding
(5) proofs of the modality used
core values to the wider
school community to Very Satisfactory Documentation of five (5) activities conducted within the year with the corresponding
ensure shared (4) proofs of the modality used
understanding and
Quality

alignment of school Satisfactory Documentation of four (4) activities conducted within the year with the corresponding
policies, programs, projects (3) proofs of the modality used
and activities
Unsatis factory Documentation of three (3) activities conducted within the year with the
(2) corresponding proofs of the modality used
Poor Documentation of one (1) to two (2) activities conducted within the year with the
(1) corresponding proofs of the modality used
Presence of any five (5) of the listed MOVs for each of the conducted activity:
1. Memo
2. Minutes
3. Photo Documentation
4. Attendance Sheets
5. Proof of Distribution of Print Materials
Outstanding 6. Screenshots of Online Announcement
(5) 7. Tarpaulin
8. Letter Request for Radio Timeslot stamped "Received"
9. Link of Video Clips
Efficiency

10. Letter of Invitation to Stakeholders stamped "Received"

Presence of any four (4) of the listed MOVs for each of the conducted activity
Very Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory Presence of any three (3) of the listed MOVs for each of the conducted activity
Basic Education Services

(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of any one or two (1 or 2) of the listed MOVs for each of the conducted
(2) activity

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
1.2. Developed and Presence of the listed MOVs:
implemented with the 1. Copy of approved AIP
planning team school plans 2. Accomplishment Report with documentation signed by the School Project
aligned with institutional Management Team (PMT) noted by the school head
goals and policies 3. Signed Quarterly M&E Report signed by the PMT and noted by the school head
4. Signed Project Workplan and Budget Matrix per PPA;
5. Memorandum on the conduct of AIP Adjustment/Annual Performance Review is
available;
6. Received copy of the letter of invitation sent to identified participants in the AIP
Adjustment/Annual Performance Review such as the school head and team, SPT,
PT, and support staff, with at least 3 community stakeholders is available;
7. received copy of designation papers of the SPT, PT, and support staff;
Outstanding
documentation/minutes of the orientation meeting with photos/videos; draft
(5) development guide formulated in consultation with community stakeholders;
8. Attendance sheet showing presence of community stakeholders throughout the
duration of the AIP Adjustment/Annual Performance Review;
9. Terms of reference indicating stakeholders leadership role in the AIP
Quality

Adjustment/Annual Performance Review;

10. Documentation report showing the actual preparation of the AIP process and
formulation of AIP documents;
11. Copy of approved BE-LCP

Very Satisfactory Presence of MOV 1 to 10

(4)
Satisfactory Presence of MOV 1 to 7
(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of MOV 1 to 4
(2)
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Outstanding 100% of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed
(5)
Very Satisfactory 91-99% of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed
(4)
Efficiency

Satisfactory 81-90% of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/complemeted

(3)
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Efficiency
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS

Unsatis factory 71-80% of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed
(2)
Poor 70%and below of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed
(1)
Outstanding Conducted 4 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team (SPT) and Project
(5) Management Team (PMT)

Very Satisfactory Conducted 3 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team (SPT) and Project
(4) Management Team (PMT)

Timeliness
Satisfactory Conducted 2 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team (SPT) and Project
(3) Management Team (PMT)
Unsatis factory Conducted 1 quarterly meeting with the School Planning Team(SPT) and Project
(2) Management Team (PMT)
Poor No quarterly meeting conducted
(1)
1.3. Utilized available 1. At least one (1) accomplished and signed M&E tool to track and evaluate each
monitoring and of the enumerated PPAs plus Memorandum, invitation, attendance sheet showing
evaluation processes and the review of AIP;
tools to promote learner 2. List of SIP Monitoring team;
achievement 3. Approved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP;
4. Summary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments to
Outstanding improve the plan;
(5) 5. Mid-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports;
6. Revised SIP/AIP incorporating the comments and suggestions and
recommendations;
7. Documentations with pictures showing the stakeholders as the lead facilitators
in the reviewing and improving the Development Plan (e.g. SIP)

1. At least one (1) accomplished and signed M&E tool to track and evaluate each
of the enumerated PPAs plus Memorandum, invitation, attendance sheet showing
the review of AIP;
2. List of SIP Monitoring team;
3. Approved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP;
Very Satisfactory 4. Summary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments to
(4) improve the plan;
5. Mid-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports;
Basic Education Services

6. Revised SIP/AIP incorporating the comments and suggestions and

recommendations;
Quality

1. At least one (1) accomplished and signed M&E tool to track and evaluate two
(2) of the enumerated PPAs plus any three (3) of the folllowing: Memorandum,
invitation, attendance sheet showing the review of AIP;
2. List of SIP Monitoring team;
Satisfactory 3. Approved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP;
(3) 4. Summary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments to
improve the plan;
5. Mid-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports

1. At least one (1) accomplished and signed M&E tool to track and evaluate two
(2) of the enumerated PPAs plus any three (3) of the folllowing: Memorandum,
invitation, attendance sheet showing the review of AIP;
2. List of SIP Monitoring team;
Unsatis factory 3. Approved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP;
(2) 4. Summary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments to
improve the plan;
5. Mid-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports

1. Any one(1) of the following: Memorandum, invitation, attendance sheet showing

the review of AIP; List of SIP Monitoring team;
2. Approved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP;
Poor
3. Summary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments to
(1) improve the plan;
4. Mid-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports

Outstanding Utilized DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools in all quarters

(5)
Very Satisfactory Utilized DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools in three quarters
(4)
Timeliness

Satisfactory Utilized DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools in two quarters

(3)

Unsatis factory Utilized DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools in a quarter

(2)

Poor No acceptable evidence was shown

(1)
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS
2. MANAGING 2.1. Managed school data Submission of all of the following online/offline reports:
SCHOOL and information using Online Reports:
OPERATIONS AND technology, including ICT to 1. Learner Information System (Early enrolment, QC,BOSY, EOSY) (to be
RESOURCES ensure efficient and provided by the Planning Unit)
effective school operations. 2. Wash in School (WinS)rating
3. Monthly DPDS Report (Partnership)
4. School eSAT summary (first and fourth phases)
5. RPMS Cycle Uploads
6. Brochure and booklet-type e-School Report Card (EOSY)
Outstanding
7. Generated acknowledgment receipt of the Uploaded SMEA Report per quarter
(5)
(for discussion during the orientation re generating the report)
8. LR Reports
Offline Reports:
1. PSIPOP

Quality
2. SF4
3. Updated School Form 7

Very Satisfactory Absence of one (1) to two (2) evidences of required reports
(4)
Satisfactory Absence of three (3) to four (4) evidences of required reports
(3)

Unsatis factory Absence of five (5) to six (6)evidences

(2)
Basic Education Services

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
At least five (5) evidences of both online and offline learners and school reports: 1.
Outstanding LIS 2. EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS 5. eSAT 6. IPCRF/OPRCF online link
(5) submission
At least 4 evidences of both online and offline learners and school reports: 1. LIS 2.
Very Satisfactory EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS 5. eSAT 6. IPCRF/OPRCF online link submission
(4)
Efficiency

At least 3 evidences of both online and offline learners and school reports: 1. LIS 2.
Satisfactory EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS 5. eSAT 6. IPCRF/OPRCF online link submission
(3)

At least 2 evidences of both online and offline learners and school reports: 1. LIS 2.
Unsatis factory EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS 5. eSAT 6. IPCRF/OPRCF online link submission
(2)

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
Outstanding Submitted all the reports on or before the deadline
(5)
Very Satisfactory Submitted one (1) to two (2) evidences of reports after the deadline
(4)
Timeliness

Satisfactory Submitted three (3) to four (4) evidences of reports after the deadline
(3)
Submitted five (5) to six (6) evidences of reports after the deadline
Unsatis factory
(2)

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
2.2. Managed finances
adhering to policies,
guidelines and issuances in
allocation, procurement, Presence of all of the listed MOVs:
disbursement and 1. Cash Disbursement Reports / Liquidation Reports MOOE and other funds
liquidation aligned with (containing BAC Resolution)
school plan. 2. Certification of MOOE utilization from the accounting office
Outstanding 3. Utilization of other financial resources/grants/assistance/donations based on the
(5) SIP/AIP/SRC or (any of the following)
3. 1. PTA audited financial report signed by the president, treasurer and auditor with
attached proof of expenses
3. 2. Financial Report of LGU donations
Quality

3. 3. Financial report on Alumni association

3. 4. Financial report on school produce
3. 5. Financial report on Brigada Eskwela donations with deed of donations
4. Updated Transparency Board/Information Board
Very Satisfactory
(4) Absence of one (1) of the listed MOVs
Satisfactory
(3) Absence of two (2) of the listed MOVs
Basic Education Services

Unsatis factory
(2) Absence of three (3) of the listed MOVs
Poor
(1) No acceptable evidence presented
Outstanding Utilization and liquidation reports of the 96-100% of the MOOE and of other funds
(5)
certified by Accounting Unit
Very Satisfactory Utilization and liquidation reports of the 91-95% of the MOOE and/ or other funds
(4)
certified by Accounting Unit
Efficiency

Satisfactory Utilization and liquidation reports of the 86-90% of the MOOE and/ or other funds
(3)
certified by Accounting Unit
Basic Education Ser PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Efficiency
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS

Unsatis factory Utilization and liquidation reports reports of the 81-85% MOOE and/ or other funds
(2)
certified by Accounting Unit
Poor Utilization and liquidation reports reports of the 80% and below of the MOOE and/ or
(1) other funds certified by Accounting Unit
Outstanding Record of the utilization and liquidation of the MOOE and/or other funds for the four
(5) quarters
Very Satisfactory Record of the utilization and liquidation of the MOOE and/or other funds for the

Timeliness
(4) three quarters
Satisfactory Record of the utilization and liquidation of the MOOE and/or other funds for the two
(3) quarters
Unsatis factory Record of the utilization and liquidation of the MOOE and/or other funds for one
(2) quarter
Poor No utilization of the MOOE and/or other funds
(1)
2.3. Managed school Presence of all of the following evidences:
facilities and equipment in 1. Annual Inventory report of school facilities
adherence to policies, 1. a. school buildings: classrooms and laboratories
guidelines and issuances 1. b. equipment (Science, TLE/TVL, Math, etc.) with property stickers
on acquisition, recording, 1. c. computer sets and printers with property stickers
neutralization, repair and 1. d. tables and chairs with property stickers
maintenance, storage and 1. e. handwashing facilities
disposal. 1. f. toilets
1. g. furniture
2. Books and other learning materials
2. 1. Inventory of Books
2.2 Inventory of TGs
2. 3. Inventory of LGs
2. 4. Inventory of IMs
Outstanding 3. List of Donations
(5) 3. 1. School Facilities
3.2. Books and other learning materials
4. Repair and maintenance/upkeeping of school physical structures and facilities
(pictures of before, during and after repair)
5. Structured classrooms, comfort rooms, ICT lab/room, directory, stage 6.
Quality

Presence of segregated waste facilities

7. Functional health facilities
8. Logbook of utilization of school equipment
9. Disposal/demolition report, if any
10. Site Development Plan
11. Site Acquisition/Titling or any action/move for titling

Absence of one (1) of the listed MOVs

Very Satisfactory
(4)
Absence of two (2) of the listed MOVs
Satisfactory
(3)
Absence of three (3) of the listed MOVs
Unsatis factory
(2)

Poor Absence of four (4) or more of the listed MOVs

(1)
Outstanding Evidences/documentation as to the updating (as of December 31, 2021) of 100% of th
(5)
Very Satisfactory Evidences/documentation as to the updating of 90% of the reports required stamped
Basic Education Services

(4)
Efficiency

Satisfactory Evidences/documentation as to the updating of 80% of the reports required stamped

(3)
Unsatis factory Evidences/documentation as to the updating of 70% of the reports required stamped
(2)
Poor Evidences/documentation as to the updating of 60% and below of the reports require
(1)
3. FOCUSING ON 3.1. Assisted teachers in a. TA plan approved by the PSDS
TEACHING AND the review, b. copy of contextualized lessons per quarter such as learning activity sheets, SLMs,
LEARNING contextualization and and worksheets reviewed by the SH
implementation of learning b.1. Mega School – at least 20
standards to make the b.2. Large School – at least 16
curriculum relevant for the Outstanding b.3. Medium School – at least 12
learners (5) b.4. Small School – at least 8
c. photo-documentation of the utilization of the contextualized lessons,
d. quarterly inventory of TA outputs. District stamped TA reports (narrative report,
pictures, samples) showing TA provision

a. TA plan approved by the PSDS

b. copy of contextualized lessons per quarter such as learning activity sheets, SLMs,
and worksheets reviewed by the SH
b.1. Mega School – at least 16
Very Satisfactory b.2. Large School – at least 12
(4) b.3. Medium School – at least 8
b.4. Small School – at least 4
c. photo-documentation of the utilization of the contextualized lessons,
d. quarterly inventory of TA outputs. District stamped TA reports (narrative report,
pictures, samples)
Quality
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS

Quality
a. TA plan approved by the PSDS
b. copy of contextualized lessons per quarter such as learning activity sheets, SLMs,
and worksheets reviewed by the SH
b.1. Mega School – at least 12
b.2. Large School – at least 8
Satisfactory
b.3. Medium School – at least 4
(3)
b.4. Small School – at least 2
c. photo-documentation of the utilization of the contextualized lessons,
d. quarterly inventory of TA outputs. District stamped TA reports (narrative report,
pictures, samples)

a. TA plan approved by the PSDS

b. copy of contextualized lessons per quarter such as learning activity sheets, SLMs,
and worksheets reviewed by the SH
b.1. Mega School – at least 8
Unsatis factory b.2. Large School – at least 4
(2) b.3. Medium School – at least 2
b.4. Small School – only 1
c. photo-documentation of the utilization of the contextualized lessons,
d. quarterly inventory of TA outputs. District stamped TA reports (narrative report,
pictures, samples)
Poor Absence of any of the non negotiable indicators
(1)
Presence of all of the following:
1. Documentation Report/Certificates of Participation in workshops to localize the
curriculum
2. Local Heritage Matrix/Local Heritage Materials
3. Contextualized Curriculum Matrix per learning area
4. Inventory of localized and indigenized teaching and learning materials
5. Organized School Level Learning Resource Evaluators
6. Evaluation Tools for localized Learning Resources
7. Record of utilization of downloaded materials from the LR portal
Outstanding 8. Record of the quality assured locally-developed LRs utilized at the school,
(5) district, division level
9. Functional school library/LRC/mobile library/library corner/classroom mini-
libraries
10. Monitoring report of the of the localized curriculum
Efficiency

11. Records of locally-developed LRs published in the LR portal/printed, published

or widely-circulated
12. Report/record of community engagement/program/extension services/immersion
in communities

Presence of MOV 1 to 10
Very Satisfactory
(4)

Presence of MOV 1 to 6
Satisfactory
(3)

Unsatis factory Presence of MOV 1 to 3

(2)
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Outstanding Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 3 days after a month
(5)
Very Satisfactory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 4-5 days after a month
(4)
Timeliness

Satisfactory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 6-7 days after a month
(3)
Unsatis factory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 8-9 days after a month
(2)
Basic Education Services

Poor Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 10 days after a month
(1)
3.2. Utilized learning 1. Enrolment Data by ALL Type of learners
outcomes in developing 2. Assessment Tools and Database of Assessment Results Diagnostric Tools MFAT
data-based interventions to (SPED) ECD Checklist (Elem)Reading Inventory Numeracy Language Mapping
3. Report on the Analysis of Assessment results: NAT (if applicable), Teacher-made tests
maintain learner
(with TOS), Other Summative Assessment Results (least learned skills and performance gaps)
achievement and attain 4. Availability of CGs, TGs. LMs, etc. for other types of learners : Students with special
other performance needs (if applicable), IPs, Muslim Learners (if applicable), ALS Modules (if applicable),
indicators Modules for ADM (Open High School, MISOSA, Home Schooling (if applicable)
5. Supervisory Plan, Instructional Supervision Report
6. Action plans, accomplishment, documentation reports on implementation of programs
and projects that address learners’ needs (submitted & received by the district/SDO)
7. Intervention action plans, M&E Reports, accomplishment, documentation reports on
implementation of initiated PAPs
8. Documentation report of LAC Sessions
9. Intervention Reports (e.g. SIM, Actions Research, Best Practice)
Outstanding 10. School rewards/awards program
(5) 11. Instructional monitoring report/anecdotal report/other proofs of monitoring
12. Results of Academic Contests, Awards, Certificates of Commendation received
13. School Paper, website/PLNs or other means to showcase best practices
14. Report of Participation of students and teachers in activities outside the school
Quality

15. Documentation that the school has been benchmarked (Logbook, Letter of Appreciation,
etc.)
 Quality
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS
Very Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 11
(4)
Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 6
(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of items 1 to 3
(2)
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Sample of validated intervention/materials accomplished by the learner in 8 or more
Outstanding learning areas
(5)

Very Satisfactory Sample of validated intervention/materials accomplished by the learner in 6-7

Efficiency
(4) learning areas
Satisfactory Sample of validated intervention/materials accomplished by the learner in 4-5
(3) learning areas
Unsatis factory Sample of validated intervention/materials accomplished by the learner in 1-3
(2) learning areas
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
3.3. Provided TA to Copy of coaching/mentoring form signed by the coached and the coach, issued
teachers in using learning school memo on the conduct of said activity, SDS-approved INSET proposal and/or
assessment tools, SDS-approved L and D plan (including LAC Sessions)
strategies and results 2. Copy of agreement form signed by the SH and teacher, sample of validated
consistent with curriculum contextualized assessment tool.
requirements to ensure 3. Accomplished COT
accountability in achieving a. Mega School – 8 per quarter
higher learning outcomes b. Large School – 6 per quarter
c. Medium School - 4 per quarter
d. Small School – 2 per quarter
Outstanding 4. Any five (5) of the following acceptable evidences/MOVs:
(5) a. attendance sheet
b. sample copy of validated assessment tool
c. sample of test item analysis,
d. sample of lesson design on least mastered competencies,
e. sample of authentic assessment materials,
Quality

f. sample of revised assessment tool,

g. copy of the adjusted assessment tool per assessment result.

Very Satisfactory Any four (4) of the acceptable MOVs

(4)

Satisfactory Any three (3) of the acceptable MOVs

(3)

Unsatis factory Any two (2) of the acceptable MOVs

(2)

Poor Any one (1) of the acceptable MOVs

(1)
1. Creation of Assessment Review Team with terms of reference
2. Evidence of Reviewed Assessment Tool/s on written work such as sample
Pupils'/Students' Portfolio with specific rubrics; sample Pupils' Students' Journals
with rubrics and other written work like Reaction of Reflection Paper, Students'
Researches, etc.
3. Evidence of Reviewed Assessment Tool/s on Performance Task such as
Culminating Activities, Simulation and Actual Performance of Task/s
Basic Education Services

4. Evidence of Reviewed Assessment Tool/s on Quarterly Examinations with TOS

and/or Summative Tests
Outstanding 5. Documentation of the Review of Assessment Tools (FGD, meeting) conducted
(5) by school community and stakeholders
6. Evidences of modification of assessment tools based on the suggestions
gathered from the FGD
7. Assessment results are conveyed to stakeholders through assemblies and other
appropriate online or offline strategies
Efficiency

8. Documents on the Learning Programs/Activities developed as a result of

assessment

Very Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 7

(4)

Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 4

(3)
Presence of items 1 to 2
Unsatis factory
(2)

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS
4. DEVELOPING 4.1. Implemented 1. L&D Needs Report of the school and community leaders (Barangay Captain,
SELF AND OTHERS professional development 4Ps leaders, NGO President, etc.)
initiatives to enhance 2. Capacity-building program plan based on the identified L&D needs
strengths and address 3. Implementation plan showing the budget source (GAA from the stakeholders)
performance gaps among 4. Training Plan ( inclusion of GAD, Child Protection, etc.) for community leaders
school personnel including funding source
Outstanding 5. Inclusion of training plans in the AIP/PPMP
(5) 6. Training Report
7. Monitoring and evaluation report on the conduct of the trainings/ TA
8. Documentation implementation of Community of Practice (COP) involving
school community leaders

Quality
Very Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 7
(4)
Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 5
(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of items 1 to 3
(2)
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Completion report/documentation of four (4) of the following professional
development initiatives:
1. School INSET,
2. TIP,
Outstanding
3. Coaching and Mentoring,
(5)
4. 10 LAC sessions,
5. Job Rotations,
Efficiency

6. Benchmarking

Very Satisfactory Completion report/documentation of three (3) of the following professional

(4) development initiatives
Satisfactory Completion report/documentation of two (2) of the following professional
(3) development initiatives
Unsatis factory Completion report/documentation of one (1) of the following professional
(2) development initiatives
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
4.2. Provided opportunities Outstanding Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities of 86-
to individuals and teams in (5) 100% of the school personnel
Basic Education Services

performing leadership roles

Very Satisfactory Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities of 71-
and responsibilities
(4) 85% of the school personnel
Quality

Satisfactory Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities of 56-

(3) 70% of the school personnel
Unsatis factory Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities of 41-
(2) 55% of the school personnel
Poor Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities of 40%
(1) of the school personnel and below
Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities in the
conduct of the enumerated activities:
1. SLAC
2. School INSET
Outstanding 3. Assignments to Task Forces/Committees/special projects
(5) 4. Job Rotations
5. Benchmarking
6. Coaching and Mentoring
Efficiency

Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities in the

Very Satisfactory
conduct of any five (5) of the enumerated activities
(4)

Satisfactory Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities in the

(3) conduct of any four (4) of the enumerated activities

Unsatis factory Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities in the

(2) conduct of any three (3) of the enumerated activities

Poor Documentation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities in the

(1) conduct of any one (1) or two (2) of the enumerated activities

4.3. Implemented a school Presence of all of the following:

rewards system to
recognize and motivate
learners, school personnel
and other stakeholders for
exemplary performance
and/or continued support
Quality
1. Minutes of Consultative Meetings on Rewards and Incentives System
Mechanism (School Memo, School Bulletin, Guidelines, Committees);
2. Documentations including the approved school R&R Programs (certificate of
accreditation)
3. List of Stakeholders as Members of School PRAISE
Outstanding 4. Documentation on objectively verifiable indicators (list of awardees/donors
(5) among others);
5. Resolutions on Incentives and Rewards System (LGU, NGO, BLGU);
6. List of awardees in different categories;

7. Documentation of activities conducted (sample program, pictures)

Very Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 4

(4)
Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 2
(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of item 1
(2)
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS
Conducted at least five (5) of the following activities:
1. Issuance of school policy/guidelines/memo aligned with Division Memorandum
No, 113, s. 2020
2. Creation of Rewards and Recognition Committee
Outstanding 3. Selection of applicants
(5) 4. Development of selection criteria per category
5. Sourcing of funds (for prizes
6. Awarding/Recognition Ceremony/ies

Efficiency
Very Satisfactory Conducted at least four (4) of the identified activities
(4)
Satisfactory Conducted at least three (3) of the identified activities
(3)
Unsatis factory Conducted at least two (2) of the identified activities
(2)
Poor Conducted at least one (1) of the identified activities
(1)
Basic Education Services

5. BUILDING 5.1. Built constructive Presented all of the following evidences with corresponding minutes and photo
CONNECTIONS relationships with documentation:
authorities, colleagues, 1.Terms of Reference (TOR) of Members /List of Roles and responsibilities/Job
parents and other Description
stakeholders to foster an 2. Written Designation of accountable persons based on applicable rules and
enabling and supportive regulations (as applicable) of SIP such as the school project team and School PMT
environment for learners 3. Constitution and By-laws (PTA, SGC and others)
4. Code of Conduct/Documentation of the School adoption and observance of the
Outstanding RA 6713
(5) 5. Ratified/Amended Constitution and By-laws (as applicable)
6. MOA/MOU/Board Resolution (as applicable)

Non-negotiable:
Addressed a grievance within the school level
Quality

Presence of items 1 to 4 and the non-negotiable:

Very Satisfactory Presence of a grievance which can be addressed in the school level but elevated to
(4) the schools district

Presence of items 1 to 2 and the non-negotiable:

Satisfactory Presence of a grievance which can be addressed in the school and district levels but
(3) elevated to the schools division

Presence of item 1 and the non-negotiable: Presence of a grievance which can be

Unsatis factory addressed in the school , district, and division levels but elevated to the regional
(2) office

Poor Presence of a grievance which can be addressed in the school, district, and division
(1) levels but elevated to the central office/national complaint desks
Have conducted at least 7 relevant activities in a year with documents such as:
1. Letters of Invitation
2. Memoranda
Outstanding 3. Attendance Sheets
(5) 4. Minutes of Meetings
5. Photo documentations
Efficiency

5.2. Communicated
effectively in speaking and
in writing to teachers,
learners, parents and other
stakeholders through
positive use of
communication platform to
facilitate information
sharing, collaboration and
support.
Quality
Very Satisfactory Have conducted at least 5-6 relevant activities in a year with all the identified
(4) documents
Satisfactory Have conducted at least 3-4 relevant activities in a year with all the identified
(3) documents
Unsatis factory Have conducted at least 1-2 relevant activities in a year with all the identified
(2) documents
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Have presented all of the following evidences such as:
1. Documentation of School Assemblies and Meetings
2. State of the School Address (SOSA)
3. Updated School Report Card (SRC) - Mid-Year and year-end
4. All SF 9 (Report Cards are signed by the parents)
5. Learners Profile with Anecdotal Records
Outstanding 6. Formulated School Policy Guidelines on learner development activities
(5) 7. Presented/Communicated SRCs to stakeholders
8. LGU/Community Resolutions/Municipal/Barangay Ordinance supporting the
activities for the total development of learners (such as Brigada Eskwela and Brigada
Basa/ Pagbasa etc.)
9. Manual/Handbook on learning and monitoring system is available

Have presented items 1 to 7

Very Satisfactory
(4)

Satisfactory Have presented items 1 to 4

(3)

Unsatis factory Have presented items 1 to 2

Basic Education Services

(2)
Poor
No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Basic Education Services PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS
Documentation showing communication of the non-negotiable documents (SRC,
SIP/AIP, BE-LCP, MDL) through the use of any five (5) communication platforms
such as :
1. text
2. letters/memo
Outstanding 3. tarpaulin
(5) 4. bandillo
5. FB page/FB account
6. radio broadcast
7. flyers
8. Others

Efficiency
Documentation showing communication the non-negotiable documents (SRC,
Very Satisfactory SIP/AIP, BE-LCP, MDL) through the use of any four (4) communication platforms
(4)

Documentation showing communication the non-negotiable documents (SRC,

Satisfactory SIP/AIP, BE-LCP, MDL) through the use of any three (3) communication platforms
(3)

Documentation showing communication the non-negotiable documents (SRC,

Unsatis factory SIP/AIP, BE-LCP, MDL) through the use of any one to two (1-2) communication
(2) platforms

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
5.3. Initiated partnerships Evidences of initiated partnership activities depending on the school size:
with the community such as • Mega School – at least 17
parents, alumni, authorities, Outstanding • Large School – at least 14
industries and other (5) • Medium School – at least 9
stakeholders, to strengthen • Small School – at least 5
support for learner
development, as well as Evidences of initiated partnership activities depending on the school size:
school and community • Mega School – 13-16
improvement. Very Satisfactory • Large School – 11-13
(4) • Medium School –7-8
• Small School – 4

Evidences of initiated partnership activities depending on the school size:

• Mega School – 9-12
Quality

Satisfactory • Large School – 8-10

(3) • Medium School – 5-6
• Small School – 3

Evidences of initiated partnership activities depending on the school size:

• Mega School – 5-8
Unsatis factory • Large School – 4-6
(2) • Medium School – 3-4
• Small School – 2

Evidences of initiated partnership activities depending on the school size:

• Mega School – 0-4
Poor • Large School – 0-3
(1) • Medium School – 0-2
Basic Education Services

• Small School – 0-1

Have presented all of the following evidences such as:

1. Directory of school and community leaders with their names and updated contact
information such as; email, cellphone number are available.

2. List of LGUs, NGAs, NGOs, Alumni and other partners for the last 5 years with
previous engagement.

3. Copy of Pledge of Commitment indicating school and community leaders’ support

in making decisions and/or solving school problems is available.
4. Availability of any of the ff: reports;
a. Incident Reports
b. Spot Reports
Outstanding c. Intake Sheets
(5) d. Referral Slips
5.Invitation letters, Attendance Sheets, Minutes of the Meeting with Photos/Videos or
other related documents of leaders’ discussing school problem/s and proposing
solutions are available.
Efficiency

6.Copy of Memorandum of Agreement/Understanding entered/forged between the

school and identified community leaders/members addressing a particular school
problem is available.
7. List of completed programs and projects implemented in collaboration with the
community stakeholders

Very Satisfactory Have presented items 1 to 5

(4)
Satisfactory Have presented items 1 to 3
(3)
Unsatis factory Have presented items 1 to 2
(2)
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS
6. Plus Factor Performed related tasks Performed any 5 of the following:
1. Facilitator/Resource speaker in trainings;
2. Acted as one of the writers of instructional materials/modules/manuals in the division and/or
higher level
3. Acted as consultant to any academic activities and/or any management jobs;
4. Acted as member of district and/or higher level committees;
5. Conducted at least one (1) relevant research in any area within the rating period;
6. Conducted innovation to address learning gaps;
7. Published educational article on any tabloid/spreadsheet/credible online-site of wide

Efficiency
circulation
Outstanding 8. Member of district and higher level QA team
(5) 9. Acted as instructional coach/ District LAC leader
Basic Education Services

10. Member of TWG in the district and/or higher level

11. District and/or higher level awardee
12. Finalist of any division-initiated competition/contest/search
13. Recipient of special citation/recognition in the district and higher level 14.
Host of any district or division activity

Very Satisfactory any 4 of the enumerated items

(4)
Satisfactory any 3 of the enumerated items
(3)
Unsatis factory any 2 of the enumerated items
(2)
Poor any 1 of the enumerated items or no acceptable evidence
(1)