Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/273519963

Surface decontamination of plant tissue explants with chlorine dioxide gas

Article  in  In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · December 2014


DOI: 10.1007/s11627-014-9659-4

CITATIONS READS

6 481

4 authors:

Bhawana .. Jeannie M Stubblefield


University of Delhi University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
4 PUBLICATIONS   23 CITATIONS    17 PUBLICATIONS   27 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Anthony L Newsome A. Bruce Cahoon


Middle Tennessee State University The University of Virginia's College at Wise, United States, Wise
32 PUBLICATIONS   750 CITATIONS    41 PUBLICATIONS   472 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Bhawana .. on 03 June 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.—Plant (2015) 51:214–219
DOI 10.1007/s11627-014-9659-4

PROTOCOLS/METHODS

Surface decontamination of plant tissue explants with chlorine


dioxide gas
Bhawana & Jeannie M. Stubblefield & Anthony L. Newsome &
A. Bruce Cahoon

Received: 4 April 2014 / Accepted: 25 November 2014 / Published online: 17 December 2014 / Editor: John Forster
# The Society for In Vitro Biology 2014

Abstract The surfaces of plant tissues readily harbor bacteria, Introduction


fungi, and spores making their preparation and growth by
aseptic micropropagation difficult. Recent innovations in One of the challenging aspects of plant micropropagation is
chlorine dioxide (ClO2) gas production now allow for the the eradication of viable microorganisms from the surfaces of
generation of small amounts of the gas to meet specific needs. explants intended for aseptic culture. Vegetative bacterial
This report demonstrates the efficacy of ClO2 gas in the cells, dormant spores, and fungal hyphae adhere to irregular
preparation of plant tissues for micropropagation. Cauliflower plant tissue surfaces. This microbiota is difficult to remove or
curd was surface decontaminated with 1500, 600, 300, and inactivate and can quickly cause significant losses to commer-
150 ppm of gas for 30, 60, 180, and 360 min, and the presence cial plant propagation operations or studies requiring plant
of tissue surfaces for microbiota were assayed. The use of tissue culture (Adams and Hartley 1989; Liao and Sapers
ClO2 gas in this system decontaminated cauliflower curd 2000). In addition, widely used disinfectants often do not kill
surfaces at rates equal to bleach treatment, but the ClO2- or remove all dormant spores which may germinate in days or
treated tissues grew more quickly and were healthier than months after a seemingly aseptic culture has been initiated.
the bleach-treated cauliflower curd samples. Chlorine dioxide Numerous compounds such as ethanol, mercuric chloride,
gas potentially represents an easy means to surface decontam- calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen perox-
inate plant tissues intended for micropropagation that, when ide, bromine water, silver nitrate, silver chloride,
properly used, does not pose a risk to human health. benzalkonium chloride, and antibiotics have been used to
remove or inactivate biological contaminants associated with
plant tissues (Yeoman and Macleod 1977; Beyl 2000;
Keywords Plant tissue culture . Chlorine dioxide gas . Sathyanarayana and Varghese 2007). All of these compounds
Cauliflower . Micropropagation are toxic to the plant tissues, and balancing the eradication of
viable contaminating microbiota while maintaining explant
viability can be difficult. In addition, some of these com-
pounds present safety risks and produce hazardous wastes that
require special handling procedures for use and disposal.
Sodium hypochlorite (household bleach) is the most common-
ly used reagent due to its relative effectiveness as well as low
Bhawana and Jeannie M. Stubblefield contributed equally to this
research.
cost, accessibility, and ease of use.
Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) gas and solutions have been used
Bhawana : J. M. Stubblefield : A. L. Newsome : A. B. Cahoon (*)
to meet a variety of disinfection needs for decades. Wide-
Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Box 60,
Murfreesboro, TN 37132, USA spread use of the gas has been limited because it is too
e-mail: abc6c@uvawise.edu unstable for shipment and must be prepared at the application
site. Historically, ClO2 gas generation has required the use of
Present Address:
dedicated equipment and trained personnel. More recent ad-
A. B. Cahoon
Department of Natural Sciences, The University of Virginia’s vances in ClO2 gas generation technology, however, have
College, Wise, 1 College Ave., Wise, VA 24293, USA made possible the cost-efficient generation for smaller
CHLORINE DIOXIDE GAS DECONTAMINATION 215

applications. Previous studies from this laboratory have dem- the following estimated peak concentrations: 1500 ppm
onstrated the antibacterial properties of ClO2 gas generated by (1.3 g of each powder), 600 ppm (0.52 g), 300 ppm
an easily used portable ClO2 gas generation system (ICA (0.26 g), or 150 ppm (0.13 g). Explants and powders
TriNova, Newnan, GA) consisting of two granular precursors were left in the closed containers for 30, 60, 180, or
(sodium chlorite plus an activator). When placed together, 360 min. There were likely to be small variations in the
ClO2 gas can be generated to meet a specific application need concentration of gas during the treatment time due to
(Salehzadeh 2008; Newsome et al. 2009; Newsome and yield escalation during the initial minutes of treatment
Stubblefield 2011). followed by consumption due to oxidant demand from
The purpose of this investigation was to document the cauliflower explants. The amount of ClO2 gas in the
efficacy of an inexpensive and easily applied ClO2 gas system treatment containers was estimated based on previously
to inactivate surface bacteria and fungi associated with plant established yield curves that were generated during
surfaces for subsequent introduction into aseptic culture. For treatment of organic materials such as fruits and plant
this, cauliflower (Brassica oleracea) curd explants were treat- cuttings which have a similar oxidant demand (personal
ed with ClO2 gas and compared to the more traditional bleach communication, Joel Tenney, ICA TriNova). After incu-
treatment. Results suggested that ClO2 gas could inactivate bation, the containers were opened in a laminar flow
plant surface microorganisms at a rate comparable to bleach hood and explants were placed into culture medium.
treatments but with greater tissue viability. This system offers
an effective alternative gas-based procedure to support plant Culture media and conditions. Plant surface decontamination
micropropagation that does not produce hazardous solid was assessed by incubating treated explants in trypticase soy
waste, nor does it pose a significant risk to human health. broth (TSB) for 14 d at 25°C in darkness (Becton, Dickinson
Our results also imply that ClO2 gas treatments may be more and Company, Sparks MD). The TSB is a general purpose
widely applied in promoting the propagation of plants from medium that supports the multiplication of a wide variety of
cuttings in many different plant tissue culture settings. bacteria. Explant viability was tested by placing treated tissues
on shoot induction medium (MS-S) containing 1X Murashige
and Skoog salts and vitamins (MS; Murashige and Skoog
Materials and Methods 1962), 3% (w/v) sucrose, 200 mg/L myoinositol, 2.2 μM
BAP, 5.3 μM NAA, 5.7 μM IAA, 4.5 μM 2,4-D, and 0.8%
Plant tissue. Cauliflower curd was chosen to test the efficacy (w/v) plant tissue culture agar, pH 5.7, 21 d, 25°C, 1.5
of the antimicrobial ClO2 gas generation system. The large umol/m2/s light intensity.
surface area of the densely branched termini that make up
cauliflower tissue and its relatively quick response time in Experimental design. A TSB-based assay was used to de-
shoot culture make it an appropriate candidate for these gas termine the presence of bacteria remaining on the surface
surface-sterilization studies. Cauliflower heads were pur- of treated and untreated cauliflower explants. This assay
chased from a commercial market, and the curd cut into small was replicated twice with two different cauliflower heads
explants (10–15 mm2) using a sterile blade. purchased at different times. For each replicate, ten curd
explants were exposed to each treatment: 150, 300, 600,
Inactivation of plant surface associated microbiota. For and 1500 ppm ClO2 at 30, 60, 180, and 360 min. Equal
bleach treatment, tissues were washed for 20 min in numbers of explants were also bleach treated, autoclaved
1% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite with 0.1% (v/v) Tween (negative control), or left untreated (positive control).
20. Explants were washed three times with sterile water Treated tissues and controls were submerged in TSB me-
before introducing them to culture media. Explants were dium and incubated at 25°C in darkness for 14 d to
treated with ClO2 gas generated by the dry powder encourage growth of microorganisms. Cultures were
system produced by ICA TriNova (Newnan, Ga., USA, scored as positive for bacteria if the culture became turbid
catalog #SF-GKF-002 T). With this system, ClO2 gas is during the 14-d incubation period.
generated when equal portions of proprietary powder Tissue viability and culture efficacy were assayed by placing
‘A’ (sodium chlorite) was mixed with activator powder ten curd explants treated with 600 or 300 ppm ClO2 for
‘B’. Explants were placed in a 1-L glass dish with a 360 min, 1500 or 600 ppm ClO2 for 180 min, 1500 ppm
plastic lid purchased at a kitchen supply store. Equal ClO2 for 60 min, onto MS-S medium (described above).
portions (w/w) of each of the dry ClO2 generation Bleach-treated and untreated samples were also cultured as
system components were mixed and placed in the glass controls. This assay was performed with two replicates with
dish taking care to prevent the powders from touching two cauliflower curds purchased at different times. Data col-
any of the tissue. Chlorine dioxide gas was generated lected from replicates were averaged, the standard error cal-
according to the manufacturer’s instructions to produce culated, and graphed for each experiment.
216 BHAWANA ET AL.

100% * * * * *

Absence of Microbial Growth


80%

60%

40%

20%

0%
au un bl
150

300

600

1500

150

300
600

1500

150

300
600

1500

150

300
600

1500
30 min 60 min 180 min 360 min

Figure 1 Results of TSB assay showing inactivation of cauliflower curd represents the average number ± standard error of TSB cultures that
surface microbiota using ClO2 gas generated with fast release powder. remained clear suggesting no bacterial growth. Tissues treated under
Columns au, autoclaved tissues; un, untreated; bl, surface conditions within the dashed line box were viable and produced shoots
decontaminated using bleach; 150, 300, 600, or 1500, estimated peak on MS-S medium. Asterisks denote the most promising conditions chosen
ppm ClO2; 30, 60, 180, or 360 min, time of treatment. The y-axis for further testing.

Results

Cauliflower curd explants were treated with a range of ClO2 (A)


Viable Cauliflower Explant

100%
concentrations (150, 330, 600, and 1500 ppm) for four differ-
ent time lengths (30, 60, 180, and 360 min) to determine its 80%
ability to inactivate plant surface microbiota without
compromising explant viability for tissue culture. Microbiota 60%

viability was determined by submerging treated portions of 40%


curd into TSB medium to encourage growth of viable micro-
organisms. Turbidity of the TSB medium was scored as 20%
recovery of viable microbiota. Absence of turbidity was
0%
scored as a lack of microbial viability and growth. For com- (B)
Absence of Microbial Growth

parative purposes, duplicate explant tissues were treated with 100%


bleach, autoclaved (positive control), or left untreated (nega-
80%
tive control). A separate set of duplicate tissues was incubated
on MS-S medium to determine explant viability. This was 60%
measured as the ability of the white curd to become green and
produce shoots. Tissues treated with 1500 ppm ClO2 for 60 or 40%

180 min, 600 ppm for 180 or 360 min, and 300 ppm for
20%
360 min were rendered free of recoverable surface microbiota
at a rate comparable to or greater than bleach treatments 0%
1500

600

1500

300

600

(Fig. 1). Most of the ClO2 treatments gave rise to viable un bl


explant tissue as measured in small scale (n=6, one replicate)
60 min 180 min 360 min
MS-S assays (Fig. 1). Tissues treated with 1500 ppm for
Figure 2 Impact of the most promising ClO2 gas treatments on
360 min had no detectable growth of microbiota but also elimination of viable microbiota and subsequent cauliflower curd
failed to show any growth response in MS-S medium sug- explant viability. Un, untreated; bl, surface decontaminated using
gesting the upper limit of tissue viability to ClO2 gas had been bleach; 150, 300, 600, or 1500, estimated peak ppm ClO2; 30, 60, 180,
exceeded. The ClO2 treatments that produced the most prom- or 360 min, time of treatment. A The average number ± standard error of
viable cauliflower explants from two replicates is shown. All non-
ising results were identified and subsequent replicates per- contaminated cultures were productive and were counted as viable. B
formed. Further replicates yielded results analogous to the The average number ± standard error of non-turbid cultures from four
initial TSB and MS-S assays (Fig. 2). replicates with standard error bars is shown.
CHLORINE DIOXIDE GAS DECONTAMINATION 217

ClO2-treated tissues had a brown oxidized appearance (A)


(Fig. 3A). A qualitative assessment of tissue viability suggested
that the browning might have only affected the outermost
layers of cells since the explants were still able to initiate shoot
production (Fig. 3C–G). Visual inspection of tissues treated
with ClO2 gas also suggested this strategy had less detrimental (B)
effects on the tissue than the more conventionally used bleach
treatment to eliminate plant surface microbiota (Fig. 4).

Discussion
(C)

Chlorine dioxide is a strong oxidizing agent that has approx-


imately 2.5 times the oxidation ability of chlorine (Benarde

(D)
(A)

(E)

(F)
(B) (C)

Figure 4 Shoot culture viability of cauliflower curd treated with ClO2


gas. A Ten portions of cauliflower curd cleaned with 1% sodium
hypochlorite for 20 min (bleach control). B Treatment for 60 min in
(D) (E) 1500 estimated peak ppm ClO2 gas; C 180 min in 600 ppm; D 180 min
in 1500 ppm; E 360 min in 300 ppm; or F 360 min in 600 ppm. Treated
tissues were placed on MS-S medium and incubated for 21 d at 25°C.
Shoot tissues produced in this culture system often grow in a negatively
geotropic manner regardless of the surface decontamination method.

et al. 1965). It is also reported to be effective in disruption of


biofilms and bacteria (Simpson et al. 1993; Gagnon et al.
2005). Because of its broad biocidal properties, in 1967,
(F) (G) ClO2 (in solution) was registered as a disinfectant and
sanitizer by the United States Environmental Protection Agen-
cy (EPA 2012). Chlorine dioxide has been widely used for
potable water preparation, wastewater treatment, and food
sanitation (Aieta and Berg 1986; Simpson et al. 1993;
Gómez-López et al. 2009). The use of ClO2 gas and solutions
for use in intimate human activities or products that may be
Figure 3 Tissue discoloration and viability after chlorine dioxide consumed by humans is additionally supported by the report-
treatments. A An untreated explant (left) and chlorine dioxide treated ed absence of cumulative adverse health effects when properly
(right) immediately after ClO2 gas exposure. B Explants cultured in
used (US DHHS 2004). Chlorine dioxide is also not consid-
MS-S medium 2 wks after treatment with bleach. C 300 estimated peak
ppm ClO2 for 360 min; D 600 ppm 180 min; E 600 ppm 360 min; F ered carcinogenic or to be a reproductive hazard. More recent
1500 ppm 60 min; and G 1500 ppm 180 min. studies have suggested that ClO2 gas can be more effective
218 BHAWANA ET AL.

than ClO2 disinfecting solutions in eliminating bacteria on inception of micropropagation, the reduction or elimination
irregular surfaces such as animal skin and it was proposed of the plant microbial pathogens has been an enduring prob-
that the gas was more effective in penetrating the irregular skin lem, which still frequently causes significant plant loss. Un-
surface that could harbor bacteria (Newsome and Stubblefield fortunately, there have not been recent developments for im-
2011). proving the sanitation of plant explants for micropropagation.
The excellent biocidal properties of ClO2 gas along with its Sodium hypochlorite has been widely used and served as a
favorable toxicity properties have suggested its use against mainstay in the disinfection of plant explants for subsequent
human pathogens that could reside on plant produce. Here, its propagation. It is readily available and inexpensive. However,
use has been viewed and used in terms of promotion of human bleach can be highly damaging to plant tissue thus
health by inactivating pathogens that may be associated with diminishing explant viability. In addition, its ability to elimi-
plants consumed by humans. This activity is supported also by nate plant-associated microbiota is often not ideal. When
demonstrating ClO2 gas treatment of plant produce results in compared to bleach, certain concentrations of ClO2 gas were
minimal to no detectable chemical residues and poses an more effective in eliminating damaging microbiota and in
insignificant risk for subsequent human consumption (Trinetta promoting the outgrowth of healthy plant explants.
et al. 2011). A major concern in human consumption of plants The development of inexpensive, highly portable, and
or plant products is Escherichia coli O157:H7. On apple easily used ClO2 gas generating technologies have made this
surfaces, ClO2 gas was effective in the elimination of this gas available for more widespread use and novel applications
pathogen (Du et al. 2003). Comparative studies have sug- as outlined in this study. This technology has the potential to
gested that gaseous ClO2 treatments are more effective in the serve individuals with a personal interest (hobbyists) in the
elimination of surface bacteria on plant tissue than washing or outgrowth of plant explants as well as those engaged in a
use of disinfection solutions (Singh et al. 2002). The bacterial larger setting with commercial interests in plant regeneration
burden of E. coli O157:H7 on basil and lettuce leaves was via tissue culture.
significantly reduced with ClO2 gas (Ortega et al. 2008). The
gas also demonstrated good efficacy on plant produce against
other human pathogens such as Salmonella and Listeria spp.
Conclusions
Here, it was demonstrated that these gas treatments were also
effective against yeasts and molds associated with plant pro-
Results of the current study suggest a novel application for the
duce (Sy et al. 2005a, b; Wu and Kim 2007).
use of ClO2 gas that has potential benefit to individuals and
A logical extension of these studies is a determination of
industrial groups engaged in micropropagation of plant
the suitability of ClO2 gas treatments to reduce or eradicate
explants.
microbes that can diminish outgrowth in aseptic culture of
plant explants. Here, the desired outcome is not the reduction
or elimination of specific human microbial pathogens, but Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank MTSU’s Department of
Biology and the Molecular Biosciences Program for supporting this
rather the elimination of bacteria, yeast, and molds that can
work. The chlorine dioxide dry powder generation system was provided
cause loss in subsequent plant propagation from the explants. by ICA TriNova, Newnan, GA.
For this determination, ClO2 gas treatments were compared to
the often used sodium hypochlorite (bleach) treatment. Using
a cauliflower curd model system, ClO2 gas could be used to
eliminate viable microbiota at a level equivalent to sodium References
hypochlorite. The elimination of microbiota by ClO2 gas was
achieved without severely compromising viability for Adams MR, Hartley AD (1989) Factors affecting the efficacy of washing
micropropagation. The favorable results observed in the cur- procedures used in the production of prepared salads. Food
Microbiol 6:69–77
rent study are likely at least in part a reflection of two ClO2 gas Aieta EM, Berg JD (1986) A review of chlorine dioxide in drinking water
properties. First, results could be attributed to its strong oxi- treatment. J Am Water Works Assoc 78:62–70
dizing properties. Secondly, it is likely that the gas phase of Benarde MA, Israel MM, Oliveri VP, Granstrom ML (1965) Efficacy of
ClO2 is more proficient than liquid disinfectants in penetrating chlorine dioxide as a bactericide. Appl Environ Microbiol 13:776–780
Beyl CA (2000) Getting started with tissue culture—media, preparation,
porous niches on plant tissues that can harbor microbiota that sterile technique, and laboratory equipment. In: Trigiano RN, Gray
are detrimental to the outgrowth of plant explants. DJ (eds) Plant tissue culture concepts and laboratory exercises, 2nd
Micropropagation of plants has been in place since the late edn. CRC Press, New York
1950s. It allows for the creation of large numbers of plants Du J, Han Y, Linton RH (2003) Efficacy of chlorine dioxide gas in
reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7 on apple surfaces. Food
from small fragments (explants) of a stock plant. Clean stock Microbiol 20:583–591
material and explants free of plant microbial pathogens are EPA (2012) Anthrax spore decontamination using chlorine dioxide.
key factors in the creation of healthy plants. Since the United States Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.
CHLORINE DIOXIDE GAS DECONTAMINATION 219

gov/pesticides/factsheets/chemicals/chlorinedioxidefactsheet.htm. Simpson GD, Miller RF, Laxton GD, Clements WR (1993) A focus on
Cited 2013 June 8 chlorine dioxide: the ideal biocide. Paper No 472, Corrosion 93,
Gagnon GA, Rand JL, O’Leary KC, Rygel AC (2005) Disinfectant New Orleans, La (March 8–12) paper no. 472
efficacy of chlorite and chlorine dioxide in drinking water biofilms. Singh N, Singh RK, Bhunia AK, Stroshine RL (2002) Efficacy of
Water Res 39:1809–1817 chlorine dioxide, ozone, and thyme essential oil or a sequential
Gómez-López VM, Rajkovic A, Ragaert P, Smigic N, Devlieghere F washing in killing Escherichia coli 0157:H7 on lettuce and baby
(2009) Chlorine dioxide for minimally processes produce preserva- carrots. LWT-Food Sci Technol 35:720–729
tion: a review. Trends Food Sci Tech 20:17–26 Sathyanarayana BN, Varghese DB (2007) Plant tissue culture: practices
Liao CH, Sapers GM (2000) Attachment and growth of Salmonella and new experimental protocols. I K International Publishing
Chester on apple fruits and in vivo response of attached bacteria to House, New Delhi
sanitizer treatments. J Food Protect 63:876–883 Sy KV, McWatters KH, Beuchat LR (2005a) Efficacy of gaseous chlorine
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and dioxide as a sanitizer for killing Salmonella, yeasts, and molds on
bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497 blueberries, strawberries, and raspberries. J Food Protect 68:1165–1175
Newsome AL, DuBois JD, Tenney JD (2009) Disinfection of football Sy KV, Murray MB, Harrison MD, Beuchat LR (2005b) Evaluation of
protective equipment using chlorine dioxide produced by the ICA gaseous chlorine dioxide as a sanitizer for killing Salmonella,
TriNova system. BMC Public Health 9:326–334 Escherichia coli 0157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and yeasts and
Newsome AL, Stubblefield JM (2011) Novel disinfection applica- molds on fresh and fresh produce. J Food Protect 68:1176–1187
tions using a portable chlorine dioxide gas generation system. Trinetta V, Vaidya N, Linton R, Morgan M (2011) Evaluation of chlorine
Report on the 2011 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dioxide gas residues on selected food produce. J Food Sci 76:T11–T15
( E PA ) D e c o n t a m i n a t i o n R e s e a r c h a n d D e v e l o p m e n t US DHHS (2004) Toxicological profile for chlorine dioxide and chlorite.
Conference, pp 61–62 United States Department of Health and Human Services http://
Ortega YR, Mann A, Torres MP, Cama V (2008) Efficacy of gaseous www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp160.pdf. cited 2013 June 15
chlorine dioxide as a sanitizer against Cryptosporidium parvum, Wu V, Kim B (2007) Effect of a simple chlorine dioxide method for
Cyclospora cayetanensis, and Encephapitozoon intestinalis on pro- controlling five foodborne pathogens, yeasts and molds on blue-
duce. J Food Protect 71:2410–2414 berries. Food Microbiol 24:794–800
Salehzadeh I (2008) Decontamination assessment of Bacillus atrophaeus Yeoman MM, Macleod AJ (1977) Tissue (callus) cultures—techniques.
spores on common surfaces using chlorine dioxide gas and a novel In: Street HE (ed) Plant Tissue and Cell Culture. 2nd ed, University
device. MS thesis, Middle Tennessee State University, USA of California Press, pp 31–60

View publication stats

You might also like