Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development of Low-Noise Cooling Fan-Lee2008
Development of Low-Noise Cooling Fan-Lee2008
Development of Low-Noise Cooling Fan-Lee2008
SAE TECHNICAL
PAPER SERIES 2008-01-0569
400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001 U.S.A. Tel: (724) 776-4841 Fax: (724) 776-0790 Web: www.sae.org
Downloaded from SAE International by Univ of California Berkeley, Friday, July 27, 2018
By mandate of the Engineering Meetings Board, this paper has been approved for SAE publication upon
completion of a peer review process by a minimum of three (3) industry experts under the supervision of
the session organizer.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of SAE.
SAE Permissions
400 Commonwealth Drive
Warrendale, PA 15096-0001-USA
Email: permissions@sae.org
Tel: 724-772-4028
Fax: 724-776-3036
ISSN 0148-7191
Copyright © 2008 SAE International
Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of SAE.
The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper. A process is available by which discussions
will be printed with the paper if it is published in SAE Transactions.
Persons wishing to submit papers to be considered for presentation or publication by SAE should send the
manuscript or a 300 word abstract of a proposed manuscript to: Secretary, Engineering Meetings Board, SAE.
Printed in USA
Downloaded from SAE International by Univ of California Berkeley, Friday, July 27, 2018
2008-01-0569
structure and the fan. The shorter the distance, more Different BPF patterns result for the shrouds. For the
aerodynamic disturbance is to be experienced by the fan, centered fan, the 2nd BPF is dominant, while for the off-
creating more noise. The test setup and the noise centered fan, the 1st BPF is the largest. The inflow
spectra by varying the distance between the fan and the velocity difference between left and right of the fan in the
vertical beam is shown in Fig. 2. All measurements are eccentric case result in the excitation of the first mode.
taken 1m directly in front of the fan along the axis of In case of the centered fan, the inflow velocity changes
rotation. For a rectangular sectioned beam, and along the two diagonals of the shroud, thus resulting in
increase of 30mm in the space between the fan and the the 2nd mode excitation.
beam reduced the tonal noise by 4dBA.
FAN-ENGINE GAP
dB (A)
X mm X+30mm
Small
Hz Hz Large gap
ٻ gap
Fig 2. Effect of vertical beam’s distance from the fan on fan noise (each
grid 10dBA in y-axis)
dB (A)
SHROUD SHAPE
Fan shroud is, with the exception of the fan blade shape,
the most important contributor to fan noise. Fan noise Hz Hz
can be greatly reduced by modifying shroud shape. Here,
Fig. 4 Fan noise for different fan-engine gap (each grid 10dBA in y-
the fan’s location in a rectangular shroud is considered.
axis)
Fig. 3 compares the noise spectrum of a same fan,
mounted on different shrouds. In one of the shrouds, the
fan in mounted exactly in the center of the rectangle,
while the same fan is position to a side in another. .
As seen above, fan noise, especially the BPF tone,
tends to be aggravated due to various conditions in an
actual vehicle. This is more so in recent years when
parts tend to be packed tightly together. These
structural restraints are difficult to change for they are
related to other aspects of a vehicle such as styling and
crash-safety. To overcome these restraints, uneven
bladed fans are developed, and the benefits of the new
fans will be reviewed with consideration of the factors
reviewed in this section.
dB (A)
DEVELOPMENT OF UNEVEN BLADED FAN
A
measured dB
Hz
5.5dB reduction predicted
dB (A)
predicted
B
dB
Hz
G
Hz 4.5dB reduction predicted
G
Fig. 5 Measured noise vs. predicted noise for a given fan (each grid
10dBA in y-axis)UNEVEN FAN DESIGN
Fig. 6 Seven-bladed fan designs
6.3dB reduction in the maximum peak level from the seen to overlap very well with the sector lines. As
even bladed fan. The largest peak occurs at the 24th discussed in the beginning of this investigation,
shaft order (SO, i.e., harmonic of the rotational rectangular shrouds give rise to the inflow disturbance
frequency), and a similar peak is seen at the 12th SO. along its diagonals. The exact correspondence of the
diagonals with the sector lines additionally contributes to
SPECTRUM(dBA)
the 14th SO seen in Fig. 7. A similar explanation can be
70
applied for the 24th SO.
14th SO
24th SO
60
6.3dB
50
dB (A)
40
EVEN
30
7-A UNEVEN
20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 ٻ
Hz
ٻ
Fig. 7 Measured noise spectra for Model A and even bladed fan
(module state, each grid 10dBA in y-axis) Fig. 9 Fan shroud and the 14 sectors
One of the ways to gauge whether a harmonic would Model B, with its 14th and 24th SO’s predicted to be kept
have a large value is illustrated in Fig. 8. The 360 at a relatively low level, is tested. The largest peak
degrees is divided by the number of harmonic in leveled at 9.8dB lower compared to the even bladed fan.
question (here, 14). The lines dividing a unit circle into It is seen that for the given shroud geometry, Model B,
14 sectors are overlapped onto the fan’s projection. The although predicted to be the fan with less noise
more the lines coincide with the blades in their angular reduction, performs better than Model A.
positions, the larger the peak. For the 14th harmonic
discussed here, three blades coincide with sector lines 70
SPECTRUM(dBA)
50
dB (A)
40
EVEN
30
7-B UNEVEN
20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 G
G Hz
th
Fig. 8 Assessment of the blades contributing to 14 harmonic Fig. 10 Measured noise spectra for Model B and even bladed fan
(module state, each grid 10dBA in y-axis)
CONTACT
Contact : trojans91@hotmail.com