Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation Criteria - Paulo Cesar Diniz Bicudo
Evaluation Criteria - Paulo Cesar Diniz Bicudo
Evaluation Criteria - Paulo Cesar Diniz Bicudo
Department of Mechatronics
H-4028 Debrecen, Ótemető street 2-4.
Phone: +36 52/512-752/77742, email: tothnora@eng.unideb.hu
Reviewer’s
Evaluation criteria Range
score
1. Editing and style 0 – 20 points 19
2.Quality and utilization of applied literature 0 – 20 points 18
3. Quality of relevant technology applied 0 – 20 points 19
4. Assessment of usage results of technology applied 0 – 20 points 19
5. Novelty of the chosen technology described in thesis in
0 – 20 points 19
engineering environment
Total points: 94 points, -5*-
If the total score is fewer than 50 the qualification of the thesis will be exclusively failed (mark 1). The
suggested mark depends on the reviewer’s textual evaluation: between 50 and 62 is passed(2); between 63
and 75 is satisfactory(3); between 76 and 88 is good(4); and between 89 and 100 is excellent(5).
weakness:
1. The main objectives of the work not fully fulfilled (Build GUI to monitoring the robot path)
2. why you chose star algorithm rather than DFS and BFS.
Debrecen 15/12/2021
Alaa Saadah
Engineer and PhD student
University of Debrecen
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Mechatronics