Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Meaning of Development
Meaning of Development
I. Traditional definition:
a) In the past, development was about the capacity of a national economy to generate and sustain on annual
increase in its gross national product (GNP) or gross domestic product (GDP) or GDP per capita or GNP per
capita.
b) Although many economists will expand the above definitio.ns to real GNP per capita, and real GNP per capita at
PPP(Purchasing power parity) in USO for international comparison.
2. The above are basically definitions of economic growth. We probably want a more holistic definition of
development.
a) Dudley Seers ( 1969) suggested that development is when a country experiences a reduction or elimination of
poverty, inequality and unemployment.
b) Edgar Owens (1987) suggested that development is when there is development of people (human development)
and not development of things.
"Gandhi used the term 'development' in a very broad sense to mean the total development of society" that
include mental, spiritual, and material needs.
c) According to the World Development Report (WDR 1991 ): "The challenge of development ... is to improve
the quality of life ... better education, higher standards of health and nutrition, less poverty, a cleaner
environment, more equality of opportunity, greater individual freedom, and a richer cultural life."
1
c/iJ)
Mean ing of Deve lopme nt
Development is not purely an econo mic phenomenon but
rather a multi-dimensional process involving reorganizatio
and reorientation of entire econo mic and social system n
.
Todaro's three objectives of development
Development is process of improving the quality of all
human lives with three equally import t
1. Raising peoples ' living levels , i.e. incomes and consu an aspects. These are:
mption levels of food medical services d • h
relevant growth processes , , , e ucat1on t roug h
2
o'EJ}
Meaning of Development
;... Different concepts of development
f
}
The tenn sustainable development became fashionable in the 1980s in both the world conservation strategy
and the book entitled "Our Common Future", known as the Brundtland Report, 1987. Sustainable development
has been defined in many ways, but the most frequently quoted definition is from the Brundtland Report:
"Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generations to meet their own needs."
One can spot two clear issues. Firstly, the 'needs' are not defined. There is a major difference between the
needs of a person living in a Third-World country, as opposed to the needs of a person living in Western Europe.
Secondly, the definition does not offer any type of time frame, as 'generations' can only be vaguely interpreted.
The concept of sustainable development (SD) can be defined as maintenance and sustainable utilisation of the
functions (goods and services) provided by natural ecosystems and biospheric processes. Conversely, in a situation of
unsustainability, where the limits of the biosphere's carrying capacity (CC) are exceeded, not all of the environmental
functions can be fully fulfilled anymore. Let us recall some of the concepts and definitions of SD which integrate
ecological and economic regimentations.
The overall goal of sustainable development (SD) is the long-tenn stability of the economy and environment;
this is only achievable through the integration and acceptance of economic, environmental, and social concerns
throughout the decision making process.
In the application of this definition of sustainable development, one issue concerns the substitutability of
capital. There are several types of capital: social, natural, and man-made. The definition of weak sustainable
development explains that only the aggregate level of capital matters: man-made, or manufactured, capital is an
adequate alternative to natural capital. Strong sustainability, on the other hand, recognizes the unique features of
natural resources that cannot be replaced by manufactured capital. Most ecologists and environmentalists are
proponents of the strong sustainability definition (Stoddart, 2011 ).
The key principle of sustainable development underlying all others is the integration of environmental, social,
and economic concerns into all aspects of decision making. All other principles in the SD framework have integrated
decision making at their core (Dernbach J.C., 2003; Stoddart, 2011). It is this deeply fixed concept of integration that
distinguishes sustainability from other forms of policy.
3
<fiJ}
Meaning of Development
,..-" /
~~
... >"~,.----; -- •--..____,....,.. . . ._
Environ rrnrntal
-~ ····,...
l
,"
L-------
b. iodiversi~. pollution prevention
· (air, water, land)
..
, .~ ' r --...,~ . /
.--------
·--,.
, -...._,
··-..... '··, __
~
_,,/'
Sustainable\
' Econom ic
'
\
/ / Social
l
,,
value forms
E I
value value forms
\
· quality and diversity. 1 Profit, return on
I well~being , community f
\
investments, financial
resilience , long-term
- development, secure
\~
livelil1ood. labor ~ viability. business
standards , health and ··--.,_ stability
°"'c:-.afety _ ~·,,,_,.,.,
",---...._- . _____,,.- ~~
--~ ·,-..._
---- -- -,,,-r
social,
Therefore, sustainable development requires the elimination of fragmentation; that is, environmental,
towards
and economic concerns must be integrated throughout decision making processes in order to move
development that is truly sustainable.
► Participatory development
Participatory development (PD) seeks to engage local populations in development projects.
In this process
general public who
stakeholders can share and influence control over development initiatives. These stakeholders are
and International
are directly or indirectly affected by the project, Government, civil society organisations, donors
s designed for their
financial institutions. Public participation in development seeks "to give the poor a part in initiative
ent work. It is
benefit". This gives spaces for more people into planning, implementation, and evaluation of developm
engaged in the
expected that development projects will be more sustainable and successful if local populations are
development process.
seeks to give
One of the most commonly accepted definitions of PD is as follows : "Participatory development
these projects will
the poor a part in initiatives and projects that are designed by outside organizations in the hopes that
an
be more sustainable and successful by involving local stakeholders in the projects goals." It has become
ions. It is often
increasingly accepted method of development practice and is employed by a variety of organizat
the proper
presented as an alternative to mainstream "top-down" development. There are some questions about
PD are the "Social
definition of PD as it varies depending on the perspective applied. Two perspectives that can define
Movement Perspective" and the "Institutional Perspective".
contributions and
The Institutional Perspective: Development organizations and institutions that want to include the
tory development.
views of communities and stakeholders in a project might use an institutionalized form of participa
project goal that was
The institutional perspective seeks the inputs of communities only to help achieve a pre-de tined
itsel f.
decided by someone (usually an expert from the development world) external from the community
ve,
The institutional perspective of participatory development, also known as the project-based perspecti
industry wherein
foJlows from the he hierarchical system of social organization inherent to the global development
4
cfiJ)
l .
I,
••
Meaning of Devel opme nt
development goals are determined by external actors and in wh ·
. . . . . h th
1c e success of the project is the main, focal point.
Community part1c1pat1on 1s welcomed and actively sought only but
only within th
of the project itself. e someti•mes narrow Jy defined range
5
. cfiJ)
Meaning of Development
2. A focus on sectors and areas of exclusion-for example, promoting urbanization hubs in peri-urban [denoting or
located in an area immediately adjacent to a city or urban area] areas that generate jobs or investment in employment
opportunities in rural areas, supported by rural infrastructure.
3. Equal opportunities for participation.
4. Building on local and indigenous while ensuring that modern knowledge can disperse easily through education
processes.
5. Redistributing social benefits including roads, electricity, health care and education.
6. Inspiring the self-help options of the poorest.
We would argue that we should consider four things in assessment and evaluation: (i) economic growth; (ii)
measures of income distribution, including income poverty; (iii) measures of average performance along dimensions
1. other than income, in particular education and health; and (iv) measures of distribution along non-income dimensions
rl
t! of well-being, including distribution not only across individuals but across salient groups such as gender or ethnicity.
:j In many ways, the Millennium Development Goals approach does this.
i
I
► Human Development
Human development is defined as the process of enlarging people's freedoms and opportunities and improving their
well-being; Human development is about the real freedom ordinary people have to decide about their identity and
;i future. The term refers to an expansion of human capabilities, a widening of choices, an enhancement of freedom, and
,,
:l a fulfilment of human rights. The human development approach, developed by the economist Mah bub UI Haq, is
anchored in Amartya Sen's work on human capabilities, often framed in terms of whether people are able to "be" and
"do" desirable things in life.
How do these ideas come together in the human development approach?
• People: the human development approach focuses on improving the lives people lead rather than assuming that
.! economic growth will lead, automatically, to greater opportunities for all. Income growth is an important means to
! development, rather than an end in itself.
• Opportunities: human development is about giving people more freedom and opportunities to live lives they value.
In effect this means developing people's abilities and giving them a chance to use them. The diagram below looks
at aspects of human development that are foundational (that is they are a fundamental part of human development);
and aspects that are more contextual (that is they help to create the conditions that allow people to flourish). Three
foundations for human development are to live a healthy and creative life, to be knowledgeable, and to have access
to resources needed for a decent standard of living. Many other aspects are important too, especially in helping to
create the right conditions for human development, such as environmental sustainability or gender equality.
• Choices: human development is, fundamentally, about more choice. It is about providing people with opportunities,
not insisting that they make use of them. No one can guarantee human happiness, and the choices people make are
their own concern. The process of development should at least create an environment for people, individually and
collectively, to develop to their full potential and to have a reasonable chance of leading productive and creative
lives that they value.
6
c/EJ)
ancfcommunity
i Participation-irf'political life ·
, Environmental sustainability
11rn1.1wmirt1 ,(,·'-d>il~Humansectirity and rights ,i •:· ·• :,·
7
o'lJ)