Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VTE - Treating With The Right Anticoagulant and Duration (May 2018)
VTE - Treating With The Right Anticoagulant and Duration (May 2018)
VTE - Treating With The Right Anticoagulant and Duration (May 2018)
Venous
thromboembolism
Treating with the
right anticoagulant
and duration
Key messages
Assess patient factors Select an appropriate anticoagulant Determine the duration of anticoagulation
*E xcluded in pivotal clinical trials investigating the effects of NOACs for treating VTE
Table 1. Characteristics of anticoagulants (adapted from local product information leaflets)
*Based on treatment costs to patients at public healthcare institutions. At the time of publication, rivaroxaban is the only NOAC listed on the Medication Assistance Fund (MAF).
MAF assistance does not apply when rivaroxaban is used for isolated distal DVT.
†
Includes INR monitoring and initial 5 days of LMWH
Extending duration of anticoagulation
To prevent clot and recurrent VTE, anticoagulation The risk of VTE recurrence depends on the presence
should be given for at least three months. A and nature of provoking factors (see Figure 2). 12,13
shorter duration of four to six weeks has been Unprovoked VTE has a higher risk of recurrence
shown to double the risk of recurrent VTE and compared with provoked VTE and may require
may be insufficient for active treatment. 11 extended treatment if bleeding risks are low or
moderate. 2 Extended treatment usually implies that
Extending treatment beyond three months anticoagulation will continue indefinitely.
involves balancing the risk of VTE recurrence
with the risk of bleeding.
Cancer-associated VTE
• W
ithout appropriate anticoagulation, about 1 in 5 patients with active cancer will experience
recurrence within a year. 13
• D uration: Treat for at least six months and reassess to see if treatment should continue, especially
Recurrence rate
Unprovoked VTE
• The estimated recurrence rate is 7.4% per patient-year after two years of stopping anticoagulation. 12
• Duration: Treat for at least three months. Consider extended treatment. 2
Assess and discuss risks and benefits of extended Aspirin is less effective than anticoagulants, but
treatment with your patients. If extending treatment, more effective than no treatment in preventing
use the same anticoagulant unless there are VTE recurrence. 2,8
reasons for switching, for example, from NOACs
to warfarin when renal function deteriorates. In patients with cancer and progressive disease,
consider their wishes and quality of life before
For those with first unprovoked proximal DVT extending treatment. While LMWH is preferred in
or PE wishing to stop anticoagulation after these patients, consider switching to an oral agent
three months, consider low-dose aspirin unless in patients requiring treatment beyond six months
contraindicated. 2 who wish to stop daily injections. 4
Check for:
Signs and symptoms of bleeding and recurrent VTE
Treatment adherence
Changes in renal or hepatic function
New drug interactions
References
1. Sogaard KK, et al. 30-Year mortality after venous thromboembolism: a population- Expert group
based cohort study. Circulation. 2014.
2. Kearon C, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST Guideline and Lead discussant
Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2016. Dr Chee Yen Lin (NUHS-NCIS)
3. Streiff MB, et al. Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and
pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016.
Chairperson
4. Watson HG, et al. Guideline on aspects of cancer-related venous thrombosis.
BR J Haematol. 2015. A/Prof Ng Heng Joo (SGH)
5. Barnes G, et al. Recommendation on the nomenclature for oral anticoagulants:
communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2015. Group members
6. Kearon C, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy A/Prof Lee Lai Heng (SGH)
and Prevention of Thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-
A/Prof Tay Jam Chin (TTSH)
Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012.
Dr Doreen Tan Su Yin (KTPH)
7. Lim W, et al. Meta-analysis: low-molecular-weight heparin and bleeding in
patients with severe renal insufficiency. Ann Intern Med. 2006. Dr Lim Ziliang (NHGP)
8. Konstantinides SV. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Dr Sim Kok Ping
acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014. (Frontier Healthcare)
9. Lee AY, et al. Low-molecular-weight Heparin versus a Coumarin for the Prevention
of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer. N Engl J Med.
2003.
10. Lee AY, et al. Tinzaparin vs Warfarin for Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism
in Patients With Active Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015.
11. Kearon C, et al. Duration of anticoagulant therapy for deep vein thrombosis and
pulmonary embolism. Blood. 2014.
12. Iorio A, et al. Risk of recurrence after a first episode of symptomatic venous
thromboembolism provoked by a transient risk factor: a systematic review. Arch
Intern Med. 2010.
13. Barnes GD, et al. Venous thromboembolism: Predicting recurrence and the need
for extended anticoagulation. Vasc Med. 2015.
The Agency for Care Effectiveness (ACE) is the national health technology assessment agency in Singapore residing
within the Ministry of Health (MOH). ACE develops evidence-based “Appropriate Care Guides” or ACGs to guide a specific
area of clinical practice. ACGs are aimed at complementing MOH Clinical Practice Guidelines when these are available,
by providing additions and updates as reflected in the evidence at the time of development, and incorporating cost-
effectiveness considerations where relevant. The ACGs are not exhaustive of the subject matter. When using the ACGs,
the responsibility for making decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient remains with the
healthcare professional. This ACG will be reviewed 3 years after publication, or earlier, if new evidence emerges that
requires substantive changes to the recommendations.