5/7/22, 11:55 “Opening up the national debate is already a triumph”: a lowdown on the LUC referendum in Uruguay – Directorio Legislativo

     Español English

LATEST NEWS INSTITUTIONAL  REPORTS CONTACT CIVIC SPACE GUARDIAN

DIRECTORY OF LEGISLATORS

URUGUAY

“Opening up the national debate is already a

triumph”: a lowdown on the LUC referendum in
Uruguay

Any comprehensive assessment of Uruguay’s March 27 referendum – where citizens got the final say over
whether to repeal 135 articles of a new flagship law being pushed by the government – should look
beyond the turnout and the ‘yes vs no’ voting split.  

https://directoriolegislativo.org/en/opening-up-the-national-debate-is-already-a-triumph-a-lowdown-on-the-luc-referendum-in-uruguay/ 1/8
5/7/22, 11:55 “Opening up the national debate is already a triumph”: a lowdown on the LUC referendum in Uruguay – Directorio Legislativo

Rather, it should also consider the symbolic social (and political) mobilization that brought it about in the
first place – putting citizens front and center of a debate impacting situations of competing rights: the right
to protest in the streets and the freedom of movement, the right to strike and the right to go to work.

CIVICUS describes Uruguayan civic space as “open”. Indeed, the country is something of a green outlier
nestled in a continent increasingly beset by social conflict and curbs on civil society (as documented in this
DL report).

And yet there it is. Uruguay. A nation that, for better or worse, resisted lengthy lockdowns during the
worst of the pandemic and where, in contrast to its Latin American neighbors, confidence in democratic
institutions grew in 2021, according to data from Latinobarómetro. But how does this democratic health
relate to the vote, and why, beyond its outcome, does the fact that the referendum was held in the first
place speak so well of Uruguayan civil society influence? We attempt to explore these questions here.

The mother of all laws

The Law of Urgent Consideration – or simply LUC – presented by the government 40 days after Lacalle Pou
came to power, is a broad-spectrum law encompassing much of the president’s government plan.

It is split into 476 articles covering diverse topics – from public security, education, public enterprises and
the economy; to finance, agriculture, social security and labor relations; through to social development,
health and emergency housing.

It entered Parliament with a request for urgent debate. In procedural terms, this meant the legislative
chambers had to analyze it, convene public hearings, propose amendments and vote on it within pre-
established and extremely tight deadlines: 45 days in the chamber of origin (the Senate) and 30 in the
reviewing chamber (the House of Representatives). It is important to note that bills for urgent
consideration may only be submitted by the Executive branch, and that if they are not voted on as
stipulated, they are automatically approved with their original text. 

A unique case? Yes and no. Since the return to democracy in 1985, 13 bills for urgent consideration have
been submitted to the legislature, nine of which approved and four rejected. However, most of them were
not nearly as broad in scope as the present Law. 

Civic freedoms

The passing of the LUC through the legislature and its subsequent enactment came amid numerous,
extensive debates as well as demands and campaigns from different quarters.  Here, we look specifically
at features of the Law posing potential risks to civic space – in particular the right of assembly, protest and
access to public information. We focus on the following six aspects of the Law (for an overview of all the
Law’s articles click here):

https://directoriolegislativo.org/en/opening-up-the-national-debate-is-already-a-triumph-a-lowdown-on-the-luc-referendum-in-uruguay/ 2/8
5/7/22, 11:55 “Opening up the national debate is already a triumph”: a lowdown on the LUC referendum in Uruguay – Directorio Legislativo

1. The introduction of a crime of ‘police aggravation’, in the form of obstructing, attacking, throwing
objects, or threatening and insulting police officers. This carries punishments of 3 to 18 months
imprisonment, with participation of more than three individuals being an aggravating factor (article
11). 
2. The modification of the principle of legitimate self-defense in Article 26 of the Penal Code, by
which persons acting in defense of themselves, others or property are exempt from liability when
the “means used are sufficient and adequate to avert the danger”, and regardless of whether they
have been physically assaulted (Article 1).
3. The banning of picketing when it impedes the free movement of persons, goods or services in
public spaces or in private spaces for public use (article 468), and when it impedes the right to
freedom of work and the running of a private company guaranteed by the State in the event of
union actions that obstruct the entrance to facilities (article 392).

4. Go-ahead for police actions based on “criminal appearance” (article 470).

5. The duty to identify oneself, which applies to all persons when the Police so require and the right
of the latter to take them to police premises in the event of failing to produce identification (Article
50).

6. The confidentiality of all information and records that make up the National Intelligence System
of the State and its personnel regardless of their position (Article 125).

Legislative debate and civil society input

The bill entered the Senate on April 23, 2020. For its debate, special committees were formed in which
representatives of unions, professional entities, universities, civil society organizations and business
chambers were present and gave their views. Among them were the Universidad de la República,
Universidad Tecnológica and Universidad de Montevideo; civil society organizations and networks such as
Nada Crece a la Sombra, El Paso, ASFADIVE, EDUY21, Mujer Ahora, Servicio de Justicia y Paz (SERPAJ),
Centro de Archivos y Acceso a la Información Pública (CAINFO), Asociación Nacional de ONG, Red
Uruguaya de ONGs Ambientalistas; federations of teachers and university students.

It was in this chamber where most of the modifications were introduced, although the House of
Representatives also made some revisions. In the end, thanks to the legislative majority of the five-party
government coalition, the law was approved in under 100 days by 18 votes in favor (out of 30) in the
Senate and 57 out of 98 in the House of Representatives. In the process, the bill lost 25 of its original
articles and had modifications made to 300 others.

A mechanism of direct democracy

Uruguay boasts the most developed and applied direct democracy mechanisms in the region.  Holding
referendums for citizens to be able to challenge laws that have been passed by Parliament, albeit within a
https://directoriolegislativo.org/en/opening-up-the-national-debate-is-already-a-triumph-a-lowdown-on-the-luc-referendum-in-uruguay/ 3/8
5/7/22, 11:55 “Opening up the national debate is already a triumph”: a lowdown on the LUC referendum in Uruguay – Directorio Legislativo

maximum period of one year following their enactment. is among those mechanisms guaranteed by its
Constitution. 

There are two ways for filing a referendum appeal against a law before the Electoral Court: a “short” and a
“long” one. The former consists of gathering the signatures of at least 2% of the total number of registered
voters (around 50,000) within 150 days of the law’s enactment, which if achieved triggers a ‘pre-
referendum’ where voting is voluntary. Only if 25% of the electorate votes yes then the referendum takes
place, and this time the voting is compulsory. The longer process, meanwhile, requires the signatures of
25% of the electorate (about 700,000 people) within one year of the enactment of the law, which if
obtained leads directly to a full referendum.

In this particular case, each option posed challenges, especially in the context of the pandemic. The short
process described above, while easier to instigate, does not, by virtue of relying on voluntary voting,
guarantee that enough people turn up on the day to cast their ballot (previous efforts to overturn laws in
this way have been scuppered by low turnout). However, the alternative of summoning the signatories
necessary to trigger a compulsory referendum outright is itself hugely challenging given the numbers
required and timelines. There was certainly much debate over which of the two mechanisms to opt for.
Eventually the longer, more direct route was chosen. Though even within the Frente Amplio bloc, there
were disagreements on the matter. 

The path to a referendum 

Even before the approval of the LUC, social movements and civil society organizations made their
objections felt through demonstrations and strikes. But how did this ultimately lead to civil society, and
the citizenry at large, joining ranks to take control of the debate? And to what extent did the
aforementioned institutional mechanisms guaranteeing citizens the right to challenge enacted laws, and
the wider political culture, play a role?  

When all is told, this is a story about how, by casting aside their differences, over a 100 social and political
organizations, large and small, joined together in a bid to have a final say over the new Law: first by
creating the National Pro-Referendum Commission, then by agreeing on which referendum mechanism to
pursue, after that by deciding on the articles of the Law to be submitted to a public vote, and then, finally,
by presenting their request to the country’s Electoral Court. 

The highest profile figures offering their support to this campaign were the national workers’ group PIT-
CNT (headed by its president Fernando Pereira, who later became president of the opposition party
Frente Amplio), the Uruguayan Federation of Housing Cooperatives for Mutual Aid (FUCVAM in Spanish),
the Federation of University Students of Uruguay (FEUU in Spanish) and Intersocial feminista – an
umbrella for some 20 feminist collectives and other smaller groups. On the other hand, there was Frente
Amplio. Although it was the Intersocial that initially promoted the referendum, there were parallel debates
within each of these sides to bring positions closer and articulate their decisions.

https://directoriolegislativo.org/en/opening-up-the-national-debate-is-already-a-triumph-a-lowdown-on-the-luc-referendum-in-uruguay/ 4/8
5/7/22, 11:55 “Opening up the national debate is already a triumph”: a lowdown on the LUC referendum in Uruguay – Directorio Legislativo

Race to collect signatures

Just over 670,000 signatures were needed to trigger the referendum. Nearly 800,000 were obtained –
unprecedented in the history of public consultations of this kind. Yet getting there was not easy.

To begin with, the collection campaign began in January 2021 and the deadline for submission was July
(one year after the enactment of the law). Barely six months, then to gather the needed signatures, and
amid a worsening of the pandemic especially between April and May. In view of the government’s refusal
to consider an extension of the constitutional deadline, the campaign rolled on despite the various
challenges. 

The last weeks were the most critical. Four days before the deadline, they were 40,000 signatures short.
Things were looking bleak. Yet they would go on to amass another 165,000 endorsements. How? By
launching a powerful, united and well coordinated call to action mobilizing hundreds and hundreds across
the country’s neighborhoods, even spilling over into other countries. This prompted a late surge in
support and, on July 8, the National Commission duly presented a total of 797,261 signatures to the
Electoral Court. 

Campaigns for ‘Yes and No’

The “Campaign for the Yes” (those in favor of repealing the articles) was launched at the end of October
2021 at an event in Montevideo with the participation of the PIT-CNT, several social organizations, and
political figures of Frente Amplio (including former president José “Pepe” Mujica and the mayors of
Canelones and Montevideo, Yamandú Orsi and Carolina Cosse). The National Pro-Referendum
Commission was renamed “National Commission for the Yes” and the slogan “The LUC is not Uruguay”
took shape. The campaign’s closing ceremony was on March 22, with the transmission on national TV of a
message delivered through the faces and voices of a group of people appealing for a ‘yes’ and for political
preferences to be cast aside.

Although the various organizations behind the “Yes” campaign worked concertedly to woo the public, each
also mobilized its own agenda and, accordingly, focused on particular aspects of the Law. Thus, the trade
union organizations led discussions on the articles impacting labor relations; the feminist groups, on the
effects for women and minorities in vulnerable contexts; the teachers’ and students’ organizations, on
articles linked to education; the human rights organizations, on reforms to the criminal procedure codes,
and so on. In addition, they made formal proposals aimed at the openness and social visibility of public
decision-making processes, including the duration of the legislative debate and spaces for organizations to
voice their views. 

The “Campaign for the No” got underway, officially, on January 31, 2022, but already by September 2021
figures from all the parties of the ruling Multicolor Coalition had participated in what was considered the
first political act supporting the 135 articles. In November, their first promotional videos began to circulate

https://directoriolegislativo.org/en/opening-up-the-national-debate-is-already-a-triumph-a-lowdown-on-the-luc-referendum-in-uruguay/ 5/8
5/7/22, 11:55 “Opening up the national debate is already a triumph”: a lowdown on the LUC referendum in Uruguay – Directorio Legislativo

under the slogan “Defend your freedom“, which would later become a staple of the campaign. The wind-
down came on March 23 during a nationally televised press conference attended only by President Luis
Lacalle Pou.

What were the “No” campaign’s arguments? That the law reflected popular demands; that it had been
debated, modified and approved by a wide margin in Congress; and that since its entry into force in July
2020, it had not had the negative consequences alleged by its detractors, but rather positive ones as
predicted by the government, such as halting the rise in crime.

It is worth mentioning that in the lead-up to the referendum, several debates on the Law were shown by
public media. The first one was held on February 23, 2022 by senators Oscar Andrade (Frente Amplio) and
Guido Manini Ríos (Cabildo Abierto) and focused on security, education, housing and labor relations. On
March 7, senators Mario Bergara (Frente Amplio) and Gustavo Penadés (Partido Nacional) presented
arguments for and against the articles on education, security, housing and financial freedom.

There were several others, including a series of discussions on Law’s impact on the economy, housing and
education organized by Universidad Nacional de la República with the support of TV Ciudad on March 21
and 22.

Half and half 

Of the total of 2,215,906 valid votes cast, the No vote obtained 1,108,360 (50%) and the Yes vote 1,078,425
(48.7%) and there were 29,121 blank votes that counted as No’s. (In addition, there were over 82,000
annulled votes, something which in itself merits discussion). As a consequence, therefore, the 135 articles
of the government’s controversial Law are to remain in force. 

Considered at the departmental level, the Yes campaign obtained its best results in Montevideo (53.4% vs.
40.8%), Paysandú (48.0% vs. 44.4%) and Canelones (50.7% vs. 43.1%), and the worst in Artigas (30.3% vs.
62.8%) and Rivera (24.1% vs. 69.7%). This marks a pronounced cleavage between the capital and the
interior of the country. 

This election has been interpreted by many media outlets as a de facto referendum on Lacalle Pou’s
administration, which currently has an approval rating of just over 50% (see this DL report), and a stress
test for the Multicolor coalition following internal tensions. The fact that the president was the only visible
face at the ‘No’ campaign closing event certainly opens the door to these interpretations while showing
how important the result was for the government.

However, the unprecedented collection of 800,000 signatures, the high voter turnout of 85% and the small
margin that settled the election – much tighter than that predicted by polls in January and February – is
also a sign of how ordinary Uruguayans ended up effectively ‘owning’ the debate,  which transcended the
legislature and political divides and mobilized the whole of society. This also sets the tone for the

https://directoriolegislativo.org/en/opening-up-the-national-debate-is-already-a-triumph-a-lowdown-on-the-luc-referendum-in-uruguay/ 6/8
5/7/22, 11:55 “Opening up the national debate is already a triumph”: a lowdown on the LUC referendum in Uruguay – Directorio Legislativo

important legislative debates to come, among them over media and social security reforms backed by the
government.

In the words of the ‘Yes campaign’: “the great problems of the country must be discussed among us all”.
The referendum allowed for that – for citizens to, in effect, legislate for themselves.

MOST READ

How Nayib Bukele is becoming “the world’s coolest dictator”

With 94.76% of the votes counted and by a slim margin, Pedro Castillo is set to
be the next president of Peru for the period 2021-2026

Respond. Recover. Renew

REPORT CATEGORIES

Legislative Work 2 informes

Political Analisys 38 informes

Directorio Legislativo is a civil society organization based in Argentina and the United States that has been working for more
than ten years to strengthen democratic institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean.

BUENOS AIRES (ARGENTINA)

+54 11 5218 - 4647
https://directoriolegislativo.org/en/opening-up-the-national-debate-is-already-a-triumph-a-lowdown-on-the-luc-referendum-in-uruguay/ 7/8
5/7/22, 11:55 “Opening up the national debate is already a triumph”: a lowdown on the LUC referendum in Uruguay – Directorio Legislativo

WASHINGTON DC (USA)

+1 (786) 828-0675

     

Receive our newsletters and other digital products.

SUBSCRIBE

Web site development by TINTAPIXEL

https://directoriolegislativo.org/en/opening-up-the-national-debate-is-already-a-triumph-a-lowdown-on-the-luc-referendum-in-uruguay/ 8/8