Professional Documents
Culture Documents
16 Cranes in A Marine Environment
16 Cranes in A Marine Environment
16 Cranes in A Marine Environment
Module Summary
– Juliana Bridge, Alphen aan den Rijn, August 2015 – Lifting of personnel.
– Juliana Bridge, The lift plan step 1 – Lifting of personnel
– Juliana Bridge, The lift plan step 2 – LOLER lifting operations and lifting equipment
– Juliana Bridge, how it was executed. regulations
– Juliana Bridge, conclusions from the Dutch Safety – IMCA Guidelines for Lifting Operation
Board – Equipment Selection
– Differences between land and marine and – Possible safety measures to be considered
offshore cranes. – Degrading lifting curves
– Dynamic Amplification Factors (DAF) in air – Down graded lifting curves depending on Hs
– DAF in water lifting through the splash zone – Barge limitations:
– Lifting through the splash zone – Local deck strength
– Lifting through the splash zone, slamming. – Environmental limitations
– Lifting through the splash zone; varying buoyancy – Limitations on the workability:
– Lifting through the splash zone; inertia force – Risk assessment (1)
– Lifting through the splash zone; drag and friction. – Risk assessment (2)
– Lifting through the splash zone
– Lifting through the splash zone; what method to
use?
– Do we need a lift plan?
Our own calculations showed that stability was to small to work with but did not show that the system
would capsize so why does the Dutch Safety Board concludes that “even when the lifting calculations
had been carried out faultlessly, an accident could not have been avoided.” The flexibility of the crane
has a negative impact to the stability of the barge.
You CAN NOT compensate for heel by ballasting when GM is close to 0m
The flexibility of the telescopic crane boom works a spring that controls the cog of the cargo. As a result,
the CoG of the cargo does
not appear at the top of the
Effect on cargo shift when secured by
crane but higher.
springs In this case it was about
12m resulting in a GM
reduction of 1m
The dynamic load is a load is subject to additional dynamic forces such as: in
water and going through the splash zone. These loads are affected by the
shape, size, weight, contents, vessel motions etc. Going through the splash
The DAF should for major offshore lifts be established on the basis of a zone
dynamic analysis, considering the effects in.
DNV-GL considers as minimum factors for lifts:
SHL (Static Hook ONSHORE INSHORE OFFSHORE
Load) From Quay to From crane vessel to barge/ship in from barge/ship
barge/ship. sheltered waters to a fixed platform
3 – 100 t 1.10 1.07+0.05 100/SHL 1+0.25 100/SHL
100 - 300 t 1.05 1.12 1.25
300 - 1000 t 1.05 1.10 1.20
1000 - 2500 t 1.03 1.08 1.15
> 2500 t 1.03 1.05 1.10
May 20, 2021 www.seacamel.com 9
Time
0
Complex
Yes, any lift offshore needs to be planned. A lifting operation involves storing and releasing
energy and always contains risks. By planning the lift, we can:
– Ensure that the risk are assessed, controlled and if possible eliminated.
– Give time to consider how?
– Find suitable equipment and competent persons
– Get responsibilities clear
– Evaluate interference with other operations
(SIMOPS)
Lifting of personnel
International
Marine
Contractors
Association
Free floating
– intact stability condition
– Sailing condition (boom down)
– Lifting condition (boom up with load in the hook)
• Stability range
• Wind overturning moment
• GM value
JB-117 Self
• static heel due to wind Elevating
• Static heel due to load Platform
• Crane limitations (heel max 3 deg)
Jack-up:
– Maximum leg loads during crane movements of any kind
– Soil conditions
Spud Leg Barges Lastdrager 6 with Mammoet
– maximum leg loads during crane movements of any kind, crane
– dynamic leg loads due to waves and wind
Structural strength
– Local
– Global
Efficient communication
between parties involved
Operations to be executed in
workable environmental
conditions
possible
unlikely
unlikely
likely
likely
very
very
1 Very high Fatality(s), terminal lung potentially harms or adversely affects >$1m 1 1 1 2 3
disease or permanent the general public and has the
debility potential for widespread concern
regarding the company’s operations.
Can have a serious economic liability
on the business
2 High Serious injury, poisoning, potentially harms or adversely affects >$250,000 1 1 2 2 3
sensitisation or dangerous employees and the environment at
infection the worksite. Requires specialist
expertise or resources for correction
3 Moderate Injury leading to a lost time potentially harms or adversely affects >$50,000 1 2 2 3 3
accident or persistent employees and the environment at
dermatitis or acne the worksite. Requires general
expertise or resources for correction
4 Slight Minor injury requiring first presents limited harm to the >$10,000 2 2 3 3 3
aid treatment or headache, environment and requires general
nausea, dizziness, mild expertise or resources for correction
rashes
5 Negligible Negligible injury or health presents limited harm to the >$10,000 2 3 3 3 3
implications, no absence environment
from work and requires minor corrective action
May 20, 2021 www.seacamel.com 35
In addition, there is the Equipment Risk Assessment which is part of the JRA.
Keywords to help with the q operator protection; q access and egress arrangements,
equipment risk assessment are q environmental conditions; particularly in emergency situ
q Is the equipment designed for q location/proximity/environment q overturning and overloading;
this type of lift? al hazards; q other emergency situations;
q Have any modifications been q the nature of the anticipated q maintenance and inspection
made to the equipment? load(s) (e.g. hazardous or requirements whilst in use;
q Could alarm settings require dangerous substances); q dismantling and storage
attention, e.g. if changes have q whether it involves lifting of requirements;
been made to wire rope length persons; q transportation methods for
on drums? q means of attaching/detaching continued integrity.
q strength and stability of lifting and securing loads;
equipment, rigging and load; q loading and set-down
q ergonomic considerations; arrangements;