Design Manual

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT
STANDARD DESIGN CALCULATION OF A
FLOATING ROOF TANK 33M  X 20M HT.
Page 1 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
DESIGN DATA:
Design Code - API 650 – 11th Edition June 2007

Type of Tank - Single Deck(Pontoon Type) floating roof
Tank Dimension
Diameter(Internal) - 33M
Height - 20M
Capacity(Nominal) - 15823KL
Material of Construction - IS 2062 Gr.B
(Plates)
Operating temp - Ambient
Design temp. - 65oC
Product Stored - HSD-Class B
Sp. Gt. Of product - 0.87
Design Sp. Gt. - 0.87
Wind Pressure - As per IS 875
Sesmic Coefficient - As per IS 1893
Corrosion Allowance
Bottom - 1.5MM
Shell - 1.5MM
Roof - 1MM for Wetted Parts
- Nil for Non Wetted Parts
Structurals - Nil
Location - Ennore
Page 2 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
Allowable Stress:
Material - IS 2062 Gr B
Yield Strength - 250 Mpa
Tensile Strength - 410 MPa
As per CL 5.6.2.1 of API 650 (2007), the allowable stress for design condition S d
shall be minimum of
2/3 Yield Strength = 166.66 Mpa
(or)
2/5 Tensile Strength = 164 Mpa
Therefore, Sd = 164 Mpa is adopted.

As per CL 5.6.2.2 of API 650 (2007), the allowable stress for Hydro-static test
stress St shall be minimum of
3/4 Yield Strength = 187.50 Mpa
(or)
3/7 Tensile Strength = 175.71 Mpa
Therefore, St = 175.71 Mpa is adopted.
Page 3 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
Bottom Plate Thickness:

As per CL. No.5.4.1, the minimum thickness of bottom plates shall be
6mm + CA = 6 + 1.5 = 7.5mm
As per CL. No.5.5.3, the minimum thickness of Annular plates shall be
6mm + CA = 6 + 1.5 = 7.5mm
Provided
Annular plates - 12mm
Bottom plates - 10mm
Hence Safe
As per CL. No.5.5.2, the minimum permissible radial width of Annular Plate
should be atleast 600 mm (or)
215tb
(HG)0.5
Which ever is greater
Where tb = Thickness of annular plates = 12 mm
H = Height of the tank = 20 mm
G = Design Sp.Gt = 0.87
215tb = 215 * 12 = 619mm

(HG)0.5 (20*0.87)0.5
Therefore, Min radial width of
Annular plate required = 619 mm
Provided = 1874 mm
Hence ok
Page 4 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
Thickness of Shell Plates: (One Foot Method)
One Foot Method can be employed upto 60 m diameter
As per CL.No.5.6.3, the minimum shell thickness shall be greater of the value for
td & tt calculated by the following equations.
td = 4.9D(H-0.3)G + CA
Sd
&
tt = 4.9D(H-0.3)
St
td = Design shell thickness – in mm
tt = Hydro-static test shell thickness – in mm
D = Nominal diameter of tank – 33.020mm
(Centreline dia. of bottom shell course plate)
(Refer foot note 1 of Cl.No.5.6.1.1)
H = Design Liquid level in Meter (from the bottom of shell course
under consideration to the top of shell)
G = Design sp.gt. of liquid = 0.87
CA = Corrosion Allowance = 1.5mm
Sd = Allowable stress in design condition = 164Mpa
St = Allowable stress in test condition = 175.71Mpa
Page 5 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
First Shell Course
td = 4.9D(H-0.3)G + CA
Sd
= 4.9*33.020*(20-0.3)*0.87 + 1.5 = 18.4mm
164
tt = 4.9D(H-0.3)
St
= 4.9*33.020*(20-0.3) = 18.14mm
175.71
Thickness shell not be less than 18.4mm.
Provided 20mm thickness (which is safe)
Similarly the other shell course thickness are calculated considering the
width of all plates 2m and tabulated in Table 1:
Page 6 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
TABLE-1
Courses Width H Td Tt T(provided)

No. (m) (m) (mm) (mm) (mm)
1 2 20 18.41 18.14 20
2 2 18 16.69 16.30 18
3 2 16 14.98 14.46 16
4 2 14 13.26 12.62 14
5 2 12 11.54 10.77 12
6 2 10 9.83 8.93 10
7 2 8 8.11 7.09 10
8 2 6 6.39 5.25 8
9 2 4 4.68 3.41 8
10 2 2 2.96 1.57 8
As per CL.No.5.6.1.1 of API 650(2007) minimum thickness to be provided for

tanks 15 to <36 dia is 6mm including corrosion allowance.However provided
8mm thick plate(minimum) which is safe & give greater ease of welding upper
wind girders which is also used as walkway platform.
Stiffening Rings
a) Curb Angle
As per CL No.5.9.3.2, the minimum size of curb angle is to be provided is
75x75x6 for shells more than 5mm or equivalent section modulus.
Provided Curb Angle 75x75x8mm.
Page 7 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
b) Top Wind Girder

The wind velocity at Ennore Vb = 50 m/s = 180 km/hr
(As per IS 875)
As per CL.5.3 of IS 875
The risk coefficient K1 = 1.08
(Refer Table 1 of IS 875)
Terrain, Height and structurals x Size factor K2 = 1.12
(Refer table 2 of IS 875 )
Topography factor K3 = 1
Design Wind Speed V = Vb * K1 * K2 * K3
= 180*1.08*1.12*1
= 217.7 km/hr
As per CL.No.5.9.6.1 of API 650(2007)
The minimum section modulus of top wind girder is
Z(reqd.) = D2H2 * (V/190)2
17
D = Nominal Diameter of tank = 33.020 m
H2 = Height of tank shell = 20 m
Z(reqd.) = 33.0202 * 20 * (217.7/190)2 = 1684 cm3
17
Now,
Page 8 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
I = Moment of inertia = 86956 cm4

Z(provided) = I/41.8 = 2080 cm3
Z(provided) > Z(reqd.)
Hence Safe
Stability of shell below primary wind girder

As per CL.No.5.9.7.1 of API 650(2007), the maximum height of unstiffened
shell,H1 , shall be
H1 = 9.47t ((t/D)3 )* (190/V)2
Where t is the corroded thickness of top shell course = 6.5 mm
H1 = 9.47 * 6.5 * ((6.5/33.020)3) * (190/217.7)2 = 4.1 m
Transposed Height of Shell

As per CL.No.5.9.7.2 of API 650(2007), the transposed width of various shells
are calculated as follows.
Wtr = W ((tuniform/tactual)5)
Where,
Wtr = Transposed shell width
W = Actual shell width
tuniform = Corroded thickness of top shell course = 6.5 mm
tactual = Corroded thickness of the transposed shell (Refer Table)
Page 9 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
Wtr of various shells below the primary wind girder are tabulated below
tactual W Wtr Transposed
(m) (m) height
 Wtr(m)
6.5 4.9 4.9 4.9
8.5 4 2 6.9
10.5 2 0.6 7.5
12.5 2 0.39 7.89
14.5 2 0.27 8.16
16.5 2 0.19 8.35
18.5 2 0.14 8.49
Since H1 is less than the transposed height of the shell, a secondary wind girder
to be provided at a distance of maximum 4.1 m (transposed height) below the
primary wind girder.
Stability of shell below Secondary wind girder

As per CL.No.5.9.7.1 of API 650(2007), the maximum height of unstiffened shell
H1 shall be
H1 = 9.47t ((t/D)3 )* (190/V)2
H1 = 9.47 * 6.5 * ((6.5/33.020)3) * (190/217.7)2 = 4.1 m
Transposed height of Shell below secondary wind girder

Wtr of various shells below the secondary wind girder are tabulated below
Page 10 of 27
Date: 18/02/09

(m) (m) height
 Wtr(m)
6.5 0.8 0.8 0.8
8.5 4 2 2.8
10.5 2 0.6 3.4
12.5 2 0.39 3.79
14.5 2 0.27 4.06
16.5 2 0.19 4.25
18.5 2 0.14 4.39
Since H1 is less than the transposed height of the shell, a secondary wind girder
to be provided at a distance of maximum 4.1 m (transposed height) below the
secondary wind girder.
Stability of shell below Secondary wind girder

As per CL.No.5.9.7.1 of API 650(2007), the maximum height of unstiffened shell
H1 shall be
H1 = 9.47t ((t/D)3 )* (190/V)2
H1 = 9.47 * 6.5 * ((6.5/33.020)3) * (190/217.7)2 = 4.1 m
Transposed height of Shell below secondary wind girder
Wtr of various shells below the secondary wind girder are tabulated below
Page 11 of 27
Date: 18/02/09

(m) (m) height
 Wtr(m)
8.5 0.7 0.35 0.35
10.5 2 0.6 0.95
12.5 2 0.39 1.34
14.5 2 0.27 1.61
16.5 2 0.19 1.8
18.5 2 0.14 1.94
Since H1 is more than the transposed height of the shell, Hence no more
secondary wind girder is required.
The minimum section modulus required for the secondary wind girders Z
is
(Note: Same sections are adapted for both the wind girders)
Z(reqd.) = D2H1 * (V/190)2
17
D = Nominal Diameter of tank = 33.020 m
H1 = Unstiffened height of tank shell = 4.1 m
Z(reqd.) = 33.0202 * 4.1 * (217.7/190)2 = 345 cm3
17
Now,
Page 12 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
I = Moment of inertia = 7943.2 cm4

Z(min) = I/15.8 = 502 cm3
Z(provided) > Z(reqd.)
Hence Safe
Wind load on tanks (Overturning Stability):

Reference CL. No. 3.11 of API 650 (1998) 10 th Edition
As per IS 875, the wind velocity at Ennore is 50 m/s = 180 km/hr.
As per CL.5.3 of IS 875
The risk coefficient K1 = 1.08
(Refer Table 1 of IS 875)
Terrain, Height and structurals x Size factor K2 = 1.12
(Refer table 2 of IS 875 )
Topography factor K3 = 1
Design Wind Speed V = Vb * K1 * K2 * K3
= 180*1.08*1.12*1
= 217.7 km/hr
 Wind velocity correction factor C = {V/190}2 = {217.7/190}2 = 1.31
Wind load on the projected area of the shell = 0.86 Kpa
Projected area of shell = 33.04 x 20 = 660.8 m 2
Page 13 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
 Wind load on the shell = 1.31 x 0.86 x 660.8 = 744.45 KN

Add 10% for structurals & misc. items = 74.4 KN
Total wind load P = 818.85 KN
Overturning moment due to wind load
M = P x (H/2) = 818.85 x (20/2) = 8189 KNm
As per CL.No.3.11.2 of API 650(1998) ,the overturning moment due to wind M

Should be < 2/3 {WD/2}
Where W is the dead weight of shell available to resist any uplift
D = Diameter of the tank.
Weight of shell = 180000 kg (Corroded)
Weight of wind girder structurals etc.
Supported by the shell (Corroded) = 11000 Kg
Total dead weight available = 191000 Kg = 1874 KN
2/3 {WD/2} = 2/3 {1874 x 33.02/2} = 20620 KNm
M < 2/3 {WD/2}
Hence Safe
Page 14 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
Seismic Design:
As per Appendix E 3.1 of API 650 (1998) 10th Edition,the overturning moment
due to seismic forces applied to the bottom of shell.
M = ZI(C1WSXS+C1WrHt+C1W1X1+C2W2X2)
M = Overturning Moment applied to the bottom of the tank shell, N-m
Z = Seismic zone factor(horizontal seismic acceleration) = 0.2(As per IS 1893).
I = Importance factor.
C1C2 = Lateral earthquake force coefficients.
WS = Total weight of the shell,= 225000 Kg = 2207 KN
XS = Height from the bottom of shell to shell’s center of gravity, m
Wr = Total weight of the tank roof = 95 MT = 932 KN
Ht = Total height of tank shell, m
W1 = Weight of the effective mass of tank contents that move
in unison with shell, N
X1 = Height from the bottom of shell to centroid of lateral
seismic force applied to W1, m
W2 = Weight of the effective mass of tank contents that move in the first
sloshing mode, N
X2 = Height from the bottom of shell to centroid of lateral seismic force
applied to W2, m
Effective mass of tank contents (CL E 3.2)
From fig. E – 2 for D = 33.02 = 1.78

H 18.5
W1 = 0.6
WT
Page 15 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
W2 = 0.4
WT
Where
WT = Total weight of tank contents = 135045 KN
Therefore W1 = 135045 x 0.6 = 81027 KN
W2 = 135045 x 0.4 = 54018 KN
From fig. E – 3 for D = 33.02 = 1.78

H 18.5
X1 = 0.39
H
X2 = 0.61
H
Therefore X1 = 18.5 x 0.39 = 7.215 KN

X2 = 18.5 x 0.61 = 11.285 KN
Lateral force coefficient (CL.E 3.3)

From CL. No.E 3.3.1 C1 = 0.6
From CL. No.E 3.3.2 C2 = 3.375 S

2
T
Where S = Site coefficient = 1.5
0.5
T = Natural period of the first sloshing mode in seconds = 1.81 K (D )
K = 0.59 From fig. E4
0.5
Therefore T = 1.81 x 0.59 x (33.02 ) = 6.14 sec.
C2 = 3.375 S = 3.375 x 1.5 = 0.134

2 2
T 6.14
Page 16 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
Therefore M = 0.2 x 1(0.6 x 2207 x 8.02 + 0.6 x 932 x 20 + 0.6 x 81027 x 7.215 +
0.134 x 54018 x 11.285)
= 90851 KNm
Resistance to overturning (E-4)

As per CL.No.E 4.1
WL = 99tb (Fby GH)

Where,
WL = maximum weight of the tanks contents that may be used to resist the shell
overturning moment, in N/m of shell circumference.
tb = Thickness of the bottom plate under shell, mm
Fby = Minimum specified yield strength of bottom plate under the shell = 250 Mpa
G = Design specific gravity of the liquid to be stored = 0.87
H = Maximum design liquid level = 18.5 m
D = Nominal tank dia. = 33.02 m
Therefore WL = 99 x 12 (250 x 0.87 x 18.5)

= 75358 N/m = 75.358 KN/m
As per CL.No. E 4.1, WL should not exceed 196GHD = 196 x 0.87 x 18.5 x 33.02
= 104166 N/m
Therefore WL = 75358 N/m
Shell Compression (CL.No.E5)

Wt = Weight of tank shell of shell circumference = 2207 = 21.27 KN/m
 x 33.02
M/[D2(Wt + WL)]
= 90851/[33.022 (21.27 + 75.358)] = 0.86 > 0.785
b + WL the value of the following parameter is obtained from fig. E-5

Wt + WL
b + WL = 2.1
Wt + WL
Page 17 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
b = 2.1(21.27 + 75.358) - 75.358

b = 127.5 KN/m
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COMPRESSION (CL.No.E 5)
G = Design specific gravity of the liquid to be stored = 0.87

H = Maximum design liquid level = 18.5 m
D = Nominal tank dia. = 33.02 m
t = Thickness of bottom shell course excluding C.A = 18.5 mm
Therefore GHD2/t2 = 0.87 x 18.5 x 33.022 = 51.27

18.52
for GHD2/t2 > 44,
Fa = 83t = 83 x 18.5 = 46.5 MPa

D 33.02
Where Fa = Maximum allowable longitudinal compressive stress in shell
As per CL.No.E 5.3, Fa shall be lesser of 0.5 Fty or 83t + 7.5 GH
2.5D
Where Fty=minimum specified yield strength of the bottom shell course= 250Mpa
Therefore 0.5 Fty = 125 Mpa
Therefore Fa = 46.5 Mpa
Maximum longitudinal compressive stress = b = 127.5 = 6.89 Mpa

1000t 1000 x 18.5
= 6.89 Mpa
Therefore, b < Fa
1000t
Hence safe
Page 18 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
DESIGN OF FLOATING ROOF
STORED PRODUCT = HSD
SP. GR. OF PRODUCT = 0.87
Page 19 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
TYP. PONTOON SECTION

FIG. – F1
Nos. of Compartment = 40
Nos. of Pontoon support legs = 20
Nos. of Deck support legs = 22
WEIGHT CALCULATION
a) At Deck area
1) Centre Ring Plate = 0.552 M/T
2) Deck Plate = 29.043 M/T
3) Deck Support Legs = 1.952 M/T
4)Deck Appurtenances = 1.5 M/T
5) Rolling Ladder = 0.9 M/T
Total(WD) (approx.) = 33.947 M/T
Page 20 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
b)At Pontoon area

1) Pontoon Ring = 32.67 M/T
2) Pontoon Stiffening Rings = 3.094 M/T
3) Pontoon Support Legs = 1.481 M/T
4) Pontoon Appurtenances = 2.306 M/T
5) Rim Seal = 5.494 M/T
6) Foam Dam = 2.786 M/T
Total(WP) (approx.) = 47.831 M/T
Total weight of roof (WR) (approx.) = 33.947 + 47.831
= 81.782 M/T
Normal condition – (No Rupture/No water/Product sp. Gr. = 0.87)

R1 = Outer Radius of Pontoon = 16.3 m
R2 = Inner Radius of Pontoon = 14.05 m
Volume of seal ring below the deck
=  x (R12- R22) x 0.246
=  x (16.32 - 14.052) x 0.246
= 52.774 m3
Buoyancy of seal ring below the deck plate
Bsr = 52.774 x 0.87
Bsr = 45.914 M/T
Let ‘h1’ be the height of product at ‘Rim space’ from the bottom of deck plate.
Now,  x (R12) x h1 x Sp.Gr. = (WR - Bsr)
 x (16.32) x h1 x 0.87 = (81.782 - 45.914)
Hence , h1 = 0.049392 m = 49.392 mm
So ,the actual height of liquid above the deck plate
= 49.392 – 6.0
= 43.392 mm
Normal Floatation – for sp. Gr. = 0.7
Buoyancy of seal ring below the deck plate
Bsr = 52.774 x 0.7
Bsr = 36.942 M/T
Let ‘h1’ be the height of product at ‘Rim space’ from the bottom of deck plate.
Now,  x (R12) x h1 x Sp.Gr. = (WR - Bsr)
 x (16.32) x h1 x 0.7 = (81.782 - 36.942)
Hence , h1 = 0.076742 m = 76.742 mm
So ,the actual height of liquid above the deck plate
Page 21 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
= 76.742– 6.0
= 70.742 mm
10 inch Rainfall Condition (During Hydrotest) (Refer fig. F-3)

Total Volume of Water, V0 = /4 x 33.02 x 0.254
= 217.245 m3
Distance between top of deck plate to bottom of pontoon bottom plate at attachment
point = 246 mm
Assume deflection of deck plate, Ycl = 192 mm (upto bottom of deck plate)
Weight of Pontoon area(WP) = 47.833 M/T
Weight of Deck area(WD) = 33.948 M/T
Weight of Water(WW) = 217.245 M/T
Total Weight = 299.028 M/T
Volume of deflected deck (assuming semi- ellipsoidal shape)

V2 = 2/3 x  x 14.052 x Ycl
= 2/3 x  x 14.052 x 0.192
= 79.380 m3
V1 = V0 - V2 = 137.865 m3
V3 = 1/3 x  x 14.052 x Ycl

= 1/3 x  x 14.052 x 0.192
= 39.69 m3
V4 =  x 14.052 x (0.246 – 0.192)

= 33.488 m3
pw = (V3 + V4) x 1.0 (Sp. Gr.) = 73.178 T
Page 22 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
FIG : F-2
FIG : F-3
Upward pressure at x – x level for entire roof

P0 = (WP + WD + WW) + pw
Page 23 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
 x R12
P0 = (47.833 + 33.948 + 217.245) + 73.178

 x 16.32
= 0.4459 T/m2
Downward pressure at x – x level for deck portion only

P1 = (WD + WW) + pw
 x R22
P1 = (33.948 + 217.245) + 73.178

 x 14.052
= 0.5230 T/m2
Resultant downward pressure acting on deck causing deflection

p’ = p1 - p0
= 0.5230 - 0.4459 = 0.0771 T/m2
From large deflection theory of plate we have maximum deflection at the centre.
Y1 = 0.662 x a[ p’ x a/E x tD]n
Where ,
a = radius at deck = 14.05 m
E = Youngs Modulus = 20470000 T/m2
tD = thk. Of deck plate = 0.006 m
n = 1/3
Y1 = 0.662 x a[ p’ x a/E x tD]n

Y1 =192 mm = Ycl
Hence O.K
Hy = Height of liquid at rim space from bottom of pontoon bottom plate.
Hy = p0/Sp.Gr. = 0.4459/1.0 = 0.4459 m
Height of water at the rim spaces from top of pontoon bottom plate
0.4459 – 0.006 = 0.4399 m  440 mm
< 0.7 x 800 (Outer rim ht.) = 560 mm
Page 24 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
Hence O.K
Tilt calculation for Punctured Deck & 2 out of 40 Pontoon Compartments Punc-
tured during Hydrotest.
R1 = 16.3 m ; R2 = 14.05 m ; Rmid = 15.175 m ; w = 2.25 m ;

 =  (38/40) = 2.985 rad. = 171
FIG : F-4
Where,
n = No. of compt. = 40
Page 25 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
 = Half of the included angle of 38 nos. compt. Only

Xc = Distance of the center of buoyancy
I = Moment of Inertia
SA = Section Modulus at point “A”
Wt. Of Roof = 81.782 M/T

Buoyancy produced by submerged deck =  x 14.052 x 0.006 x 1 = 3.72 M/T
Effective wt. of roof , w = 81.782 – 3.72 = 78.061 M/T
Xc = 2 x (16.33 – 14.053 ) x sin171

3 x 2.985 x (16.32 – 14.052)
= 0.7968 m
Moment of Inertia
I = 15.1753 x 2.25(2.985+sin171 cos171 - 2sin2171/2.985) = 22208.115 m4
Modulus ,SA = 22208.115 = 1298.958 m3

(16.3 + 0.7968)
Moment , M = 78.061 x 0.7968 = 62.203 T-m
Area of 38 nos. of compartments

A(38) =  {(16.32 – 14.052)} x 38/40
= 203.804 m2
So, W = 78.061 = 0.383 T/m2

A 203.804
M = 62.203 = 0.0478 T/m2

SA 1298.958
Depth of immersion at ‘A’ (as shown in Fig – 4)

= 0.383 + 0.0478 = 0.43 m = 430 mm
Depth of immersion at ‘B’ (as shown in Fig – 4)
= 0.43 x (16.3 + 0.7968) – 2.25 = 0.299 m
(16.3 + 0.7968)
Height of water at inner rim of pontoon from top of pontoon bottom plate
0.299 – 0.006 = 0.293 m = 293 mm
Page 26 of 27
Date: 18/02/09
< 0.7 x 660 (Inner Ring Ht.) = 462 mm
Hence O.K
Page 27 of 27
Date: 18/02/09

Design Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

STANDARD DESIGN CALCULATION OF A

FLOATING ROOF TANK 33M  X 20M HT.

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

Design Code - API 650 – 11th Edition June 2007

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

Therefore, Sd = 164 Mpa is adopted.

Therefore, St = 175.71 Mpa is adopted.

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

Bottom Plate Thickness:

215tb = 215 * 12 = 619mm

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

Thickness of Shell Plates: (One Foot Method)

One Foot Method can be employed upto 60 m diameter

td & tt calculated by the following equations.

tt = Hydro-static test shell thickness – in mm

D = Nominal diameter of tank – 33.020mm

(Centreline dia. of bottom shell course plate)

(Refer foot note 1 of Cl.No.5.6.1.1)

H = Design Liquid level in Meter (from the bottom of shell course

under consideration to the top of shell)

G = Design sp.gt. of liquid = 0.87

CA = Corrosion Allowance = 1.5mm

Sd = Allowable stress in design condition = 164Mpa

St = Allowable stress in test condition = 175.71Mpa

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

First Shell Course

Provided 20mm thickness (which is safe)

width of all plates 2m and tabulated in Table 1:

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

Courses Width H Td Tt T(provided)

As per CL.No.5.6.1.1 of API 650(2007) minimum thickness to be provided for

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

b) Top Wind Girder

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

I = Moment of inertia = 86956 cm4

Stability of shell below primary wind girder

Transposed Height of Shell

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

Stability of shell below Secondary wind girder

Transposed height of Shell below secondary wind girder

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

tactual W Wtr Transposed

Stability of shell below Secondary wind girder

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

tactual W Wtr Transposed

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

I = Moment of inertia = 7943.2 cm4

Wind load on tanks (Overturning Stability):

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

 Wind load on the shell = 1.31 x 0.86 x 660.8 = 744.45 KN

As per CL.No.3.11.2 of API 650(1998) ,the overturning moment due to wind M

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

Effective mass of tank contents (CL E 3.2)

From fig. E – 2 for D = 33.02 = 1.78

ENNORE TERMINAL PROJECT

Therefore W1 = 135045 x 0.6 = 81027 KN

W2 = 135045 x 0.4 = 54018 KN

From fig. E – 3 for D = 33.02 = 1.78

Therefore X1 = 18.5 x 0.39 = 7.215 KN

Lateral force coefficient (CL.E 3.3)

From CL. No.E 3.3.2 C2 = 3.375 S