KRA : 1 – CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY

Objective : 1 – Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas.
Category : Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

RPMS Transmutation Table

COT
Means of Verification 5-point Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Rating Quality
scale rating Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
COT Rating Sheet 1 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COT Rating Sheet 2 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Average >> Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 1 | 20
 KRA : 1 – CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY
Objective : 2 – Used research-based knowledge and principles of teaching and learning to enhance professional practice
Category : Non-Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

RPMS Transmutation Table

Means of Verification Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Quality
Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Lesson Plan with annotations identifying the research-based
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
knowledge used as basis for planning / designing the lesson
Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 2 | 20
 KRA : 1 – CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY
Objective : 3 – Displayed proficient use of Mother Tongue, Filipino and English to facilitate teaching and learning
Category : Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

RPMS Transmutation Table

COT
Means of Verification 5-point Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Rating Quality
scale rating Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
COT Rating Sheet 1 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COT Rating Sheet 2 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Average >> Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 3 | 20
 KRA : 1 – CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY
Objectiv : 4 – Used effective verbal and non-verbal classroom communication strategies to support learner understanding,
e participation, engagements to enhance
Category : Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

RPMS Transmutation Table

COT
Means of Verification 5-point Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Rating Quality
scale rating Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
COT Rating Sheet 1 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COT Rating Sheet 2 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Average >> Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 4 | 20
 KRA : 2 – LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
Objectiv : 5 – Established safe and secure learning environments to enhance learning through the consistent implementation of
e policies, guidelines and procedures
Category : Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

RPMS Transmutation Table

COT
Means of Verification 5-point Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Rating Quality
scale rating Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
COT Rating Sheet 1 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COT Rating Sheet 2 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Average >> Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 5 | 20
 KRA : 2 – LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
Objective : 6 – Maintained learning environments that promote fairness, respect, and care to encourage learning
Category : Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

RPMS Transmutation Table

COT
Means of Verification 5-point Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Rating Quality
scale rating Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
COT Rating Sheet 1 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COT Rating Sheet 2 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Average >> Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 6 | 20
 KRA : 2 – LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
Objectiv 7 – Maintained learning environments that nurture and inspire learners to participate, cooperate and collaborate in
:
e continued learning.
Category : Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality
Set : B

RPMS Transmutation Table

COT Rating
Means of Verification 5-point Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
(Indicator 5) Quality
scale rating Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
COT Rating Sheet 1 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COT Rating Sheet 2 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Average >> Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 7 | 20
 KRA : 2 – LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
Objectiv 8 – Applied a range of successful strategies that maintain learning environments that motivate learners to work
:
e productively by assuming responsibility for their own learning
Category : Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality
Set : B

RPMS Transmutation Table

COT Rating
Means of Verification 5-point Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
(Indicator 7) Quality
scale rating Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
COT Rating Sheet 1 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COT Rating Sheet 2 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Average >> Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 8 | 20
 KRA : 3 – DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS, CURRICULUM AND PLANNING, & ASSESSMENT AND
REPORTING
Objectiv 9 – Designed, adapted and implemented teaching strategies that are responsive to learners with disabilities, giftedness
:
e and talents
Category : Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality
B – Teacher Reflection Forms (TRFs) and Certification from the School Head that the ratee’s classes have no identified
Set : learner/s with disabilities, giftedness and/or talents

RPMS Transmutation Table

Means of Verification 5-point Rating Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
scale rating for Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
Teacher Reflection Form (TRF) 1 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Teacher Reflection Form (TRF) 2 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Average >> Poor (1) 1.000-1.499
Note for Set B: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating for Quality, calculate the average
rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted RPMS Rating.

P a g e 9 | 20
 KRA : 3 – DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS, CURRICULUM AND PLANNING, & ASSESSMENT AND
REPORTING
Objectiv
: 10 – Adapted and used culturally appropriate teaching strategies to address the needs of learners from indigenous groups
e
Category : Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality
Set : A – COT Rating sheets / Inter-Observer Agreement Forms

Attach MOVs

RPMS Transmutation Table

COT Rating
Means of Verification 5-point Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
(Indicator 9) Quality
scale rating Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
COT Rating Sheet 1 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
COT Rating Sheet 2 Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Average >> Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 10 | 20
 KRA : 3 – DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS, CURRICULUM AND PLANNING, & ASSESSMENT AND
REPORTING
Objectiv
: 11 – Adapted and implemented learning programs that ensure relevance and responsiveness to the needs of all learners
e
Category : Non-Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

Attach MOVs

RPMS Transmutation Table

Means of Verification Rating for Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
Proof of Evaluation (e.g. accomplished ILMP) on the implementation of Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
adapted / contextualized learning program Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499

P a g e 11 | 20
 Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

KRA : 3 – DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS, CURRICULUM AND PLANNING, & ASSESSMENT AND

REPORTING
Objectiv
: 12 – Utilized assessment data to inform the modification of teaching and learning practices and programs
e
Category : Non-Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

Attach MOVs

RPMS Transmutation Table

Means of Verification Rating Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
for
Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
A list of identified least / most mastered skills based on the frequency of errors / Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

P a g e 12 | 20
correct responses, with corresponding accomplishment report for remedial / Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
enhancement activities. Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

KRA : 4 – COMMUNITY LINKAGES AND PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT & PERSONAL GROWTH AND
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Objectiv
: 13 – Maintained learning environments that are responsive to community contexts
e
Category : Non-Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

Attach MOVs

RPMS Transmutation Table

Means of Verification Rating for Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

P a g e 13 | 20
 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Accomplishment report of a program / project / activity that maintains a
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
learning environment
Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

KRA : 4 – COMMUNITY LINKAGES AND PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT & PERSONAL GROWTH AND
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Objectiv 14 – Reviewed regularly personal teaching practice using existing laws and regulations that apply to the teaching
:
e profession and the responsibilities specified in the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers
Category : Non-Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

Attach MOVs

RPMS Transmutation Table

Means of Verification Rating for Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

P a g e 14 | 20
 Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Personal reflection notes as outputs from participation in review of
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
personal teaching practices in four (4) quarters
Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

KRA : 4 – COMMUNITY LINKAGES AND PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT & PERSONAL GROWTH AND
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Objectiv 15 – Complied with and implemented school policies and procedures consistently to foster harmonious relationships with
:
e learners, parents, and other stakeholders
Category : Non-Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

RPMS Transmutation Table

Means of Verification Rating for Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

P a g e 15 | 20
Proof of participation / involvement in a school-community Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
partnership for the implementation of a school policy / procedure Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
(e.g. certificate as committee member, narrative report Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

KRA : 4 – COMMUNITY LINKAGES AND PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT & PERSONAL GROWTH AND
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Objectiv
: 16 – Applied a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-centered
e
Category : Non-Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

Attach MOVs

RPMS Transmutation Table

Means of Verification
Rating for Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

P a g e 16 | 20
 Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Lesson plan with annotations explaining the application of a learner- Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
centered teaching philosophy (e.g. constructivism) used as a basis Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
for planning / designing Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

KRA : 4 – COMMUNITY LINKAGES AND PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT & PERSONAL GROWTH AND
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Objectiv 17 – Adopted practices that uphold the dignity of teaching as a profession by exhibiting qualities such as caring attitude,
:
e respect and integrity.
Category : Non-Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

RPMS Transmutation Table

Means of Verification
Rating for Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000

P a g e 17 | 20
 Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Documented feedback
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

KRA : 4 – COMMUNITY LINKAGES AND PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT & PERSONAL GROWTH AND
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Objectiv
: 18 – Set professional development goals based on the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
e
Category : Non-Classroom Observable Indicator
Target : Quality

Attach MOVs

Means of Verification RPMS Transmutation Table

P a g e 18 | 20
 Rating for Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Updated IPCRF-Development Plan for Phase 2 of the RPMS Cycle
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

KRA : 5 – PLUS FACTOR

Objective : 19 – Performed various related works / activities that contribute to the teaching – learning process
Category : Plus Factor
Target : Quality

Means of Verification RPMS Transmutation Table

P a g e 19 | 20
 Rating for Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
Quality Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499

Proof of Plus Factor Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499

 Coordinatorship Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
 Participation as technical working group member Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

P a g e 20 | 20