To achieve a better grade (A-/A/A+), ensure that

         The report is free from spelling and grammatical errors (No obvious lapses in punctuation / grammar / spelling)
         The report is free from formatting and referencing errors (Report format is always consistent including heading styles, fonts, margins, blank space, captions, etc.)
         The report is well structured and well written
         Comments are addressed appropriately
         Errors are corrected

Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman

Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science
Final Year Project

Marking Rubrics

Progress Report
Maximum Unacceptable Poor Marginal Average Good Excellent
Criteria CO
Marks (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Problem area is very clearly stated,
Problem area is explicitly
Identification of the Poor description of problem Problem area is quite Problem area is correctly analyzed in depth, covering
4 2 Problem area not discussed identified, described and
problem area clearly stated identified, well formulated dependencies and inter-
analyzed
relationships with other problems
Specific aims and Specific aims and objectives, which
Introduction

objectives are clearly are obviously and unquestionably

Definition of aims and Aims and objectives not Unclear or vague aims and General aims and General aims and
16 8 1 formulated and obviously derived from the identified problem
objectives provided objectives provided objectives provided objectives are well defined
derived from the provided area in introductory section, are
introductory section explicitly and clearly defined

Overview is provided which Project overview of exemplary

Overview lacks important A simple and clear overview Detailed, clearly written and
4 Overview of project 6 Not provided is hard to understand or structure with clear coverage of all
details in some areas of the project structured project overview
lacking important details relevant aspects

A comprehensive review covering a

Limited review with few Sufficient review with mostly Adequate review with
Poor review of very few large number of relevant sources
12 Review of research topic 1 No review of research topic sources or a review which is relevant and reliable closely relevant, reliable
sources which is off topic which are well linked and described
partly off topic sources and reputable sources
in relation to the project scope

Analytical and Critical
12
Literature Review
Sources are evaluated
Various sources are reviewed in
quantitatively or
depth, all relevant and necessary
No analysis of Sources are quite Sources are evaluated qualitatively, discussed in-
Poor analysis of sources is aspects discussed and /or
information/data is evident sufficiently analyzed and quantitatively or qualitatively depth and backed by
evident and poor attempt to evaluated, and experts' opinion
2 and no attempt to critically limited attempt to critically and moderate attempt to experts' opinion and good

thinking critically discuss the analyzed and clear and good

discuss the literature discuss the literature critically discuss the attempt to critically discuss
literature review. attempt to critically discuss the
review. review. literature review. the literature review and
48 literature review and highlight the
highlight the curent gaps in
current gaps in related research.
related research.
A clear structure is obvious,
The structure of the review is very
which allows a reader to
Poor structure; no clear Quite clear structure, but Well structured literature clear which expands a reader's
Structure and coherence No noticeable structure is see relationships and
12 6 relationship between not all sections follow a review where sections are deeper understanding of the topic;
of literature review evident transition between different
sections of the review natural or logical order well connected the content is arranged in
sections; the review content
unquestionable logical order
is complete

Limited references, with Sufficient number of Huge number of relevant, cutting

No relevant references Large number of relevant
12 References 7 No references provided questionable quality or relevant and reliable edge and wide variety of reputable
provided and reputable references
relevance references references

Methodology is clearly
Methodology is described in very
Methodology is well described providing all
Methodology & Project Management

Quite sufficient description clear unquestionable manner to

Methodology of the
8 3
project**
20
Planning and managing
12 8 allocation is poor and
of project activities
Incomplete description of
No description of project's
methodology and not
methodology
aligned with the objectives
Planning or resource
No evidence of project
planning
obviously insufficient
of methodology and
somewhat aligned with the
objectives
Main tasks are identified,
but resource (time, cost,
material etc.) allocation is
insufficient
described providing basic
information to carry out a
project and aligned with the
objectives
Main tasks are well
identified and resources
(time, cost, material etc.)
allocated
necessary information to
provide all necessary details to
carry out a project and
repeat it and obtain reproducible
reproduce the results and
results and completely aligned with
clearly aligned with the
the objectives
objectives
All tasks are clearly
All tasks are clearly identified and
identified and explained;
well explained; all necessary
necessary resource (time,
resources (time, cost, material etc.)
cost, material etc.)
are allocated and clearly justified;
allocation is clearly justified;
all planned tasks/items are achievd
all planned tasks/items are
as planned and successfully
achievd timely

Numerous grammatical or Many obvious grammatical Some obvious grammatical

Few grammatical or spelling A very few grammatical or
spelling errors are present or spelling errors are or spelling errors are
Language: grammar and errors can be found which spelling errors can be
8 6 which cause most part(s) of present which negatively present which affect No grammatical or spelling errors
style does not significantly affect found which does not affect
Report Quality

the report to be effect understandability of understandability of the

the report's quality the report's quality
incomprehensible the report report
16
All citations and
Some of the citations and Most of the citations and
No citation or uses material bibliography are shown All citations and bibliography are
Citation of various Numerous citation and/or bibliography are correct, bibliography are correct,
8 5 from other sources without according to the guidelines shown exactly according to the
sources bibliography errors with a couple of major with a couple of minor
citation with very few minor guidelines, with no errors
errors errors
inaccuracies
100 100
** Methodology of the project - If project's research field/area requires the use of certain standards, this criteria should also be used to indicate the appropriate use of such standards.

Oral Presentation Part 1

Maximum Unacceptable Poor Marginal Average Good Excellent
Criteria CO
Marks (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
A clearly structured
An outstanding presentation of
Structure and Poorly structured Well structured presentation presentation which
No indication of any A disjointed presentation smooth unquestionable structure
20 attractiveness of 6 presentation with erratic which provides good enhances understanding of
structure which is out of logical order and engaging content that captures
presentation topical shifts and jumps understanding of the project the project and engages an
audience
audience
sentation Skill & Style
Presentation Skill & Style Presenter does not make
Poor eye contact with
eye contact, mumbles or Presenter does not make Good interaction with Presenter speaks with Very confident presenter who
audience, voice not very
Preparedness and presentation or is eye contact, is hard to hear, audience, clear-voiced confidence in clear loud speaks and holds himself/herself
16 6 clearly heard, some minor
52 confidence interrupted in some major or constantly interrupts the presentation, with no voice and captures as a professional, completely
interruptions to the
way due to lack of presentation himself/herself interruptions audience's attention capturing audience's attention
presentation
preparation
Very minimal use of Creative presentation tools Novel, unusual, very creative
Presentation tools and/or
presentation tools and/or and/or aids are used that presentation tools used which
Use of presentation tools No presentation tools aids add no value to Presentation tools and/or
16 6 aids, distracts audience or highlight the quality and captures audience's attention and
and visual aids and/or visual aids used understanding of the aids are used appropriately
confuses undertanding of audience's interest to the enhances understanding of the
presentation
the presentation presentation presentation
Detailed straight to the point
Quality of provided Unable to answer Out-of-topic or evasive Partly appropriate answers Thorough, well elaborated and very
24 6 Concise answers provided and yet succinct answers
answers question(s) answers to questions to questions convincing answer provided
provided
Q&A

48
Visibly downcast, upset, or Attentive and adequately Calm, clear and confident Impressive composure as of a
Loses composure during Attentive when taking and
24 Attitude and composure 6 distracted during the Q&A responsive when taking and when taking and answering professional speaker when taking
the Q&A session answering questions
session answering questions questions and answering questions
100 100

Final Report
Maximum Unacceptable Poor Marginal Average Good Excellent
Criteria CO
Marks (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Clearly written description

of the project which can
both stand alone and Impressive, thorough and clearly
provide insight into the composed overview of the project
Description of the project is Overly long, or a disjointed Summarizes the project
significance of various which raises no questions from a
Abstract

hard to understand or abstract which is not by well that enables to

4 4 Overview of the project 6 Not provided aspects of the project; reader; Background, purpose
misses out significant itself sufficient to describe understand the project's
Background, purpose (objectives), methodology, results
information the entire project scope
(objectives), methodology, and concluding remarks are
results and concluding availble in the abstract
remarks are availble in the
abstract
Introduction

Unclear or vague Problem area, aims, and

Problem identification No problem Problem area, aims and Problem area, aims, and Problem area, aims, and objectives
statements regarding objectives are clearly
4 4 and formulation of project 2 identification/area, aims and objectives are quite clearly objectives all well are perfectly formulated, analyzed
problem area and/or aims formulated and explicitly
aims and objectives objectives provided stated formulated and evaluated
and objectives described

A comprehensive review covering a

4 Review of research topic
Poor review of very few
1 No review of research topic
sources which is off topic
Limited review with few Sufficient review with mostly Adequate review with
large number of relevant sources
sources or a review which is relevant and reliable closely relevant, reliable
which are well linked and described
partly off topic sources and reputable sources
in relation to the project scope

Sources are evaluated

Various sources are reviewed in
quantitatively or
depth, all relevant and necessary
Sources are evaluated qualitatively, discussed in-
aspects discussed and /or
quantitatively or qualitatively depth and backed by
No investigation done with Poor investigation of Sufficient investigation of evaluated, experts' opinion
with an attempt to provide experts' opinion; provided
the presented information/data collected information/data collected analyzed, and provided strong
suitable conclusion on the appropriate conclusion on
Literature Review

4 Critical Investigation 4 information/data and no from sources and poor from sources and limited conclusion on the information/data
information/data collected the information/data
attempt to critically discuss attempt to critically discuss attempt to critically discuss collected from sources and clear
from sources and moderate collected from sources and
16 the literature review. the literature review. the literature review. and good attempt to critically
attempt to critically discuss good attempt to critically
discuss the literature review and
the literature review. discuss the literature review
highlight the current gaps in related
and highlight the current
research.
gap in related research

Structure and coherence
4 6
of literature review
4 References
Methodology of the
4 3
project**
Methodology & Project Management
16
Planning and managing
4 8
of project activities
8 Problem solving
Analysis and
12
interpretation of results
Results & Discussions
Solution to a complex
12
44 problem
Presentation and
12
explanation of results
Reproducibility/reliability
8 5
of results
Poor structure; no clear
No noticeable structure is
relationship between
evident
sections of the review
No relevant references
7 No references provided
provided
Incomplete description of
No description of project's
methodology and not
methodology
aligned with the objectives
Planning or resource
No evidence of project
allocation is poor and
planning
obviously insufficient
Main tasks, difficulties and
problems are not Serious difficulties and
4 mentioned; no attempts problems listed, but no
made to solve a complex attempt at solutions
problem
No analysis or interpretation Insufficient analysis or
4 shows sufficient
done interpretation done
Attempted solution do not
No solution shown or no actually achieve the defined
3 project objectives or provides the
attempt at finding a solution project objectives or resolve
the problem
Overuse of area-specific
jargon or misusing area-
Presentation is very specific terms while
6 confusing; no explanation of presenting results, making
results them hard to understand;
insufficient explanation of
results
Clearly misleading or
Unverified claims made
improbable claims made
about results
about results
Quite clear structure, but
not all sections follow a
natural or logical order
Limited references, with
questionable quality or
relevance
Quite sufficient description
of methodology and
somewhat aligned with the
objectives
Main tasks are identified,
but resource (time, cost,
material etc.) allocation is
insufficient
Difficulties and problems
briefly mentioned, with a
brief description of
attempted solutions
Basic analysis and
interpretation done
Proposed solution achieves
some of the project
objectives or partially
resolves the problem
Results are understandable
to those familiar with the
subject area; inadequate
explanation of results
Some results are
improbable; least/weak
attempt made to justify
results using data and/or
documentation
Well structured literature
review where sections are
well connected
Sufficient number of
relevant and reliable
references
Methodology is well
described providing basic
information to carry out a
project and aligned with the
objectives
Main tasks are well
identified and resources
(time, cost, material etc.)
allocated
Difficulties and problems
well described; a detailed
description of adequate
solutions provided
Sufficient analysis and
interpretation of results
competency in the subject
area
Proposed solution
achieves most of the project
objectives or resolves the
problem adequately
All results presented in an
organized manner
supported by substantial
explanation
Results are consistent and
convincing
A clear structure is obvious,
The structure of the review is very
which allows a reader to
clear which expands a reader's
see relationships and
deeper understanding of the topic;
transition between different
the content is arranged in
sections; the review content
unquestionable logical order
is complete
Huge number of relevant, cutting
Large number of relevant
edge and wide variety of reputable
and reputable references
references
Methodology is clearly
Methodology is described in very
described providing all
clear unquestionable manner to
necessary information to
provide all necessary details to
carry out a project and
repeat it and obtain reproducible
reproduce the results and
results and completely aligned with
clearly aligned with the
the objectives
objectives
All tasks are clearly
All tasks are clearly identified and
identified and explained;
well explained; all necessary
necessary resource (time,
resources (time, cost, material etc.)
cost, material etc.)
are allocated and clearly justified;
allocation is clearly justified;
all planned tasks/items are achievd
all planned tasks/items are
as planned and successfully
achievd timely
Difficulties and problems Difficulties and problems are
clearly described; an described in very clear manner; the
optimal solution is explicitly best solution to a problem is
described and investigated described accurately and verified
appropriately thoroughly
Very detailed and in-depth analysis
Detailed in-depth analysis
and interpretation of results done
and interpretation of results
which greatly expands reader's
shows strong competency
understanding of their significance
in the subject area;
as well as influencing factors;
analysed the discrepancy
detailed explanation on the
between theoretical and
discrepancy between theoretical
experimental results (if
and experimental results provided
applicable); The analysis is
(if applicable); The analysis is
consistent with the research
consistent with the research
objectives set.
objectives set.
Proposed solution achieves
Proposed solution achieves all
every project objective or
provides an optimal solution
best solution to the problem
to the problem
All results presented in a
Results are extremely well
clearly organized manner
organized, presented and
with a detailed explanation
explained in depth, including
of results and very good
discussion of the complexities
discussion how each
involved and how each project
project objective is
objective is achieved
achieved
Results are thoroughly
Very thoroughly supported results
supported and related to
of strongly proven unquestionable
other sources to verify their
reliability, authenticity
reliability and authenticity
 Conclusion & Recommen-dations
Address research
question and
4 4
achievement of aims and
objectives
8 Mentions some of the
Analysis of limitations
4 and recommendations for 7 some unrealistic
future development
Language: grammar and
4 6
style
Report Quality
Conclusion is not touching
on the research question,
aims, or objectives
No mention of the
potentials, limitations and
recommendations for future
development
Numerous grammatical or
spelling errors are present
which cause most part(s) of
Brief conclusion that misses
out either the research
question or the stated aims
and objectives
potentials and limitations
but leaves out some
obvious ones or unrealistic
recommendations for future
development
Many obvious grammatical
or spelling errors are
present which negatively
Conclusion mentions and
matches most part of the
research question and
stated aims and objectives
Mentions most of the
potentials, limitations and
recommendations for future
development
Some obvious grammatical
or spelling errors are
present which affect
Conclusion mentions and
matches the research
question and stated aims
and objectives
Mentions the potentials,
obvious limitations and
realistic recommendations
for future development
Few grammatical or spelling
errors can be found which
Conclusion summarizes
clearly how the project has
achieved the research
question and stated aims
and objectives
Describes potentials,
limitations and realistic
recommendations for future
development in detail
A very few grammatical or
spelling errors can be
No grammatical or spelling errors
Conclusion emphasizes the
achievements of the research
question and stated aims and
objectives in a concise but
thorough manner
Describes potentials, provides in-
depth analysis of limitations
including proposals for solutions
and future development
recommendations which are
realistic and supported by evidence

does not significantly affect found which does not affect

the report to be effect understandability of understandability of the
the report's quality the report's quality
incomprehensible the report report
8
All citations and
Some of the citations and Most of the citations and
No citation or uses material bibliography are shown All citations and bibliography are
Citation of various Numerous citation and/or bibliography are correct, bibliography are correct,
4 5 from other sources without according to the guidelines shown exactly according to the
sources bibliography errors with a couple of major with a couple of minor
citation with very minor guidelines, with no errors
errors errors
inaccuracies
100 100
** Methodology of the project - If project's research field/area requires the use of certain standards, this criteria should also be used to indicate the appropriate use of such standards

Oral Presentation Part 2

Maximum Unacceptable Poor Marginal Average Good Excellent
Criteria CO
Marks (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

A clearly structured
An outstanding presentation of
Structure and Poorly structured Well structured presentation presentation which
No indication of any A disjointed presentation smooth unquestionable structure
12 attractiveness of 6 presentation with erratic which provides good enhances understanding of
structure which is out of logical order and engaging content that captures
presentation topical shifts and jumps understanding of the project the project and engages an
audience
audience
Presentation Skill & Style

Presenter does not make

eye contact, mumbles or
Preparedness and presentation or is
36 12 6 clearly heard, some minor
confidence interrupted in some major
way due to lack of
preparation
Poor eye contact with
Presenter does not make Eye contact with audience, Presenter speaks with Very confident presenter who
audience, voice not very
eye contact, is hard to hear, clear-voiced presentation, confidence in clear loud speaks and holds himself/herself
or constantly interrupts the no interruption to voice and captures as a professional, completely
interruptions to the
presentation himself/herself presentation audience's attention capturing audience's attention
presentation

Use of presentation tools
12
and visual aids
Technical Content / Demonstration
Very minimal use of
presentation tools and/or
No presentation tools
6 aids, distracts audience or
and/or visual aids used
confuses undertanding of
the presentation
Presentation tools and/or
aids add no value to
understanding of the
presentation
Creative presentation tools
and/or aids are used that
Presentation tools and/or
highlight the quality and
aids are used appropriately
audience's interest to the
presentation
Novel, unusual, very creative
presentation tools used which
captures audience's attention and
enhances understanding of the
presentation

Solution falls short of Optimal solution to a

Solution fails to solve the
solving the specified An adequate solution to a problem is identified, The best solution to a problem is
specified problem and does
16 Problem solution(s)*** 3 No solution presented problem and does not problem is proposed and verified and applied to identified, formulated and
not achieve any of the
achieve a majority of applied resolve the problem implemented successfully
objectives
objectives successfully
32
 Technical Content / Demonstrati
32
Demonstrated solution fails Demonstrated solution falls Demonstrated solution
Demonstrated solution Demonstrated solution provides the
to solve the specified short of solving the provides an optimal solution
Demonstration of Problem solution not solves the specified best solution to the specified
16 3 problem and does not specified problem and does to the specified problem
problem solution(s)*** demonstrated problem and achieves a problem and similar problems while
achieve any of the not achieve a majority of and similar problems;
majority of objectives achieving all project objectives
objectives objectives achieves all objectives

Detailed straight to the point

Quality of provided Unable to answer Out-of-topic or evasive Partly appropriate answers Thorough, well elaborated and very
16 6 Concise answers provided and yet succinct answers
answers question(s) answers to questions to questions convincing answer provided
provided
Q&A

32
Visibly downcast, upset, or Attentive and adequately Calm, clear and confident Impressive composure as of a
Loses composure during Attentive when taking and
16 Attitude and composure 6 distracted during the Q&A responsive when taking and when taking and answering professional speaker when taking
the Q&A session answering questions
session answering questions questions and answering questions

100 100

*** Technical Content/Demonstration - For projects with no demonstration, total weight of 32 applies solely to the first and only assessment (based on presentation)

General Effort Part 1

Maximum Unacceptable Poor Marginal Average Good Excellent
Criteria CO
Marks (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Correctly identifies the problem and

Mis-identifies the problem Correctly identifies the Correctly identifies the Correctly identifies the
Problem identification and No attempt made to identify is able to analyze the problem in-
24 2 or lacks analysis on a problem with some basic problem with adequate problem with insightful
analysis or analyze the problem depth, including the identification of
correctly identified problem analysis analysis analysis
sub-problems

Very brief plan or schedule A plan or schedule is A thorough plan or schedule is

Selection and implementation of A brief plan or schedule is A plan or schedule is
No planning or scheduling without explicit milestones selected which includes selected which includes well-
28 research methodology and 8 selected, including selected, including explicit
is evident and goals, or selected plan well-chosen and significant chosen and significant milestones
management milestones and goals milestones and goals
or schedule is not realistic milestones and goals and goals

Always punctual, meets all

Habitually late or absent, Mostly punctual, meets Always punctual, meets all
Compliance with FYP Frequent cases of absence Scattered cases of absence deadlines, and
often misses deadlines, or most deadlines, and is deadlines, and takes own initiatives
16 policies/guidelines and ethical 5 or lateness, or overly reliant or lateness, or reliant on demonstrates considerable
totally lacks independence reasonably independent of outside of supervisor's
norms on supervisor's guidance supervisor's guidance independence of
in carrying out project supervisor's instructions recommendations
supervisor's instructions

Log book is used

Log book is used to keep Takes initiative to inform supervisor
Non-existing log book, Sparsely filled in log book, appropriately to keep Log book is well compiled,
supervisor fairly updated on of progress while actively seeking
never reports to supervisor rarely reports to supervisor supervisor fairly updated on student regularly updates
16 Discipline and regular reporting 7 progress, but student is not supervisor's input where necessary,
or does not heed or not very receptive to progress, and student is supervisor and seeks the
receptive to supervisor's above and beyond the normal log
supervisor's advice advice receptive to supervisor's appropriate advice
advice book requirements
advice
Limited interest in personal sufficient interest in Willing to develop
Eager to develop personally
development, participated personal development, personally and participated Very eager to develop personally
and often participated in
Personal development/life long No attempt(s) to develop in at least one activity for participated in a few in some activities for this and often participated in activities
16 7 activities for this purpose or
learning activities personally this purpose, or honed an activities for this purpose or purpose or improved an or self-learning of skills for this
picked up new skills for this
existing skill set for this improved an existing skill existing skill set for this project
project
project set for this project project
100

General Effort Part 2

 Maximum Unacceptable Poor Marginal Average Good Excellent
Criteria CO
Marks (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Thorough investigation resulted in

Fell short of solving a Satisfactory/acceptable
Proposed solution did not Well justified problem an original, creative and well
Proposal of solution to a No attempt(s) made to complex research problem; problem solution; achieved
28 3 achieve any of the defined solution; achieved all justified problem solution which
complex problem propose a problem solution did not achieve majority of majority of defined project
project objectives project ojectives achieved more than the defined
project objectives objectives
project objectives

Very brief plan or schedule A plan or schedule is A thorough plan or schedule is

Selection and implementation of A brief plan or schedule is A plan or schedule is
No planning or scheduling without explicit milestones selected which includes selected which includes well-
16 research methodology and 8 selected, including selected, including explicit
is evident and goals, or selected plan well-chosen and significant chosen and significant milestones
management milestones and goals milestones and goals
or schedule is not realistic milestones and goals and goals

Correctly identifies the problem and

Mis-identifies the problem Correctly identifies the Correctly identifies the Correctly identifies the
Problem identification and No attempt made to identify is able to analyze the problem in-
20 2 or lacks analysis on a problem with some basic problem with adequate problem with insightful
analysis or analyze the problem depth, including the identification of
correctly identified problem analysis analysis analysis
sub-problems

Always punctual, meets all

Habitually late or absent, Mostly punctual, meets Always punctual, meets all
Compliance with FYP Frequent cases of absence Scattered cases of absence deadlines, and
often misses deadlines, or most deadlines, and is deadlines, and takes own initiatives
12 policies/guidelines and ethical 5 or lateness, or overly reliant or lateness, or reliant on demonstrates considerable
totally lacks independence reasonably independent of outside of supervisor's
norms on supervisor's guidance supervisor's guidance independence of
in carrying out project supervisor's instructions recommendations
supervisor's instructions
Log book is used
Log book is used to keep Takes initiative to inform supervisor
Non-existing log book, Sparsely filled in log book, appropriately to keep Log book is well compiled,
supervisor fairly updated on of progress while actively seeking
never reports to supervisor rarely reports to supervisor supervisor fairly updated on student regularly updates
12 Discipline and regular reporting 7 progress, but student is not supervisor's input where necessary,
or does not heed or not very receptive to progress, and student is supervisor and seeks the
receptive to supervisor's above and beyond the normal log
supervisor's advice advice receptive to supervisor's appropriate advice
advice book requirements
advice
Limited interest in personal sufficient interest in Willing to develop
Eager to develop personally
development, participated personal development, personally and participated Very eager to develop personally
and often participated in
Personal development/life long No attempt(s) to develop in at least one activity for participated in a few in some activities for this and often participated in activities
12 7 activities for this purpose or
learning activities personally this purpose, or honed an activities for this purpose or purpose or improved an or self-learning of skills for this
picked up new skills for this
existing skill set for this improved an existing skill existing skill set for this project
project
project set for this project project
100

Poster Submission
Maximum Unacceptable Poor Marginal Average Good Excellent
Criteria CO
Marks ( 0, Special Penalty ) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Did not submit a poster, or

100 FYP Poster 7 submitted a blank poster Submitted a poster, with the specific grade allocated depending on the evaluation in the 'Poster' worksheet.
(Failing grade awarded)

100

Overall Ethical Compliance

Unacceptable Poor Marginal Average Good Excellent
Criteria CO
(Special penalty) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Overall similarity index
exceeds 20% or similarity
Similarity index of between Similarity index of between Similarity index of between Similarity index of between Similarity index of between 0% and
Report originality 5 with any individual source
12% and 20% 8% and 12% 5% and 8% 2% and 5% 2%
exceeds 3%
(Failing grade awarded)

Timely submission of final report
Submission of "Summary of FYP Posters"
Late by less than 2 days Late by less than 1 day
Late by 2 days or more (Deduction of 5 marks from (Deduction of 5 marks from
8 On time On time On time
(Failing grade awarded) overall total score for overall total score for
Project) Project)
Summary of 3 posters
Summary of 3 posters Summary of 3 posters Summary of 3 posters Summary of 3 posters
signed and verified by Summary of 3 posters signed and
7 signed and verifyed by signed and verifyed by signed and verifyed by signed and verifyed by
supervisors not submitted verifyed by supervisors submitted
supervisors submitted supervisors submitted supervisors submitted supervisors submitted
(Failing grade awarded)