PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 - Rev.0 Calculation For Bund Wall

PT PERTAMINA EP
WELL, PRODUCTION & PROJECT DEPT.
Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall
0 25 May 2022 Issued for Construction DH AW MRA/OMP

B 17 May 2022 Issued for Approval DH AW MRA/OMP
A 22 Apr 2022 Issued for Review DH AW MRA/OMP
PRE CHK APP CHK APP
REV DATE DESCRIPTION Consortium PT Bina Rekacipta Utama &
PT Tiga Inti Pilar
PERTAMINA EP
TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION AND/OR UTILIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE FORBIDDEN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION OF PT PERTAMINA EP
JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP (BLANKET ORDER)

DED PERBAIKAN TANGKI TIMBUN (14 UNIT)
Contract Number : 4650011247 SPMK No.: 001A/PPC92200/2022-SO
Document No.: Revision

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 0
PT PERTAMINA EP REGION 4 ZONA 14

TABULATION OF REVISION SHEET
REVISION REVISION
SHEET REMARKS SHEET REMARKS
A B 0 1 2 3 A B 0 1 2 3
1 46
2 47
3 48
4 49
5 50
6 51
7 52
8 53
9 54
10 55
11 56
12 57
13 58
14 59
15 60
16 61
17 62
18 63
19 64
20 65
21 66
22 67
23 68
24 69
25 70
26 71
27 72
28 73
29 74
30 75
31 76
32 77
33 78
34 79
35 80
36 ATTACHMENT
37 1
38 2
39 3
40 4
41 5
42 6
43 7
44 8
45 9
PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 – Rev- 0 Page 2 of 19


REVISION SHEET DESCRIPTION
REV DESCRIPTION DATE CONTRACTOR RESPONSE COMPANY REVIEW



Table of Contents
TABULATION OF REVISION SHEET ..................................................................................................................... 2
REVISION SHEET DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................... 3
1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 6
2. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................................. 7
3. DEFINITION ..................................................................................................................................................... 7
4. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................. 7
5. REFERENCE.................................................................................................................................................... 8
5.1. CODE DAN STANDARD ................................................................................................................................. 8
5.2. PROCEDURE AND COMPANY SPECIFICATION ................................................................................................. 9
5.3. REFERENCE PROJECT ................................................................................................................................. 9
6. MATERIAL UNIT WEIGHT ............................................................................................................................... 9
6.1. MATERIAL .................................................................................................................................................. 9
7. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................... 10
7.1. GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................. 10
7.2. SOIL PARAMETER DATA ............................................................................................................................ 10
7.3. PRIMARY LOAD ......................................................................................................................................... 10
7.4. LOAD COMBINATIONS................................................................................................................................ 11
7.5. SHALLOW SOIL BEARING CAPACITY ........................................................................................................... 11
7.6. OVERTURNING AND SLIDING MOMENT STABILITY ........................................................................................ 12
7.7. FOUNDATION REBAR ................................................................................................................................. 13
8. RESULT AND SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 14
8.1. SLIDING AND OVERTURNING CAPACITY CHECKS ......................................................................................... 14
8.2. BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT CHECKS .......................................................................................... 14
8.3. STEEL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN RESULTS ................................................................................................. 14



List of Table
TABLE 5.1 CODE AND STANDARD .................................................................................................................. 8
TABLE 6.1 MATERIAL UNIT WEIGHT .............................................................................................................. 9
TABLE 7.1 LOAD COMBINATIONS USED FOR FOUNDATION STABILITY CHECK ................................................ 11
TABLE 7.2 LOAD COMBINATION FOR CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT DESIGN .................................................. 11
TABLE 8.1 SLIDING AND OVERTURNING FOS............................................................................................... 14
TABLE 8.2 BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT ........................................................................................ 14
TABLE 8.3. FOUNDATION DESIGN ................................................................................................................ 14



1. INTRODUCTION

In regards with fax of President Director of PT. Pertamina (Persero), No.147/C00000/2021-SO, dated 07
April 2021, regarding the requirement to increase safety awareness, operation excellence, application of
standards and best practice, in Pertamina’s storage tanks infrastructure following the fire incident in
Storage Tank RU VI Balongan.
Also, following the Letter of Directorate of Development & Production sub holding Upstream No.
004/PHE2000/2021-SO, dated 2 July 2021, regarding the Implementation Team to Increase Awareness
of Safety and Operational Aspects in the storage tanks infrastructure in Pertamina's Upstream Sector.
Both letters became the basis for Pertamina sub holding upstream (SHU) team to conduct self-
assessment on some of the storage tanks infrastructure in the upstream sector.
The results of self-assessment show that there is a need for improvement of safety aspects in the
infrastructure. The determination of the priority scale of implementation of improving safety and operational
aspects in the storage tanks infrastructure in the Upstream – Pertamina sector has been carried out on 7
important elements, namely lightning protection system installation, overflow prevention, CCTV online
surveillance installation, availability of alarms or hazard sirens, early detection and firefighting systems,
external audits and improvement of operator competence.
PT. Pertamina EP Region 4 Zona 14 has conducted voluntary inspection and survey for area of SP
Klamumuk, SP-1 Klamono, SP-2 Klamono, SP-3 Klamono, SP-4 Klamono, SPU Klamono, SP Linda, SP
Sele, Salawati, SPU Salawati, Terminal Sorong & Walio Pump Station. Based on the results of voluntary
inspection and survey there are 40 tanks that need to be further improved.
Figure 1.1 Work Locations of PT Pertamina EP Region 4 Zona 14, Papua Field
In the first priority of handling and improving safety aspects in the storage tanks infra-structure in PT
Pertamina EP Field Papua area focused on 4 aspects:
 Lightning Protection System & Grounding System;
 Installation CCTV;
 Alarm System & Public Announcer (Siren Hazard);
 Overfill Protection;
The main result of the deliverable FEED Study Enhanced Tank Safety Protection (40 Units) is that the
design of tank protection against fire and overflow events will be able to be monitored by CCTV in real
monitoring and besides that, handling fire and overflow events is no longer manually, but has been
integrated into a system prevention and emergency response.

2. SCOPE

The purpose of this document is to provide engineering design calculation related to the structure and
foundation of Bundwalls for SLW T101 Tank within Produced Water Tank Salawati Project located in
PT Pertamina EP Zone 14.
3. DEFINITION
Company : PT. PERTAMINA EP, Regional 4 Zona 14
Contractor : Consortium PT Bina Rekacipta Utama – PT Tiga Inti Pilar
JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP (BLANKET ORDER)

Project :
DED Perbaikan Tangki Timbun (14 Unit)
4. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
A Area
c Soil Cohesion
CS Seismic Respond Coefficient
eX, eY, eZ Eccentricity
fC’ Concrete Yield Strength
fy Steel Yield Strength
FRS Foundation shear resistance
FSX, FSZ Foundation shear force
FX, FY, FZ Force
G Gust Effect in Wind
LC Load Combination
MRX, MRZ Foundation sliding moment resistance
MX, MY, MZ Moment
qal Allowable bearing capacity
 Unit weight
μ Friction Coefficients
σ Stress
ϕ Friction Angle


DL Dead Load
LQ Liquid Load
S Surcharge Load
PE Earth Pressure Load
5. REFERENCE
5.1. Code dan Standard
Table 5.1 Code and Standard
No. Document Number Document Title

Building Code Requirements for Structural
1 ACI 318-19
Concrete and Commentary
2 AISC 360-16 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
Minimum Design Loads for Building and
3 ASCE 7-10
Other Structures
American Welding Standard, Structural
4 AWS D1.1-15
Welding Code Steel
5 IBC 2015 International Building Code
Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan
6 SNI 1726-2019 Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung
dan Non-Gedung
Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria
7 SNI 1727-2020 Terkait untuk Bangunan Gedung dan
Struktur Lain
Spesifikasi untuk Bangunan Gedung Baja
8 SNI 1729-2015
Struktural
9 SNI 2049-2015 Semen Portland
10 SNI 2052-2017 Baja Tulangan Beton
Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk
11. SNI 2847-2019
Bangunan Gedung dan Penjelasan


5.2. Procedure and Company Specification
Design basis and other specifications used in this document are in line with PT Pertamina EP Asset 5
Project documents.
1. PEP-00-A0-SP-0001 Civil and Structural Design Basis
1. PEP-00-A3-SP-0001 Specification for Foundation
1. PEP-00-A5-SP-0001 Specification for Steel Structure
5.3. Reference Project

1. PEP-SPT-PM-DBS-001 Project design basis
Concrete Bund Wall, Plan, Section and Detail
2. PEP-PWT-SAL-CV-DWG-202
SPU Salawati
6. MATERIAL UNIT WEIGHT
6.1. Material
Material used for this project calculation as follows in table below:
Table 6.1 Material Unit Weight
No. Material Symbol Unit Weight Unit

1 Concrete bp 21.58 kN/m3
2 Reinforced concrete bt 23.54 kN/m3
3 Water w 9.81 kN/m3
4 Soil Soil 17.33 kN/m3


7. METHODOLOGY
7.1. General
This chapter describes bund wall structural and foundation design. Detailed calculation is presented in
Attachment A.
The aspects analyzed in this document are as follows:

 Volumetric capacity check
 Soil bearing capacity
 Foundation stability due to overturning moment and sliding force.
 Steel reinforcement requirement check
 Elastic settlement check
7.2. Soil Parameter Data
Soil data used in this document are derived from CPT Tests performed by UPTD Laboratory Sorong in
2017.
7.3. Primary Load
7.3.1. Dead Load (DL)

Dead load considered in the calculation consists of concrete foundation weight (23.54 kN/m3), and soil
weight (17.0 kN/m3).
7.3.2. Live Load (LL)

There is no Live Load accounted for in this calculation.
7.3.3. Piping and Thermal Load (PE, PO, PT)

There is no piping load accounted for in this calculation.
7.3.4. Wind Load (WX, WZ) and Earthquake Load (EX, EZ)
Wind and earthquake loads are not included in this calculation.
7.3.5. Liquid Load

Liquid load considered in this calculation is the horizontal water pressure to the bund wall.
7.3.6. Surcharge Load

Surcharge load considered in this calculation is taken as 180 kg/m2.
7.3.7. Soil Pressure Load

Soil pressure load is estimated from Rankine Theory using soil density and friction angle as input.


7.4. Load Combinations
Load Combinations used in this calculation are listed in Table-3 and Table 4
Table 7.1 Load Combinations used for Foundation Stability Check
LC Description
100 DL
101 DL+LQ+S+PE
Table 7.2 Load Combination for Concrete Reinforcement Design
LC Description
200 1.4 DL
201 1.2DL + 1.6LQ+1.6S+1.6PE
7.5. Shallow Soil Bearing Capacity

Soil Bearing Capacity is calculated using Schmertmann equation as follows:
q ult = 2 +(0.28 qc)
qul = ultimate soil bearing capacity,
qc = cone penetration
SF = Safety Factor (3)
The vertical stresses imposed on the soil are calculated by considering the base structure of the foundation
as a very rigid monolithic structure. Eccentricity and earth pressure are calculated according to Teng's
method as follows.
Eccentricity imposed to foundation base structure is determined with the following formula:
eX = MZ / -FY
eZ = MX / -FY
If eX/LF < 1/6 or eZ/LF < 1/6, then soil pressure in the base of foundation is
qmax X = FY/AF + MX/SX ≤ qal
qmin X = FY/AF - MX/SX ≥ 0
qmax Z = FY/AF + MZ/SZ ≤ qal
qmin Z = FY/AF - MZ/SZ ≥ 0
On the other hand, if eX/LF ≥ 1/6 or eZ/LF ≥ 1/6, then soil pressure in the base of foundation is
qmax X = 2FY / [3BF (LF / 2 - |eX|)] ≤ qal
qmin = 0


with,
eX = eccentricity at the base of foundation in X direction,
eZ = eccentricity at the base of foundation in Z direction,
MX = moment at the base of foundation in X direction,
MZ = moment at the base of foundation in X direction,
FY = Vertical load imposed at the base of foundation in Y direction,
qmax = Maximum vertical soil pressure due to eccentricity,
qmin = Maximum vertical soil pressure due to eccentricity,
LF = Foundation length,
BF = Foundation width.
7.6. Overturning and Sliding Moment Stability

Safety factors for shallow foundation are calculated with equations below:
SF = MR / MOX = (FY BF / 2) / MOX or
SF = MR / MOZ = (FY LF / 2) / MOZ
As for safety factor in shallow foundation to sliding force calculated with equation below:
SF = FRS / FSX or
SF = FRS / FSZ
FRS = μ FY
With
SF = Safety Factor,
FRS = Foundation sliding resistance,
FSX = Foundation sliding force in X Direction,
FSX = Foundation sliding force in Z Direction,
FY = Vertical load in Y direction at the bottom of foundation,
μ = Friction coefficient,
MOX = Overturning Moment in X Direction,
MOZ = Overturning Moment in Z Direction


7.7. Foundation Rebar

The reinforced concrete foundation steel is designed according to ACI 318-19 by considering the stresses
that occur at the base of the foundation and the shear forces that occur between the pedestal and the
foundation tread.


8. RESULT AND SUMMARY
8.1. Sliding and Overturning Capacity Checks
The following Table shows the results of sliding and overturning capacity check with a minimum F.O.S of
1.5 for sliding and 2 for overturning.
Table 8.1 Sliding and Overturning FOS
Design Resisting
Parameter Condition FOS Min. FOS Remarks
Results Forces
Overturning Permanent 1.49 kNm 28.29 kNm 18.98 2.0 Ok
Moment Temporary 17.66 kNm 40.55 kNm 2.30 2.0 Ok
Sliding Temporary 12.92 kN 40.8 kN 3.16 1.5 Ok
8.2. Bearing Capacity and Settlement Checks

The following Table shows the results of bearing capacity and elastic settlement checks.
Table 8.2 Bearing Capacity and Settlement
Design
Parameter Condition Limit Remarks
Results
Maximum base Temporary 41.96 kN/m2 147.87 kN/m2 Ok
pressure
Minimum base Temporary 13.47 kN/m2 - Ok
pressure
Ground Elastic 24.34mm 25.40mm Ok
Settlement
8.3. Steel Reinforcement Design Results

The Table presented below shows the design results of steel reinforcement calculation of the bund wall.
Table 8.3. Foundation Design
Structural Description
Unit Design
Element
Bund wall Footing Length per m mm 1000
Width mm 1600
Thickness mm 250
Reinforcement - D13-200
2 layers both ways
Wall Length per m mm 1000
Thickness mm 250
Height mm 2100
Reinforcement - D13-200
2 layers both ways


Attachment – A
Bund Wall Calculation

SLW T101 BUNDWALL STRUCTURAL AND FOUNDATION - CALCULATION
SLW T101 Tank Bundwall

1. GENERAL
1.1. Allowable Bearing Capacity of Soil
The soil bearing capacity is to be estimated from CPT Test performed in 2017 by UPTD Lab. Sorong.
No Term of Capacity kN/m2 Condition Formula

1. Allowable soil Bearing Capacity 111.00 Permanent Schmertmann
2. Allowable soil Bearing Capacity 147.63 Temporary Schmertmann
The soil bearing capacity may be increased 1,33 from allowable capacity on temporary condition.
1.2. Material Properties

No Name Symbol Value Unit Remarks
1. Concrete design Strength f'c 19.04 MPa
2. Steel design Strength fy 400 MPa
3. Reinforcement Steel Bar fy 392 MPa
4. Unit Weight of Concrete c 24 kN/m3
5. Unit Weight of Lean Concrete lc 23 kN/m3
6. Unit Weight of Sand Bedding sb 19 kN/m3
7. Unit Weight of soil s 17.335 kN/m3
8. Coefficient Friction of soil  0.5
9. Density of Water w 9.81 kN/m3
1.3. Units
Units in the calculation is Metric System.
2. DESIGN CRITERIA
- Factored loading combination is used for reinforced concrete design.
- Unfactored loading combination is used for soil stability
No. Description Remarks
1 Analysis Static
2 Concrete Design ACI 318-05 / 318R-05
3. LOAD COMBINATION
3.1 Loading
LC Description Remarks
1 Dead Load = DL
2 Liquid Load = LQ
3 Surcharge Load = S
4 Earth Pressure = PE
1 of 16
3.2 Unfactored Load Combination
The following unfactored loading combination is used for steel design, deflection and support reactions for foundation design
by Allowable Stress Design.

100 DL Operating Condition
101 DL + LQ+S+PE Operating Condition
3.3 Factored Load Combination

The following factored load combination is used for reinforced concrete design by Load and Resistance Factored Design
method.
200 1.4DL Operating Condition
201 1.2DL + 1.6LQ+1.6S+1.6PE Operating Condition
2 of 16
4. DESIGN OF BUND WALL
4.1. Height Design of Bund Wall

15.0 m
SLW T101
m
6.096 m 7.50 m
12.0
Plan view of bund wall (unit in meter)
3 of 16
Total Area of Bund Wall, Area of Foundations, Bund Wall Volume & Volume of Tank
Total area of bund wall (AT) = 15 * 12

2
= 180.00 m
Design height of bund wall (HT) below freeboard = 1.250 m
Total Volume of bund wall (VT) = 225.00 3
m
Height of foundation above gravel (h1) = 0.40 m
Height of tank due to bund wall height (h2) = 0.85 m
Reducing area of bund wall are follow :

- Area of concrete foundation = 0.25*7.5^2*π
= 44.18 m2
- Area of T101 Tank = 0.25*6.096^2*π
= 29.19 m2
Design volume tank due to the design bund wall height is :

- Volume of SLW T 101 = 176.48 m3 Based on PEP-SP-SAL-ME-DWG-201
Reducing volume of bund wall consist of :

- Volume of concrete foundation above ground (V1')
= (44.18 * 0.40)
= 17.67 m3
- Volume of T101 tank due to height of bund wall (V1")
= (29.19 * 0.85)
= 24.81 m3
- Volume effective of bund wall = (VT - (V1'+V1")

= 225.000 - 42.480
= 182.52 m3 > 176.48 OK
Required height of bund wall below freeboard = 1.25 m
4 of 16
Use height of bund wall incl. freeboard = 1.40 m
Take height of bundwall = 1.40 m (above gravel)
"The volumetric capacity of the diked area shall not be less than the greatest amount of liquid that can be released from
the largest tank within the diked area, assuming a full tank."

(as per NFPA 30 - FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID CODE)
250 mm
1400 mm
Gravel 100 mm THK
F.G.L. EL. 100,100
EL. +100,000 100 mm
600 mm
250 mm
B = 1600 mm
Section B - B
4.2. Check Stability

h = 2350 mm
t = 250 mm
Unit weight water

ct = 1000 kg/m3
Unit weight of concrete
c = 2400 kg/m3
Soil properties are derived from CPT Test Report performed by UPTD Lab. Sorong:
s = 1767.7 kg/m3
c = 2500 kg/m2
ø = 35 o
Ka = tan2 ( 45 - ø/2 )
= 0.271 = 0.271
Kp = tan2 ( 45 + ø/2 )
= 3.690 = 3.690
gravel = 1800 kg/m3
5 of 16
250 mm
150 mm

Inside Outside
h1b = 1250 mm
ht = 2350 mm
q = 180 kg/m
2 P1
h1a = 100 mm
P2 h2 = 600 mm
P4
P3 P5
A h3 = 250 mm
1600 mm
Horizontal force per 1 m length Arm (m) Moment (kg.m)

P1 = 1/2 * ct * h1b2
= 0.5 x 1,000.00 x 1.25^2 = 781.25 kg 1.37 1067.71
P2 = ct * h1b * Ka * (h1a + h2 + h3)
= 1,000.00 x 1.250 x 0.27 x (0.10 + 0.60 + 0.25) = 321.80 kg 0.48 152.86
P3 = 1/2 * Ka * s *(h2 + h3)2
= 0.50 x 0.27 x 1,767.68 x (0.60 + 0.25)^2 173.05 kg 0.28 49.03
P4 = q * Ka * (h2 + h3)
= 180.00 x 0.27 x (0.60 + 0.25) = 41.46 kg 0.43 17.62
P5 = 1/2 * Kp * s * (h2 + h3)2
= 0.50 x 3.69 x 1,767.68 x (0.60 + 0.25)^2 = -2356.45 kg 0.28 -667.66
Total horizontal force, H = -1038.89 kg 619.55
## ##
Where :
P1 : Horizontal force due to hydrostatic pressure calculated use density of condensate
P2 : Horizontal force due to hydrostatic pressure below concretre slab calculated use density of condensate
P3 : Horizontal force due to soil active pressure calculated use density of soil backfill
P4 : Horizontal force due to weight of concrete slab and soil active pressure
P5 : Horizontal force due to soil pasive pressure calculated use density of soil backfill
6 of 16
250 mm
fb = 150 mm
W1
W2
h1b = 1250 mm
W6 ht = 2350 mm
h1a = 100 mm
W4 W5
h2 = 600 mm
h3 = 250 mm
W3
A
xn
1600 mm
Vertical force per 1 m length Arm (m) Momen (kg.m)

W 1 = (1.6 - 0.25)/2 * 1000 * 1.25 = 843.75 kg -1.2625 -1065.23
W 2 = (0.25 * 2.1) * 2400 = 1284.84 kg -0.80 -1027.87
W 3 = (0.25 * 1.6) * 2400 = 960.00 kg -0.80 -768.00
W 4 = (1.6 - 0.25)/2 * 1767.677686 * 0.6 = 715.91 kg -1.2625 -903.84
W 5 = (1.6 - 0.25)/2 * 1767.677686 * 0.6 = 715.91 kg -0.3375 -241.62
W 6 = (1.6 - 0.25)/2 * 1800 * 0.1 = 121.50 kg -1.2625 -153.39
Q, total vertical force = 4520.41 kg Moment = -4159.96
Total moment at point A, Mt = 619.55 + (-4,159.96)

= -3540.4 kg.m
Position of xn from point A, as resultant of total vertical forces

M -3540.4
e = e =
Q 4520.4
= -0.783 m
(negative value xn is in negative direction)
a. Stability againts Sliding

Horizontal force is resisted by friction force under foundation.
Total horizontal force = 1317.56 kg
Total vertical force = 4520.41 kg
Friction coefficient,  = 0.4
Sliding resistance, fr + Passive = 4520.41 * 0.4 + 2356.45 = 4164.61 kg
Safety factor fr + Passive
=
H
4165
= = 3.16 = > 1.5 OK
1317.56
7 of 16
b. Check against Overturning
x is B/3 = 0.53 m distance be within the middle 1/3 B
y0 is 1/3 (h2+h3) = 0.283 m distance above base to Pah0 for empty condition
y1 is (h1a+1/3h1b+h2+h3) = 1.367 m distance above base to Pah1 for operating condition
Computation the total vertical force R is :

Total vertical force, R = Wc + Ws + P'av (Bowles, J.E Eq. 12-4)
where ;
Wc : Total weight of concrete
Ws : Total weight of soil
P'av : Vertical resistance on virtual back that developes the wall tends to turn over
Weight of concrere, Wc = W2 + W3
= 1,284.84 + 960.00
= 2244.84 kg
Weight of gravel, Wgr = W6

= 121.50
= 121.50 kg
Weight of soil, Ws = W4 + W5
= 715.91 + 715.91
= 1431.82 kg
Horizontal force, Pah0 = P2 + P3 + P4 (Empty Condition)

= 321.80 + 173.05 + 41.46
= 536.31 kg
Soil perpendicular wall,  = 90  sin  = 1
Vertical resistance, Pav0 = Pah0 . sin 90
= 536.31 * 1
= 536.31 kg
Horizontal force, Pah1 = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4 (Operating Condition)

= 781.25 + 321.80 + 173.05 + 41.46
= 1317.56 kg
Soil perpendicular wall,  = 90  sin  = 1
Vertical resistance, Pav1 = Pah1.sin 90
= 1,317.56 * 1
= 1317.56 kg
 Wi.x + Pav.B
Safety Factor Overturning = (Bowles, J.E Eq. 12-5)
Pah.y
 Wi.x + Pav0.B
S.F Empty Condition =
Pah0.y0
((2,244.84 + 121.50 + 1,431.82) * 0.53) + (536.31 * 1.60)
=
536.31 * 0.28
= 18.98 > 2 OK
 Wi.x + Pav1.B
S.F Operating Condition =
Pah1.y1
(2,244.84 + 121.50 + 1,431.82) * 0.53 + (1,317.56 * 1.60)
=
1,317.56 * 1.37
= 2.30 > 2 OK
8 of 16
c. Check Bearing Capacity of Soil
2
qa = 147.63 kN/m
2
= 14763.00 kg/m
The actual bearing pressure is calculated as follow :

qmax = Q /A + M/ Z (Unfactored)
qmin = Q /A - M/ Z (Unfactored)
3
Z = 0.43 m
qmax = 4520.41 / 1.6 + 619.55 / 0.43
2
= 4277.339 kg/m
2
= 41.96 kN/m
qmin = 4520.41 / 1.6 - 619.55 / 0.43
= 1373.175 kg/m2
2
13.471 kN/m
Eccentricity, e = B / 2 - xn = 0.02 m < 1/6 B = 0.27 m
qmax = 2
41.96 kN/m
qmin = 13.471 kN/m2
2 2
= 41.96 kN/m < 147.63 kN/m OK
S.F = 3.52
9 of 16
C B
13.471
25.82
29.62 41.96
2
Soil pressure under foundation (kN/m )
4.3. Design of Reinforcement

Material quality
2
fy = 4000 kg/cm = 392 Mpa
fc' = 190.4 kg/cm2 = 19.04 Mpa
4.3.1 Footing Reinforcement

a. Moment at section B
Weight of soil & concrete = ((1767.677686 * 0.6) + (2,447.32 * 0.25)) * (1.6 - 0.25)/2
= 1128.894 kg
-1,128.89 x 0.68 29.62 x 0.68^2 + 2 x (41.96 - 29.62) x 0.68^2

M = +
2 2 6
= -358.9 kg.m = -3519.5658 N.m
= -0.4 ton.m
= -3519565.8 N.mm
Mu = -4927392.2 N.mm (factored load 1.4)
10 of 16
Refer to ACI 318-05, sub-chapter 7.12 ; area shringkage and temperature reinforcement are follows :
min = 0.0018
used = 0.0018
where ;
d' = 70 mm
d 173.5 mm
=
b = 1600 mm
l = 1000 mm (taken 1 m length)
Re-bar Selection
Rebar perpendicular to wall
As req. = used * b * d
= 0.0018 x 1600 x 173.5
2
= 499.7 mm
D = 13 mm ; Ab = 132.7 mm2
s max. = 3 x t ≤450 mm = 450 mm (as per 7.6.5 in ACI 318M-05)
No. of Re-bar per meter, n = As req. / Ab = 499.7 / 132.7

nx = 5
Spacing of Re-bar,
sx = 320 mm
= 200 mm use D 13 @ 200 mm
As used. = 0.25  x (13)^2 x 5
663.66 mm2 > As required OK
Rebar longitudinal
ρ min = 0.0018
used = 0.0018
As req. = 0.0018 * l * d
= 312.3 mm2
D = 13 mm ; Ab = 132.7 mm2
ny = 4
Spacing of Re-bar,
sy = 250 mm
= 200 mm use D 13 @ 200 mm
As used. = 0.25  x (13)^2 x 4
b. Moment at section C
Weight of soil, water, and concrete
= (1,767.68 * 0.60 + 2,400 * 0.25 + 1,000.00 * 1.25) * 0.65
= 1891.89 kgm
-1,891.89 x 0.68 13.47 x 0.68^2 2 x (26 - 13.47) x 0.68^2

M = + +
2 2 3
= -610.3 kg.m = -5984.8147 N.m (negative moment direction)
= -0.6 ton.m
Mu = -5984814.701 N.mm
Mu = -8378740.6 N.mm (factor load 1.4)
for further calculation negative moment direction may be use absolute function to change to positive value
11 of 16
min = 0.0018
used = 0.0018
where ;
d' = 70 mm
d 173.5 mm
=
b = 1600 mm
l = 1000 mm (taken 1 m length)
Re-bar Selection
Rebar perpendicular to wall
As req. = 0.0018 * b * d +
2
= 499.7 mm
2
D = 13 mm ; Ab = 132.7 mm
ny = 5
Spacing of Re-bar,
sy = 320 mm
= 200 mm use D 13 @ 200 mm
As used. = 0.25  x (13)^2 x 5
ρ min = 0.0018
used = 0.0018
As req. = 0.0018 * l * d
= 312.3 mm2
2
D = 13 mm ; Ab = 132.7 mm
s max. = 3 x t ≤450 mm = 450 mm
ny = 4
Spacing of Re-bar,
sy = 250 mm
= 200 mm use D 13 @ 200 mm
As used. = 0.25  x (13)^2 x 4
Check Cross Section due to moment capacity

Reduction factor Ø = 0.9
1 = 0.8500
c = 0.0033
Concrete compressive strength fc' = 2761 psi
Width of foundation width = 39.3701 in
As = 1.4394 in2
As' = 1.4394 in2
fy = 56855 psi
d' = 2.7559 in
d = 7.0866 in
a = 0.7087 (inch)
Cc = 55663.14 (lb)
s' = N/A
s = 0.0020
fs = 56854.78 (psi)
fs' = N/A (psi)
Csy' = N/A (lb)
Csy = 81837.79 (lb)
Ʃ H=0 = -26174.652
Mu = 339928.67 (lb-inch)
3.92 (Mton-meter)
Mn = 377698.52 (lb-inch)
Moment Capacity 4.35 (Mton-meter) OK
12 of 16
4.3.2 Wall reinforcement
Momen due to water pressure :
M1 = 1/2 * h12 * γ * (1/3 h1 + h2) + γ * h1 * Ka * 1/2 * h22
= 855243.6 kg.mm = 8387074.6 N.mm
Momen due to active soil pressure
M2 = 1/2 * h2 * γs * Ka * 1/3 h22 - 2c * Ka^0.5
* 1/2 * h22
= 16776.3 kg.mm = 164519.5 N.mm
Mmax = M1 + M2 = 8551594.1N.mm
= 872.02 kg.m = 0.9 ton.m
Mu = 1.6* Mmax = 13682550.6N.mm
Fh = 1/2 * h^2 * γ = 2761.25 kg = 27078.61 N
min = 0.0018
used = 0.0018
where ;
d' = 70 mm
d = 173.5 mm
b = 1000 mm (taken 1 m widthh)
Re-bar Selection
Rebar Vertical
As req. = 0.0018 * b * d +
2
= 312.3 mm
D = 13 mm ; Ab = 132.7 mm2
ny = 4
Spacing of Re-bar,
sy = 250 mm
= 200 mm use D 13 @ 200 mm
As used. = 0.25  x (13)^2 x 4
Rebar longitudinal
ρ min = 0.0018
used = 0.0018
As req. = 0.0018 * b * d
= 312.3 mm2
D = 13 mm ; Ab = 132.7 mm2
s max. = 3 x t ≤450 mm = 450 mm
ny = 4
Spacing of Re-bar,
sy = 250 mm
= 200 mm use D 13 @ 200 mm
As used. = 0.25  x (13)^2 x 4
13 of 16
Check Cross Section due to moment capacity
Reduction factor Ø = 0.9
1 = 0.8500
c = 0.0033
Concrete compressive strength fc' = 2761 psi
Width of foundation
width = 39.3701 in
As = 0.8225 in2
As' = 0.8225 in2
fy = 56855 psi
d' = 2.7559 in
d = 7.0866 in
a = 0.7087 (inch)
Cc = 55663.14 (lb)
s' = N/A
s = 0.0020
fs = 56854.78 (psi)
fs' = N/A (psi)
Csy' = N/A (lb)
Csy = 46764.45 (lb)
Ʃ H=0 = 8898.688
Mu = 339928.67 (lb-inch)
3.92 (Mton-meter)
Mn = 377698.52 (lb-inch)
Moment Capacity 4.35 (Mton-meter) OK
q
Check Shear Strength of Slab

wy = ty
tx
tx + d
wx
Pu = 13904.28 N (taken from W 2 + worker as concentated load)

wx = 1500 mm
wy = 1000 mm (take 1 m length)
tx = 200 mm
ty = 1000 mm (take 1 m length)
h = 200 mm
d' = 50 mm
d = 143.5 mm
14 of 16
bo = tx + d
= 200 + 143.5
= 343.5 mm
Vpu = (Pu / (wx.wy)).((wx.wy) - (tx + d).(ty))

= (13,904.28 / (1,500 x 1,000)) x ((1,500
x 1,000) - ((200 + 143.5) x (1,000)))
= 10720.20 N
= 10.72 kN
 = Max(tx,ty) / Min(tx,ty) ratio of long to short dimension for two-way slab

= 5.00
s = 40 for interior columns

= 30 for edge column
= 20 for corner column
Vc1 = 0.17 . (1 + 2/)fc'^0.5 . bo . d (ACI 318M-05 11-33)

= (0.17 x (1 + 2 / 5) x 19^0.5 x 343.5 x 143.5)
= 51190.46 N
= 51.19 kN
Vc2 = 0.083 . (s / bo + 2) . fc'^0.5 . bo . d (ACI 318M-05 11-34)
= (0.083 x (20 / 343.5 + 2) x 19^0.5 x 343.5 x 143.5)
= 36743.70 N
= 36.74 kN
Vc3 = 0.33 fc'^0.5 . bo . d (ACI 318M-05 11-35)

= (0.33 x 19^0.5 x 343.5 x 143.5)
= 70978.38 N
= 70.98 kN
Taken Min. Vc1, Vc2, Vc3
= 36.74 kN
.Vc = 19.0 x 36.74

= 699.60 kN > Vpu = 10.72 kN OK
Stirrups Requirements :
Necessity of Stirrups Condition:

i) When Vu < 1/2 øVc , Shear re-bar is not necessary.
ii) When øVc > Vu > 1/2 øVc , Min. shear re-bar is required.
iii) When Vu > ø Vc , Shear re-bar is required
Compute Shear Reinforcement
.Vc = 19.0 x 36.74

= 699.60 kN
Vc = 349.80 kN > Vpu = 10.72 kN OK Vu < 1/2 øVc , Shear re-bar is not necessary.
15 of 16
4.3.3 Sketch
250 mm

1400 mm
Vertical Bar D13 @200
Longitudinal Bar D13 @ 200
100 mm
600 mm
250 mm
1600 mm
D13 @200 D13 @200

Longitudinal Bar Top & Bottom Vertical Bar Top & Bottom
0 200
16 of 16

Attachment – B
Soil Data


Attachment – C
Bearing Capacity and Settlement Check

III. ESTIMATED SHALLOW BEARING CAPACITY BASED ON CPT TEST DATA
DESCRIPTION D B qc qult qult qa qa temp.

(m) (m) (kg/cm2) (kg/cm2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
S02 0.85 1.60 5.0 0.31 30.04 10.0 13.3 Myerhoff

S02 0.85 1.60 5.0 3.40 333.54 111 147.87 Schmertmann
Note : q ult = qc {(B / 40) ( 1 + D / B)} Myerhoff

q ult = 2 +(0.28 qc) Schmertmann
SF used is 3
qa temp. is qa factored by 1.33
Settlement
Elastic Settlement,
Settlement is given by the following formula Modified Meyerhof’s Method (1965),
Width of foundation, Bf = 1.60 m
Depth of embedment, Deb = 0.85 m
Groundwater table correction, Cw = 1.00
Cw = 1, Depth of water table below foundation
Cw = 2, Depth of water table on foundation
Depth of embedment correction, CD = 1 - (D / 4B) = 0.87
2
Average Bearing pressure, qmax = 27.71 kN/m
N-SPT Value for clay (qc(MPa)/0.35) due to D'Alencar Velosso N= 1.40
Elastic settlement, Se = 24.34 mm
For B ≤ 1.2, Se = Cw * CD * (1.25 * q / N)

For B > 1.22, Se = Cw * CD * (2 * q / N) * [B / (B + 0.3)]^2

Attachment – D
Bund Wall Drawings


Attachment – E
Tank Drawings

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 - Rev.0 Calculation For Bund Wall

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 - Rev.0 Calculation For Bund Wall

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PT PERTAMINA EP

WELL, PRODUCTION & PROJECT DEPT.

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

0 25 May 2022 Issued for Construction DH AW MRA/OMP

JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP (BLANKET ORDER)

Document No.: Revision

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 – Rev- 0 Page 2 of 19

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 – Rev- 0 Page 3 of 19

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 – Rev- 0 Page 4 of 19

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 – Rev- 0 Page 5 of 19

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

Company : PT. PERTAMINA EP, Regional 4 Zona 14

Contractor : Consortium PT Bina Rekacipta Utama – PT Tiga Inti Pilar

JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP (BLANKET ORDER)

4. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

CS Seismic Respond Coefficient

eX, eY, eZ Eccentricity

fC’ Concrete Yield Strength

fy Steel Yield Strength

FRS Foundation shear resistance

FSX, FSZ Foundation shear force

FX, FY, FZ Force

G Gust Effect in Wind

MRX, MRZ Foundation sliding moment resistance

MX, MY, MZ Moment

qal Allowable bearing capacity

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 – Rev- 0 Page 7 of 19

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

PE Earth Pressure Load

5.1. Code dan Standard

Table 5.1 Code and Standard

No. Document Number Document Title

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 – Rev- 0 Page 8 of 19

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

5.3. Reference Project

No. Document Number Document Title

6. MATERIAL UNIT WEIGHT

No. Material Symbol Unit Weight Unit

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 – Rev- 0 Page 9 of 19

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

The aspects analyzed in this document are as follows:

7.2. Soil Parameter Data

7.3. Primary Load

7.3.1. Dead Load (DL)

7.3.2. Live Load (LL)

7.3.3. Piping and Thermal Load (PE, PO, PT)

7.3.5. Liquid Load

7.3.6. Surcharge Load

7.3.7. Soil Pressure Load

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-202 – Rev- 0 Page 10 of 19

Calculation for Concrete Bund Wall

Table 7.1 Load Combinations used for Foundation Stability Check

Table 7.2 Load Combination for Concrete Reinforcement Design

7.5. Shallow Soil Bearing Capacity

SF = Safety Factor (3)

qmax X = FY/AF + MX/SX ≤ qal

qmin X = FY/AF - MX/SX ≥ 0