Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BM3 Final Project
BM3 Final Project
Important Concepts
The role of senior managers becomes crucial in driving through change and
ensuring that firms are well placed with respect to their competitors. However, it is
the case that in many organizations, senior managers actively resist change and in
fact thwart change initiatives due to a variety of reasons which would be explored
in subsequent sections. This essay examines the barriers to change by senior
managers and discusses approaches to mitigate such resistance. The essay begins
with a discussion n the role of senior managers as barriers to change and then
outlines some approaches on how to get the senior managers on board for change.
It goes without saying that “he who rejects change is the architect of decay and
the only human institution that rejects progress is the cemetery.” With this
axiom in mind, it is critical to understand that unless change is actively embraced,
organizations in the 21st century risk obsolescence.
To resist change is as basic as human nature and hence the change managers must
adopt an inclusive approach that considers the personality clashes and the ego
tussles. It is often the case that in large organizations, there tend to be power
centres and fiefdoms and hence the issue of organizational change must address the
group dynamics as well as the individual behavioural characteristics.
Only by an understanding of the means by which managers can be brought on
board can there be a foundation for suitable approaches. The approaches include a
combination of pressure tactics and coordination instead of competition and
cooption as well as cooperation. Change agents must realize that wherever
possible, they must deal with consensual decision making and if that is not
possible, they must walk the talk and be firm in their approach. Managers at all
levels have a tendency to resist change and in the high stakes game of change
management, it is the ones that can articulate and communicate the change in a
clear and coherent manner who succeed.
In conclusion, change is the only constant in business and the landscape of the 21st
century is littered with companies that have not adapted to the changing times.
Hence, organizations must and should embrace change and the approaches
discussed in this paper are part of the solution.
For meeting the growing demands of ever changing business operations, more
dynamic and flexible organizations have endorsed new methods of working like
flexi work hours, work from home, freelancing opportunities, virtual method of
working, business operation outsourcing and project driven operations, etc. which
provide ample opportunities to the workmen to work as per their convenience and
flexibility.
Organizations change for responding to the fluctuations or volatility in the business
environment. Any change in order to have successful outcomes must involve
comprehensive planning, focused approach and involvement of the key
stakeholders in the entire process.
The question is: Will people easily go back to their old normal (with
safety precautions, of course), or will they prefer to continue to work
from home?
The answer, of course, is both. There are some people who can’t wait to
go back to the office. And others have enjoyed working from home and
are hesitant to go running back.
Start by defining the change that people will be going through. What is
the desired future state: Everyone coming into the office? Certain
people coming into the office? Staggered workdays? And, very
importantly, why is that the desired result? No sense making a change
that doesn’t really need to be made.
Identify Impact
What are the implications of people coming back into the office?
Besides new safety protocols, how will people be impacted, positively
or negatively, by no longer working from home?
For example, with schools still being out, childcare could prevent some
people from being able to return to the office easily. And let’s face it,
that will impact women the most. If more men return to the office than
women, how will you avoid a scenario that reinforces gender bias?
Don’t make returning to work an indicator of company loyalty.
Will everyone want to avoid the office? No. Will some people want to
keep working from home? Yes. And if you want them to come into the
office, you need to understand why they will resist that idea. Here are a
few reasons why people might not want to come back to the office:
Leaders set the tone for what is expected through their own behaviors.
If leaders expect people to come into work, then those leaders need to
show up too. At the same time, if leaders want to extend some grace to
those who continue to work from home, then they should work from
home occasionally too to make it ok.
People are more likely to go along with a change that is done with
them, and not to them. So all these decisions do not need to be made
by a central committee. Invite departments to decide what works for
them, and encourage managers not to make the unilateral decision for
their team without their input.
Communicate why the desired future state will benefit the company
and the people working there. Invite people to return to the distraction-
free office and to see people other than their immediate family again.
Beyond just communication, create opportunities to safely collaborate,
have fun, and spark creativity. Give people a reason to want to come
back.
( https://dk.linkedin.com/in/mortenkampandersen?trk=pulse-
article_main-author-card )
(https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/13-best-change-management-
articles-podcasts-videos-so-andersen )