Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dis Advantages of Online
Dis Advantages of Online
2. Updates on the Go
Digital News Media allows you to select the type of news you
are into, and these updates are just a tap away. News Apps
provide you relevant content as per your preference that you
can access with ease anywhere and at any time of the day.
So, don’t worry if your newspaper guy does not show up at
times.
5. Digital Journalism
With everything moved to the digital platforms, digital
reporting or digital journalism has turned into a much easier
choice of career for many. Many Journalism Institutes have
launched digital programs to get the youngsters going with
their skills to reporting and spreading an occurrence swiftly as
it happens.
7. Globalization
Thanks to the internet that enables News Media to bring
coverage to the global audience. News channels are not just
restricted to a particular now, as you can access content from
anywhere. Digital News Media removes regional restrictions
by presenting the regional events to the world expanding their
viewership.
1. Fabricated Content/Hoax
A sudden wave of fake news hits a wider part of global
population when circulated through digital platforms like
Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. Concern about
misinformation and disinformation remains high despite efforts
by leading online journalism platforms to build public
confidence.
2. Negative Content
Accessing the internet is more convenient to everyone. It’s
easier for unscrupulous elements to spread negativity about a
particular individual or group. The spread of unfounded
rumors has led to a spate of uncivilized acts in countries like
India. Several countries have set up ‘tip lines’, appealing to
the public to flag illegal or dangerous content.
4. Advertising
Whether you watch your news segment online, on TV, or
through an app, you are more likely to spend time on
advertisements. Mobile Apps ask you to pay for an ad-free
version, which comes as one of the most troubling
disadvantages of digital new media these days.
5. News Overload
Apart from the leading international news channels, internet
has helped many less popular news channels to evolve at a
rapid rate. There is more news around the web circulating
through different platforms. This is rather more confusing than
to figure out what’s going on really.
Too much information partly reflects how constant news
updates and different perspectives can complicate reality. A
common complaint is that users are bombarded with multiple
versions of the same story or the same alert. The perception
of news overload is highest in the United States (40%)
followed by Denmark and the Chech Republic.
One of the most significant advantages of online journalism is its immediacy. Prior to the
development of online journalism radio was the most immediate medium, with news
bulletins every thirty minutes or every hour. However the online environment allows for
much greater immediacy. Journalists in this medium have the unique ability to publish
news events as they happen. They can then update the stories to include subsequent
information easily and speedily at any time of the day or night. As soon as the information is
uploaded to the web, it is available around the globe.
Another advantage of online journalism is that the medium is reflecting changes in society
as well as technology. About one hundred million people access the world wide web and the
number is ever increasing (De Wolk, 2001: 175). As online information can be accessed at
any time it is a convenient way for people to stay up-to-date on local, national and world
news.
Despite the numerous advantages of online journalism, there are also limitations. The
benefit of immediacy can give rise to some serious ethical issues. The desire to publish
brand new information and the ease of which it can be altered may cause information to be
made accessible before it is verified. This undermines the journalistic principle of accuracy
and can lead to misinformation. Another potential problem is the dilemma of breaking a
news story immediately on the internet and therefore alerting rival news outlets, or waiting
to break the news in another medium and have an exclusive story (De Wolk, 2001).
Other limitations are more general. The immense size of cyberspace and the extent of
information available may intimidate audiences and cause information overload (Hall,
2001). Furthermore, it may be difficult for audiences to distinguish between credible news
websites and other non-official news websites. This can lead to confusion and
misinformation. There are also limitations in online journalism regarding the issues of
surveillance, censorship and privacy.
ADVANTAGES
The Internet is the fastest in terms of being the source of information compared to the traditional
ways of obtaining information. Information can be obtained in a second from micro-blogs (ex.
Twitter) then a moment later it will be followed by pictures of what’s happening or just
happened on Twitpic, Facebook, Instagram, Flickr, etc. and another moment later, videos will be
uploaded on YouTube, Facebook, etc. In just a few moment, you already know what is
happening unlike in mainstream media that you have to wait for the information to be given to
you and it may take an hour or a day (in newspapers) before you obtain the information.
Everyone on the Internet can be a source of information. Even posts on Twitter and Facebook
can be sources of information. Journalists may utilize the Internet to gather information. They
can curate those information and create news content out of it.
Journalists don’t have to be in the event to report it. Some circumstances may disable journalists
to be in the place of the event that they have to report in. It may be there was no correspondent
there and the place is very far away. But thanks to the Internet, publishable news can be made
with the information that the people have there. You can also interview people through Skype to
know what is really happening there. The physical body of the journalist isn’t needed.
The online community as active participants. The online community can update news
organizations real-time for it to be broadcast news. Journalists aren’t everywhere so they can’t
really gather news that fast unlike the grassroots community who was there the whole time and
acting as eyewitness to what is happening.
DISADVANTAGES
Accuracy is compromised for speed. Complete verification of information coming from the
Internet in just a minute is impossible. But to be in par with other news organizations and
journalists that also use the Internet in means of gathering information and disseminating it, they
have to publish it fast. Most news like this come with the tag ‘unverified.’ But doesn’t it violate
the three rules of journalism? “Accuracy! Accuracy! Accuracy!” – Pulitzer
There is an overload of unverified information. With thousand of posts and tweets about an
event, it is very hard for news organizations to verify which are true and which are not.
Publishing/Broadcasting unverified news is dangerous. It may cause harm to other people. For
example, on CNN’s iReport, where the online community can post news there, a person reported
that Steve Jobs suffered from cardiac arrest on 2008. This caused Apple’s stock to have a 5.4%
decline in shares. This was not even published nor made into broadcast but this report has drastic
effect on Apple.
ETHICAL DILEMMA
News organizations with curators that don’t have enough verified information aggregate
published news from other news organizations. This is true, done by lazy journalists and news
organizations that want to keep up with the speed but don’t have other options to do so.
The Internet is indeed the fastest in terms of being a source and being a way of distributing
information. But journalists must also understand how important accuracy is. Journalists must
keep in mind that factual and contextual accuracy is their priority over speed. For me, news with
verified facts and a little bit late than others are better than news made with haste but has no
context and unverified facts.